Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2023 Oct 26;12:1411. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.140180.1

Prevalence of tooth wear diseases in patients with diabetes and its impact on the quality of life in Dakshina Kannada population: a cross sectional study

Poojakumari Sinha 1, Sangeeta Nayak 1,a, Lavangi Sehgal 1, Ramya Shenoy Kudupi 2
PMCID: PMC11320185  PMID: 39140088

Abstract

Background

Early detection and management of tooth wear (TW) has not been given due consideration in the dental profession. Thus, this study aimed to explore the prevalence of TW in adults with diabetes in Dakshina Kannada population using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) and recording its impact on quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14).

Methods

In total, 236 dentate adults with diabetes and TW, who visited the Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore were recruited to the study. Assessment of TW was done using BEWE during examination of each participant and was categorized as none, mild, moderate, and severe. Impact of TW on quality of life was assessed using the OHIP-14.

Results

Overall, 81 (34.30%) individuals had a poor score on the basic erosive tooth index, 82 (34.70%) had a medium score, . The level of TW, both moderate and severe (high), affected quality of life. Erosion, abrasion and attrition were seen in a large proportion of the study population. The diabetic status of the individual was collected from their medical file. The HbA1C level was found to range from good, fair and poor control. The quality of life among the study population was affected because of TW and diabetes. Few participants had hypertension along with diabetes. The majority of study participants were on oral hypoglycaemic agents. Participants used tooth brushes and tooth paste and brushing frequency varied between once or twice daily.

Conclusions

In the study population, there were moderate and severe TW patterns. Quality of life was found to be impacted by TW. Dental professionals must give proper consideration to the influence of TW on quality of life in addition to clinical findings. This will make it easier to offer preventive or restorative management depending on the situation.

Keywords: Attrition, Abrasion, Erosion, Tooth wear, Quality of life

Introduction

People are keeping more natural teeth as they live longer lives. It is vital to have healthy, functional teeth when eating and following a regular diet. Tooth wear (TW), on the other hand, has a detrimental influence on the survival of natural teeth. TW, also known as tooth surface loss (TSL), has recently been identified as a serious oral health concern. 1 3 TW is an insidious, multifactorial disease that affects enamel and dentine, and it may endanger tooth survival and the quality of life linked with dental health among those who are affected. 4 Epidemiological studies support the hypothesis that TW is growing increasingly severe and frequent, not just among older adults but also among those approaching adulthood. 5 , 6 The three most often recognized aetiologies of TW are erosion, attrition, and abrasion. 6 Abfraction, the fourth aetiological factor, has been acknowledged by some but is not accepted by all. 6 These are associated with a variety of clinical symptoms. Given the aetiology's complexity, a definitive diagnosis may be difficult to achieve. TW influences both aesthetics and functionality.

Patients suffering with TW seek dental care as a result. The chemical breakdown of enamel or dentine produced by non-bacterial acids from dietary or gastric sources is known as erosion. The first stage is characterized by dull “silky glazed” enamel surfaces and enamel loss. The palatal surfaces of the maxillary anterior teeth are affected because the tongue and buccal mucosa shelter the other surfaces from exposure to stomach acid in the early stages of gastric erosion. 6 Dietary erosion is characterized by widespread cupped-out lesions, with the pattern being unique to the individual's habits and diet.

Attrition is a gradual deterioration of tooth structure caused by tooth-to-tooth contact in the absence of a foreign object. It often affects the incisal/occlusal region of the teeth. 7 Abrasion is the mechanical wear out of tooth structure that does not require tooth-to-tooth contact, a problem that commonly affects the cervical area of the teeth and is generally caused by poor tooth brushing practices that remove acid-weakened enamel and dentine. 7

Diabetes mellitus, one of the most common diseases on a regional and international scale, is a major cause of morbidity in most countries. 8 , 9 Diabetes is increasing in prevalence worldwide. According to data from the International Federation of Diabetes, 642 million people worldwide will have diabetes by 2040, up from 415 million in 2015. More than 60% of the worldwide population living with diabetes are in Asia, where the prevalence ranges from 3% to 47.3%. 1 Diabetes affects almost 1.3 billion people in India, which has the world's second-highest incidence. According to the International Diabetes Federation, 72.9 million individuals in India had diabetes in 2017.

Diabetes prevalence has risen rapidly and is expected to rise further as a result of the rapid and continuous socioeconomic upheaval in developing countries. Diabetes types 1 and 2 (T2DM) are becoming increasingly frequent. T2DM, the most common type of diabetes, has been the primary driver to the global rise in diabetes prevalence. 10 Diabetes increases the risk of oral disease both directly and indirectly. 11 Periodontal disease affects around one-third of individuals with diabetes. Periodontitis can cause tooth loss or sensitivity. 11 Different oral diseases or issues impact daily life in a variety of ways. There have not been many studies done on wasting diseases and how they affect people's quality of life. As a result, while assessing dental requirements, clinical and psychological factors must be considered.

Patients with diabetes make up the majority of those for whom dental practitioners utilize oral health prevention and promotion to achieve optimal oral and overall health. The incidence, severity, and underlying causes of tooth wear should be understood by dental practitioners. As a result, it is critical to research the frequency and severity of tooth wear among patients with diabetes, as well as how it impacts the quality of life of the general Dakshina Kannada community. Thus, the present research aimed to explore the prevalence of tooth wear in adults with diabetes in Dakshina Kannada population.

Methods

From 29 th July 2022 to September 2022, this cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore. The study protocol was submitted to the Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India's institutional ethics and review board (protocol no: 22023; approval date 28/07/22). Convenient sampling method was followed for the recruitment of the study participants. The patients who visited OPD of Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore during the study period were recruited in the study. Before joining the study, each study participant signed an informed consent form. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 236 people completed the clinical examination and questionnaire.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Participants over the age of 18 years and above with a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and willing to participate in the study were recruited for the research.

Exclusion criteria

Participants having a history of using pharmaceuticals for dental difficulties were excluded from the research, as were those with systemic diseases such as paralysis, leukaemia, epilepsy, depression, and other psychiatric ailments that impact TW, as well as those getting treatment for wasting diseases.

Variables

Each participant's demographic information was collected using a pre-structured case form. Diabetes mellitus information, including type, duration, medication type, and any related diseases, was obtained using their medical file and a structured questionnaire, the case proforma can be found as Extended data. 18 Each participant was asked about their tooth-brushing regimen, including how long and how frequently they washed their teeth. We gathered data on diet and aerated beverage use.

We examined for evidence of tooth decay, gingivitis, periodontitis, missing teeth, sensitive teeth, bruxism, attrition, erosion, or abrasion during the clinical examination. The Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) was developed to track wasting and evaluate tooth deterioration. When there is no tooth wear, the first loss of surface tooth structure is 1, the distinct defect, hard tissue loss of 50% of the surface area is 2, and hard tissue loss of 50% of the surface area is 3. Dentine participation is seen in scores 2 and 3. Following the clinical evaluation, each participant was asked to complete the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire. The OHIP-14 12 contains a questionnaire designed to examine the social consequences of disorders that may jeopardize oral health. Participants in the research were asked to describe any issues from the preceding year using the OHIP-14 rating scale. A high OHIP-14 scale score indicated a poor quality of life.

Bias

Blinding of the investigators and participant was not required as the population only included individuals with diabetes. The reporting bias was taken care of by reporting actual results and confounding agents were excluded to prevent measurement bias.

Study size

The sample size for the study was calculated using the following formula:

n=Zα/2d2p1p

Thus, a minimum of 197 participants were needed for the study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics (20.0) (IBM SPSS® statistics). It was necessary to tabulate the descriptive statistics. A proportional test was used to calculate frequency and distribution. Kruskal Wallis test was applied to check the association between BEWE of patients with diabetes with total OHIP scores. Mann-Whitney test was applied to check within the groups. The result showed statistical significance between the mild to severe BEWE group. The level of significance was set at p<0.05 and post Bonferroni correction it was p<0.02.

Results

The current study included 236 individuals with diabetes in total. There were 171 men (72.50%) and 65 women (27.50%). In total, five (2.10%) of the participants were homemakers, whereas 53 (22.50%) worked in various occupations. A total of 108 (45.80%) were self-employed, while 65 (27.50%) were professionals ( Table 1). Overall, 14 (5.90%) of the study participants had diabetes and hypertension. A total of 136 (57.60%) of research participants used oral hypoglycaemic medication; 48 (20.30%) were using insulin, and 52 (22.00%) were taking ayurvedic drugs ( Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic details of study participants.

Details Count Column N %
Gender Female 65 27.5%
Male 171 72.5%
Occupation Home Maker 5 2.1%
Job 53 22.5%
Business 108 45.8%
Profession 65 27.5%
Other 5 2.1%
Diabetes+ hypertension Absent 222 94.1%
Present 14 5.9%
Type of medication Oral Hypoglycaemic 136 57.6%
Insulin Preparation 48 20.3%
Ayurvedic Medication 52 22.0%
Homeopathic Medication 0 0.0%
Last HbA1C level 4-6 excellent 98 41.5%
7-8 good 130 55.1%
9-14 poor 8 3.4%
Diabetic complication No 234 99.2%
Yes 2 0.8%
Dental history Absent 6 2.5%
Present 230 97.5%
Decay Absent 121 51.3%
Present 115 48.7%
Gingivitis Absent 118 50.0%
Present 118 50.0%
Periodontitis Absent 114 48.3%
Present 122 51.7%
Hopeless tooth Absent 233 98.7%
Present 3 1.3%
Missing Absent 38 16.1%
Present 198 83.9%
Sensitivity Absent 140 59.3%
Present 96 40.7%
Bruxism Absent 204 86.4%
Present 32 13.6%
Any other Absent 212 89.8%
Present 24 10.2%
Diet Veg 62 26.3%
Non-Veg 40 16.9%
Mixed 134 56.8%
Aerated drink intake No 84 35.6%
Yes 152 64.4%
Daily 0 0.0%
Weekly 0 0.0%
Aerated drink frequency NA 84 35.6%
Daily 2 0.8%
Weekly 150 63.6%

In total, 98 (41.50%) individuals had excellent (4-6) previous HbA1C readings, 130 (55.10%) had good (7-8) levels, and eight (3.40%) had bad (9-14) levels ( Table 1). Overall six (2.50%) people had no dental concerns. Around 230 participants in the research had different oral conditions ( Figure 1). Around three (1.30%) of the 236 research participants had hopeless teeth or teeth with a poor prognosis. The bulk of the study population (134 (56.80%)) followed a mixed diet; 62 were vegetarians (26.30%). Among the research participants, 65 (27.50%) used horizontal strokes, while 134 (56.80%) used mixed strokes. A total of 229 (97.00%) of the research participants brushed their teeth twice every day for less than 2 minutes. Whereas seven (3.00%) cleaned their teeth twice every day for more than 2 minutes ( Table 2).

Figure 1. Various dental problems among the study participants.

Figure 1.

Table 2. Oral hygiene practice among study participants.

Details Count Column N %
Tooth brushing Vertical 0 0.0%
Horizontal 65 27.5%
Mixed 171 72.5%
Brushing time <2 minutes 229 97.0%
>2 minutes 7 3.0%
Brushing Method Nill 124 52.5%
Mouthwash 6 2.5%
Floss 53 22.5%
Others 53 22.5%
Brushing material Toothpaste and toothbrush 236 100.0%
Powder 0 0.0%
Others 0 0.0%
Brushing frequency Once daily 107 45.3%
Twice daily 129 54.7%

In total, 53 (22.50%) of the research participants used dental floss. Aerated drinks were consumed by 152 people (64.40%). Aerated drinks were consumed on a weekly basis by 150 people (63.60%). Attrition, abrasion, and erosion are examples of wasting diseases; 223 (94.50%) of the study participants had different types of wasting diseases. Erosion was seen in 228 cases (96.60%), whereas abrasion was observed in 221 cases (93.60%) ( Table 3 and Figure 2). The presence of wasting diseases and the severity was recorded in the oral examination. The participants gained awareness regarding the wasting diseases by their dentists or through newspapers, and magazines. Approximately 96 (40.70%) of the research participants reported sensitivity to hot and cold meals. A total of 96 (40.70%) of the participants reported sensitivity as a result of their teeth becoming thin, short, and structurally damaged. Around 32 (13.60%) of the research participants would grind their teeth. The majority of the participants last went to the dentist one or two years ago. Overall, 129 research participants (54.70%) brushed their teeth twice every day ( Table 2). The fundamental erosive tooth index was seen in 73 (30.90%) of the cases. There was an early loss of surface tooth structure in 81 (34.30%), and in 82 (34.70%) participants ( Table 3). Each participant thoroughly filled out the questionnaire regarding their quality of life ( Table 4 and Figure 3). Chewing food was challenging for 147 (91.90%) of the subjects. Responses were grouped into three sections (neutral, agree/strongly agree, disagree/strongly disagree) ( Figure 3 and Table 4). The association between tooth wear and diabetes and its impact on quality of life was assessed. The result showed statistical significance between the mild to severe BEWE group ( Table 5).

Table 3. Tooth wear and Basic Erosive Wear Examination score among study participants.

Details Count Column N %
Attrition Absent 13 5.5%
Present 223 94.5%
Abrasion Absent 15 6.4%
Present 221 93.6%
Erosion Absent 8 3.4%
Present 228 96.6%
BEWE No erosive tooth wear 73 30.9%
Initial loss of surface structure 81 34.3%
Distinct defect hard tissue loss<50% of the surface area 82 34.7%
Hard tissue loss > = 50% of the surface area 0 0.0%

Figure 2. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) score among study participants.

Figure 2.

Table 4. Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) responses by the study participants.

Details Count Column N %
OHIP_1 Neutral 5 2.1%
Agree/Strongly Agree 75 31.8%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 156 66.1%
OHIP_2 Neutral 38 16.1%
Agree/Strongly Agree 101 42.8%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 97 41.1%
OHIP_3 Neutral 51 21.6%
Agree/Strongly Agree 147 62.3%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 38 16.1%
OHIP_4 Neutral 78 33.1%
Agree/Strongly Agree 154 65.3%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 4 1.7%
OHIP_5 Neutral 19 8.1%
Agree/Strongly Agree 217 91.9%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 0 0.0%
OHIP_6 Neutral 57 24.2%
Agree/Strongly Agree 138 58.5%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 41 17.4%
OHIP_7 Neutral 108 45.8%
Agree/Strongly Agree 85 36.0%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 43 18.2%
OHIP_8 Neutral 65 27.5%
Agree/Strongly Agree 97 41.1%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 74 31.4%
OHIP_9 Neutral 78 33.1%
Agree/Strongly Agree 148 62.7%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 10 4.2%
OHIP_10 Neutral 79 33.5%
Agree/Strongly Agree 143 60.6%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 14 5.9%
OHIP_11 Neutral 87 36.9%
Agree/Strongly Agree 135 57.2%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 14 5.9%
OHIP_12 Neutral 8 3.4%
Agree/Strongly Agree 112 47.5%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 116 49.2%
OHIP_13 Neutral 8 3.4%
Agree/Strongly Agree 113 47.9%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 115 48.7%
OHIP_14 Neutral 3 1.3%
Agree/Strongly Agree 87 36.9%
Disagree/Strongly Disagree 146 61.9%

Figure 3. Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) score among study participants.

Figure 3.

Table 5. Association between tooth wear and its impact on quality of life.

Group Comparison group Test value Significance (p<0.02) – Bonferroni correction
Mild Moderate 2723.500 0.393
Severe 1266.500 0.000
Moderate Severe 2828.000 0.084

Discussion

The current study looked at the prevalence of tooth wear and its influence on the quality of life of those with diabetes. Responses were received from male and female participants ranging in age from 18 to 80 years old, as in previous investigations. 1 , 4 According to Bartlett e t al., more male patients than female patients are sent to the dentist with concerns of TW. 7 This was consistent with the findings of the current study. 1 , 7 There is no evidence that men and women have distinct tooth forms or saliva compositions. The reasons of TW are numerous.

A study by Srisilapanan et al. (2018), like ours, covered participants with type 2 diabetes between the ages of 35 and 74 years old. Patients with diabetes had a higher incidence of tooth loss, which is consistent with previous research. 1 According to data from the American Dental Association, 11 diabetes is responsible for one out of every five tooth loss cases. According to the most current research, the most common kind of TW was attrition, which is consistent with previous findings. 1 Study participants in the present study had a greater rate of TW, which was consistent with previous research. 1 The severity of minor TW and age were shown to be substantially associated.

Diabetes and periodontitis are two exceedingly frequent chronic, noncommunicable diseases that pose severe public health problems for the worldwide population. For a long time, dental specialists have recognized that these two diseases are linked. Periodontitis is known as the sixth complication of diabetes. Diabetes raises the risk of periodontitis by increasing inflammation in periodontal tissues. 13 Participants in the research had gingivitis, periodontitis, decay, and other dental disorders. The inability to maintain excellent oral hygiene may be related to the challenges (sensitivity and discomfort) caused by wasting disorders.

Diabetes and periodontal disease treatment need a lifelong strategy tailored to the patient's individual circumstances. The majority of survey participants used mixed and horizontal strokes to clean their teeth. This must be corrected because it is a common occurrence and a substantial factor to wasting sickness. Any oral health promotion program must include tooth brushing instruction since it improves people's oral health knowledge, attitudes, and habits. Individuals may use it to construct customised dental care programs for themselves. The research participants had moderate to high scores on the basic erosive tooth index. The study looked at how tooth decay affects people's quality of life. Patients who had moderate to severe TW had a worse quality of life. If monitoring TW is made required at every clinical examination, it is less likely that it will be neglected. Every visit should include a TW evaluation to reduce the likelihood of patients’ early warning signs going ignored and no preventative steps being implemented. Dental practitioners should pay attention to their patients’ clinical features and how they affect their patients’ quality of life. On the basis of demand, specialized, preventative, or rehabilitative treatment should be made available. OHIP-14 can be used to quantify the impact of oral diseases on important elements of daily living. 3 Traditional or professionally developed assessment methods for evaluating tooth wear may be utilized to prioritize treatment for individuals who require it the most urgently. 14 , 15

Further study is needed to discover how each of these clinical characteristics influences quality of life. By doing so, it may be feasible to identify the elements that have the greatest impact on people's lives. Future research should look at the link between dental hypersensitivity, aesthetics, tooth deterioration, and quality of life.

Several strategies may be used to assess the severity of various oral disorders in the population. They are often used in the community to minimize the occurrence of diseases and other ailments. The current study used an instrument such as the OHIP-14 to assess the prevalence of TW and its impact on well-being in diabetes. This is supported by other material that is currently available. 16 , 17

Conclusions

In conclusion, the findings of this study provide evidence for the consequences of dental wear disorders in patients with diabetes and their implications on the standard of life of adults in the Dakshina Kannada community. Setting a goal and combining planning and self-monitoring in specific instructions will help you mark the behaviour change more successfully. These people may benefit from regular dental checkups and rigorous adherence to oral hygiene regulations. Future studies should concentrate on this topic.

Funding Statement

The first author Pooja Kumari Sinha received the ICMR STS grant (2022-09468).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Tooth wear in diabetic population, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23635173. 18

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • -

    Datasheet.xlsx

  • -

    data-TW.xlsx

Extended data

Figshare: Tooth wear in diabetic population, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23635173. 18

This project contains the following extended data:

  • -

    case proforma.docx

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

References

  • 1. Srisilapanan P, Jindarat M, Roseman J: The Prevalence and Severity of Tooth Wear in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Int. J. Dent. 2018 Dec 11;2018:3608155–3608158. 10.1155/2018/3608158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Omar R, Johansson A, Johansson AK, et al. : Tooth wear. Int. J. Dent. 2012;2012:1. Article ID 731085. 10.1155/2012/731085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. O’Toole S, Pennington M, Varma S, et al. : 'The treatment need and associated cost of erosive tooth wear rehabilitation - a service evaluation within an NHS dental hospital. BDJ. 2018;224(12):957–961. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Al-Omiri MK, Lamey PJ, Clifford T: Impact of tooth wear on daily living. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2006;2012(6):601–605. 10.5402/2012/161565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bomfim DI: Quality of Life of Patients with Different Levels of Tooth Wear. London, UK: Department Of Prosthodontics, Eastman Dental Institute At The University Of London;2010[googlescholar]. M.Sc. thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kelleher MG, Bomfim DI, Austin RS: Biologically based restorative management of tooth wear. Int. J. Dent. 2012;2012:742509. Epub 2012 Jan 18. 10.1155/2012/742509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bartlett D, Phillips K, Smith B: A difference in perspective the North American and European interpretations of tooth wear. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1999;12(5):401–408. 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nanditha A, Ma RC, Ramachandran A, et al. : Diabetes in Asia and the Pacific: Implications for the Global Epidemic. Diabetes Care. 2016 Mar;39(3):472–485. 10.2337/dc15-1536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zimmet PZ, Magliano DJ, Herman WH, et al. : Diabetes: a 21st century challenge. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:56–64. 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70112-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Patiño MN, Loyola R, Medina S, et al. : Caries, periodontal disease and tooth loss in patients with diabetes mellitus types 1 and 2. Acta Odontol. Latinoam. 2007;21(2):127–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ahmadinia AR, Rahebi D, Mohammadi M, et al. : Association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):100. 10.1186/s12902-022-01012-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Slade GD: Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284–290. 10.1111/j.16000528.1997.tb00941.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Preshaw PM, Alba AL, Herrera D, et al. : Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship. Diabetologia. 2012 Jan;55(1):21–31. 10.1007/s00125-011-2342-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Patel J, Baker SR: Is tooth wear associated with oral health related quality of life in adults in the UK?. Community Dent. Health. 2020 Aug 31;37(3):174–179. 10.1922/CDH_00026Patel06 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ganss C, Schlechtriemen M, Klimek J: Dental erosions in subjects living on a raw food diet. Caries Res. 1999;33:74–80. 10.1159/000016498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rao A, Shenoy R, Rao A: Periodontal health on the quality of life among diabetics. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2014;2(6):608–613. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Acharya S, Bhat PV: Oral-health-related quality of life during pregnancy. J. Public Health Dent. 2009 Spring;69(2):74–77. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2008.00104.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sangeeta N, Sinha P, Sehgal L: Tooth wear in diabetic population.[Dataset]. figshare. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.23635173 [DOI]
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 12. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.153511.r306570

Reviewer response for version 1

Sabin Siddique 1

It is a relevant study and its impact on quality of life of diabetic patients , as it is one of the frequently reported lifestyle disease in the country and wasting diseases based research  is rarely reported among diabetic patients so it is important for dentists to understand the risk of diabetes on oral health.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

dental public health

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2024 Apr 12. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.153511.r218390

Reviewer response for version 1

Menaka Karalwad 1

A well written paper addressing the most common clinical conditions related to dental health. The study would be justified if authors can comment regarding selection of diabetic patients only as their sample and explain the influence of diabetes on tooth wear when compared to systemic healthy individuals otherwise. The study design can be described as descriptive cross-sectional single center study. In methodology the details on who performed the clinical examination-single/multiple examiners to avoid bias can be stated. Habit history of bruxism needs to be mentioned as its important in tooth wear. The age group 18-80 years, it would be interesting to know & explore the association between age groups for the main outcomes assessed.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Periodontal Medicine, Clinical Periodontics, Lasers in Periodontics, Periodontal Microbiology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Sangeeta N, Sinha P, Sehgal L: Tooth wear in diabetic population.[Dataset]. figshare. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.23635173 [DOI]

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Figshare: Tooth wear in diabetic population, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23635173. 18

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • -

      Datasheet.xlsx

    • -

      data-TW.xlsx

    Extended data

    Figshare: Tooth wear in diabetic population, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23635173. 18

    This project contains the following extended data:

    • -

      case proforma.docx

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES