Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2024 Jul 11;13(8):e00293-24. doi: 10.1128/mra.00293-24

Complete genome sequences of Arthrobacter globiformis phages Uzumaki and Argan of cluster AU6

Brandon Mathew 1,#, Andrew Sean Lee 1,#, Katie Chen 1, Michael Kaczmarski 1, Nigel Oommen 1, Asweel Mehaboob 1, Vrushali Patel 2, Yamini Patel 1, Hannah Saji 1, Muhammad Ayaan Shamsi 1, Bryan Gibb 1,
Editor: John J Dennehy3
PMCID: PMC11320949  PMID: 38990022

ABSTRACT

Bacteriophages Uzumaki and Argan infect Arthrobacter globiformis B-2880 isolated from soil samples in Long Island, New York. These bacteriophages have lambda-like morphology with prolate capsid and share 97% gene content similarity. These traits place them in cluster AU6 with other related Arthrobacter phages.

KEYWORDS: bacteriophage, Arthrobacter, AU6, Arthrobacter globiformis, SEA-PHAGE

ANNOUNCEMENT

Arthrobacter phages Argan and Uzumaki were isolated from moist soil samples collected in Glen Oaks and Elmont, New York, respectively. Phage isolation, plaque purification, and genome extraction were performed according to the standard procedures described in the SEA-PHAGES Discovery Guide (https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home), as part of the Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program (1). Both Argan and Uzumaki were isolated by enrichment on Arthrobacter globiformis B-2880 utilizing a peptone–yeast–calcium (PYCa) medium at 30°C for 24–48 h, undergoing three rounds of plaque purification and form clear round plaques 2–6 mm in diameter with defined edges (Fig. 1). High-titer phage lysate was produced by plate lysis using double-agar overlays in phage buffer and 0.22 μm filtered. Negative-stained transmission electron microscopy showed that both phages have prolate icosahedral heads (58–64 nm) and (236–238 nm) long non-contractile tails, consistent with other Caudoviricetes bacteriophage-like phage-lambda (Fig. 1) (2, 3).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Plaque morphology (A and B) and transmission electron microelectron micrographs (C and D) of Arthrobacter phages Uzumaki (A and C) and Argan (B and D). Phage plaques were imaged following incubation at 30°C for 48 h. Phage lysate was negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate and imaged with a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope at 120 KeV.

Genome extraction was performed from high-titer lysates using the Wizard DNA cleanup kit (Promega), and sequencing was performed at the University of Pittsburgh. Libraries were constructed using the NEB Ultra II FS DNA library prep kit and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq v3 platform with single-end sequencing, resulting in 150 bp reads. Raw reads were assembled using Newbler v2.9 (4) with default settings, generating single contigs with an average read depth of approximately 1,250 for Uzumaki and 441 for Argan. The phage contigs were verified using Consed v29 to evaluate completeness and determine genomic termini (5). The genome parameters (length, GC content, and termini) and accession numbers (GenBank and SRA) are shown in Table 1 . The genomes of both phages have defined ends with nine-base complementary 3′ single-stranded extensions.

TABLE 1.

Phage GenBank and SRA accession numbers and genome assembly results

Phage Genbank accession no. SRA accession no. Location (GPS coordinates) Avg coverage No. of reads (thousands) Genome size (bp) Gc % Genome end (3' overhang) No. of genes
Argan OR613480.1 SRX20165760 40.74181 N, 73.71456 W 441 650.85 55,220 50.3 CGCCGGCCT 92
Uzumaki ON970608.1 SRX14485100 40.70616 N, 73.70895 W 1250 486.77 55,355 50.4 CGCCGGCCT 92

Both phages were assigned to cluster AU6 containing other related Arthrobacter phages based on the gene content similarity (GCS) greater than 35% using the tool at PhagesDB (6, 7). Coding regions were predicted using GeneMark v3.25 (8) and Glimmer v3.02 (9). The coding regions were manually checked using Starterator v1.2 (http://phages.wustl.edu/starterator/), PECAAN v20211202 (https://blog.kbrinsgd.org/), and DNA Master v5.23.6 (10). Functions for the genes were found using NCBI BLASTp v2.9 (11), HHPred v2.0.13 (12), and Phamerator (13). No tRNA genes were identified by Aragorn v1.2.41 (14) and tRNAscanSe v2.0 (15). The membrane proteins were predicted using DeepTmHmm v2.0 (16) and TOPCONS 2.0 (17). All software was used with default settings.

Uzumaki and Argan are both predicted to encode 92 protein-coding genes, but only 25 and 23 are assigned putative functions. Argan and Uzumaki have 97% nucleotide identity and 85.87% GCS (6, 7). All genes in both genomes are transcribed on the same strand. The genome organization for both phages is similar, with the genes coding for phage structure and assembly located on the left half of the genome, whereas the genes involved in DNA replication and metabolism are found on the right half. No integrase or immuno-repressor genes were identified, suggesting that the phage exhibits an entirely lytic cycle, which is consistent with the clear plaque morphologies observed in each phage.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the following individuals for their help with this project. Sameer Bhatti and Alexandru Medina isolated phage Uzumaki and Michael Kaczmarski and Nigel Oommen for isolated phage Argan. The Spring 2022 and 2023 sections of SEA-PHAGE Bioinformatics at NYIT for help annotating Argan and Uzumaki’s genome. Dan Russell, Rebecca Garlena, and the staff at the University of Pittsburgh for sequencing and assembling the genomes of Argan and Uzumaki, and Graham Hatful for his contribution in the SEA-PHAGE program. This research used the Electron Microscopy Facility of the Center for Functional Nanomaterials (CFN), which is a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704.

Funding was provided by the Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury under the SEA-PHAGE research lab program.

Contributor Information

Bryan Gibb, Email: bgibb@nyit.edu.

John J. Dennehy, Queens College Department of Biology, Queens, New York, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Genbank accession and Sequence read archive (SRA) numbers for phages Uzumaki and Argan are provided in Table 1.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, et al. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01051-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Turner D, Shkoporov AN, Lood C, Millard AD, Dutilh BE, Alfenas-Zerbini P, van Zyl LJ, Aziz RK, Oksanen HM, Poranen MM, et al. 2023. Abolishment of morphology-based taxa and change to binomial species names: 2022 taxonomy update of the ICTV bacterial viruses subcommittee. Arch Virol 168:74. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05694-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ackermann HW. 1998. Tailed bacteriophages: the order caudovirales. Adv Virus Res 51:135–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Miller JR, Koren S, Sutton G. 2010. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics 95:315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gordon D, Green P. 2013. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29:2936–2937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pope WH, Mavrich TN, Garlena RA, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Jacobs-Sera D, Montgomery MT, Russell DA, Warner MH, Hatfull GF, Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) . 2017. Bacteriophages of Gordonia spp. display a spectrum of diversity and genetic relationships. mBio 8:e01069-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01069-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA master: an overview, p 217–229. In Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, Lavigne R (ed), Bacteriophages: methods and protocols. Vol. 3. Springer, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Research 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chan PP, Lowe TM. 2019. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol Biol 1962:1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hallgren J, Tsirigos KD, Pedersen MD, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Marcatili P, Nielsen H, Krogh A, Winther O. 2022. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.08.487609 [DOI]
  • 17. Tsirigos KD, Peters C, Shu N, Käll L, Elofsson A. 2015. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W401–W407. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Genbank accession and Sequence read archive (SRA) numbers for phages Uzumaki and Argan are provided in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES