ABSTRACT
Here, we present the draft genome sequences of two Gluconobacter strains that were isolated from spoiled orange juice. Gluconobacter are members of the acetic acid bacteria and are known for their unique metabolism and use in industry. Understanding acetic acid bacteria diversity is essential for engineering further optimized industrial strains.
KEYWORDS: acetic acid bacteria, genome sequencing, environmental microbiology, genomics, whole genome
ANNOUNCEMENT
Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) incompletely oxidize growth substrates using membrane-bound dehydrogenases (1, 2). The byproducts diffuse into the media, which makes them industrially useful for production of vinegar, vitamin C, the antidiabetic drug miglitol, dihydroxyacetone, and many artificial flavorings (3 – 5). To expand upon known AAB diversity and identify new targets for strain design, we sequenced the genomes of two Gluconobacter strains.
These Gluconobacter strains were isolated from spoiled Fit & Active Orange Juice Beverage purchased in Onalaska, WI. Samples were plated onto YG medium (6 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L glucose, 2.5 g/L MgSO4 × 7H2O, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 1 g/L KH2PO4, pH 6.0) with 50 µg/mL cefoxitin and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. For initial isolation, 20 g/L CaCO3 was added to differentiate AAB colonies, and 15 g/L agar was added to make solid media. Isolated colonies producing zones of clearance were selected and passaged to purity. Genomic DNA was isolated from single colonies grown in YG broth using the DNeasy UltraClean Microbial Kit (QIAGEN, Ann Arbor, MI). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers 8FE/1492R and Sanger sequenced by Eurofins Genomics (Louisville, KY) using their 16F primer (CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT). Two isolates were identified as Gluconobacter spp. using the NCBI BLAST RefSeq database. The isolates Gluconobacter sp. OJA and OJB best matched G. cerinus (99.90% identity, E-value: 0.0, accession: NR_118192) and G. cerevisiae (99.88% identity, E-value: 0.0, accession: NR_117735).
For whole-genome sequencing, Gluconobacter sp. OJA and OJB were grown on YG agar from 15% glycerol stocks stored at −80°C. Single colonies were inoculated into YG broth with 50 µg/mL cefoxitin at 30°C with 250 rpm shaking overnight. Genomic DNA was isolated as described above. DNA was quantified using the QuantiFlor dsDNA System (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) and sent to SeqCenter (Pittsburgh, PA) for sequencing. Illumina libraries were prepared using an Illumina DNA Prep Kit and IDT 10 bp UDI indices and sequenced on a NextSeq 2000 producing 2 × 151 bp reads. Demultiplexing and adapter removal used bcl2fastq v.2.20.0.422. Nanopore sample preparation used the Oxford Nanopore Genomic DNA by Ligation kit (SQK-LSK109) and protocol without shearing. Samples were run on a MinION using Nanopore R9 flow cells (R9.4.1). Quality control and basecalling used Guppy v5.0.16 in high-accuracy base mode (6).
Reads were processed and assembled using KBase and the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (7, 8). All software used default parameters except where noted. Read libraries were quality checked using FastQC v0.12.1 and Compute Simple Read Library Stats v2.0.2. Low-quality reads and adapter sequences were trimmed using the JGI RQCFilter pipeline (BBTools v38.22) v0.5.0, Trim Galore v0.6.5dev, and CutAdapt v4.2 (9). Trimmed reads were assembled using HybridSPAdes v3.15.3 (minimum contig length: 2,000 bp, K-mer sizes: 21, 33, 55, 77, 99, and 127). The assembled genome was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.7 and deposited to NCBI (10). Summary statistics and relevant reporting information are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Genome assembly statistics, annotation features, and data accession numbers
| Strain | Gluconobacter sp. OJA | Gluconobacter sp. OJB |
|---|---|---|
| Illumina data | ||
| No. of raw reads generated | 5,519,762 | 6,368,484 |
| No. of raw Mb generated | 811.69 | 936.36 |
| No. of reads after filtering | 5,295,054 | 6,109,328 |
| No. of Mb after filtering | 733.67 | 892.74 |
| Fold coverage | 211.83 | 280.65 |
| SRA ID | SRX24435052 | SRX24435054 |
| Nanopore data | ||
| No. of raw reads generated | 105,690 | 539,216 |
| No. of raw Mb generated | 490.66 | 2137.17 |
| N 50 | 11,732 | 7,350 |
| No. of reads after filtering | 105,690 | 539,216 |
| No. of Mb after filtering | 401.46 | 1835.80 |
| Fold coverage | 121.80 | 624.20 |
| SRA ID | SRX24435053 | SRX24435055 |
| Hybrid assembly | ||
| Total length | 3,794,501 | 3,305,620 |
| N 50 | 2,287,605 | 2,819,765 |
| L 50 | 1 | 1 |
| No. of contigs | 11 | 10 |
| GC content (%) | 56.19 | 58.21 |
| Completeness (%) a | 97.93 | 96.01 |
| Contamination (%) a | 7.44 | 7.58 |
| Genome annotation | ||
| Protein-coding genes | 3,419 | 3,054 |
| 5S rRNA | 4 | 4 |
| 16S rRNA | 4 | 4 |
| 23S rRNA | 4 | 4 |
| tRNAs | 57 | 58 |
| Taxonomic classification | ||
| Placement reference | GCA_002723935.1 | GCA_018811965.1 |
| Placement taxonomy b | Gluconobacter cerinus | Gluconobacter cerevisiae |
| Placement ANI | 96.95 | 96.45 |
| Accession numbers | ||
| BioProject accession | PRJNA1107211 | PRJNA1107211 |
| Biosample accession | SAMN41163485 | SAMN41163486 |
| GenBank accession | JBDIWI000000000 | JBDIWH000000000 |
Predicted with CheckM v1.2.2 within the PGAP v6.7.
Taxonomic assignment performed using the PGAP v6.7.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the University of Wisconsin - La Crosse for providing resources and facilities to complete this work. We would also like to thank our colleagues in the Microbiology Department for useful conversations about this project. We would especially like to thank Dr. Todd Osmundson for their technical assistance and advice.
Contributor Information
Paul Schweiger, Email: pschweiger@uwlax.edu.
David A. Baltrus, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The draft genome sequences of Gluconobacter sp. OJA and Gluconobacter sp. OJB have been deposited at NCBI. Their accession numbers are listed in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Deppenmeier U, Ehrenreich A. 2009. Physiology of acetic acid bacteria in light of the genome sequence of Gluconobacter oxydans. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 16:69–80. doi: 10.1159/000142895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Prust C, Hoffmeister M, Liesegang H, Wiezer A, Fricke WF, Ehrenreich A, Gottschalk G, Deppenmeier U. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the acetic acid bacterium Gluconobacter oxydans. Nat Biotechnol 23:195–200. doi: 10.1038/nbt1062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Deppenmeier U, Hoffmeister M, Prust C. 2002. Biochemistry and biotechnological applications of Gluconobacter strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60:233–242. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1114-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. da Silva GAR, Oliveira S de S, Lima SF, do Nascimento RP, Baptista A de S, Fiaux SB. 2022. The industrial versatility of Gluconobacter oxydans: current applications and future perspectives. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 38:134. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03310-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang EX, Ding MZ, Ma Q, Dong XT, Yuan YJ. 2016. Reorganization of a synthetic microbial consortium for one-step vitamin C fermentation. Microb Cell Fact 15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0418-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sherathiya VN, Schaid MD, Seiler JL, Lopez GC, Lerner TN. 2021. GuPPy, a Python toolbox for the analysis of fiber photometry data. Sci Rep 11:24212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03626-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, et al. 2018. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, Davis JJ, Dempsey DM, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Kenyon RW, et al. 2023. Introducing the bacterial and viral bioinformatics resource center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The draft genome sequences of Gluconobacter sp. OJA and Gluconobacter sp. OJB have been deposited at NCBI. Their accession numbers are listed in Table 1.
