Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2024 Jun 1;80:102494. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2024.102494

Host-Microbe Interactions: Communication in the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis

Aryan Shekarabi 1, Izhan Qureishy 1, Chloe Puglisi 1, Marge Dalseth 1, Helen Vuong 1
PMCID: PMC11323153  NIHMSID: NIHMS1999288  PMID: 38824840

Abstract

Animals harbor a diverse array of symbiotic microorganisms that coexist in communities across different body sites1. These microbes maintain host homeostasis and respond to environmental insults to impact host physiological processes. Trillions of indigenous microbes reside in the gastrointestinal tract and engage with the host central nervous system (microbiota-gut-brain axis) by modulating immune responses, interacting with gut intrinsic and extrinsic nervous system, and regulating neuromodulators and biochemicals2. These gut microbiota to brain signaling pathways are constantly informed by each other and are hypothesized to mediate brain health across the lifespan. In this review, we will examine the crosstalk of gut microbiota to brain communications in neurological pathologies, with an emphasis on microbial metabolites and neuromodulators, and provide a discussion of recent advances that help elucidate the microbiota as a therapeutic target for treating brain and behavioral disorders.

Keywords: microbial metabolites, brain and behavior, gut-brain axis, Microbiome, vagus nerve

INTRODUCTION

Over recent decades, foundational microbiota studies from animals and humans reveal microbes play critical roles in promoting health and modulating the development and function of the central nervous system1,2. While most of this review will focus on evidence of the bacteriome in the microbiota-gut-brain signaling, emerging studies reveal the gut virome (viruses) and mycobiome (fungi) can modify the bacteriome and influence host physiology. For example, change in bacteriophage composition has been associated with Parkinson’s disease3. Fecal virome transplants, prepared from fecal filtrate composed of viral particles, have been used to improve Clostridioides difficile infection, necrotizing enterocolitis, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth4,5. In a murine model of chronic variable stress, researchers observed reduced social and increased depression-like behavior, alterations in immune responses, and bacteriome changes. Transfer of the fecal virome prior to the induction of chronic stress protected against stress associated disruptions in behaviors, immunity, and bacteriome6. Notably, this protection was associated with the restoration of the bacteriome’s capacity for S-adenosylmethionine synthesis6. In a separate study, Caudovirales was associated with better performance in memory tasks in humans, mice, and flies7. Similarly, changes in gut mycobiome composition, such as abundance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans, has been associated intestinal disorders, cancer, metabolic disorders, and neurological disorders including multiple sclerosis, Rett syndrome, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease8. Mucosa-associated fungi support intestinal epithelial function via IL-22 signaling and promote social behavior via IL-17 pathway in mice9. As such, the virome and mycobiome play an important role in the modulation of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, suggesting that they should be considered when designing microbiome-directed therapies. For the remainder of the review, we will describe the effects of the microbiota in reference to bacteria mediated impacts on host physiology.

In humans, a departure from the homeostatic microbiota composition has been associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction, neuropsychiatric disorders, diabetes, obesity, and autoimmune diseases1013. In addition, patients with ASD, mood disorders (anxiety and depression), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s have alterations in the gut microbiome composition and metabolite levels, suggesting microbiota changes contribute to nervous system abnormalities1417 (Figure 1B). For example, using the Rotterdam Study (1,054 participants) and the Amsterdam HELIUS program (1,539) to study the fecal microbiota composition in relation to depressive symptoms, researchers identified 13 different genera that were associated with increased presentation of depressive symptoms18. Correspondingly, in invertebrate animals, such as bees, planarians, and drosophila, environmental stressors can change their microbiome and alter stress response, regeneration rates, developmental patterning, memory, food preference and aggressive behaviors1924. In other animals, such as birds, diet-induced gut microbiome changes are associated with exploratory behavior and problem-solving performance25,26. Germ-free (GF) mice, which are raised devoid of microbes, exhibit brain and behavioral changes including increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, disrupted microglia maturation patterns, reduced thalamocortical axonogenesis, altered neurochemical expression, modified synaptic morphology, abnormal cognitive behaviors and heightened stress responses compared to conventionally raised mice with a complete microbiome2734. Further, in preclinical studies using murine models of neurodevelopmental, mood and neurodegenerative disorders, disruption of the gut microbiome has been linked to specific neurological dysfunctions and behavioral abnormalities across different life stages1416,35,36. Notably, selective colonization with a specific bacterium or a consortium of bacteria in stress, ASD, and ALS mouse models yield beneficial brain and behavioral effects16,35,36. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus regulates γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor expression in the brain, promotes gut health, and reduced anxiety- and depression-related behaviors in mice and humans33,37. Together, the microbiota is recognized to be a modifier of human and animal biology.

Figure 1. Gut microbiota modulation of metabolites and nervous system.

Figure 1.

(A) Gut bacteria regulate levels of neurotransmitters that act on the vagus nerve, levels of microbial metabolites that cross the blood brain barrier, and levels of precursor molecules that generate neuromodulators to influence brain and behaviors. (B) Gut regulated metabolites and neuromodulators are associated with mouse models of neurological disorders.

As we consider the role of the microbiota in the gut-brain axis it is important to highlight biological determinants of the microbiota such as body site, age, and sex can differentially influence host physiology29,38,39. For example, in mice, the paternal and maternal microbiome can impact placental development, offspring growth and development trajectories, and fitness28,4042. Nonobese diabetic mice show a sex-specific microbiome profile that mediates sex-biased autoimmunity, sex hormone expression levels and metabolic changes, whereby transplanting male specific pathogen-free (SPF) microbiota into female recipients correlated with increased testosterone levels in female mice and protection against invasive insulitis43. Similarly, diet-induced changes to the microbiota are sex-dependent leading to differential effects on locomotion and anxiety-related behaviors44. In addition to the gut microbiota, metabolites are also regulated by sex. In a study that profiled the metabolites along the gastrointestinal tract and systemic sites (peritoneal fluid, serum, liver, spleen, and urine) of GF, gnotobiotic-colonized with OMM12 consortium of bacteria, and SPF mice, the metabolome was strongly determined by body site, and secondarily controlled by the microbiota, age, or sex45. Together, these findings suggest that sex, along with other biological factors can influence the microbiome and metabolome, and further studies are needed to elucidate how sex-induced changes in the microbiome and metabolome confer health and disease responses in the host.

While we are only at the beginning of understanding the complex communication between the microbiota and brain, in this review, we will examine evidence of how this bidirectional signaling impacts brain functionality and behaviors in health and disease.

Immune and neuronal communication between the gut microbiota and the brain

One mechanism of gut-brain signaling is through microbial interactions with the immune system. The dense population of immune cells in the gastrointestinal tract are in constant communication with microbes and their metabolites to inform immune homeostasis and direct pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory responses. Many bacterial metabolites including neuromodulators, bile acids, choline, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are immunomodulatory31,46. Microbiota-host interactions at the level of the gut can lead to the release of cytokines and chemokines that enter blood and lymphatic circulation, and influence immune signaling across the body, including the brain27,31,47. Indeed, in addition to significant brain and behavioral abnormalities, germ-free mice have an underdeveloped immune system and impaired neuroimmune function48,49. An important component of the neuroimmune system are microglia, which are the brain’s resident immune cells. In germ-free mice, microglia exhibit an immature phenotype and impaired function, which were prevented by conventionalization of the microbiota or supplementation of microbial metabolites such as SCFAs31. Further, as reported in germ-free mice, the microbiota regulates development and integrity of the BBB, which serves to regulate the passage and exchange of molecules and nutrients between the circulatory system and brain parenchyma, as well as protect the brain from toxins, pathogens, and inflammation during injury and disease27,50. Yet, a compromised BBB can result in the crossing of microbial products, and bacterial or viral infections entering the brain via the bloodstream or cerebrospinal fluid, and subsequently induce an immune response against the brain. In profiling the human microbiota, patients with multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease display an altered gut microbiota composition compared to healthy controls51,52. These shifts in the gut microbiome are associated with immune and neurobehavioral abnormalities. For example, in mice with overexpression of a-synuclein, a model of Parkinson’s disease, absence of the microbiota ameliorates motor impairments and altered microglia activation. Whereas administration of SCFAs promotes motor dysfunction and α-synuclein-stimulated microglia activation15 (Figure 1B). In a separate study using the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model for multiple sclerosis, mice with a deficient or depleted microbiota displayed resistance to brain inflammation and had reduced EAE severity53, thus suggesting the gut microbiome can inform neuroimmune responses that then modify brain pathology and behaviors.

A second mechanism of gut-brain communications is mediated by gut intrinsic neurons (enteric nervous system - ENS) and extrinsic neurons (spinal and vagal afferents) (Figure 1A). The ENS is positioned at the interface of the microbiota and intestinal cells, to respond to the microbiota and its metabolites. To convey sensory information to the brain, ENS communication is relayed from intestinofugal neurons to sympathetic ganglia to primary afferent neurons. Studies of the ENS using germ-free animals show abnormal ultrastructural and neurochemical development, altered neuronal excitability, and deficits in intrinsic sensory signaling54,55. In addition, colonizing germ-free mice with a conventional microbiota induces maturation of the ENS, and this was dependent on serotonin and 5HT4 receptor56. The vagus nerve is the 10th cranial nerve and facilitates bidirectional communication between the gut and brain (Figure 1A). The vagus nerve relays information about gastrointestinal motility, secretion and absorption, epithelial permeability, and is influenced by the digestive environment and composition of the gut microbiome57. Recent discoveries reveal the vagus nerve expresses a variety of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs)5860. Nutrient and sensory signaling through these receptors that are localized to the vagal nerve-brain pathway informs complex behaviors such as food preference, motivation, and reward6063. In addition, studies using subdiaphragmatic vagotomy reveal the vagus nerve mediates the effects of the gut microbiome on serotonin and dopamine neurotransmission in the brain and, emotional and social behaviors that are implicated in neurodevelopmental and mood disorders33,64,65. These immune and neuronal microbiota-gut-brain communications are also highly influenced by endocrine and bioactive molecules. Thus, raising the questions, how do microbial metabolites mediate microbiome signaling to the brain, and how do microbial metabolites influence neurological states. In subsequent sections, we will examine how microbially derived molecules interact with the host and contribute to the brain and behaviors.

Communication pathways of microbially-modulated molecules

Short-chain fatty-acids and amino acids

Another major pathway of microbial influence on the nervous system is through molecules modulated by the microbiome (Figure 1A). Among the different classes of small molecules, SCFAs, which include propionate, butyrate, and acetate have been most examined and reviewed by Dalile and colleagues66. SCFAs, products of bacterial fermentation of non-digestible polysaccharides, play a key role in gut-brain signaling pathways, targeting immune, endocrine, and neural cells, which is supported by evidence that germ-free animals and antibiotic-treated animals have considerably lower SCFA levels67,68. One mechanism that SCFAs can mediate microbiota-gut-brain communication to influence brain physiology and behavior is through epigenetic modifications, whereby all SCFAs have histone deacetylase inhibitory effects that alter learning and memory, depression-like behaviors, and social behaviors66. Additionally, the SCFA receptor FFAR3 is expressed on the vagus nerve and SCFA administration can regulate neuronal activity in the dorsal vagal complex, parabrachial nucleus and hypothalamus69, suggesting multiple levels of regulation by SCFA on gut-brain signaling. Further, decreased fecal SCFA levels and correlating brain and behavioral changes have been reported in Parkinson’s disease and anorexia nervosa15. In animal models, SCFAs and SCFA-producing bacteria have neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in neurodevelopmental, autoimmune and neurocognitive disorders, including autism, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s15,7072 (Figure 1B). Overall, SCFAs have broad influences on nervous system development and function, but further research is needed to understand how individual SCFAs influence the brain either directly or indirectly, and how these interactions may result in interventions for neurological disorders.

Dietary protein and amino acids are metabolized by intestinal epithelial cells and gut bacteria to mediate microbe-host interactions. Amino acids (AA) have diverse roles in the intestine including, synthesis of molecules for nutrition, host physiology, and intestinal structure and function (eg. proline, neurotransmitters, mucins, immunoglobulins), fermentation of proteins and catabolism of AA for energy (e.g., SCFA, branched-chain fatty acids, phenolic and indolic compounds), and production of AA metabolites that are neuromodulators (eg. GABA, dopamine, serotonin, and nitric oxide). Absence of the microbiota induces lower levels of intestinal AA, as seen in GF animals compared to conventional controls73 (Figure 1A). Indoles derived from dietary tryptophan metabolism by the gut microbiota, such as indole propionic acid, indoxyl-3-sulfate, indole-3-acetate, indole-3-aldehyde, tryptamine, and 3-methyl-indole are aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) or pregnane X receptor (PXR) agonists74,75. In the EAE mouse model of multiple sclerosis, indoxyl-3-sulfate, in combination with type 1 interferon signaling, activate AhR in astrocytes to reduce inflammation in the central nervous system and EAE clinical disease score74 (Figure 1B). Using a sciatic nerve crush mouse model of nerve injury, researchers demonstrated indole-3-propionic acid, produced by Clostridium sporogenes, can promote axon regeneration and recover sensory responses via neutrophil chemotaxis and PXR signaling75 (Figure 1B). While many microbial metabolites have beneficial properties, 4-ethylphenyl sulfate, a metabolite of dietary tyrosine, which was increased in a maternal immune activation mouse model36, impaired oligodendrocyte development, decreased oligodendrocyte to neuron interactions, reduced myelination of axons, and induced anxiety-like behaviors in mice35. Together, amino acids and amino acid metabolites maintain intestinal homeostasis and have important functions in regulating neuroimmune signals and neurophysiology. However, further research is needed to understand the bioavailability of amino acids in different neurological conditions, elucidate the exact molecular and cellular mechanisms of how various amino acids interact with the brain, and examine how manipulating dietary amino acid levels may appropriately be used for interventions in neurological disorders.

Neuropeptides and Neuromodulators and receptors

The gut microbiota can influence the levels of peripheral neuroactive molecules and hormones that modulate host physiology. GF mice have significantly reduced intestinal levels of the neurochemicals serotonin (5-HT) and GABA, detectable intestinal levels of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine76 (Figure 1A). Over 90% of the body’s 5-HT is synthesized in the gut, where specific bacteria regulate 5-HT biosynthesis77. Intestinal 5-HT is used for a variety of biological functions including immune modulation, bacterial colonization, and host lipid metabolism78. However, given that 5-HT does not cross the BBB, it is unlikely that gut derived serotonin directly impacts central neural circuits. Therefore, it will be important to understand how peripheral 5-HT are involved in gut-brain communication and whether it affects neurological function. GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the nervous system, is synthesized by Escherichia spp., Lactobacillus spp., Bacteroides spp.37,79, and likely others as the fecal microbiome encode genes for glutamate decarboxylase, the enzyme that converts glutamic acid to GABA. Given that microbes and sensory neurons that innervate the gut epithelium express GABA receptors, intestinal GABA can influence the microbiota and host.

However, how intestinal GABA may impact microbial function and mediate microbe-host crosstalk remains to be uncovered. A variety of bacteria produce catecholamines, for example, the genus Escherichia produces norepinephrine, and Bacillus synthesizes norepinephrine and dopamine. While enterochromaffin cells respond to catecholamines80 (Figure 1A), how bacterial derived catecholamines influence host physiology is unclear.

Molecules modulated by gut bacteria communicate with neuronal and non-neuronal cells through an array of transporters and GPCRs8183. GPCR interactions with ligands are vital for signaling sensory information and maintaining homeostasis. Free fatty acid receptors FFAR2 and FFAR3 are GPCRs that respond to SCFAs to regulate activation of spinal cord neurons, gut-associated sympathetic neurons, and microglia31,84,85. Notably, many microbiota-modulated metabolites are ligands for canonical neurotransmitter receptors such as HTR (serotonin), DRD (dopamine), and HRH (histamine) families8183. A number of GPCRs are present on vagal neurons, suggesting microbiota metabolites can signal to the brain through peripheral neurons58. GPCRs are implicated in a large number of diseases including cancer, depression, and Alzheimer’s, making them the targets of approximately 40% of all prescribed medications86. Thus, understanding the interactions between microbial molecules and host GPCRs along the gut-brain axis will be important for developing microbial metabolite-based therapeutics.

Microbiome and microbial products as therapeutic targets

Pioneering microbiome-centered therapeutic strategies requires an understanding of how microbes interact with the host across various contexts. Current microbiome-based therapeutic modalities, which span prebiotics, probiotics, antibiotics, dietary changes, and fecal transplants, necessitate further investigations to determine their effectiveness as interventions for neurological abnormalities. A primary challenge is defining a healthy versus a disease microbiome that can be reproducibly targeted for microbiome-based therapeutics. Notably, individual demographics - genetics, diet, and lifestyle confound results and affect reproducibility. Further, an incomplete understanding of how different systems within the host responds to microbial changes inhibit effective strategies. That said, the future of microbiome-based therapeutics is promising, as studies continue to refine our understanding of host-microbe interactions along the gut-brain axis.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been most efficaciously employed in treating C. difficile in patients with an 87% resolution after the first FMT87. In rodent studies, microbiota transplantation from a healthy control ameliorated gut dysbiosis, cognitive decline, age-associated behavioral impairments, social deficits and depressive behaviors, and in some cases by augmenting the abundance of SCFA-producing microbes8891. Other FMT studies have demonstrated that these procedures may apply to other pathophysiologies such as atherosclerosis92. Together, FMT can have broad therapeutic implications, including but not limited to neurological disorders. However, it should be noted that these are preclinical findings and further investigations are needed to understand how FMT should be administered, including how to select the donor microbiota, and what are the consequences across systems in the host.

Probiotic supplementation is a form of microbial-based intervention that has historical roots, as humans have been consuming probiotics for thousands of years, mainly in the form of fermented products. As described throughout this review, probiotic use in preclinical and clinical studies confer brain and behavioral benefits. However, the unregulated nature of probiotics, suggest further research on standardizing how to administer the bacteria are needed. For example to ensure that the indicated amount of living bacteria is surviving the journey from manufacture to the intestine, researchers designed a mineral coating to encapsulate Bacteroides fragilis that can withstand O2 exposure, UV radiation, ethanol, and the acidic environment93. Supplementing the coated B. fragilis sufficiently ameliorated body weight loss, intestinal length decreases, TNF-α levels, and structural damage of the colon in DSS-induced mouse model of colitis. Though exciting, this study raises the questions of how does one versus a consortium of bacteria fair in a single capsule, what are the effects of the probiotics on local versus the systemic environment, and are there host specific responses that are shaped by genetics, lifestyle, and diet.

Another strategy of microbiota-centered intervention involves modulating metabolite levels. The microbiota can regulate metabolites, such as carnitine mimics, that can cross the blood brain barrier and localize to specific brain regions94. In preclinical studies, administration of metabolites in disease conditions show beneficial effects. In a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Blacher et al. found decreased nicotinamide metabolism, and supplementing nicotinamide improved motor function16. In mouse model of peripheral nerve injury, microbially produced indole-3 propionic acid promoted axonal regeneration and thermal sensory responses75 (Figure 1B). Finally, in a mouse model of maternal malnutrition, supplementing pregnant dams with SCFAs promoted placental growth and vascularization40. Together, rescuing deficiencies in microbial metabolites offers an avenue for microbes to modulate host physiology in numerous disease conditions.

Others have found some microbial metabolites have negative effects on the host. The microbial metabolite 4EPS was previously reported to be elevated in a mouse model of atypical neurodevelopment. In a recent study, 4EPS, produced by bioengineered bacteria, entered the brain, impaired oligodendrocyte maturation, and induced anxiety-like behavior in mice35 (Figure 1B). For example, in mice with impaired gut barriers, the microbial enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) decreased active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and impaired host glucose homeostasis95. Inhibiting microbial DPP4, increased active GLP-1 levels and improved glucose metabolism in diabetic mice, suggesting the selective titer of metabolites function can regulate host responses.

Overall, studies with a complete library and characterization of metabolites and their corresponding receptors in varying biological contexts will inform strategies for precision medicine. Our dynamic relationship with microorganisms continues to reshape our understanding of biology in health and disease conditions. Unraveling the mechanisms governing the interplay between host and microbes will reveal the fundamental relationships between the microbiota, gut and brain and offer valuable insights into novel therapeutic approaches for neurological diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Figure 1 was created with BioRender.com. We thank members of the Vuong lab for their helpful feedback.

Funding:

This work was supported by an NICHD Pathway to Independence Award (H.E.V.) and Pew Charitable Trusts (H.E.V.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

REFERENCES

• Of Special Interest

• • Of Outstanding Interest

  • 1.Vuong HE, Yano JM, Fung TC & Hsiao EY The Microbiome and Host Behavior. Annu Rev Neurosci 40, 21–49 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cryan JF et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiological Reviews 99, 1877–2013 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tetz G, Brown SM, Hao Y & Tetz V Parkinson’s disease and bacteriophages as its overlooked contributors. Sci Rep 8, 10812 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rasmussen TS et al. Bacteriophage-mediated manipulation of the gut microbiome - promises and presents limitations. FEMS Microbiol Rev 44, 507–521 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brunse A et al. Fecal filtrate transplantation protects against necrotizing enterocolitis. ISME J 16, 686–694 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ritz NL et al. The gut virome is associated with stress-induced changes in behaviour and immune responses in mice. Nat Microbiol 9, 359–376 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mayneris-Perxachs J et al. Caudovirales bacteriophages are associated with improved executive function and memory in flies, mice, and humans. Cell Host & >Microbe 30, 340–356.e8 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang F, Aschenbrenner D, Yoo JY & Zuo T The gut mycobiome in health, disease, and clinical applications in association with the gut bacterial microbiome assembly. The Lancet Microbe 3, e969–e983 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leonardi I et al. Mucosal fungi promote gut barrier function and social behavior via Type 17 immunity. Cell 185, 831–846.e14 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scheithauer TPM et al. Gut Microbiota as a Trigger for Metabolic Inflammation in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Front Immunol 11, 571731 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S & Gordon JI Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444, 1022–1023 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhuang Z-Q et al. Gut Microbiota is Altered in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 63, 1337–1346 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cekanaviciute E et al. Gut bacteria from multiple sclerosis patients modulate human T cells and exacerbate symptoms in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, 10713–10718 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sharon G et al. Human Gut Microbiota from Autism Spectrum Disorder Promote Behavioral Symptoms in Mice. Cell 177, 1600–1618.e17 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sampson TR et al. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Cell 167, 1469–1480.e12 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blacher E et al. Potential roles of gut microbiome and metabolites in modulating ALS in mice. Nature 572, 474–480 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ∙ ∙ In a mouse model of ALS, absence of the microbiota exacerbates motor symptoms and decreases survival. Further, colonization with Akkermansia muciniphila or supplementing with nicotinamide ameliorates ALS symptoms suggesting the microbiome and its metabolites confer protection against neurobehavioral deficits.
  • 17.Ferreiro AL et al. Gut microbiome composition may be an indicator of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Science Translational Medicine 15, eabo2984 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Radjabzadeh D et al. Gut microbiome-wide association study of depressive symptoms. Nat Commun 13, 7128 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hotchkiss MZ, Poulain AJ & Forrest JRK Pesticide-induced disturbances of bee gut microbiotas. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46, fuab056 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Han Y et al. Microplastics exposure causes oxidative stress and microbiota dysbiosis in planarian Dugesia japonica. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 28973–28983 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Williams KB et al. Regulation of axial and head patterning during planarian regeneration by a commensal bacterium. Mechanisms of Development 163, 103614 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leitão-Gonçalves R et al. Commensal bacteria and essential amino acids control food choice behavior and reproduction. PLoS Biol 15, e2000862 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jia Y et al. Gut microbiome modulates Drosophila aggression through octopamine signaling. Nat Commun 12, 2698 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li L et al. Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees. Nat Commun 12, 6588 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Davidson GL et al. Diet induces parallel changes to the gut microbiota and problem solving performance in a wild bird. Sci Rep 10, 20783 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Florkowski MR & Yorzinski JL Gut microbiome diversity and composition is associated with exploratory behavior in a wild-caught songbird. Anim Microbiome 5, 8 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Braniste V et al. The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci Transl Med 6, 263ra158 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vuong HE et al. The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Nature (2020) doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2745-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thion MS et al. Microbiome Influences Prenatal and Adult Microglia in a Sex-Specific Manner. Cell 172, 500–516.e16 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sudo N et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol 558, 263–75 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Erny D et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci 18, 965–977 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Diaz Heijtz R et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 3047–3052 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bravo JA et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 16050–16055 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luczynski P et al. Adult microbiota-deficient mice have distinct dendritic morphological changes: differential effects in the amygdala and hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 44, 2654–2666 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Needham BD et al. A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice. Nature 602, 647–653 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ∙ ∙ Using bacteria that were engineered to produce the microbial metabolite 4-ethylphenyl sulfate (4EPS), researchers discovered 4-EPS crosses the blood brain barrier to decrease brain activity, oligodendrocyte maturation, myelination, and anxiety-like behaviors in mice.
  • 36.Hsiao EY et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 155, 1451–63 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Strandwitz P et al. GABA-modulating bacteria of the human gut microbiota. Nat Microbiol 4, 396–403 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang X et al. Sex- and age-related trajectories of the adult human gut microbiota shared across populations of different ethnicities. Nat Aging 1, 87–100 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hases L et al. High-fat diet and estrogen modulate the gut microbiota in a sex-dependent manner in mice. Commun Biol 6, 1–12 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pronovost GN et al. The maternal microbiome promotes placental development in mice. Science Advances 9, eadk1887 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Argaw-Denboba A et al. Paternal microbiome perturbations impact offspring fitness. Nature 629, 652–659 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Di Gesù CM et al. Maternal gut microbiota mediate intergenerational effects of high-fat diet on descendant social behavior. Cell Reports 41, 111461 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Markle JGM et al. Sex Differences in the Gut Microbiome Drive Hormone-Dependent Regulation of Autoimmunity. Science 339, 1084–1088 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bridgewater LC et al. Gender-based differences in host behavior and gut microbiota composition in response to high fat diet and stress in a mouse model. Sci Rep 7, 10776 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown K et al. Microbiota alters the metabolome in an age- and sex- dependent manner in mice. Nat Commun 14, 1348 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Arpaia N et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature 504, 451–455 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schluter J et al. The gut microbiota is associated with immune cell dynamics in humans. Nature 588, 303–307 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Round JL & Mazmanian SK The gut microbiome shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9, 313–323 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yu LW, Agirman G & Hsiao EY The Gut Microbiome as a Regulator of the Neuroimmune Landscape. Annu Rev Immunol 40, 143–167 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Daneman R & Prat A The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7, a020412 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wallen ZD et al. Metagenomics of Parkinson’s disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms. Nat Commun 13, 6958 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thirion F et al. The gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis varies with disease activity. Genome Medicine 15, 1 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Berer K et al. Commensal microbiota and myelin autoantigen cooperate to trigger autoimmune demyelination. Nature 479, 538–541 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.McVey Neufeld KA, Mao YK, Bienenstock J, Foster JA & Kunze WA The microbiome is essential for normal gut intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability in the mouse. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 25, 183–e88 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McVey Neufeld KA, Perez-Burgos A, Mao YK, Bienenstock J & Kunze WA The gut microbiome restores intrinsic and extrinsic nerve function in germ-free mice accompanied by changes in calbindin. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27, 627–636 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.De Vadder F et al. Gut microbiota regulates maturation of the adult enteric nervous system via enteric serotonin networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, 6458–6463 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gershon MD & Margolis KG The gut, its microbiome, and the brain: connections and communications. J Clin Invest 131, e143768 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Egerod KL et al. Profiling of G protein-coupled receptors in vagal afferents reveals novel gut-to-brain sensing mechanisms. Molecular Metabolism 12, 62–75 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chang RB, Strochlic DE, Williams EK, Umans BD & Liberles SD Vagal Sensory Neuron Subtypes that Differentially Control Breathing. Cell 161, 622–633 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Williams EK et al. Sensory Neurons that Detect Stretch and Nutrients in the Digestive System. Cell 166, 209–221 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kaelberer MM et al. A gut-brain neural circuit for nutrient sensory transduction. Science 361, eaat5236 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li M et al. Gut-brain circuits for fat preference. Nature 610, 722–730 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ∙ This study revealed the TRPA1 expressing vagal neurons and GPR40 and GPR120 receptors expressed on the surface of intestinal EECs mediate preference for dietary fat. A separate subset of vagal neurons and intestinal receptors convey sugar and nutrient preference.
  • 63.Buchanan KL et al. The preference for sugar over sweetener depends on a gut sensor cell. Nat Neurosci 25, 191–200 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sgritta M et al. Mechanisms Underlying Microbial-Mediated Changes in Social Behavior in Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Neuron 101, 246–259.e6 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang J et al. A key role of the subdiaphragmatic vagus nerve in the depression-like phenotype and abnormal composition of gut microbiota in mice after lipopolysaccharide administration. Transl Psychiatry 10, 1–13 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dalile B, Van Oudenhove L, Vervliet B & Verbeke K The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota-gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16, 461–478 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bäckhed F, Manchester JK, Semenkovich CF & Gordon JI Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 979–984 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Guinan J, Wang S, Hazbun TR, Yadav H & Thangamani S Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans. Sci Rep 9, 8872 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.De Vadder F et al. Microbiota-Generated Metabolites Promote Metabolic Benefits via Gut-Brain Neural Circuits. Cell 156, 84–96 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Park J, Wang Q, Wu Q, Mao-Draayer Y & Kim CH Bidirectional regulatory potentials of short-chain fatty acids and their G-protein-coupled receptors in autoimmune neuroinflammation. Sci Rep 9, 8837 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Govindarajan N, Agis-Balboa RC, Walter J, Sananbenesi F & Fischer A Sodium butyrate improves memory function in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model when administered at an advanced stage of disease progression. J Alzheimers Dis 26, 187–197 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang X et al. Sodium butyrate facilitates CRHR2 expression to alleviate HPA axis hyperactivity in autism-like rats induced by prenatal lipopolysaccharides through histone deacetylase inhibition. mSystems 8, e00415–23 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.McCarville JL, Chen GY, Cuevas VD, Troha K & Ayres JS Microbiota Metabolites in Health and Disease. Annu Rev Immunol 38, 147–170 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rothhammer V et al. Microglial control of astrocytes in response to microbial metabolites. Nature 557, 724–728 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Serger E et al. The gut metabolite indole-3 propionate promotes nerve regeneration and repair. Nature 607, 585–592 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ∙ ∙ In a sciatic nerve crush mouse model, intermittent fasting promotes axon regeneration. This corresponded to increases in abundance of the microbial metabolite, indole-3-propionic acid (IPA). IPA supplementation promotes axonal regeneration through recruiting neutrophil chemotaxis and prevents thermal sensory deficits.
  • 76.Asano Y et al. Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303, G1288–1295 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yano JM et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 161, 264–276 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fung TC et al. Intestinal serotonin and fluoxetine exposure modulate bacterial colonization in the gut. Nat Microbiol 4, 2064–2073 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Siragusa S et al. Synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 7283–7290 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bellono NW et al. Enterochromaffin Cells Are Gut Chemosensors that Couple to Sensory Neural Pathways. Cell 170, 185–198.e16 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chen H et al. A Forward Chemical Genetic Screen Reveals Gut Microbiota Metabolites That Modulate Host Physiology. Cell 177, 1217–1231.e18 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ∙ ∙ Using a high-throughput GPCR screening assay, investigators identified over 200 GPCRs that respond to microbial metabolites. Several of these metabolites impact host physiology, such as histamine to histamine receptors increase colonic motility.
  • 82.Chen H et al. Highly multiplexed bioactivity screening reveals human and microbiota metabolome-GPCRome interactions. Cell 186, 3095–3110.e19 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Colosimo DA et al. Mapping Interactions of Microbial Metabolites with Human G-Protein-Coupled Receptors. Cell Host Microbe 26, 273–282.e7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Muller PA et al. Microbiota modulate sympathetic neurons via a gut-brain circuit. Nature 583, 441–446 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ∙ Using viral tracing and cFos labeling of neurons, researchers discovered gut sympathetic neurons project to the brainstem, activation is dependent on the microbiota and convey information about gut motility. A parallel pathway is mediated by vagal afferents.
  • 85.Barki N et al. Chemogenetics defines a short-chain fatty acid receptor gut-brain axis. Elife 11, e73777 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yang D et al. G protein-coupled receptors: structure- and function-based drug discovery. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6, 7 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cammarota G, Ianiro G & Gasbarrini A Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Clin Gastroenterol 48, 693–702 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lee J et al. Young versus aged microbiota transplants to germ-free mice: increased short-chain fatty acids and improved cognitive performance. Gut Microbes 12, 1–14 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Buffington SA et al. Microbial Reconstitution Reverses Maternal Diet-Induced Social and Synaptic Deficits in Offspring. Cell 165, 1762–1775 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Boehme M et al. Microbiota from young mice counteracts selective age-associated behavioral deficits. Nat Aging 1, 666–676 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Siopi E et al. Gut microbiota changes require vagus nerve integrity to promote depressive-like behaviors in mice. Mol Psychiatry 1–11 (2023) doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02071-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kim ES et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates atherosclerosis in mice with C1q/TNF-related protein 9 genetic deficiency. Exp Mol Med 54, 103–114 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Geng Z, Wang X, Wu F, Cao Z & Liu J Biointerface mineralization generates ultraresistant gut microbes as oral biotherapeutics. Science Advances 9, eade0997 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hulme H et al. Microbiome-derived carnitine mimics as previously unknown mediators of gut-brain axis communication. Science Advances 6, eaax6328 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang K et al. Microbial-host-isozyme analyses reveal microbial DPP4 as a potential antidiabetic target. Science 381, eadd5787 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES