Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2024 Jul 11;62(8):e00551-24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00551-24

IgM tests for detecting Treponema pallidum infection in newborns: time to establish a reference comparator

Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz 1, Diana Villarreal 2, Jeffrey D Klausner 2,✉
Editor: Erin McElvania3
PMCID: PMC11323539  PMID: 38990039

LETTER

The prevalence of congenital syphilis has increased by more than 1,000% in the USA since 2012 (1). Establishing the diagnosis of congenital syphilis in a neonate, however, remains challenging. Passive antibody transfer from the mother to the newborn renders testing for treponemal or non-treponemal IgG antibodies difficult to interpret. Thus, treatment is frequently indicated solely based on the presence of syphilis in a mother who received inadequate therapy (2), warranting infant hospitalization and intravenous penicillin for 10 days.

IgM assays detect the presence of antibodies formed early in the course of infection. IgM is too large to cross the placenta, and while IgM tests have historically shown cross-reactivity with other antigens (3), a negative Treponema pallidum IgM in an infant may indicate the absence of infection. Research is needed to evaluate the performance of IgM tests in congenital syphilis.

There are several commercially available IgM T. pallidum assays; however, evaluation of those assays (Table 1) was done without standardizing the comparator or stage of syphilis. Immunoblot assays detect antibodies against proteins of different molecular weight, and are between 63.3% and 95.7% sensitive for syphilis in adults. One small study reported a 100% sensitivity (17/17) and negative predictive value (39/39) for congenital syphilis with neurologic involvement using an IgM immunoblot assay against seven T. pallidum serum antigens (4). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) detect antibodies via antibody-antigen binding, and are between 59.8% and 95.7% sensitive for syphilis in adults. IgM fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption (FTA-Abs) tests studied in the 1970s were between 64.0% and 93.3% sensitive for detecting congenital syphilis (5, 6); however, performance data are not available for current commercially available FTA-Abs IgM assays. Further work is needed to characterize the performance of those IgM tests in cases of congenital syphilis.

TABLE 1.

Commercially available immunoblot and ELISA IgM assays for detecting Treponema palliduma

Test type Manufacturer Antibodies detected Target Performance of IgM component Comparator Reference
Sensitivity Specificity
Immunoblot
 ViraBlot IgG/IgM ViraMed IgG and IgM 4 Lipoprotein antigens (47 kD, 44.5 kD, 17 kD, 15 kD) 5 VDRL antigens (1–5) 94.4% (84/89) 99.2% (245/247)b 19S FTA-ABS (IgM) Manufacturer IFU
 BLOT-LINE Test Line Clinical Diagnostics IgG and IgM 4 Lipoprotein antigens (47 kD, 41 kD, 17 kD, and 15 kD) 95.7%c 95.2%c Not reported Manufacturer IFU
 Euroline-WB IgM Euroimmun IgM 4 Lipoprotein antigens [47 kD, 45 kD (TmpA), 17 kD, 15 kD] 90.0% (45/50)d 97.1% (266/274)d Not reported Manufacturer IFU
 recomLine Mikrogen IgM 6 Lipoprotein antigens [47 kD, 45 kD (TmpA), 17 kD, 15 kD, Tp257 (Gpd), and Tp453] 63.3 (76/120) 96.7 (29/30) RPR, TPA, TP-PA, and/or PCR against polA (7)
 LINE IgM ViroTech IgM 4 Lipoprotein antigens [47 kD, 45 kD (TmpA), 17 kD, 15 kD] 87.4% (83/95) 98.6% (356/361) 19S FTA-ABS (IgM) Manufacturer IFU
ELISA
 recomWell Mikrogen IgM 6 Lipoprotein antigens [47 kD, 45 kD (TmpA), 17 kD, 15 kD, Tp257 (Gpd), and Tp453] 75.0% (90/120) 96.7% (29/30) RPR, TPA, TP-PA, and/or PCR against polA (7)
 EIA T. Pallidum IgM Test Line Clinical Diagnostics IgM 4 Lipoprotein antigens (47 kD, 41 kD, 17 kD, 15 kD) 95.7%c 95.2%c Not reported Manufacturer IFU
 Euroimmun Euroimmun IgM 4 Lipoprotein antigens [47 kD, 45 kD (TmpA), 17 kD, 15 kD] 59.8% (70/117) 100% (30/30) RPR, TPA, TPPA, and/or PCR against polA (7)
a

Abbreviations: VDRL, venereal disease research laboratory; kD, kilodaltons (molecular mass of antigen); FTA-ABS, fluorescent treponema antibody absorption test; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; TPA, Treponema pallidum antibody; TP-PA, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFU, instructions for use.

b

Two were indeterminant; no false positive.

c

Sample size not reported.

d

Borderline results considered positive (n = 12 of positive specimens; n = 6 of negatives specimens).

The European Union and the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV guidelines recommend T. pallidum IgM testing among newborns suspected of having congenital syphilis (8, 9), contrary to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2, 10). Several tests are Conformité Européenne marked in Europe and Therapeutic Goods Administration approved in Australia, but no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved test exists. In fact, there is no reference standard by which a new IgM assay could be assessed. Current FDA serologic reference standards for T. pallidum serologic tests are treponemal IgG or combination IgG/IgM assays (11).

To support the evaluation of T. pallidum IgM tests and test manufacturers’ pursuit of FDA approval, a reference standard must be established. The FDA developed the patient-infected status algorithm to address situations where gold-standard reference tests are unavailable, using a composite standard (12). We recommend the adoption of a composite IgM reference standard based on three test results including two immunoblots and one ELISA or one immunoblot and two ELISAs. At least two positive tests would constitute a positive reference comparator while at least two negative tests would constitute a negative comparator.

IgM assays are needed to address the recent rise in congenital syphilis. Such tests are commercially available and have shown promising performance among adults. However, to support the development and evaluation of such tests, a reference standard in infants must be established.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant #2R01AI139265).

Contributor Information

Jeffrey D. Klausner, Email: jdklausner@med.usc.edu.

Erin McElvania, NorthShore University HealthSystem Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

REFERENCES

  • 1. McDonald R, O’Callaghan K, Torrone E, Barbee L, Grey J, Jackson D, Woodworth K, Olsen E, Ludovic J, Mayes N, Chen S, Wingard R, Johnson Jones M, Drame F, Bachmann L, Romaguera R, Mena L. 2023. Missed opportunities for preventing congenital syphilis - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 72:1269–1274. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7246e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, Reno H, Zenilman JM, Bolan GA. 2021. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep 70:1–187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nielsen CM, Hansen K, Andersen HM, Gerstoft J, Vestergaard BF. 1987. An enzyme labelled nuclear antigen immunoassay for detection of cytomegalovirus IgM antibodies in human serum: specific and non-specific reactions. J Med Virol 22:67–76. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890220109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Michelow IC, Wendel GD Jr, Norgard MV, Zeray F, Leos NK, Alsaadi R, Sánchez PJ. 2002. Central nervous system infection in congenital syphilis. N Engl J Med 346:1792–1798. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Johnston NA. 1972. Neonatal congenital syphilis. Diagnosis by the absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody (IgM) test. Br J Vener Dis 48:464–469. doi: 10.1136/sti.48.6.464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mamunes P, Cave VG, Budell JW, Andersen JA, Steward RE. 1970. Early diagnosis of neonatal syphilis. Evaluation of a gamma M-fluorescent treponemal antibody test. Am J Dis Child 120:17–21. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1970.02100060051005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Osbak KK, Tsoumanis A, De Baetselier I, Van Esbroek M, Smet H, Kenyon CR, Crucitti T. 2020. Role of IgM testing in the diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of syphilis: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 10:e035838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Janier M, Unemo M, Dupin N, Tiplica GS, Potočnik M, Patel R. 2021. 2020 European guideline on the management of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 35:574–588. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Anonymous . 2019. British association for sexual health and HIV. Syphilis 2015. Retrieved 1 Apr 2024. https://www.bashh.org/resources/25/guidelines_syphilis_2015.
  • 10. Papp JR, Park IU, Fakile Y, Pereira L, Pillay A, Bolan GA. 2024. CDC laboratory recommendations for syphilis testing, United States, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 73:1–32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7301a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Anonymous . United States food and drug administration. 510(K) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K153730.pdf. Retrieved 2 Apr 2024.
  • 12. McAdam AJ. 2000. Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test? J Clin Microbiol 38:2027–2029. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.6.2027-2029.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES