Correction to: European Journal of Nutrition
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03366-2
In the original version of this article, in the abstract, second sentence of the result sections which previously read.
One cluster, including twenty percent of the individuals in the sample was identified as a “best compromise” diet with the highest diet quality and the second lowest environmental impacts of all clusters, except for freshwater eutrophication.
Should have read
One cluster, including eighteen percent of the individuals in the sample was identified as a “best compromise” diet with the highest diet quality and the second lowest environmental impacts of all clusters, except for freshwater eutrophication.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s00394-024-03366-2.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.