Abstract
Background
Multiple factors are involved in the pathogenesis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), a chronic cholestatic liver disease, characterized by intrahepatic cholangiopathy. In particular, studies have suggested that environmental factors such as the presence of granulomas in the portal vein region are important for the development of PBC. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze and identify foreign-derived antigens in PBC liver tissue to confirm their involvement in PBC pathogenesis.
Methods
Portal areas and hepatocyte regions were selectively dissected from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded PBC liver tissue samples using the microlaser method, followed by total DNA extraction. We then validated whether the bacterial strains identified through 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis were detected in PBC liver tissues.
Results
The most frequently detected bacterial genera in the PBC liver tissue samples were Sphingomonas panacis, Providencia, and Cutibacterium. These bacterial genera were also detected in the other PBC samples. Validation for the detection of S. panacis, the most abundant genus, revealed polymerase chain reaction bands extracted from the portal areas of all samples. They were also more highly expressed than bands detected in the hepatocyte region.
Conclusion
S. panacis antigen was specifically detected in the portal areas of PBC liver tissues. The introduction of foreign-derived antigens into the liver as an environmental factor could be a possible mechanism for the development of PBC.
Introduction
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by pathological intrahepatic small bile duct damage, the pathogenesis of which remains unknown [1–5]. Multiple factors are believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of PBC, with autoimmune mechanisms being considered the main triggering factors, considering that PBC is often associated with chronic thyroiditis and Sjogren’s syndrome [6–10].
In recent years, extensive genome-wide association studies have been conducted to identify PBC disease-specific genes [11–13]. Other studies identified a locus on the X chromosome that may be involved in the female predominance of PBC, suggesting a genetic predisposition to PBC [14]. Alternatively, a recent case–control study on Japanese patients with PBC and sex- and age-matched controls showed that environmental unsanitation and chronic exposure to chemicals (e.g., smoking and hair dye) during childhood may be risk factors for the development of PBC [15]. Therefore, these environmental factors may also play a major role in the development of PBC [2, 16].
Several types of PBC mouse models have been established, including models in which genetic factors are involved (e.g., NOD.c3c4 mice), models in which autoimmune mechanisms may be involved (e.g., dnTGF-βRII mice), and PBC-like pathologies caused by 2OA, 6BH immunization or Escherichia coli (E.coli) infection 2OA, and 6BH immunization [17]. In line with this, mice with a PBC-like pathology caused by E. coli infection suggest the involvement of environmental factors [18]. Granulomas found within the portal vein region of PBC liver tissues have been identified as key environmental factors [19, 20]. Specifically, studies have detected the presence of Propionibacterium acnes in PBC granulomas [21], identifying urinary tract infections as a risk factor for the development of the disease. Of particular interest is the finding that the corresponding antigen of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), the pyruvate dehydrogenase E2 component (PDC-E2), is conserved across species in these bacteria [22, 23]. This molecular homology strongly supports the role of environmental factors in the development of disease.
Although these studies have suggested that environmental factors are also important in the pathogenesis of PBC, the pathogenesis-associated exogenous antigens present in PBC organisms have not been continuously and universally identified. As such, identifying these exogenous antigens as environmental factors can help elucidate the pathogenesis of PBC, an intractable liver disease, and uncover future therapies.
The current study aimed to comprehensively analyze the exogenous antigens in PBC liver tissues and serum via 16S rRNA metagenome analysis and confirm their involvement in the pathogenesis of PBC.
Materials and methods
PBC sample selection
PBC cases were selected using the following diagnostic criteria: itchy skin, which is a typical clinical manifestation of PBC; elevated serum biliary enzymes and high IgM levels on blood biochemical tests; and positivity for AMA. In addition, cases of histopathologically confirmed PBC with interlobular bile duct lesions and granulomas were included in this study. Cases with histologically concomitant autoimmune hepatitis, severe fibrosis, or noncompensated cirrhosis were excluded. Cases with liver carcinogenesis in the background of PBC were also excluded. The control group comprised healthy volunteers. These PBC cases were diagnosed at Yamagata University Hospital, and liver tissue was used for the study only when permission to use the specimens was obtained from the patients.
Selective laser microdissection
Laser microdissection (LMD), a method used for sectioning extremely small portions of a histopathological specimen, is an ideal technique for molecular analysis involving minute specimens. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of PBC liver tissues collected via liver biopsy were prepared on glass slides with foil (PEN-Membrane Slides, Leica) and stained with hepatoxylin eosin (HE).
From the FFPE liver tissue samples, the portal vein and hepatocyte regions were selectively excised using the LMD method (Leica LMD 6500, Leica MICROSYSTEMS, UV laser cutting) and collected in individual 0.5-mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tubes (PCR-05-C, Axygen). The hepatocyte area was selected and removed from the area without inflammatory cell infiltration. The laser was adjusted to a wavelength of 349 nm to minimize sample damage. The area of the excised portal vein and hepatocyte regions per sample was measured.
DNA extraction from liver tissues and sera
DNA was extracted from the LMD-separated portal vein area and hepatocytes using the MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by Quality check and concentration measurements (Qubit assays, Life Technologies). DNA was also extracted from the PBC sera for validation experiments (QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit, QIAGEN). Concentration measurements and quality check were performed using the same procedure.
16S rRNA sequencing
Multiplex polymerase chain reactions were performed on the extracted DNA samples using two primer pools corresponding to the V2, V4, and V8 regions (amplicon sizes of 250, 288, and 295 bp, respectively) or the V3, V6–7, and V9 regions (amplicon sizes of 215, 260, and 209 bp, respectively) of the 16S rRNA gene (16S metagenomics kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each hypervariable regions (V1-V9 regions) of 16s RNA demonstrate considerable sequence diversity among different bacteria and used for accurate identification. A sequence library was constructed using the IonAmpliSeq library kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To ensure the quality of each library, digital electrophoresis was performed using a D1000 Screen Tape on a 2200 Tape Station (Agilent Technologies). Amplified 30–140 pM libraries were subjected to emulsion PCR, and purified libraries were loaded onto an Ion P1 chip v3, after which ion semiconductor sequencing was performed using an Ion Proton sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To obtain taxonomy assignment, >101 bp read lengths in sequence files were run through the assembly programs constructed using Bowtie2 version 2.3.5, along with consecutive mapping on the Greengenes database (published May 2011, including 16Sr RNA gene sequence information for 406,998 strains). The read depths against the 16S rRNA gene regions were calculated using bedtools software version 2.29.0 and the In House R script.
Validation study
Validation PCR study was performed to detect the bacterial genera identified from the results in the 16S rRNA metagenome analysis results. Primers were designed refer to Sphingomonas paucimobilis and S. panacis reference sequences (NCBI accession AB055142, NZ_CP014168 respectively). The clustalw version 2.1 was used for alignment.
PCR (Agilent 4200 TapeStation, Agilent Technologies) was used to verify whether the bacterial genera identified via 16S rRNA metagenome analysis could be detected in PBC sera and liver tissues using other cohort samples. In particular, we compared whether PCR detection levels differed between the portal vein and hepatocyte regions.
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the research ethics committee of Yamagata University (Approval number: 2021-230) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients and all control subjects for serum and liver tissue prior to participation. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
All accessed data were fully anonymized for research purpose (date 22-Oct-2021).
Statistics and data analysis
We used descriptive statistics to summarize the characteristics of PBC samples and Student’s t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of differences.
Results
Clinical characteristics of the patients
The characteristics of the patients with PBC (n=24) included in this study are summarized in Table 1. As seen in the table, female predominance was apparent, with blood biochemical tests showing elevated transaminase, biliary enzymes, and high IgM levels. All cases tested negative for antinuclear antibodies. The liver tissues showed mild fibrosis.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients with primary biliary cholangitis.
Characteristics | n=24 |
---|---|
Age, years | 54 (40-65) |
Gender, female | 63% |
Biochemical examination | |
T.Bil (mg/dL) | 0.8 (0.5-1.1) |
Alb (g/dL) | 4.1 (3.7-4.3) |
AST (U/L) | 41 (24-75) |
ALT (U/L) | 43 (15-70) |
γ-GTP (U/L) | 270 (91-1201) |
Plt (x104/μL) | 248 (198-278) |
PT-INR | 0.96 (0.84-1.01) |
AMA-M2 (index) | 227 (115-534) |
IgM (mg/dL) | 360 (221-508) |
Parameters are presented as the mean (range). T.Bil, total bilirubin; Alb, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; Plt, platelet count; PT-INR, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio; AMA-M2, anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody; IgM, immunoglobulin M
DNA library in PBC sera
Fig 1A shows that the quality check of the DNA library in E. coli (as a control) and PBC sera detected an amplification read peak at 200–300 bp, which was sufficient for 16S rRNA metagenome analysis. Fig 1B shows the read peak histogram in PBC samples. The final mean DNA concentration was 12 ng/μl for PBC and 15 ng/μl for E. coli.
PBC portal area and hepatocyte area after LMD
A total of 10 PBC liver biopsy samples were sectioned into portal and hepatocellular regions using LMD. Fig 2A shows the PBC liver histology before and after LMD of the portal area, whereas Fig 2B shows the PBC liver histology before and after LMD of the hepatocyte area.
Table 2 presents the total areas of the portal and hepatocellular regions. In all samples, the hepatocyte area was dissected more than the portal vein area. This was the volume of the samples collected, reflecting the proportion of the area in the liver tissue.
Table 2. The total areas of the dissected portal and hepatocyte regions after LMD.
sample | LMD region | LMD area (μm2) |
---|---|---|
PBC1 | Portal | 30,535 |
Hepato | 186,429 | |
PBC2 | Portal | 27,558 |
Hepato | 280,424 | |
PBC3 | Portal | 50,156 |
Hepato | 255,432 | |
PBC4 | Portal | 140,554 |
Hepato | 169,123 | |
PBC5 | Portal | 91,137 |
Hepato | 212,061 | |
PBC6 | Portal | 15,526 |
Hepato | 58.926 | |
PBC7 | Portal | 16,410 |
Hepato | 173,873 | |
PBC8 | Portal | 38,409 |
Hepato | 150,780 | |
PBC9 | Portal | 16,339 |
Hepato | 126,735 | |
PBC10 | Portal | 24,666 |
Hepato | 148,715 | |
Total (mean) | Portal | 45,129 |
Hepato | 176,250 |
16S rRNA metagenome analysis in sera
The following is a list of the most common bacterial genera detected by metagenomic analysis of PBC sera (Table 3). In the PBC group, the most frequently detected reads were Providencia (mean 2578 reads), Sphingomonas (mean 2096 reads), Cupriavidus (mean 372 reads), and Lactobacillus (mean 359 reads). The reads detected in the healthy control group were Providencia (mean 28 reads), Sphingomonas (mean 9.5 reads), Cupriavidus (mean 2.5 reads), and Lactobacillus (mean 160 reads), all of which were significantly higher in the PBC sera. Each of these three alpha-proteobacteria was found to contain sequences of the 16S region in two or more locations, indicating their presence in PBC sera.
Table 3. The list of the most common bacterial genera detected by metagenomic analysis of PBC and healthy control sera (mean read counts).
Genus | Healthy Control (n=3) | PBC (n=24) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Providencia | 28 | 2578.1 | <0.001 |
Sphingomonas | 9.5 | 2096 | <0.001 |
Cupriavidus | 2.5 | 372.2 | <0.001 |
Lactobacillus | 160.5 | 359.3 | <0.001 |
Aquabacterium | 2.5 | 213.2 | <0.001 |
Spirosoma | 6.5 | 200.1 | <0.001 |
Validation study in serum samples
Sphingomonas paucimobilis, the reference species of Sphingomonas, was used as a control for comparison in the validation PCR study. The gene sequences that could detect both S. panacis and S. paucimobilis reference species detected by 16S rRNA metagenome analysis were used as primers (S1 Table), whereas PCR was used to validate the results. Fig 3 shows that S. panacis was detected in the PBC sera of 2 out of the 11 cases (detection rate was 18%).
16S rRNA metagenome analysis in PBC liver tissues
16S rRNA metagenome analysis of 4 PBC liver tissue samples showed that more reads and bacteria were detected in both liver tissues than in the serum samples in Table 4. The most frequently detected bacterial genera were S. panacis (mean: 336,508 reads), Providencia (mean: 254,173 reads), and Cutibacterium (mean: 245,375 reads). These results were similar to those of the phylogenetic analysis of PBC sera, with the three most frequently detected bacteria being the same in all four tissue samples.
Table 4. The detected bacterial genera by 16S rRNA metagenome analysis in PBC liver tissues (mean read counts).
PBC 1 | PBC 2 | PBC 3 | PBC 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sphingomonas panacis | 537,934 | 346,982 | 258,339 | 202,780 |
Providencia | 324,427 | 347,571 | 183,687 | 161,007 |
Cutibacterium | 233,392 | 388,344 | 126,194 | 233,570 |
Homo | 36,807 | 43,660 | 71,712 | 14,843 |
Bradyrhizobium | 14,768 | 11,841 | 12,684 | 13,179 |
Staphylococcus | 14,117 | 32,936 | 20,907 | 13,426 |
Acinetobacter | 6,517 | 4,401 | 914 | 841 |
Scardovia | 6,092 | 13,545 | 5,553 | 1,471 |
Corynebacterium | 5,370 | 13,563 | 31,572 | 4,394 |
Bacillus | 3,289 | 4,331 | 1,836 | 1,808 |
Methylorubrum | 3,213 | 3,211 | 1,224 | 1,308 |
Streptococcus | 2,290 | 3,039 | 312 | 15 |
Burkholderia | 1,963 | 2,579 | 991 | 1,335 |
Lawsonella | 1,814 | 6,280 | 20,324 | 8,989 |
Bartonella | 1,784 | 1,605 | 772 | 676 |
Brevundimonas | 1,682 | 30 | 10 | 26 |
Gluconobacter | 1,518 | 2,164 | 2,309 | 334 |
Candidatus_hamiltonella | 1,216 | 108 | 2 | 3 |
Ralstonia | 1,064 | 381 | 15 | 1,237 |
Planococcus | 987 | 2,623 | 755 | 1,770 |
Thalassospira | 979 | 1140 | 774 | 528 |
Devosia | 881 | 714 | 520 | 51 |
Clostridium | 700 | 555 | 463 | 279 |
Chloracidobacterium | 647 | 480 | 262 | 188 |
Paenibacillus | 586 | 1,026 | 4 | 4 |
Segniliparus | 580 | 2,517 | 14 | 1 |
Stenotrophomonas | 579 | 435 | 288 | 194 |
Validation study in liver tissues
To validate the conventional PCR findings in PBC liver tissues, six samples were used to compare the detection sensitivity of the hepatocellular and portal regions. Fig 4A shows a comparison of the concentration of the PCR-amplified product (280 bp) of DNA extracted from the portal and hepatocellular regions. The PCR band extracted from the portal region was detected in all the samples. The concentration of S. panacis band detected in the portal region was higher than that of the band detected in the hepatocyte region in all samples. Furthermore, when the concentration of the PCR-detected bands was standardized between the hepatocellular and portal areas of each LMD section, the PCR product extracted from the portal area was significantly more highly expressed than that from the hepatocellular area (Fig 4B).
Discussion
PBC, drug-induced sarcoidosis, and viral hepatitis have been shown to promote the formation of epithelial granulomas in the liver [24–27]. Granulomas, which are composed of macrophage-derived epithelial cells and lymphocytes, exhibit the characteristics of a type IV allergy given that they are predisposed to bacterial infection and foreign body invasion. Therefore, we examined whether the formation of granulomas in PBC is triggered by foreign antigen invasion (i.e., the involvement of environmental factors in the development of PBC).
The current study evaluated PBC cases with typical histopathology and performed LMD selectively in the portal vein and hepatocyte areas of the liver tissue. The portal vein region contained granulomas, CNSDC (damaged bile ducts), and inflammation-inducing cells (mainly lymphocytes). After performing 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis to detect foreign-derived antigens, we found that S. panacis was the most frequently detected bacterial genus in the portal vein region. The highest number of reads was detected in all PBC liver tissue samples examined in this study. Furthermore, 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis of serum from PBC and controls showed that S. panacis was more frequently detected in the PBC group, although the number of detected reads was lower than that in liver tissue. Finally, S. panacis was detected specifically in the portal vein region of the liver tissues via PCR in both the portal vein and hepatocyte regions. Furthermore, even after standardization of the LMD cut-out area, the expression of S. panacis in the portal vein region was clearly different.
PBC is a multifactorial disease, indicating that several factors are involved in its pathogenesis, including autoimmune mechanisms, genetic predisposition, and environmental factors [2]. Among these factors, urinary tract infection has long been reported as a risk factor for the development of PBC. E.coli has been the predominant causative pathogen in most cases of urinary tract infections. Moreover, ample evidence has shown that E.coli infection is an important factor in disrupting immunological tolerance of mitochondria through molecular mimicry between human and E.coli E2 subunits of the 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complex, the major autoantigen for AMA, leading to the production of disease-specific autoantibodies for AMA and PBC [28]. Studies have suggested that bacterial infections, such as E.coli, which retain PDC-E2 molecular homology, may induce immune abnormalities by introducing foreign-derived antigens into the body. S. panacis, which was highly expressed, is a member of the genus Sphingomonas, which is the same genus as Novosphingomonas previously reported to be detected in PBC sera. These results strongly indicate that molecular homology in the corresponding antigens and the mechanism of immune tolerance breakdown after infection are involved in the PBC pathogenesis. S. panacis, a bacterium normally found in soil and other sources, may be pathogenic [29]. In particular, cohort studies examining PBC environmental factors have reported differences in early childhood hygiene as a risk factor for developing PBC, which may be associated with the environment to which S. panacis is likely to be exposed. Sustained bacterial exposure may promote persistent in vivo entry of exogenous antigens, which may cause excessive antibody production and induction of inflammation by AMA-responsive antigens.
S. panacis, newly detected in this study, is consistent with previous reports at the genus level and appears to be an important bacterium involved in environmental factors of hygiene and infection.
In addition, selective LMD of the portal and hepatocellular regions of PBC liver tissues demonstrated that S. panacis was rarely expressed in the hepatocellular region and expression was restricted to the portal region. This could be a possible mechanism by which foreign-derived antigens enter the liver via the important hepatic inflow pathways of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and lymphatic vessels and trigger the development of PBC. Granulomas are type IV allergic reactions that are typically unresponsive to the original antigen in vivo. Therefore, granuloma formation can be attributed to the influx of antigens from outside the body via a pathway wherein the initial reaction, such as an infection, culminates in an allergic reaction. Given that the portal region is home to various cells that engage in dynamic reactions, large amounts or chronic persistent exposure to foreign antigens could likely cause abnormal reactions.
A limitation of this study was the small number of cases in the validation experiment. Further validation of the number of cases is needed.
The current study showed that PBC may be triggered by bacteria. Elucidating the pathophysiology and pathogenesis of PBC, an intractable liver disease, could facilitate the development of effective treatments that promote better outcomes in the future.
Supporting information
Data Availability
"All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files."
Funding Statement
Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Research on Measures for Intractable Diseases (from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C (23K07409) from JSPS.
References
- 1.Lleo A, Wang GQ, Gershwin ME, Hirschfield GM. Primary biliary cholangitis. Lancet. 2020;396:1915–26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31607-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lleo A, Leung PSC, Hirschfield GM, Gershwin ME. The Pathogenesis of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Comprehensive Review. Semin Liver Dis. 2020;40:34–48. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tanaka A. Current understanding of primary biliary cholangitis. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2021;27:1–21. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Younossi ZM, Bernstein D, Shiffman ML, Kwo P, Kim WR, Kowdley KV, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Primary Biliary Cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:48–63. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0390-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mayo MJ. Mechanisms and molecules: What are the treatment targets for primary biliary cholangitis? Hepatology. 2022;76:518–531. doi: 10.1002/hep.32405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gulamhusein AF, Hirschfield GM. Primary biliary cholangitis: pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:93–110. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0226-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carbone M, Milani C, Gerussi A, Ronca V, Cristoferi L, Invernizzi P. Primary biliary cholangitis: a multifaceted pathogenesis with potential therapeutic targets. J Hepatol. 2020;73:965–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Selmi C, Gershwin ME, Lindor KD, et al. Quality of life and everyday activities in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46:1836–43 doi: 10.1002/hep.21953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cordell HJ, Fryett JJ, Ueno K, Darlay R, Aiba Y, Hitomi Y, et al. An international genome-wide meta-analysis of primary biliary cholangitis : Novel risk loci and candidate drugs. J Hepatol. 2021;75:572–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tanaka A, Leung PS, Young HA, Gershwin ME. Toward solving the etiological mystery of primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatol Commun. 2017;275–287. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hitomi Y, Ueno K, Aiba Y, Nishida N, Kono M, Sugihara M, et al. A genome-wide association study identified PTPN2 as a population-specific susceptibility gen locus for primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2024. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000894 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hitomi Y, Nakamura M. The Genetics of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A GWAS and Post-GWAS Update. Genes. 2023;14:405. doi: 10.3390/genes14020405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hitomi Y, Aiba Y, Ueno K, Nishida N, Kawai Y, Kawashima M, et al. rs9459874 and rs1012656 in CCR6/FGFR1OP confer susceptibility to primary biliary cholangitis. J Autoimmun. 2022;126:102775 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Asselta R, Paraboschi EM, Gerussi A, Cordell HJ, Mells GF, Sandford RN, et al. X chromosome contribution to the genetic architecture of primary biliary cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:2483–2495.e26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsumoto K, Ohfuji S, Abe M, Komori A, Takahashi A, Fujii H, et al. Environ- mental factors, medical and family history, and comorbidities associated with primary biliary cholangitis in Japan : a multicenter case-control study. J Gastroenterol. 2022;57:19–29. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01836-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tanaka A, Leung PS, Gershwin ME. Environmental basis of primary biliary cholangitis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2018;243:184–9. doi: 10.1177/1535370217748893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katsumi T, Tomita K, Leung PS, Yang GX, Gershwin ME, Ueno Y. Animal models of primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2015;48:142–153. doi: 10.1007/s12016-015-8482-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Banales JM, Huebert RC, Karlsen T, Strazzabosco M, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ. Cholangiocyte pathobiology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol.2019;16:269–281. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0125-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iordache A, Fuursted K, Rift CV, Rasmussen A, Willemoe GL, Hasselby JP. Hepatic granulomas following liver transplantation: A retrospective survey, and analysis of possible microbiological etiology. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;255:155201. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mironova M, Gopalakrishna H, Rodriguez Franco G, Holland SM, Koh C, Kleiner DE, et al. Granulomatou liver diseases. Hepatol Commun. 2024;8:e0392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Harada K, Tsuneyama K, Sudo Y, Masuda S, Nakanuma Y. Molecular identification of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene in liver tissue of primary biliary cirrhosis: is Propionibacterium acnes involved in granuloma formation? Hepatology. 2001;33:530–536. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.22653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Colapietro F, Lleo A, Generali E.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022;63:166–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tanaka A, Leung PSC, Gershwin ME.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;34–35:3-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lamps LW. Hepatic Granulomas: A Review With Emphasis on Infectious Causes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:867–75. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0123-RA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ungprasert P, Crowson CS, Simonetto DA, Matteson EL. Clinical characteristics and outcome of hepatic sarcoidosis: A population-based study 1976-2013. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112:1556–63. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kleiner DE, Chalasani NP, Lee WM, Fontana RJ, Bonkovsky HL, Watkins PB, et al. Hepatic histological findings in suspected drug-induced liver injury: Systematic evaluation and clinical associations. Hepatology. 2014;59:661–70. doi: 10.1002/hep.26709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, Champiat S, Mateus C, Lambotte O, et al. Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1181–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tanaka A, Leung PSC, Gershwin ME. Pathogen infections and primary biliary cholangitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019;195:25–34. doi: 10.1111/cei.13198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim YJ, Park JY, Balusamy SR, Huo Y, Nong LK, Thi Le H, et al. Comprehensive Genome Analysis on the Novel Species Sphingomonas panacis DCY99TReveals Insights into Iron Tolerance of Ginseng. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2019. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]