Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2024 Aug 20;15:7120. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51394-7

Author Correction: Deep brain stimulation of symptom-specific networks in Parkinson’s disease

Nanditha Rajamani 1,, Helen Friedrich 2,3, Konstantin Butenko 2, Till Dembek 2,4, Florian Lange 5, Pavel Navrátil 5, Patricia Zvarova 1,6, Barbara Hollunder 1,6,7, Rob M A de Bie 8, Vincent J J Odekerken 8, Jens Volkmann 5, Xin Xu 9, Zhipei Ling 10, Chen Yao 11, Petra Ritter 1,6,7,12, Wolf-Julian Neumann 1, Georgios P Skandalakis 13,14, Spyridon Komaitis 14,15, Aristotelis Kalyvas 14,16, Christos Koutsarnakis 14, George Stranjalis 14, Michael Barbe 4, Vanessa Milanese 17,18,19, Michael D Fox 2,20,21, Andrea A Kühn 1,6,7, Erik Middlebrooks 22, Ningfei Li 1, Martin Reich 5, Clemens Neudorfer 1,2,20,21, Andreas Horn 1,2,20,21
PMCID: PMC11335934  PMID: 39164294

Correction to: Nature Communications 10.1038/s41467-024-48731-1, published online 31 May 2024

The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 2, in which the statistical analyses in the insets of panel B were incorrectly reported. Permutation tests were inadvertently reported instead of circular tests and cross-validation values.

The correct version of Figure 2 is:graphic file with name 41467_2024_51394_Figa_HTML.jpg

Which replaces the previous incorrect version:graphic file with name 41467_2024_51394_Figb_HTML.jpg

The original version of this Article contained an error in the text in the third paragraph of the results section ‘Symptom-Response Multi-Tract Model (Discovery Cohort)’ on page 3, which incorrectly read ‘Here, all symptom tracts significantly explained more variance in outcomes than re-calculated tract models after permuting improvement values across patients 1000 times (p < 0.001). Second, we subjected tract models to cross-validations. Here, all but the tremor tract model explained statistically significant amounts of variance when subjected to 10-fold cross-validations (bradykinesia: R = 0.20, p = 0.02; rigidity R = 0.20, p = 0.02; axial symptoms R = 0.22, p = 0.01, also see Fig. 2)’.

The correct version states ‘Here, the bradykinesia and rigidity tracts significantly explained more variance in outcomes than re-calculated tract models after permuting improvement values across patients 1,000 times (p < 0.05). Second, we subjected tract models to cross-validations. Here, all but the tremor tract model explained statistically significant amounts of variance when subjected to 10-fold cross-validations (bradykinesia: R = 0.20, p = 0.02; rigidity R = 0.20, p = 0.02; axial symptoms R = 0.22, p = 0.01, also see Fig. 2)’.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the text in the figure legend of Figure 2 for panel B, which incorrectly read ‘B Symptom-response tracts visualized separately at the STN level with the other tracts grayed out for spatial comparison. Insets represent permutation tests and 10-fold cross-validation results for each symptom tract’.

The correct version states ‘B Symptom-response tracts visualized separately at the STN level with the other tracts grayed out for spatial comparison. Insets represent circular and 10-fold cross-validation results for each symptom tract’.

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES