Abstract
The proteomic response of a threonine-overproducing mutant of Escherichia coli was quantitatively analysed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Evidently, 12 metabolic enzymes that are involved in threonine biosynthesis showed a significant difference in intracellular protein level between the mutant and native strain. The level of malate dehydrogenase was more than 30-fold higher in the mutant strain, whereas the synthesis of citrate synthase seemed to be severely inhibited in the mutant. Therefore, in the mutant, it is probable that the conversion of oxaloacetate into citrate was severely inhibited, but the oxidation of malate to oxaloacetate was significantly up-regulated. Accumulation of oxaloacetate may direct the metabolic flow towards the biosynthetic route of aspartate, a key metabolic precursor of threonine. Synthesis of aspartase (aspartate ammonia-lyase) was significantly inhibited in the mutant strain, which might lead to the enhanced synthesis of threonine by avoiding unfavourable degradation of aspartate to fumarate and ammonia. Synthesis of threonine dehydrogenase (catalysing the degradation of threonine finally back to pyruvate) was also significantly down-regulated in the mutant. The far lower level of cystathionine β-lyase synthesis in the mutant seems to result in the accumulation of homoserine, another key precursor of threonine. In the present study, we report that the accumulation of important threonine precursors, such as oxaloacetate, aspartate and homoserine, and the inhibition of the threonine degradation pathway played a critical role in increasing the threonine biosynthesis in the E. coli mutant.
Keywords: Escherichia coli mutant, proteomic response, threonine biosynthesis, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE)
Abbreviations: ASPA, aspartate ammonia-lyase; 2-DE, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; IPG, immobilized pH gradient; MALDI–TOF-MS, matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry; METC, cystathione β-lyase; TDH, threonine dehydrogenase
INTRODUCTION
The industrial production of amino acids using micro-organisms has expanded in terms of both the amount and number of amino acids [1–4]. Threonine is an essential amino acid necessary for the growth and maintenance of birds and mammals, and has been introduced in the agricultural industry for balancing the livestock feed [2,5]. Since the chemical synthesis does not give a high yield, industrial production of threonine has been dependent on microbial fermentation [6–8]. Previously, for increasing the yield/productivity of amino acid biosynthesis, efforts were focused more on the metabolic engineering and genetic manipulation, along with the help of increasing genome databases for diverse micro-organisms significantly [9]. Furthermore, the specific genes related to threonine biosynthesis have been cloned from various bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum and Brevibacterium sp. [2,10–12]. Although it has long been known by molecular studies on the synthetic pathways of E. coli that threonine biosynthesis from aspartate requires the five-step metabolic conversion, important and novel characteristics for metabolic flux control have remained uncovered.
Several E. coli strains for fermentation of L-threonine were also developed through multiple rounds of mutation programmes that aimed at blocking threonine degradation pathways [6,13,14]. The results of kinetic studies of all the five key enzymes from a thiaisoleucine-resistant derivative of E. coli strain K12 have been reported [15], and the rational design of pathway modifications has been extensively simulated [16–18]. Despite all these efforts, strategies of mutagenesis and screening for threonine overproduction have not been established because the occurrence of undefined mutations may be accompanied in strain development [6,15,19]. For this reason, more systematic approaches have been taken through proteome analysis using 2-DE (two-dimensional gel electrophoresis) followed by MS. The 2-DE technique has been improved for comparative proteomics, requiring the reproducibility and reliability of differential protein expression analysis among samples [20–22]. Although there have been some reports on the comprehensive view of the physiological state and responses of E. coli metabolism in the fermentation process using proteomics tools [23,24], the proteomic approach for building a quantitative dynamic analysis and the metabolic synthetic pathway is still at an early stage of development. Nevertheless, the extended proteomics (along with the ever-increasing amount of protein sequence data and enhanced MS technology) have been proposed elsewhere as a powerful tool for the predictions and simulation of various metabolic pathways for active metabolic network [25,26].
In the present study, the proteomic responses of a threonine-overproducing mutant were studied in detail by analysing quantitatively the time-course synthesis of metabolic enzymes for threonine biosynthesis. Comparative proteome analysis showed that the threonine overproduction resulted from the significant change in the synthesis of important metabolic enzymes involved in threonine biosynthesis. Also, the correlation between degradation/accumulation of threonine (or its precursors) and the threonine overproduction has been demonstrated in detail.
EXPERIMENTAL
Bacterial strains
E. coli W3110 [F−IN(rrnD-rrnE) rpoS−], which produces a negligible level of threonine (<0.1 mM), was used as a parent strain for comparative analysis [27]. The threonine-producing mutant E. coli (Met−IleL AHVr AECr ACr ABAr rpoS−) was obtained from a previously constructed threonine-producing E. coli strain, TF427 [27], by mutations performed using N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. This strain requires both methionine and isoleucine for growth. E. coli Hfr 3000 YA73 (thrB relA1 spoT1 thi-1) was used for cloning of the thr operon [28].
Sample preparations from batch culture of E. coli
Strains were routinely grown in Luria–Bertani medium or M9 medium [28]. If necessary, ampicillin was used at a final concentration of 100 g/ml. E. coli W3110 and its threonine-producing mutant were grown in a 5-litre jar fermenter containing 1.5 litres of fermentation medium [70 g of glucose, 10 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2 g of KH2PO4, 0.5 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 5 mg of FeSO4·7H2O, 5 mg of MnSO4·4H2O, 3 g of yeast extract and 800 mg of methionine per litre of water at pH 6.0] [27]. A seed culture was grown at 33 °C for 4 h in a 500 ml flask containing 75 ml of modified Luria–Bertani medium and then inoculated into a 5-litre jar fermenter. During the cultivation, a mixture of glucose and phosphate at final concentrations of 60 and 0.5 g/l respectively was fed twice when the glucose level was <5 g/l. During the batch fermentation, the pH was maintained at 6.0 with NH4OH, the temperature was maintained at 31 °C, the aeration rate was 1 vvm (air volume·working volume−1·min−1), and the agitation speed was 800 rev./min. Cells were harvested at the different growth phases and adjusted to A600 0.8 with 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0), 100 ml of which was centrifuged at 2510 g and 4 °C for 5 min and then washed twice with 40 mM Tris buffer including 1 mM PMSF. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer [8 M urea/4% (w/v) CHAPS/40 mM Tris/protease inhibitor cocktail solution; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany]. After sonication for 2 min on ice, the cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 25750 g for 60 min. The protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Hercules, CA, U.S.A.) using BSA as a standard. The supernatants were kept at −80 °C until used for 2-DE. Proteins (100 μg) were resuspended in rehydration solution (8 M urea/2% CHAPS/0.005% Bromophenol Blue; final volume, 350 μl). Urea, CHAPS, Tris, dithiothreitol, Bromophenol Blue, Triton X-100 and SDS were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.).
2-DE and image analysis
The first step of 2-DE, isoelectric focusing, was performed on a Pharmacia Biotech IPGphor Electrophoresis System (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) at 20 °C. Linear pH 4–7 IPG (immobilized pH gradient) gel strips (18 cm; Amersham Biosciences) were rehydrated overnight by placing the strips gel-side-down in sample-containing rehydration solution in the IPGphor strip holder and covering with the DryStrip Cover Fluid (Amersham Biosciences). The samples were loaded with 100 μg of intracellular protein concentrations for silver-stained gels with Seeblue plus2 marker (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.). Isoelectric focusing was performed for 2 h at 500 V, for 0.5 h at 1000 V, for 0.5 h at 2000 V, for 0.5 h at 4000 V and finally maintained at 70000 V·h at 8000 V in the IPGphor for analytical and preparative gels. Next, the IPG gel strips were equilibrated for 15 min in equilibration solution [50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.8/6 M urea/30% (v/v) glycerol/2% (w/v) SDS/Bromophenol Blue trace] in 1% dithiothreitol for 15 min, and then in 2.5% (w/v) iodoacetamide for 15 min. Equilibrated gel strips were placed on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel, and the second-dimensional separation was performed using a PROTEAN II Xi cell system (Bio-Rad) in a cold chamber at 4 °C. SDS/PAGE was performed at 30 mA/gel for 12 h until the Bromophenol Blue reached to the bottom of the gel. The silver stain was performed using the modified method as described in [29]. Stained gels were scanned using UMAX powerlook 1100 scanner. ImageMaster software v 4.01 (Amersham Biosciences) was used for the gel image analysis, including quantification of the spot intensities that is performed on a volume basis (i.e. values were calculated from the integration of spot optical intensity over the spot area).
MALDI–TOF-MS (matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry) analysis and protein identification
Samples for the MALDI–TOF-MS analysis were extracted from silver-stained spots as described previously [30]. Enzymic digestions were performed overnight at 37 °C in stationary incubator using 10–15 μg of sequencing-grade modified trypsin/ml (Proma, WI, U.S.A.) in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0). In-gel-digested peptide fragments were extracted from gel pieces using 5% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid and 50% (v/v) acetonitrile mixture, followed by vortex-mixing for 1 h. After repeatedly washing for three times, solute materials including peptide fragments were dried by vacuum centrifugation. Ziptip column (Millipore, Bedford, MA, U.S.A.) in which C18 resin is fixed at the end of the tip was used to eliminate impurities of samples. The peptide solution was prepared with an equal volume of saturated α-cynao-4-hydroxycinnamic acid solution in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid on a sample plate of MALDI–TOF-MS. Protein was analysed using MALDI–TOF-MS system (Voyager DE-STR, PE Biosystem, Framingham, MA, U.S.A.). Spectra were calibrated using a matrix and tryptic autodigestion ion peaks as internal standards. Peptide mass fingerprints were analysed using the MS-Fit (http://prospector.ucsf.edu/). The identification of a protein with respect to theoretical parameters (pI, molecular mass etc.) was accepted if the peptide mass matched with a mass tolerance within 10 p.p.m. The accessibility of such data has been revolutionized by the use of Internet methods such as SWISS-2D-PAGE (http://www.expasy.org/).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Comparative proteome analysis: mutant versus native strain
Prior to 2-DE analysis, both wild-type and mutant strains of E. coli W3110 were cultivated in a batch bioreactor (5 litres). The mutant strain overproduced threonine to >70–80 g/l in the batch culture, despite severely inhibited cell growth (results not shown). Similar growth inhibition was reported for several bacterial mutants overproducing amino acids (lysine, isoleucine and valine) [1,31].
The culture broth of each of the wild-type and mutant strains was harvested at three different growth stages [i.e. early exponential growth phase (EE), middle exponential growth phase (ME) and early stationary phase (ES)], and total intracellular proteins were extracted from disrupted cell pellets after centrifugation. For each protein sample, two-dimensional SDS/PAGE was repeated 4–8 times, and after silver staining an average 2-DE image was constructed for comparative image analysis using the software ImageMaster (Amersham Biosciences). On every average gel image, approx. 1000 spots were visualized and the 2-DE images for the wild-type and mutant strains were systematically compared at each growth stage (EE, ME or ES). Through this comparative image analysis, we noticed that 101 intracellular proteins showed more than 30% difference in spot intensity between the wild-type and the mutant E. coli. MALDI–TOF analysis for each protein spot and subsequent peptide mass fingerprinting using Expasy database enabled identification of 12 metabolic enzymes out of the 101 proteins, as listed in Table 1, which are involved in glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle and threonine biosynthesis (Figure 1). The time-course variation of the spot intensities of the 12 metabolic enzymes was estimated as presented in Figure 2 (panels 1–12). It is surprising to note that the difference in each enzyme level (spot intensity) between wild-type and mutant strain was more than 30-fold (Figure 2). It seems, therefore, reasonable to presume that the threonine oversynthesis resulted from altered conversion rate of key metabolic intermediates causing significant flux changes.
Table 1. The 12 metabolic enzymes involved in the 101 proteins showing more than 30% difference in intracellular protein level (i.e. spot intensity) between the mutant and wild-type strains.
After comparative analyses of 2-DE images, 101 protein spots were selected, and proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting after MALDI-TOF analysis. Accession number refers to the Swiss-PROT database. MM, molecular mass.
| Spot no. | Gene name | Protein name | pI | MM (kDa) | Database accession no. | Mass matched (%)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASPA | Aspartate ammonia-lyase (aspartase) | 5.2 | 52.36 | P04422 | 58.8 |
| 2 | TDH | Threonine dehydrogenase | 5.9 | 37.24 | P07913 | 76.9 |
| 3 | YJGB | Hypothetical zinc-type alcohol dehydrogenase | 5.9 | 36.50 | P27250 | 57.1 |
| 4 | PFKB | Phosphofuctokinase-2 | 5.7 | 32.39 | P06999 | 66.7 |
| 5 | DAPA | Dihydropicolinate synthetase | 5.8 | 31.37 | P05640 | 64.3 |
| 6 | METC | Cystathionine β-lyase | 6.0 | 43.21 | P06721 | 78.9 |
| 7 | GLTA | Citrate synthase | 6.2 | 48.06 | P00891 | 76.9 |
| 8 | PYKF | Pyruvate kinase (PK-1) | 5.8 | 50.73 | P14178 | 62.5 |
| 9 | LEUC | 3-Isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit (isopropylmalate isomerase) | 5.9 | 49.91 | P30127 | 69.2 |
| 10 | ADHC | Alcohol dehydrogenase | 5.9 | 39.36 | P25437 | 70.6 |
| 11 | ACCA | Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase | 5.8 | 35.24 | P30867 | 58.8 |
| 12 | MDH | Malate dehydrogenase | 5.8 | 29.99 | P06994 | 61.5 |
* Mass tolerance in protein identification through peptide mass fingerprinting was 10 p.p.m.
Figure 1. Silver-stained two-dimensional SDS/polyacrylamide gels showing 12 metabolic enzyme spots listed in Table 1.
EE, early exponential growth phase; ME, middle exponential growth phase; ES, early stationary phase.
Figure 2. Time-course variations in spot intensity of 12 metabolic enzymes (1–12) in both mutant and wild-type.
Black and striped columns indicate spot intensity from mutant and wild-type respectively. The encircled gel spots are the constantly visualized spots both in wild-type and mutant.
Estimation of threonine overproduction metabolism in the E. coli mutant
By comparative analysis between two E. coli proteomes, it was possible to observe the differences in metabolic enzyme synthesis related to threonine biosynthesis and understand how the metabolic flux has been changed in E. coli mutant. As presented below, we described modified metabolic pathways of threonine-overproducing E. coli mutant on the basis of the differences in synthesis level of metabolic enzymes catalysing threonine synthesis and degradation.
Metabolic pathway from glucose to aspartate
On comparison with the wild-type proteome, we noticed that synthesis levels of citrate synthase and malate dehydrogenase of the mutant were significantly different, i.e. a negligible synthesis of citrate synthase (Figure 2, panel 7) and more than 35-fold increase in malate dehydrogenase synthesis level (Figure 2, panel 12) in the mutant. As illustrated in Scheme 1(a), it is therefore reasonable to assume that a significant amount of oxaloacetate accumulates in the mutant and hence the overall metabolic flow seems to be directed towards the aspartate biosynthetic route. The unusual accumulation of oxaloacetate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle seems to cause the metabolic imbalance that may explain the repressed growth of the threonine-overproducing mutant. It has been reported that uncontrolled or deregulated metabolic pathways lead to metabolic imbalance and suboptimal productivity [32,33], and hence the alteration of metabolic enzyme synthesis could disturb the balanced metabolite flux and might exert a significant burden on an optimal cellular growth.
Scheme 1. Proposed overview of altered metabolic pathways of mutant, showing conversion of (a) glucose into aspartate and (b) aspartate into threonine.
Thick arrow represents that the metabolic conversion was significantly activated. Probably this is due to increased protein level (i.e. spot intensity) of the corresponding metabolic enzyme. Also, cross mark indicates that the metabolic conversion was severely repressed. The cause for this may be a far lowered protein level of the corresponding metabolic enzyme.
We also observed that the protein level of phosphofructokinase-2 (spot 4) catalysing the conversion of fructose 6-phosphate into fructose 1,6-bisphosphate was 380-fold higher in the mutant at the early stationary phase of growth (Figure 2, panel 4, and Scheme 1a). Similarly, another enzyme in the glycolysis pathway, pyruvate kinase (spot 8) was also oversynthesized in the mutant (Figure 2, panel 8, and Scheme 1a). The increased synthesis of glycolytic enzymes might result from the cellular effort to overcome the metabolic imbalance in tricarboxylic acid cycle, discussed above. That is, the mutant catabolism might be modulated towards increasing the supply of pyruvate and hence acetyl-CoA as a means to restore the reduced synthesis of citrate, although the repressed cell growth was inevitable during the cultivation. At the same time, other metabolic enzymes such as isopropylmalate isomerase (spot 9), alcohol dehydrogenase (spot 10), zinc-type alcohol dehydrogenase (spot 3), and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (spot 11) were oversynthesized to expedite probably the conversion of excessively accumulated pyruvate or acetyl-CoA, if any (Scheme 1a).
Metabolic pathway from aspartate to threonine
Threonine biosynthesis from aspartate was performed through five metabolic steps under the control of five key enzymes (i.e. aspartate kinase, aspartate semialdehyde dehydrogenase, homoserine dehydrogenase, homoserine kinase and threonine synthase) [34,35]. It is well known that the activity of aspartate kinase is regulated via negative feedback control by threonine and, moreover, homoserine dehydrogenase and homoserine kinase are partially repressed by accumulated threonine in E. coli pathway [15]. Based on this regulation mechanism, the more threonine-productive E. coli strains were developed by either introducing the feedback-resistant enzymes (i.e. aspartate kinase, homoserine dehydrogenase and homoserine kinase that are insensitive to threonine inhibition) or gene expression amplification of the cognate key enzymes [2,15,18,35,36]. On the other hand, inhibition of the threonine degradation pathway may be another effective way of increasing threonine production level, although this approach has not been reported with detailed metabolic analysis. As discussed below, we observed the significant repression of metabolic degradation of threonine and its precursors, which seems to contribute significantly towards the threonine oversynthesis in the mutant strain.
Aspartate is converted into either fumarate or aspartyl β-phosphate, which is an intermediate precursor in the threonine synthetic route (Scheme 1b). Figure 2 (panel 1) shows that the synthesis of aspartase (aspartate ammonia-lyase, ASPA) was significantly inhibited in the mutant strain. Accumulated aspartate might be metabolized towards synthesizing threonine without unfavourable degradation to fumarate and ammonia (Scheme 1b). Even in the wild-type strain, the synthesis of ASPA was noticed only in the early exponential growth phase (EE) (Figure 2, panel 1). The reason is not clear, but it can be presumed that degradation of aspartate rarely occurs during the post-EE period, when there must be increased cellular need for the major amino acids (as the aspartate family) to support active cell growth and cellular maintenance. This finding that ASPA synthesis occurs only in the EE period is somewhat coincident with the previous report that under initial non-steady-state conditions, the pathway flux of aspartate consumption exhibits greater sensitivity to the aspartate concentration compared with the threonine concentration [15,18].
The time-course profile of TDH (threonine dehydrogenase) synthesis that is responsible for the degradation of threonine is quite similar to the case of ASPA in both the wild-type and mutant strains (Figure 2, panel 2). For the wild-type strain, augmented cellular requirements for threonine after the EE period seemed to induce the repression of TDH synthesis (Scheme 1b). The TDH synthesis was repressed all the time during the whole period of the mutant growth (Figure 2, panel 2), which must be a more favourable condition for the threonine overproduction without breakdown to aminoacetone.
The altered enzyme synthesis for threonine overproduction can also be elucidated with Figure 2 (panel 6) and Scheme 1(b). As presented in Scheme 1(b), METC (cystathionine β-lyase) catalyses the conversion of cystathionine into homocysteine that is finally converted into methionine. In the wild-type E. coli, the synthesis of METC was highly promoted in the middle exponential growth and early stationary phase (Figure 2, panel 6). In the mutant strain, however, the METC synthesis was almost completely prohibited during the whole period of growth (Figure 2, panel 6). As illustrated in Scheme 1(b), the inhibition of METC synthesis seems to increase significantly the intracellular amount of homoserine that is a key intermediate for the threonine biosynthesis. Since any noticeable amount of lysine was never detected in the culture broth (results not shown), the enhanced level of dihydropicolinate synthetase in the mutant does not seem to contribute towards increasing the level of metabolic intermediates involved in the lysine synthetic pathway.
Conclusions
2-DE was very useful in understanding the quantitative proteomic responses of threonine-overproducing mutant by analysing in detail the time-course variations in the protein level. Comparative analyses of the wild-type and mutant proteomes showed that threonine overproduction accompanied the significant changes in the synthesis level of key metabolic enzymes involved in threonine biosynthesis and degradation pathway. As a result, it is strongly suggested that the altered metabolic conversion leading to the accumulation of oxaloacetate and aspartate and the inhibition of degradation pathways of threonine and precursors played a critical role in producing a large amount of threonine from the mutant. More complete information about the overall regulation characteristics of threonine overproduction would be achieved through a detailed analysis of transcriptomic responses at the gene expression level.
References
- 1.Eggeling L., Morbach S., Sahm H. The fruits of molecular physiology: engineering the L-isoleusine biosynthesis pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Biotechnol. 1997;56:167–182. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Debabov V. G. The threonine story. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2003;79:113–136. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45989-8_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pfefferle W., Mockel B., Bathe B., Marx A. Biotechnological manufacture of lysine. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2003;79:59–112. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45989-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ikeda M., Katsumata R. Transport of aromatic amino acids and its influence on overproduction of the amino acids in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1994;78:420–425. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farfan M. J., Calderon I. L. Enrichment of threonine content in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by pathway engineering. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 2000;26:763–770. doi: 10.1016/s0141-0229(00)00169-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kazuyuki O., Kuniki K., Masato I. Hyperproduction of L-threonine by an Escherichia coli mutant with impaired L-threonine uptake. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997;61:1887–1892. doi: 10.1271/bbb.61.1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ishida M., Sato K., Hashiguchi K. I., Ito H., Enei H., Nakamori S. High fermentative production of L-threonine from acetate by a Brevibacterium flavum stabilized strain transformed with a recombinant plasmid carrying the Escherichia coli the operon. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993;57:1755–1756. doi: 10.1271/bbb.57.1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ishida M., Kawashima H., Sato K., Hashiguchi K. I., Ito H., Enei H., Nakamori S. Factors improving L-threonine production by a three L-threonine biosynthetic genes-amplified recombinant strain of Brevibacterium lactofermentum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994;58:768–770. doi: 10.1271/bbb.58.768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rais B., Chassagnole C., Mazat J. P. Control of threonine pathway in E. coli. Application to biotechnologies. Acta Biotheor. 1995;43:285–297. doi: 10.1007/BF00713554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Reinscheid D. J., Kronemeyer W., Eggeling L., Eikmanns B. J., Sahm H. Stable expression of hom-1-theB in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its effect on the carbon flux to threonine and related amino acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:126–132. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.1.126-132.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shiio I., Sugimoto S. I., Yoshino H., Kawamura K. Isolation and properties of threonine-producing mutants with both dihydrodipicolinate synthase defect and feedback-resistant homoserine dehydrogenase from Brevibacterium flavum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1990;54:1505–1511. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Colon G. E., Jetten M. S., Nguyen T. T., Gubler M. E., Follettie M. T., Sinskey A. J., Stephanopoulos G. Effect of inducible theB expression on amino acid production in Corynebacterium lactofermentum ATCC 21799. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995;61:74–78. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.1.74-78.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Templeton B. A., Savageau M. A. Transport of biosynthetic intermediates: homoserine and threonine uptake in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1974;117:1002–1009. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.3.1002-1009.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hama H., Shimamoto T., Tsuda M., Tsuchiya T. Properties of a Na+-coupled serine–threonine transport system in Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1987;905:231–239. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90451-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chassagnole C., Fell D. A., Rais B., Kudla B., Mazat J. P. Control of the threonine-synthesis pathway in Escherichia coli: a theoretical and experimental approach. Biochem. J. 2001;356:433–444. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3560433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sumantran N. V., Schweizer H. P., Datta P. Novel membrane-associated threonine permease encoded by the tdcC gene of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:4288–4294. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4288-4294.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chassagnole C., Rais B., Quentin E., Fell D. A., Mazat J. P. An integrated study of threonine-pathway enzyme kinetics in Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 2001;356:415–423. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3560415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rais B., Chassagnole C., Letellier T., Fell D. A., Mazat J. P. Threonine synthesis from aspartate in Escherichia coli cell-free extracts: pathway dynamics. Biochem. J. 2001;356:425–432. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3560425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shames S. L., Ash D. E., Wedler F. C., Villafranca J. J. Interaction of aspartate and aspartate-derived antimetabolites with the enzymes of the threonine biosynthetic pathway of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1984;259:15331–15339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alban A., David S. O., Bjorkesten L., Andersson C., Sloge E., Lewis S., Currie I. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics. 2003;3:36–44. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200390006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gorg A., Obermaier C., Boguth G., Harder A., Scheibe B., Wildgruber R., Weiss W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:1037–1053. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1037::AID-ELPS1037>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Williams K. L. Genomes and proteomes: towards a multidimensional view of biology. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:678–688. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:4/5<678::AID-ELPS678>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kirkpatrick C., Maurer L. M., Oyelakin N. E., Yoncheva Y. N., Maurer R., Slonczewski J. L. Acetate and formate stress: opposite responses in the proteome of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:6466–6477. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6466-6477.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Champion K. M., Nishihara J. C., Joly J. C., Arnott D. Similarity of the Escherichia coli proteome upon completion of different biopharmaceutical fermentation processes. Proteomics. 2001;1:1133–1148. doi: 10.1002/1615-9861(200109)1:9<1133::AID-PROT1133>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Han M. J., Yoon S. S., Lee S. Y. Proteomics analysis of metabolically engineered Escherichia coli producing poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:301–308. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.1.301-308.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tonella L., Hoogland C., Binz P. A., Appel R. D., Hochstrasser D. F., Sanchez J. C. New perspectives in the Escherichia coli proteome investigation. Proteomics. 2001;1:409–423. doi: 10.1002/1615-9861(200103)1:3<409::AID-PROT409>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee J. H., Lee D. E., Lee B. U., Kim H. S. Global analyses of transcriptome and proteome of a parent strain and an L-threonine-overproducing mutant strain. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:5442–5451. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.18.5442-5451.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Theze J., Saint-Girons I. The threonine locus of Escherichia coli K-12: genetic structure and evidence for an operon. J. Bacteriol. 1974;42:59–73. doi: 10.1128/jb.118.3.990-998.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rabilloud T. Silver staining of 2-D electrophoresis gels. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999;112:297–305. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-584-7:297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gharahdaghi F., Weinberg C. R., Meagher D. A., Imai B. S., Mische S. M. Mass spectrometric identification of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gel: a method for the removal of silver ions to enhance sensitivity. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:601–605. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990301)20:3<601::AID-ELPS601>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kisumi M., Komatsubara S., Chibata I. Enhancement of isoleucine hydroxamate-mediated growth inhibition and improvement of isoleucine-producing strains of Serratia marcescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977;34:647–653. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.6.647-653.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Farmer R. F., Liao J. C. Improving lycopene production in Escherichia coli by engineering metabolic control. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000;18:533–537. doi: 10.1038/75398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kurland C. G., Dong H. Bacterial growth inhibition by overproduction of protein. Mol. Microbiol. 1996;21:1–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.5901313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Szczesiul M., Wampler D. E. Regulation of a metabolic system in vitro: synthesis of threonine from aspartic acid. Biochemistry. 1976;15:2236–2244. doi: 10.1021/bi00655a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Patte J. C., Truffa-Bachi P., Cohen G. N. The threonine sensitive homoserine dehydrogenase and aspartokinase activities of Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1966;128:426–439. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shiio I., Nakamori S., Sano K. Fermentation production of L-threonine. 1971 U.S. patent 3580810. [Google Scholar]




