Skip to main content
npj Biodiversity logoLink to npj Biodiversity
letter
. 2024 Aug 21;3:19. doi: 10.1038/s44185-024-00051-9

Beyond COP28: Brazil must act to tackle the global climate and biodiversity crisis

Flávia de Figueiredo Machado 1,, Marcela C N S Terra 2, André Ferreira Rodrigues 3, Philip M Fearnside 4, Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto 5, Polyanna da Conceição Bispo 6, Frederico V Faleiro 7, André G Coutinho 8, André Luis Regolin 9, Carolina Jaramillo-Giraldo 10, Fabiano R Melo 11, Felipe P L Melo 12,13, Ima C G Vieira 14, Lara M Monteiro 15,16, Luís G A Barboza 17,18, Madelaine Venzon 10, Raísa R S Vieira 19, Rosângela Corrêa 20, Sheila M Pessoa 21, Fernando M Pelicice 1
PMCID: PMC11339356  PMID: 39242895

Abstract

Extreme weather has made 2023 virtually certain to be the warmest year on record, signaling unprecedented climate and biodiversity crises. Brazil, the world’s most biodiverse country, with two hotspots and complex social and economic layers, has experienced escalating environmental degradation over the past years. Alarming rates of native vegetation loss, wildfires, severe and prolonged droughts, and heatwaves have adversely impacted several Brazilian ecosystems and societies. Despite the country’s decisive role in global carbon neutrality, bridging the gap between Brazil’s discourse on the international stage and its concrete actions at home remains a significant challenge. This correspondence, a collective plea from scientists across various sectors, underscores the urgent imperative for national engagement and commitment to halt and mitigate these crises. We aim to catalyze a robust international public debate, influencing Brazilian decision-makers to chart a concrete sustainable pathway. Aligned with global initiatives, we emphasize the crucial interplay between national and international efforts in combating climate change and the conservation of biodiversity and socio-biodiversity.

Subject terms: Biodiversity, Conservation biology, Ecology, Climate sciences, Scientific community, Social sciences


Extreme weather events have made 2023 virtually certain to be the warmest year on record. Global droughts, floods, and heatwaves confirm that we are facing a climate crisis1, and the Anthropocene’s biodiversity crisis poses unprecedented threats to ecosystems and societies. Despite being the world’s most biodiverse country with two hotspots2, Brazil has experienced escalating environmental degradation over the past years, demanding national engagement and commitment to contain the climate and biodiversity crises. The inauguration of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s third mandate heralded a marked improvement in Brazil’s environmental prospects. While Brazil needs to assume global leadership in confronting the climate and biodiversity crises, a gulf between the country’s discourse on the international stage and its concrete actions at home has impeded this3.

Although Brazil’s GHG emissions decreased by 8% in 2022, totaling 2.3 billion metric tons of CO2, it was the third-highest year in emissions since 2005, keeping Brazil among the top 10 global emitters. Land use and cover change (responsible for 48% of emissions) have declined due to lower deforestation rates in 2023 in the Amazon (50%) and Atlantic (59%) forests4. However, the loss of non-forest vegetation, particularly the Cerrado (central Brazilian savanna), has received less public attention5. The annual loss of Cerrado increased 65.9%4 from 2018 to 2023. In the same period, vegetation coverage declined by 58.4% in the Pantanal, 19.7% in the Brazilian Pampa, and 18.2% in the Caatinga4. In the last 38 years, Brazil has lost 33% of its native vegetation, and non-forest natural vegetation shrank by 9.6 million hectares (a 16% decline). Wildfires are another concern; despite a 1% nationwide decrease in the first half of 2023, wildfires increased in the Amazon by 14% (Fig. 1) and in the Cerrado by 2%. Together, they comprised 98% of Brazil’s burnt area, of which an alarming 84% was in native vegetation. All ecosystems – marine, terrestrial, freshwater, and subterranean—have been negatively affected by human activities in Brazil1. Throughout the country, vegetation loss driven by the expansion of cattle ranching and modern agribusiness has aggravated the impact of extreme floods and droughts caused by El Niño6,7, intensified by climate change. The Amazon has been facing severe droughts and heatwaves, while prolonged droughts in the Cerrado have negatively impacted the water supply to major Brazilian watersheds8. Beyond climate change and habitat loss, other stressors have threatened Brazilian ecosystems1, including pollution, invasive species, overexploitation, epidemics, and emerging diseases.

Fig. 1. Amazon forest on fires.

Fig. 1

(Picture: Philip Fearnside). https://amazoniareal.com.br/queimadas-batem-recorde-em-agosto-na-amazonia/.

At the November 2023 Conference of the Parties for the UN Climate Convention (COP28), Brazil led climate mitigation pledges, promising a 48% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 and 53% by 2030. Beyond COP28’s 1.5 °C target, Brazil is part of the 30 × 30 Biodiversity Framework and the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. However, despite the re-establishment of the Environmental agenda by Brazil’s current Environment Ministry, some of the government entities, such as the Ministry of Transportation and the Ministry of Mines and Energy, promote projects with enormous impacts on biodiversity and climate9. Despite the current President desire to rehabilitate Brazil’s environmental leadership, his administration’s contradictions and an openly anti-environmental right-wing Congress pose risks to Brazilian social-ecological commitments. For example, in December 2023, Brazil joined the OPEP+ group of oil and gas-producing countries and auctioned off 602 drilling blocks spanning nine sedimentary basins (21 in the Amazon), threatening 20 indigenous lands, buffer zones, and 15 protected areas. Simultaneously, the National Congress approved a “time benchmark” (marco temporal) that hinders the demarcation of indigenous territories, affecting biodiversity and the persistence of 266 ethnic groups, violating human rights outlined in Brazil’s 1988 constitution. In Brazil’s National Congress, where the Agribusiness Front has over 60% of the seats in both houses, various bills are advancing towards approval that would have disastrous consequences for sustainability (e.g., PL 364/19, which would leave 48 million hectares unprotected).

Urgent needs to combat the climate and biodiversity crises and improve social justice include restoring degraded ecosystems, implementing more protected areas, encouraging good agricultural practices, and achieving zero loss of native vegetation throughout Brazil. The restoration actions also need to be implemented in drier ecosystems, which hold great carbon sequestration potential5. The current pace of degradation and losses demands policies to safeguard the remaining vegetation in private, public, traditional communities, and indigenous lands10. This is mandatory for Brazil to achieve carbon neutrality and assume global environmental leadership. Brazil’s development needs to be aligned with ongoing initiatives like the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), emphasizing empowering ‘bottom-up’ agendas, reconnecting environmental and social justice, respecting traditional people and communities, and supporting grassroots socio-environmental movements for a state linked to nature. The COP30, which will be held in Brazil, would be an opportune moment to consolidate these actions. Brazilian president’ commitment to ending poverty and addressing social inequalities by integrating climate policies across 23 ministries emphasizes the need for an integrated, articulated, and interdisciplinary approach to deal with both crises, and it demands aligning discourse with practice. Failing this task risks perpetuating the sixth mass extinction, impacting ecosystems and human societies globally.

Author contributions

F.F.M. conceived the idea, led the work, and wrote the first manuscript version. M.C.N.S.T., A.F.R., P.M.F., and L.F.G compiled the data, contributed to the text, and reviewed the paper. P.C.B., F.V.F., A.G.C., A.L.R., C.J.G., F.R.M., F.P.L.M., I.C.G.V., L.M.M., L.G.A.B., M.V., R.R.S.V, R.C., S.M.P., F.M.P. contributed with the text and reviewed the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

11/28/2024

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s44185-024-00069-z

References


Articles from npj Biodiversity are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES