Skip to main content
European Heart Journal Open logoLink to European Heart Journal Open
editorial
. 2024 Aug 6;4(4):oeae063. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae063

Colchicine improves clinical outcomes in patients with coronary disease, will it result in similar benefits in peripheral artery disease?

Jean-Claude Tardif 1,1,, Sabine Cuthill 2,3
Editor: Denis Wahl
PMCID: PMC11339708  PMID: 39175847

This editorial refers to ‘Colchicine for cardiovascular and limb risk reduction in Medicare beneficiaries with peripheral artery disease: emulation of target trials’, by P. Heindel et al.,  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae062.

Inflammation is central to the initiation, progression, and destabilization of atherosclerosis. The anti-inflammatory agent colchicine has been shown to reduce the risk of vascular events both in patients with a recent myocardial infarction and in those with chronic coronary artery disease.1,2 This has led to the introduction of low-dose colchicine in European and American prevention guidelines.3,4 Furthermore, the use of colchicine has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death in adult patients with established atherosclerotic disease. Whether colchicine will yield similar benefits in patients with peripheral vascular disease is presently not known.

In this issue of the European Heart Journal Open, Heindel et al. attempt to evaluate the effects of colchicine in patients with peripheral artery disease.5 Because no randomized placebo-controlled trial addressing this question has been completed, the authors simulated two clinical studies of patients with peripheral artery disease and gout treated with a urate-lowering medication (predominantly allopurinol). The first simulated study compared the initiation of treatment with colchicine or with a variety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The second simulated study compared ‘long-term’ and short-term (3 months) treatment with colchicine. Patients were eligible if they were continuously enrolled in Medicare and receiving care at an American academic center between 2007 and 2019. These simulated studies failed to demonstrate significant differences between treatment arms in clinical endpoints pertaining to cardiovascular and limb events.

Although Heindel et al. used the best possible approach in their analysis, these ‘emulated trials’ suffer from major limitations. First, these two non-randomized studies were underpowered and included a total of 1820 patients, in contrast to the COLCOT and LoDoCo2 randomized trials that included collectively more than 10 000 patients. Second, the mean therapy duration was exceedingly short at 247 days for colchicine and 137 days for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Such brief treatment periods do not allow for any credible conclusion on the effects on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic atherosclerotic disease. Third, the use of concomitant medications was lower than expected, with statins and prescription anti-platelet agents used in 77% and 14% of patients, respectively. Fourth, non-randomized studies cannot necessarily account for all potential confounders and ensure that all baseline characteristics are similar among treatment groups. Multiple factors likely were taken into consideration before initiating colchicine or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in these patients who were not randomly assigned to treatment. In the analysis of the subset of 989 patients with coronary artery disease, the emulated trials could not replicate the benefits on cardiovascular outcomes observed in the COLCOT and LoDoCo2 randomized trials. This appears to put in question the other results of the simulated studies reported here by Heindel et al.

The COLCOT and LoDoCo2 randomized trials have shown that low-dose colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease. Ongoing randomized clinical trials like LEADER-PAD (NCT04774159) and COLCOT-T2D (NCT05633810) will inform us on the effects of colchicine in other types of patients like those living with peripheral artery disease and Type 2 diabetes.

Contributor Information

Jean-Claude Tardif, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street, Montreal, PQ, Canada H1T 1C8.

Sabine Cuthill, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street, Montreal, PQ, Canada H1T 1C8.

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  • 1. Tardif  JC, Kouz  S, Waters  DD, Bertrand  OF, Diaz  R, Maggioni  AP, Pinto  FJ, Ibrahim  R, Gamra  H, Kiwan  GS, Berry  C, López-Sendón  J, Ostadal  P, Koenig  W, Angoulvant  D, Grégoire  JC, Lavoie  MA, Dubé  MP, Rhainds  D, Provencher  M, Blondeau  L, Orfanos  A, L'Allier  PL, Guertin  MC, Roubille  F. Efficacy and safety of low-dose colchicine after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med  2019;381:2497–2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Nidorf  SM, Fiolet  ATL, Mosterd  A, Eikelboom  JW, Schut  A, Opstal  TSJ, The  SHK, Xu  XF, Ireland  MA, Lenderink  T, Latchem  D, Hoogslag  P, Jerzewski  A, Nierop  P, Whelan  A, Hendriks  R, Swart  H, Schaap  J, Kuijper  AFM, van Hessen  MWJ, Saklani  P, Tan  I, Thompson  AG, Morton  A, Judkins  C, Bax  WA, Dirksen  M, Alings  M, Hankey  GJ, Budgeon  CA, Tijssen  JGP, Cornel  JH, Thompson  PL; LoDoCo2 Trial Investigators . Colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease. N Engl J Med  2020;383:1838–1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Visseren  FLJ, Mach  F, Smulders  YM, Carballo  D, Koskinas  KC, Bäck  M, Benetos  A, Biffi  A, Boavida  JM, Capodanno  D, Cosyns  B, Crawford  C, Davos  CH, Desormais  I, Di Angelantonio  E, Franco  OH, Halvorsen  S, Hobbs  FDR, Hollander  M, Jankowska  EA, Michal  M, Sacco  S, Sattar  N, Tokgozoglu  L, Tonstad  S, Tsioufis  KP, van Dis  I, van Gelder  IC, Wanner  C, Williams  B; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J  2021;42:3227–3337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Virani  SS, Newby  LK, Arnold  SV, Bittner  V, Brewer  LC, Demeter  SH, Dixon  DL, Fearon  WF, Hess  B, Johnson  HM, Kazi  DS, Kolte  D, Kumbhani  DJ, LoFaso  J, Mahtta  D, Mark  DB, Minissian  M, Navar  AM, Patel  AR, Piano  MR, Rodriguez  F, Talbot  AW, Taqueti  VR, Thomas  RJ, van Diepen  S, Wiggins  B, Williams  MS; Writing Committee Members . 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol  2023;82:833–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Heindel  P, Fitzgibbon  JJ, Secemsky  E, Bhatt  DL, Al-Omran  M, Verma  S, Almaghlouth  IA, Madenci  A, Hussain  MA. Colchicine for cardiovascular and limb risk reduction in Medicare beneficiaries with peripheral artery disease: emulation of target trials. Eur Heart J Open  2024. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from European Heart Journal Open are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES