Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Chemical Science logoLink to Chemical Science
. 2024 Aug 13;15(36):14844–14850. doi: 10.1039/d4sc02962c

Visible light-induced halogen-atom transfer by N-heterocyclic carbene-ligated boryl radicals for diastereoselective C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond formation†

Luca Capaldo a,b,‡,✉, Ting Wan a,c,‡, Robin Mulder a, Jonas Djossou a, Timothy Noël a,✉
PMCID: PMC11340342  PMID: 39184300

Abstract

Photoinduced halogen-atom transfer (XAT) has rapidly emerged as a programmable approach to generate carbon-centered radical intermediates, mainly relying on silyl and α-aminoalkyl radicals as halogen abstractors. More recently, ligated boryl radicals have also been proposed as effective halogen abstractors under visible-light irradiation. In this study, we describe the use of this approach to enable C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond formation via radical addition of carbon-centered radicals generated via XAT onto chloroalkynes. Our mechanistic investigation reveals a complex interplay of highly reactive radical intermediates which, under optimized conditions, delivered the targeted vinyl chlorides in excellent yields and Z : E ratios. Finally, we demonstrated the synthetic value of these products in transition metal-based cross-coupling reactions.

In this work, we report the synthesis of vinyl chlorides from chloroalkynes via ligated boryl radicals-mediated XAT under visible light. This study introduces the first protocol using XAT to establish a C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond through radical addition.graphic file with name d4sc02962c-ga.jpg

Introduction

Over the past decade, the field of chemistry has experienced a notable expansion in synthetic methodologies, marked by the development of increasingly selective techniques focused on the use of carbon-centered radicals.1 This advancement is attributed to the accumulation of knowledge over the past century regarding these fleeting intermediates,2 coupled with the emergence of gentler approaches for their generation, such as electro-3 and photo-catalysis.4 As a specific example, light-mediated halogen-atom transfer (XAT) has emerged as a versatile and controllable method for generating radical intermediates from readily available haloalkanes, predominantly relying on silyl and α-aminoalkyl radicals as halogen abstractors.5 In these processes, the excited state of a photocatalyst oxidizes silicon-containing compounds (e.g., supersilane and supersilanol)6–8 and amines9,10 to unveil the halogen abstractor.

More recently, N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-ligated boryl radicals (LBRs) have also been proposed as halogen abstractors under visible-light irradiation.11–13 While the mild nucleophilicity of these boron-centered radicals14 has traditionally been exploited for B–C bond formation,15–19 their affinity for halogens can also be utilized for the homolytic activation of a C–X bond, generating carbon-centered radicals via XAT (Fig. 1A).20–24 We have recently exploited this capability, triggering the reactivity under visible-light irradiation in the presence of an organic photocatalyst to realize C(sp3)–C(sp3) bond formation through a classical Giese-type reaction mechanism (Fig. 1B).12,25 In this process, the excited state of the photocatalyst is reductively quenched by an NHC-ligated borane,26 leading to the spontaneous deprotonation and generation of the corresponding LBR.

Fig. 1. (A) Use of NHC-ligated boryl radicals (LBRs) in light-mediated synthesis. (B) C(sp3)–C(sp3) bond formation via LBR-mediated XAT. (C) This work: C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond formation via LBR-mediated XAT.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

This species is then responsible for the XAT with a variety of alkyl iodides, producing carbon-centered radicals that subsequently participate in a radical addition step with electron-poor olefins. We wondered whether an LBR-based approach could be viable for C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond formation. Drawing upon the findings from our initial report, we surmised that an effective approach to tackle this challenge would entail exploring a radical addition pathway onto carbon–carbon triple bonds. Unlike acetylenic bromides and sulfones,27 which typically yield alkynylation products via a radical addition/β-fragmentation pathway, their chlorinated analogues retain the halogen atom in the final product, as demonstrated by Hashmi in a seminal work based on HAT.28 Consequently, the resulting vinyl chlorides, which are valuable intermediates for transition metal-based cross-coupling reactions,29–31 contain the coveted C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond. This reactivity difference arises from the higher carbon–halogen bond dissociation energy (BDE) for a C–Cl bond, which inhibits the β-fragmentation step.28,32 Since this chlorine radical elimination is hindered, we hypothesized that the vinyl radical, deriving from the radical addition of the alkyl radical generated via XAT onto the triple bond, could abstract a hydrogen atom from another molecule of NHC-ligated borane, thus initiating a LBR-sustained radical chain mechanism. Given the mild nucleophilicity of LBRs, competitive direct addition onto chloroalkynes should be unfavorable. Herein, we present the realization of this synthetic protocol (Fig. 1C).

Results and discussion

We started our investigations by optimizing the reaction between iodocyclohexane 1a (2 equiv.) and chloroalkyne 2a (0.1 mmol) in the presence of ligated borane B1 (1.2 equiv.). When 4CzIPN (5 mol%) served as the photocatalyst (PC), product 3 was obtained in 26% 1H NMR yield (Table 1, entry 1) after 12 hours of blue LED irradiation. Employing a more oxidizing acridinium catalyst (Mes-AcrClO4, E(PC*/PCred) = +2.06 V vs. SCE)33 resulted in similar yields (30%, entry 2), while photocatalysts such as Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (E(PC*/PCred) = +0.77 V vs. SCE)34 and Eosin Y (E(PC*/PCred) = +0.83 V vs. SCE)35 afforded lower NMR yields (entries 3 and 4). This trend can be explained based on the oxidation potential of B1 (Ep/2 = +0.89 V vs. SCE):36 reductive quenching becomes inefficient with the latter two photocatalysts. The addition of water and a slight increase in the stoichiometry of B1 (1.5 equiv.) proved beneficial for the transformation (entries 5 and 6), allowing to obtain product 3 in 68% yield. We found that the addition of K3PO4 boosted reactivity (6 h vs. 12 h), presumably by facilitating deprotonation subsequent to the oxidation of B1 by PC* to reveal the desired LBR (entry 7). Notably, the product could be obtained with a very good 1H NMR yield (∼80%) even with a reduced loading of 4CzIPN (0.5 mol%, entry 8). Under these conditions, an excellent Z : E ratio of 92 : 8 was measured (see ESI for additional info†). Control experiments (entries 9 and 10) showed that light, 4CzIPN and B1 are all necessary for initiating the desired reactivity. Moreover, when we tried to execute the same transformation with silyl radicals or α-aminoalkyl radicals, we could not obtain product 3 in satisfactory yields (Section 9 in the ESI†).

Optimization of reaction conditions.

graphic file with name d4sc02962c-u1.jpg
Entry Variation from conditions Yielda (%)
1 None 26
2 Mes-AcrClO4 instead of 4CzIPN 30
3 Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 instead of 4CzIPN 10
4 Eosin Y instead of 4CzIPN 14
5 As entry 1, MeCN/H2O 9 : 1 instead of MeCN 56
6 As entry 5, 1a : 2a : B1 2 : 1 : 1.5 68
7 As entry 6, 4CzIPN (2 mol%), K3PO4 (0.5 equiv.), 6 h 80
8 As entry 7, 4CzIPN (0.5 mol%), 6 h 82 (Z : E 92 : 8) b ; 73 c
9 As entry 8, no PC, no B1 or no light n.d.
10 As entry 8, Δ (80 °C, dark) n.d.
Open in a new tab
a

Yields were determined via1H-NMR by using CH2Br2 as external standard.

b

The Z : E-ratio was determined via1H-NMR of the reaction crude.

c

Yield of the isolated product.

With the optimized conditions in hand (Table 1, entry 8), we proceeded to explore the scope of the transformation (Fig. 2). First, various secondary halides were subjected to the reaction conditions, revealing that both cyclic and acyclic iodoalkanes delivered the anticipated products in good to excellent yields and diastereomeric ratios (3–13, 47–95%). Both acetal and CF2 moieties were successfully tolerated under the reaction conditions, yielding the desired products (7–8, 73–81%). Saturated N- and S-containing heterocycles were also well accommodated, encompassing pharmaceutically relevant azetidine and piperidine derivatives (9–13, 47–81%). Subsequently, we explored the option of employing primary iodides under our reaction conditions. This necessitated slight modifications to the reaction conditions, as we found in our previous report,12 including a different organic halide/chloroalkyne ratio (1 : 2 1 : 1.5) and prolonged light exposure (18 h vs. 6 h). With these conditions, complete conversion of the halide was observed, affording compounds 14–18 in satisfactory yields (45–65%). Intriguingly, our approach proved chemoselective towards C–I bonds (see compound 17) leaving C–Br unaffected. This shows complementary reactivity compared to the more common XAT manifolds based on silyl and α-aminoalkyl radicals. Also methylation could be realized using our methodology (18). A caffeine derivative could be functionalized as well, albeit in modest yield (19, 39%). One tertiary iodide also proved to be an effective coupling partner, yielding the desired compound in a synthetically useful yield and modest diastereoselectivity (20, 31%, Z : E 75 : 25). However, alkyl bromides continued to present a limitation for this XAT methodology, consistent with observations in our previous work.12

Fig. 2. Scope of the transformation. Reported yields of compounds reflect values obtained after purification via column chromatography; displayed Z : E ratios were determined via1H-NMR of the reaction crude. Major isomers (Z) are shown. For secondary organic halides (GP3 in the ESI†): 2 (0.5 mmol), 1 (2 equiv.), B1 (1.5 equiv.), K3PO4 (0.5 equiv.) in CH3CN/H2O 9 : 1 (5 mL) in the presence of 4CzIPN (0.5 mol%), 6 h. For primary organic halides (GP4 in the ESI†): 2 (1.5 equiv.), 1 (0.5 mmol), B1 (1.5 equiv.), K3PO4 (0.5 equiv.) in CH3CN/H2O 9 : 1 (5 mL) in the presence of 4CzIPN (0.5 mol%), 18 h. Solutions were bubbled with N2 (5 min) prior to irradiation (40 W Kessil lamp, λ = 456 nm). a1 was used in 1.5 equiv. bReaction time: 8 h. cReaction time: 16 h. d10 equivalents of methyl iodide were used. e0.5 mmol of 1 and 2 equiv., of 2 were used. f0.5 mmol of 1 and 1.2 equiv., of 2 were used. g34% of the corresponding alkyne (32′) was isolated as well. hReaction carried out on 0.1 mmol scale.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Regarding the scope of the chloroalkynes counterpart, we observed that the reaction remained efficient across a wide array of functional groups. Notably, strongly electron-withdrawing groups on the aromatic ring facilitated the formation of the desired products in good yields (21–22, 54–76%). Similarly, halogen substituents on the aromatic ring were well accommodated under our conditions (23–28, 62–85%), without any interference observed during the XAT step. Chloroalkynes bearing mildly electron-donating substituents on the aromatic ring afforded products 29–31 in excellent yields (78–83%). Interestingly, the presence of a strong electron-donating methoxy substituent partially redirected reactivity, resulting in the desired product 32 with a 55% isolated yield, along with the formation of 34% of the corresponding alkyne (32′), wherein the chlorine atom underwent formal replacement by the alkyl radical. It is noteworthy that the formation of alkynes was not observed under other conditions, and to the best of our knowledge, this reactivity is much more commonly observed for brominated analogues featuring weak C–Br bonds (see Section 8 in the ESI†).27 Finally, heterocycles (such as pyridine and thiophene) and conjugated carbon–carbon double bonds were well tolerated, yielding the corresponding products 33–35 in yields ranging from 31% to 53%. Similarly, when using a chlorodiyne as radical trap, the expected product 36 was formed, albeit in lower yield. On the contrary, fully aliphatic chloroalkynes remain a limitation of the scope, in accordance with the literature.28 More in detail, 1-chlorooctyne did not deliver the expected product and resulted in decomposition.

We then shifted our attention towards elucidating the mechanism to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the reaction. Our initial hypothesis (Fig. 3A) proposed that reductive quenching of the photocatalyst excited state would lead, upon base-aided deprotonation, to the crucial ligated boryl radical (I˙). This species would subsequently engage with organohalides via XAT to generate a carbon-centered radical (II˙), which would then be readily intercepted by the chloroalkyne (2). The regioselectivity of this step is known to be influenced by both thermodynamic and kinetic factors.28 The resulting vinyl radical (III˙) is expected to exhibit high reactivity and would abstract a hydrogen atom from a molecule of B1, yielding the anticipated vinyl chloride and regenerating the LBR, thereby initiating a radical chain mechanism.

Fig. 3. (A) Proposed mechanism. (B) Deuterium labelling experiments. (C) DFT analysis of the reaction pathway. (D) Late-stage diversification campaign for vinyl chlorides. aYields were determined via1H-NMR by using CH2Br2 as external standard. bThe Z : E-ratio was determined via1H-NMR of the reaction crude.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

To further investigate the occurrence of a radical chain mechanism, we conducted deuteration experiments (Fig. 3B). When the model reaction was performed in the presence of B1-d3 instead of B1, complete incorporation of deuterium was observed, strongly suggesting the operation of a radical chain mechanism. In contrast, when deuterated solvent was used (CD3CN/D2O 9 : 1), no deuterium atom was incorporated into the product. Additionally, we measured the Kinetic Isotope Effect (KIE) of the reaction using the parallel reaction method37 and found a value of 1.2 (see Section 9 in the ESI†), which suggests that the halogen atom transfer might be limiting the rate of the reaction.

To get further insights, we conducted a computational investigation aimed at modelling the entire reaction profile between substrates 1h and 2a, simulating all key steps including XAT, radical addition, and HAT. We adopted Density Functional Theory (DFT) at the (U)ωB97xD/def2TZVP level of theory to optimize the relevant stationary points, also including the effect of the solvent (CH3CN) using an implicit model (Fig. 3C). Initially, we considered the reaction between the LBR (I˙) and 1aviaTS1 (ΔG‡ = +9.8 kcal mol−1) to afford alkyl radical II˙, which is then trapped by chloroalkyne 2aviaTS2 (ΔG‡ = +15.9 kcal mol−1). Vinyl radicals are known to adopt either a linear or a bent geometry, depending on the substituent attached to the carbon bearing the unpaired electron. Our DFT analysis confirmed that when this substituent is a π-type group (e.g., a phenyl ring), the vinyl radical adopts a linear geometry, thus suggesting that stereochemical control does not occur in the radical addition step to yield III˙.38–40 Moreover, it has been reported39 that the barrier for inversion of bent vinyl radicals is typically low, further diminishing the likelihood of the radical addition step being the key determinant of the observed stereoselectivity. From III˙, the targeted vinyl chloride 10 is formed through reaction with NHC-ligated borane B1viaTS3Z (ΔG‡ = +14.6 kcal mol−1) or TS3E (ΔG‡ = +16.1 kcal mol−1). We propose that Z-diasteroselectivity originates in this step, despite the marginal thermodynamic (ΔΔGE–Z = 1.5 kcal mol−1) and kinetic (ΔΔG‡ = +1.5 kcal mol−1) driving forces. It is crucial to note that due to the conjugated structure of the prepared vinyl chlorides, triplet–triplet sensitization might be an underlying process. While we did observe photoisomerization, it is noteworthy that this process was identified to be comparatively slower than the formation of the vinyl chloride itself. Consequently, one can halt the reaction before photoisomerization occurs (see Section 9 in the ESI†).41,42 A quantum yield for vinyl chloride formation was determined to be 10% via ferrioxalate actinometry. Such a modest value is consistent with a process being supported by either short-lived radical chain propagations or an inefficient initiation process.43

Finally, we demonstrated the synthetic value of the synthesized vinyl chlorides (Fig. 3D). The chlorine atom in Z-12 could be readily substituted with cyanide under Pd-catalysis to afford product 37 in 50% yield. Similarly, the same substrate exhibited compatibility for a nickel-mediated Kumada–Corriu-type coupling (38, 44%) and was also effective in the Pd-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling (39, 91%).

Conclusions

In summary, this work elucidates the effective utilization of NHC-ligated boryl radicals for promoting the formation of C(sp3)–C(sp2) bonds under visible light irradiation through XAT. The boron-centered radicals served as halogen abstractors for a diverse array of organoiodides, generating carbon-centered radicals that readily underwent radical addition with chloroalkynes, resulting in the formation of synthetically valuable vinyl chlorides. Despite being previously reported by Hashmi via HAT,28 the current methodology offers several advantages, including reduced excess of the alkyl coupling partner, broader substrate scope, minimal photocatalyst loading, and improved diastereoselectivity. While the reduced nucleophilicity of the ligated boryl radical limits the activation of alkyl bromides, it concurrently enhances selectivity by discouraging direct addition to the triple bond. This study represents the first protocol employing XAT for establishing a C(sp3)–C(sp2) bond through a radical addition mechanism and demonstrates the synthetic value of ligated boryl radicals.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.†

Author contributions

L. C.: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing, project administration. T. W. & R. M.: investigation, data curation, writing – review & editing. T. N.: supervision, writing – review & editing.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

SC-015-D4SC02962C-s001

Acknowledgments

L. C. acknowledges the framework of the COMP-R Initiatives, funded by the ‘Departments of Excellence’ programs of the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MUR, 2023–2027). We acknowledge the CINECA award under the ISCRA initiative, for the availability of high-performance computing resources and support. T.W. has received support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for her PhD studies. We also received support from the European Union H2020 under the ERC Consolidator Grant (FlowHAT, No. 101044355, T. N.) and MSCA ITN (GreenDigiPharma, No. 101073089, J. D. and T. N.).

†

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Procedures, characterization of compounds, spectroscopic data, computational data. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc02962c

References

  1. Zard S. Z. Radicals in Action: A Festival of Radical Transformations. Org. Lett. 2017;19:1257–1269. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Studer A. Curran D. P. Catalysis of Radical Reactions: A Radical Chemistry Perspective. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:58–102. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Novaes L. F. T. Liu J. Shen Y. Lu L. Meinhardt J. M. Lin S. Electrocatalysis as an enabling technology for organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:7941–8002. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00223F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crespi S. Fagnoni M. Generation of Alkyl Radicals: From the Tyranny of Tin to the Photon Democracy. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:9790–9833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Julia F. Constantin T. Leonori D. Applications of Halogen-Atom Transfer (XAT) for the Generation of Carbon Radicals in Synthetic Photochemistry and Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2022;122:2292–2352. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang P. Le C. C. MacMillan D. W. Silyl Radical Activation of Alkyl Halides in Metallaphotoredox Catalysis: A Unique Pathway for Cross-Electrophile Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:8084–8087. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Le C. Chen T. Q. Liang T. Zhang P. MacMillan D. W. C. A radical approach to the copper oxidative addition problem: Trifluoromethylation of bromoarenes. Science. 2018;360:1010–1014. doi: 10.1126/science.aat4133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ElMarrouni A. Ritts C. B. Balsells J. Silyl-mediated photoredox-catalyzed Giese reaction: addition of non-activated alkyl bromides. Chem. Sci. 2018;9:6639–6646. doi: 10.1039/C8SC02253D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kostromitin V. S. Sorokin A. O. Levin V. V. Dilman A. D. Aminals as powerful XAT-reagents: activation of fluorinated alkyl chlorides. Chem. Sci. 2023;14:3229–3234. doi: 10.1039/D3SC00027C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Constantin T. Zanini M. Regni A. Sheikh N. S. Julia F. Leonori D. Aminoalkyl radicals as halogen-atom transfer agents for activation of alkyl and aryl halides. Science. 2020;367:1021–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.aba2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Supranovich V. I. Levin V. V. Struchkova M. I. Korlyukov A. A. Dilman A. D. Radical Silyldifluoromethylation of Electron-Deficient Alkenes. Org. Lett. 2017;19:3215–3218. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wan T. Capaldo L. Ravelli D. Vitullo W. de Zwart F. J. de Bruin B. Noël T. Photoinduced Halogen-Atom Transfer by N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Ligated Boryl Radicals for C(sp3)–C(sp3) Bond Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:991–999. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c10444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wan T. Ciszewski L. W. Ravelli D. Capaldo L. Photoinduced Intermolecular Radical Hydroalkylation of Olefins via Ligated Boryl Radicals-Mediated Halogen Atom Transfer. Org. Lett. 2024;26:5839–5843. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c02034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Capaldo L. Noël T. Ravelli D. Photocatalytic generation of ligated boryl radicals from tertiary amine-borane complexes: An emerging tool in organic synthesis. Chem Catal. 2022;2:957–966. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Taniguchi T. Advances in chemistry of N-heterocyclic carbene boryl radicals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:8995–9021. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00385B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peng T. Y. Zhang F. L. Wang Y. F. Lewis Base-Boryl Radicals Enabled Borylation Reactions and Selective Activation of Carbon-Heteroatom Bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023;56:169–186. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ren S. C. Zhang F. L. Qi J. Huang Y. S. Xu A. Q. Yan H. Y. Wang Y. F. Radical Borylation/Cyclization Cascade of 1,6-Enynes for the Synthesis of Boron-Handled Hetero- and Carbocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:6050–6053. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Qi J. Zhang F. L. Jin J. K. Zhao Q. Li B. Liu L. X. Wang Y. F. New Radical Borylation Pathways for Organoboron Synthesis Enabled by Photoredox Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:12876–12884. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao Q. Li B. Zhou X. Wang Z. Zhang F. L. Li Y. Zhou X. Fu Y. Wang Y. F. Boryl Radicals Enabled a Three-Step Sequence to Assemble All-Carbon Quaternary Centers from Activated Trichloromethyl Groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:15275–15285. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ueng S. H. Fensterbank L. Lacote E. Malacria M. Curran D. P. Radical reductions of alkyl halides bearing electron withdrawing groups with N-heterocyclic carbene boranes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:3415–3420. doi: 10.1039/C0OB01075H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pan X. Lacote E. Lalevee J. Curran D. P. Polarity reversal catalysis in radical reductions of halides by N-heterocyclic carbene boranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:5669–5674. doi: 10.1021/ja300416f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ueng S. H. Solovyev A. Yuan X. Geib S. J. Fensterbank L. Lacote E. Malacria M. Newcomb M. Walton J. C. Curran D. P. N-heterocyclic carbene boryl radicals: a new class of boron-centered radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:11256–11262. doi: 10.1021/ja904103x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ueng S. H. Brahmi M. M. Derat E. Fensterbank L. Lacote E. Malacria M. Curran D. P. Complexes of borane and N-heterocyclic carbenes: a new class of radical hydrogen atom donor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:10082–10083. doi: 10.1021/ja804150k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Curran D. P. Solovyev A. Makhlouf Brahmi M. Fensterbank L. Malacria M. Lacote E. Synthesis and reactions of N-heterocyclic carbene boranes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011;50:10294–10317. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Giese B. Formation of CC Bonds by Addition of Free Radicals to Alkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003;22:753–764. doi: 10.1002/anie.198307531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Capaldo L., Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, 2024, pp. 1–8, 10.1002/047084289X.rn02566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ge D. Wang X. Chu X.-Q. SOMOphilic alkynylation using acetylenic sulfones as functional reagents. Org. Chem. Front. 2021;8:5145–5164. doi: 10.1039/D1QO00798J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Adak T. Hoffmann M. Witzel S. Rudolph M. Dreuw A. Hashmi A. S. K. Visible Light-Enabled sp3-C–H Functionalization with Chloro- and Bromoalkynes: Chemoselective Route to Vinylchlorides or Alkynes. Chem.–Eur. J. 2020;26:15573–15580. doi: 10.1002/chem.202001259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang L. Modular Synthesis of α-Substituted Alkenyl Acetals by a Palladium-Catalyzed Suzuki Reaction of α-Haloalkenyl Acetals with Organoboranes. Synlett. 2020;32:723–727. doi: 10.1055/a-1322-3916. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tan Z. Negishi E. Widely applicable Pd-catalyzed trans-selective monoalkylation of unactivated 1,1-dichloro-1-alkenes and Pd-catalyzed second substitution for the selective synthesis of E or Z trisubstituted alkenes. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006;45:762–765. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Huo L. Li X. Zhao Y. Li L. Chu L. Site- and Stereoselective Synthesis of Alkenyl Chlorides by Dual Functionalization of Internal Alkynes via Photoredox/Nickel Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:9876–9885. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c02748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Capaldo L. Ravelli D. Decatungstate as Direct Hydrogen Atom Transfer Photocatalyst for SOMOphilic Alkynylation. Org. Lett. 2021;23:2243–2247. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c00381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. MacKenzie I. A. Wang L. Onuska N. P. R. Williams O. F. Begam K. Moran A. M. Dunietz B. D. Nicewicz D. A. Discovery and characterization of an acridine radical photoreductant. Nature. 2020;580:76–80. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2131-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Creutz C. Sutin N. Electron-transfer reactions of excited states. Reductive quenching of the tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) luminescence. Inorg. Chem. 2002;15:496–499. doi: 10.1021/ic50156a062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lazarides T. McCormick T. Du P. Luo G. Lindley B. Eisenberg R. Making hydrogen from water using a homogeneous system without noble metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:9192–9194. doi: 10.1021/ja903044n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lei G. Xu M. Chang R. Funes-Ardoiz I. Ye J. Hydroalkylation of Unactivated Olefins via Visible-Light-Driven Dual Hydrogen Atom Transfer Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:11251–11261. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c05852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Simmons E. M. Hartwig J. F. On the interpretation of deuterium kinetic isotope effects in C-H bond functionalizations by transition-metal complexes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:3066–3072. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rubin H. Fischer H. The Addition of tert-Butyl (Me3Ċ) and (tert-Butoxy)carbonylmethyl (Me3CO2CĊH2) radicals to alkynes in solution studied by ESR spectroscopy. Helv. Chim. Acta. 2004;79:1670–1682. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19960790617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Galli C. Guarnieri A. Koch H. Mencarelli P. Rappoport Z. Effect of Substituents on the Structure of the Vinyl Radical: Calculations and Experiments. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:4072–4077. doi: 10.1021/jo962373h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Bonazzola L. Fenistein S. Marx R. Electronic structure of α-substituted vinyl radicals. Mol. Phys. 2006;22:689–695. doi: 10.1080/00268977100102951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei X. J. Boon W. Hessel V. Noel T. Visible-Light Photocatalytic Decarboxylation of alpha,beta-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids: Facile Access to Stereoselective Difluoromethylated Styrenes in Batch and Flow. ACS Catal. 2017;7:7136–7140. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Straathof N. J. Cramer S. E. Hessel V. Noel T. Practical Photocatalytic Trifluoromethylation and Hydrotrifluoromethylation of Styrenes in Batch and Flow. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:15549–15553. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pitre S. P. McTiernan C. D. Vine W. DiPucchio R. Grenier M. Scaiano J. C. Visible-Light Actinometry and Intermittent Illumination as Convenient Tools to Study Ru(bpy)3Cl2 Mediated Photoredox Transformations. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16397. doi: 10.1038/srep16397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SC-015-D4SC02962C-s001
SC-015-D4SC02962C-s001.pdf (8.5MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.†

Articles from Chemical Science are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES