Abstract
The nasopharyngeal tube (NT) is an effective interface for noninvasive ventilation (NIV). In cases of severe heart failure, assistance with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) effectively reduces afterload and alleviates respiratory effort. We present the case of a three-day-old male neonate diagnosed with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). In respiratory management, extubation was delayed due to increased respiratory effort and afterload, so this patient was extubated and managed with NPPV using an NT. An uncuffed endotracheal tube was inserted, initiating NIV with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 8 cmH2O. The patient exhibited stable vital signs post-extubation and was weaned off NPPV and transferred to the general ward. In this case of severe AS, the use of NT as an interface for NPPV demonstrated efficacy in respiratory and circulatory management. This approach could have shortened the duration of mechanical ventilation and facilitated safe postoperative care, highlighting the potential benefits of NT in managing severe heart failure.
Keywords: respiratory and circulatory support, afterload, aortic valve stenosis, noninvasive ventilation, nasopharyngeal tube
Introduction
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an effective respiratory support for pediatric respiratory diseases, such as bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, associated with immune disorders [1-3]. It has shown effectiveness in the postoperative management of congenital heart disease as cardiopulmonary management, and its use has recently become widespread [4].
The nasopharyngeal tube (NT) is an effective interface for NIV [5]. In cases of severe heart failure, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) effectively reduces the cardiac afterload and alleviates the respiratory effort; however, studies reporting the management of neonatal cases of aortic stenosis (AS) using NPPV with NT as the interface are limited. We report a neonatal case of severe AS, which demonstrated the efficacy of NPPV used with NT for respiratory and circulatory support.
Case presentation
Medical history
The patient was a three-day-old male infant who was born at full term after an uncomplicated pregnancy, with a birth weight of 3,335 g. The prenatal diagnosis was not performed. He had respiratory distress and cyanosis. His blood pressure was unknown, and other vital signs were heart rate of 180 beats/minute, temperature of 35.8°C, respiratory rate of 80 breaths/minute, and SpO2 of 90% on room air. A heart murmur was immediately detected, and cardiac ultrasound findings led to a diagnosis of severe AS. Initially, the pressure gradient between the left ventricle and aorta was ≥80 mmHg. The patient was deemed suitable for cardiac catheterization therapy and was transferred to our hospital.
Cardiac catheterization treatment
On cardiac catheterization, the left ventricular pressure was 180 mmHg, and the aortic pressure was 50 mmHg. The resulting pressure gradient was approximately 130 mmHg. Balloon dilation was performed twice, reducing the pressure gradient to approximately 50 mmHg under general anesthesia The first dilation was performed using a balloon dilatation catheter with a 5-mm diameter, corresponding to 90% of the valve’s annular diameter, and the second dilation was performed using a balloon dilatation catheter with a 6-mm diameter, corresponding to 100% of the annular diameter. After the procedures, the patient was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) under mechanical ventilation and administered adrenaline and dobutamine.
Pediatric intensive care unit management
The initial vital signs upon admission were blood pressure of 50/30 mmHg in the upper limbs, heart rate of 182 beats/minute, temperature of 36.0°C, and SpO2 of 98% on oxygen supplementation at an FIO2 of 0.30. After admission, deep sedation and muscle relaxation management were performed. The latter was continued until postoperative day two. Postoperative myocardial contractility was negative on echocardiography. Adrenaline tapering began on postoperative day one and was discontinued on postoperative day two. Noradrenaline was administered to maintain the diastolic blood pressure and was discontinued on postoperative day three. Dobutamine tapering began on postoperative day five and was discontinued on postoperative day eight. Respiratory management was performed using the synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation mode with a peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 22-24 cmH2O and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O for assistance. From postoperative day four, respiratory management primarily focused on spontaneous breathing and ventilator assistance was reduced to PIP of 18 cmH2O on postoperative day nine. Subsequently, daily spontaneous breathing trials were implemented; however, the heart rate and respiratory rate increased, and the respiratory effort intensified, leading to the decision to delay extubation. An increased afterload caused by reduced ventilator assistance was suspected of being one of the possible causes of this complication.
Nasopharyngeal tube utilization
Given the patient’s condition, NPPV with an NT was used and the patient was extubated on postoperative day 12. A Shiley™ 3.0-mm uncuffed endotracheal tube of 12 cm length was inserted 6 cm into the right nostril (Figure 1). Respiratory management was initiated on the NIV mode with a PEEP of 8 cmH2O. Vital signs did not deteriorate post-extubation, and no concerns were noted about the child’s acceptance even without sedation. Ventilator assistance was gradually reduced to a PEEP of 5 cmH2O on postoperative day 13. The NPPV was eventually discontinued, and the patient was transferred to the general ward on postoperative day 14 with no complications.
Discussion
We experienced a case of NPPV use with an NT that might have shortened the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and allowed for safe respiratory and circulatory management in a neonate with severe AS.
In conditions such as severe AS, which can lead to left heart failure and an increased afterload associated with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOT), reducing the afterload has favorable effects on the cardiovascular system [6]. The left ventricular afterload can be calculated using the following formula: LV afterload is proportional to the difference between left ventricle intracavitary and intrapleural pressure. An increase in the intrathoracic pressure reduces the afterload and increases the cardiac output, as alleviating heart failure has already been reported [1,7]. A higher post-extubation intrathoracic pressure was advantageous for circulatory management; therefore, NPPV was used for respiratory and circulatory support.
Compared with the other interfaces of NPPV, NT is readily available and inexpensive and has the additional benefit of reducing the nursing burden by resolving leaks exacerbated by head movements or positional changes [5,8,9]. By contrast, NT has several drawbacks. First, the risk of epistaxis during tube insertion is not negligible, particularly in patients receiving an anticoagulant [10]. Second, confirming the tube’s position is crucial in maintaining PIP and PEEP and avoiding overlooking esophageal intubation [11]. Third, regular tube suctioning is required to prevent tube occlusion [12]. Fourth, it is necessary to secure the NT in the correct position to prevent esophageal intubation [13].
The use of NIV for respiratory management after cardiac surgery has been increasing, and studies have reported its utility in avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation [4,5,14]. Furthermore, studies comparing patients with elective, post-extubation, and initial NPPV have demonstrated that the former had a shorter intensive care unit stay [15]. This case report highlights the novelty of NPPV with an NT in managing an LVOT obstruction and demonstrates its potential to alleviate afterload and facilitate respiratory and circulatory management. The use of NT as an interface for NPPV provides a more straightforward, less invasive respiratory and circulatory management strategy for severe heart failure.
Conclusions
We reported a case of using NIV with NT in a newborn with severe AS for respiratory and circulatory management of heart failure. While NT is recognized as a useful interface widely used in NIV, its proactive utilization in heart failure management remains limited. Particularly in neonates, there is scarce reporting on the use of NT-assisted NIV for acute AS management. In this case, NIV with NT potentially facilitated earlier extubation and reduced cardiac afterload. The findings demonstrate the utility of the NT in the cardiorespiratory management of severe heart failure including AS.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Soichiro Tanimura, Kenji Morimoto, Masumi Tanaka, Osamu Saito
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Soichiro Tanimura, Kenji Morimoto, Masumi Tanaka
Drafting of the manuscript: Soichiro Tanimura, Kenji Morimoto, Osamu Saito
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Soichiro Tanimura, Kenji Morimoto, Masumi Tanaka, Osamu Saito
Supervision: Kenji Morimoto, Osamu Saito
References
- 1.Physiologic effects of noninvasive ventilation. MacIntyre NR. Respir Care. 2019;64:617–628. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Noninvasive pressure-support ventilation in immunocompromised children with ARDS: a feasibility study. Piastra M, De Luca D, Pietrini D, Pulitanò S, D'Arrigo S, Mancino A, Conti G. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1420–1427. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1558-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.[Evolution of non-invasive ventilation in acute bronchiolitis] Toledo del Castillo B, Fernández Lafever SN, López Sanguos C, Díaz-Chirón Sánchez L, Sánchez da Silva M, López-Herce Cid J. An Pediatr (Barc) 2015;83:117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Non-invasive mechanical ventilation after heart surgery in children. Fernández Lafever S, Toledo B, Leiva M, Padrón M, Balseiro M, Carrillo A, López-Herce J. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0334-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Is a nasopharyngeal tube effective as interface to provide bi-level noninvasive ventilation? Velasco Arnaiz E, Cambra Lasaosa FJ, Hernández Platero L, Millán García Del Real N, Pons-Òdena M. Respir Care. 2014;59:510–517. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nitroprusside in critically ill patients with left ventricular dysfunction and aortic stenosis. Khot UN, Novaro GM, Popović ZB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1756–1763. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meta-analysis: noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Weng CL, Zhao YT, Liu QH, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:590–600. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-9-201005040-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Interface strategy during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Girault C, Briel A, Benichou J, Hellot MF, Dachraoui F, Tamion F, Bonmarchand G. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:124–131. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181928706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Noninvasive respiratory support during pediatric ground transport: implementation of a safe and feasible procedure. Millán N, Alejandre C, Martinez-Planas A, Caritg J, Esteban E, Pons-Òdena M. Respir Care. 2017;62:558–565. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation: a randomized trial of the Parker Flex-Tip™ nasal endotracheal tube with a posterior facing bevel versus a standard nasal RAE endotracheal tube. Earle R, Shanahan E, Vaghadia H, Sawka A, Tang R. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64:370–375. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0813-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Atanelov Z, Aina T, Smith T, Rebstock SE. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Nasopharyngeal Airway. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Endotracheal tube obstruction via turbinectomy during nasal intubation. Pierre R 2nd, Dym H. Anesth Prog. 2018;65:255–258. doi: 10.2344/anpr-65-04-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Accidental displacement of nasopharyngeal airway in a child on non-invasive ventilation (case report) Temsah MH. https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_8554_c20a6098b6b2a9f139396e5dcd253e5f.pdf Egyptian J Hosp Med. 2018;71:3304–3307. [Google Scholar]
- 14.A randomized trial of outcomes of anesthetic management directed to very early extubation after cardiac surgery in children. Preisman S, Lembersky H, Yusim Y, Raviv-Zilka L, Perel A, Keidan I, Mishaly D. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:348–357. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.[Non-invasive ventilation after cardiac surgery. A prospective study] Pons Odena M, Piqueras Marimbaldo I, Segura Matute S, Balaguer Argallo M, Palomeque Rico A. An Pediatr (Barc) 2009;71:13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2009.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]