Abstract
A stable crystalline organic porous salt (CPOSs‐NXU‐1) with 1D apertures has been assembled by the solvothermal method, which shows high‐sensitivity “turn‐on” fluorescence detection and large‐capacity adsorption of As(III) ions in water. The detection limits, saturated adsorption capacity, and removal rate of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for As(III) ions in an aqueous solution can reach 74.34 nm (5.57 ppb), 451.01 mg g−1, and 99.6%, respectively, at pH = 7 and room temperature. With the aid of XPS, IR, Raman, and DFT theoretical calculations, it is determined that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 adsorbed As(III) ions in the form of H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3 through hydrogen bonding between the host and guest. The mechanism for fluorescence sensitization of As(III) ions to CPOSs‐NXU‐1 is mainly to increase the energy level difference between the ground state and excited state investigated by UV–vis absorption spectra, UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra, and theoretical calculations. By constructing fluorescent CPOSs, an integrated solution has been achieved to treating As(III) contamination in the water that is equipped with detection and removal. These results blaze a promising path for addressing trivalent arsenic contamination in water efficiently, rapidly, and economically.
Keywords: adsorption, arsenic, crystalline porous organic salts, fluorescence sensing, removal
A fluorescent crystalline organic porous salt (CPOSs‐NXU‐1) is constructed, which can sensitively detect and efficiently adsorb As(III) ions in water. Through this research, an integrated material for treating As(III) contamination in water is achieved. These results show a promising path for addressing arsenic contamination in water efficiently and economically.

1. Introduction
Arsenic (As), is one of the first chemical elements known to mankind, and its compounds have been used throughout almost all of human history.[ 1 ] In nature, arsenic exists primarily as arsenite, arsenate, arsenic sulfide, and a small amount of organic arsines.[ 2 ] Although arsenate and organic arsine have low toxicity, they can be converted to highly toxic arsenite through biological or chemical pathways after entering water bodies, which can lead to cancerous lesions in many organs such as lung, bladder, liver, kidney, and skin cancers or acute arsenic poisoning after assimilation by the human body.[ 3 , 4 ] Consequently, the World Health Organisation (WHO) classifies arsenic compounds as one of the most threatening environmental toxic substances.[ 5 ] With incomplete statistics, in the current world, at least 300 million people in developing countries have suffered from varying degrees of arsenic contamination, especially the trivalent arsenic, As(III), pollution of domestic water is particularly prominent and the situation is tending to worsen.[ 4 ] WHO and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) have stipulated that the maximum concentration of elemental arsenic in drinking water is 10 µg L−1 (10 ppb).[ 5 ] The trace amounts of As(III) present in water are difficult to detect and remove, which makes arsenic contamination in natural water bodies a thorny ecological problem faced by the whole world.[ 6 ] Currently, the following methods are commonly used for the detection of elemental arsenic: the electrochemical method,[ 7 ] the colorimetric method,[ 8 ] and the atomic absorption spectrometry,[ 9 ] which are either cumbersome or require valuable instrumentation, and are not conducive to convenient and efficient quantitative detection. Fluorescence detection, due to its convenience, high efficiency, and low cost, has been extensively researched and applied in a wide range of fields.[ 10 ] In contrast to the aforementioned detection methods, the primary benefit of using fluorescent detection for arsenic stems from the development of exceptionally selective probe molecules, enabling sample testing without pre‐treatment. Additionally, fluorescence equipment can be conducive to miniaturization and portability, facilitating true in‐field testing capabilities.[ 10b ]
The detection of As is the first step to thoroughly solving the arsenic pollution in water bodies, and the efficient removal of elemental As is the crucial issue. Although various techniques exist for the removal of As from water, such as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis membrane filtration, and electrodialysis, these methods generally exhibit suboptimal removal rates, high costs, and complex processes.[ 11 ] Adsorptive separation is regarded as the most promising method for As treatment owing to facile operation, low cost, and reusability of adsorption materials.[ 12 ] The reported materials for arsenic adsorption encompass metal oxide,[ 13 ] carbon‐based materials,[ 14 ] and MOFs.[ 15 ] However, these adsorbent materials have significant drawbacks such as low adsorption capacity, poor selectivity, and undesirable water stability, which has emerged as a key challenge to the large‐scale application of adsorption for arsenic removal. Worse still, the vast majority of current arsenic detection and removal technologies are isolated from each other, which inadvertently increases the difficulty and cost of arsenic pollution treatment. Hence, it is of utmost scientific significance and application value to develop materials, that combine efficient and convenient detection as well as high capacity and high selectivity adsorption, to handle As(III) contamination of water bodies.
Crystalline porous organic salts (CPOSs), a new type of crystalline material with permanent pores formed by pairs of organic acid/base through ionic bonding,[ 16 ] have been recently utilized for proton conduction,[ 17 ] nonlinear mechanical properties,[ 18 ] and atmospheric water harvesting[ 19 ] due to their excellent stability and versatile pore structure. Comparing MOFs and CPOSs, it is evident that CPOSs have significant advantages over MOFs in terms of structural predictability and control, as well as water stability. This superiority arises from the fact that CPOSs are synthesized through a one‐step acid‐base neutralization reaction, rather than the multi‐step coordination substitution reactions used for MOFs. Furthermore, CPOSs usually have better water stability because typically prepared in water or aqueous solutions, which implies that CPOSs are more suitable for performance studies in aqueous systems compared to MOFs. Of course, constrained by the types and numbers of building blocks and the relatively shorter research timeline, CPOSs currently cannot match MOFs in terms of quantity, structural diversity, well‐defined structure‐property relationships, and scope of applications.[ 20 ]
Noteworthy, since the assembled blocks for constructing CPOSs usually consist of organic acid/base pairs with a conjugated structure, it can be predicted that by selecting appropriate organic acid/base pairs and controlling the assembly conditions, CPOSs with excellent fluorescence performance could be constructed for efficient fluorescence sensing of specific substances.[ 21 ] At the same time, the ordered pore structure of CPOSs can be effectively regulated with the help of Reticular Chemistry, enabling them to efficiently adsorb specific substances.[ 22 ] Therefore, it is theoretically possible to construct a new type of CPOSs that combines fluorescent detection and adsorptive removal to address the issue of arsenic contamination in water bodies comprehensively.
Based on the above reasons, a fluorescent CPOSs, [H2PYRIDINE ⬩ (ClO4)2]n (CPOSs‐NXU‐1), with good chemical and physical stability was constructed by using 4,4′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)biphenyl (PYRIDINE) and perchloric acid (HClO4) as the building blocks. The fluorescence sensing investigation showed that the CPOSs‐NXU‐1 could efficiently detect As(III) species in water through the fluorescence “turn‐on” mechanism and remove them by efficient adsorption under appropriate conditions, accomplishing the functional integration of detection and removal. To the best of our knowledge, it is very rare that the detection and removal of As(III) species from water can be achieved simultaneously by relying on only one crystalline material.[ 23 ] Versus the few materials that allow concurrent detection and separation of As ions, CPOSs‐NXU‐1 is truly “seamless”, namely, it does not require a stepwise procedure for detection and separation by changing the valence state of arsenic.[ 23 ] In addition, the mechanism of interaction between As(III) species and CPOSs‐NXU‐1 was interpreted with the assistance of Raman, infrared (IR), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and DFT theoretical calculations.
2. Results and Discussion
CPOSs‐NXU‐1 (CCDC 1 943 423) crystallizes in a triclinic crystal system with a P‐1 space group (Table S1, Supporting Information). The asymmetric unit consists of a doubly protonated PYRIDINE molecule (H2PYRIDINE2+) and two ClO4 − ions. Through ionic bonding, a 3D structure with 1D penetrating rectangular pores (0.77 × 0.54 nm) along the a ‐axis was assembled (Figure 1a). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) demonstrated the desirable thermal stability of CPOSs‐NXU‐1, as depicted in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). 273 K CO2 adsorption experiments and NLDFT calculations revealed that the pore width of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 nm (Figure S2, Supporting Information, inset) in coincidence with the crystallographic data. Meanwhile, CPOSs‐NXU‐1 exhibited good acid‐base stability at room temperature and could maintain structural integrity in pH = 0.3–11 aqueous solutions for at least 3 days (Figure 1b).
Figure 1.

3D stacking diagram of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 along a‐axis a) and PXRD pattern b).
At room temperature, CPOSs‐NXU‐1 exhibits a bright fluorescence emission, and the maximum emission peak is located at 468 nm (with an excitation wavelength of 276 nm, Figure 2 ), which is significantly higher than that of the free PYRIDINE ligand under the same conditions. Due to the strong luminescence emission, the fluorescence sensing ability test of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for different kinds of cations in water (Figure 3 ) was carried out, in which the cation concentration was 2.5 × 10−4 m.
Figure 2.

Solid‐state fluorescence spectra of PYRIDINE and CPOSs‐NXU‐1 at room temperature.
Figure 3.

PL spectra a) and sensitization efficiency b) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 with different metal ions in aqueous solution.
The results of fluorescence sensing showed that only AsIII ions strongly sensitized the fluorescence emission of CPOSs‐NXU‐1. The fluorescence alteration caused by other tested cations was almost negligible compared to that of AsIII (Figure 3). Meanwhile, fluorescence titration experiments (Figure 4 ) demonstrated that the fluorescence emission intensity of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 increased continuously with the addition of AsIII ions (Figure 4 inset), and the relative fluorescence emission intensity (I/I0 ) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 exhibited a good linear relationship in the low to medium concentration range (0.00–50.00 µm) (Figure 4; Figure S3, Supporting Information). According to the detection limit (DL) formula DL = 3δ/K in which δ and K were the standard deviation for 30 repeated fluorescent measurements of the blank sample and the slope of the fitted equation, I/I0 = K[AsIII]+b, respectively. The DL of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for AsIII ion was 5.57 ppb (74.33 nm)[ 24 ] lower than 10 ppb, the WHO requirement. The above results illustrate that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 can be used as a reliable fluorescence sensor for detecting As(III).
Figure 4.

Linear relationship of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 to AsIII ions in water at 0.00–50.00 µm; fluorescence titration experiments (inset).
Immunity to interference and recoverability are two important indicators for assessing the potential of fluorescent probe applications. Therefore, we repeated the fluorescence sensing of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 in the presence of threefold interfering ions. The results showed that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 still exhibited satisfactory sensitivity to AsIII ions even when high concentrations of interfering ions were present in an aqueous solution (Figure 5a). Strikingly, when we mixed all the interfering ions in equivalent concentrations with AsIII ions (Xn+), the matrix effect from the interferents unexpectedly vanished. The luminescence sensitivity (I/I0 ‐1) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 to AsIII ions was almost unchanged in 10 rounds of sensing cycles (Figure 5b), and after 10 rounds of cycling, the regenerated samples of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 showed insignificant changes in the fluorescence intensity and PXRD patterns (Figures S4 and S5, Supporting Information), as well as less than 10% mass loss of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 after 15 rounds of cycling under the existing experimental conditions, all of which indicated that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 could be a promising fluorescent sensor for detecting AsIII ions in water.
Figure 5.

a) Fluorescence sensing of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 in the presence of a threefold concentration of interferents. Xn+, all the interfering ions mixed with AsIII ions in equivalent concentrations, b) Cyclic stability of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 sensing AsIII ions.
To completely solve the problem of trivalent arsenic contamination in water bodies, discovering the presence of the contaminant is only the first step; the key lies in efficiently removing it. Because of the presence of stable 1D pore channels in CPOSs‐NXU‐1, we investigated its adsorption capacity for AsIII ions in water. Firstly, considering that the AsIII ion has four forms in aqueous solution, H3AsO3, H2AsO3 −, HAsO3 2−, and AsO3 3−, which interconverted with the change of pH. So, it is extremely necessary to investigate the effect of pH on the adsorption of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 in the pH range where the material can be stabilized (Supporting Information). As illustrated in Figure 6 , the adsorption amount of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for AsIII ions grew gradually with the increment of pH in the range of 1–7 at room temperature and reached the maximum value at pH = 7. However, when the solution's pH was further increased, there was a significant decrease in the adsorption amount, especially after the pH was greater than 9. Given that the framework of the material was stable in the experimental pH range, indicating that the presence of AsIII ions in the forms of H3AsO3, H2AsO3 −, HAsO3 2−, and AsO3 3− significantly affects the adsorption capacity of the material. At pH = 7, AsIII ions exist in an aqueous solution as H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3,[ 25 ] so it can be presumed that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 primarily adsorbed H2AsO3 − and/or H3AsO3.
Figure 6.

Effect of pH on adsorption of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 at room temperature.
Subsequently, we investigated the adsorption capacity of the materials for AsIII ions at pH = 7. As depicted in Figure 7 , CPOSs‐NXU‐1 showed excellent adsorption capacity for AsIII ions. The maximum adsorption capacity (Qm ) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for AsIII ions was calculated by fitting the Langmuir‐Freundlich‐type Baudu model[ 26 ] (Equation S3 and Table S2, Supporting Information), resulting in a value of 748.99±144.99 mg g−1 (based on As) at 273 K, which is significantly higher than that of any other known trivalent arsenic adsorption materials to date (Table 1 ). Although the adsorption of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 decreases with increasing temperature, Q m is still 451.01±37.18 mg g−1 at 303 K. Furthermore, SEM‐EDS mapping showed the homogeneous distribution of arsenic on CPOSs‐NXU‐1 after adsorption of AsIII ions (Figure 7) corroborated the effective performance of the material in adsorbing AsIII ions.
Figure 7.

(top) Adsorption isotherms of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 at different temperatures and (bottom) SEM‐EDS mapping of C, N, O, Cl, and As after adsorption.
Table 1.
Comparison of maximum As (III) adsorption capacity of some representative materials.
| Absorbent Material | Qm [mg g−1] | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| CPOSs‐NXU‐1 |
748.99±144.99 (273 K) 451.01±37.18 (303 K) |
This study |
| La2O3–CeO2 | 102.5 | [27] |
| 3Fe:2Ni:Mn | 81.9 | [28] |
| FeMnO/S(IV) | 40.5 | [29] |
| Fe─Cu─Mn (ICM) | 131.0 | [30] |
| Fe/Mn‐MOFs | 69.17 | [31] |
| Nanohydrated ZrO2/GO | 95.0 | [32] |
| Fe‐Co@MOF‐74 | 266.52 | [33] |
| NH2‐MIL‐101(Fe) | 153.4 | [34] |
| UiO‐66@PGC20% | 270.58 | [35] |
| Zn‐MOF‐74 | 211 | [36] |
| β‐MnO2@ZIF‐8 | 140.47 | [37] |
| δ‐MnO2@Fe/Co‐MOF‐74 | 300.5 | [38] |
| Zr/Mn/C | 132.28 | [39] |
| MnO2@La(OH)3 | 139.9 | [40] |
| CeMn@9CNTs | 151.06 | [41] |
The ability to quickly and efficiently remove AsIII ions from the water is another key factor that determines whether the material can finally be applied in practical applications. Based on the above experimental results, the adsorption kinetics of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 on AsIII ions were investigated at room temperature, and the experimental conditions and procedures were detailed in Supporting Information. As shown in Figure 8a, CPOSs‐NXU‐1 adsorbed up to 44.6 mg of AsIII ions within 10 min in an aqueous solution with a total trivalent‐arsenic content of 45.0 mg and pH = 7, giving a removal rate of 99.1%, while the adsorption of 44.8 mg in 30 min corresponded to a clearance of 99.6%. Continuing to extend the adsorption time, it can be seen that the adsorption amount and removal rate of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 almost maintained the constant, implying that the adsorption of AsIII ions by the material has reached equilibrium. We chose the quasi‐primary kinetic equation (Equation S4, Supporting Information) and quasi‐secondary kinetic equation (Equation S5, Supporting Information) to fit the adsorption data (Figure S6 and Table S3, Supporting Information). The results showed that the adsorption of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 was more suitable for quasi‐secondary kinetic adsorption (R2 > 0.9999), implying the presence of definite AsIII ion adsorption sites.[ 42 ] Considering the practical application scenarios, we introduced an equal mass of anionic impurities (CO3 2−, H2PO4 −, HPO4 2−, NO3 −, and SO4 2−) into the above experimental system. This allowed us to investigate the adsorption selectivity of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for AsIII ions in natural water (Figure 8b). The results showed that in the presence of an equal mass of anionic impurities and with an adsorption time of 30 minutes, the amount of AsIII ions adsorbed by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 were all greater than 43.0 mg (removal rate >95.5%), indicating a good adsorption selectivity for AsIII ions. The high removal rate, rapid attainment of adsorption equilibrium, and specific adsorption selectivity demonstrate that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 can effectively remove AsIII ions from water.
Figure 8.

a) The relationship between time and adsorption as well as removal rate of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 on AsIII ions and b) adsorption selectivity in the presence of anionic impurities.
To clarify what kind of forms of AsIII ions are adsorbed by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and to better elucidate the adsorption mechanism, we initially investigated the XPS, IR, and Raman spectra of the sample after the adsorption process, AsIII@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1 (Figures 9 and 10 ; Figures S7–S9, Supporting Information). The XPS results showed that the characteristic peak at 44.9 eV (Figure 9a) which indicated the adsorbed arsenic in CPOSs‐NXU‐1 was indeed a trivalent species.[ 43 ] Additionally, the peaks at 532.4, 399.8, 285.3, and 208.3 eV corresponded to O1s, N1s, C1s, and Cl2p respectively (Figure S7, Supporting Information). The IR spectra (Figure 9b) demonstrated that the peak at 1003 cm−1 exhibited an antisymmetric telescoping vibrational of As‐OH,[ 44 ] while the corresponding Raman spectrum (Figure S8, Supporting Information) displayed CS symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of As‐OH at 543 and 642 cm−1, also, As‐O stretching vibrations at 766, 805, and 851 cm−1 are observed in the Raman spectra, all of which imply that the adsorbed substances may be H2AsO3 − and/or H3AsO3.[ 45 ] Comparing the IR spectra of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and AsIII@CPOSs‐NXU‐1, it can be observed that the peaks at 1367 and 1057 cm−1 in CPOSs‐NXU‐1, which were attributed to the in‐plane and out‐of‐plane rocking vibrational of Cl─O,[ 46 ] had disappeared in AsIII@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 suggested an interaction between ClO4 − and adsorbed H2AsO3 − or H3AsO3, indicating that ClO4 − is the site of adsorption. Meanwhile, the double strong peaks at 1659–1564 cm−1 and the weak peak at 1557 cm−1 in CPOSs‐NXU‐1 can be assigned to the N─H vibration of pyridinium inner salts,[ 47 ] while in AsIII@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 those become single and disappears respectively, and the small peak that used to be at 1518 cm−1 was displaced to 1532 cm−1 and weakened in intensity, pointing the N─H vibration of the pyridinium inner salt is restricted after adsorption and suggests that the pyridinium inner salt might serve as another adsorption site. In addition, the peaks of AsIII@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1 in the range of 3400–2600 cm−1 were significantly weakened or even disappeared concerning those of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 (Figure S9, Supporting Information) meaning that the original C─H and N─H vibrations in CPOSs‐NXU‐1 were suppressed by adsorbed H2AsO3 − and/or H3AsO3 through host‐guest interactions.[ 48 ]
Figure 9.

a) XPS spectrum of AsIII@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1, b) IR of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and AsIII@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1.
Figure 10.

Adsorption sites and interactions between CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and HAsO3 2− a) and H2AsO3 −/H3AsO3 b), the cavity near site B with an approximate diameter of 4.8 Å c). Color code: magenta, As; red, O; gray, C; white, H; blue, N; green, Cl; yellow, the cavity schematic sphere.
To further confirm the aforementioned speculations, we conducted theoretical calculations (Supporting Information) on the adsorption of AsIII ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 using Density Functional Theory (DFT), with HAsO3 2−, H2AsO3 −, and H3AsO3 as adsorbates, respectively. As shown in Figure 10, there are two adsorption sites, A and B, in CPOSs‐NXU‐1. Site A is located at the center of the 1D pore channel of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and adsorbs HAsO3 2− through the hydrogen bonds formed by the O atoms in ClO4 − and the H atoms on the aryl ring of H2PYRIDINE2+ with the H and O atoms of HAsO3 2− (Figure 10a). Site B is positioned near the pyridinium inner salt of CPOSs‐NXU‐1, which adsorbs H2AsO3 −/H3AsO3 through the formation of hydrogen bonds between the O atoms in ClO4 − and the H atoms of the aryl ring of H2PYRIDINE2+ and the pyridinium inner salt with the H and O atoms of the adsorbent (Figure 10b). Calculations of the heat of adsorption (Eads ) revealed that the Eads values for the adsorption of HAsO3 2− and H2AsO3 −/H3AsO3 at sites A and B were 1.05 and −1.71/−1.36 eV, respectively. Considering that the heat of adsorption represents an exothermic process, it can be concluded that the absorption of HAsO3 2− is not very convincing. One step further, we calculated the Raman spectra of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 after the adsorption of HAsO3 2−, H2AsO3 −, and H3AsO3, the calculated spectra of H2AsO3 −@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and H3AsO3@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1 are in high coincidence with the measured AsIII@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1 spectra (Figure 11 ). In stark contrast, the spectrum of HAsO3 2−@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 is distinctly different from the measured ones. A combination of experimental and theoretical calculations confirms that the arsenic species adsorbed by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 are H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3 and the adsorption site is located near the pyridinium inner salt. With the identification of adsorption sites and adsorbate species, the problem of cation adsorption selectivity is then fully explained. Under the experimental conditions, all cations except AsIII ions exist as positively charged hydrated ions, [M(H2O)x]n+, however, the pyridinium inner salt, which plays a key role in the adsorption, is also electropositive, which means [M(H2O)x]n+ not being able to approach the pyridinium inner salt due to electrostatic repulsion. On the contrary, the H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3 can easily approach the pyridinium inner salt by electrostatic attraction and form hydrogen bonds to enhance interaction. Moreover, the diameter of the cavity surrounding site B is ≈4.8 Å matched to the diameters of H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3 (∼4.69 Å, based on geometry optimization, Supporting Information), rather markedly larger than the anions commonly found in the water, e.g., H2PO4 − (3.73–4.42 Å), HPO4 2‐(3.96–4.50 Å), NO3 − (2.37–3.28 Å), SO4 2− (2.90–3.40 Å), and CO3 2− (2.50–2.74 Å),[ 49 ] which indicated that the geometric size matching was another main reason for the high adsorption selectivity of H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3 by CPOSs‐NXU‐1.
Figure 11.

Calculated HAsO3 2−/H2AsO3 −/H3AsO3@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and measured Raman spectra of AsIII@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 at room temperature.
To elaborate the fluorescence sensitization mechanism of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 by H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3, we examined the PXRD (Figure S5, Supporting Information), UV–Vis absorption spectra (Figure 12a), and diffuse reflectance spectra (Figure 12b,c) before and after adsorption. As shown in Figure S5 (Supporting Information), the PXRD spectra of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 had not changed before and after adsorption, suggesting that the framework of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 remained intact during the adsorption process. After adsorbed H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3, the thermal vibrations of N─H, Cl─O, C─H, and O─H of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 in the excited state could be dramatically restricted through host‐guest interactions (Figure 10b), which enhanced the luminescence intensity of CPOSs‐NXU‐1.[ 50 ]
Figure 12.

UV–vis absorption a) and diffuse reflectance spectra b,c) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and AsIII@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1.
Meanwhile, UV–vis absorption spectra showed that the absorption peak of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 at 342 nm was blueshifted to 336 nm after adsorbed H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3, implying that the energy difference between the ground state and the excited state of the host was increased by adsorbed trivalent arsenic species. The bandgap widths of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and AsIII@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 are 2.76 and 2.81 eV, respectively, determined using the empirical formula (Equation S7, Supporting Information) through UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy which represented the adsorbed H2AsO3 − and H3AsO3 could increase the material's bandgap and electron transition energy, which in turn might enhance fluorescence emission.[ 51 ]
Simultaneously, the LUMO and HOMO energies of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and H2AsO3 −@CPOSs‐NXU‐1 were calculated (Figure 13 ) and the results showed that the energy difference between the LUMO and HOMO of the materials increased from 0.28 to 0.90 eV after adsorbed H2AsO3 −. The widening of the energy level difference led to a stronger fluorescence emission.[ 52 ]
Figure 13.

LUMO and HOMO of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and H2AsO3 −@ CPOSs‐NXU‐1.
3. Application in Real Water
To verify the fluorescence sensing and removal ability of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 on AsIII ions in real water, we took the surface runoff water of the Yellow River in Yinchuan as a sample for the experiment. First, the water samples were filtered with a 0.2 µm membrane to remove the insoluble matter visible to the naked eye. Second, the As content in the water samples was measured by ICP‐MS, and the result was 0.997 ppb (Background Value, BgV), which was lower than the DL of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for AsIII ions. So, CPOSs‐NXU‐1 could not be used for direct fluorescence sensing of the taken water samples. To fix that, we repeated the fluorescence titration experiment of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 to AsIII ions with filtered Yellow River water replacing distilled water. A small amount of hydroxylamine hydrochloride was added to the filtered Yellow River water before the experiment started to ensure the As was in the trivalent form. The experiments showed that the fluorescence emission of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 increased significantly with AsIII ions concentration in the range of 0.0 ppb + BgV to 40.0 ppb + BgV (5 ppb concentration interval), and the linear relationship between I/I0 and AsIII ions concentration remained good (Figure 14 ). The change in the shape of the emission peaks should be attributed to the interaction between CPOSs‐NXU‐1 and some substances in the Yellow River water. Besides, 20.0 mg of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 was added into 50.0 mL of filtered Yellow River water and stirred for 30 min at room temperature, followed by centrifugation. The As content in the supernatant was 0.047 ± 0.002 ppb measured by ICP‐MS, corresponding to a removal rate of 95.3%, which indicates that CPOSs‐NXU‐1 has a desirable efficacy in removing arsenic from the real water samples.
Figure 14.

The fluorescence titration experiments a) and linear relationship b) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 to AsIII ions in real water at 0.0 + BgV to 40.0 + BgV ppb.
4. Conclusion
In this work, we have constructed a new structurally stable fluorescent crystalline organic porous salt material, CPOSs‐NXU‐1. It has been demonstrated that this material not only can achieve highly sensitive fluorescence detection of AsIII ions in water but also exhibits excellent adsorption capacity for AsIII ions. The detection limits, maximum adsorption capacity, and removal rate of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 can reach 5.57 ppb, 451.01 mg/g, and 99.6% in an aqueous solution at pH = 7 and room temperature with satisfactory recyclability. Through the utilization of XPS, IR, Raman, and DFT theoretical calculations, the form of the adsorbed AsIII ions, the adsorption sites, and the type of adsorption driving force have been identified. The main mechanism for fluorescence sensitization of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 by AsIII ions is clarified by UV–Vis absorption spectra, UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectra, and theoretical calculations. By constructing CPOSs with excellent fluorescence performance, we achieved the integrated treatment of As(III) pollutants in water which provided a new and efficient approach to solving arsenic pollution economically. These results suggest that when constructing fluorescent CPOSs to meet different needs, detection, and/or adsorption, we should first design the active sites based on the specific form of the target and the potential types of interactions, then, determine the suitable acid‐base pairs in combination with the spatial volume of the target. Finally, continuous experimentation is necessary until the optimal solution is found. Relevant work is currently progressing in an orderly manner.
5. Experimental Section
Synthesize CPOSs‐NXU‐1
4, 4′‐Bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)biphenyl (PYRIDINE, 12 mg, 0.04 mmol), 6 m HClO4 (2 mL), and H2O (14 mL) were stirred for 1 h at room temperature then transferred the mixture into a 25 mL polytetrafluoro reactor. The reaction kettle was placed in a constant temperature oven at 160 °C for 3 days and then cooled to room temperature to obtain needle‐like transparent crystals. These crystals were filtered, washed three times with 10 mL of distilled water, and naturally dried in air to obtain CPOSs‐NXU‐1 (yield: 75%, based on PYRIDINE).
Luminescence Sensing Measurements
The fine ground CPOSs‐NXU‐1 (50.0 mg) was dispersed in 50 mL water and treated by ultrasonication for approximately 60 min, and then aged for 24 h to form stable suspensions. The obtained suspension was used for fluorescent sensing experiments. For cations luminescence detection, 50 µL of 10.0 mmol L−1 M(NO3)n (n = 1–3) (M = Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Ba2+, Al3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+) and As(III) ion aqueous solution was added to a 1.95 mL suspension.
Regeneration of CPOSs‐NXU‐1
Post‐experimental CPOSs‐NXU‐1 was collected by centrifugation, washing with deionized water, filtration, and vacuum drying for 8 h at 60 °C. The collected sample was stirred in pH = 11 NaOH solution for 1 h, then centrifuged and washed, the same process was repeated three times. Further, the sample was immersed in 0.01 m HClO4 solution overnight, followed by centrifugation, washing with deionized water, washing with anhydrous alcohol, and vacuum drying for 12 h at 50 °C. Ultimately, the regenerated CPOSs‐NXU‐1 were obtained.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
X.Y. and Q.G. contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22261045 and 21761028), the National First‐rate Discipline Construction Project of Ningxia (NXYLXK2017A04), and the Key Research and Development Projects of Ningxia (2020BEG03020).
Yang X., Guo Q., Liu X., Ma J., Integrated Solution for As(III) Contamination in Water Based on Crystalline Porous Organic Salts. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2403539. 10.1002/advs.202403539
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.a) Jomova K., Jenisova Z., Feszterova M., Baros S., Liska J., Hudecova D., Rhodes C. J., Valko M., J. Appl. Toxicol. 2011, 31, 95; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Tsuji J. S., Garry M. R., Perez V., Chang E. T., Toxicology 2015, 337, 91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shaji E., Santosh M., Sarath K. V., Prakash P., Deepchand V., Divya B. V., Geosci. Front. 2021, 12, 101079. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Khalequzzaman M., Faruque F S., Mitra A. K., Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He. 2005, 2, 204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) Ravenscroft P., Brammer H., Richards K., Arsenic Pollution: a Global Synthesis, Vol. 28, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey: 2009; [Google Scholar]; b) Bakshi S., Banik C., Rathke S. J., Laird D. A., Water Res. 2018, 137, 153; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Ahoulé D. G., Lalanne F., Mendret J., Brosillon S., Maïga A. H., Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 1. [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Organization W. H., Guidelines for Drinking‐Water Quality, 1, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: 2004; [Google Scholar]; b) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Drinking Water Standard for Arsenic, EPA 815‐F‐00‐015, January 2001.
- 6. Hashemniaye‐Torshizi R., Ashraf N., Arbab‐Zavar M. H., Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 8381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Moghimi N., Mohapatra M., Leung K. T., Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 5546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Das J., Sarkar P., Environ. Sci.‐Wat. Res. 2016, 2, 693. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chamsaz M., Arbab‐Zavar M. H., Nazari S., J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2003, 18, 1279. [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Chen L., Liu D., Peng J., Du Q., He H., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 404, 213113; [Google Scholar]; b) Barone P. W., Parker R. S., Strano M. S., Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 7556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.a) Ayotte J. D., Montgomery D. L., Flanagan S. M., Robinson K. W., Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2075; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bai Y., Tang X., Sun L., Yin W., Hu G., Liu M., Gong Y., Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 134143. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Luo J., Fu K., Yu D., Hristovski K. D., Westerhoff P., Crittenden J. C., ACS EST Engg. 2021, 1, 623. [Google Scholar]
- 13.a) Shipley H. J., Yean S., Kan A. T., Tomson M. B., Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28, 509; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Guo S., Sun W., Yang W., Li Q., Shang J. K., RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 53280; [Google Scholar]; c) Cui H., Su Y., Li Q., Gao S., Shang J. K., Water Res. 2013, 47, 6258; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Sharifan H., Wang X., Guo B., Ma X., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 13454; [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yang X., Wan Y., Zheng Y., He F., Yu Z., Huang J., Wang H., Ok Y. S., Jiang Y., Gao B., Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 366, 608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a) Sharma S., Desai A. V., Joarder B., Ghosh S. K., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7788; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Audu C. O., Nguyen H. G. T., Chang C.‐Y., Katz M. J., Mao L., Farha O. K., Hupp J. T., Nguyen S. T., Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6492; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Gao M., Li B., Liu J., Hu Y., Cheng H., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 654, 426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yu S., Xing G.‐L., Chen L.‐H., Ben T., Su B.‐L., Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Xing G., Yan T., Das S., Ben T., Qiu S., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zhao Y., Fan C., Pei C., Geng X., Xing G., Ben T., Qiu S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 3593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhang S., Fu J., Das S., Ye K., Zhu W., Ben T., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202208660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.a) Liu C., Bai Y., Li W., Yang F., Zhang G., Pang H., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202116282; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chen T., Wang F., Cao S., Bai Y., Zheng S., Li W., Zhang S., Hu S.‐X., Pang H., Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2201779; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhou H., Gu S., Lu Y., Zhang G., Li B., Dou F., Cao S., Li Q., Sun Y., Shakouri M., Pang H., Adv. Mater. 2024, 2401856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Das S., Heasman P., Ben T., Qiu S., Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Liu Y., Liu X., Su A., Gong C., Chen S., Xia L., Zhang C., Tao X., Li Y., Li Y., Sun T., Bu M., Shao W., Zhao J., Li X., Peng Y., Guo P., Han Y., Zhu Y., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Xie D., Ma Y., Gu Y., Zhou H., Zhang H., Wang G., Zhang Y., Zhao H., J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017, 5, 23794. [Google Scholar]
- 24.a) Ma J.‐x., Zhou T., Ma T., Yang Z., Yang J.‐H., Guo Q., Liu W., Yang Q., Liu W., Yang T., Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 383; [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang J., Huang Y., Yue D., Cui Y., Yang Y., Qian G., J. Mater. Chem. B. 2018, 6, 5174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nidheesh P. V., Divyapriya G., Cerkez E. B., Gopinath A., Banerji T., Strongin D. R., Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2022, 8, 2466. [Google Scholar]
- 26.a) Wang Y., Wang C., Huang X., Zhang Q., Wang T., Guo X., Chemosphere 2024, 349, 140736; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Baudu M., Cloirec P. L.e, Martin G., Chem. Eng. J. 1989, 41, 81. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Nhiem D. N., Duc D. H., Lim D. T., Bac N. Q., Chuc P. N., Dung D. T., Chi N. T. H., Pham N. N., Trung D. Q., Mai N. V. N., Mau T. X., Khieu D. Q., J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 29, 1310. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nasir A. M., Goh P. S., Ismail A. F., Chemosphere 2018, 200, 504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cai G., Tian Y., Li L., Zhang W., Huang R., Zhang J., Wang Q., Xu H., Zhang Y., Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 479, 147539. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhang G., Liu Y., Wang J., Li H., J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 309, 112993. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li Z., Liu X., Jin W., Hu Q., Zhao Y., J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2019, 554, 692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Luo X., Wang C., Wang L., Deng F., Luo S., Tu X., Au C., Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 98. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Fang Z., Li Y., Huang C., Liu Q., J. Environ. Chem. 2019, 80, 197. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Pandi K., Lee D.‐w., Choi J., J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 314, 113552. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ploychompoo S., Liang Q., Zhou X., Wei C., Luo H., Physica E 2021, 125, 114377. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Yu W., Luo M., Yang Y., Wu H., Huang W., Zeng K., Luo F., J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 269, 264. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jian M., Wang H., Liu R., Qu J., Wang H., Zhang X., Environ. Sci‐Nano. 2016, 3, 1186. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yin Y., Zhou T., Luo H., Geng J., Yu W., Jiang Z., Colloid. Surface A. 2019, 575, 318. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Peng B., Song T., Wang T., Chai L., Yang W., Li X., Li C., Wang H., Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 299, 15. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wang Y., Guo C., Zhang L., Lu X., Liu Y., Li X., Wang Y., Wang S., Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022, 19, 10649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Liang X., Ye Q., Zhao Y., Yang Z., Yang Q., Surf. Interfaces. 2022, 30, 101911. [Google Scholar]
- 42.a) Fang Y., Qian B., Yang Y., Song Y., Yang Z., Li H., Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134417; [Google Scholar]; b) Lin Z. J., Zheng H. Q., Zeng Y. N., Wang Y. L., Chen J., Cao G. J., Gu J. F., Chen B., Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 378, 122196. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Pathan S., Jalal M., Prasad S., Bose S., J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 8510. [Google Scholar]
- 44.a) Ramírez‐Solís A., Amaro‐Estrada J. I., León‐Pimentel C. I., Hernández‐Cobos J., Garrido‐Hoyos S. E., Saint‐Martin H., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 16568; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Canaval L. R., Lutz O. M. D., Weiss A. K. H., Huck C. W., Hofer T. S., Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 11861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.a) Nakamoto K., Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds, part B: applications in coordination, organometallic, and bioinorganic chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey: 2009; [Google Scholar]; b) Loehr T. M., Plane R. A., Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 1708; [Google Scholar]; c) Müller K., Ciminelli V. S. T., Dantas M. S. S., Willscher S., Water Res. 2010, 44, 5660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ma J. x., Huang X. f., Wei R. p., Zhou L. q., Liu W.s., Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2009, 362, 3440. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Yuan Y., Brady C., Annamalai L., Lobo R. F., Xu B., J. Catal. 2021, 393, 60. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Asha K. S., Bhattacharjee R., Mandal S., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. The diameter range of H2PO4‐, HPO4 2‐,NO3‐, SO4 2‐, and CO3 2‐ was obtained from existing crystal datawhich can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc. cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The CambridgeCrystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK; fax: +441223 336033. H 2 PO 4‐ : CCDC 287356, 197708,217435, 1474069, 180793 and CSD ADENPH, MGUANP10; HPO4 2‐ : CCDC 703418, 1050472, 1050475, 850375, 789162, 916142, and CSD BIDMIK, BIXLUP; NO3‐: CCDC 850661, 850669, 2103184, 821880, 2104532, 162694, 776362, 812585, 1466145,1825037; SO4 2‐ : CCDC 1488239, 224887, 224891, 1100244,788161, 701147, 255906, 287911, 287913, 186055; CO3 2‐ : CCDC 1475780, 1416048, 1496014, 1413649, 1429570, 670642, 1109931, 1109914, 2224090,2065480.
- 50. Wang S., Liu J., Feng S., Wu J., Yuan Z., Chen B., Ling Q., Lin Z., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202400742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.a) Yao M.‐S., Li W.‐H., Xu G., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 426, 213479; [Google Scholar]; b) Wu A.‐Q., Wang W. Q., Zhan H. B., Cao L. A., Ye X. L., Zheng J. J., Kumar P. N., Chiranjeevulu K., Deng W. H., Wang G. E., Yao M. S., Xu G., Nano Res. 2021, 14, 438. [Google Scholar]
- 52.a) Belousov Y. A., Drozdov A. A., Taydakov I. V., Marchetti F., Pettinari R., Pettinari C., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 445, 214084; [Google Scholar]; b) Razavi S. A. A., Morsali A., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 415, 213299; [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang Y., Huang Y., Miao R., Chen H., Small Struct. 2023, 4, 2300157. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
