Skip to main content
Advanced Science logoLink to Advanced Science
. 2024 Jun 26;11(32):2403198. doi: 10.1002/advs.202403198

Near‐Complete Suppression of NIR‐II Luminescence Quenching in Halide Double Perovskites for Surface Functionalization Through Facet Engineering

Qiudong Duan 1, Yusheng Xu 1, Yu Zha 1, Fanju Meng 1, Qi Wang 1, Yugeng Wen 1,, Jianbei Qiu 1,
PMCID: PMC11348257  PMID: 38932471

Abstract

Lanthanide‐based NIR‐II‐emitting materials (1000–1700 nm) show promise for optoelectronic devices, phototherapy, and bioimaging. However, one major bottleneck to prevent their widespread use lies in low quantum efficiencies, which are significantly constrained by various quenching effects. Here, a highly oriented (222) facet is achieved via facet engineering for Cs2NaErCl6 double perovskites, enabling near‐complete suppression of NIR‐II luminescence quenching. The optimally (222)‐oriented Cs2Ag0.10Na0.90ErCl6 microcrystals emit Er3+ 1540 nm light with unprecedented high quantum efficiencies of 90 ± 6% under 379 nm UV excitation (ultralarge Stokes shift >1000 nm), and a record near‐unity quantum yield of 98.6% is also obtained for (222)‐based Cs2NaYb0.40Er0.60Cl6 microcrystallites under 980 nm excitation. With combined experimental and theoretical studies, the underlying mechanism of facet‐dependent Er3+ 1540 nm emissions is revealed, which can contribute to surface asymmetry‐induced breakdown of parity‐forbidden transition and suppression of undesired non‐radiative processes. Further, the role of surface quenching is reexamined by molecular dynamics based on two facets, highlighting the drastic two‐phonon coupling effect of a hydroxyl group to 4I13/2 level of Er3+. Surface‐functionalized facets will provide new insights for tunable luminescence in double perovskites, and open up a new avenue for developing highly efficient NIR‐II emitters toward broad applications.

Keywords: double perovskites, emission mechanism, facet engineering, NIR‐II luminescence quenching, surface functionalization


The preferred (222) facet in Cs2NaErCl6 double perovskite is favorable for Er3+ 1540 nm emission with a record quantum yield of 98.6% under 980 nm excitation, which is useful for surface modification. These findings suggest facet engineering is a new way for realizing highly efficient Er3+‐based NIR‐II emitters toward broad applications.

graphic file with name ADVS-11-2403198-g007.jpg

1. Introduction

Luminescent materials exhibiting emission between 700 and 1700 nm within the NIR region have been emerging in recent years since they are in demand for a range of present and next‐generation optical and optoelectronic applications including solid‐state lighting, solar cell conversion, NIR phosphor‐converted light‐emitting diode (pc‐LED), optical communication, as well as in vivo and in vitro imaging and sensing.[ 1 , 2 , 3 ] Among them, lead‐free halide perovskites are considered promising luminescent candidates for greatly overcoming the instability and toxicity of lead halide perovskites.[ 4 ] Specially, halide double perovskites (DPs) with the general formula A2M+M3+X6 possess a number of unique advantages, such as high stability, low toxicity, high wavelength tunability, and excellent photophysical properties, making them suitable for visible and NIR emissions.[ 5 , 6 , 7 ] What is more, the octahedral coordination environment in DPs provides abundant opportunities for doping with lanthanide (Ln3+), transition metal ions (Mn2+ and Cr3+), and ns2 electrons of Bi3+ and Sb3+.

In particular, trivalent Ln3+ ions with unique 4f electronic configuration and rich energy levels can produce NIR light, covering from NIR‐I (700–1000 nm) to NIR‐II (1000–1700 nm) and beyond. For example, the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) as high as 82.5% at 997 nm was reported for the Yb3+‐doped Cs2AgBiBr6 film.[ 6a ] Specially, an NIR‐II light at 1540 nm is needed because of its great promise in NIR photography, deep‐tissue, optical communication, and high‐resolution imaging.[ 8 ] Although 1540 nm emission can be supplied by the 4I13/24I15/2 transition of Er3+, Er3+‐doped DPs inevitably suffer from poor PLQY due to low absorption coefficient, parity‐forbidden optical transition, and inefficient energy transfer. It has thus remained a challenge to obtain bright Er3+ 1540 nm emission. Doping ions can be an effective method for improving NIR efficiency, yet the concentration of lanthanide ions should be carefully controlled because of concentration quenching. In particular, cross‐relaxation between lanthanide ions at high doping levels is historically regarded as the major course of concentration quenching,[ 9 ] leading to luminescence quenching in Ln3+‐doped DP single crystals.

Crystal orientation correlates closely to the properties of materials for various applications such as solar cells, battery systems, and photocatalysis.[ 10 , 11 , 12 ] However, it is quite difficult to tailor the facet orientation in DPs due to the uncontrolled crystal growth process. Currently, nearly all the DPs have the same (220)‐dominated facet,[ 13 ] and thus it is impossible to investigate the impact of crystal orientation on their optical properties. However, from the viewpoint of facet orientation, it may be a new way to manipulate visible and NIR luminescence and provides an important insight into the photophysical pathways in DPs.

Here, we report that the preferred high‐index (222) facet is thoroughly favorable for Er3+ 1540 nm emission in Cs2NaErCl6 DPs under multiwavelength‐excitation, exhibiting a record quantum yield up to 98.6% under 980 nm excitation. In particular, we demonstrate the major deactivation pathway at high Er3+ concentrations is surface quenching via high‐energy vibrations of the surface OH group, providing a fundamental mechanistic understanding of various quenching pathways, which are commonly misunderstood in Er‐based microcrystallites.

2. Results and Discussion

The synthetic method of Cs2NaErCl6 DPs can be seen in the Supporting Information. Figure  1a shows the evolution of two different facets from cubic unit cells. The growth rate is exponentially proportional to the surface energy of each crystal facet,[ 14 ] and therefore the conventional DP crystals will be enclosed by (220) facets with minimum surface energy. Meanwhile, the crystallographic planes can also be controlled by the growth rate ratio along the (100) to that of (111),[ 15 ] indicating the possible controllable growth of (111) facet. It should be noted that (111) and high‐index (222) facets are equally crystallographic orientations with similar truncated octahedral or octahedral shapes. It is expected that the surface properties of DP crystals would be different due to diverse atomic arrangement and coordination. Figure 1b exhibits atomic arrangements of (220) and (222) facets on a perovskite cubic crystal. The (222) facet can be terminated 3/8 Cs cation and 3/2 chloride anion, which are negatively charged. In contrast, (220) facet shows positively charged characters due to less chloride anions. Thus, this big difference is an essential prerequisite for tailoring the luminescent properties of DPs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Schematic diagram of the evolution of (222) and (220) facets from cubic unit cell. b) Atomic arrangements of (220) and (222) facets on a perovskite cubic crystal.

X‐ray diffraction (XRD) was used to evaluate the orientation of Cs2NaErCl6 DP. The Cs2NaErCl6 samples with favorable (220) plane, labeled as CNEC (220), show the same XRD patterns with the standard card (PDF#89‐0053) and as‐reported Cs2NaErCl6 DPs (Figure  2a).[ 16 ] Most impressively, (222) facet orientation is dramatically promoted after altering the growth rate, marked as CNEC (222), indicating that the preferred orientation turns to (222) from conventional (220). Similarly, Ag‐alloyed Cs2NaErCl6 DPs simplified as CNEC: Ag (222), don't change the oriented (222) crystal plane. The XRD Rietveld refinement results demonstrate that both pristine Cs2NaErCl6 and Ag‐alloyed Cs2NaErCl6 (222) samples still belong to the Fm‐3m space group and exhibit a highly symmetrical face‐centered cubic crystal structure (Figure 2b; Table S1, Supporting Information). The decreased lattice parameters after Ag doping are a result of stronger covalency between Ag+ and Cl. XRD pole‐figure was further used to unveil the preferred facet distribution. The (222) peak intensity of pristine CNEC (222) is mainly located at the center, suggesting that (222) facet is one dominant plane (Figure 2c). Meanwhile, pole figures of (444) and (220) facets are also obtained (Figure 2d; Figure S2, Supporting Information) for roughly analyzing the crystal planes. As seen in Figure 2e, the percentage of (222) is calculated to be 60%, and the total percentage of (111) and (444) is estimated to be 30%. Thus, (222) facet and its equal orientations are dominate in controlled CNEC samples.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a) XRD patterns of undoped and 10% Ag+‐doped CNEC (222) and CNEC (220). b) XRD Rietveld refinement of CNEC:10% Ag (222). c,d) Normalized (222) and (444) pole figures of pristine CNEC (222). e) The facet distribution calculated from the average areal ratio for five CNEC:10% Ag (222) samples. f) HRTEM image and SAED pattern of pristine CNEC (222). g) SEM image of CNEC:10% Ag (222). h) Crystal structure of CNEC (222) in side view and top view. i) HRTEM image and SAED pattern of CNEC:10% Ag (222).

The modeling (222) crystal structure agrees well with those determined by electron microscopy (Figure 2h; Figure S3, Supporting Information). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show that the products are micro‐sized crystals with uniform distribution of all the elements using energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS). The actual doping contents were determined from both EDS and the induced coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry in Table S2 and Figure S4 (Supporting Information). A truncated octahedral shape is observed based on CNEC:10% Ag (222), a typical shape of (111) or (222) facets in perovskites (Figure 2g). The high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images confirm a high crystallinity and the lattice spacing values are 3–3.1 Å, corresponding to the (222) lattice planes (Figure 2f–i). Meanwhile, all the selected area electron diffraction patterns exhibit polycrystalline rings, which can be attributed to the polycrystal characteristics of as‐prepared samples (Figure S5, Supporting Information).

The optical properties of CNEC (222) and Ag‐alloyed CNEC (222) with different concentrations were systematically studied to check the facet effect. Figure  3a shows UV–vis absorption spectra of undoped and 10% Ag+‐doped CNEC (222) and CNEC (220). All the absorption curves are similar with intense absorption peaks at 379 and 524 nm, arising from characteristic f–f transitions of Er3+. PL excitation (PLE) spectra are consistent with absorption spectra at 1540 nm for Ag‐alloyed CNEC (222) with different concentrations (Figure 3b). Although self‐trapped excitons (STE) typically exist in Ag‐based materials due to Jahn–Teller distortion, low‐temperature PL data present that narrow 554 nm emission corresponding to 4S3/24I15/2 transition of Er3+ is observed instead of broad STE emission for CNEC:10% Ag (222), indicating very weak electron‐phonon coupling (Figure 3c). Meanwhile, both green and red emissions are largely suppressed with increasing temperature based on (222) facets compared with (220) counterparts (Figure S6, Supporting Information), which can also be considered as another kind of “non‐radiative” emissions compared with desired 1540 luminescence. The short‐wave infrared emission shows main non‐asymmetrical peaks at 1540, 1547, and 1561 nm under 365 or 379 nm excitation, corresponding to Stark splitting 4I13/2 sublevels of Er3+ (Figure 3d; Figure S7, Supporting Information). Besides, only a weak 808 nm emission can be found in PL spectra, which can be assigned to the 4I9/24I15/2 transition of Er3+. The PL decay curves of Ag‐alloyed CNEC (222) with different concentrations were then measured (Figure 3e; Table S3, Supporting Information). The lifetimes of all the samples exhibit a single‐exponential function, with a maximum value of 21.05 ms for CNEC:10% Ag (222), in consistent with PLQY results (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Further increased Ag+ content would reduce lifetime, as an evidence of enhanced non‐radiative recombination rate.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

a) UV–vis absorbance spectra of undoped and 10% Ag+‐doped CNEC (222) and CNEC (220). b) PLE spectra of Ag‐alloyed CNEC (222) with different concentrations. c) Pseudo colormap of temperature‐dependent (80–220 K) PL in the visible range for CNEC:10% Ag (222) under 365 nm excitation. d) PL spectra of (222)‐dominated CNEC samples with different Ag+ contents under 365 nm excitation. e) The PL decay curves of Ag‐alloyed CNEC (222) with different doping concentrations under 365 nm excitation. f) The measured PLQY values for CNEC:10% Ag (222) under different excitation wavelengths. g,h) The statistical PLQY values for pristine CNEC (222) and CNEC:10% Ag (222) under 379 nm excitation, respectively. i) The refractive index measurements of pristine CNEC (222) and CNEC (220).

Surprisingly, high PLQYs in the range of 1500–1700 nm can be obtained with different excitation wavelengths, including 300, 365, 379, and 524 nm (Figure 3f; Figures S9–S12, Supporting Information). In particular, the pristine CNEC (222) samples show the average PLQY of 61% (Figure 3g), in strikingly contrast to 24% on conventional (220) counterparts (Figure S13, Supporting Information), demonstrating strong facet effect on Er3+ 1540 nm emission in Cs2NaErCl6 DPs. The best‐performing CNEC:10% Ag (222) samples exhibit high quantum efficiencies of 90 ± 6% under 379 nm UV excitation (Figure 3h). The accurate refractive index is measured by QT‐TO1000 terahertz imaging system, as displayed in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). The refractive indexes are 2.54 and 2.38 for pristine CNEC (220) and CNEC (222), respectively. The refractive index is also different due to the anisotropic facets of Cs2NaErCl6 DPs.

Meanwhile, obvious Er3+ 1540 nm luminescence can also be achieved for Yb3+‐doped CNEC (222) under 980 nm excitation. The corresponding characterizations can be seen in Figure S14 (Supporting Information). (222) facet enables high‐concentration doping of Yb3+, which is beneficial for bright emission (Figure  4a). The fitting lifetimes of all the samples exhibit the single‐exponential function, with a maximum value of 36.74 ms for CNEC:40% Yb (222), as shown in the PL decay curves (Figure 4b; Figure S15 and Table S4, Supporting Information). PL decay curves at different emission wavelengths were also measured to better understand the excited‐state dynamics in Cs2NaErCl6 DPs (Figure S16 and Table S5, Supporting Information). The NIR‐II emission is originated from an energy transfer from Yb3+ to Er3+ because the emission intensity shows a linear relationship with the pump power of the 980 nm laser (Figure 4c). Furthermore, both pristine CNEC (222) and Yb3+‐doped CNEC (222) samples exhibit high quantum efficiencies under 980 nm excitation (Figure 4d; Figures S17 and S18, Supporting Information). Specially, CNEC:40% Yb (222) shows a near‐unity quantum yield of 98.6% under 980 nm excitation, which is the highest value for Er‐based halide perovskites, to the best of our knowledge (Table S6, Supporting Information). Moreover, the operational stability of DP emitters under continuous illumination with 379 and 980 nm has been measured as shown in Figure S19 (Supporting Information). The samples show good emission stability over 100 h with negligible degradation of PLQY, indicating their potential for broad applications.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

a) PL spectra of (222)‐dominated CNEC samples with different Yb+ contents under 980 nm excitation. b) The PL decay curves of CNEC (222) and CNEC:40% Yb (222) under 980 nm excitation. c) The power density dependence of 1540 nm emission for CNEC:40% Yb (222) under 980 nm excitation. d) The measured PLQY values for pristine CNEC (222) and Yb3+‐doped CNEC (222) under 980 nm excitation.

The PLQY is defined as the ratio of the radiative recombination rate (kr ) to the sum of the radiative and non‐radiative (knr ) recombination rates. Therefore, increasing kr and reducing knr are two strategies to enhance the PLQY. As presented in Table  1 , kr of pristine CNEC (222) is much larger than that of CNEC (220), meaning the effective breakdown of parity‐forbidden transition by (222) facet. Considering the bulk centrosymmetric structure of all the Cs2NaErCl6 DPs, the origin of breaking symmetry must originate from surface asymmetry due to an imbalance charged surface. The built‐in electric field at (222) surface is beneficial for alleviating the 4I13/24I15/2 transition selection rule, promoting the structure asymmetry, and enhancing the luminescence efficiency. The lower symmetry has also been verified by the larger Ω2 from Judd–Ofelt (J–O) analysis (Table 1).[ 17 ] The higher value of Ω2 /Ω4 in CNEC:10% Ag (222) confirms stronger covalency after Ag+ doping, in accord with the Rietveld refinement results (Table S7, Supporting Information). In addition, CNEC:10% Ag (222) has a slightly larger kr compared with CNEC (222), indicating the same effect of (222) facet on the symmetry or the radiative recombination rate. The calculated transition probabilities by J–O analysis are in accordance with the kr values calculated by the fitted data of the time‐resolved PL decay, providing theoretical evidence that facet engineering can manipulate the symmetry for increasing the oscillator strength to improve the PLQY.

Table 1.

Fitted average lifetimes, calculated kr and knr , J–O parameters, and transition probabilities from J–O analysis.

Sample τ [ms] kr [ms−1] knr [ms−1] Ω2 [cm2] Calculated probability [s−1]
CNEC (220) 14.94 1.61 5.09 2.35 × 10−20 674.92
CNEC (222) 14.38 4.24 2.71 3.76 × 10−20 1189.41
CNEC:10Ag%(222) 21.05 4.28 0.48 4.87 × 10−20 1199.68

On the other hand, the efficiency is usually limited by undesired competing non‐radiative processes, including multi‐phonon relaxation (MPR), surface quenching (SQ), cross‐relaxation (CR) and energy migration to defects (EM),[ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] i.e., the total k nr = kMPR +kSQ +kCR +kEM . Specifically concerning 1540 nm emission (≈6500 cm−1 of energy gap), kMPR is closely related to phonon‐mediated relaxation, and its contribution can be omitted due to the low phonon frequency of Cs2NaErCl6 DPs according to the “energy gap law” (Figure S20, Supporting Information).[ 19 ] kEM is dependent on the density of defects. Regarding the lattice defects, they are very few in high‐crystallinity CNEC DPs as evidenced by ultra‐narrow diffraction peaks. Besides, antisite defects can also be quantitatively evaluated by the relative intensity ratio of (111) and (200) peak (I111/I200).[ 5 ] As shown in Figure S21 (Supporting Information), CNEC:10% Ag (222) has the largest I111/I200, even better than that of the standard pattern of Cs2NaErCl6, suggesting a high degree of Na(I) and Er(III) site ordering and negligible lattice defects. Although cross‐relaxation is usually recognized as the main origin of concentration quenching, its effect (kCR ) is less at high Er3+ concentrations in our case, only 1.5% for 4I9/24I15/2 transition under 379 nm excitation. Consequently, surface quenching (kSQ ) should be responsible for the facet‐dependent quantum efficiency. As shown in Table 1, the calculated knr of CNEC:10% Ag (222) is one order of magnitude slower than that of CNEC (220), proving that non‐radiative processes can be strongly suppressed by (222) facet.

It is known that 4I13/2 emission of Er3+ is very sensitive to the presence of OH vibrations, due to energy resonance for strong quenching (energy gap of ≈6500 cm–1 vs 3200–3700 cm−1 of O–H vibrations).[ 24 ] However, compared to nanocrystals, surface quenching is commonly not considered the major quenching pathway in microcrystalline materials. In our case, we can infer that the predominant deactivation pathway is indeed a surface effect via the two‐phonon coupling of OH group. To validate this conjecture, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to investigate the surface information for two facets. Figure  5a presents two characteristic vibrations at 1634 and 3430 cm–1, which can be attributed to bending vibrations of absorbed H2O molecules and stretching vibrations of O–H group. CNEC (222) exhibits much weaker vibration strengths of both H2O and OH than those of CNEC (220), indicating that (222) facet can effectively suppress the absorption of H2O and OH. Thus, much lower PLQYs of CNEC (220) are expected via an intense two‐phonon relaxation process due to strong coordination with surface species.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

a) FTIR spectra of pristine CNEC (222) and CNEC (220). b,c) Molecular dynamics simulations of the interaction between H2O molecules and (220) and (222) facets, respectively. d) The distribution of water‐number‐density along the Z axis for (220) and (222) facets. e) The calculated interaction energy for (220) and (222) facets. f) Photophysical processes for Er3+ 1540 nm emission and proposed mechanism for bright NIR‐II luminescence in (222)‐dominated Cs2NaErCl6 DPs.

Molecular dynamics simulations were further used to examine the interaction between H2O molecules and two facets (details in the Supporting Information). (220) and (222) facets were simulated as surfaces comparatively to interact with amounts of water molecules from the atomic level (Figure 5b,c). Figure 5d displays the simulation results of the distribution of water‐number densities along the Z axis. CNEC (220) surface has a higher density of water molecules, demonstrating its stronger interaction with H2O and OH species. The interaction energy per nm2 was also calculated based on the two systems. The resulting values are −196.94 and −185.32 kcal mol−1 for (220) and (222) facets, respectively (Figure 5e). From the calculation, it is clear that (220) is more energetically favorable for H2O molecules than (222) facet in terms of molecular dynamics. Both the experimental and theoretical evidences support that (222) facet can overcome the surface quenching from the coordinated water molecules.

The underlying mechanism is then proposed to explain the facet effects in Cs2NaErCl6 DPs. The energy level diagram is shown in Figure 5f. The excitation energy, for example, 379 or 980 nm, is well adsorbed by the 4G11/2 or 2F5/2 levels and then relaxed to 4I13/2 level for 1540 nm emissions. At high Er3+ concentrations, the CR process occurs inevitably, 4I13/2 +  4I13/24I15/2 +  4I9/2, although its contribution is low. Energy can diffuse or hop rapidly between Er3+ via energy migration, which may be released by the OH group from the surrounding environment. For conventional (220)‐dominated facet, the surface can absorb H2O molecules easily due to electrostatic interaction, leading to surface quenching for huge efficiency loss. In comparison, two significant benefits from (222) facet are electrostatic repulsion to OH and protection by the outside ion layer like a “core‐shell” structure. Therefore, the excitation energy can be preserved well and then converted efficiently to 1540 nm luminescence. Therefore, the studies elucidate the essence of surface quenching in Er3+‐based microcrystalline materials and offer an alternative strategy for near‐complete suppression of NIR luminescence quenching.

As proof, the negatively charged (222) surface shows surface functionalization via electrostatic interaction. It can be easily passivated by self‐assembled long‐chain organic amine for stable Er3+ 1540 luminescence or can be merged with amino polymer for NIR‐II emission in aqueous solution (Figure  6a). The cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC)‐modified (222) facets show a little luminescence degradation (Figure 6b). Besides, CNEC:50% Yb (222) is mixed with the protonated form of polyethyleneimine (PEI·HCl) to produce weak Er3+ 1540 emission under 980 nm irradiation (Figure 6c). The transparent solution indicates that DP samples are protected well by the outside polymer in the acidic aqueous environment (inset of Figure 6c). What is more, the CTAC‐modified CNEC:50% Yb (222) samples exhibit good stability over 5 months, with degradation of PLQYs slowly (Figure 6d). In contrast, PLQYs of unmodified CNEC:50% Yb (222) samples drop to only 3% in the fifth month due to high hygroscopicity of Cs2NaErCl6, as evidenced by the contact angle tests (Figure S22, Supporting Information). The effective passivation of CTAC makes sure that (222)‐dominated CNEC can be further applied for broader in‐laboratory use and potential practical applications.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

a) Schematic illustration of CTAC‐modified (222) facet and a mixture of CNEC and PEI·HCl. b) PL spectra of CNEC:50% Yb (222) samples with and without CTAC modification under 980 nm excitation. c) PL spectrum of CNEC:50% Yb (222) sample in PEI·HCl solution under 980 nm excitation. d) Stability tests of CNEC:50% Yb (222) samples with and without CTAC passivation in air for 5 months.

3. Conclusion

In summary, we have discovered anisotropic NIR‐II luminescence in lead‐free Cs2NaErCl6 double perovskites based on two different facets. The underlying mechanisms of facet‐dependent Er3+ 1540 nm luminescence are breaking the parity‐forbidden transition by the built‐in electric field at (222) surface for enhancing radiative recombination rates and suppressing various quenching processes for reducing non‐radiative recombination rates. The exact role of various quenching pathways in Er3+‐based perovskites can also been elucidated on (222) facet, including multi‐phonon relaxation, surface quenching, cross‐relaxation, and energy migration to defects. Moreover, surface quenching effects, mainly the two‐phonon coupling effect of hydroxyl group to 4I13/2 level of Er3+, show a direct impact on Er3+ 1540 nm emissions in microcrystalline materials, as evidenced by both experimental and theoretical studies. Our findings suggest facet engineering is a new way out of the existing technologies for realizing highly efficient Er3+‐based NIR‐II emitters, toward broad applications in high‐resolution fluorescence imaging, NIR LEDs, short‐wave infrared lasers, and beyond.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China‐Yunnan Joint Fund (U2241236 and U1902222), and the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202101AT070104), and the Yunnan Major Scientific and Technological Projects (202202AG050016). The authors extend their gratitude to Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Team from Shiyanjia Lab (www.shiyanjia.com) for providing invaluable assistance.

Duan Q., Xu Y., Zha Y., Meng F., Wang Q., Wen Y., Qiu J., Near‐Complete Suppression of NIR‐II Luminescence Quenching in Halide Double Perovskites for Surface Functionalization Through Facet Engineering. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2403198. 10.1002/advs.202403198

Contributor Information

Yugeng Wen, Email: wenyg@kust.edu.cn.

Jianbei Qiu, Email: qiu@kust.edu.cn.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

References

  • 1.a) Wang Y., Mazumder A., Gianopoulos C. G., Peteanu L. A., Jin R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26328; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang S.‐F., Su B.‐K., Wang X.‐Q., Wei Y.‐C., Kuo K.‐H., Wang C.‐H., Liu S.‐H., Liao L.‐S., Hung W.‐Y., Fu L.‐W., Chuang W. T., Qin M., Lu X., You C., Chi Y., Chou P.‐T., Nat. Photonics 2022, 16, 843; [Google Scholar]; c) Vasilopoulou M., Fakharuddin A., de Arquer F. P. G., Georgiadou D. G., Kim H., bin Mohd Yusoff A. R., Gao F., Nazeeruddin M. K., Bolink H. J., Sargent E. H., Nat. Photonics 2021, 15, 656. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Shi W.‐Q., Zeng L., He R.‐L., Han X.‐S., Guan Z.‐J., Zhou M., Wang Q.‐M., Science 2024, 383, 326; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhao J., Pan G., Zhu Y., Liu K., You W., Chen X., Song H., Mao Y., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 42215; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Sun J., Zheng W., Huang P., Zhang M., Zhang W., Deng Z., Yu S., Jin M., Chen X., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, 202201993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Arteaga Cardona F., Jain N., Popescu R., Busko D., Madirov E., Arus B. A., Gerthsen D., De Backer A., Bals S., Bruns O. T., Chmyrov A., Van Aert S., Richards B. S., Hudry D., Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4462; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhong C., Xu Y., Wu X., Yin S., Zhang X., Zhou L., You H., Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2309500; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Jackson C. T., Jeong S. G., Dorlhiac F., Landry M. P., iScience 2021, 24, 102156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Kent G. T., Zhuang J., Albanese K. R., Zohar A., Morgan E., Kallistova A., Kautzsch L., Mikhailovsky A. A., Vishnoi P., Seshadri R., Cheetham A. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 27850; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Guan J., Zheng Y., Cheng P., Han W., Han X., Wang P., Xin M., Shi R., Xu J., Bu X.‐H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26833; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Kim H., Han J., Ko H., Samanta T., Lee D., Jeon D., Kim W., Chung Y.‐C., Im W., Cho S., ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 3621; [Google Scholar]; d) Wang L., Guo Q., Duan J., Xie W., Ji G., Li S., Chen C., Li J., Yang L., Tan Z., Xu L., Xiao Z., Luo J., Tang J., ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 4245. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Luo J., Wang X., Li S., Liu J., Guo Y., Niu G., Yao L., Fu Y., Gao L., Dong Q., Zhao C., Leng M., Ma F., Liang W., Wang L., Jin S., Han J., Zhang L., Etheridge J., Wang J., Yan Y., Sargent E. H., Tang J., Nature 2018, 563, 541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Tran M. N., Cleveland I. J., Geniesse J. R., Aydil E. S., Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 2191; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chen D., Zhang X., Wei J., Zhou L., Chen P., Pang Q., Zhang J., Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 4695; [Google Scholar]; c) Wang Y., Dang P., Qiu L., Zhang G., Liu D., Wei Y., Lian H., Li G., Cheng Z., Lin J., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, 202311699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Mehedi Hasan M., Kabir A., J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 407; [Google Scholar]; b) Duan Q., Xu Y., Yang R., Hong D., Zhou D., Wang Q., Yang Y., Han J., Wen Y., Qiu J., Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024, 11, 246; [Google Scholar]; c) Ma Z., Li Q., Luo J., Li S., Sui L., Zhao D., Yuan K., Xiao G., Tang J., Quan Z., Zou B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 15176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Gan W., Cao L., Gu S., Lian H., Xia Z., Wang J., J. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 5291; [Google Scholar]; b) Saikia S., Joshi A., Arfin H., Badola S., Saha S., Nag A., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, 202201628; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Cai T., Shi W., Wu R., Chu C., Jin N., Wang J., Zheng W., Wang X., Chen O., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 3200; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Arfin H., Kaur J., Sheikh T., Chakraborty S., Nag A., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 11307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Chan E. M., Levy E. S., Cohen B. E., Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5753; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang Y., Liu X., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 702; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Chen W., Jin M., Tang J., Li Y., Chen C., Xiang J., Li Z., Guo C., J. Lumin. 2023, 263, 120132; [Google Scholar]; d) Han S., Tu D., Xie Z., Zhang Y., Li J., Pei Y., Xu J., Gong Z., Chen X., Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2203735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Ma C., Eickmeyer F. T., Lee S.‐H., Kang D.‐H., Joon Kwon S., Gratzel M., Park N.‐G., Science 2023, 379, 173; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ma C., Kang M.‐C., Lee S.‐H., Zhang Y., Kang D.‐H., Yang W., Zhao P., Kim S.‐W., Kwon S. J., Yang C.‐W., Yang Y., Park N.‐G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 24349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Zhang Y., Zhao P., Nie Q., Li Y., Guo R., Hong Y., Deng J., Song J., Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2211032; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang C., Yuan L., Liu C., Li Z., Zou Y., Zhang X., Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Wei G., Yu C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 7791; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang Q., Luan J., Huang X., Wang Q., Sun D., Tang Y., Ji X., Wang H., Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.a) Luo C., Zheng G., Gao F., Wang X., Zhao Y., Gao X., Zhao Q., Joule 2022, 6, 240; [Google Scholar]; b) Wang Z., Lin Q., Chmiel F. P., Sakai N., Herz L. M., Snaith H. J., Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17135; [Google Scholar]; c) Leblebici S. Y., Leppert L., Li Y., Reyes‐Lillo S. E., Wickenburg S., Wong E., Lee J., Melli M., Ziegler D., Angell D. K., Frank Ogletree D., Ashby P. D., Toma F. M., Neaton J. B., Sharp I. D., Weber‐Bargioni A., Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16093. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.a) Gong X., Zhang X., Li L., Xu J., Ding R., Yin H., Zhang Z., Li Q., Liu L., Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 1879; [Google Scholar]; b) Li X., Wang D., Zhong Y., Jiang F., Zhao D., Sun S., Lu P., Lu M., Wang Z., Wu Z., Gao Y., Zhang Y., Yu W. W., Bai X., Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2207571; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wang M., Zeng P., Wang Z., Liu M., Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903662; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Chen Y., Zeng R., Wei Q., Zhang S., Luo B., Chen C., Zhu X., Cao S., Zou B., Zhang J., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 8529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Huang K., Yong L., Feng S., Inorg. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 965. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wang Z. L., J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 1153. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.a) Zhang G., Dang P., Lian H., Huang S., Yang W., Cheng Z., Lin J., Adv. Optical Mater. 2022, 10, 2201220; [Google Scholar]; b) Wu R., Han P., Zheng D., Zhang J., Yang S., Zhao Y., Miao X., Han K., Laser Photonics Rev. 2021, 15, 2100218. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.a) Wang Y., Wang X., Mao Y., Dorman J. A., J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 11715; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dong H., Sun L.‐D., Yan C.‐H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 20546; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Hao J., Zhang Y., Wei X., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rabouw F. T., Prins P. T., Villanueva‐Delgado P., Castelijns M., Geitenbeek R. G., Meijerink A., ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shi R., Mudring A.‐V., ACS Materials Lett. 2022, 4, 1882. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pini F., Frances‐Soriano L., Peruffo N., Barbon A., Hildebrandt N., Maria Natile M., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 11883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang Z., Meijerink A., J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 26298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Johnson N. J. J., He S., Diao S., Chan E. M., Dai H., Almutairi A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mei S., Zhou J., Sun H.‐T., Cai Y., Sun L.‐D., Jin D., Yan C.‐H., Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.a) Huang B., Bergstrand J., Duan S., Zhan Q., Widengren J., Agren H., Liu H., ACS Nano 2018, 12, 10572; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Medvedev E. S., J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 137, 174307; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wu Y., Li F., Wu Y., Wang H., Gu L., Zhang J., Qi Y., Meng L., Kong N., Chai Y., Hu Q., Xing Z., Ren W., Li F., Zhu X., Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2341; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Monguzzi A., Milani A., Lodi L., Italo Trioni M., Tubino R., Castiglioni C., New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1542. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.


Articles from Advanced Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES