Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Aug 12;7(16):18786–18800. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.4c02214

Influence of High-κ Dielectrics Integration on ALD-Based MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor Performance

Reyhaneh Mahlouji †, Yue Zhang ‡, Marcel A Verheijen †,§, Saurabh Karwal ⊥, Jan P Hofmann ‡,∥, Wilhelmus M M Kessels †, Ageeth A Bol †,#,*
PMCID: PMC11348321  PMID: 39206351

Abstract

graphic file with name an4c02214_0012.jpg

The integration of high-κ dielectrics on MoS2 field-effect transistors (FETs) is essential for the realization of MoS2 in ultrascaled nanoelectronic devices and circuits. Most studies covering this topic are based on exfoliated MoS2 flakes or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) grown MoS2 films, whereas other techniques, such as atomic layer deposition (ALD), are also gaining attention for the growth of MoS2 in recent years. In this work, we grow large-area MoS2 by means of plasma-enhanced (PE-)ALD and evaluate the influence of high-κ dielectrics on the properties of ALD-based MoS2 FETs through electrical characterization combined with surface-chemical and high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HR-STEM) analyses. We grow HfOx, AlOx, or both by means of PE-ALD or thermal ALD on our fabricated devices and show that, in addition to the dielectric constant, three other major parameters related to the processing of the dielectrics can simultaneously affect the MoS2 FET electrical characteristics and govern its doping. These parameters are the stoichiometry of the dielectric, its carbon impurity content, and the degree to which the MoS2 surface oxidizes upon the dielectric growth. When grown at 100 °C, our HfOx films are oxygen-vacant whereas our AlOx films are oxygen-rich. In addition, carbon impurities are incorporated into the dielectrics at low deposition temperatures, being one of the likely causes of the MoS2 FET overall n-type performance in all of the studied cases. Our investigations also reveal that PE-ALD of HfOx or AlOx oxidizes the MoS2 surface, whereas thermal ALD AlOx leaves MoS2 almost intact. In this respect, if thermal ALD AlOx of proper thickness is grown between MoS2 and HfOx, it can reduce the degree to which the MoS2 surface oxidizes by HfOx and meanwhile improve the total dielectric constant, altogether leading to the most optimal electrical performance in ALD-based MoS2 FETs.

Keywords: high-κ dielectrics, atomic layer deposition, MoS2 field-effect transistors (FETs), charge transfer doping, current−voltage (I−V) characterization, XPS, STEM-EDX

1. Introduction

Ever since layered two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) were highlighted as potential material candidates for sub-10 nm technology nodes,1−3 there has been a growing interest in validating the feasibility of their implementation into such prospective platforms.3−6 Among the 2D TMDCs with semiconducting properties, MoS2 is the most extensively studied material, especially in the context of field-effect transistors (FETs). MoS2 FET device metrics are continually progressing, with the highest records being so far held for a current density of 700–1135 μA/μm,7−9 a subthreshold swing (SS) close to the thermionic limit (∼60 mV/dec),10,11 a field-effect mobility (μFE) of 200 cm2/(V·s),12 and a low contact resistance (Rc) range of 123–480 Ω·μm,7,9,13 although none of these figures of merits have been demonstrated all together in the same device. Besides these fascinating device properties, MoS2 FETs have demonstrated relatively low variability, good reproducibility, and decent reliability,10,14,15 as other vital conducts for their realization into more complex circuits.10,16 However, implementation of emerging materials on technology-relevant scales has its own challenges. As with semiconducting MoS2, there are yet several major hurdles that first need to be surmounted. Among them, the integration of nanometer-thin high dielectric constant (high-κ) materials with MoS2 FETs, as well as the large-area synthesis of high quality MoS2 films, is of crucial importance.

High-κ materials, such as HfO2, ZrO2, and Al2O3, are commonly used as gate dielectrics in FETs, with the aim of boosting the gate electrostatic control over the channel material.17 In conventional Si-based FETs, ultrathin layers of high-κ (<2 nm),18 which are necessary for downscaling the size of devices, can be successfully grown by means of atomic layer deposition (ALD). ALD is a cyclic thin film deposition technique that is well settled in industry and results in thickness-controlled, highly uniform, conformal and continuous films, free of pinholes.19 During the ALD process, layer growth is mainly governed by surface chemical reactions between the substrate of choice and the ALD reactants.

As far as the ALD growth of dielectrics on 2D MoS2 is considered, due to the all-surface and chemically inert basal planes of pristine MoS2, this process is mostly hampered by the lack of surface groups to which the ALD reactants could chemisorb.20,21 Therefore, nonuniform and defective dielectric films with incomplete surface coverages are often grown on pristine MoS2, especially for sub-10 nm high-κ thicknesses.20−22 Several attempts have been made to address this issue. UV/O323 or O2 plasma24 surface functionalization and addition of a buffer/seed layer,10,25,26 prior to the high-κ deposition on MoS2, as well as employment of plasma-enhanced (PE)-ALD27,28 were overall beneficial in improving the growth quality of ultrathin films of these dielectrics on MoS2.

In addition to the gate dielectric role in FETs, high-κ materials can also act as protective or passivating layers for ultrathin nanomaterials and lead to further improvements in the electronic properties of the resulting devices.12,29 For example, capping MoS2 FETs with high-κ dielectrics, especially for back-gate devices, has been shown to highly influence the device metrics such as μFE, the maximum drive current (ION), and hysteresis.12,14,30−32 Theoretical studies have associated these improvements mainly with the efficient screening of MoS2 charged impurities (CIs) by the dipoles of high-κ materials.33−35 CIs are considered as the dominant Coulombic scattering centers in/on 2D materials, and they lead to carrier transport degradation.33−35 MoS2 CIs can have various sources, but they typically originate from intrinsic structural defects (e.g., Mo/S vacancies),36 environmental adsorbates (e.g., H2O),14,37,38 and organic residues formed during the device fabrication.11,21

Parallel to the suppression of CI scattering, high-κ materials have the capability of doping the underlying MoS2 as well. This is mainly attributed to the existence of bulk/interfacial fixed charges,39,40 which are formed when the dielectric film is sub(over)-stoichiometric and contains oxygen-vacant (oxygen-rich) states. The dielectric fixed charges can electrostatically induce carriers of opposite sign into the channel31,41 or dope the channel via a process known as charge transfer doping.42 These charges, furthermore, are shown to reduce the contact resistance (Rc) and improve MoS2 conductivity by lowering Schottky barrier height (SBH) at the contact-to-MoS2 interface.43 Both experimental and theoretical studies have shown that the charge transfer doping process via oxygen-vacant (oxygen-rich) high-κ materials (e.g., HfOx, AlOx, and TiOx) can n-type dope (p-type dope) MoS27,26,44,45 mainly because the defect energy bands in such films are distributed in the vicinity of MoS2 conduction band edge (Ec) (valence band edge (Ev)).7,44 Therefore, tuning the dielectric film stoichiometry (as recently shown43,46) can be a way forward for controllably doping the MoS2 films and improving their electronic properties. In addition to the oxygen-vacant (oxygen-rich) states, the carbon content in high-κ dielectrics is also another doping contributor,47 wherewith the carrier density and other MoS2 FET properties can be adjusted. All of these investigations highlight the determining role of the dielectrics in tailoring the electrical characteristics of MoS2 FETs.

As mentioned earlier, synthesis of high quality MoS2 films over large areas is the other challenge for the realization of MoS2 FETs in ultrascaled circuits. Although chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is one of the primary techniques to fulfill this demand,48 in pursuit of a low thermal budget (required for industrial processes) as well as a precise thickness control, (PE-)ALD has gained attention in recent years for the growth of MoS2 and other 2D TMDCs.49−51 However, films obtained by this technique are polycrystalline, with point defects and grain boundaries (GBs) inherent to their synthesis route.52

As far as the growth of high-κ dielectrics on such synthetic and polycrystalline MoS2 films is concerned, it has been shown that the dielectric layer mostly nucleates along the MoS2 GBs and defect sites. This leads to the growth of dielectric nanoribbons53 during the initial stages of the dielectric deposition and subsequently results in an incomplete MoS2 surface coverage for sub-10 nm thicknesses.53,54 Therefore, it can be inferred that the growth of ultrathin, high-quality, and highly uniform dielectrics on polycrystalline MoS2 has its own challenges, which can be different from the pristine MoS2 films obtained by exfoliation. Up until now, the integration of high-κ materials has been mainly studied on exfoliated MoS2 flakes12,21,27 or large-grain CVD grown MoS2 films,7,28,32 with no studies directly evaluating the growth of dielectrics on ALD-based MoS2 films.

In this study, we employ an ALD-based approach for the large-area synthesis of MoS2.49,55 Because of the principal differences between the morphology of ALD-based MoS2 films and those obtained by other techniques (e.g., smaller grain size, more GBs, and possibly deviating stoichiometries), the influence of the commonly used dielectrics on the electrical properties of ALD-based MoS2 films needs to be investigated independently. In this contribution, we grow AlOx, HfOx, or combinations thereof on ALD-based MoS2 FETs. Through current–voltage (I–V) characterization, we evaluate the electrical performance of the fabricated devices. We link our electrical findings to the chemistry involved at the high-κ/MoS2 interface by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. We also assess the dielectric film coverage on MoS2 in the early cycles of high-κ deposition using top view scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. MoS2 Film Synthesis

For this work, 7–8 monolayers of MoS2 were synthesized by a two-step approach, where large-area and thickness-controlled MoOx films were first grown at 50 °C using PE-ALD56 in an Oxford Instruments Plasma Technology ALD reactor (FlexAL). The as-deposited MoOx films, with a thickness of ∼4.9 nm, were then annealed in a tube furnace, where a H2S/Ar gas mixture of 10%/90% was introduced at 900 °C for 45 min, to eventually obtain MoS2 multilayers. Further details of the synthesis method and film specifications are published in a previous work.55 In all cases, the film growth took place on highly doped (p++) Si substrates, thermally coated with ∼285 nm SiO2, serving as a global back-gate for the fabricated MoS2 FETs.

2.2. Back-Gate Device Fabrication

The back-gated MoS2 FETs were fabricated using a standard two-step electron beam lithography (EBL) technique. Details of the device fabrication are reported in a previous study.57 In this work, a combination of 5/95 nm Ti/Au was electron beam evaporated as the contacts to MoS2. Then, to define the channel areas, MoS2 was dry etched using a SF6/O2 plasma gas mixture. The fabricated devices were finally capped with a 30 nm thick high-κ dielectric layer. A top-view optical microscopy image of the final MoS2 FETs and cross-sectional schematics are provided in Figures S1a and S1b, respectively.

2.3. MoS2 FET Capping with PE-ALD Grown HfOx

Investigations regarding the influence of dielectrics on the back-gate MoS2 FETs were initiated with the growth of 30 nm HfOx on the fabricated devices using the PE-ALD method at three different table temperatures of 100, 200, and 300 °C. HfCp(NMe2)3 (HyALD) and O2 plasma were the precursor and the oxygen agent used during this process, respectively.58 As HyALD precursor does not react with H2O, films of HfOx could only be grown using the PE-ALD method, and thermal ALD of HfOx could not be examined in this study. Further details and specifications of the growth process are provided in Section S.2.1 of the Supporting Information.

2.4. MoS2 FET Capping with ALD and PE-ALD Grown AlOx

Next, 30 nm thick AlOx dielectrics were grown on the fabricated MoS2 FETs using both ALD and PE-ALD processes at 100 °C.59 We note that throughout this study ALD refers to thermal ALD. For the ALD of AlOx, trimethylaluminum (TMA, Al(CH3)3) vapor and H2O were employed as the precursor and the oxygen agent, respectively, and for the PE-ALD of AlOx, TMA and O2 plasma were utilized. See the Supporting Information for further details of both methods and their processing conditions (Sections S.2.2 and S.2.3).

2.5. MoS2 FET Capping with ALD/PE-ALD Grown Bilayers of AlOx/HfOx

Bilayer stacks of AlOx/HfOx were also evaluated as capping layers for the MoS2 FETs. The processing conditions were similar as to when the AlOx and HfOx films were grown individually on the fabricated devices at 100 °C. The thickness of the entire dielectric stack was maintained at 30 nm, while examining 2.5/27.5 nm, 5/25 nm, and 10/20 nm of AlOx/HfOx stack combinations. The AlOx interlayer was grown by both ALD and PE-ALD methods, except in the case of the 10/20 nm combination where only ALD was used for the growth AlOx.

2.6. Dielectric Thickness Measurements

The data for the high-κ film thicknesses were collected using an in situ spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) instrument (J.A. Woollam Co., Inc. M-2000F, 1.24–5 eV range). The SE measurements were conducted on a control sample of 450 nm SiO2/Si. We assume that the growth of dielectrics on MoS2 is approximately the same as that on SiO2/Si substrates. The film thicknesses were obtained using a Cauchy-based fitting model in Complete EASE software.

2.7. Electrical Characterization

The room-temperature electrical measurements were performed on 500 nm long and 1 μm wide MoS2 channels using a Keithley 4200-SCS parameter analyzer, which was connected to a cryogenic probe station (Janis ST-500) operating at a base pressure of ∼1.9 × 10–4 mbar.

2.8. Surface Characterization

The chemistry involved at the high-κ dielectric/MoS2 interface was investigated using ex-situ XPS. For this purpose, the dielectric films were grown on blanket films of MoS2 with equal deposition conditions as to when they were grown on the fabricated MoS2 FETs, so that consistency could be maintained. The setup used for the XPS analyses was a Thermo Scientific K-alpha KA1066 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray radiation source (hv = 1486.6 eV). The measurements were carried out with an X-ray beam spot size of 400 μm, at a takeoff angle of 60°, and a pass energy of 50 eV combined with an electron flood gun to efficiently neutralize the existing charges on the samples as well as to correct for the nonuniform/differential charging. The acquired spectra were later chemically quantified and deconvoluted with Avantage software. All the binding energies (BEs) were calibrated with respect to the C 1s adventitious carbon peak, set to 284.8 eV.

2.9. Structural Characterization

The high-κ coverage on MoS2 was also studied using a top-view STEM imaging with a JEOL atomic resolution microscope (ARM) 200-F, operated at 200 kV and equipped with a 100 mm2 Centurio silicon drift detector (SDD) as well as an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector. The analyses took place during the early cycles of (PE-)ALD, and electron transparent SiNx TEM windows, coated with ∼5 nm ALD SiO2, were utilized as the imaging substrates. The MoS2 films were grown on these substrates under equal conditions as when they were being synthesized for devices (explained earlier), followed by relevant dielectric depositions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. HfOx Capping Layer

As already mentioned, high-κ materials can efficiently screen the MoS2 CIs33−35 and electrostatically dope this 2D layer.7,26,44,45 HfOx is one of the most studied dielectrics in the context of FETs. Throughout this section, we evaluate the influence of HfOx on the electrical performance of our ALD-based MoS2 FETs.

3.1.1. Electrical Characterization of HfOx-Capped MoS2 FETs

Initially, 30 nm HfOx was grown on the back-gate MoS2 FETs using PE-ALD58 at 100 °C. Figure 1a (left axis) shows the normalized double sweep transfer characteristics (IDS–VGS) of a device with and without HfOx. As can be seen, upon capping of the MoS2 FETs with HfOx, the device metrics improve significantly. The maximum drain current (ION) increases at least 50 times and reaches 0.5 μA/μm, the current rise in the p-branch is suppressed, and the hysteresis reduces. However, the minimum drain current (IOFF) slightly increases, and the threshold voltage (VT) shifts to more negative values.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Left axis shows the transfer curves of a device with and without HfOx grown at 100 °C (on a semilog scale). The red arrows determine the direction of forward and backward current sweeps. The right axis shows IGS in linear scale, (b) transfer curves of the MoS2 FETs capped with HfOx films grown at deposition temperatures of 100, 200, and 300 °C.

These observations imply that the MoS2 channel becomes n-type doped upon the PE-ALD of HfOx at 100 °C. In addition, the hysteresis reduction could be an indication of environmental adsorbates (e.g., water molecules) and defective states in the MoS2. By capping MoS2 with HfOx, environmental adsorbates are prevented, and the density of defective states on MoS2 surface could be reduced.14,30,32 It is also important to evaluate the gate leakage current (IGS) of the fabricated FETs. As shown in the right axis of Figure 1a, before and after the device capping, IGS is maintained well below 0.1 nA, inferring that no additional conductive path other than the MoS2 channel is present in our fabricated devices. All throughout this work, we consider the MoS2 FETs capped with PE-ALD grown HfOx at 100 °C as our reference device. Hence, the results obtained from other fabricated devices are compared with this case.

Next, the influence of the HfOx growth temperature on the electrical performance of the devices was investigated. For this purpose, 30 nm HfOx films were grown on the as-fabricated MoS2 FETs at 200 and 300 °C, while keeping all other PE-ALD conditions equal to the reference. As provided in Figure 1b, increasing the HfOx deposition temperature changes the MoS2 FET transfer characteristics. Unlike the reference, complete p-type device behavior is observed upon HfOx growth at 200 °C, with ION reaching 0.5 μA/μm. When HfOx is deposited at 300 °C, a highly degraded performance is noticed, with a minor rise in the p-branch.

Based on a former report by Sharma et al.,58 our PE-ALD grown HfOx films are substoichiometric and contain oxygen vacancies if grown below 400 °C. The oxygen vacancy states in a substoichiometric dielectric (e.g., HfOx, AlOx, and TiOx) are known to be energetically distributed in close proximity to the MoS2Ec,7,26,44,45 and introducing only 0.9% of oxygen vacancies into these dielectrics has been shown to significantly n-dope MoS2.32 Therefore, MoS2 FETs can become readily n-type doped, and Rc can be reduced43 by the transfer of charges from the dielectric oxygen vacancy states to the MoS2 + Ec.60 Sharma et al. have also demonstrated that the HfOx film stoichiometry depends on the deposition temperature, and increasing the temperature from 100 to 300 °C results in the HfOx films that are closer to full stoichiometry.58

These earlier findings can clearly explain the observed n-type device characteristics in our reference case, as the HfOx capping layer grown at 100 °C contains the most oxygen vacancies among the three studied cases. However, the electrical behavior observed for the devices capped with HfOx films grown at 200 and 300 °C cannot be attributed to the presence of oxygen vacancies. With increasing the growth temperature, the HfOx films get closer to full stoichiometry58 and, hence, lead to less n-type doping. This should manifest itself in a relative IOFF reduction and a positive shift of VT. However, a complete p-type device behavior and a decaying performance are noticed for the MoS2 FETs, with sequentially increasing the HfOx growth temperature. To explain these electrical observations, the chemistry involved at the HfOx/MoS2 interface needs to be investigated in the next step.

3.1.2. XPS Analysis of HfOx-Capped MoS2

For this purpose, ex-situ XPS measurements were conducted before and after the growth of ∼2.5 nm HfOx on bare (as-synthesized) MoS2 films at 100, 200, and 300 °C. Because of the limited depth resolution of XPS tools (∼7 nm), only 2.5 nm of HfOx was deposited in this phase, so that the HfOx/MoS2 interface could be well evaluated. Depth profiling of the stack was also not an option due to the preferential sputtering of S.

Figure 2 shows the acquired elemental data for the core level spectra of the Mo 3d and S 2p, fitted accordingly, and charge corrected against the C 1s adventitious peak (284.8 eV) (for the C 1 s spectrum, see Figure S2). The bottom panel in each plot corresponds to the bare MoS2 film with no dielectric capping, and the rest of the panels are offset vertically. Considering the Mo 3d core level spectrum of the bare MoS2 case, two major peaks (as representatives of the Mo4+ 3d5/2 and Mo4+ 3d3/2 doublet peaks) are detected at 229.8 and 233.0 eV, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mo 3d and S 2p core level spectra before and after the deposition of 2.5 nm HfOx at 100, 200, and 300 °C. Panels in each plot are offset vertically with respect to the bare MoS2.

To improve the fitting, another doublet was also required, with peaks of slightly lower BEs than the Mo4+ doublet, proposing that our synthetic MoS2 film is slightly substoichiometric and sulfur-deficient.61 At the left side of this spectrum (higher BEs), the Mo6+ oxidation state (MoOx, x ∼ 3) is also detected, which is mainly due to the exposure of the MoS2 surface to the ambient air. Finally, as a result of the S 2s core level overlapping into the Mo 3d spectrum, an extra peak is detected at a lower BE of 226.9 eV. Considering the S 2p spectrum, the S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 doublets are identified at 162.6 and 163.8 eV, respectively.

Upon the growth of ∼2.5 nm of HfOx on MoS2 at 100 °C, the intensity of the Mo 3d and S 2p major peaks drops considerably. In addition, a new peak appears at 223.0 eV, which is attributed to the Hf 4d3/2 chemical state. The integrated area under the Mo6+ doublet peaks slightly increases as well, and the Mo4+ doublet peak BEs shift −1.00 eV (relative to the Mo4+ BEs of bare MoS2). A similar magnitude of the BE shift is also detected for the S 2p core levels. These observations altogether imply that upon the growth of HfOx, the concentration of MoOx (x ∼ 3) species increases on the MoS2 surface and the MoS2 surface oxidizes. This is expected since O2 plasma is used as the oxygen agent during the growth of HfOx, and the MoS2 surface is exposed to it from the beginning of the PE-ALD process.

Elevating the growth temperature of HfOx to 200 and 300 °C, the Mo6+ doublet peaks shift to higher BEs, and the integrated area under these peaks further increases. The Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio changes from 0.44 (at 100 °C) to 1.35 (at 200 °C) and to 1.28 (at 300 °C). Details of the Mo6+ and Mo4+ doublet peak areas for all the studied cases are provided in Table S1. In addition, with increasing the growth temperature to 200 and 300 °C, both the Mo 3d and S 2p major peaks shift −1.3 and −1.1 eV, respectively, as compared with the bare MoS2 case. These findings are jointly pointing in the direction that when HfOx is deposited at temperatures higher than 100 °C, the concentration of MoOx (x ∼ 3) increases considerably, and that the MoS2 surface further oxidizes, mainly because of higher surface reactivity at elevated temperatures.

It is also important to verify that (part of) the MoS2 films are still structurally intact upon the growth of HfOx. For this purpose, a Raman analysis was performed. The data provided in Figure S3 reveal that the characteristic MoS2 Raman modes (A1g and E12g peaks) are still present after the growth of HfOx, irrespective of the HfOx deposition temperature.

3.1.3. Linking XPS Results to I–V Characterization

To correlate the XPS chemical findings with the I–V measurements, it is essential to first point out that the MoOx compound detected on the MoS2 surface is generally known as a hole dopant for MoS2, given that x ≤ 3.46,62 The MoOx bandgap (Eg) reaches up to ∼6.5 eV, and the oxygen vacancy states in MoOx energetically reside close to the MoS2Ev.62

Based on the XPS data, when the HfOx is grown at 200 °C on MoS2, the concentration of MoOx (x ∼ 3) increases significantly compared to when HfOx is grown at 100 °C. As a result, more holes can be transferred/induced into the underlying MoS2. This could explain the p-type conductivity observed for the MoS2 FETs capped with the HfOx film grown at 200 °C.

It is also expected that by raising the growth temperature of HfOx further to 300 °C, the p-type doping effect in the MoS2 FETs could become more pronounced due to the additional increase in the MoOx concentration. Although from XPS and Raman spectroscopy it can be concluded that there is still intact MoS2 under HfOx, the damage to the MoS2 surface (created by the O2 plasma usage during the HfO2 PE-ALD process) can be a likely cause for the observed device deterioration. Furthermore, one should note that the PE-ALD process of HfOx takes place in the end of the device fabrication, when the contacts are delineated and the MoS2 channel is already defined. The growth of HfOx at an elevated temperature of 300 °C can impose an additional annealing effect to the Ti/Au contacts. This is undesired, as previous studies have shown that annealing the Ti/Au contacts degrades the MoS2 FET electrical performance and increases Rc.12,37,57 Therefore, it is speculated that the observed drop in the device metrics could also be attributed to the Ti/Au interface quality that deteriorates upon the growth of HfOx at 300 °C. In addition to the MoS2 surface damage and contact annealing effect, the HfOx films grown at elevated temperatures (>200 °C) usually show higher degree of crystallinity and subsequently higher surface roughness.27,58 The increase in the HfOx surface roughness can increase the carrier scattering in MoS2.27 This can also contribute to the observed degradation in the MoS2 device performance. The effects mentioned above can altogether explain why the growth of HfOx at 300 °C does not lead to further p-type doping of the MoS2 FETs.

In summary, the dielectric growth temperature strongly influences the ALD-based MoS2 FET characteristics. PE-ALD of HfOx at 100 °C is oxygen-vacant and leads to an optimal n-type performance in the fabricated devices. When HfOx is deposited at 200 °C, the MoS2 surface oxidizes and results in the observed p-type conductivity. Then, by growing HfOx films at 300 °C, the MoS2 surface damage, the Ti/Au contact annealing effect, and the HfOx surface roughness increase can simultaneously contribute to the fully deteriorated device performance.

3.2. AlOx Capping Layer

In the next step, 30 nm AlOx capping layers were grown on the fabricated MoS2 FETs, using both ALD and PE-ALD processes. A deposition temperature of 100 °C was chosen to allow for direct comparison with the reference (HfOx case) and to prevent device degradation when the dielectric layer is grown at higher temperatures. PE-ALD can have several advantages over ALD, e.g., improved film properties and the possibility to grow the dielectrics at lower deposition temperatures. However, as seen in the previous section and observed in other studies, PE-ALD can induce unwanted damages to the underlying layer.63 As far as MoS2 is concerned, by carefully choosing the PE-ALD processing conditions, a uniform coverage of ultrathin dielectric films (AlOx or HfOx) can be achieved on exfoliated MoS2 and without severely damaging this 2D layer.27 However, the growth of AlOx with both ALD and PE-ALD as well as its nucleation behavior on the ALD-based polycrystalline MoS2 has not yet been thoroughly reported in the literature. Therefore, both methods are investigated for the growth of AlOx on our fabricated devices.

3.2.1. I–V Characterization of AlOx-Capped MoS2 FETs

Figure 3a shows the transfer characteristics of AlOx-capped MoS2 FETs and compares the data with the reference device (capped with HfOx grown by PE-ALD at 100 °C). As can be seen, irrespective of the deposition method, AlOx capping leads to an overall n-type performance in MoS2 FETs. However, compared with the reference, in both AlOx-capped devices, VT shifts positively and IOFF reduces, implying a reduced n-type doping concentration in MoS2. As far as the AlOx growth methods are concerned, a higher ION is achieved when AlOx is grown by PE-ALD on MoS2 FETs. This could be attributed to the generally higher dielectric constant of PE-ALD AlOx films compared to thermal ALD AlOx films.64 A higher dielectric constant is known to screen the MoS2 CIs and reduce the free carrier scattering more effectively,34 thereby improving the MoS2 FET ON-current density. The average data shown in Figure S4a and obtained after measuring 3–4 devices at different locations on the individual samples also confirm an overall higher ION for the PE-ALD AlOx case than the ALD counterpart. Among these three studied cases, PE-ALD AlOx-capped devices exhibit the most optimal performance due to their lower IOFF and higher ION/IOFF ratio. The average data for ION/IOFF are provided in Figure 3b, and other device metrics (mean values for the maximum μFE and IOFF) are shown in Figure S4b,c, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Semilog double sweep transfer curves of the MoS2 FETs capped with AlOx films, grown by ALD, PE-ALD at 100 °C, as well as the uncapped case. The arrow determines the relative change in VT upon the growth of AlOx on the fabricated devices. (b) Average ION/IOFF ratio after the growth of these dielectrics.

One may assign the as-observed MoS2 FET overall n-type behavior to the AlOx oxygen vacancy states.7,44 However, earlier studies59,64 have shown that our AlOx films grown below 200 °C (with both ALD and PE-ALD methods) are oxygen-rich ([O]/[Al] > 1.5). The high oxygen content at low deposition temperatures is mainly associated with the incorporation of a considerable concentration of hydroxyl (−OH) groups into the films. The AlOx used for capping our MoS2 FETs is grown at 100 °C, and our films are oxygen-rich. Therefore, the observed n-type device performance cannot be the result of oxygen vacancies.

A recent study has addressed this controversy by highlighting that the AlOx carbon content can play a significant role in n-type doping the MoS2 FETs.47 Generally, ALD of dielectrics by metal–organic precursors at low deposition temperatures leads to carbon impurities into the films due to inefficient ligand abstraction.65 The carbon-related states are energetically distributed inside the AlOxEg and close to the oxide midgap,47 such that they can donate electrons to the MoS2Ec via charge transfer doping process. Since we grow the AlOx films at 100 °C, carbon impurities are anticipated. Therefore, one potential interpretation for the overall n-type behavior of our AlOx-capped MoS2 FETs can be the incorporation of carbon impurities into the AlOx films. As far as the AlOx oxygen-rich states are concerned, their role is to reduce the MoS2n-type doping density, since they transfer holes to the MoS2Ev.7,44 This has been manifested in the positive shift of VT and the reduction of IOFF (relative to the reference case).

3.2.2. XPS Analysis of AlOx-Capped MoS2 Films

To investigate the carbon content and other chemical states at the dielectric/MoS2 interface, XPS analysis was performed before and after the growth of ∼5 nm of AlOx on bare MoS2 films. Since the HfOx capping layer is a reference for all of our analyses in this study, a comparable thickness of HfOx on MoS2 is also chemically analyzed with XPS. Figure 4 shows the acquired elemental data for the Mo 3d, S 2p, and C 1s core level spectra, with the bottom panel in each plot as a representative of the bare MoS2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mo 3d, S 2p, and C 1S core level spectra before and after the growth of ∼5 nm ALD and PE-ALD AlOx as well as PE-ALD HfOx, all at the deposition temperature of 100 °C.

Compared with the bare MoS2 case, after the growth of ALD AlOx on MoS2, the peaks associated with the Mo4+ doublet remain unchanged in the Mo 3d spectrum, and no significant oxidized species are detected (the Mo6+/Mo4+ is only 0.07 (see Table S2)). In addition, neither the Mo 3d nor the S 2p major peak intensities drop dramatically. These observations imply that the ALD of AlOx does not oxidize the MoS2 surface and that only a very thin layer of AlOx is deposited on MoS2 (as also verified by the Al 2p spectrum). As far as the C 1s spectrum is concerned, in addition to adventitious carbon, C–O chemical species are incorporated into the film composite.

In the case of PE-ALD AlOx, unlike the ALD counterpart, the underlying MoS2 film is slightly oxidized. However, the oxidation is to a smaller extent as compared with the PE-ALD HfOx case. The Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio for the PE-ALD AlOx case is 0.11, whereas it is 0.52 for the PE-ALD HfOx case (see Table S2 for a quantitative analysis). In addition, both the Mo 3d and S 2p major peaks shift −1.0 eV, being another indication of MoS2 surface oxidation. Considering the C 1s spectrum, C–O and carboxyl chemical states are detected.

Upon the growth of ∼5 nm of HfOx on MoS2, similar to what was observed earlier in Figure 2 for the growth of ∼2.6 nm of HfOx at 100 °C, there is again evidence of MoS2 surface oxidation. In this case, the Mo4+ and the S 2p doublets shift −0.9 eV. In addition, the Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio increases to 0.52 (see Table S2 for the details). As the Mo6+ and Mo4+ doublet peaks are not clearly distinguishable in the graph above, this spectrum is provided separately in Figure S5. In the C 1s spectrum, apart from the C–C adventitious peak, two other chemical states (C–O and C(=O)–OH (carboxyl)) are detected at 287.1 and 289.4 eV, respectively. Compared with the bare MoS2, the integrated area under the carboxyl peak increases upon the growth of HfOx, suggesting that a moderate amount of carbon-related content is incorporated into PE-ALD grown HfOx.

These interface observations draw our attention to several notable points:

First of all, unlike H2O, the employment of O2 plasma reactant during the PE-ALD process of AlOx and HfOx oxidizes the MoS2 surface, which is expected to facilitate the growth of these dielectrics on MoS2.24 The O2 plasma duration for the HfOx process is 8 s in each deposition cycle, whereas for the AlOx it is 2 s (see the Supporting Information for the details of each process, Sections S.2.2 and S.2.3). The shorter plasma exposure time during the PE-ALD of AlOx can partly explain the lower Mo6+ content (Table S2) compared with what is obtained from the PE-ALD of HfOx on MoS2. The reader should note that for the PE-ALD of AlOx and HfOx films, standard recipes (which had been developed earlier) were simply used. This clarifies why processing conditions (e.g., O2 plasma duration) are different in these two processes.

The second point to highlight is that because H2O does not react strongly with MoS2, there is most likely a nucleation delay during the early ALD cycles of AlOx. Here, it is noted that all the dielectric layer thicknesses, as referred to in this study, were determined on control samples of SiO2/Si. The nucleation delay of ALD AlOx on MoS2 could lead to a thickness deviation between what is deposited on MoS2 and that on SiO2/Si during the early cycles of the deposition.

Finally, for both ALD and PE-ALD processes, carbon impurities are incorporated into the dielectric film because of the low growth temperature of 100 °C and subsequently the incomplete ALD reactions.59

3.2.3. Linking XPS Results to I–V Characterization

After these extensive XPS analyses, it becomes clear that the AlOx films, processed by both the ALD and PE-ALD methods, contain a measurable amount of C–O and C(=O)–OH (carboxyl) species. The presence of these carbon-related compounds can be a plausible explanation for the observed n-type device performance during the I–V measurements.47 One may also wonder about the role of MoOx, which is known as a hole dopant for MoS2. It is worth pointing out that the detected concentration of MoOx after both the ALD and PE-ALD AlOx processes at 100 °C is not so significant. The Mo6+/Mo4+ ratios (see Table S2) are only 0.07 and 0.11 for the ALD and PE-ALD AlOx cases, respectively. This is while the Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio is 0.52 for the reference case (HfOx-capped MoS2 FETs). Therefore, a substantial hole transfer into the MoS2Ev is less likely.

To summarize, although our ALD/PE-ALD AlOx films are oxygen-rich, the MoS2 FETs capped with these dielectrics still show n-type performance, which can be the result of carbon impurities incorporated into the AlOx films when deposited at low temperatures. Furthermore, the devices capped with PE-ALD AlOx exhibit the most optimal characteristics, as they show higher ION/IOFF and lower IOFF among the three studied cases. They also perform better than the ones capped with the ALD AlOx in the ON-state regime, mostly due to the generally higher dielectric constant of PE-ALD AlOx than the ALD counterpart.

3.3. AlOx/HfOx Bilayer Capping

In conventional FETs, the growth of high-κ bilayers (AlOx with HfOx or ZrOx) is one strategy to increase the total gate dielectric capacitance and to further scale down the dielectric thickness without diminishing the gate electrostatic control over the channel.66−68 The complementary features of AlOx and HfOx (or ZrOx) (e.g., their dielectric constant, Eg, etc.)69 make their bilayer stacks suitable options for gate dielectrics. As far as the MoS2 FETs are considered, in addition to the increased gate electrostatic control,26 the bilayer approach can better screen the CI scattering in MoS2.34 Therefore, it is expected that the employment of dielectric bilayers further improves the MoS2 device metrics. To verify this, stacks of AlOx and HfOx were examined on our fabricated devices. The AlOx interlayer was grown by both ALD and PE-ALD methods and the HfOx by PE-ALD, all at 100 °C. The deposition conditions were kept similar to those when these films were grown individually on the MoS2 FETs. The entire stack thickness was also retained at 30 nm while different thickness combinations were investigated.

3.3.1. 2.5/27.5 nm of AlOx/HfOx

I–V Characterization of 2.5/27.5 nm AlOx/HfOx Bilayer Stack

Figure 5 shows the transfer characteristics of the MoS2 FETs in semilog scale, capped with 2.5/27.5 nm of AlOx/HfOx, where the AlOx interlayer is grown by both ALD and PE-ALD. For the transfer curves in linear scale, see Figure S6. Compared with the reference, when the bilayer approach is followed, VT shifts more positively (from ∼40 to ∼70 V, in forward sweep), and IOFF reduces. These observations indicate that upon the growth of bilayer stacks with the oxygen-rich AlOx interlayer, MoS2 is n-type doped to a lesser extent as compared to the reference. However, ION slightly improves, which can primarily be attributed to the more effective screening of MoS2 CIs (as scattering centers) when bilayer stacks are employed.34 In fact, the total dielectric constant of a bilayer stack can be higher than that of a single layer, as verified in previous studies where AlOx/HfOx stack resulted in higher dielectric constant than HfOx.69,70

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Transfer curves (in semilog scale) of the MoS2 FETs capped with bilayers of AlOx and HfOx (where AlOx is grown by both ALD and PE-ALD processes).

The average statistical data for both the ON- and OFF-states of these devices also show similar trends (Figure S6).

XPS Analysis of 2.5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx Bilayer Stack

To evaluate the chemical states at the bilayer high-κ/MoS2 interface, thin bilayers must be used. The average XPS depth of analysis (using Al Kα radiation source (hv = 1486.6 eV)) is limited to the upper ∼10 nm of a stack. Sputter depth profiling to access a deeper lying interface is also not a preferred option because of the potential reduction of oxidic states upon the sputtering process. Therefore, the XPS analysis is performed on only 2.5/2.5 nm thick ALD AlOx/PE-ALD HfOx stacks grown on the MoS2 films.

Figure 6 illustrates the Mo 3d core level spectra of the studied cases. The S 2p and C 1s spectra are also provided in Figure S7. The data are compared to those of the ∼5 nm HfOx deposited on MoS2. As can be seen from the plot, after the growth of both bilayer stacks, the Mo 3d major peak intensities do not drop as dramatically as upon the pure HfOx growth, inferring that less dielectric (than expected) is grown on MoS2 with the bilayer approach. This is also evidenced from the higher intensity of the Si 2p spectrum for the bilayer cases (especially the ALD AlOx) than for the HfOx counterpart (see Figure S7). As mentioned earlier, a nucleation delay likely occurs upon the growth of AlOx films on MoS2 and during the initial deposition cycles, as H2O and O2 plasma used in the ALD and PE-ALD processes of AlOx do not react so strongly with MoS2 (compared with the O2 plasma in the HfOx process). This is the major cause of the higher Mo4+ peak intensity for the AlOx/HfOx stack cases than for the single layer HfOx counterpart.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Mo 3d core level spectra after the growth of 2.5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx films on MoS2 as compared with 5 nm pure HfOx on MoS2.

The AlOx and HfOx process specifications are provided in Section S.2 of the Supporting Information for further clarifications.

Furthermore, the Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio for the HfOx and the bilayer cases with ALD and PE-ALD AlOx interlayers are 0.52, 0.32, and 0.31, respectively (see Table S3). In other words, a portion of the MoS2 surface is oxidized upon the 2.5/2.5 nm bilayer growth and irrespective of the AlOx processing method. This is unlike the growth of 5 nm single layer ALD and PE-ALD AlOx on MoS2, where the Mo6+/Mo4+ is only 0.07, 0.11 (pointed out previously in Table S2). Therefore, one can speculate that the 2.5 nm AlOx is most likely not a closed layer, such that the HfOx process can still significantly oxidize the MoS2 underneath (but evidently less than when only pure HfOx is employed).

STEM Analysis of the Dielectric Growth on MoS2

To further elucidate the dielectric coverage on MoS2, the growth and microstructure of the high-κ/MoS2 stacks are evaluated by using top-view STEM imaging as well as EDX mapping analyses. Initially, the deposition of merely AlOx films on MoS2 is discussed. Then, a study of the bilayers is provided.

Figure 7a shows the high angle annular dark field (HAADF) mode STEM image of 2.5 nm ALD AlOx on MoS2 as well as the EDX elemental mapping of Al and Mo and the color-coded overlays, respectively. As can be seen from the HAADF-STEM image, the MoS2 films are polycrystalline with a grain size of on average ∼70 nm.55 The GBs on MoS2 are known to be more reactive than the basal planes, as they are composed of defects that are arranged linearly. Therefore, AlOx tends to nucleate predominantly at the GBs rather than on the basal planes, as evidenced from the mapping. This leads to a discontinuous layer of ALD AlOx on MoS2 after ∼2.5 nm of growth, which has also been observed previously.53,54Figure 7b displays the EDX overlay mapping of ∼2.5 nm PE-ALD AlOx on MoS2. Overall, the nucleation density of PE-ALD AlOx on MoS2 is more than when it is grown by ALD on MoS2. This is mainly attributed to the use of O2 plasma during the PE-ALD process and its reactive components that promote the precursor chemical adsorption on both the MoS2 GBs and its basal planes. However, a completely closed layer of AlOx is not yet achieved, even with the use of PE-ALD.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) HAADF-STEM image of 2.5 nm ALD AlOx on MoS2 as well as the EDX elemental mappings of the Al, Mo, and their overlay image. (b) HAADF-STEM image of 2.5 nm PE-ALD AlOx on MoS2 as well as the EDX elemental mappings of the Al, Mo, and their overlay image. (c) HAADF-STEM of 2.5/2.5 nm ALD AlOx/PE-ALD HfOx on MoS2 as well as the EDX elemental mappings of Hf, Al, and Mo.

After realizing that 2.5 nm of AlOx with neither of the deposition methods results in a closed layer of AlOx on MoS2, we evaluated the bilayer high-κ growth on MoS2. Figure 7c provides the STEM-HAADF image of a 2.5/2.5 nm thick AlOx/HfOx stack on MoS2 as well as the elemental mappings of Hf, Al, and Mo. Here, the AlOx interlayer has only been grown by the ALD method (and HfOx by the PE-ALD). As can be seen, although the AlOx interlayer mostly decorates the MoS2 GBs, HfOx is homogeneously deposited almost everywhere. Higher resolution HAADF-STEM images are also provided in Figure S8 for further visualization. The closed nature of the HfOx layer on MoS2 strongly implies that the XPS results obtained from the 2.5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx stack are also representatives for stacks with thicker HfOx overlayers (e.g., 27.5 nm), which were used for capping the MoS2 FETs.

Linking All the Characterizations

When correlating the STEM images and the EDX mapping analysis jointly with the XPS measurements, one can comprehend that a 2.5 nm AlOx interlayer (grown by ALD or PE-ALD) is not sufficient for attaining a closed AlOx dielectric film on MoS2. Therefore, when the bilayer approach is followed, HfOx can still reach the underlying MoS2 and react with the MoS2 surface. This explains the increase in the Mo6+ content upon the growth of both bilayer cases on MoS2 (compared with when only single layers of AlOx are grown).

However, the intensity of the Mo6+ chemical state for the bilayer cases is not higher than what is detected for the pure HfOx case. The Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio for the bilayer cases is ∼0.3 and 0.5 for the HfOx case (Table S3). In other words, for bilayer cases, the concentration of MoOx on the MoS2 surface is less than that for the pure HfOx case. In such a situation, one would expect a relative increase in the n-type doping of the devices capped with AlOx/HfOx stacks, since MoOx is known as a hole dopant for MoS2, and its reduced concentration denotes less p-type doping of the devices. However, the reverse behavior is observed. VT shifts positively, and IOFF reduces, as compared with the reference device (Figure 5a,b). This implies a relative n-type doping reduction (relative p-type doping increase) upon capping the MoS2 FETs with dielectric bilayers. As previously pointed out, our AlOx films are oxygen-rich (grown with both ALD and PE-ALD processes). Furthermore, it has been shown that the excess oxygen states of the AlOx are energetically located in the vicinity of MoS2Ev and can dope the MoS2 to p-type.7,44 This could be a plausible explanation for relatively lower n-type doping (relatively higher p-type doping) of our devices, despite the lower concentration of MoOx on MoS2 upon the growth of bilayers.

3.3.2. 5/25 nm AlOx/HfOx

The next logic step is to increase the AlOx interlayer thickness to 5 nm while maintaining the entire stack thickness at 30 nm.

I–V Characterization of the 5/25 nm AlOx/HfOx Bilayer Stack

Figures 8a and 8b compare the transfer characteristics of the MoS2 FETs capped with 5/25 nm of bilayers with the reference, on linear and semilog scales. As can be seen, the growth of the 5 nm AlOx interlayer shifts VT to more positive voltages and reduces IOFF, relative to the reference, again implying that the underlying MoS2 has become less n-type doped. The approximate VT values are marked by straight lines in Figure 8a. Upon the ALD growth of a 5 nm AlOx interlayer, ION improves more than 2-fold and reaches 1.2 μA/μm. In addition, the maximum μFE increases to 0.1 cm2/(V·s) on average. IOFF halves and the ION/IOFF ratio becomes the highest (∼250) for the ALD AlOx interlayer case, as provided in Figure 8c–e and statistically. The ON-state enhancement is most likely the result of a higher dielectric constant for this specific bilayer combination,69,70 such that the MoS2 CIs can be more effectively screened. This leads to the best achieved electrical performance to date for our ALD-based MoS2 FETs. Considering the PE-ALD AlOx/HfOx case, although IOFF is the lowest, ION improves only slightly (see Figure S9), causing the maximum μFE only as high as 0.04 cm2/(V·s) and the ION/IOFF ratio of ∼150 (Figures 8c and 8e, respectively). For elucidating these observations, the chemistry involved at the high-κ/MoS2 interface is again investigated by using XPS.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Transfer curves of the fabricated MoS2 FETs, capped with bilayers of 5/25 nm AlOx/HfOx in (a) linear and (b) semilog scales. The straight lines in (a) and their interception with the horizontal axis correspond to the approximate values of VT (c–e) are the average statistical data of the maximum μFE, IOFF, and ION/IOFF, respectively.

XPS Analysis of the 5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx Bilayer Stack

The XPS analysis is performed after the growth of ∼5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx combinations on bare MoS2 films. As can be seen in Figure 9, upon the growth of these bilayer stacks, the Mo 3d major peaks do not drop as notably when the pure PE-ALD HfOx is grown. As discussed before, unlike the PE-ALD of HfOx, our AlOx films experience a nucleation delay on MoS2 during the initial deposition cycles of both ALD and PE-ALD processes. This results in some deviations between the expected and actual AlOx thicknesses on MoS2, subsequently leading to a lower drop in the intensity of Mo4+ doublet peaks. Evaluating the substrate Si 2p core level spectrum (provided in Figure S10) also confirms that less AlOx is grown on MoS2, as compared with the case of HfOx. In fact, when a thicker dielectric is grown on MoS2, the Si 2p peak intensity fades out due to the limitations in the XPS average depth of analysis. The total counts per second (CPS) area under the Mo4+ and Mo6+ doublet peaks are evaluated as well (see Table S4 for further details). For the pure HfOx case, the Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio is 0.75, whereas for both bilayer cases, it does not exceed 0.22, suggesting that the addition of a 5 nm AlOx interlayer better protects the MoS2 surface from being oxidized upon the HfOx deposition. Here, it is remembered that the Mo6+/Mo4+ ratio is ∼0.3 when a 2.5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx stack is grown on MoS2 (Table S3).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Mo 3d spectra after the growth of 7.5 nm HfOx (PE-ALD) and 5/2.5 nm AlOx/HfOx where the interlayer is grown by both the ALD and PE-ALD methods.

Linking XPS Data to I–V

Linking the XPS analyses to the I–V measurements, similar trends can be observed as to when 2.5/2.5 nm bilayer stacks are grown on MoS2. Again, the Mo6+/Mo4+ ratios for the bilayer cases are less than that of HfOx (evidenced in the XPS), implying that the MoS2 surface is less oxidized to MoOx. Therefore, the observed VT positive shift and the IOFF reduction in the devices capped with 5/25 nm bilayer dielectrics (relative to the reference) cannot be attributed to the hole injection from the MoOx, and they are mainly due to the oxygen-rich states of AlOx that reside in close proximity of the MoS2Ev.

3.3.3. 10/20 nm AlOx/HfOx

It is also worth evaluating the 10/20 nm dielectric stack on the fabricated MoS2 FETs. Figure 10a shows the transfer curves of the devices capped with the ALD AlOx/PE-ALD HfOx of 2.5/27.5, 5/25, and 10/20 nm combinations and the reference. Here, we only tried the ALD of AlOx (and not the PE-ALD of AlOx) as we deduced that the ALD of AlOx best protects the MoS2 surface from being oxidized to MoOx. As can be seen from Figure 10a, by raising the AlOx interlayer thickness to 10 nm, ION improves nearly 1 order of magnitude and reaches 4.7 μA/μm, as compared with the reference. A similar trend can also be observed for the mean maximum μFE, which is shown in Figure 10b. The statistical data for other device metrics are also provided in Figure S11. Despite the improvements in the device ON-state performance, VT shifts negatively, and IOFF degrades dramatically for the 10/20 nm bilayer case, implying that our devices become degenerately n-type doped upon the growth of 10/20 nm dielectric stack. As a result of this excess n-type doping, the back-gate bias fails to properly deplete the channel in the OFF-state regime. This suggests that when a 10/20 nm dielectric stack is grown on the MoS2 FETs, a surface channel is formed.31 In fact, only the topmost layers of the MoS2 are electrically active, which leads to a weak back-gate electrostatic control over the channel.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

(a) Transfer curves of the fabricated MoS2 FETs capped with bilayer dielectrics of different AlOx interlayer thicknesses. The AlOx interlayer is grown by ALD. (b) Mean maximum μFE and its dependence on the AlOx interlayer thickness.

From the material point of view, growing 10 nm of the ALD AlOx interlayer uniformly covers the underlying MoS2. This is shown in the STEM top view images provided in Figure S12.

Stability and Repeatability of the Optimal Devices

Based on the above discussions, among all the studied cases, the optimal device performance is obtained when 5/25 nm of ALD AlOx/PE-ALD HfOx is grown on the fabricated MoS2 FETs. It is also worthwhile evaluating the stability and repeatability of the data obtained from such devices. Figure 11a compares the I–V performance of the same device after eight months of being initially measured. As evidenced, the device metrics are persistent over a long period of time, indicating a high degree of device stability when capped with such a dielectric stack. The I–V performance of a device fabricated few months after, on another wafer and with similar processing conditions is also shown in Figure 11b. The data verify that the obtained results for devices capped with bilayers of such a thickness combination (5/25 nm) are repeatable.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

(a) Initial transfer characteristics of a fabricated MoS2 FET, capped with 5/25 nm of ALD AlOx/PE-ALD HfOx dielectrics, and after eight months of being remeasured. (b) Transfer characteristics of two devices made with same processing conditions on two different wafers.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, this work extensively investigates the integration of high-κ dielectrics with ALD-based MoS2 FETs by means of electrical, surface-chemical, and material characterization techniques.

The electrical characterization data show that the employment of high-κ dielectrics improves the overall device metrics in ALD-based MoS2 FETs. While other studies have associated such improvements mainly with the effective screening of MoS2 charged impurities (CIs) by a high-κ dielectric as well as the dielectric doping effect, we show that three additional parameters related to the processing of the dielectrics can simultaneously govern the MoS2 FET electrical performance and control its doping. These are the stoichiometry of the dielectrics, the carbon impurity content in the dielectrics, and the oxidation degree of the MoS2 top surface upon the dielectric growth.

Despite the fact that our AlOx films are oxygen-rich, which typically leads to p-type doping in MoS2 FETs, an overall n-type performance is observed in the devices capped with these dielectrics. Surface chemical analysis reveals that carbon-related species are incorporated into the AlOx films when grown at 100 °C, being one plausible explanation of the overall observed n-type characteristics in MoS2 FETs capped with oxygen-rich AlOx. Among the single layer dielectrics studied, the PE-ALD AlOx films exhibit the most optimal device electrical performance, as the resulting devices exhibit a high ON-state current while maintaining low OFF-state characteristics.

Surface-chemical analyses further show that the PE-ALD of HfOx and AlOx dielectrics oxidize the MoS2 surface to MoOx, whereas the (thermal) ALD AlOx leaves the underlying MoS2 surface almost intact. Therefore, if a layer of (thermal) ALD AlOx is employed between MoS2 and PE-ALD HfOx, device metrics improve further. Among the bilayer cases, the 5/25 nm (thermal) ALD AlOx/PE-ALD HfOx dielectric stack leads to the most optimal device electrical characteristics. We relate this to the overall higher dielectric constant of the bilayer stack as well as a fair protection of the MoS2 surface against oxidation upon the growth of HfOx. The MoS2 FETs capped with this bilayer combination also show a high degree of stability over time with repeatable results.

Our findings and the connections we make between the surface-chemical, material, and electrical analyses provide guidelines to further optimize and improve the properties of synthetic-based MoS2 FETs of polycrystalline MoS2 nature.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the grant Agreement No. 648787-ALDof2DTMDs. The authors acknowledge the NanoLab TU/e for the cleanroom facilities and the technical support of E. J. Geluk, E. Smalbrugge, T. de Vries, C. V. Helvoirt, M. G. Dijstelbloem, J. V. Gerwen, P. P. P. Bax, W. M. Dijkstra, J. J. A. Zeebregts, and Y. Lei. Further, Dr. R.M. expresses her gratitude to Dr. A. A. Sagade, E. J. Geluk, Dr. T. Faraz, Dr. G. V. Straaten, Dr. V. Vandalon, Dr. A. Sharma, A. Bracesco, and J. J. P. M. Schulpen for the useful scientific and practical discussions, the Molecular Materials and Nanosystems (M2N) research group for supplying resources to conduct the electrical measurements, and the Advanced Nanomaterials and Devices (AND) group for providing access to their glovebox sample storage. Finally, Solliance and the Dutch province of Noord Brabant are acknowledged for funding the TEM facility.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.4c02214.

  • MoS2 FET optical microscopy top-view and cross-sectional schematics; process specifications for ALD and PE-ALD of AlOx and HfOx; HfOx capping layer on MoS2 (XPS and Raman data analyses); AlOx capping layer on MoS2 (MoS2 FET device metrics and XPS data analysis); bilayer AlOx/HfOx capping layer on MoS2 (MoS2 FET device metrics, XPS analyses, HR-STEM images); references (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

an4c02214_si_001.pdf (715.7KB, pdf)

References

  1. Alam K.; Lake R. K. Monolayer MoS2 Transistors beyond the Technology Road Map. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59 (12), 3250–3254. 10.1109/TED.2012.2218283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akinwande D.; Huyghebaert C.; Wang C.-H.; Serna M. I.; Goossens S.; Li L.-J.; Wong H.-S. P.; Koppens F. H. L. Graphene and Two-Dimensional Materials for Silicon Technology. Nature 2019, 573 (7775), 507–518. 10.1038/s41586-019-1573-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Afzalian A. Ab Initio Perspective of Ultra-Scaled CMOS from 2D-Material Fundamentals to Dynamically Doped Transistors. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2021, 5 (1), 5. 10.1038/s41699-020-00181-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cao W.; Kang J.; Sarkar D.; Liu W.; Banerjee K. 2D Semiconductor FETs—Projections and Design for Sub-10 Nm VLSI. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62 (11), 3459–3469. 10.1109/TED.2015.2443039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asselberghs I.; Smets Q.; Schram T.; Groven B.; Verreck D.; Afzalian A.; Arutchelvan G.; Gaur A.; Cott D.; Maurice T.; Brems S.; Kennes K.; Phommahaxay A.; Dupuy E.; Radisic D.; de Marneffe J.-F.; Thiam A.; Li W.; Devriendt K.; Huyghebaert C.; Lin D.; Caymax M.; Morin P.; Radu I. P.. Wafer-Scale Integration of Double Gated WS2 -Transistors in 300mm Si CMOS Fab. In 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM); IEEE: 2021; pp 40.2.1–40.2.4. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arutchelvan G.; Smets Q.; Verreck D.; Ahmed Z.; Gaur A.; Sutar S.; Jussot J.; Groven B.; Heyns M.; Lin D.; Asselberghs I.; Radu I. Impact of Device Scaling on the Electrical Properties of MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11 (1), 6610. 10.1038/s41598-021-85968-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McClellan C. J.; Yalon E.; Smithe K. K. H.; Suryavanshi S. V.; Pop E. High Current Density in Monolayer MoS2 Doped by AlOx. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (1), 1587–1596. 10.1021/acsnano.0c09078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu Y.; Guo J.; Wu Y.; Zhu E.; Weiss N. O.; He Q.; Wu H.; Cheng H. C.; Xu Y.; Shakir I.; Huang Y.; Duan X. Pushing the Performance Limit of Sub-100 Nm Molybdenum Disulfide Transistors. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (10), 6337–6342. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen P.-C.; Su C.; Lin Y.; Chou A.-S.; Cheng C.-C.; Park J.-H.; Chiu M.-H.; Lu A.-Y.; Tang H.-L.; Tavakoli M. M.; Pitner G.; Ji X.; Cai Z.; Mao N.; Wang J.; Tung V.; Li J.; Bokor J.; Zettl A.; Wu C.-I.; Palacios T.; Li L.-J.; Kong J. Ultralow Contact Resistance between Semimetal and Monolayer Semiconductors. Nature 2021, 593 (7858), 211–217. 10.1038/s41586-021-03472-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li W.; Zhou J.; Cai S.; Yu Z.; Zhang J.; Fang N.; Li T.; Wu Y.; Chen T.; Xie X.; Ma H.; Yan K.; Dai N.; Wu X.; Zhao H.; Wang Z.; He D.; Pan L.; Shi Y.; Wang P.; Chen W.; Nagashio K.; Duan X.; Wang X. Uniform and Ultrathin High-κ Gate Dielectrics for Two-Dimensional Electronic Devices. Nat. Electron. 2019, 2 (12), 563–571. 10.1038/s41928-019-0334-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolshakov P.; Smyth C. M.; Khosravi A.; Zhao P.; Hurley P. K.; Hinkle C. L.; Wallace R. M.; Young C. D. Contact Engineering for Dual-Gate MoS2 Transistors Using O2 Plasma Exposure. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1 (2), 210–219. 10.1021/acsaelm.8b00059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Radisavljevic B.; Radenovic A.; Brivio J.; Giacometti V.; Kis A. Single-Layer MoS2 Transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6 (3), 147–150. 10.1038/nnano.2010.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leong W. S.; Luo X.; Li Y.; Khoo K. H.; Quek S. Y.; Thong J. T. L. Low Resistance Metal Contacts to MoS 2 Devices with Nickel-Etched-Graphene Electrodes. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (1), 869–877. 10.1021/nn506567r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Illarionov Y. Y.; Smithe K. K. H.; Waltl M.; Knobloch T.; Pop E.; Grasser T. Improved Hysteresis and Reliability of MoS2 Transistors With High-Quality CVD Growth and Al2O3 Encapsulation. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38 (12), 1763–1766. 10.1109/LED.2017.2768602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lanza M.; Smets Q.; Huyghebaert C.; Li L.-J. Yield, Variability, Reliability, and Stability of Two-Dimensional Materials Based Solid-State Electronic Devices. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 5689. 10.1038/s41467-020-19053-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wachter S.; Polyushkin D. K.; Bethge O.; Mueller T. A Microprocessor Based on a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 14948. 10.1038/ncomms14948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robertson J. High Dielectric Constant Oxides. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 28 (3), 265–291. 10.1051/epjap:2004206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Delabie A.; Caymax M.; Brijs B.; Brunco D. P.; Conard T.; Sleeckx E.; Van Elshocht S.; Ragnarsson L.-A.; De Gendt S.; Heyns M. M. Scaling to Sub-1 Nm Equivalent Oxide Thickness with Hafnium Oxide Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153 (8), F180. 10.1149/1.2209568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. George S. M. Atomic Layer Deposition: An Overview. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110 (1), 111–131. 10.1021/cr900056b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu H.; Xu K.; Zhang X.; Ye P. D. The Integration of High-k Dielectric on Two-Dimensional Crystals by Atomic Layer Deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100 (15), 152115. 10.1063/1.3703595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. McDonnell S.; Brennan B.; Azcatl A.; Lu N.; Dong H.; Buie C.; Kim J.; Hinkle C. L.; Kim M. J.; Wallace R. M. HfO2 on MoS2 by Atomic Layer Deposition: Adsorption Mechanisms and Thickness Scalability. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (11), 10354–10361. 10.1021/nn404775u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu H.; Ye P. D. MoS2 Dual-Gate MOSFET with Atomic-Layer-Deposited Al2O3 as Top-Gate Dielectric. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33 (4), 546–548. 10.1109/LED.2012.2184520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Azcatl A.; McDonnell S.; Santosh K. C.; Peng X.; Dong H.; Qin X.; Addou R.; Mordi G. I.; Lu N.; Kim J.; Kim M. J.; Cho K.; Wallace R. M. MoS2 Functionalization for Ultra-Thin Atomic Layer Deposited Dielectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104 (11), 111601. 10.1063/1.4869149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang J.; Kim S.; Choi W.; Park S. H.; Jung Y.; Cho M. H.; Kim H. Improved Growth Behavior of Atomic-Layer-Deposited High- k Dielectrics on Multilayer MoS2 by Oxygen Plasma Pretreatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5 (11), 4739–4744. 10.1021/am303261c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Son S.; Yu S.; Choi M.; Kim D.; Choi C. Improved High Temperature Integration of Al2O3 on MoS2 by Using a Metal Oxide Buffer Layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106 (2), 021601. 10.1063/1.4905634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bolshakov P.; Khosravi A.; Zhao P.; Hurley P. K.; Hinkle C. L.; Wallace R. M.; Young C. D. Dual-Gate MoS 2 Transistors with Sub-10 Nm Top-Gate High-k Dielectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112 (25), 253502. 10.1063/1.5027102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Price K. M.; Schauble K. E.; McGuire F. A.; Farmer D. B.; Franklin A. D. Uniform Growth of Sub-5-Nanometer High-κ Dielectrics on MoS 2 Using Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (27), 23072–23080. 10.1021/acsami.7b00538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chang W. H.; Okada N.; Asai H.; Fukuda K.; Okada M.; Endo T.; Miyata Y.; Irisawa T.. Comparative Study of High-k Dielectric on MoS2 Deposited by Plasma Enhanced ALD. In 2019 Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop, SNW 2019; IEEE: 2019; pp 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu J.; Wen M.; Zhao X.; Liu L.; Song X.; Lai P.-T.; Tang W.-M. Effects of HfO 2 Encapsulation on Electrical Performances of Few-Layered MoS 2 Transistor with ALD HfO 2 as Back-Gate Dielectric. Nanotechnology 2018, 29 (34), 345201. 10.1088/1361-6528/aac853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Illarionov Y. Y.; Knobloch T.; Jech M.; Lanza M.; Akinwande D.; Vexler M. I.; Mueller T.; Lemme M. C.; Fiori G.; Schwierz F.; Grasser T. Insulators for 2D Nanoelectronics: The Gap to Bridge. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 3385. 10.1038/s41467-020-16640-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim S. Y.; Park S.; Choi W. Enhanced Carrier Mobility of Multilayer MoS2 Thin-Film Transistors by Al2O3 Encapsulation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109 (15), 152101. 10.1063/1.4964606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Price K. M.; Najmaei S.; Ekuma C. E.; Burke R. A.; Dubey M.; Franklin A. D. Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of HfO2 on Monolayer, Bilayer, and Trilayer MoS2 for the Integration of High-κ Dielectrics in Two-Dimensional Devices. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2 (7), 4085–4094. 10.1021/acsanm.9b00505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jena D.; Konar A. Enhancement of Carrier Mobility in Semiconductor Nanostructures by Dielectric Engineering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98 (13), 136805. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.136805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ma N.; Jena D. Charge Scattering and Mobility in Atomically Thin Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. X 2014, 4 (1), 1–9. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaasbjerg K.; Thygesen K. S.; Jacobsen K. W. Phonon-Limited Mobility in n-Type Single-Layer MoS 2 from First Principles. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85 (11), 115317. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ghatak S.; Mukherjee S.; Jain M.; Sarma D. D.; Ghosh A.. Microscopic Origin of Charged Impurity Scattering and Flicker Noise in MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors, 2014; pp 1–29.
  37. Zhao P.; Azcatl A.; Bolshakov P.; Moon J.; Hinkle C. L.; Hurley P. K.; Wallace R. M.; Young C. D. Effects of Annealing on Top-Gated MoS2 Transistors with HfO2 Dielectric. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom. 2017, 35 (1), 01A118. 10.1116/1.4974220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jariwala D.; Sangwan V. K.; Late D. J.; Johns J. E.; Dravid V. P.; Marks T. J.; Lauhon L. J.; Hersam M. C. Band-like Transport in High Mobility Unencapsulated Single-Layer MoS2 Transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102 (17), 173107. 10.1063/1.4803920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hurley P. K.; O’Connor É.; Djara V.; Monaghan S.; Povey I. M.; Long R. D.; Sheehan B.; Lin J.; McIntyre P. C.; Brennan B.; Wallace R. M.; Pemble M. E.; Cherkaoui K. The Characterization and Passivation of Fixed Oxide Charges and Interface States in the Al2O3/InGaAs MOS System. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2013, 13 (4), 429–443. 10.1109/TDMR.2013.2282216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shin B.; Weber J. R.; Long R. D.; Hurley P. K.; Van de Walle C. G.; McIntyre P. C. Origin and Passivation of Fixed Charge in Atomic Layer Deposited Aluminum Oxide Gate Insulators on Chemically Treated InGaAs Substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96 (15), 152908. 10.1063/1.3399776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kufer D.; Konstantatos G. Highly Sensitive, Encapsulated MoS2 Photodetector with Gate Controllable Gain and Speed. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (11), 7307–7313. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang X.; Shao Z.; Zhang X.; He Y.; Jie J. Surface Charge Transfer Doping of Low-Dimensional Nanostructures toward High-Performance Nanodevices. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (47), 10409–10442. 10.1002/adma.201601966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Alharbi A.; Shahrjerdi D. Analyzing the Effect of High-k Dielectric-Mediated Doping on Contact Resistance in Top-Gated Monolayer MoS 2 Transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65 (10), 4084–4092. 10.1109/TED.2018.2866772. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Valsaraj A.; Chang J.; Rai A.; Register L. F.; Banerjee S. K. Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Vacancy-Based Doping of Monolayer MoS 2 on Oxide. 2D Mater. 2015, 2 (4), 045009. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/4/045009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rai A.; Valsaraj A.; Movva H. C. P.; Roy A.; Ghosh R.; Sonde S.; Kang S.; Chang J.; Trivedi T.; Dey R.; Guchhait S.; Larentis S.; Register L. F.; Tutuc E.; Banerjee S. K. Air Stable Doping and Intrinsic Mobility Enhancement in Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide by Amorphous Titanium Suboxide Encapsulation. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (7), 4329–4336. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Moody M. J.; Henning A.; Jurca T.; Shang J. Y.; Bergeron H.; Balla I.; Olding J. N.; Weiss E. A.; Hersam M. C.; Lohr T. L.; Marks T. J.; Lauhon L. J. Atomic Layer Deposition of Molybdenum Oxides with Tunable Stoichiometry Enables Controllable Doping of MoS2. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30 (11), 3628–3632. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Leonhardt A.; Chiappe D.; Afanas’ev V. V.; El Kazzi S.; Shlyakhov I.; Conard T.; Franquet A.; Huyghebaert C.; de Gendt S. Material-Selective Doping of 2D TMDC through Al x O y Encapsulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (45), 42697–42707. 10.1021/acsami.9b11550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Smithe K. K. H.; Suryavanshi S. V.; Muñoz Rojo M.; Tedjarati A. D.; Pop E. Low Variability in Synthetic Monolayer MoS2 Devices. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 8456–8463. 10.1021/acsnano.7b04100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Song J.-G.; Park J.; Lee W.; Choi T.; Jung H.; Lee C. W.; Hwang S.-H.; Myoung J. M.; Jung J.-H.; Kim S.-H.; Lansalot-Matras C.; Kim H. Layer-Controlled, Wafer-Scale, and Conformal Synthesis of Tungsten Disulfide Nanosheets Using Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (12), 11333–11340. 10.1021/nn405194e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jeon W.; Cho Y.; Jo S.; Ahn J. H.; Jeong S. J. Wafer-Scale Synthesis of Reliable High-Mobility Molybdenum Disulfide Thin Films via Inhibitor-Utilizing Atomic Layer Deposition. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29 (47), 1–8. 10.1002/adma.201703031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sharma A.; Verheijen M. A.; Wu L.; Karwal S.; Vandalon V.; Knoops H. C. M.; Sundaram R. S.; Hofmann J. P.; Kessels W. M. M.; Bol A. A. Low-Temperature Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of 2-D MoS 2: Large Area, Thickness Control and Tuneable Morphology. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (18), 8615–8627. 10.1039/C8NR02339E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhou W.; Zou X.; Najmaei S.; Liu Z.; Shi Y.; Kong J.; Lou J.; Ajayan P. M.; Yakobson B. I.; Idrobo J.-C. Intrinsic Structural Defects in Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (6), 2615–2622. 10.1021/nl4007479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang H.; Chiappe D.; Meersschaut J.; Conard T.; Franquet A.; Nuytten T.; Mannarino M.; Radu I.; Vandervorst W.; Delabie A. Nucleation and Growth Mechanisms of Al2O3 Atomic Layerdeposition on Synthetic Polycrystalline MoS2. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146 (5), 052810. 10.1063/1.4967406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Oh I.-K.; Kim W.-H.; Zeng L.; Singh J.; Bae D.; Mackus A. J. M.; Song J.-G.; Seo S.; Shong B.; Kim H.; Bent S. F. Synthesis of a Hybrid Nanostructure of ZnO-Decorated MoS 2 by Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 1757–1769. 10.1021/acsnano.9b07467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sharma A.; Mahlouji R.; Wu L.; Verheijen M. A.; Vandalon V.; Balasubramanyam S.; Hofmann J. P.; Kessels W. M. M.; Bol A. A. Large Area, Patterned Growth of 2D MoS2 and Lateral MoS2-WS2 Heterostructures for Nano- and Opto-Electronic Applications. Nanotechnology 2020, 31 (25), 255603. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab7593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vos M. F. J.; Macco B.; Thissen N. F. W.; Bol A. A.; Kessels W. M. M. (Erwin). Atomic Layer Deposition of Molybdenum Oxide from (NtBu)2 (NMe2)2 Mo and O2 Plasma. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. 2016, 34 (1), 01A103. 10.1116/1.4930161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mahlouji R.; Zhang Y.; Verheijen M. A.; Hofmann J. P.; Kessels W. M. M.; Sagade A. A.; Bol A. A. On the Contact Optimization of ALD-Based MoS 2 FETs: Correlation of Processing Conditions and Interface Chemistry with Device Electrical Performance. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3 (7), 3185–3199. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c00379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sharma A.; Longo V.; Verheijen M. A.; Bol A. A.; Kessels W. M. M. (Erwin). Atomic Layer Deposition of HfO2 Using HfCp(NMe2)3 and O2 Plasma. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. 2017, 35 (1), 01B130. 10.1116/1.4972210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. van Hemmen J. L.; Heil S. B. S.; Klootwijk J. H.; Roozeboom F.; Hodson C. J.; van de Sanden M. C. M.; Kessels W. M. M. Plasma and Thermal ALD of Al2O3 in a Commercial 200 Mm ALD Reactor. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 154 (7), G165. 10.1149/1.2737629. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lu A. K. A.; Houssa M.; Radu I. P.; Pourtois G. Toward an Understanding of the Electric Field-Induced Electrostatic Doping in van Der Waals Heterostructures: A First-Principles Study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (8), 7725–7734. 10.1021/acsami.6b14722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kim I. S.; Sangwan V. K.; Jariwala D.; Wood J. D.; Park S.; Chen K.-S.; Shi F.; Ruiz-Zepeda F.; Ponce A.; Jose-Yacaman M.; Dravid V. P.; Marks T. J.; Hersam M. C.; Lauhon L. J. Influence of Stoichiometry on the Optical and Electrical Properties of Chemical Vapor Deposition Derived MoS2. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (10), 10551–10558. 10.1021/nn503988x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Chuang S.; Battaglia C.; Azcatl A.; McDonnell S.; Kang J. S.; Yin X.; Tosun M.; Kapadia R.; Fang H.; Wallace R. M.; Javey A. MoS2 P-Type Transistors and Diodes Enabled by High Work Function MoOx Contacts. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (3), 1337–1342. 10.1021/nl4043505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Profijt H. B.; Potts S. E.; van de Sanden M. C. M.; Kessels W. M. M. Plasma-Assisted Atomic Layer Deposition: Basics, Opportunities, and Challenges. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. 2011, 29 (5), 050801. 10.1116/1.3609974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jinesh K. B.; van Hemmen J. L.; van de Sanden M. C. M.; Roozeboom F.; Klootwijk J. H.; Besling W. F. A.; Kessels W. M. M. Dielectric Properties of Thermal and Plasma-Assisted Atomic Layer Deposited Al2O3 Thin Films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158 (2), G21. 10.1149/1.3517430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Frohlich K.; Micusik M.; Dobrocka E.; Siffalovic P.; Gucmann F.; Fedor J.. Properties of Al2O3 Thin Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition. In The Ninth International Conference on Advanced Semiconductor Devices and Mircosystems; IEEE: 2012; pp 171–174. 10.1109/ASDAM.2012.6418575. [DOI]
  66. Cho M.-H.; Chung K. B.; Chang H. S.; Moon D. W.; Park S. A.; Kim Y. K.; Jeong K.; Whang C. N.; Lee D. W.; Ko D.-H.; Doh S. J.; Lee J. H.; Lee N. I. Interfacial Reaction Depending on the Stack Structure of Al2O3 and HfO2 during Film Growth and Postannealing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85 (18), 4115–4117. 10.1063/1.1807968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Suzuki R.; Taoka N.; Yokoyama M.; Lee S.; Kim S. H.; Hoshii T.; Yasuda T.; Jevasuwan W.; Maeda T.; Ichikawa O.; Fukuhara N.; Hata M.; Takenaka M.; Takagi S. 1-Nm-Capacitance-Equivalent-Thickness HfO2/Al2O3/InGaAs Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structure with Low Interface Trap Density and Low Gate Leakage Current Density. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100 (13), 132906. 10.1063/1.3698095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. O’Mahony A.; Monaghan S.; Provenzano G.; Povey I. M.; Nolan M. G.; O’Connor É.; Cherkaoui K.; Newcomb S. B.; Crupi F.; Hurley P. K.; Pemble M. E. Structural and Electrical Analysis of the Atomic Layer Deposition of HfO2/n-In0.53Ga0.47 As Capacitors with and without an Al2O3 Interface Control Layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97 (5), 052904. 10.1063/1.3473773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kim I.; Koo J.; Lee J.; Jeon H. A Comparison of Al2O3/HfO2 and Al 2O3/ZrO2 Bilayers Deposited by the Atomic Layer Deposition Method for Potential Gate Dielectric Applications. Japanese J. Appl. Physics, Part 1 Regul. Pap. Short Notes Rev. Pap. 2006, 45 (2 A), 919–925. 10.1143/JJAP.45.919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Li X.-F.; Cao Y.-Q.; Li A.-D.; Li H.; Wu D. HfO2/Al2O3/Ge Gate Stacks with Small Capacitance Equivalent Thickness and Low Interface State Density. ECS Solid State Lett. 2012, 1 (2), N10–N12. 10.1149/2.006202ssl. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

an4c02214_si_001.pdf (715.7KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Applied Nano Materials are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES