Skip to main content
JACS Au logoLink to JACS Au
. 2024 May 30;4(8):2853–2861. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00843

Enabling Universal Access to Rapid and Stable Tetrazine Bioorthogonal Probes through Triazolyl-Tetrazine Formation

Haojie Yang , Hongbao Sun , Yinghan Chen , Yayue Wang , Cheng Yang §, Fang Yuan , Xiaoai Wu , Wei Chen , Ping Yin , Yong Liang ‡,*, Haoxing Wu †,§,*
PMCID: PMC11350731  PMID: 39211625

Abstract

graphic file with name au3c00843_0007.jpg

Despite the immense potential of tetrazine bioorthogonal chemistry in biomedical research, the in vivo performance of tetrazine probes is challenged by the inverse correlation between the physiological stability and reactivity of tetrazines. Additionally, the synthesis of functionalized tetrazines is often complex and requires specialized reagents. To overcome these issues, we present a novel tetrazine scaffold—triazolyl-tetrazine—that can be readily synthesized from shelf-stable ethynyl-tetrazines and azides. Triazolyl-tetrazines exhibit improved physiological stability along with high reactivity. We showcase the effectiveness of this approach by creating cell-permeable probes for protein labeling and live cell imaging, as well as efficiently producing 18F-labeled molecular probes for positron emission tomography imaging. By utilizing the readily available pool of functionalized azides, we envisage that this modular approach will provide universal accessibility to tetrazine bioorthogonal tools, facilitating applications in biomedicine and materials science.

Keywords: tetrazine, bioorthogonal chemistry, modular synthesis, click chemistry, imaging

Introduction

Bioorthogonal chemistry,14 a strategy first proposed in 2000,5 has revolutionized various fields, including chemical biology, drug discovery, molecular imaging, and biomaterials. As the applications of bioorthogonal chemistry continue to expand, optimizing the bioorthogonality of reaction tools has become increasingly important. Remaining challenges include optimizing the reactant structure to enhance their stability and prevent degradation in a biological milieu;1 improving the reaction kinetics to facilitate biomedical applications at low concentrations;6,7 developing bioorthogonal “mini-tags” to avoid interfering with normal cellular processes;8 creating bioorthogonal cleavage reactions for selective activation or drug release;914 and designing bioorthogonal fluorogenic probes for in vivo imaging.15

Achieving the optimal balance between stability and rapid reaction kinetics of reactants is crucial for their in vivo performance,1 but it remains highly challenging. The reactants must remain inert to all species in the living system while remaining highly reactive toward their bioorthogonal reaction partners (Figure 1A). Particularly for certain in vivo biomedical applications, the kinetic constants should be greater than 104 M–1 s–1 to enable conjugation at diagnostic or therapeutic concentrations,1,16,17 while the reactants must remain stable after tens of hours in the circulation. The inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder (IEDDA) reaction between tetrazine and trans-cyclooctene (TCO) has been recognized as the most rapid bioorthogonal reaction,18,19 demonstrating successful applications in animal models and clinical transformative potential.14,20,21 Various probes or theranostic agents based on this chemistry have been developed for diverse cutting-edge applications, including super-resolution imaging of biomolecules in live cells, site-specific protein multimodification or function regulation, on-demand prodrug release, and pretargeted nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy.13,17,2226 However, the inverse correlation between the stability and reactivity of these reactants greatly limits their bioorthogonal performance in living systems and clinic translation.1,16

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) General principle of utilizing bioorthogonal reporters for in vivo bioconjugation. (B) Previous tetrazine skeletons and their advantages and limitations. (C) Our design strategy for universal access to rapid and stable bioorthogonal probes.

It has long been recognized that electron deficiency accelerates the IEDDA reaction but can also lead to loss of stability1,16,27 (Figure 1B). For instance, while monosubstituted tetrazine and pyridyl-tetrazine react extremely rapidly with dienophiles, they degrade relatively quickly in the cellular environment. In contrast, alkyl- and phenyl-substituted tetrazines are usually more stable and easier to functionalize, but their relative sluggish in vivo reactivity makes them poorly suited for detecting low-abundance targets. The only exception is the vinylether tetrazines, which were reported recently by the Fox group and which exhibited rapid kinetics bearing an electron-donating substituent (Figure 1B).28 Subsequent mechanistic studies by Mikula et al. revealed that intramolecular repulsion also plays a key role in the IEDDA reaction kinetics in this system.29 These findings suggest that rational design could be utilized to optimize the stability and reactivity of tetrazines.

Another long-standing issue in tetrazine bioorthogonal chemistry is the accessibility of functionalized tetrazine probes. While several de novo synthetic methodologies3032 or postmodification cross-coupling strategies28,3336 have recently been developed to generate unsymmetrical functionalized tetrazines, all of these synthetic approaches require extensive synthetic skills or restricted materials, which hampers their use in many biochemical and biomedical research centers.

To address these challenges, this study aims to develop a new molecular design strategy for stable and reactive tetrazines with comprehensive functional group accessibility. Our approach involves the use of a triazolyl-tetrazine scaffold, which we believe will provide an ideal novel skeleton (Figure 1C). The intramolecular electron-pair repulsion between nitrogen atoms on the triazolyl and tetrazine is expected to promote bioorthogonal kinetics. Additionally, the 1,4-triazole substituent is a weak inductively electron-withdrawing group37 that can enhance the physiological stability of the tetrazine, as compared to pyridyl- or monosubstituted tetrazines. Therefore, we also hypothesize that the modular synthesis of triazolyl-tetrazine can be achieved through a copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne click reaction (CuAAC) using ethynyl-tetrazine precursors. We anticipate that this strategy will be straightforward to implement and given the wide variety of commercially available functionalized azides, will lead to the creation of a versatile range of tetrazine bioorthogonal probes.

Results and Discussion

To test our hypotheses, our first goal was to develop a simple methodology for preparing ethynyl-tetrazine since only a few reports exist describing alkynyl-tetrazines38,39 and ethynyl-tetrazines are unknown. To achieve this, we focused on a recently developed 3-methylthiotetrazine28 that can be prepared from corresponding carboxylic esters in two steps with wide functionality tolerance. This approach allows us to avoid the use of restrictive reagents such as anhydrous hydrazine. We envisaged that this versatile precursor could be used for preparing ethynyl-tetrazine through a Liebeskind–Srogl reaction. Our initial attempt involved reacting 3-(methylthio)-6-phenyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazine (1) as the model substrate and tributyl(trimethylsilylethynyl)stannane as the nucleophile, using palladium-catalysis conditions with copper iodide. We obtained the desired TMS-protected ethynyl-tetrazine product in a moderate yield of 52% (Supporting Information, Table S1). After exploring different catalysts, copper additives, and temperatures, we discovered the best reaction conditions involved 0.2 equiv of PdCl2(PPh3)2 as catalyst and 2.0 equiv of CuI, resulting in a 91% product yield and 83% on a gram scale (Supporting Information, Table S1). After flash column purification and deprotection of the TMS group under slightly alkaline conditions, ethynyl-tetrazine 2a was produced in 70% overall yield (Scheme 1). We obtained 2a as a red crystalline solid, and it remained stable for at least 150 days at 4 °C (Supporting Information, Figure S1).

Scheme 1. Preparation of Ethynyl-Tetrazines and Substrate Scope.

Scheme 1

Yields of isolated products are based on 1. Reactions were conducted under standard conditions on a 0.2 mmol scale, unless otherwise noted.

5 mmol scale.

80 °C, 2 h for the coupling step.

This synthetic approach was determined to have a wide substrate scope (Scheme 1). We successfully generated an array of ethynyl-tetrazines (2b2i) bearing different functionalized phenyl groups or heterocycles at the 3-position in two-step isolated yields of 48–73%. We also obtained alkyl-substituted ethynyl-tetrazines bearing ether, ester, amide, or amino acid “handles” in yields of 29–51% (2j2m).

Encouraged by the aforementioned results, efforts shifted toward utilizing click chemistry with these ethynyl-tetrazines to generate tetrazines for use as biomedical probes (Scheme 2). We obtained desired triazole product 3a in an isolated yield of 97% by reacting 2a with a simple azide, ethyl azidoacetate, under well-established CuAAC conditions.40,41 We adjusted the hydrophilicity of the tetrazines through PEGylation with functional handles (3b3g) and obtained the tetrazine dimer 3i with a disulfide linkage in good yield so that it could be applied for the development of cleavable materials. We also added different functional handles to tetrazine to generate molecular probes, such as a photoreactive diazirine (3h), an ammonium salt (3j), a fluorophore with an ester (3l), biotin (3m), and α-lipoic acid (3n).

Scheme 2. Modular Access of Triazolyl-Tetrazine Probes with Biomedical Functionalities.

Scheme 2

Reaction times and isolated yields are shown under each product. The predicted octanol/water partition coefficient (log P) was calculated using the software Molinspiration property calculator.

0.5 equiv of azide was used.

To ensure the safety of the synthesized triazolyl-tetrazines during laboratory operations, we conducted a differential scanning calorimetry experiment to investigate the thermal behavior of compounds 3a and 3h, both of which are relatively nitrogen-rich among the compounds we have developed. To our satisfaction, we observed slow thermal decomposition, supported by a gradual exothermic decomposition process lasting over 5 min (Supporting Information, Figure S24). This suggests the excellent safety of triazolyl-tetrazines.42,43

Having developed various functionalized triazolyl-tetrazines, we aimed to assess the bioorthogonal performance of the triazolyl-tetrazines in terms of their stability and reaction kinetics. For our reference compound, we used compound 3b, which features a commonly used benzoic acid functional group. We then compared it against tetrazines in which the triazolyl group was replaced with hydrogen, methyl, phenyl, or pyridyl while maintaining the same benzoic acid substituents at the 6-position (Figure 2A). We incubated the five compounds at 37 °C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to determine their stability. We observed rapid loss of absorption of the tetrazine chromophore by liquid chromatography (LC)–mass spectrometry in the case of pyridyl- (Py-Tz) or H-tetrazine (H-Tz), with less than 13% of the compounds remaining after 48 h (Figure 2B). Conversely, 3b and methyl-tetrazine (Me-Tz) showed much greater stability, with more than 92% of the starting compounds still present after 12 h and at least 63% present after 48 h. Similar results were obtained when we incubated the compounds in pure FBS (Supporting Information, Table S3 and Figure S12). Our findings indicated that the triazolyl-tetrazines exhibit good stability under physiological conditions against metabolic decomposition, even after prolonged incubation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of stability and reactivity of triazolyl-tetrazine 3b with other tetrazines. (A) Structures of the tetrazines and TCOs in this stability and reactivity study. (B) The stability of the tetrazines was evaluated in DMEM containing 10% FBS at 37 °C. (C) Second-order rate constants for the reactions of H-Tz-A,443b, Py-Tz, Me-Tz, and Ph-Tz with 4a-TCO in PBS at 37 °C. (D) Correlation between the metabolic stability (residual fraction after 24 h incubation in DMEM) and reactivity of tetrazines. (E) Second-order rate constant for the reaction of 3b with d-TCO in PBS at 23 °C.

To effectively function as bioorthogonal probes, tetrazines must possess sufficient stability to persist in the body for a certain period, while also displaying sufficient reactivity to rapidly and completely undergo the desired chemistry in vivo. We determined the second-order rate constant for the reactions between different tetrazines and axial-TCO (4a-TCO). The rate constant for 3b was determined as 10332 M–1 s–1, which is slower than that for pyridyl-tetrazine (Py-Tz) but still within the same order of magnitude. Moreover, it was at least 6-fold higher than those for phenyl- (Ph-Tz) or methyl-tetrazine (Me-Tz) (Figure 2C). Notably, 3b reacted quite fast for such a stable tetrazine derivative (Figure 2D), confirming our hypothesis that rational design could avoid the compromise between stability and reactivity that has long hampered the biomedical application of tetrazine bioorthogonal chemistry. Furthermore, in the presence of a more reactive but slightly less stable conformationally strained dienophile (cis-dioxolane-fused TCO, d-TCO),21 the rate constant of 3b at ambient temperature was determined as 39406 M–1 s–1 using stopped-flow spectrophotometry (Figure 2E).

To understand the high reactivity and good stability of triazolyl-tetrazines (Ta-Tz), we conducted density functional theory calculations to analyze the superiority of the triazolyl substituent as compared to phenyl and pyridyl substituents (Figure 3). According to the frontier molecular orbital theory, in the IEDDA reaction, a lower lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy of the tetrazine corresponds to a higher reaction rate.16,29,45Py-Tz exhibits the lowest LUMO level (0.46 eV), consistent with its lowest activation free-energy barrier for the cycloaddition of Py-Tz and TCO. However, the comparison between Ta-Tz and Ph-Tz showed that Ta-Tz, possessing a higher vacant orbital energy (0.64 versus 0.56 eV), exhibited greater reactivity than Ph-Tz (14.6 versus 15.0 kcal mol–1) due to intramolecular repulsion (Figure 3A,B).29 To reveal the origin of the observed reactivity, we performed distortion/interaction analysis4648 on three transition states involving Ph-Tz, Ta-Tz, and Py-Tz. In this analysis, the activation energy (ΔE) comprises two parts: the distortion energy (ΔEdist) associated with the structural distortion that the reactants must undergo to reach their transition-state geometry and the interaction energy (ΔEint) arising from the approach of increasingly distorted reactants. Although the interaction energies of these three reactions were calculated to be approximately equal, the activation energies for Ta-Tz and Py-Tz were much lower than that in the case of Ph-Tz, which can be attributed to their reduced distortion energies (Figure 3C). For the most reactive Py-Tz, the total distortion energy is the smallest (ΔEdist = 17.8 kcal mol–1). The ΔEdist for Ta-Tz is 19.0 kcal mol–1, which is lower by 1.7 kcal mol–1 than that for Ph-TzEdist = 20.7 kcal mol–1). This finding agrees with the higher reactivity of Ta-Tz than Ph-Tz toward TCO. Recently, the Mikula group29 explained the high reactivity of Py-Tz by the intramolecular repulsive N–N interaction between its pyridyl and tetrazine moieties. The distinctive performance of Ta-Tz also benefits from the lower distortion energy introduced by the N–N repulsion. As shown in Figure 3B, in the structure of the transition state of the cycloaddition between Ta-Tz and TCO, the labeled dihedral angel is 60°, which is very close to that involving Py-Tz (63°).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Theoretical calculations of three tetrazines. (A) LUMO or LUMO + 1 orbitals and orbital energies of substituted tetrazines were calculated at the HF/6-311+G(d,p)//M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of theory. (B) Computed transition-state geometries and activation free energies (ΔG, kcal mol–1) at the CPCM(water)-M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p)//M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of theory. (C) Distortion/interaction analysis of the reactions (ΔE, kcal mol–1). (D) Energetics of the reduction of tetrazines by methanethiol (ΔG, kcal mol–1).

The instability of tetrazines is usually attributed to two main potential reactions: attack by nucleophiles49 and reduction to 2H-tetrazines.50 As depicted in Figure 3A, the energy of the reacting vacant orbital of Ta-Tz is 0.64 eV, which is the highest among the three tetrazines. This means that Ta-Tz is less likely to be attacked by nucleophiles as compared to Py-Tz. In addition, we calculated the energetics of tetrazines to be reduced by methanethiol. The formation of Py-Tz-2H is the most exergonic (ΔG = −11.2 kcal mol–1), indicating that Py-Tz is the most unstable tetrazine in the presence of biological reductants. According to the computational results, Ta-TzG = −8.9 kcal mol–1) is expected to be more stable than Py-Tz. While the stabilizing N···H hydrogen bond formation is observed in both Ta-Tz-2H and Py-Tz-2H (Figure 3D), the distance is longer (2.36 versus 2.24 Å), and the bond is much weaker in Ta-Tz-2H due to the less basicity of the triazolyl group (the pKa values of protonated triazole and pyridine are 1.17 and 5.23, respectively51). Overall, our calculations explain why the newly designed triazolyl-tetrazines exhibit high reactivity and high stability. Compared to 2-pyridyl, a triazolyl group can also reduce the distortion energy by introducing N–N repulsion, ensuring the high cycloaddition reactivity of tetrazine. However, its weaker electron-withdrawing effect and basicity prevent the tetrazine from being attacked by nucleophiles and reduction to 2H-tetrazines.

To demonstrate the biomedical utility potential of this triazolyl-tetrazine compound, several proof-of-concept experiments were conducted (Figure 4). First, we assessed the feasibility of utilizing triazolyl-tetrazine derivatives for biomolecular modification and bioorthogonal labeling. Compound 3o, which contains a BODIPY fluorophore and an active ester, can be readily attached to bovine serum albumin (BSA), resulting in the formation of an albumin–BODIPY conjugate (BSA-3o). Subsequently, this conjugate underwent bioorthogonal modification with a commercial fluorescent dye, 4e-TCO-Cy5, leading to the dual-labeled conjugate BSA-3o-Cy5 (Figures 4B and Supporting Information, S16).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Synthesis of functionalized triazolyl-tetrazines for diverse applications. aDecay-corrected radiochemical yields are indicated. (B) In-gel fluorescence analysis upon dual labeling of a protein. Gel analysis of BSA or BSA-3o alone or modified with 4e-TCO-Cy5 for 60 min in PBS. The upper panel shows Coomassie staining. (C) Time course imaging using probe 3p (100 nM) in live SKOV3 cells, which are pretreated with d-TCO-TPP. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D) Imaging live SKOV3 cells using tetrazine probes 3p, Me-Tz-BODIPY, and H-Tz-BODIPY. Tetrazines were preincubated in FBS at 37 °C for 15 h before treating cells. Cells were pretargeted by d-TCO-TPP, washed, labeled with tetrazines, and treated with Mito-Tracker Red as a colocalization reference. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E) The HPLC and radio-HPLC chromatograms show probe 3f or 18F-3f before (left) or after (right) reaction with d-TCO following a 2 h incubation in DMEM at 25 °C.

Next, live cell labeling was performed on SKOV3 cells. Upon administering the fluorescent probe 3p to SKOV3 cells pretargeted with d-TCO-triphenylphosphonium conjugates (d-TCO-TPP),52 we visualized a strong and specific fluorescence signal inside live cells within 1 min (Figures 4C and Supporting Information, S17A). The labeling colocalized with the commercial dye Mito-Tracker Red (Supporting Information, Figure S17B). These findings confirmed the cell permeability and bioorthogonal reactivity of triazolyl-tetrazines. Moreover, to investigate the balance between reactivity and stability of triazolyl-tetrazines, we selected two commercially available tetrazine-BODIPY probes, one bearing methyl and the other hydrogen substituents, respectively, as analogues of probe 3p for comparison (see details in Figure S18). We incubated the three probes in FBS at 37 °C for 15 h to mimic the extended circulation and distribution duration of biomacromolecules in vivo. Subsequently, cells pretargeted with d-TCO-TPP were treated with the tetrazine probes and imaged using a confocal microscope. We observed significantly stronger mitochondrial staining within 10 min in cells treated with 3p, with signals 10.3-fold and 2.5-fold higher than those from groups treated with Me-Tz-BODIPY and H-Tz-BODIPY, respectively (Figures 4D; Supporting Information, S18). These results demonstrate that triazolyl-tetrazines can maintain superb bioorthogonal reactivity under long-term physiological challenge conditions.

Finally, we investigated the application of this method to the synthesis of 18F-labeled tetrazines, which exhibit promising potential for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.1,53 We envision that this click strategy could improve the radiolabeling yield by utilizing much easier-to-synthesize 18F-azide precursors. With 18F–N3, ethynyl-tetrazine exhibited excellent radiochemical conversion (up to 95%). The desired 18F-3d was isolated as a single product in 84 ± 5% yield (decay-corrected), which is improved compared with a previous report.44 Its radiochemical purity exceeded 99% in each of five replicates (Figure 4A; Supporting Information, Table S4 and Figure S19). Furthermore, we evaluated the in vitro stability of 18F-3f. This compound was found to remain stable in DMEM containing FBS, retaining its reactivity with d-TCO after a 2 h incubation in this physiological milieu (Figure 4E, Supporting Information, Figure S22).

This modular click strategy also allows for fine-tuning the hydrophilicity of the tetrazine probe, influencing its biodistribution performance and potentially increasing its clinical applicability (Figure 4A; Supporting Information, Tables S4–S6 and Figures S19–S21). Specifically, tracers 18F-3d (predicted log P = 1.26) and 18F-3f (predicted log P = 2.62) were administered to mice for micro-PET/CT imaging (Supporting Information, Figure S23). In comparison with 18F-3f, the less hydrophobic tracer 18F-3d exhibits a more rapid clearance rate from the liver. Radioactivity in the liver gradually transferred to the lower digestive tract and urinary system for 55 min postinjection, with approximately 60% of injected radioactivity accumulating in the urinary system at the end of the scan. The hepatic/renal ratio of 18F-3d decreased from 1.86 at 5 min to 0.26 at 55 min, whereas the corresponding ratio for 18F-3f remained nearly constant around 0.80.

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed an approach for generating triazolyl-tetrazines in a modular and scalable manner from a series of shelf-stable ethynyl-tetrazines. This copper-catalyzed click strategy enables the straightforward creation of versatile functional tetrazine probes in most laboratory settings. The resulting triazolyl-tetrazines exhibit both good stability and high reactivity under physiological conditions, overcoming the challenges of accessibility and compatibility between stability and reactivity faced by existing tetrazine probes. As a proof of their biomedical usefulness, our pilot studies demonstrate the biocompatibility and permeability for live cell labeling. Additionally, this versatile approach can be used to construct radiolabeled bioorthogonal probes with high radiochemical yields, also enabling the fine-tuning of pharmacokinetic properties through structural variation of substituents and functional groups. Our approach is easy to implement and leverages the commercial availability of azides with substantial substrate scope, promising access to diverse tetrazine probes for biomedical research, materials science, and theranostics.

Methods

General Procedure for Ethynyl-Tetrazines

To a mixture of PdCl2(PPh3)2 (28.0 mg, 0.04 mmol, 20 mol %) and CuI (76.2 mg, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) in 1,4-dioxane (2.0 mL) were successively added tetrazine 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and tributyl(trimethylsilylethynyl)stannane (147 μL, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was heated at 50 °C for 12 h. After reaction completion, as monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (PE/EtOAc = 50:1 to 5:1) to afford the corresponding crude product. The crude product was dissolved in MeOH (10 mL), and K2CO3 (2.8 mg, 0.1 equiv) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1–5 min. After reaction completion as monitored by TLC, the reaction was immediately extracted with DCM (3 × 20 mL) and washed with brine. (Caution! Dry solvent is necessary and when the reaction is completed, it needs to be worked up immediately). The combined organic extracts were dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE/EtOAc = 50:1 to 5:1) to afford the corresponding product ethynyl-tetrazines 2.

General Procedure for Triazolyl-Tetrazines

A mixture of CuSO4 (0.1 equiv), tris(3-hydroxypropyltriazolylmethyl)amine (0.1 equiv), and sodium ascorbate (0.2 equiv) in 2 mL of DMF/H2O (4:1) was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. Then, azide (10 mg, 1.0 equiv) and ethynyl-tetrazine 2 (1.0 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature. After reaction completion, as monitored by TLC, the reaction was worked up to afford the corresponding product.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22377083, 22271200, 22077062, and 21801178), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan, China (2023NSFSC1716 and 2023NSFSC0645), and the 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence at West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYYC23003). We thank Feijing Su and Qifeng Liu at the Core Facilities of West China Hospital and Xiaoyan Wang and Yuanming Zhai at the Analytical & Testing Center of Sichuan University for their help with NMR measurements. We thank the High Performance Computing Center (HPCC) of Nanjing University for doing the numerical calculations in this paper on its blade cluster system.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.3c00843.

  • General experimental considerations, synthetic procedures, computational methods, reaction kinetics, compound stability and characterization, and copies of NMR spectra (PDF)

Author Contributions

Haojie Yang, Hongbao Sun, and Yinghan Chen contributed equally. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

au3c00843_si_001.pdf (9.1MB, pdf)

References

  1. Scinto S. L.; Bilodeau D. A.; Hincapie R.; Lee W.; Nguyen S. S.; Xu M.; Am Ende C. W.; Finn M. G.; Lang K.; Lin Q.; Pezacki J. P.; Prescher J. A.; Robillard M. S.; Fox J. M. Bioorthogonal chemistry. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 30. 10.1038/s43586-021-00028-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Devaraj N. K. The Future of Bioorthogonal Chemistry. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 952–959. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertozzi C. R. A decade of bioorthogonal chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 651–653. 10.1021/ar200193f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sletten E. M.; Bertozzi C. R. Bioorthogonal chemistry: fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6974–6998. 10.1002/anie.200900942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Saxon E.; Bertozzi C. R. Cell Surface Engineering by a Modified Staudinger Reaction. Science 2000, 287, 2007–2010. 10.1126/science.287.5460.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nguyen S. S.; Prescher J. A. Developing bioorthogonal probes to span a spectrum of reactivities. Nat. Rev. Chem 2020, 4, 476–489. 10.1038/s41570-020-0205-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Selvaraj R.; Fox J. M. Trans-Cyclooctene—a stable, voracious dienophile for bioorthogonal labeling. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2013, 17, 753–760. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rigolot V.; Biot C.; Lion C. To View Your Biomolecule, Click inside the Cell. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23084–23105. 10.1002/anie.202101502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang J.; Wang X.; Fan X.; Chen P. R. Unleashing the Power of Bond Cleavage Chemistry in Living Systems. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 929–943. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ji X.; Pan Z.; Yu B.; De La Cruz L. K.; Zheng Y.; Ke B.; Wang B. Click and release: bioorthogonal approaches to “on-demand” activation of prodrugs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1077–1094. 10.1039/C8CS00395E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Versteegen R. M.; Rossin R.; ten Hoeve W.; Janssen H. M.; Robillard M. S. Click to Release: Instantaneous Doxorubicin Elimination upon Tetrazine Ligation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14112–14116. 10.1002/anie.201305969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li J.; Chen P. R. Development and application of bond cleavage reactions in bioorthogonal chemistry. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 129–137. 10.1038/nchembio.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Y.; Shen G.; Li J.; Mao W.; Sun H.; Feng P.; Wu H. Bioorthogonal Cleavage of Tetrazine-Caged Ethers and Esters Triggered by trans-Cyclooctene. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 5293–5297. 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peplow M. ‘Clicked’ drugs: researchers prove the remarkable chemistry in humans. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 883–885. 10.1038/s41587-023-01860-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shieh P.; Bertozzi C. R. Design strategies for bioorthogonal smart probes. Org. Bio. Chem. 2014, 12, 9307–9320. 10.1039/C4OB01632G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oliveira B. L.; Guo Z.; Bernardes G. J. L. Inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reactions in chemical biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4895–4950. 10.1039/C7CS00184C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Onzen A. H. A. M.; Versteegen R. M.; Hoeben F. J. M.; Filot I. A. W.; Rossin R.; Zhu T.; Wu J.; Hudson P. J.; Janssen H. M.; ten Hoeve W.; Robillard M. S. Bioorthogonal Tetrazine Carbamate Cleavage by Highly Reactive trans-Cyclooctene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 10955–10963. 10.1021/jacs.0c00531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Blackman M. L.; Royzen M.; Fox J. M. Tetrazine Ligation: Fast Bioconjugation Based on Inverse-Electron-Demand Diels-Alder Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13518–13519. 10.1021/ja8053805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Darko A.; Wallace S.; Dmitrenko O.; Machovina M. M.; Mehl R. A.; Chin J. W.; Fox J. M. Conformationally Strained trans-Cyclooctene with Improved Stability and Excellent Reactivity in Tetrazine Ligation. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3770–3776. 10.1039/C4SC01348D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Srinivasan S.; Yee N. A.; Wu K.; Zakharian M.; Mahmoodi A.; Royzen M.; Oneto J. M. M. SQ3370 Activates Cytotoxic Drug via Click Chemistry at Tumor and Elicits Sustained Responses in Injected and Non-Injected Lesions. Adv. Ther. 2021, 4, 2000243. 10.1002/adtp.202000243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu K.; Yee N. A.; Srinivasan S.; Mahmoodi A.; Zakharian M.; Mejia Oneto J. M.; Royzen M. Click activated protodrugs against cancer increase the therapeutic potential of chemotherapy through local capture and activation. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 1259–1271. 10.1039/d0sc06099b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Werther P.; Yserentant K.; Braun F.; Grußmayer K.; Navikas V.; Yu M.; Zhang Z.; Ziegler M. J.; Mayer C.; Gralak A. J.; Busch M.; Chi W.; Rominger F.; Radenovic A.; Liu X.; Lemke E. A.; Buckup T.; Herten D.-P.; Wombacher R. Bio-orthogonal Red and Far-Red Fluorogenic Probes for Wash-Free Live-Cell and Super-resolution Microscopy. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 1561–1571. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McFarland J. M.; Alečković M.; Coricor G.; Srinivasan S.; Tso M.; Lee J.; Nguyen T.-H.; Mejía Oneto J. M. Click Chemistry Selectively Activates an Auristatin Protodrug with either Intratumoral or Systemic Tumor-Targeting Agents. ACS Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 1400–1408. 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yao Q.; Lin F.; Fan X.; Wang Y.; Liu Y.; Liu Z.; Jiang X.; Chen P. R.; Gao Y. Synergistic enzymatic and bioorthogonal reactions for selective prodrug activation in living systems. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5032. 10.1038/s41467-018-07490-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang Y.; Zhang J.; Han B.; Tan L.; Cai W.; Li Y.; Su Y.; Yu Y.; Wang X.; Duan X.; Wang H.; Shi X.; Wang J.; Yang X.; Liu T. Noncanonical amino acids as doubly bio-orthogonal handles for one-pot preparation of protein multiconjugates. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 974. 10.1038/s41467-023-36658-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. García-Vázquez R.; Battisti U. M.; Jørgensen J. T.; Shalgunov V.; Hvass L.; Stares D. L.; Petersen I. N.; Crestey F.; Löffler A.; Svatunek D.; Kristensen J. L.; Mikula H.; Kjaer A.; Herth M. M. Direct Cu-mediated aromatic 18F-labeling of highly reactive tetrazines for pretargeted bioorthogonal PET imaging. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 11668–11675. 10.1039/D1SC02789A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Clavier G.; Audebert P. s-Tetrazines as Building Blocks for New Functional Molecules and Molecular Materials. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3299–3314. 10.1021/cr900357e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xie Y.; Fang Y.; Huang Z.; Tallon A. M.; am Ende C. W.; Fox J. M. Divergent Synthesis of Monosubstituted and Unsymmetrical 3,6-Disubstituted Tetrazines from Carboxylic Ester Precursors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16967–16973. 10.1002/anie.202005569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Svatunek D.; Wilkovitsch M.; Hartmann L.; Houk K. N.; Mikula H. Uncovering the Key Role of Distortion in Bioorthogonal Tetrazine Tools that Defy the Reactivity/Stability Trade-Off. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8171–8177. 10.1021/jacs.2c01056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang J.; Karver M. R.; Li W.; Sahu S.; Devaraj N. K. Metal-Catalyzed One-Pot Synthesis of Tetrazines Directly from Aliphatic Nitriles and Hydrazine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5222–5225. 10.1002/anie.201201117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mao W.; Shi W.; Li J.; Su D.; Wang X.; Zhang L.; Pan L.; Wu X.; Wu H. Organocatalytic and Scalable Syntheses of Unsymmetrical 1,2,4,5-Tetrazines by Thiol-Containing Promotors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1106–1109. 10.1002/anie.201812550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qu Y.; Sauvage F. X.; Clavier G.; Miomandre F.; Audebert P. Metal-Free Synthetic Approach to 3-Monosubstituted Unsymmetrical 1,2,4,5-Tetrazines Useful for Bioorthogonal Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12057–12061. 10.1002/anie.201804878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wieczorek A.; Werther P.; Euchner J.; Wombacher R. Green- to far-red-emitting Fluorogenic Tetrazine Probes-Synthetic Access and No-wash Protein Imaging inside Living Cells. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1506–1510. 10.1039/C6SC03879D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu H.; Yang J.; Seckute J.; Devaraj N. K. In Situ Synthesis of Alkenyl Tetrazines for Highly Fluorogenic Bioorthogonal Live-Cell Imaging Probes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5805–5809. 10.1002/anie.201400135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lambert W. D.; Fang Y.; Mahapatra S.; Huang Z.; am Ende C. W.; Fox J. M. Installation of Minimal Tetrazines through Silver-Mediated Liebeskind-Srogl Coupling with Arylboronic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17068–17074. 10.1021/jacs.9b08677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Testa C.; Gigot E.; Genc S.; Decreau R.; Roger J.; Hierso J. C. Ortho-Functionalized Aryltetrazines by Direct Palladium-Catalyzed C-H Halogenation: Application to Fast Electrophilic Fluorination Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5555–5559. 10.1002/anie.201601082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Creary X.; Chormanski K.; Peirats G.; Renneburg C. Electronic Properties of Triazoles. Experimental and Computational Determination of Carbocation and Radical-Stabilizing Properties. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 5720–5730. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Novák Z.; Kotschy A. First Cross-Coupling Reactions on Tetrazines. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3495–3497. 10.1021/ol035312w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ros E.; Prades A.; Forson D.; Smyth J.; Verdaguer X.; Pouplana L. R. d.; Riera A. Synthesis of 3-alkyl-6-methyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazines via a Sonogashira-type cross-coupling reaction. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 11086–11089. 10.1039/D0CC03482G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Presolski S. I.; Hong V.; Cho S.-H.; Finn M. G. Tailored Ligand Acceleration of the Cu-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition Reaction: Practical and Mechanistic Implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14570–14576. 10.1021/ja105743g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Besanceney-Webler C.; Jiang H.; Zheng T.; Feng L.; del Amo D. S.; Wang W.; Klivansky L. M.; Marlow F. L.; Liu Y.; Wu P. Increasing the Efficacy of Bioorthogonal Click Reactions for Bioconjugation: A Comparative Study. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8051–8056. 10.1002/anie.201101817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Majano G.; Mintova S.; Bein T.; Klapötke T. High-Density Energetic Material Hosted in Pure Silica MFI-Type Zeolite Nanocrystals. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2440–2443. 10.1002/adma.200601109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Chavez D. E.; Parrish D. A.; Mitchell L.; Imler G. H. Azido and Tetrazolo 1,2,4,5-Tetrazine N-Oxides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3575–3578. 10.1002/anie.201612496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Steen E. J. L.; Jørgensen J. T.; Denk C.; Battisti U. M.; Nørregaard K.; Edem P. E.; Bratteby K.; Shalgunov V.; Wilkovitsch M.; Svatunek D.; Poulie C. B. M.; Hvass L.; Simon M.; Wanek T.; Rossin R.; Robillard M.; Kristensen J. L.; Mikula H.; Kjaer A.; Herth M. M. Lipophilicity and Click Reactivity Determine the Performance of Bioorthogonal Tetrazine Tools in Pretargeted In Vivo Chemistry. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2021, 4, 824–833. 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu F.; Liang Y.; Houk K. N. Theoretical Elucidation of the Origins of Substituent and Strain Effects on the Rates of Diels-Alder Reactions of 1,2,4,5-Tetrazines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11483–11493. 10.1021/ja505569a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Bickelhaupt F. M.; Houk K. N. Analyzing Reaction Rates with the Distortion/Interaction-Activation Strain Model. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10070–10086. 10.1002/anie.201701486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu F.; Liang Y.; Houk K. N. Bioorthogonal Cycloadditions: Computational Analysis with the Distortion/Interaction Model and Predictions of Reactivities. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2297–2308. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ess D. H.; Houk K. N. Theory of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions: Distortion/Interaction and Frontier Molecular Orbital Models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10187–10198. 10.1021/ja800009z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kämpchen T.; Massa W.; Overheu W.; Schmidt R.; Seitz G. Zur Kenntnis von Reaktionen des 1,2,4,5-Tetrazin-3,6-dicarbonsäure-dimethylesters mit Nucleophilen. Chem. Ber. 1982, 115, 683–694. 10.1002/cber.19821150228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao Z.; Cao L.; Zhang T.; Hu R.; Wang S.; Li S.; Li Y.; Yang G. Novel Reaction-Based Fluorescence Probes for the Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide in Living Cells. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 2581–2585. 10.1002/slct.201600382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tshepelevitsh S.; Kütt A.; Lõkov M.; Kaljurand I.; Saame J.; Heering A.; Plieger P. G.; Vianello R.; Leito I. On the Basicity of Organic Bases in Different Media. Eur. J. Org Chem. 2019, 40, 6735–6748. 10.1002/ejoc.201900956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mao W.; Chi W.; He X.; Wang C.; Wang X.; Yang H.; Liu X.; Wu H. Overcoming Spectral Dependence: A General Strategy for Developing Far-Red and Near-Infrared Ultra-Fluorogenic Tetrazine Bioorthogonal Probes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202117386 10.1002/anie.202117386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhong X.; Yan J.; Ding X.; Su C.; Xu Y.; Yang M. Recent Advances in Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry for Enhanced PET and SPECT Radiochemistry. Bioconjugate Chem. 2023, 34, 457–476. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

au3c00843_si_001.pdf (9.1MB, pdf)

Articles from JACS Au are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES