Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0307906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307906

Seizure onset and offset pattern determine the entrainment of the cortex and substantia nigra in the nonhuman primate model of focal temporal lobe seizures

Mark J Connolly 1,2, Sujin Jiang 3, Lim C Samuel 3, Claire-Anne Gutekunst 4, Robert E Gross 2,4,5, Annaelle Devergnas 1,6,*
Editor: Ayataka Fujimoto7
PMCID: PMC11356443  PMID: 39197026

Abstract

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of drug-resistant epilepsy. A major focus of human and animal studies on TLE network has been the limbic circuit. However, there is also evidence suggesting an active role of the basal ganglia in the propagation and control of temporal lobe seizures. Here, we characterize the involvement of the substantia nigra (SN) and somatosensory cortex (SI) during temporal lobe (TL) seizures induced by penicillin injection in the hippocampus (HPC) of two nonhuman primates. The seizure onset and offset patterns were manually classified and spectral power and coherence were calculated. We then compared the 3-second segments recorded in pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal periods based on the seizure onset and offset patterns. Our results demonstrated an involvement of the SN and SI dependent on the seizure onset and offset pattern. We found that low amplitude fast activity (LAF) and high amplitude slow activity (HAS) onset patterns were associated with an increase in activity of the SN while the change in activity was limited to LAF seizures in the SI. However, the increase in HPC/SN coherence was specific to the farther-spreading LAF onset pattern. As for the role of the SN in seizure cessation, we observed that the coherence between the HPC/SN was reduced during burst suppression (BS) compared to other termination phases. Additionally, we found that this coherence returned to normal levels after the seizure ended, with no significant difference in post-ictal periods among the three types of seizure offsets. This study constitutes the first demonstration of TL seizures entraining the SN in the primate brain. Moreover, these findings provide evidence that this entrainment is dependent on the onset and offset pattern and support the hypothesis that the SN might play a role in the maintenance and termination of some specific temporal lobe seizure.

1. Introduction

Epilepsy affects up 1% of the population with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) being the most common form of drug-resistant partial epilepsy [1]. For patients with drug resistant TLE, therapies include surgery to resect the epileptogenic tissue [2] or deep brain stimulation either at the focus (e.g., hippocampus) or within the same circuit (e.g., anterior nucleus of the thalamus [35]. While effective at reducing seizures, these therapies do not often result in complete seizure-freedom [6]. One way to improve treatments for TLE may be to account for the propagation of the seizure to other extralimbic structures. A major focus of human and animal studies on TLE network has been the limbic circuit and the structures composing the temporal lobe. However, there is also evidence suggesting an active role of the basal ganglia (BG) in the propagation and control of temporal lobe seizures. The BG network is a complex grouping of interconnected structures that receive diverse and topographically organized inputs from the cortex and thalamus [7, 8] and is indirectly connected to the hippocampus (HPC), and amygdala [912]. Studies using intracranial recording have reported changes in oscillatory activity of BG structures including the putamen, pallidum, and caudate when temporal lobe seizures propagated beyond the temporal lobe [13, 14] and in the putamen during temporal lobe seizures with ictal limb dystonia [15]. In addition, a PET study in patients with temporal and extratemporal epilepsy found a decreased uptake of [18F] fluoro-L-dopa in the substantia nigra (SN), caudate, and putamen compared to healthy controls [16]. As one of the major outputs of the BG, the SN has been proposed to be a critical node responsible for the maintenance of temporal lobe seizures. In rodents, direct and indirect inhibition of the SN results in control of amygdala-kindled seizures [1719]. Moreover, inhibition of the SN, particularly the anterior SN has been shown to be anti-ictogenic across a range of different models of focal and generalized seizures [2026]. Similarly, low frequency stimulation of the SN has been found to suppress seizures in a cat penicillin (PCN) hippocampal seizure model [27]. Likewise, it has been shown that temporal lobe (TL) seizures can modulate activity in frontal cortical areas [28]. Studies have also consistently shown cognitive decline in patients with TLE [29]. Finally, TL seizures are associated with reduced connectivity between the temporal lobe and other cortical structures including the sensorimotor cortex (SI) [30]. Evidence also suggests that the network involved in temporal lobe seizure propagation may depend on the seizure dynamics. Most studies have focused their interest on seizure onset pattern [3135] yet, studies on seizure termination may also provide valuable information to develop new personalized treatments to improve seizure outcome [36, 37]. So far, studies on the relationship between extralimbic activity and the onset and offset dynamic of temporal lobe seizures have been limited [35]. Here, we characterize the involvement of the SN and SI during temporal lobe seizures induced in two nonhuman primates (NHP) and test the hypothesis that seizure differentially propagate through these neural circuits based on their onset and offset pattern.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Overview

We recorded local field potential (LFP) activity from the HPC and SN in two NHPs during temporal lobe seizures induced by local injection of penicillin in the HPC. Using these recordings, we characterized the changes in the oscillatory activity of the SN and SI during the ictal period and how the coherence between the HPC and SN or SI changes depending on the seizure onset and offset pattern.

2.2 Animals, surgical procedures

Two rhesus macaques (macaca mulatta; 6–10 kg; one male, one female) were used for electrophysiological recording of the HPC and SN during temporal lobe seizures. The animals were pair-housed with other animals and had free access to food and water. All experiments were performed in accordance with the United States Public Health Service Policy on the humane care and use of laboratory animals, including the provisions of the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” [38]. All studies were approved by the Institutional Biosafety and Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) of Emory University. The animals were first habituated to be handled by an experimenter and to sit in a primate chair. They then underwent aseptic surgery under isoflurane anesthesia (1–3%). Both animals had a recording chamber (Crist Instruments, Hagerstown, MD; inner chamber diameter 18 mm) implanted on their right side. The chamber was placed vertically in the coronal plane to permit simultaneous access to the HPC (for recording and injection) and the SN (for recording) (Fig 1B). NHP 2 had an additional electrode lead chronically implanted in the HPC (D08-15AM, 2 mm contact length, 1.5 mm between contacts, DIXI medical, France) and 2 ECoG electrodes located in the ipsilateral SI.

Fig 1. Electrode targeting.

Fig 1

(A) Schematic representation of the electrode placement in the SN and PCN injection site in the HPC as well as electrode placement in the HPC and SI. The signal from the red contacts located in the ventral and dorsal part of the structure and in SI were subtracted from each other to obtain a bipolar recording signal in each structure. (B) Nissl stained sections showing the PCN injection site (black arrow) and electrode insertion tracts in the HPC for NHP 1 and 2. (C) TH staining showing the electrode tract in the SN for NHP 1 and 2. Abbreviations: Substantia nigra pars reticulata (SN), Hippocampus (HPC), Penicillin (PCN). Scale bars: B: 9 mm, C: 6 mm.

2.3 Seizure induction

Seizures were induced by an intrahippocampal injection of PCN diluted in sterile water (Penicillin G sodium salt (P3032), and sterile water for injection from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI). Final concentration of PCN was 1,000 I.U./μl and for each session a dose of 6,000–10,000 I.U. of PCN was delivered at a rate of 1 μl/min using an injection system connected to a mechanical pump and microsyringe (CMA, Harvard Biosciences Inc, Krista, Sweden). At the end of the injection, the system was clamped to prevent any additional PCN leakage and carefully raised. Details of the model have been previously described [39]. Each PCN injection induced multiple spontaneous self-terminating seizures over a period of 4–6 hours and injections were separated by at least 2 weeks. No spontaneous behavioral seizures were observed in between injections. The seizures induced were focal and not associated with obvious clinical motor symptoms. No oral automatisms were noted during ictal events.

2.4 Electrophysiological mapping and recording

Recordings were made while the animals were seated in a primate chair with their head fixed but body and limbs were free to move. Neural activity was recorded using a Cerebus data acquisition system (Blackrock Neurotech, Salt Lake City, UT). A post-surgery MRI was performed to orient the chamber and the locations of SN and HPC were confirmed by extracellular activity recorded with tungsten microelectrodes (FHC, Bowdoinham, ME; Z = 0.5–1.0MΩ). The dura was pierced with a guide cannula and the electrode lowered into the brain with a microdrive (Nan instrument, Nof Hagalil, Israel). After delineating the SN and HPC borders, both structures were targeted for simultaneous LFP recordings with a 12-contact electrode consisting of 4 rings divided in 3 segments (outer diameter 600μm; inter-contact separation, 500μm; impedance, 25–35 kΩ; Heraeus Medical Components, St Paul, MN). On each recording day, one electrode was placed in the SN and the other in the HPC for simultaneous recordings from the two structures. The injection system was then lowered into the HPC, and seizures were induced. For NHP 2, electrocorticography (ECoG) from the SI was simultaneously recorded using a bipolar montage. LFP and ECoG signals were sampled at 2 kHz synchronized with the video of the animal.

2.5 Data processing and analysis

2.5.1 Pre-processing

Data were imported in Spike 2 interface (CED, Cambridge, UK) for offline annotation of ictal activity. Ictal activities were manually marked based on electrophysiological signal. We recorded 14 and 59 seizures respectively in NHP 1 and NHP 2. Subsequent analysis was performed using MATLAB (MATLAB R2021a, The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). The signal from each electrode contact was first normalized, then the 3 directional contacts positioned at the same level were averaged to mimic a configuration analogous to a clinical concentric 4x1 electrode. Finally, the signal from the contact located in the ventral part of the structure was subtracted from the signal in the dorsal part to obtain a bipolar recording signal in each structure (Fig 1A).

2.5.2 Seizure classification

The seizure onset and offset patterns were classified by a trained experimenter based on the three first and last seconds of the seizure.

Onset pattern: We identified 2 common seizure onset patterns. The low amplitude fast (LAF) activity onset pattern is characterized by low amplitude oscillations in the beta range that increases in amplitude as the seizure progresses. The high amplitude slow (HAS) activity onset pattern is characterized by high amplitude low frequency oscillations at seizure onset [32, 40].

Offset pattern: We identified 3 characteristic seizure offset patterns. The arrhythmic offset pattern (ARR) is characterized by spike of irregular amplitudes, and mixed and oscillatory frequencies. The rhythmic offset pattern (RHY) is characterized by high amplitude spikes and consistent inter-spike intervals. The burst suppression offset pattern (BS) is characterized by high amplitude, high frequency bursts interrupted by a period of suppressed activity [36, 37, 41].

The distribution of seizure onset and offset patterns was compared between animals using a Chi-square test.

2.5.3 Analysis

Simultaneous recordings from the HPC, SN, and SI were analyzed using the Chronux analysis software [42]. The individual power spectrogram and coherogram between signals was calculated using the multi-taper time-frequency method (moving window of 1 second and a window shift of 0.25 seconds). We extracted the power spectral density from the 3 seconds of signal preceding the seizure (pre-ictal), the 3 first seconds of the seizure onset and in the 3 last seconds of the seizure offset. The change in power and coherence were analyzed in 3 frequency bands: 1–7 Hz, 8–12 Hz and 13–25 Hz. These frequency bands were chosen based on the spectral activity of our PCN-induced seizure and previous clinical studies showing a cut off between LAF and HAS at 8 Hz [43]. All quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The statistical reliability of the differences between periods of interest (pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal) was assessed either using a Friedman repeated measures test for paired quantitative data and Dunnett’s test for post hoc analysis or a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for paired quantitative data. Comparisons between seizure pattern were performed with a Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test. Statistical values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.

2.6 Histological verification of electrode placement

After completion of the experiment, the animals were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg, i.v.) and transcardially perfused with cold oxygenated Ringer’s solution, followed by a fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in a phosphate buffer (PB) solution. After perfusion, the brains were cut coronally and session encompassing the SN were immunostained using a tyrosine hydroxylase antibody or cresyl violet to identify the position of the SN and verify the location of the electrode tract (see detail of the method in S1 File).

3. Results

3.1 Early involvement of the SN during TL seizure

We first analyzed all the seizures combined and found that for both animals, HPC activity was characterized by an increase in the 1–7 Hz, 8–12 Hz and 13–25 Hz frequency bands at seizure onset (Fig 2 and S1 Table). In the offset period, these oscillatory activities were still significantly higher in the 13–25 Hz range for both animals and in the 8–12 Hz for NHP 1 (Fig 2E). In contrast, while the power of the HPC in the low frequency band 1–7 Hz was increased at the beginning of the seizure, it returned to pre-ictal levels by the offset period (Fig 2E). No change was observed in the low frequency activity of the SN but for both animals the power in the 8–12 Hz and 13–25 Hz frequency range was increased at the seizure onset (Fig 2E). These initial increases of oscillatory activity in the SN remained significantly higher during the rest of the seizure for NHP 2 but were no longer significant during the offset period for NHP 1.

Fig 2. Power spectral density of the SN and HPC during seizures.

Fig 2

(A) Example from NHP 1, of simultaneous recording obtained in the HPC and in the SN during a temporal lobe seizure with a focus on the start (B) and end (C) of the seizure. (D) Averaged spectral power obtained for NHP 1 in the HPC and SN at the start and end of the seizure. (E) Changes in the averaged power in the 1–7 Hz, 8–12 Hz and 13–25 Hz range in the HPC and SN for NHPs 1 and 2. Results are mean ± SEM. Statistical comparison performed with a Friedman repeated test and Tuckey for post hoc comparison with the pre-ictal values, *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.

3.2 Increase in coherence between the HPC and SN

For both animals and all seizures combined, the increase in coherence between the HPC and SN was limited to the 13–25 Hz frequency band at the seizure onset (Fig 3B). The coherence in the other frequency ranges examined was either decreased or unchanged (S2 Table).

Fig 3. Coherence between HPC and SN during seizures.

Fig 3

(A) Colormap representation of the averaged HPC/SN coherence obtained for NHP 2 at the start and end of the seizure. (B) The averaged HPC/SN coherence for NHP 1 and 2. Results are mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed with a Friedman repeated test and Tuckey for post hoc comparison with the values preceding the seizures, *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.

3.3 Change in HPC/SN activity depends on seizure onset pattern

We identified a total of 18 seizures with an HAS onset pattern (22% and 25% of the seizures recorded in respectively NHP 1 and NHP 2) and 44 seizures with a LAF onset pattern (57% and 61% of the seizures recorded in NHP 1 and NHP 2). Eleven seizure onsets did not fall under either the HAS or LAS pattern and were therefore removed from subsequent analysis (21% and 14% respectively for NHP 1 and NHP 2). No difference was found in the proportion of seizure onset patterns between animals (Chi-square 0.22, Fig 4A–4C).

Fig 4. Effect of seizure onset pattern on HPC/SN activity.

Fig 4

Example of typical LAF (A) and HAS (B) seizure showing HPC recording and corresponding spectral power. (C) Percentage of LAF, HAS, and undetermined seizures for NHP 1 and 2. (D) Changes in the averaged SN power and (E) HPC-SN coherence for LAF and HAS seizures. Results are mean ± SEM. Statistical testing for comparison of pre-ictal and onset periods was performed with a Wilcoxon signed rank test, *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001. Comparisons between LAF and HAS seizures were performed with a Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test, # <0.05. Statistical values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.

For both HAS and LAF onset seizures, the oscillatory power in the SN was increased in the 8–12 Hz and in the 13–25 Hz range (Fig 4D and S3 Table). The increase in HPC/SN coherence in the 13–25 Hz frequency range during the first 3 seconds of the seizure was specific to the LAF onset pattern (Fig 4E). No significant increase in HPC/SN coherence was found for the HAS onset pattern. However, the pre-ictal HPC/SN coherence was greater for the HAS seizures compared to the LAF seizures in the 1–7 Hz and 13–25 Hz range (Fig 4E and S3 Table) which might explained why we did not find an increase on the HAS seizure onset in the 13–25 Hz range.

3.4 Change in HPC/SN activity depends on seizure offset pattern

We identified a total of 36 seizures with an ARR offset pattern, 21 with a RHY and 12 with a BS offset pattern. Four seizure offsets did not fall under either the ARR, RHY or BS pattern and were therefore removed from subsequent analysis (Fig 5A–5D). A significant difference was found in the proportion of seizure offset patterns between animals (Fig 5D, Chi-square <0.001).

Fig 5. Effect of seizure offset pattern on HPC/SN activity.

Fig 5

Example of typical ARR (A), RHY (B) and BS (C) seizure offset pattern. (D) Percentage of ARR, RHY, BS and undetermined seizures for NHP 1 and 2. (E) Changes in the averaged SN power and (F) HPC-SN coherence for LAF and HAS seizures. Results are mean ± SEM. Statistical comparison for comparison of offset and post-ictal period was performed with a Wilcoxon signed rank test, *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001. Comparisons between ARR, RHY and BS seizures were performed with an ANOVA and Dunn’s Post hoc test, # <0.05, ##<0.01. Statistical values were corrected for multiple comparison using the Bonferroni method.

For all the offset patterns and all the frequency band analyzed, the oscillatory power in the SN was significantly decreased in the post-ictal period compared to the offset period (Fig 5E and S4 Table). For the ARR seizure offset pattern, we found an increase in HPC/SN coherence in the post-ictal period in the 8–12 Hz frequency range. We also found an increase of coherence in the post-ictal period for the BS offset in the 1–7 Hz and 13–25 Hz range, and interestingly during the offset periods the HPC/SN coherence in the BS seizure was lower compared to the ARR and RHY (Fig 5F and S4 Table). These results suggest that the SN might be involved in the ending of the BS seizures.

3.5 Change in HPC/SI activity depends on seizure onset and offset pattern

In NHP 2, we recorded the activity of the SI during 36 LAF and 15 HAS seizures (Fig 6A). We only found an increase of cortical oscillatory power at the beginning of the LAF seizures in the 1–7 Hz and 13–25 Hz ranges (Fig 6B and 6C and S5 Table). Interestingly, we found that for all the frequency band analyzed, the cortical activity in the pre-ictal and onset period was significantly higher during LAF compared to HAS seizures which suggest that, on the contrary to the SN, the SI is more entrained by the LAF seizure type. The coherence between the HPC and SI was increased at the seizure onset in the 1–7 Hz range for both type of seizure and no difference in coherence was found between the LAF and HAS seizure onset. The coherence in the other frequency band were not significantly changed at the seizure onset (S5 Table).

Fig 6. Influence of temporal lobe seizure onset and offset pattern on cortical activity.

Fig 6

(A) Example of simultaneous recordings obtained from the HPC and the SI in NHP 2. (B) Changes in the averaged SI power for LAF and HAS seizures. (C) Colormap of the averaged HPC/SI coherence (LAF and HAS combined) and changes in the averaged HPC/SI coherence in the 1–7 Hz for LAF and HAS seizures. (D) Changes in the averaged SI power for ARR, RHY and BS seizures. (C) Colormap of the averaged HPC/SI coherence (LAF and HAS combined) and changes in the averaged HPC/SI coherence in the 1–7 Hz for LAF and HAS seizures. Results are mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons between pre-ictal vs onset and offset vs postictal were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank test *<0.05, **<0.01 and ***<0.001. Comparisons between LAF and HAS seizures were performed with a Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test, and comparison between ARR, RHY and BS were performed with an ANOVA on rank and Dunn’s Post hoc test # <0.05, ##<0.01. Statistical values were corrected for multiple comparison using the Bonferroni method.

We characterized the offset pattern of these seizures recorded in the SI and found 35 ARR, 9 RHY and 12 BS seizures offset pattern (Fig 6D and 6E and S6 Table). We found a decrease of cortical activity in the post-ictal period for the ARR and RHY pattern in the 8–12 and 13–25 Hz range (Fig 6D). In all the frequency range analyzed, cortical activity was lower during ARR seizure offset pattern compared to RHY and BS. The coherence in the 1–7 Hz range was increased in the post-ictal period of the ARR type and the HPC/SI coherence was overall higher during the RHY offset pattern. These results suggest that the SI might be more involved in the termination of ARR seizure than in the termination of RHY and BS seizure type.

4. Discussion

In this study we recorded LFP activity in the HPC, SN, and SI during PCN-induced temporal lobe seizures. We found a global increase of activity in SN and HPC/SN coherence which confirm the involvement of the SN during temporal lobe seizures. Based on our results, it also seems the SN and SI involvement depend on the seizure onset and offset pattern. Seizures with both LAF and HAS onset patterns were associated with an increase of activity in the SN while the change in activity was limited to LAF seizures in the SI. However, the increase of HPC/SI coherence was similar for both type of onset, while the increase in HPC/SN coherence was specific to the farther-spreading LAF onset pattern. With regard to the involvement of the SN at the offset, the coherence HPC/SN was lower during BS compared to other ending and this coherence was normalized in the post-ictal period with no difference in post-ictal phase between the 3 types of seizure offset. This result suggests that the SN might be involved in the termination of the BS seizure pattern. This study is the first demonstration of temporal lobe seizures entraining the SN in the primate brain. Moreover, these findings provide evidence that this entrainment is dependent on the seizure onset pattern and support the hypothesis that the SN might plays a role in the maintenance and termination of specific temporal lobe seizures.

4.1 The role of the SN in the control of seizures

As one of the major outputs of the BG, the SN has been proposed to be a critical node responsible for the maintenance of temporal lobe seizures. In rodents, direct and indirect inhibition of the SN results in control of amygdala-kindled seizures [1719]. Likewise, inhibition of the SN, particularly the anterior SN has been shown to be anti-ictogenic across a range of different models of focal and generalized seizures [2026]. Similarly, low frequency stimulation of the SN has been found to suppress seizures in a cat penicillin (PCN) hippocampal seizure model [27]. There is also a long history of clinical data implicating the BG in temporal and extratemporal seizures using electrophysiological recordings [1315], measuring cerebral metabolism [44, 45], and advanced fMRI analysis techniques [46]. To our knowledge, however, entrainment of the SN during a temporal lobe seizure has never been observed in the primate brain. Our finding that the coherence between the HPC and the SN is increased during the onset of temporal lobe seizures implicates the primate SN in TL seizures as in rodents and suggests that modulation of the non-human primate SN may have similar anti-seizure effects than in rodents. This increase of activity in the SN was also significant during the offset period for NHP 2 but did not reach significance for NHP 1. We believe that this difference between the 2 animals might be explained by the lower number of seizures for NHP 1 (14 seizures) compared to NHP 2 (59 seizures).

4.2 Entrainment of the SN is dependent on seizure onset pattern

Because of their importance in understanding ictogenesis and predicting treatment outcome, seizure onset patterns have recently drawn increasing attention [40, 47, 48].

The onset (1–5 seconds) of a seizure typically has a morphology consistent with one of several stereotyped onset patterns. Two of the most reported seizure onset patterns in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy are LAF and HAS onset patterns. The LAF seizure onset pattern is characterized by low amplitude oscillations in the beta to gamma range that slowly increase as the seizure progresses, whereas the HAS onset pattern consists of high amplitude slow oscillations usually below the alpha range [32, 33]. While both seizure onset patterns can arise from the same ictogenic circuit, seizures with the LAF onset pattern typically spread farther and have a larger seizure onset zone [3134, 49]. Similar to what has been described in clinical studies, our NHP model exhibited a prevalence of LAF onset pattern [32, 48, 50]. We found that both the LAF and HAS entrained the SN, but only LAF caused an increase in HPC/SN coherence. This finding corroborates clinical studies showing that LAF seizures are typically associated with a larger seizure onset zone and spread farther than HAS seizures in both temporal and extratemporal lobe seizures [3134, 49, 51]. The finding that only the further-spreading LAF seizures influenced the SN would support the hypothesis that the SN plays a role in the propagation and generalization of seizures. However, we also found that the HPC/SN coherence during the pre-ictal period was higher for the HAS than for the LAF seizure type. This result is intriguing and should be investigated further as coherence between the HPC and other subcortical structure might convey information on seizure occurence.

4.3 Entrainment of the SN is dependent on seizure offset pattern

Most studies on seizure dynamics have focused on onset pattern and propagation however, a better understanding of seizure termination may provide critical information regarding seizure mechanisms and open new approaches to treat status epilepticus [52]. Some papers have classified the seizure termination patterns in patients and the classification is very similar to the one we created for our NHP-PCN model [36, 41, 53, 54]. As previously discussed, the role of SN in the termination of seizure has been investigated in several rodent studies however no study has considered the implication of the SN in the context of different seizure termination patterns. Our results shows that the HPC/SN coherence was lower during BS compared to ARR and RHY seizures offset which might suggest that the SN might be involved differently in the termination of seizure depending on their pattern. Similarly, the thalamo-cortical synchronization has been found to vary depending on the offset pattern leading to the hypothesis that hypersynchronization might ultimately leads to the termination of a subtype of seizures [41]. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the difference in HPC/SN coherence obtained for the BS pattern might only reflect the difference in activity at the HPC level.

This study serves as an initial step to demonstrate the role of the substantia nigra (SN) in temporal lobe (TL) seizures. However, inhibiting the SN should be pursued further to investigate its function in terminating burst suppression (BS) offset patterns. Additionally, the implication of the other BG structures should be evaluated to better understand the role of these nuclei in the propagation and termination of TL seizures. Special attention should be given to the unique roles of the direct and indirect basal ganglia pathways. A recent study has shown separate implication of these pathways in frontal lobe seizure [55] while another one found no difference between chemogenetic inhibition of direct and indirect pathway [56]. Exploring the network involvement in function of seizure focus but also the seizure pattern is a necessary step for novel individualized therapy development.

4.4 Propagation network and cortical entrainment of temporal lobe seizures

Multiple studies have shown the propagation of temporal lobe seizures to the SN although the pathway, mechanism, and role of the BG therein remains unclear. It has been suggested that BG activity is modulated by seizures via cortical areas [13, 57], and that the HPC-cortico-striatal connection is the entrance pathway leading to the entrainment of the BG. In support of this theory, studies have shown a preventative effect of GABA antagonist and dopamine agonist injections in the striatum [5860]. Our results also agree with this hypothesis of cortical recruitment, as the LAF seizure that were associated with an increase in HPC/SN coherence were also associated with an increase in HPC/SI coherence. However, while we did not find a difference in HPC/SI coherence for both type of seizure onset, the SI power during HAS seizure was significantly lower than during LAF seizure at seizure onset but also in the pre-ictal state. It is possible that while both type of seizure might propagated similarly to the SI, the indirect and direct BG pathway might be engaged differently based on the SI oscillatory activity [61]. However, we understand the limitation of this study and further simultaneous recordings of the cortex and BG during TL seizure should be performed. Such study would allow for a better understanding of the propagation of each seizure type through this network and a dynamic analysis of the changes in network causality throughout the seizure [35].

4.5 Limitations

Although these results demonstrate the implication of the BG in TLE and the relevance of the seizure patterns when studying pathways and mechanisms, as is often the case in NHP studies the relatively small number of animals is a limitation. The model of PCN-induced seizure model could also be seen as a limitation since it is not a chronic epilepsy model, however this model provides larger amount of on-demand seizures (which was necessary for electrophysiological study) with a variety of onset and offset pattern [39, 62]. Additionally, in our study, the recordings were obtained from the posterior part of the SN on both animals. Although it is well known that the topographical segregation of efferent and afferent connections in the SN is even more pronounced in the NHP than in the rodent [63], we were unable to characterize any regional variability in SN seizure activity because ‐ to limit neural tissue damage caused by acutely targeting deep structures ‐ we only obtained recordings from one SN location. Future studies can address this by recording and modulating different parts of the SN to evaluate the potential topography of seizure regulation in the NHP. Along this line, we acknowledge that without comprehensive EEG recordings, we cannot conclude that the entrainment of the SN was mediated through cortical recruitment and it is possible that the entrainment of the SN could also be due to seizure propagation via another pathway [64]. Finally, our seizure onset and offset classification was only based on the recording done at the seizure focus and the activity in other location were not taken into account. Thus, for the offset pattern we did not evaluate if the seizure was ending synchronously or asynchronously across the brain [31]. A more detailed distinction of the seizure patterns could be made in the future but would require additional seizures and recordings site [36, 37].

5. Conclusion

This work demonstrates the implication of the SN in temporal lobe seizures in NHP. In addition, we showed that the SN and cortex entrainment were dependent on the seizure onset and offset pattern. These results confirm the idea that seizures arising from the same focus might involve different pathways depending on their pattern of progression and termination.

Supporting information

S1 File. Description of the staining method.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s001.docx (14.4KB, docx)
S1 Table. Spectral values in SN in the pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal periods.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s002.docx (15.2KB, docx)
S2 Table. Coherence obtained the pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal periods.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s003.docx (14.5KB, docx)
S3 Table. Spectral and HP/SN coherence in the pre-ictal and onset periods for LAF and HAS onset patterns.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s004.docx (15.8KB, docx)
S4 Table. Spectral values and HP/SN coherence obtained for ARR, RHY and BS offset patterns.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s005.docx (15.7KB, docx)
S5 Table. Spectral and HP/SI coherence in the pre-ictal and onset periods for LAF and HAS onset patterns.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s006.docx (15.2KB, docx)
S6 Table. Spectral values and HP/SI coherence obtained for ARR, RHY and BS offset patterns.

(DOCX)

pone.0307906.s007.docx (16KB, docx)

List of abbreviation

TLE

Temporal lobe epilepsy

SN

substantia nigra

SI

somatosensory cortex

TL

temporal lobe

HPC

hippocampus

LAF

low amplitude fast activity

HAS

high amplitude slow activity

BS

burst suppression

ARR

arrhythmic offset pattern

RHY

rhythmic offset pattern

BG

basal ganglia

LFP

local field potential

ECoG

electrocorticography

Data Availability

Original data are available on the public Dandi repository: Devergnas, Annaelle (2024) SN recording during Temporal lobe seizures (Version 0.240621.2139) [Data set]. DANDI archive. https://doi.org/10.48324/dandi.001069/0.240621.2139

Funding Statement

This work was supported by The National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant UG3-NS100559, and by the National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs P51 OD011132.

References

  • 1.Semah F, Picot MC, Adam C, et al. Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence? Neurology. 1998;51(5):1256. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.5.1256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Surgery for Temporal-Lobe Epilepsy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;345(5):311–318. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200108023450501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salanova V, Sperling MR, Gross RE, et al. The SANTE study at 10 years of follow-up: Effectiveness, safety, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Epilepsia. Jun 2021;62(6):1306–1317. doi: 10.1111/epi.16895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cukiert A, Cukiert CM, Burattini JA, Mariani PP, Bezerra DF. Seizure outcome after hippocampal deep brain stimulation in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: A prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind study. Epilepsia. Oct 2017;58(10):1728–1733. doi: 10.1111/epi.13860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nair DR, Laxer KD, Weber PB, et al. Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy. Neurology. Sep 1 2020;95(9):e1244–e1256. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spencer S, Huh L. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(6):525–537. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70109-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wichmann T, Delong MR. Anatomy and physiology of the basal ganglia: relevance to Parkinson’s disease and related disorders. Handb Clin Neurol. 2007;83:1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(07)83001-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lanciego JL, Luquin N, Obeso JA. Functional neuroanatomy of the basal ganglia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. Dec 1 2012;2(12):a009621. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haber SN, Lynd E, Klein C, Groenewegen HJ. Topographic organization of the ventral striatal efferent projections in the rhesus monkey: an anterograde tracing study. J Comp Neurol. Mar 08 1990;293(2):282–98. doi: 10.1002/cne.902930210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jones DL, Mogenson GJ. Nucleus accumbens to globus pallidus GABA projection: electrophysiological and iontophoretic investigations. Brain Res. Apr 21 1980;188(1):93–105. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90559-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang CR, Mogenson GJ. Electrophysiological responses of neurones in the nucleus accumbens to hippocampal stimulation and the attenuation of the excitatory responses by the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. Brain Res. Dec 17 1984;324(1):69–84. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90623-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kahn I, Shohamy D. Intrinsic connectivity between the hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and ventral tegmental area in humans. Hippocampus. Mar 2013;23(3):187–92. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rektor I, Kuba R, Brazdil M. Interictal and ictal EEG activity in the basal ganglia: an SEEG study in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. Mar 2002;43(3):253–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.28001.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rektor I, Kuba R, Brazdil M, Halamek J, Jurak P. Ictal and peri-ictal oscillations in the human basal ganglia in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. Mar 2011;20(3):512–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuba R, Rektor I, Brazdil M. Ictal limb dystonia in temporal lobe epilepsy. an invasive video-EEG finding. Eur J Neurol. Nov 2003;10(6):641–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00684.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bouilleret V, Semah F, Chassoux F, et al. Basal ganglia involvement in temporal lobe epilepsy: a functional and morphologic study. Neurology. Jan 15 2008;70(3):177–84. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000297514.47695.48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deransart C, Le BT, Marescaux C, Depaulis A. Role of the subthalamo-nigral input in the control of amygdala-kindled seizures in the rat. Brain Res. Oct 5 1998;807(1–2):78–83. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00745-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McNamara JO, Galloway MT, Rigsbee LC, Shin C. Evidence implicating substantia nigra in regulation of kindled seizure threshold. J Neurosci. Sep 1984;4(9):2410–7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-09-02410.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shin C, Silver JM, Bonhaus DW, McNamara JO. The role of substantia nigra in the development of kindling: pharmacologic and lesion studies. Brain Research. 1987/06/02/ 1987;412(2):311–317. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91138-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Garant DS, Gale K. Substantia nigra-mediated anticonvulsant actions: role of nigral output pathways. Exp Neurol. Jul 1987;97(1):143–59. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(87)90289-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moshe SL, Garant DS, Sperber EF, Veliskova J, Kubova H, Brown LL. Ontogeny and topography of seizure regulation by the substantia nigra. Brain Dev. 1995;17 Suppl:61–72. doi: 10.1016/0387-7604(95)90074-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu SG, Garant DS, Sperber EF, Moshe SL. Effects of substantia nigra gamma-vinyl-GABA infusions on flurothyl seizures in adult rats. Brain Res. Dec 6 1991;566(1–2):108–14. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91687-v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wicker E, Beck VC, Kulick-Soper C, et al. Descending projections from the substantia nigra pars reticulata differentially control seizures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec 26 2019;116(52):27084–27094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908176117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paz JT, Chavez M, Saillet S, Deniau JM, Charpier S. Activity of ventral medial thalamic neurons during absence seizures and modulation of cortical paroxysms by the nigrothalamic pathway. J Neurosci. Jan 24 2007;27(4):929–41. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4677-06.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Depaulis A, Snead OC, 3rd, Marescaux C, Vergnes M. Suppressive effects of intranigral injection of muscimol in three models of generalized non-convulsive epilepsy induced by chemical agents. Brain Res. Sep 25 1989;498(1):64–72. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90399-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Depaulis A, Vergnes M, Marescaux C, Lannes B, Warter JM. Evidence that activation of GABA receptors in the substantia nigra suppresses spontaneous spike-and-wave discharges in the rat. Brain Res. May 10 1988;448(1):20–9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91097-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sabatino M, Gravante G, Ferraro G, Vella N, La Grutta G, La Grutta V. Striatonigral suppression of focal hippocampal epilepsy. Neurosci Lett. Apr 10 1989;98(3):285–90. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90415-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Englot DJ, Yang L, Hamid H, et al. Impaired consciousness in temporal lobe seizures: role of cortical slow activity. Brain. Dec 2010;133(Pt 12):3764–77. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stretton J, Thompson PJ. Frontal lobe function in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. Jan 2012;98(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haneef Z, Lenartowicz A, Yeh HJ, Levin HS, Engel J Jr, Stern JM. Functional connectivity of hippocampal networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(1):137–145. doi: 10.1111/epi.12476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Perucca P, Dubeau F, Gotman J. Intracranial electroencephalographic seizure-onset patterns: effect of underlying pathology. Brain. Jan 2014;137(Pt 1):183–96. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Velasco AL, Wilson CL, Babb TL, Engel J Jr., Functional and anatomic correlates of two frequently observed temporal lobe seizure-onset patterns. Neural Plast. 2000;7(1–2):49–63. doi: 10.1155/NP.2000.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alarcon G, Binnie CD, Elwes RD, Polkey CE. Power spectrum and intracranial EEG patterns at seizure onset in partial epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. May 1995;94(5):326–37. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00286-t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wetjen NM, Marsh WR, Meyer FB, et al. Intracranial electroencephalography seizure onset patterns and surgical outcomes in nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy. J Neurosurg. Jun 2009;110(6):1147–52. doi: 10.3171/2008.8.JNS17643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ilyas A, Toth E, Chaitanya G, Riley K, Pati S. Ictal high-frequency activity in limbic thalamic nuclei varies with electrographic seizure-onset patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. May 2022;137:183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.01.134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shokooh LA, Toffa DH, Pouliot P, Lesage F, Nguyen DK. Intracranial EEG seizure onset and termination patterns and their association. Epilepsy Res. Oct 2021;176:106739. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Salami P, Borzello M, Kramer MA, Westover MB, Cash SS. Quantifying seizure termination patterns reveals limited pathways to seizure end. Neurobiol Dis. Apr 2022;165:105645. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garber J, Barbee R, Bielitzki J, et al. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals et al. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. 2011; doi: NBK54050 [bookaccession] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sherdil A, Chabardes S, Guillemain I, et al. An on demand macaque model of mesial temporal lobe seizures induced by unilateral intra hippocampal injection of penicillin. Epilepsy Res. May 2018;142:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Y, Trevelyan AJ, Valentin A, Alarcon G, Taylor PN, Kaiser M. Mechanisms underlying different onset patterns of focal seizures. PLoS Comput Biol. May 2017;13(5):e1005475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Evangelista E, Benar C, Bonini F, et al. Does the Thalamo-Cortical Synchrony Play a Role in Seizure Termination? Front Neurol. 2015;6:192. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mitra P, Bokil H. Observed Brain Dynamics. Oxford University Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dolezalova I, Brazdil M, Hermanova M, Horakova I, Rektor I, Kuba R. Intracranial EEG seizure onset patterns in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy and their relationship to other variables. Clin Neurophysiol. Jun 2013;124(6):1079–88. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.12.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bertti P, Dal-Col ML, Wichert-Ana L, et al. The neurobiological substrates of behavioral manifestations during temporal lobe seizures: a neuroethological and ictal SPECT correlation study. Epilepsy Behav. Mar 2010;17(3):344–53. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.12.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sperling MR, Gur RC, Alavi A, et al. Subcortical metabolic alterations in partial epilepsy. Epilepsia. Mar-Apr 1990;31(2):145–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.1990.tb06299.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rektor I, Tomcik J, Mikl M, Marecek R, Brazdil M, Rektorova I. Association between the basal ganglia and large-scale brain networks in epilepsy. Brain Topogr. Apr 2013;26(2):355–62. doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0272-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lagarde S, Buzori S, Trebuchon A, et al. The repertoire of seizure onset patterns in human focal epilepsies: Determinants and prognostic values. Epilepsia. Jan 2019;60(1):85–95. doi: 10.1111/epi.14604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jimenez-Jimenez D, Nekkare R, Flores L, et al. Prognostic value of intracranial seizure onset patterns for surgical outcome of the treatment of epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. Feb 2015;126(2):257–67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Park SA, Lim SR, Kim GS, et al. Ictal electrocorticographic findings related with surgical outcomes in nonlesional neocortical epilepsy. Epilepsy Research. 2002/02/01/ 2002;48(3):199–206. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00006-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ogren JA, Bragin A, Wilson CL, et al. Three-dimensional hippocampal atrophy maps distinguish two common temporal lobe seizure-onset patterns. Epilepsia. Jun 2009;50(6):1361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01881.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Boido D, Jesuthasan N, de Curtis M, Uva L. Network dynamics during the progression of seizure-like events in the hippocampal-parahippocampal regions. Cereb Cortex. Jan 2014;24(1):163–73. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zubler F, Steimer A, Gast H, Schindler KA. Seizure termination. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2014;114:187–207. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-418693-4.00008-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bauer PR, Thijs RD, Lamberts RJ, et al. Dynamics of convulsive seizure termination and postictal generalized EEG suppression. Brain. Mar 1 2017;140(3):655–668. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Amzica F. Basic physiology of burst-suppression. Epilepsia. Dec 2009;50 Suppl 12:38–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02345.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Brodovskaya A, Shiono S, Kapur J. Activation of the basal ganglia and indirect pathway neurons during frontal lobe seizures. Brain. Aug 17 2021;144(7):2074–2091. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zou W, Guo Z, Suo L, et al. Nucleus accumbens shell modulates seizure propagation in a mouse temporal lobe epilepsy model. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1031872. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1031872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Haut SR, Albin RL. Dopamine and epilepsy: hints of complex subcortical roles. Neurology. Sep 9 2008;71(11):784–5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325637.38931.27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Turski L, Cavalheiro EA, Bortolotto ZA, Ikonomidou-Turski C, Kleinrok Z, Turski WA. Dopamine-sensitive anticonvulsant site in the rat striatum. J Neurosci. Nov 1988;8(11):4027–37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-11-04027.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Turski L, Diedrichs S, Klockgether T, et al. Paradoxical anticonvulsant activity of the gamma-aminobutyrate antagonist bicuculline methiodide in the rat striatum. Synapse. Jan 1991;7(1):14–20. doi: 10.1002/syn.890070103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cavalheiro EA, Bortolotto ZA, Turski L. Microinjections of the gamma-aminobutyrate antagonist, bicuculline methiodide, into the caudate-putamen prevent amygdala-kindled seizures in rats. Brain Res. May 19 1987;411(2):370–2. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91089-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vuong J, Devergnas A. The role of the basal ganglia in the control of seizure. J Neural Transm (Vienna). Mar 2018;125(3):531–545. doi: 10.1007/s00702-017-1768-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Devergnas A, Piallat B, Prabhu S, et al. The subcortical hidden side of focal motor seizures: evidence from micro-recordings and local field potentials. Brain. Jul 2012;135(Pt 7):2263–76. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parent A, Mackey A, Smith Y, Boucher R. The output organization of the substantia nigra in primate as revealed by a retrograde double labeling method. Brain Res Bull. Apr 1983;10(4):529–37. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(83)90151-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Spencer SS. Neural networks in human epilepsy: evidence of and implications for treatment. Epilepsia. Mar 2002;43(3):219–27. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.26901.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ayataka Fujimoto

24 May 2024

PONE-D-24-17382Seizure onset and offset pattern determine the entrainment of the cortex and substantia nigra in the nonhuman primate model of focal temporal lobe seizuresPLOS ONE

Dear Dr.  Devergnas,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 08 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ayataka Fujimoto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

   "This work was supported by The National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant UG3-NS100559" 

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: 

   "I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests:Robert E. Gross serves as a consultant to Medtronic, which manufactures products related to the research described in this manuscript and receives compensation for these services. He also receives support for unrelated research. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared. 

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

6. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

7. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

Additional Editor Comments:

Two reviewers have provided their comments. Both believe that this research is significant, so please revise the manuscript according to their feedback.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dr. Connolly et al. studied the involvement of the substantia nigra and somatosensory cortex during temporal lobe seizures induced in two nonhuman primates. They found that the involvement of the SN and SI depends on the seizure onset zone and offset pattern.

Comments (invitation: May 10, 2024, and submission: May 11, 2024)

I want to congratulate the authors’ efforts. The manuscript is well written and easy to follow. None of the following comments are criticisms.

1) Lines 159-162: Would it be possible to provide the location of the electrodes to get the signal from SI in Figure1 or provide a new figure?

2) Lines 256-259: This description differs slightly from Figure 2E, causing confusion. The part stating "These oscillatory activities decreased at the end of the seizures but were still significantly higher in the 13–25 Hz range for both animals" seems to correspond to the blue "Offset" in Figure 2E. However, the part mentioning "in the 8–12 Hz for NHP 1" appears to refer to the green "Post-ictal." Perhaps using "Offset" and "Post-ictal" would clarify the statement, as the term "end of the seizures" is somewhat ambiguous.

3) Line 263-265: What might be the reason for the difference in the duration of SN power between NHP1 and NHP2? Please address this in the Discussion section.

4) Line 343-344: While it's indeed possible that the SN might be involved in the termination of BS patterns, is the SN the cause of BS pattern termination, or are the results obtained in this study a consequence of the termination of the BS pattern? Please elaborate on the authors' thoughts in the Discussion section.

5) Line 380: The authors may want to change from “SI” to “SN”.

6) Line 398-401: What is your interpretation of the fact that only BS seizures, not ARR or RHY, are associated with the SN as observed in the results of this study? Please provide the authors' perspective. Is there a relationship between the termination pattern of BS seizures and the basal ganglia?

7) Section 4.4: In this study, the authors examined the coherence between the HPC and SI, not the relationship between SI and SN. Therefore, it may be challenging to discuss the involvement of the SN and basal ganglia in this paragraph. What are your thoughts on this?

8) Figure 2E: The authors may want to change from 8-12 Hz to 13-25 Hz in the vertical axis of the bottom-right plot.

Reviewer #2: The authors have repeatedly shown the mechanism of neural networks in nonhuman models. While the limbic circuits have been a major focus in temporal lobe epilepsy, this study shows the implication of the SN in temporal lobe seizures in NHP. I believe that this study is valuable in elucidating the circuitry of temporal lobe epilepsy.

There are a few points that could possibly improve the manuscript with a better representation of data.

1)

Why is the penicillin model being used in this study?

I understand that the purpose of this study is to investigate how the epileptic activities propagate to the other extralimbic structures in a temporal lobe epilepsy. The penicillin model is closer to a model of acute symptomatic seizures rather than chronic epilepsy. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to evaluate using a model closer to chronic epilepsy, such as kindling?

If it is convenient, that is fine. It may be mentioned in the limitation.

2)

Ictal DC shifts and ictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are noted as a marker of epileptogenesis in humans.

In this study, it was mentioned that the EEG sampling rate was 2 kHz. This analysis focuses on frequencies between 1 and 25 Hz. Is it correct to understand that frequency bands above 25 Hz did not appear during seizures?

3)

It would be better to standardize the way abbreviations are noted.

In the abstract, "temporal lobe" is abbreviated as "TL," and later it appears as "TLE." Additionally, in the introduction, "hippocampus" is noted as "HPC," but in the abstract, it is immediately referred to as "HPC" without prior introduction.

It can be confusing when an abbreviation appears suddenly without prior introduction, so it would be desirable to standardize the notation method.

Creating a list of abbreviations somewhere might be a good idea.

4)

Is there any mention of data availability? If not, I would like it to be added.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0307906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307906.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Jun 2024

Reviewer #1:

1) Lines 159-162: Would it be possible to provide the location of the electrodes to get the signal from SI in Figure1 or provide a new figure?

Response: We added a sagittal representation on figure 1 to provide the location of the electrode placement in SI. No histological verification could be done as these electrodes were not located inside the brain.

Figure 1: Electrode targeting. (A) Schematic representation of the electrode placement in the SN and PCN injection site in the HPC as well as electrode placement in the HPC and SI. The signal from the red contacts located in the ventral and dorsal part of the structure and in SI were subtracted from each other to obtain a bipolar recording signal in each structure. (B) Nissl stained sections showing the PCN injection site (black arrow) and electrode insertion tracts in the HPC for NHP 1 and 2. (C) TH staining showing the electrode tract in the SN for NHP 1 and 2. Abbreviations: Substantia nigra pars reticulata (SN), Hippocampus (HPC), Penicillin (PCN). Scale bars: B: 9 mm, C: 6 mm.

2) Lines 256-259: This description differs slightly from Figure 2E, causing confusion. The part stating "These oscillatory activities decreased at the end of the seizures but were still significantly higher in the 13–25 Hz range for both animals" seems to correspond to the blue "Offset" in Figure 2E. However, the part mentioning "in the 8–12 Hz for NHP 1" appears to refer to the green "Post-ictal." Perhaps using "Offset" and "Post-ictal" would clarify the statement, as the term "end of the seizures" is somewhat ambiguous.

Response: Thanks for noticing, we corrected the error and replace “end of the seizure” by “offset period” or “post-ictal” when appropriate in the revised manuscript.

3) Line 263-265: What might be the reason for the difference in the duration of SN power between NHP1 and NHP2? Please address this in the Discussion section.

Response: We added a section in the discussion to address this difference between animals.

“This increase of activity in the SN was also significant during the offset period for NHP 2 but did not reach significance for NHP 1. We believe that this difference between the 2 animals might be explained by the lower number of seizures for NHP 1 (14 seizures) compared to NHP 2 (59 seizures).”

4) Line 343-344: While it's indeed possible that the SN might be involved in the termination of BS patterns, is the SN the cause of BS pattern termination, or are the results obtained in this study a consequence of the termination of the BS pattern? Please elaborate on the authors' thoughts in the Discussion section.

Response: Thanks, this is an interesting point, we added a section in the discussion to address it.

“However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the difference in HPC/SN coherence obtained for the BS pattern might only reflect the difference in activity at the HPC level.

This study serves as an initial step to demonstrate the role of the substantia nigra (SN) in temporal lobe (TL) seizures. However, inhibiting the SN should be pursued further to investigate its function in terminating burst suppression (BS) offset patterns. Additionally, the implication of the other BG structures should be evaluated to better understand the role of these nuclei in the propagation and termination of TL seizures. Special attention should be given to the unique roles of the direct and indirect basal ganglia pathways. A recent study has shown separate implication of these pathways in frontal lobe seizure 1 while another one found no difference between chemogenetic inhibition of direct and indirect pathway 2. Exploring the network involvement in function of seizure focus but also the seizure pattern is a necessary step for novel individualized therapy development. “

5) Line 380: The authors may want to change from “SI” to “SN”.

Response: Thanks, this has been corrected.

6) Line 398-401: What is your interpretation of the fact that only BS seizures, not ARR or RHY, are associated with the SN as observed in the results of this study? Please provide the authors' perspective. Is there a relationship between the termination pattern of BS seizures and the basal ganglia?

Response: We added a section in the discussion to address this

However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the difference in HPC/SN coherence obtained for the BS pattern might only reflect the difference in activity at the HPC level.

This study serves as an initial step to demonstrate the role of the substantia nigra (SN) in temporal lobe (TL) seizures. However, inhibiting the SN should be pursued further to investigate its function in terminating burst suppression (BS) offset patterns. Additionally, the implication of the other BG structures should be evaluated to better understand the role of these nuclei in the propagation and termination of TL seizures. Special attention should be given to the unique roles of the direct and indirect basal ganglia pathways. A recent study has shown separate implication of these pathways in frontal lobe seizure 1 while another one found no difference between chemogenetic inhibition of direct and indirect pathway 2. Exploring the network involvement in function of seizure focus but also the seizure pattern is a necessary step for novel individualized therapy development. “

7) Section 4.4: In this study, the authors examined the coherence between the HPC and SI, not the relationship between SI and SN. Therefore, it may be challenging to discuss the involvement of the SN and basal ganglia in this paragraph. What are your thoughts on this?

Response: It has been suggested that BG involvement during TL seizure originated from the cortex however we recognize that our current SI data set does not allow for a conclusion on BG involvement. We added this in the discussion.

“However, we understand the limitation of this study and further simultaneous recordings of the cortex and BG during TL seizure should be performed. Such study would allow for a better understanding of the propagation of each seizure type through this network and a dynamic analysis of the changes in network causality throughout the seizure 3.”

8) Figure 2E: The authors may want to change from 8-12 Hz to 13-25 Hz in the vertical axis of the bottom-right plot.

Response: Thanks, this has been corrected.

Reviewer #2: The authors have repeatedly shown the mechanism of neural networks in nonhuman models. While the limbic circuits have been a major focus in temporal lobe epilepsy, this study shows the implication of the SN in temporal lobe seizures in NHP. I believe that this study is valuable in elucidating the circuitry of temporal lobe epilepsy.

There are a few points that could possibly improve the manuscript with a better representation of data.

1)

Why is the penicillin model being used in this study?

I understand that the purpose of this study is to investigate how the epileptic activities propagate to the other extralimbic structures in a temporal lobe epilepsy. The penicillin model is closer to a model of acute symptomatic seizures rather than chronic epilepsy. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to evaluate using a model closer to chronic epilepsy, such as kindling?

If it is convenient, that is fine. It may be mentioned in the limitation.

Response: The penicillin model was chosen because we needed a large number of seizures exhibiting different onset and offset pattern. Unfortunately, the NHP chronic model do not display as many seizures as the on-demand model 4. In addition, these models are more difficult to manage as most of the time a status epilepticus precede the occurrence of spontaneous recurrent seizures. We added this in our limitation.

2)

Ictal DC shifts and ictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are noted as a marker of epileptogenesis in humans.

In this study, it was mentioned that the EEG sampling rate was 2 kHz. This analysis focuses on frequencies between 1 and 25 Hz. Is it correct to understand that frequency bands above 25 Hz did not appear during seizures?

Response: We intentionally concentrated our analysis on the lower frequencies as they highlighted the differences between various onset and offset patterns. Nevertheless, higher frequencies are also present and could be examined in a subsequent analysis.

3)

It would be better to standardize the way abbreviations are noted.

In the abstract, "temporal lobe" is abbreviated as "TL," and later it appears as "TLE." Additionally, in the introduction, "hippocampus" is noted as "HPC," but in the abstract, it is immediately referred to as "HPC" without prior introduction.

It can be confusing when an abbreviation appears suddenly without prior introduction, so it would be desirable to standardize the notation method.

Creating a list of abbreviations somewhere might be a good idea.

Response: Thanks for noticing. We corrected the errors in abbreviations and created a list of abbreviation.

4)

Is there any mention of data availability? If not, I would like it to be added.

Response: Original data are available on the public Dandi repository:

Devergnas, Annaelle (2024) SN recording during Temporal lobe seizures (Version 0.240621.2139) [Data set]. DANDI archive. https://doi.org/10.48324/dandi.001069/0.240621.2139

1. Brodovskaya A, Shiono S, Kapur J. Activation of the basal ganglia and indirect pathway neurons during frontal lobe seizures. Brain. Aug 17 2021;144(7):2074-2091. doi:10.1093/brain/awab119

2. Zou W, Guo Z, Suo L, et al. Nucleus accumbens shell modulates seizure propagation in a mouse temporal lobe epilepsy model. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1031872. doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.1031872

3. Ilyas A, Toth E, Chaitanya G, Riley K, Pati S. Ictal high-frequency activity in limbic thalamic nuclei varies with electrographic seizure-onset patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. May 2022;137:183-192. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.01.134

4. Croll L, Szabo CA, Abou-Madi N, Devinsky O. Epilepsy in nonhuman primates. Epilepsia. Aug 2019;60(8):1526-1538. doi:10.1111/epi.16089

Attachment

Submitted filename: Plos response_06172024.docx

pone.0307906.s008.docx (192.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Ayataka Fujimoto

15 Jul 2024

Seizure onset and offset pattern determine the entrainment of the cortex and substantia nigra in the nonhuman primate model of focal temporal lobe seizures

PONE-D-24-17382R1

Dear Dr. Annaelle delphine Devergnas,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ayataka Fujimoto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Two reviewers have decided to accept the manuscript. The authors have sincerely addressed the reviewers' comments, and I thank them for that. I will also accept it.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have replied sufficiently to all my comments. It is a very nice manuscript. Kazuki Sakakura

Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed all of the concerns given in the previous review and revised the manuscript accordingly. I have no further comments.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Kazuki Sakakura

Reviewer #2: Yes: Masaki Izumi

**********

Acceptance letter

Ayataka Fujimoto

19 Jul 2024

PONE-D-24-17382R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Devergnas,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ayataka Fujimoto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Description of the staining method.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s001.docx (14.4KB, docx)
    S1 Table. Spectral values in SN in the pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal periods.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s002.docx (15.2KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Coherence obtained the pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal periods.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s003.docx (14.5KB, docx)
    S3 Table. Spectral and HP/SN coherence in the pre-ictal and onset periods for LAF and HAS onset patterns.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s004.docx (15.8KB, docx)
    S4 Table. Spectral values and HP/SN coherence obtained for ARR, RHY and BS offset patterns.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s005.docx (15.7KB, docx)
    S5 Table. Spectral and HP/SI coherence in the pre-ictal and onset periods for LAF and HAS onset patterns.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s006.docx (15.2KB, docx)
    S6 Table. Spectral values and HP/SI coherence obtained for ARR, RHY and BS offset patterns.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0307906.s007.docx (16KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Plos response_06172024.docx

    pone.0307906.s008.docx (192.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Original data are available on the public Dandi repository: Devergnas, Annaelle (2024) SN recording during Temporal lobe seizures (Version 0.240621.2139) [Data set]. DANDI archive. https://doi.org/10.48324/dandi.001069/0.240621.2139


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES