Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0309671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309671

A cascade training protocol for schoolteachers on oral health: Investigating the influence of primary and secondary mentors

Sarah Paul 1,#, Neha Chauhan 1,#, Ritu Duggal 2,#, Bharati Purohit 3,#, Harsh Priya 3,*,#
Editor: Apurva kumar Pandya4
PMCID: PMC11361646  PMID: 39208317

Abstract

Background

Oral health holds paramount importance for overall well-being, particularly among school-aged children, where inadequate oral health can cause significant discomfort and impede educational performance. Despite its critical nature, oral health awareness and practices within Indian school communities remain suboptimal. There exists an urgent necessity for efficacious educational initiatives to bridge this gap and foster oral health awareness among both schoolteachers and students.

Protocol

This monitored training introduces a pioneering cascade model training initiative aimed at evaluating its impact on enhancing oral health knowledge among schoolteachers and students in Indian schools. A total of 100 school teachers from 50 Centre government schools will undergo training in two distinct sessions. Following this, two teachers from each school will be selected to further train 24 class monitors from grades 6–9, who will subsequently impart knowledge to approximately 40 students per class. This phase of the training will be ongoing, ensuring training consistency through online supervision and active participation of the expert team in training activities with newly designated master trainers. Pre- and post-training assessments will be conducted at each level to gauge the monitored training’s effectiveness. The entire training is projected to conclude within a year.

Discussion

This cascade model monitored training initiative represents a novel approach in promoting oral health awareness in Indian schools, marking a pioneering endeavor in this domain. Through this program, we aim to empower 1200 class monitors as master trainers and reach approximately 24,000 school students across 480 supervised training sessions. The establishment of master trainers through a cascade process, coupled with the engagement of the CDER expert team, ensures accurate dissemination of information at every stage. The comprehensive evaluation facilitated by pre- and post-training assessments at each level further enhances the program’s effectiveness, laying a solid foundation for future oral health initiatives within school communities.

Introduction

Oral health is integral to overall well-being, significantly impacting an individual’s ability to communicate, eat, and socialize comfortably, especially during childhood. However, despite its importance, oral health issues among children, such as dental problems leading to discomfort and school absences, remain prevalent [1].

The profound impact of poor oral health on educational outcomes cannot be understated. Children experiencing dental pain or discomfort are more likely to miss school days, leading to significant academic setbacks. Additionally, dental issues can hinder concentration in class, diminishing learning efficiency and academic performance. Addressing oral health concerns within school settings is crucial for the physical health, educational success, and long-term well-being of students [2].

Schools serve as crucial platforms for promoting oral health, providing access to a diverse population of children. Teachers, as frontline caregivers, play a pivotal role in identifying oral health issues among students and promoting preventive measures. However, many teachers lack the necessary training and resources to effectively address oral health concerns [3].

This underscores the need for comprehensive teacher training programs focused on oral health promotion. By equipping teachers with the knowledge and skills to educate students about oral hygiene practices, these programs empower educators to become agents of change within their classrooms and school communities. Leveraging the Cascade model of professional training, these programs aim to create a ripple effect, producing master trainers among both teachers and students.

Rationale of the training program

Existing literature demonstrates the effectiveness of school-based interventions in improving oral health outcomes among children, particularly in low- and middle-income countries [4] Furthermore, training programs targeting teachers have shown promising results in enhancing their knowledge and promoting positive oral health behaviours among students [5].

In this context, our training program aims to go beyond merely training teachers; we strive to create a cascade effect by producing master trainers among both teachers and students. Utilizing the Cascade model of professional training, our program equips teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to train monitors within their classrooms [6]. These monitors, in turn, become adept at disseminating oral health education to their peers, effectively becoming secondary trainers themselves.

Emphasizing the development of master trainers among both teachers and students, our initiative seeks to create a sustainable model of oral health promotion within school settings. Through a rigorous evaluation of the training program’s outcomes, we aim to generate evidence of its effectiveness for large-scale implementation. Ultimately, our goal is to foster a culture of oral health awareness and responsibility among students and teachers, contributing to healthier and more successful learning environments [7,8].

Study design

This training employs an interventional cascade model to assess the effectiveness of a training program on oral health promotion among schoolteachers, class monitors, and students. The cascade model involves training school teachers, who then train class monitors, who subsequently educate their classmates on oral health practices.

Sample size estimation

Participants were nominated by a central educational institution, ensuring diversity in background characteristics. A total of 100 schoolteachers were selected from different regions of India. Each school teacher will further train 24 class monitors from classes 6 to 9, who will then educate approximately 40 students each. Administrative approvals have been obtained for the study. Fig 1 illustrates the total sample size covered in the study, encompassing school teachers, class monitors, and students from various regions of India. The sample includes participants from different schools nationwide, selected by the central educational institution.

Fig 1. Representation of the total sample size covered for the study, including school teachers, class monitors, and school students from various regions of India.

Fig 1

The sample size is inclusive of participants selected from different schools across India by the central educational institution.

Sampling strategy

School teachers were nominated by the central educational institution, representing various regions of India. Class monitors and their respective classes for further training will be selected by the participating school teachers.

Inclusion criteria

Participants include schoolteachers, class monitors, and high school students selected from various schools across five zones of India by the central educational institution.

Exclusion criteria

Individuals unwilling to participate or provide informed consent will be excluded from the study.

Training instrument

A pre-tested, validated, closed-ended, self-structured questionnaire on oral health knowledge, attitude, approach, and actions change will be designed in English for data collection

Methodology

Ethics approval for this study has been taken from the Institute Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Science (Ref. No.: IEC- 210/16.05.2023, RP- 16/2023). Additionally, blanket approval has been secured from the central regulating body of participating government institutions and their respective regional headquarters. The study has been duly registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) under the reference number REF/2023/05/066717. Informed consent will be obtained from teachers, students, and parents of participating students, ensuring their full understanding and voluntary participation in the study.

The 100 school teachers from 50 schools (2 each) from 5 different zones in India will be selected by the central educational institution, divided into 2 batches containing 50 schoolteachers each. Each batch will attend 1 session of training. (Fig 2) The training module will be conducted using an online webinar series comprising standardized PowerPoint presentations.

Fig 2. Flow chart of the methodology of the Cascade progression among the three different tiers.

Fig 2

Prior to the training, all participants will complete a pre-test in the form of an online semi-structured self-administered questionnaire (in English) using Google Documents. After training, post-training data will be collected using the same online questionnaire. A Google feedback form will also be provided at the end of the training session to gather recommendations for program improvement.

Each teacher who underwent training from a particular school, i.e., primary trainers, will be assigned to train 24 class monitors each from grades 6th to 9th. This training will be monitored online by the CDER team, with sessions divided over 24 working days. All class monitors will complete a pre-test using an online semi-structured self-administered questionnaire.

Subsequently, the 2 class monitors of each class will be assigned to train their respective class of 40 students each again monitored by the CDER team. Pre- and post-training data of each student will be obtained using questionnaires shared via Google Forms. It will be ensured that each student undergoing training has access to a computer.

Monitoring

Monitoring will follow a structured format, including capacity building through training of teachers, inculcating oral hygiene practices among students, and reaching out to a larger number of people through the cascade model.

Statistical analysis

The data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize participant demographics and baseline oral health metrics. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will compare pre- and post-training scores on oral health knowledge, attitudes, approaches, and actions. Logistic regression or generalized linear mixed models will identify factors associated with improved oral health outcomes. Subgroup analyses will assess differential effects based on demographics or school settings, with interaction effects explored. Correlation analyses will assess associations between changes in oral health metrics. Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05, and analyses will be conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. Qualitative feedback from the Google form will complement quantitative findings to assess program effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.

Outcome measures

The impact of oral health promotion training for school teachers on knowledge, attitude, approach, and actions change will be assessed. The effectiveness of the training program will be evaluated, along with recommendations to enhance the oral health training program based on discussions with school teachers.

Primary outcome measures

  1. Existing knowledge, attitude, approach, and actions of school teachers on oral health.

  2. Effectiveness of the training program.

  3. Recommendations to escalate the oral health training program based on views and discussions with school teachers.

Secondary outcome measures

  1. Existing knowledge, attitude, and actions of high school students regarding oral health.

  2. Effectiveness of the cascade model of information transmission in oral hygiene promotion.

Uniqueness of the study

This monitored training presents a unique approach to oral health promotion within school settings through the implementation of an interventional cascade model. Several aspects contribute to the uniqueness of this study:

Cascade Model Implementation: This training utilizes a cascade model, wherein schoolteachers are trained to become primary trainers who then train class monitors, ultimately leading to the education of students. This cascading approach ensures the dissemination of oral health knowledge across multiple layers within the school environment, maximizing its reach and impact.

Integration of Technology: This training leverages online webinar series and digital platforms such as Google Documents and Forms for training delivery, data collection, and feedback mechanisms. This integration of technology enables efficient and scalable implementation of the training program, especially in the context of diverse geographic locations.

Collaboration with Central Educational Institution: Collaboration with a central educational institution ensures the involvement of a diverse pool of participants from various regions of India. This collaboration enhances the generalizability of findings and facilitates the implementation of findings at a national level.

Focus on Capacity Building: This training emphasizes capacity building not only among schoolteachers but also among class monitors and students. By empowering multiple stakeholders within the school community, the training aims to create a sustainable culture of oral health awareness and responsibility.

Comprehensive Outcome Measures: The training evaluates a wide range of outcome measures, including changes in knowledge, attitudes, approaches, and actions among schoolteachers and students. This comprehensive assessment provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of the training program and its impact on oral health promotion within schools.

Potential for Scalability: The study’s focus on developing a scalable training module at a renowned institution like AIIMS suggests potential for nationwide and even worldwide implementation of similar programs. By establishing a baseline for future oral health promotion initiatives, the training contributes to the advancement of public health efforts on a global scale.

Possible limitation and challenges

Ensuring active participation and engagement from all participants, including school teachers, class monitors, and students, may be challenging. Resistance to change or competing priorities could hinder the uptake of new oral health practices and concepts, undermining the program’s success.

Furthermore, sustaining momentum beyond the initial training phase presents a significant challenge. Without ongoing support and reinforcement, there is a risk that the knowledge and skills gained during the training may not be sustained over time. Cultural and linguistic diversity among participants also poses a challenge, requiring tailored approaches to ensure inclusivity and effectiveness. Measurement and evaluation of the program’s impact may be methodologically challenging, and logistical considerations such as coordinating training sessions across multiple schools and regions require careful planning. Overcoming resistance to change and fostering a culture of acceptance and commitment to oral health promotion are essential for the success of the training program.

Current status

Pilot study

The initial patient recruitment occurred in the form of requesting teachers to complete a pre-training questionnaire, followed by a training session in the first week of November 2023. These activities transpired after the receipt of ethics approval on 26 May 2023. Subsequently, two teachers from this training further disseminated the training to their monitors and class students, with data collection commencing in January 2024 which we used for pilot analysis. A pilot study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a cascade training approach. Here are the findings regarding the mean scores of oral health knowledge before and after the training (Table 1).

Table 1. The table outlining the mean pre-training scores, mean post-training scores, and associated p-values for teachers, class monitors, and students.

MEAN PRE-
Questionnaire
MEAN POST
Questionnaire
P VALUE
Teachers (n = 2) 13.5 14.5 0.5
Class monitors (n = 15) 8.53 ± 2.53 12 ± 2.07 >0.001
Students (n = 187) 8.10 ± 2.51 10.58 ±2.26 >0.001
  • Among teachers, there was a slight increase in the mean oral health knowledge score after the training.

  • Class monitors showed a significant improvement in their mean oral health knowledge score after the training (p < 0.001).

  • Similarly, students demonstrated a significant enhancement in their mean oral health knowledge score after the training (p < 0.001).

These results indicate a positive impact of the cascade training program on oral health knowledge, particularly notable among class monitors and students. It’s important to note that the lack of statistical significance in the teachers’ group may be due to the small sample size (n = 2) and the primary focus of the training on knowledge dissemination to monitors and students. Overall, these findings underscore the effectiveness of the training program in promoting oral health awareness within the school community.

Status of the current study

The training has advanced to the second stage, with the completion of initial training for school teachers. Currently, focus is on training class monitors in the cascade model. The first stage, training school teachers, has concluded successfully, setting the groundwork for further dissemination of oral health education within school communities. Transitioning to the second stage marks a milestone in implementing the cascade model, fostering sustainable oral health promotion within schools

Conclusion

In conclusion, this monitored training initiative presents a novel and comprehensive approach to oral health promotion within school settings. By implementing an interventional cascade model and leveraging technology-enabled training delivery, the initiative aims to empower schoolteachers, class monitors, and students with the knowledge and skills necessary to promote oral health practices effectively.

Through collaboration with a central educational institution and the involvement of participants from diverse geographic regions, the initiative seeks to generate findings that are not only applicable at a local level but also have the potential for national and global scalability. By focusing on capacity building and evaluating a wide range of outcome measures, including changes in knowledge, attitudes, approaches, and actions, the initiative aims to contribute valuable insights to the field of oral health promotion.

Ultimately, the success of this monitored training initiative has the potential to establish a sustainable culture of oral health awareness and responsibility within schools, thereby improving the oral health outcomes of children and adolescents. Furthermore, by serving as a baseline for future oral health promotion initiatives, the initiative paves the way for the advancement of public health efforts on a broader scale.

In summary, this monitored training initiative represents a significant step towards addressing oral health disparities and promoting overall well-being among school-aged populations, highlighting the importance of holistic approaches to health promotion within educational settings.

Data Availability

The data will be managed by the Institute Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi. For access to the data, please contact the ethics committee using the following email Id ethicscommitteeaiims@gmail.com.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Oral Health Promotion: An Essential Element of a Health-Promoting School. Geneva: WHO; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reisine ST. Dental health and public policy: the social impact of dental disease. Am J Public Health. 1985;75(1):27–30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kwan SY, Petersen PE, Pine CM, Borutta A. Health-promoting schools: an opportunity for oral health promotion. Bulletin of the World Health organization. 2005. Sep;83(9):677–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akera P, Kennedy SE, Lingam R, Obwolo MJ, Schutte AE, Richmond R. Effectiveness of primary school-based interventions in improving oral health of children in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022. Dec;22(1):1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.A Dedeke A., E Osuh M., B Lawal F., Ibiyemi O., O Bankole O., O Taiwo J., Denloye O. and A Oke G. Effectiveness of An Oral Health Care Training Workshop for School Teachers: A Pilot Study. Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine 2013; 11(1): 18–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khurana C, Priya H, Kharbanda OP, Bhadauria US, Das D, Ravi P et al. Effectiveness of an oral health training program for school teachers in India: An interventional study. J Edu Health Prom 2020;9: 98. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_636_19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jain Sandeep, Bhat Nagesh, Asawa Kailash, Tak Mridula, Singh Anukriti, Shinde Kushal et al. Effect of Training School Teachers on Oral Hygiene Status of 8–10 Years Old Government School Children of Udaipur City, India 2016; 10 (8): ZC95–ZC99. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18576.8330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chopra A, Kaur A, Kumar T, Avasthi A, Suri V. oral health awareness among school teachers. TMU J Dent 2021;8(2)38–42. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Apurva kumar Pandya

9 Jul 2024

PONE-D-24-17241A Cascade Training Protocol for School Teachers on Oral Health: Investigating the Influence of Primary and Secondary Mentors.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Priya,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 21 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Apurva kumar Pandya, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:   

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the online submission form, you indicated that [Individual de-identified participant data will be made available on reasonable request, from the corresponding author , starting from the date of publication, until 10 years after publication. Requests beyond this timeframe will be considered on a case-by-case basis. In addition, the study protocol, including the statistical plan are already available as a supplementary appendix attached to this manuscript]. 

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The protocol is well written. I agree with the reviewers' suggestion to make minor changes to the manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors should explain what educational tool they have used to educate the school teachers and the students regarding oral health care. The authors can also add the details of Pre- and post-training assessments they have used to assess the knowledge gain among teachers and students.

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Girish Suragimath, Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharshtra, India.

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0309671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309671.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Aug 2024

Dear Dr. Apurva Pandya,

Thank you for your valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have addressed the points raised in your review as follows:

Suggestion 1: Formatting and Style Requirements

Action Taken: We have ensured that our manuscript meets the PLOS ONE style requirements, including those for file naming. The revised manuscript adheres to the guidelines provided in the PLOS ONE style templates.

Suggestion 2: Data Availability

Action Taken: In accordance with PLOS ONE's data availability policy, we confirm that de-identified participant data will be made available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data underlying our findings will be deposited in a public data repository and made accessible in a masked data sheet to ensure participant confidentiality.

Suggestion 3: Reference List Review

Action Taken: We have reviewed our reference list thoroughly to ensure it is complete and correct. We did not find any retracted papers among our citations. Therefore, no retractions are cited in our manuscript, and all references are up-to-date and relevant.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your positive response.

Kind regards,

Dr. Harsh Priya,

Additional Professor,

Department of Public Health Dentistry

Centre for Dental Education and Research,

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

pone.0309671.s002.pdf (93.3KB, pdf)

Decision Letter 1

Apurva kumar Pandya

16 Aug 2024

A Cascade Training Protocol for School Teachers on Oral Health: Investigating the Influence of Primary and Secondary Mentors.

PONE-D-24-17241R1

Dear Dr. Priya,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Apurva kumar Pandya, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Apurva kumar Pandya

21 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-17241R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Priya,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Apurva kumar Pandya

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0309671.s001.docx (848.1KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    pone.0309671.s002.pdf (93.3KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data will be managed by the Institute Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi. For access to the data, please contact the ethics committee using the following email Id ethicscommitteeaiims@gmail.com.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES