Skip to main content
The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
. 2024 Jul 1;35(7):551–559. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23470

Honokiol Mitigates Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease by Regulating Nrf2 and RIPK3 Signaling Pathways

Wen Cao 1, Zengdian Chen 1, Chenhui Lin 1, Xiaojin Lin 1, Yang Chen 1, Jingjuan Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC11363389  PMID: 39128113

Abstract

Background/Aims:

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. However, there is currently no recognized effective drugs for treating it.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, we investigated the efficacy of Honokiol (HNK) in vitro for mitigating MAFLD. Then, 0.4 mM palmitic acid (PA) and LO2 cells were used to establish the MAFLD model. The protective effect of HNK on MAFLD was confirmed by Oil Red O staining and cell counting kit (CCK-8) assay in LO2 cell line. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot were carried out to analyze the regulatory role of HNK on Nrf2 and RIPK3 signaling pathways. The effect of HNK and its downstream signaling pathways on oxidative stress were verified by the detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). The concentration of IL-1β, IL-6L, and TNF-α was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results:

The middle concentration of HNK (50 μmol/L) was selected as the best option for inhibiting lipidosis and oxidative stress in MAFLD models. Honokiol mitigates MAFLD via activation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathways in vitro. Honokiol suppressed MAFLD via activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway to play an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory role. Also, HNK regulates Nrf2 and RIPK3 signaling pathways to mitigate MAFLD.

Conclusion:

Our results showed that HNK may suppress the oxidative stress and inflammation in MAFLD via activation of Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Keywords: Honokiol, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, Nrf2 signaling pathways, RIPK3


Main Points

  • The lipidosis and oxidative stress in the metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) model are suppressed by the middle concentration of Honokiol (HNK).

  • HNK mitigates MAFLD via activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathways in vitro.

  • HNK suppressed the MAFLD by antioxidation and anti-inflammation effect via the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Introduction

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a common chronic liver disease worldwide that causes excessive deposition of triglycerides in the liver due to genetic susceptibility, overnutrition, and its complications.1,2 The MAFLD disease spectrum includes nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).3,4 The incidence rate of MAFLD has increased year by year.5 In Türkiye, a MAFLD-related cohort study showed a high prevalence of hepatic steatosis (60.1%) while the prevalence of gallbladder stones was 7.6% among the participants.6 Therefore, the exploration of effective intervention measures is crucial. However, there is currently no recognized effective drug for the treatment of MAFLD. At present, the recognized effective treatment for MAFLD is still to reduce the weight of patients through lifestyle intervention.7 This project aims to conduct in-depth research on the relevant mechanisms of MAFLD and search for effective therapeutic drugs, which are of great significance for alleviating the condition of MAFLD patients, improving their survival rate, and quality of life.

Mard et al have reported that crocin can be introduced as a candidate hepatoprotective agent against NASH by virtue of its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic properties.8 Herein, we investigated the effect of another compound, Honokiol (HNK), on MAFLD. Honokiol is a lignan compound extracted from the traditional Chinese medicine Magnolia officinalis,9,10 which has positive effects such as anti-inflammatory,11 antioxidant,12 and improving glucose and lipid metabolism.13 In recent years, HNK has been proven to intervene in the progression of various liver diseases. For instance, Kataoka et al have shown that HNK can inhibit TGF-β1/SMAD signaling in hepatic stellate cells.13,14 Lee et al15 also confirmed that HNK can mitigate HCC cell migration through downregulating Cyclophilin B expression. The above studies suggested that HNK has potential therapeutic effects on MAFLD, while the specific mechanism still needs further in-depth research.

Oxidative stress is widely recognized to be a vital biochemical process in the occurrence and development of MAFLD.16 Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is an important endogenous antioxidant stress pathway and has been reported to play an important role in MAFLD. Afonso et al17 found that the expression level of receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 3 (RIPK3) increased in MAFLD patients. In addition, a previous research indicated that intermittent hypoxia can exacerbate MAFLD by promoting RIPK3-dependent necroptosis and inhibiting the Nrf2 signaling pathway.18 Hence, the effect of HNK on Nrf2 and RIPK3 signaling was investigated in this study.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and Grouping

LO2 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 complete medium (containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin) in the incubator (37°C, 5% CO2, saturated humidity). The palmitic acid (PA) (Sigma, P5585), HNK (Meilunbio, MB5989), Nrf2 inhibitor (APExBIO, B8300), and RIPK3 inhibitor (APExBIO, B8589) were used to treat the LO2 cells. Then, the cells were treated with 0.4 mM PA for 72 hours to construct an MAFLD model.19 Also, different concentrations of HNK, as well as Nrf2 inhibitor and RIPK3 inhibitor, were used to treat the cells to explore the potential regulatory mechanisms of HNK in the text.

The grouping and treatments for cells are as follows:

  1. Control group: LO2 cells.

  2. MAFLD group: LO2 cells + 0.4 mM palmitic acid (PA) for 72 hours.

  3. HNK (high/middle/low dose; 25/50/100 μmol/L) group: LO2 cells + 0.4 mM PA + HNK (100/50/25 μmol/L) for 48 hours.

  4. HNK + Nrf2 inhibitor group: LO2 cells + 0.4 mM PA + HNK (50 μmol/L) + Nrf2 inhibitor (2 μmol/L) for 48 hours.

  5. RIPK3 inhibitor group: LO2 cells + 0.4 mM PA + RIPK3 inhibitor (0.1 μmol/L) for 48 hours.

  6. Nrf2 inhibitor + RIPK3 inhibitor group: LO2 cells + 0.4 mM PA + Nrf2 inhibitor (2 μmol/L) + RIPK3 inhibitor (0.1 μmol/L) for 48 hours.

Oil Red O Staining

LO2 cells were cultured in a 24-well plate at a density of 5 × 106 cells/mL. When the cell confluency reaches about 60%, an appropriate amount of 4% paraformaldehyde was added to each well to fix the cells for 15 minutes. After being washed with distilled water, each well was immersed in 60% isopropanol for 20-30 seconds, and then the isopropanol was added. Each well was stained with 500 μL of oil red O staining solution for 15 minutes, followed by washing with isopropanol to remove the dye solution. Then, each well was stained with a hematoxylin staining solution for 2 minutes and washed with distilled water. Finally, the samples were dried and sealed.

Cell Counting Kit (CCK-8 Assay)

LO2 cells (8 × 104 cells/mL) were cultured in a 96-well plate. Each group was equipped with eight composite wells, and they were cultured until LO2 cells adhered to the wall. Then, 10 μL of CCK-8 enhanced solution was added to each well and incubated for 1 h. The microplate reader was used to determine the absorbance of each sample at 450 nm.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA was isolated from LO2 cells by using TRIzol. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from total RNA using a reverse transcription kit. Target gene expressions were detected using AceQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix on the ABI 7500 PCR system. The cycling parameters used were 95°C for 15 seconds, 55-60°C for 15 seconds, and 72°C for 15 seconds for 45 cycles. Ct values were determined during the exponential amplification phase of real-time PCR. The GAPDH gene was used as the reference gene. The 2−△△Ct method was used to calculate the relative expression levels of the genes.20 All experiments were performed in triplicate. The specific primer sequences were as follows:

  • TGF-β1 Forward: 5′-GGCCAGATCCTGTCCAAGC-3′;

  • TGF-β1 Reverse: 5′-GTGGGTTTCCACCATTAGCAC-3′;

  • TIMP1 Forward: 5′-CTTCTGCAATTCCGACCTCGT-3′;

  • TIMP1 Reverse: 5′- ACGCTGGTATAAGGTGGTCTG-3′;

  • Collagen 1 Forward: 5′-GAGGGCCAAGACGAAGACATC-3′;

  • Collagen 1 Reverse: 5′-CAGATCACGTCATCGCACAAC-3′;

  • GAPDH Forward: 5′-ATGGGGAAGGTGAAGGTCG-3′;

  • GAPDH Reverse: 5′-TCGGGGTCATTGATGGCAACAATA-3′.

Detection of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines

The supernatant of cells in each group was collected. The concentrations of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) (Jianglaibio, JL18442), interleukin 6 (IL-6) (Jianglaibio, JL20269), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (Jianglaibio, JL10484) in the supernatant were assessed based on the instructions of the ELISA kits. All ELISA experiments were performed in triplicate.

Detection of Oxidative Factors

Serum-free culture medium was used to dilute 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), and LO2 cells were grouped and treated as previously described. The supernatant was discarded, and the LO2 cells were added to DCFH-DA and incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes. The suspension was then used for flow cytometry detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Em 488 nm, Ex 525 nm). The oxidative stress level of the cell supernatant was detected based on the instructions of the malondialdehyde (MDA) (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering, A003-2), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering, A001-3), catalase (CAT) (Solarbio, BC0200) kits.

Western Blot

Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer was utilized to extract total protein from each group of LO2 cells. The protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane. The samples were added with the primary antibody and incubated overnight at 4°C. Then samples were added with HRP-labeled IgG antibodies and incubated at 25°C for 1 hour. The samples were processed by ECL and captured by the gel imaging system. The grayscale values of the target bands were determined using Image J software and normalized to GAPDH. The purchased antibodies are listed as follows: GAPDH (1:10 000, Proteintech, cat# 60004-I-Ig), TGF-β1 (1:4000, Proteintech, cat# 21898-1-AP), TIMP1 (1:2000, Boshide, cat# A00561), Collagen I (1:1000, Affinity, cat# AF7001), Nrf2 (1:1000, Abcam, cat# ab62352), HO-1 (1:3000, Proteintech, cat# 27282-1-AP), NQO1 (1:8000, Proteintech, cat# 11451-1-AP), RIP1 (1:3000, Proteintech, cat# 17519-1-AP), RIP3 (1:4000, Proteintech, cat# 17563-1-AP), MLKL (1:10 000, Proteintech, cat# 66675-1-lg), and RP-conjugated Affinipure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG(H+L) (Proteintech, cat# SA00001-2). A Predyed Rainbow Protein marker (10-190KD) (cat. MA0342, Meilunbio) was used as the protein marker.

Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA) was utilized to conduct the statistical analyses. Data were summarized as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the two groups. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

HNK Suppressed the Oxidative Stress in MAFLD In Vitro

First, the antioxidative effect of HNK on MAFLD was investigated in the LO2 cell line. The MAFLD model was established based on the LO2 cell line via induction with 0.4 mM PA for 72 hours. The results of oil red O staining in the MAFLD model presented the most lipid droplet deposition in liver cells. With the treatment of HNK, the lipid droplets were reduced compared to the MAFLD group, especially in the middle dose of HNK (Figure 1A). In addition, we found that ROS levels were increased in MAFLD but significantly decreased in HNK treatment, especially in the middle dose group (P < .05) (Figure 1B). Furthermore, the cell survival rate was lowest in the MAFLD group but improved with HNK treatment, especially in the middle dose of HNK (P < .05) (Figure 1C). The concentration of MDA was increased in the MAFLD group, while it was reduced by HNK treatment (P < .05) (Figure 1D). The activities of SOD and CAT were reduced in the MAFLD group but enhanced by HNK treatment (P < .05) (Figure 1E and 1F). These aforementioned pieces of evidence indicated that lipidosis and oxidative stress in the MAFLD model were suppressed by HNK, especially in the middle concentration of HNK. Subsequently, the middle dose of HNK was selected for the following experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

HNK suppressed the oxidative stress in MAFLD in vitro. (A) The oil red staining was used to evaluate the fat levels in LO2 cells, MAFLD model, MAFLD model treated with high, middle, and low concentration of Honokiol (HNK). Bar = 100 μm. (B) Flow cytometry was used to detect the ROS level in LO2 cells with different treatments. (C) The CCK-8 assay was used to measure the cell survival rate of LO2 cells with different treatments. (D-F) The concentrations of MDA (D) and activity of SOD (E) and CAT (F) were determined by the biochemical detection kits. N ≥ 3, *P < .05 was shown as significance between the 2 groups. Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the 2 groups.

HNK Mitigated MAFLD Via Activation of Nrf2 Signaling Pathways In Vitro

In the next step, we sequentially investigated the underlying mechanism of HNK in the Nrf2 signaling pathway. The mRNA expression levels of fibrosis-related factors (TGF-β1, TIMP1, and collagen I) were detected (Figure 2A). In the MAFLD group, the mRNA expression levels of fibrosis-related factors were remarkably enhanced, while they were reduced by HNK treatment. With the treatment of an Nrf2 inhibitor, the mRNA expression levels of fibrosis-related factors were considerably increased compared to the HNK group (P < .05). The trend of protein levels of fibrosis-related factors (TGF-β1, TIMP1, and collagen I) was consistent with the mRNA levels (P < .05) (Figure 2B and 2C). These results suggested that HNK regulated Nrf2 signaling pathways to mitigate the fibrosis of LO2 cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

HNK regulated the Nrf2–RIPK3 signaling pathway. (A) The mRNA expression levels of fibrosis-related factors (TGF-β1, TIMP1, and collagen I) in the control group, MAFLD model group, HNK group, HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor group, RIPK3 inhibitor group, and Nrf2 inhibitor + RIPK3 inhibitor group were detected by qPCR. *P < .05 was shown as significance between the 2 groups. Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the 2 groups. (B-E) The protein expression levels of fibrosis-related factors (TGF-β1, TIMP1, and collagen I), key factors in the Nrf2 signaling pathway (Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1), and key factors RIPK3 signaling pathway in LO2 cells with different treatments were detected by western blot. n = 3, *P < .05, compared with the control group; # P < .05, compared with the MAFLD group. Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the 2 groups.

The protein expression levels of Nrf2, HO-1, and NQOI were lessened in the MAFLD group but enhanced by the HNK treatment. With the treatment of the Nrf2 inhibitor, the protein expression levels of Nrf2, HO-1, and NQOI were significantly decreased compared with the HNK group, especially with the treatment of both (P < .05) (Figure 2B and 2D). These pieces of evidence indicate that HNK activates the Nrf2 signaling pathway in MAFLD.

After LO2 cells with different treatments were stained with oil red stain, the MAFLD group presented the most lipid droplet deposition, and the HNK group showed the least. With the treatment of the Nrf2 inhibitor, the lipid droplet was observed to be enhanced compared with the MAFLD group (P < .05) (Figure 3A). The cell survival rate of LO2 cells was lowest in the MAFLD group and highest in the HNK group, while the cell survival rate was lessened by the Nrf2 inhibitor (P < .05) (Figure 3B). The evidence above revealed that HNK induced the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway to mitigate MAFLD.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

HNK inhibited MAFLD progression by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway. (A) The oil red stain was utilized to evaluate the fat levels in LO2 cells, the MAFLD model, MAFLD model treated with HNK, RIPK3 inhibitor, Nrf2 inhibitor + RIPK3 inhibitor, respectively. Bar = 100 μm. (B) CCK-8 assay was used to measure the cell survival rate of LO2 cells with different treatments. n = 8, *P < .05 was shown as significance between the 2 groups. Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the 2 groups.

The Negative Feedback Axis of Nrf2 Pathway and RIPK3/MLKL Necroptosis Signaling in MAFLD

Then, the underlying mechanism of Nrf2 in MAFLD was continually explored. As shown in Figure 2A-C, the mRNA and protein expression levels of fibrosis-related factors (TGF-β1, TIMP1, and collagen I) were remarkably decreased in the RIPK3 inhibitor group compared with the MAFLD group, while they were increased in the RIPK3 inhibitor + Nrf2 inhibitor group compared with the RIPK3 inhibitor group (P < 0.05).

The protein expression levels of Nrf2, HO-1, and NQOI were enhanced in the RIPK3 inhibitor group compared with the MAFLD group. Interestingly, these key proteins in the Nrf2 signaling pathway were decreased in the RIPK3 inhibitor + Nrf2 inhibitor group compared with the RIPK3 inhibitor group (P < .05) (Figure 2B and 2D). Furthermore, the protein expression levels of RIP1, RIP3, and MLKL were considerably decreased in the RIPK3 inhibitor group compared with the MAFLD group. Nevertheless, these key proteins in the RIPK3/MLKL necroptosis signaling pathway were decreased in the RIPK3 inhibitor + Nrf2 inhibitor group compared with the RIPK3 inhibitor group (P < .05) (Figure 2B and 2E).

With the treatment of the RIPK3 inhibitor, the lipid droplet was observed to be reduced in the RIPK3 inhibitor group compared to the MAFLD group, while it was increased compared to the RIPK3 inhibitor + Nrf2 inhibitor group (P < .05) (Figure 3A). Nevertheless, the cell survival rate of LO2 cells was increased in the RIPK3 inhibitor group compared to the MAFLD group, while it was decreased in the RIPK3 inhibitor group compared to the RIPK3 inhibitor + Nrf2 inhibitor group (P < .05) (Figure 3B). These results suggested the negative feedback axis of Nrf2 pathway and RIPK3/MLKL necroptosis signaling in MAFLD.

HNK Suppressed the MAFLD by Antioxidation and Anti-inflammation Effect via Activation of Nrf2 Signaling Pathway

Thereafter, the antioxidation and anti-inflammation functions of HNK on MAFLD were verified. On the one hand, the concentration of MDA and ROS ratio showed a significant increase in the MAFLD group, which was reduced by HNK treatment. With the treatment of an Nrf2 inhibitor or RIPK3 inhibitor, the concentrations of MDA and ROS ratio were increased compared to the HNK group (P < .05) (Figure 4A and 4D). On the other hand, the activities of CAT and SOD were significantly decreased in the MAFLD group and enhanced by HNK. With the treatment of an Nrf2 inhibitor or RIPK3 inhibitor, the activities of CAT and SOD were decreased compared to the HNK group (P < .05) (Figure 4B and 4C). Furthermore, the concentrations of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) were highest in the MAFLD group while lowest in the HNK group. The concentrations of inflammatory factors were increased with the treatment of an Nrf2 inhibitor or RIPK3 inhibitor, especially with the treatment of both (P < .05) (Figure 4E-G). These findings reveal that HNK suppressesMAFLD by antioxidation and antiinflammation effect via the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

HNK inhibited MAFLD progression by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway mediated antioxidant activity. (A-C) The concentrations of MDA (A), activity of CAT (B), and SOD (C) in LO2 cells with different treatments were determined by the biochemistry detection kits. (D) Flow cytometry was used to detect the ROS level in LO2 cells with different treatments. (E-G) The concentrations of TNF-α (E), IL-1β (F), and IL-6 (G) (pm/mL) in LO2 cells with different treatments. n = 3, *P < .05 between 2 groups. Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the 2 groups.

Discussion

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease is a common chronic liver disease worldwide, mainly characterized by excessive lipid accumulation in the liver.2,21 Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease leads to oxidative stress response, massive inflammatory lesions, reactive fibrosis, and necrotic feedback in liver cells.22 With the continuous improvement in people’s quality of life, the number of patients with MAFLD is gradually increasing, and the prevention and treatment of the disease are gradually attracting more attention.23 However, there is currently a lack of effective drugs for the treatment of MAFLD. Here, our results showed that HNK inhibited MAFLD by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway to play an antioxidant and antiinflammatory role.

Oxidative stress is widely recognized to be vital in the occurrence and development of MAFLD.16 During the progression of MAFLD, excessive lipid deposition can provide a reaction matrix for lipid peroxidation damage, leading to the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products and causing oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in liver cells, eventually leading to the further deterioration of MAFLD.24 Nrf2 is one of the most necessary endogenous antioxidant stress pathways in cells.25 Several studies have shown that many drugs can mitigate symptoms of the diseases via the Nrf2 pathway. For example, baicalin exerts neuroprotective actions by regulating the Nrf2–NLRP3 axis.26 Under normal conditions, Nrf2 is in the cytoplasm and binds to the specificity receptor Kelch-like epoxide propane-associated protein-1 (Keap1) in the form of dimerization.27 Under oxidative stress and other conditions, Nrf2 dissociates from Keap1 and translocates into the nucleus.28 By binding with antioxidant response elements, it initiates the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes such as quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), inhibits the release of ROS, and ultimately exerts antioxidant capacity.29 The antioxidant mediated by Nrf2 plays a protective role in the progression of MAFLD.30 Wang et al showed that dietary selenium supplementation could alleviate obesity-induced oxidative stress and MAFLD in mouse livers by regulating the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway.31 In addition, a study showed that HNK attenuated hepatic oxidative damage and insulin resistance by upregulating the expression of Nrf2.32 In our study, the results indicated the HNK suppressed oxidative stress in MAFLD in vitro, and with the treatment of an Nrf2 inhibitor, protein expression levels of Nrf2, HO-1, and NQOI were significantly decreased compared with the HNK group. Therefore, we speculate that HNK may inhibit the progression of MAFLD by mediating antioxidant activity through the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

A previous research has shown that activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway can prevent ethanol-induced liver cell necroptosis.33 Necroptosis is a caspase-independent programmed cell death, in which mixed MLKL is recruited to form the necrosome complex composed of RIPK1 and RIPK3 in response to tumor necrosis factor.34 Vinpocetine mitigates methotrexate-induced duodenal intoxication by modulating RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL signals.35 Recently, a study indicated that necroptosis is necessary for the progression of MAFLD.36 Afonso et al17 found that the expression level of RIPK3 was increased in MAFLD patients and its knockout could significantly inhibit mouse liver inflammation and carcinogenesis. Hao et al37 demonstrated that berberine could alleviate the progression of mouse MAFLD by activating the Nrf2 pathway, accompanied by downregulation of RIPK3 expression, suggesting that Nrf2 may be associated with RIPK3-mediated necroptosis in the development of MAFLD. In addition, Zhang et al18 found that intermittent hypoxia could exacerbate MAFLD by promoting RIPK3-dependent necroptosis and inhibiting the Nrf2 signaling pathway. In this study, with the treatment of RIPK3 inhibitor, the lipid droplet was decreased compared with the MAFLD group, while cell survival was increased. The antioxidation and antiinflammation effect of HNK on MAFLD was lessened by the RIPK3 inhibitor. Therefore, it suggested that the Nrf2 pathway and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis may form a negative feedback axis and participate importantly in the progression of MAFLD. HNK suppressed the MAFLD by antioxidation and antiinflammation effect via the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Herein, we investigated the protective role of HNK by the MAFLD cell model. The potential therapeutic effect of HNK on MAFLD features, including inflammation and oxidative stress, was evaluated. Nevertheless, some limits were obvious in this study, for instance, the protective role of HNK in MAFLD should be verified in vivo. The underlying mechanism of the Nrf2 pathway and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis needs more investigation.

In conclusion, the study indicates that HNK suppresses oxidative stress and inflammation in MAFLD via activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway. The Nrf2 pathway and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis may form a negative feedback axis and participate importantly in the progression of MAFLD. This study provides a potential treatment compound for MAFLD.

Supplementary Table 1.

The Data of Figure 1B

Control MAFLD HNK low HNK middle HNK high
1 1.07 24.7 11.2 1.18 4.49
2 1.01 24.5 10.7 1.19 4.87
3 1.04 24.3 11.6 1.34 4.72

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 2.

The Data of Figure 1C

Control MAFLD HNK low HNK middle HNK high
1 98.4505 35.4817 57.669 90.815181 74.9158
2 102.403 33.0564 50.4828 103.30115 77.9699
3 100.247 37.0986 54.0759 97.552212 72.221
4 94.1388 36.2003 54.9742 95.845497 71.5024
5 99.2589 33.8648 62.34 99.977543 77.2513
6 101.684 35.1224 47.3389 101.5046 68.1788
7 104.289 28.3854 54.3454 104.82821 75.8141
8 99.5284 32.8767 53.7166 99.887716 71.2329

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 3.

The Data of Figure 1D

Control MAFLD HNK low HNK middle HNK high
1 8.66722 14.5455 14.1912 10.655172 12.2027
2 7.97129 15.8713 12.8534 9.1138153 11.0122
3 8.41148 16.4196 12.8727 10.024014 11.7125

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 4.

The Data of Figure 1E

Control MAFLD HNK low HNK middle HNK high
1 16.974 10.0744 11.4243 14.433157 13.9519
2 17.0705 8.37383 13.0345 15.922465 12.1495
3 16.0386 10.0344 13.7072 14.241211 15.5123

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 5.

The Data of Figure 1F

Ethics Committee Approval MAFLD HNK Low HNK middle HNK high
1 0.86648 0.37154 0.73088 0.744444 0.61156
2 0.9275 0.43392 0.48952 0.679356 0.60884
3 0.79462 0.40002 0.48952 0.734952 0.63868

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 6.

The 2-△△Ct Value of The Genes in Figure 2A

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
TGF-β1 1.1 1 1 1.9 1.78 1.728 1.11 1.02 1.1 1.54 1.6 1.6 1.43 1.37 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6
TIMP1 1 1.1 1 2.1 2.12 1.981 1.15 1.04 1.2 1.61 1.5 1.5 1.38 1.43 1.4 1.88 1.9 1.8
Collagen I 1 1 1 1.8 1.88 1.791 1.14 1.13 1.2 1.44 1.5 1.5 1.24 1.3 1.3 1.53 1.6 1.5

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 7.

The Relative Expression of The Proteins in Figure 2

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
TGF-β1 0.4 0.3 0 1.4 1.63 1.564 0.45 0.5 0.5 0.87 0.9 0.9 0.63 0.75 0.7 1.18 1.2 1.1
TIMP1 0.3 0.3 0 1.4 1.56 1.617 0.47 0.47 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.64 0.71 0.67 1.26 1.3 1.1
Collagen I 0.3 0.3 0 1.5 1.79 1.776 0.66 0.71 0.7 1.23 1.3 1.1 0.95 1.02 0.98 1.57 1.5 1.5
Nrf2 1.7 1.6 2 0.3 0.33 0.306 1.35 1.33 1.4 0.82 0.8 1 1.07 1.17 1.06 0.61 0.5 0.5
HO-1 1.6 1.6 2 0.3 0.22 0.327 1.19 1.05 1.2 1.05 0.7 0.9 1.01 0.84 1.16 0.59 0.6 0.8
NQO1 1.8 1.6 2 0.5 0.49 0.547 1.34 1.2 1.1 1.11 1 0.9 1.1 1.07 1.06 0.8 0.6 0.7
RIP1 0.3 0.3 0 1.7 1.81 1.639 0.57 0.56 0.5 1.28 1.2 1 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.65 1.5 1.3
RIP3 0.3 0.3 0 1.5 1.68 1.691 0.57 0.64 0.5 1.05 1.1 1 0.78 1.04 0.84 1.42 1.5 1.2
MLKL 0.4 0.4 0 1.5 1.74 1.831 0.7 0.67 0.7 1.17 1.3 1.1 1.02 1.04 0.92 1.6 1.5 1.3

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 8.

The Data of Figure 3B

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
1 102.23 31.6572 71.7305 53.19949812 67.02055786 37.67976064
2 96.4386 26.87 72.3482 47.94903967 60.38027217 42.0036676
3 104.546 28.8775 62.6194 53.04507287 59.37650806 33.51027893
4 95.9753 30.5762 76.9038 45.86429881 68.33317247 37.52533539
5 98.9094 28.8775 76.981 48.10346492 67.7926841 37.67976064
6 105.472 29.2636 71.2673 44.39725895 65.16745488 34.12797992
7 95.5892 26.0979 69.1053 43.77955796 58.2183187 33.7419168
8 100.84 25.1713 64.0093 49.10722903 63.70041502 41.77202973

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 9.

The Data of Figure 4A

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
1 6.99 16.24 10.36 13.79 13.07 14.39
2 7.46 17.78 8.02 14.44 10.72 12.91
3 9.03 19.14 11.55 13.76 11.42 13.73

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 10.

The Data of Figure 4B

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
1 20.21 8.577 17.215 11.526 13.332 9.586
2 17.83 8.896 13.286 10.321 12.714 10.015
3 16.16 10.199 12.183 9.176 14.967 9.605

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 11.

The Data of Figure 4C

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
1 1.04 0.367 0.850 0.594 0.704 0.563
2 0.87 0.556 0.895 0.606 0.805 0.53
3 0.95 0.419 0.780 0.637 0.663 0.555

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 12.

The Data of Figure 4D

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
1 1.15 24.4 1.880 14.4 6.54 19.2
2 1.01 23.7 1.700 13.8 6.36 19
3 1.05 24.9 1.790 13.9 6.42 19.1

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Supplementary Table 13.

The Data of Inflammatory Factors in Figure 4E-G

Control MAFLD HNK HNK+Nrf2 inhibitor RIPK3 inhibitor Nrf2 inhibitor+ RIPK3 inhibitor
TNF-α 48.7 53.018 49.318 102.334 96.548 93.983 67.344 60.466 65.464 73.635 77.426 81.229 76.793 60.466 71.114 86.316 78.692 85.679
IL-1β 1.909 2.477 2.208 7.687 7.656 7.845 4.043 3.197 4.407 5.508 4.956 5.293 4.895 4.62 4.956 7.467 7.028 6.342
IL-6 3.161 3.06304 3.51481 8.452666 8.79446 9.025563 5.30041 4.52561 5.02628 6.59349 6.29202 6.15998 5.80309 5.48662 5.73919 8.8328 8.41505 7.71413

HNK, honokiol; MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Fuzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (2022-S-019).

Footnotes

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept – W.C., J.J.Z.; Design – W.C., J.J.Z.; Supervision – Z.D.C., J.J.Z.; Resources – C.H.L., J.J.Z.; Materials – W.C., X.J.L.; Data Collection and/or Processing – W.C., Y.C.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – W.C., Y.C.; Literature Search – W.C., Z.D.C.; Writing – W.C., J.J.Z.; Critical Review – Y.C., J.J.Z.

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1. Eslam M, Sanyal A, MAFLD GJ. A consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(7):1999-2014.e1. ( 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Heeren J, Scheja L. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and lipoprotein metabolism. Mol Metab. 2021;50:101238. ( 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101238) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Xu X, Poulsen KL, Wu L, et al. Targeted therapeutics and novel signaling pathways in non-alcohol-associated fatty liver/steatohepatitis (NAFL/NASH). Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):287. ( 10.1038/s41392-022-01119-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zhang J, Feng Q. Pharmacological effects and molecular protective mechanisms of astragalus polysaccharides on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:854674. ( 10.3389/fphar.2022.854674) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Liang Y, Chen H, Liu Y, et al. Association of MAFLD with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease: A 4.6-year cohort study in China. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(1):88 97. ( 10.1210/clinem/dgab641) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sezgin O, Akpınar H, Özer B, Törüner M, Bal K, Bor S. The abdominal ultrasonography results of Cappadocia cohort study of Turkey reveals high prevalence of fatty liver. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023;34(6):652 664. ( 10.5152/tjg.2023.23067) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rojas Á, Lara-Romero C, Muñoz-Hernández R, Gato S, Ampuero J, Romero-Gómez M. Emerging pharmacological treatment options for MAFLD. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2022;13:20420188221142452. ( 10.1177/20420188221142452) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mard SA, Savari F, Rezaie A, Khosravi M. Therapeutic effect of crocin on the NASH model by targeting the Fas receptor signaling pathway. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022;33(6):505 514. ( 10.5152/tjg.2022.21088) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chan MH, Chen HH, Lo YC, Wu SN. Magnolia OfficinalisEffectiveness in the block by honokiol, a dimerized allylphenol from, of hyperpolarization-activated cation Current and delayed-rectifier K Current. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12) ( 10.3390/ijms21124260) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rauf A, Olatunde A, Imran M, et al. Honokiol: a review of its pharmacological potential and therapeutic insights. Phytomedicine. 2021;90:153647. ( 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153647) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Munroe ME, Businga TR, Kline JN, Bishop GA. Anti-inflammatory effects of the neurotransmitter agonist honokiol in a mouse model of allergic asthma. J Immunol. Baltimore, MD. 2010;185(9):5586 5597. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.1000630) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zhou Y, Tang J, Lan J, et al. Honokiol alleviated neurodegeneration by reducing oxidative stress and improving mitochondrial function in mutant SOD1 cellular and mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13(2):577 597. ( 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lee AY, Christensen SM, Duong N, et al. Sirt3 pharmacologically promotes insulin sensitivity through PI3/AKT/mTOR and their downstream pathway in adipocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7) ( 10.3390/ijms23073740) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kataoka S, Umemura A, Okuda K, et al. Honokiol acts as a potent anti-fibrotic agent in the liver through inhibition of TGF-beta1/SMAD signaling and autophagy in hepatic stellate cells. Int J Mol Sci. 12 2021;22(24) ( 10.3390/ijms222413354) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lee YS, Jeong S, Kim KY, et al. Honokiol inhibits hepatoma carcinoma cell migration through downregulated cyclophilin B expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;552:44 51. ( 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Clare K, Dillon JF, Brennan PN. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of MAFLD. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022;10(5):939 946. ( 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00067) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Afonso MB, Rodrigues PM, Mateus-Pinheiro M, et al. RIPK3 acts as a lipid metabolism regulator contributing to inflammation and carcinogenesis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2021;70(12):2359 2372. ( 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321767) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang H, Zhou L, Zhou Y, et al. Intermittent hypoxia aggravates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via RIPK3-dependent necroptosis-modulated Nrf2/NFκB signaling pathway. Life Sci. 2021;285:119963. ( 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119963) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang SX, Yan JS, Chan YS. Advancements in MAFLD modeling with human cell and organoid models. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19) ( 10.3390/ijms231911850) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402 408. ( 10.1006/meth.2001.1262) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Badmus OO, Hillhouse SA, Anderson CD, Hinds TD, Stec DE. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): functional analysis of lipid metabolism pathways. Clin Sci (Lond). 2022;136(18):1347 1366. ( 10.1042/CS20220572) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bence KK, Birnbaum MJ. Metabolic drivers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Metab. 2021;50:101143. ( 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101143) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Alharthi J, Gastaldelli A, Cua IH, Ghazinian H, Eslam M. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a year in review. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022;38(3):251 260. ( 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000823) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Qu W, Ma T, Cai J, et al. Liver fibrosis and MAFLD: from molecular aspects to novel pharmacological strategies. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:761538. ( 10.3389/fmed.2021.761538) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Saha S, Buttari B, Panieri E, Profumo E, Saso L. An overview of Nrf2 signaling pathway and its role in inflammation. Molecules. 2020;25(22) ( 10.3390/molecules25225474) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Huang J, Zhang X, Yang X, et al. Baicalin exerts neuroprotective actions by regulating the Nrf2-NLRP3 axis in toxin-induced models of Parkinson’s disease. Chem Biol Interact. 2024;387:110820. ( 10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110820) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Baird L, Yamamoto M. The molecular mechanisms regulating the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;40(13) ( 10.1128/MCB.00099-20) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sajadimajd S, Khazaei M. Oxidative stress and cancer: the role of Nrf2. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2018;18(6):538 557. ( 10.2174/1568009617666171002144228) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhang Z, Qu J, Zheng C, et al. Nrf2 antioxidant pathway suppresses Numb-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition during pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):83. ( 10.1038/s41419-017-0198-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bukke VN, Moola A, Serviddio G, Vendemiale G, Bellanti F. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2-mediated signaling and metabolic associated fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(48):6909 6921. ( 10.3748/wjg.v28.i48.6909) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wang Y, Liu B, Wu P, et al. Dietary selenium alleviated mouse liver oxidative stress and NAFLD induced by obesity by regulating the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;11(2) ( 10.3390/antiox11020349) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zhai T, Xu W, Liu Y, Qian K, Xiong Y, Chen Y. Honokiol alleviates methionine-choline deficient diet-induced hepatic steatosis and oxidative stress in C57BL/6 mice by regulating CFLAR-JNK pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:2313641. ( 10.1155/2020/2313641) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhou Y, Jin H, Wu Y, Chen L, Bao X, Lu C. Gallic acid protects against ethanol-induced hepatocyte necroptosis via an NRF2-dependent mechanism. Toxicol In Vitro. 2019;57:226 232. ( 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.03.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Martens S, Bridelance J, Roelandt R, Vandenabeele P, Takahashi N. MLKL in cancer: more than a necroptosis regulator. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(6):1757 1772. ( 10.1038/s41418-021-00785-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tashkandi HM, Althagafy HS, Jaber FA, et al. Vinpocetine mitigates methotrexate-induced duodenal intoxication by modulating NF-kappaB, JAK1/STAT-3, and RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL signals. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2023:1 9. ( 10.1080/08923973.2023.2239491) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zhao J, Hu Y, Peng J. Targeting programmed cell death in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): a promising new therapy. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2021;26(1):17. ( 10.1186/s11658-021-00254-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hao MY, Sun LL, Sheng MW, et al. Berberine alleviates programmed necrosis of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease via activating Nrf2 pathway in mice. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi Zhonghua Ganzangbing Zazhi Chin J Hepatol. 2022;30(2):224 229. ( 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200910-00509) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology

RESOURCES