Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2024 Apr 12;9:194. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21117.1

The genome sequence of the Dracula fish, Danionella dracula (Britz, Conway & Rüber, 2009)

Lukas Rüber 1, Ralf Britz 2, Kevin Conway 3, Iliana Bista 4,5, Shane McCarthy 6, Jonathan Wood 6, Michelle Smith 6, Karen Oliver 6, Kerstin Howe 6,a, Richard Durbin 6,7
PMCID: PMC11367074  PMID: 39224769

Abstract

We present a genome assembly from an individual Danionella dracula (the Dracula fish; Chordata; Actinopterygii; Cypriniformes; Danionidae; Danioninae). The genome sequence is 665.21 megabases in span. This is a scaffold-level assembly, with a scaffold N50 of 10.29 Mb.

Keywords: Danionella dracula, Dracula fish; genome sequence, scaffold-level, Cypriniformes

Species taxonomy

Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Deuterostomia; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Actinopteri; Neopterygii; Teleostei; Osteoglossocephalai; Clupeocephala; Otomorpha; Ostariophysi; Otophysi; Cypriniphysae; Cypriniformes; Cyprinoidei; Danionidae; Danioninae; Danionella; Danionella dracula ( Britz et al., 2009)

Background

Danionella dracula ( Figure 1) is a miniature, transparent freshwater fish from streams around Sha Du Zup, Kachin State, in northern Myanmar with a maximum recorded size of 16.7 mm standard length ( Britz et al., 2009). It forms the sister group of the other four miniature species of Danionella: D. translucida ( Roberts, 1986), D. mirifica ( Britz, 2003), D. priapus ( Britz, 2009) and D. cerebrum ( Britz et al., 2021). Danionella dracula separated from its closest relatives about 29.5 mya ( Britz et al., 2009).

Figure 1. Image of Danionella dracula (Photograph by Ralf Britz).

Figure 1.

Danionella dracula has recently emerged as a model organism for neurophysiological research ( Tatarsky et al., 2022), along with D. cerebrum ( Schulze et al., 2018), previously misidentified as D. translucida ( Britz et al., 2021). A hybrid genome assembly for D. cerebrum has previously been published ( Kadobianskyi et al., 2019), and we complement this with publication of the D. dracula genome here.

Danionella dracula shows a number of highly unusual features that have been the prerequisite for its establishment as a neurophysiological model organism. The skeleton of Danionella dracula is characterised by loss and reduction of 61 bones, bone parts or cartilages ( Britz & Conway, 2016), including the frontals and parietals, which form the skull roof in other bony fishes. Danionella dracula is one of the most developmentally truncated fishes, meaning that its anatomy, with few exceptions, resembles that of a larval fish. This organism-wide progenetic condition has facilitated the evolution of several morphological novelties ( Britz & Conway, 2016), most of them sexually dimorphic. The most dramatic sexual dimorphic novelties involve its jaws, with large males developing tooth-like fangs, and its Weberian apparatus, in which males have hypertrophied elements and a bulbous drumming muscle and cartilage ( Britz et al., 2009; Britz & Conway, 2016). Both these character complexes are also exceptions to the organism-wide progenesis, and at least the well-developed Weberian apparatus is the result of striking heterochronic changes during the ontogeny of D. dracula ( Conway et al., 2021). While the development of most of the skeleton of D. dracula is delayed when compared to the zebrafish and other cypriniforms, that of the components of the Weberian apparatus is greatly accelerated resulting in a larval-looking fish with a well-developed Weberian apparatus used for hearing and sound production ( Conway et al., 2021). This highly unusual combination of an astonishingly transparent body, a reduced skeleton with no skull roof allowing immediate access to one of the smallest vertebrate brains, and a highly developed sound reception and production system combined with a complex behavioural repertoire have made this fish an attractive research subject.

Danionella dracula is a member of the Danioninae and a close relative of the zebrafish Danio rerio. The Danioninae are an emerging model clade in the field of evo-devo, favoured for analyses of anatomy (especially bone morphology and growth), pigmentation, gene family expansion and phylogeography ( Braasch et al., 2015; Parichy, 2015). Within the Danioninae Sequencing Project we are providing high quality genome assemblies for representatives of this clade to facilitate its use.

Genome sequence report

The specimen used for the study was obtained through the aquarium trade. The species naturally occurs in a stream near Sha Du Zup between Mogaung and Tanai, Myitkina district, Kachin State, northern Myanmar. A total of 41-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule continuous long reads (CLR) and 104-fold coverage in 10X Genomics read clouds were generated. The final assembly has a total length of 665.21 Mb in 996 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 10.29 Mb ( Table 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 2. Genome assembly of Danionella dracula, fDanDra1.1: metrics.

Figure 2.

The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 665,208,374 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (39,982,851 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (10,287,669 and 757,246 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the actinopterygii_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/fDanDra1.1/dataset/UELW01/snail.

Figure 3. Genome assembly of Danionella dracula, fDanDra1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.

Figure 3.

Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/fDanDra1.1/dataset/UELW01/blob.

Figure 4. Genome assembly of Danionella dracula, fDanDra1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.

Figure 4.

The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/fDanDra1.1/dataset/UELW01/cumulative.

Table 1. Genome data for Danionella dracula, fDanDra1.1.

Project accession data
Assembly identifier fDanDra1.1
Species Danionella dracula
Specimen fDanDra1
NCBI taxonomy ID 623740
BioProject PRJEB27320
BioSample ID SAMEA104026433
Isolate information fDanDra1
Assembly metrics
Consensus quality (QV) 34.6
k-mer completeness 98.97%
BUSCO * C:90.3%[S:87.9%,D:2.4%],F:0.7%,M:9.0%,n:3,640
Raw data accessions
PacificBiosciences CLR ERR2639734–ERR2639748
10X Genomics Illumina ERR2639753–ERR2639756
Genome assembly
Assembly accession GCA_900490495.1
Span (Mb) 665.21
Number of contigs 1,611
Contig N50 length (Mb) 2.3
Number of scaffolds 996
Scaffold N50 length
(Mb)
10.3
Longest scaffold (Mb) 40

* BUSCO scores based on the actinopterygii_odb10 BUSCO set using v5.3.2. C = complete [S = single copy, D = duplicated], F = fragmented, M = missing, n = number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/fDanDra1.1/dataset/UELW01/busco.

The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 34.6 with k-mer completeness of 98.97%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 90.3% (single = 87.9%, duplicated = 2.4%), using the actinopterygii_odb10 reference set ( n = 3,640).

Metadata for spectra estimates and sequencing runs can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/623740.

Methods

Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction

The Danionella dracula specimen used for the genome assembly (BioSample ID SAMEA104026433, individual fDanDra1), was obtained from the laboratory of Ralf Britz. Individuals of D. dracula were maintained in an aquarium with the dimensions 80×40×40 cm and fed with brine shrimp nauplii. Specimens were euthanised with an overdose of MS222. Tissue was flash-frozen on dry ice. Two different DNA extraction methods were applied for the fDanDra1 sample. DNA was then extracted from head tissue using a modified version of the MagAttract protocol to increase the yield. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.

Sequencing

Pacific Biosciences circular consensus and 10X Genomics read cloud DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL (CLR) and HiSeqX (10X) instruments.

Genome assembly, curation and evaluation

The assembly fDanDra1.1 is based on PacBio Sequel data, and Illumina HiSeqX data generated from a 10X Genomics Chromium library. An initial PacBio assembly was made using Falcon-unzip ( Chin et al., 2016). The primary contigs were first scaffolded using a wtdbg ( Ruan & Li, 2020) assembly as a synteny guide, then scaffolded further using the 10X data with scaff10x. After using the PacBio data to gap fill with PBJelly ( English et al., 2012) and polishing with Arrow, the assembly was polished again using the 10X Illumina data and FreeBayes ( Garrison & Marth, 2012). Retained haplotigs were identified with purge_haplotigs ( Roach et al., 2018). Finally, the assembly was manually assessed using gEVAL ( Chow et al., 2016).

To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.

Table 2 lists the relevant software tool versions and sources.

Table 2. Software tools: versions and sources.

Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance

The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Tree of Life collaborator. The Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:

•   Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material

•   Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international).

Each transfer of samples is undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Tree of Life collaborator, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute) and in some circumstances other Tree of Life collaborators.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Wellcome through core funding to the Wellcome Sanger Institute [207492, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/207492>https://doi.org/10.35802/207492</a>].

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Data availability

European Nucleotide Archive: Dracula fish Danionella dracula genome assembly fDanDra1.1. Accession number PRJEB27320; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB27320 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2018). The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Danionella dracula genome sequencing initiative is part of the Vertebrate Genomes Project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.

References

  1. Braasch I, Peterson SM, Desvignes T, et al. : A new model army: Emerging fish models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2015;324(4):316–41. 10.1002/jez.b.22589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Britz R: Danionella mirifica, a new species of miniature fish from upper Myanmar (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae). Ichthyol Explor Freshw. 2003;14(3). Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  3. Britz R: Danionella priapus, a new species of miniature cyprinid fish from West Bengal, India (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Zootaxa. 2009;2277(1). 10.11646/zootaxa.2277.1.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Britz R, Conway KW: Danionella dracula, an escape from the cypriniform Bauplan via developmental truncation? J Morphol. 2016;277(2):147–66. 10.1002/jmor.20486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Britz R, Conway KW, Rüber L: Spectacular morphological novelty in a miniature cyprinid fish, Danionella dracula n. sp. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276(1665):2179–2186. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Britz R, Conway KW, Rüber L: The emerging vertebrate model species for neurophysiological studies is Danionella cerebrum, new species (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Sci Rep. 2021;11(1): 18942. 10.1038/s41598-021-97600-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Challis R, Richards E, Rajan J, et al. : BlobToolKit – interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g3.119.400908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chin CS, Peluso P, Sedlazeck FJ, et al. : Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat Methods. 2016;13(12):1050–1054. 10.1038/nmeth.4035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chow W, Brugger K, Caccamo M, et al. : gEVAL — a web-based browser for evaluating genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(16):2508–2510. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Conway KW, Kubicek KM, Britz R: Extreme evolutionary shifts in developmental timing establish the miniature Danionella as a novel model in the neurosciences. Dev Dyn. 2021;250(4):601–611. 10.1002/dvdy.280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, et al. : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. English AC, Richards S, Han Y, et al. : Mind the gap: upgrading genomes with pacific biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS One. 2012;7(11): e47768. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garrison E, Marth G: Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. 2012; [Accessed 26 July 2023]. Reference Source
  14. Kadobianskyi M, Schulze L, Schuelke M, et al. : Hybrid genome assembly and annotation of Danionella translucida. Sci Data. 2019;6(1): 156. 10.1038/s41597-019-0161-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, et al. : BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(10):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Parichy DM: Advancing biology through a deeper understanding of zebrafish ecology and evolution. eLife. 2015;4: e05635. 10.7554/eLife.05635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rhie A, Walenz BP, Koren S, et al. : Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1): 245. 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roach MJ, Schmidt SA, Borneman AR: Purge haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(1): 460. 10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roberts TR: Danionella translucida, a new genus and species of cyprinid fish from Burma, one of the smallest living vertebrates. Environ Biol Fish. 1986;16(4):231–241. 10.1007/BF00842977 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruan J, Li H: Fast and accurate long-read assembly with wtdbg2. Nat Methods. 2020;17(2):155–158. 10.1038/s41592-019-0669-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schulze L, Henninger J, Kadobianskyi M, et al. : Transparent Danionella translucida as a genetically tractable vertebrate brain model. Nat Methods. 2018;15(11):977–983. 10.1038/s41592-018-0144-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, et al. : BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(19):3210–3212. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Surana P, Muffato M, Qi G: sanger-tol/readmapping: sanger-tol/readmapping v1.1.0 - Hebridean Black (1.1.0). Zenodo. 2023a. 10.5281/zenodo.7755669 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Surana P, Muffato M, Sadasivan Baby C: sanger-tol/genomenote (v1.0.dev). Zenodo. 2023b. 10.5281/zenodo.6785935 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tatarsky RL, Guo Z, Campbell SC, et al. : Acoustic and postural displays in a miniature and transparent teleost fish, Danionella dracula. J Exp Biol. 2022;225(16): jeb244585. 10.1242/jeb.244585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the Dracula fish, Danionella dracula, (Britz, Conway & Rüber, 2009). European Nucleotide Archive, [dataset], accession number PRJEB27320.2018.
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23357.r93348

Reviewer response for version 1

Kathryn Elmer 1

This resource is developed for a fish that is of considerable interest for the basis of its developmental  and morphological features and as a neurophysiological model. 

The reference genome is well described and clearly presented. There is logical flow and appropriate level of detail. The  approaches applied are well motivated and sufficiently comprehensive for the purpose of releasing this useful resource. I have no further requests for clarification and I look forward to seeing this taken up by the community

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

evolutionary biology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Sep 1. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23357.r93356

Reviewer response for version 1

Chenhong Li 1

Dracula fish is a interesting fish the only one with fangs in carp species. The data generated are very useful. All analyses and information extraction were done appropriately. The species itself is unique. The genome resource data collected here will be valuable to further investigate this creature and to serve the purpose of using it as a model organism.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Phylogenetics, comparative genomics, fish

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Jul 30. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23357.r88235

Reviewer response for version 1

Rohit Kolora 1

In the manuscript titled "The genome sequence of the Dracula fish, Danionella dracula ( Britz, Conway & Rüber, 2009)" by Rüber et al. the authors sequenced and assembled a scaffold-level genome of Dracula fish. They describe the importance of this resource as a model of neurophysiological research, and improve the genome quality compared to the previously published hybrid assembly. The manuscript is well written and the authors provide most relevant details. The workflow for the assembly assessment is cited including the list of tools/software for the assembly. However, the code/scripts used to generate the actual assembly is missing in the references and availability statement. It would be of great help to the research community for reproducibility if these details (data-specific parameters) can be provided through relevant Zenodo/Git repositories. If default parameters were used for all the tools, please mention it specifically in the methods section.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

No

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Genomics, Bioinformatics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the Dracula fish, Danionella dracula, (Britz, Conway & Rüber, 2009). European Nucleotide Archive, [dataset], accession number PRJEB27320.2018.

    Data Availability Statement

    European Nucleotide Archive: Dracula fish Danionella dracula genome assembly fDanDra1.1. Accession number PRJEB27320; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB27320 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2018). The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Danionella dracula genome sequencing initiative is part of the Vertebrate Genomes Project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES