Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2024 Aug 7;12(9):e00714-24. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00714-24

Multiplexed CRISPR-Cas system targeting ASFV genes in vivo: solution lies within

Mengjia Zhang 1, Yifei Lang 2, Wentao Li 1,
Editor: Clinton J Jones3
PMCID: PMC11370621  PMID: 39109857

ABSTRACT

The emergence and spread of the African swine fever virus (ASFV) posed a significant threat to the global swine breeding industry, calling for innovative approaches benefiting viral containment and control. A recent study (Z. Zheng, L. Xu, H. Dou, Y. Zhou, X., et al., Microbiol Spectr 12: e02164-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02164-23) established a multiplexed CRISPR-Cas system targeting the genome of ASFV and tested the consequent antiviral activity both in vitro and in vivo. Application of this system showed a significant reduction of viral replication in vitro, while the germline-edited pigs expressing this system exhibited normal growth with continuous guide RNA expression. Although no survival advantage was observed upon ASFV challenge compared with nonengineered pigs, this marks the first attempt of germline editing to pursue ASFV resistance and paves the way for future disease-resistant animal breeding approaches utilizing CRISPR-Cas technology.

KEYWORDS: African swine fever virus, genome editing, genetically engineered pigs, disease-resistant pigs

COMMENTARY

African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious and deadly viral disease affecting both domestic and wild pigs. ASF is now confirmed to have an expanding distribution across at least 80 countries, in which resides more than 80% of the world’s total swine population. Despite the century-long prevalence history of ASF, the current situation pressingly demands effective prevention and control strategies, namely, the development of efficient vaccines and effective antiviral drugs. The complexity of the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), the causative agent of ASF, is proven to be the major obstacle affecting the development of antiviral intervention strategies. ASFV particles have a complex 5-layer structure and a large DNA genome encoding more than 160 proteins, most of which still lack proper elucidation of their biological properties and functions (1, 2). Among the proteins that were characterized, researchers identified and confirmed large numbers of functional overlaps between them. The existence of such mechanisms could directly lead to robust immune evasion or immune suppression capabilities of the virus, which hinders viral protein-targeting antiviral interventions (36). In addition, the ASFV also exploits multiple complex infection mechanisms such as hijacking the cellular efferocytosis pathway and makes use of the generated apoptotic bodies for efficient cell-to-cell transmission (7), which have almost shut the door on the development of vaccine candidates following the traditional methodologies.

The fight against the ASFV demands immediate application of innovative antiviral approaches, especially those de novo techniques which were initially considered irrelevant, complicated, or interdisciplinary. To this end, Zheng et al. set out to explore the potential of multiplexed CRISPR-Cas systems against ASFV infection (8). The viral genome of the ASFV is a linear DNA molecule that replicates within the host cell during viral infection, making it vulnerable to guide RNA-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 hydrolysis, which could also become more efficient if the system is already equipped by the host. The researchers first designed a multiplex CRISPR-Cas system targeting several loci within the ASFV genome, which shall fragment the viral DNA and render it nonfunctional. The designed system was then integrated into the genome of COS-7 cells, while infection experiments indicated that ASFV replication was significantly reduced in cell clones with higher levels of Cas9 expression. Meanwhile, based on the in vitro findings, the authors integrated the same system into pig cells and henceforth generated transgenic pigs. The transgenic animals had optimal growth properties and could maintain Cas9 expression throughout the experiment. Unfortunately, the multiplex CRISPR-Cas system did not maintain noticeable antiviral effects in vivo, as those transgenic pigs did not show enhanced resistance to ASFV infection in comparison with the wild-type pigs during the virus challenge experiment. Differing from in vitro infection models, the integrated system under in vivo conditions has complicated and often unknown obstacles, such as the fully functional immune system and other host factors. Various possibilities that cause incompetency of the Cas9 enzyme might occur, leading to partial or complete incapacitation. Nevertheless, as a valuable first attempt, this study managed to successfully express a complex ASFV-resistant CRISPR-Cas system in pigs and shed light on future researches with alternative settings of the same approach.

Currently, with the rapid development and innovation of gene-editing technology, disease-resistant breeding has progressively become an important resource to prevent and control viral diseases, which can limit the occurrence of diseases by inhibition of viruses from initiating a positive infection. Genetically modified organism (GMO) plants, such as soybeans and corns with various disease-resistant characteristics, have been widely used in the food industry. Less than a decade ago, Whitworth et al. used the CRISPR-Cas9 method to generate pigs lacking functional CD163, the receptor of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), and the gene-edited pigs showed no fever or respiratory signs, lung pathology, viremia, or antibody response and remained healthy post virus challenge (9). Building upon this study, Xu et al. have produced CD163 and pAPN double-knockout pigs, which showed resistance to PRRSV and Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus, while having limited susceptibility to porcine deltacoronavirus, an emerging zoonotic coronaviral pathogen discovered in 2012 (10). Researchers have also used gene-editing technology to produce the first calf resistant to bovine viral diarrhea virus (11), a major viral disease that costs the U.S. cattle sector billions of dollars each year. The first gene-edited swine breed for commercial usage with PRRS-resistant characteristics is also on the way to mass production (12). Could there be an ASFV-resistant swine breed in the future? Zheng et al. make a first valuable attempt and inspired a vast possibility for this aspect. There will still be challenges, including insurance of the safety and efficacy of GMO animals with thorough ethical considerations. The ongoing research in this field holds promise for developing sustainable strategies to enhance animal health and welfare while preventing the spread of infectious diseases, especially those high contagious and lethal viral diseases currently posing threats to the field.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Work in the laboratory of prof. Wentao Li is partially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFF1000900).

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

Contributor Information

Wentao Li, Email: wentao@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Clinton J. Jones, Oklahoma State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wang N, Zhao D, Wang J, Zhang Y, Wang M, Gao Y, Li F, Wang J, Bu Z, Rao Z, Wang X. 2019. Architecture of African swine fever virus and implications for viral assembly. Science 366:640–644. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wang Y, Kang W, Yang W, Zhang J, Li D, Zheng H. 2021. Structure of African swine fever virus and associated molecular mechanisms underlying infection and immunosuppression: a review. Front Immunol 12:715582. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.715582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Li D, Yang W, Li L, Li P, Ma Z, Zhang J, Qi X, Ren J, Ru Y, Niu Q, Liu Z, Liu X, Zheng H. 2021. African swine fever virus MGF-505-7R negatively regulates cGAS-STING-mediated signaling pathway. J Immunol 206:1844–1857. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li J, Song J, Kang L, Huang L, Zhou S, Hu L, Zheng J, Li C, Zhang X, He X, Zhao D, Bu Z, Weng C. 2021. pMGF505-7R determines pathogenicity of African swine fever virus infection by inhibiting IL-1β and type I IFN production. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009733. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhang K, Yang B, Shen C, Zhang T, Hao Y, Zhang D, Liu H, Shi X, Li G, Yang J, Li D, Zhu Z, Tian H, Yang F, Ru Y, Cao WJ, Guo J, He J, Zheng H, Liu X. 2022. MGF360-9L is a major virulence factor associated with the African swine fever virus by antagonizing the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. mBio 13:e0233021. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02330-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cheng MY, Luo JW, Duan YT, Yang Y, Shi CW, Sun Y, Lu YY, Wang JH, Li XX, Wang JZ, Wang N, Yang WT, Jiang YL, Yang GL, Zeng Y, Wang CF, Cao X. 2022. African swine fever virus MGF505-3R inhibits cGAS-STING-mediated IFN-β pathway activation by degrading TBK1. Anim Dis 2. doi: 10.1186/s44149-022-00046-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gao P, Zhou L, Wu J, Weng W, Wang H, Ye M, Qu Y, Hao Y, Zhang Y, Ge X, Guo X, Han J, Yang H. 2023. Riding apoptotic bodies for cell-cell transmission by African swine fever virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120:e2309506120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309506120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zheng Z, Xu L, Gao Y, Dou H, Zhou Y, Feng X, He X, Tian Z, Song L, Mo G, Hu J, Zhao H, Wei H, Church GM, Yang L. 2024. Testing multiplexed anti-ASFV CRISPR-Cas9 in reducing African swine fever virus. Microbiol Spectr 12:e0216423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02164-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Whitworth KM, Rowland RRR, Ewen CL, Trible BR, Kerrigan MA, Cino-Ozuna AG, Samuel MS, Lightner JE, McLaren DG, Mileham AJ, Wells KD, Prather RS. 2016. Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Nat Biotechnol 34:20–22. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Xu K, Zhou Y, Mu Y, Liu Z, Hou S, Xiong Y, Fang L, Ge C, Wei Y, Zhang X, Xu C, Che J, Fan Z, Xiang G, Guo J, Shang H, Li H, Xiao S, Li J, Li K. 2020. CD163 and pAPN double-knockout pigs are resistant to PRRSV and TGEV and exhibit decreased susceptibility to PDCoV while maintaining normal production performance. Elife 9:e57132. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Workman AM, Heaton MP, Vander Ley BL, Webster DA, Sherry L, Bostrom JR, Larson S, Kalbfleisch TS, Harhay GP, Jobman EE, Carlson DF, Sonstegard TS. 2023. First gene-edited calf with reduced susceptibility to a major viral pathogen. PNAS Nexus 2:gad125. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Burger BT, Beaton BP, Campbell MA, Brett BT, Rohrer MS, Plummer S, Barnes D, Jiang K, Naswa S, Lange J, et al. 2024. Generation of a commercial-scale founder population of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus resistant pigs using CRISPR-Cas. CRISPR J 7:12–28. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2023.0061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES