Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Aug 3;16(8):e66100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66100

Assessment of Stress and Anxiety in Parents of Neonates Admitted in a Tertiary Care Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

Aayushi Joshi 1, Bindu Agarwal 2, Vasu Saini 2, Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji 3,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11370969  PMID: 39229424

Abstract

Background

A newborn’s admission into the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is one unexpected event capable of causing much stress and anxiety among parents. The current study aims to evaluate and compare parental stress and anxiety levels between mothers and fathers.

Methodology

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the NICU of a tertiary care center, in Uttarakhand where a total of 306 mothers and fathers were enrolled. Data was compiled using a questionnaire consisting of demographic details of parents and infants' clinical profiles, Parental Stressor Scale (PSS) NICU, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scales were used to evaluate stress and anxiety, respectively.

Results

Mothers mean stress levels were greater and statistically significant. The most affected subscale in both parents was the change in parental role (M: 4.4/F: 3.3; p < 0.001). Parents with high trait anxiety also had high state anxiety (M: 51.3/F: 45.5; p < 0.001). Mothers were found to have higher trait and state anxiety than fathers.

Conclusion

Parents of newborns admitted in the NICU experience significant stress and anxiety. Mothers had higher levels of stress and anxiety; similar findings have been recorded previously in Indian and western literature.

Keywords: experience in critical care, newborn, state trait anxiety inventory, neonatal intensive unit, parental stress

Introduction

Admission of a newborn into the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is one experience that has the potential of causing a significant amount of mental trauma, stress, and anxiety to parents as the prospects of a healthy infant are shattered by the shock of being separated from the newborn due to NICU admission [1-4]. The NICU's dense environment and an infant's sensitivity and fragility might create barriers to parenting that can have a detrimental effect on parent-infant bonding, which is the cornerstone of a lifetime relationship [5]. 

Preterm, severely unwell, and other high-risk newborns who had little hope in life are now more likely to survive because of new developments in neonatal intensive care and high-tech healthcare. More parents are exposed to the NICU setting and its range of stresses as smaller and sicker infants survive [6]. Parental stress is a well-researched and extensively debated topic in Western literature. Because of the high birth rate in India, NICU staff members are overworked and have less time to address parental concerns and psychological interventions to help reduce anxiety. Using the Parental Stressor Scale (PSS) NICU scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the stress and anxiety levels of parents of newborns receiving NICU care were measured and compared in this study.

The aim of this study is to assess the psychological well-being of parents whose newborns are admitted to the NICU. The objectives of the research are threefold. First, it seeks to evaluate the level of stress that parents experience when their infants are admitted to the neonatal critical care unit. Second, the study aims to gauge the level of anxiety these parents feel during their newborns NICU stay. Finally, it intends to compare the levels of stress and anxiety experienced by fathers and mothers, providing a comprehensive understanding of how each parent is affected by this challenging situation.

Materials and methods

Study design, study period, and study participants

The current cross-sectional study was carried out over 17 months, from June 2021 to October 2022, at the NICU of SMIH Hospital, a tertiary care facility in Dehradun, Uttarakhand. After obtaining informed consent, 306 mothers and fathers and 612 parents were registered. Following the newborn's admission and at least three days of exposure to the NICU setting, parents were questioned. The STAI scale, created by Spielberger in 1970, was used to examine anxiety levels, while Miles's PSS NICU scale was used to measure stress levels and gather information about the clinical profile and demographics of the infants.

Study procedure and data collection

The assessment of parental stress and anxiety was done using the PSS NICU and STAI scales, respectively. The interview of the parents of the newborn was held in a private room within the NICU. Assessment for stress and anxiety was done at least three days after NICU admission and was completed in 30-45 minutes. The collected data was recorded in a centralized sheet for analysis. The data for this study was collected under three sections. 

Section A

It included the parent's sociodemographic information (age, religion, place of residence, type of family, level of education, employment, number of children, and prior experience with a NICU hospitalization).

Section B

It consisted of the neonate's clinical profile obtained from NICU medical records (day of life; sex; mode of delivery; period of gestation; appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score at birth; birth weight; the reason for hospitalization; and presence of various treatment interventions like radiant warmers, intravenous fluids, sedation, inotropes, lines, drains, ventilators, nasogastric or orogastric tubes, oxygen support, and phototherapy)

Section C

It consists of the printed PSS NICU and STAI scale questionnaire. There are 45 items in the PSS NICU scale, broken into four subscales. Every PSS NICU subscale response was graded using a five-point Likert scale. Points 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on the scale indicated as no stress at all, little stress, moderate stress, considerable stress, and severe stress, respectively. After calculating the overall mean score, greater mean values indicated higher stress levels. The PSS NICU scale was scored as follows: looks and behaves = 0-95; parental role = 0-50; sights and sounds = 0-25; and staff communication = 0-55. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of stress. The scores range from 0 to 225. The mean value cutoff > 2.9 was used to determine the substantial stress levels [7].

The STAI is the second scale employed in this research. The 20 statements on the STAI assist in identifying situational or present anxiety. People use the scale to indicate their feelings at any given time. The four-point scale, which goes from "not at all" to "somewhat," "moderately so," to "very much so," represents the strength of a sensation on a scale of 1 to 4, respectively. 

The 20-item STAI measure indicates a person's overall propensity to worry in anxious situations. On a four-point rating scale, participants must indicate how frequently they occur, ranging from "almost never" to "sometimes" and "often" to "almost always." Scores ranging from 20 to 80 were observed for mothers' and dads' state and trait anxiety, respectively. Higher scores represent a parent's higher level of anxiety. The mean scores were used to determine anxiety, with trait scores exceeding the 44-point cutoff and state scores exceeding the 41-point cutoff being deemed significant [6].

Inclusion Criteria 

Parents of newborns admitted to NICU during the study period who were hospitalized for at least three days and whose parents visited the newborn at least once during the course of their stay in NICU were eligible to participate in the study after giving written informed consent. 

Exclusion Criteria

Parents with multiple newborns (multiple births) admitted to NICU, infants with congenital anomalies, orphans and medicolegal babies, minor mothers less than 18 years of age, parents with marital discord, cognitive impairment, chronic drug addictions, psychiatric illness, and any chronic or systemic illness were excluded from the study.

Ethical consideration and statistical analysis

Ethical committee approval was obtained for the study. Parents' information was gathered through an interview using a structured questionnaire created with MS Word and MS Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States). A software called IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used to perform the statistical analysis. A p-value of less than 0.5 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

In the study population, the average age of mothers was 25.4 years, whereas the average age of fathers was 29.7 years. The study's newborns had a mean birth weight of 2.2 kg, a gestational age of 35 weeks, and an APGAR score of 6.5 at one minute of birth. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the details of the infant's clinical profile and demographics.

Table 1. Description of the demographic profile of infants.

Sociodemographic variables n (306) n (%)
Religion    
Hindu 225 73.5%
Muslim 63 20.5%
Others 18 5.8%
Residence    
Uttarakhand 241 78.7%
Uttar pradesh 27 8.8%
Others 38 12.3%
Locality    
Urban 221 72.3%
Rural 85 27.7%
Type of family    
Joint 108 35.2%
Nuclear 198 64.8%
Education of mother    
Illiterate 0 0%
Primary 101 32.9%
Secondary/above 205 67.1%
Occupation of mother    
Professional/clerical 72 23.7%
Skilled/semi-skilled labor class 234 76.2%
Occupation of father    
Professional/clerical 146 47.7%
Skilled/semi skilled labor class 160 52.3%
Gravida    
Primigravida 62 20%
Multigravida 245 80%

Table 2. Description of infant clinical data.

PICC: Peripherally inserted central catheter; UVC: umbilical vein catheter

Infants' profile n n(%)
Sex    
Male 192 62.9%
Female 114 37.1%
Gestation    
Term 151 49.3%
Preterm 155 50.7%
Birth weight    
Appropriate for gestational age 220 71.7%
Small for gestational age 77 25.1%
Large for gestational age 5 1.6%
Mode of delivery    
Normal vaginal delivery 180 58.8%
Lower segment cesarean section 126 41.2%
Treatment intervention    
Radiant warmer 306 100%
Intravenous fluids 284 92.8%
Oxygen support 201 65.6%
Orogastric or nasogastric tubes 239 78.1%
PICC/UVC line 180 58.8%
Respiratory support 159 51.9%
Sedatives 67 21.8%
Catheters 58 18.9%
Phototherapy 47 15.3%
Inotropes 22 7.1%
Drains 8 2.6%
Reason for hospitalization    
Prematurity 155 50.4%
Respiratory insufficiency 119 47%
Sepsis 41 13.3%
Birth asphyxia 39 12.7%
Neonatal jaundice 38 12.3%
Shock 15 4.8%
Others 46 15%

Table 3 and Table 4 show the different PSS NICU components and the associated parental stress scores. The population's stress levels were assessed by taking the mean stress score over all four subscales, with a cutoff value of 2.9. 

Table 3. Comparison between the stress levels of mothers and fathers in various PSS NICU subscales.

PSS: Parental Stressor Scale; NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval

PSS NICU scale Mother mean (SD)   Father mean (SD) % with significant stress 95% CI of mean difference p-value
% with significant stress Lower Upper
Sights and sounds 3.34 (0.899) 2.79 (0.884) 0.40678 0.68995 <0.001
68.9% 52.2%
Baby looks and behaves 1.68 (0.627) 1.651 (0.419) -.05263 .11696 0.457
2.9% 3.2%
Parental role 4.426 (0.313) 3.332 (0.489) 1.0288 2.2696 <0.001
100% 90.1%
Staff behavior and communication 0.009 (0.034) 0.002 (0.014) 0.00324 0.01161 0.001
0% 0%
Total PSS NICU score 9.46 (1.352) 7.78 (1.187) 1.4799 1.8842 <0.001

Table 4. Evaluation of total anxiety and comparison of anxiety between mothers and fathers in the study population.

STAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; Df: degree of freedom

STAI SCALE Mother mean (SD) % with significant anxiety Father mean (SD) % with significant anxiety 95% CI of mean difference     p-value
Lower Upper T Df
Trait 44.56 (9.6) 39.9 (8.3) 3.185 6.057 6.318 597.4 <0.001
67.3% 45%
State 51.30 (10.8) 45.51 (8.4) 4.252 7.330   7.390 575.43 <0.001
76.4% 55.8%

Mothers had statistically significant stress levels with higher mean values (p < 0.001) as compared to fathers (mothers: 9.46/7.78). Maximum scores in both parents were obtained in alteration in parental role (mothers: 4.4/fathers: 3.3) where 100% of mothers had significant stress scores in contrast to 90% of fathers. It was followed by sights and sounds subscale (mothers: 3.3/fathers: 2.7) which caused significant stress in over 68.9% of mothers and 52.2% of fathers. 

The subscale most affected was parental role alteration in both the parents which was significant (p < 0.001). Maternal stress was significant in all subscales expect one (baby looks and behaves: p = 0.457) where fathers were found be to as stress as mothers (equal mean scores, mothers: 1.6). 

To calculate significant anxiety, the mean scores were calculated in both state and trait anxiety (cutoff scores for trait, >44; for state, >41 were taken) as depicted in Table 4. Mothers had significantly higher state and trait anxiety scores (mothers: 51.3/44.5; fathers: 45.5/39.9).

It was found that 67.3% of mothers had significant trait anxiety (baseline anxiety) in contrast to 45% of fathers. A total of 76.4% of mothers had state anxiety (situational anxiety) as compared to 55.8% of fathers. Also, parents with increased trait anxiety had greater state anxiety as well, since they had higher probability to worry in anxiety prone situations (p < 0.001).

Discussion

The branch of neonatology has grown and advanced over decades. New treatment modalities and interventions have given parents of premature, extremely low-birth-weight babies and other sick infants a beacon of hope. However, with advances in the medical field as more newborns are admitted in the NICU, more parents get exposed to NICU environment and its various stressors, which has been an area of neglect since years. It is crucial for doctors and NICU staff to try to identify the stressors and to mitigate their effects. Miles in 1992 described that NICU admission of a newborn is a life-altering event for the parents. Studies done on this subject are well-documented and reviewed in Western literature; however, few Indian studies are done pertaining to parental stress and anxiety in NICU. This is the first study done in the state of Uttarakhand in Northern India. 

The current results demonstrate that parents of newborns admitted to the NICU had considerable levels of stress, which is consistent with earlier research on parental stress. The results correspond with previous studies [8-11], where moms reported greater stress levels than fathers (mothers: 9.46/fathers: 7.78, with p-value: 0.001). The four different subscales of PSS NICU scale were assessed. The highest scores in the current study for both parents were in subscale parental role alteration (mothers: 4.4/fathers: 3.33), followed by sights and sounds (mothers: 3.34/fathers: 2.79); baby looks and behaves (mothers: 1.68/fathers: 1.65), and staff communication (mothers: 0.09/fathers: 0.03). 

Maximum stress scores for both parents were obtained in subscale parental role alteration in the present study (mothers: 4.4/fathers: 3.3); similar findings were found by various researchers throughout history [9,11-13]. The first Indian study in 2012 by Chourasia, demonstrated that stress scores were highest for parental role alteration followed by looks and behavior of the baby and sights and sounds [7,8,11,12,14,15]. Not only the mothers but both parents were found to have significant stress scores in parental role alteration subscale (p < 0.001), meaning that it’s not only the mothers who are affected by the hospitalization and separation of the newborn, but paternal role is crucial for maintaining family function and stability during infants' NICU admission. It is to be known that all study on fathers has only occurred over the last one decade, before which fathers were the forgotten parent in stress evaluation in PSS NICU. 

The second scale most affected in the current study was found to be sights and sounds (mothers M: 3.3/fathers M: 2.79, p < 0.001) which caused significant stress (M > 2.9) in 68.9% of mothers and 52.2% of fathers. Followed by baby looks and behaves (mother M: 1.68/father M: 1.65), it is to be noted that mothers had higher stress scores in all PSS NICU subscales except baby looks and behaves where both the parents had equal scores (M: 1.6, similar stress levels) meaning fathers were as stressed as mothers. Similar results were noted in many studies [10,16].

In the current study, the subscale causing the least stress was staff behavior and communication; similar findings are reflected universally in all other studies [7,13,17-19]. Parental anxiety regarding the well-being, safety, and security of a child is an inevitable part of parenting. Similar to other studies, in the present study, mothers reported higher trait anxiety (baseline anxiety) scores than fathers (mother M: 44.5/ fathers M: 39.9 with p-value < 0.001). It was found that 67.3% of mothers had high trait anxiety (above cutoff level of >41) as compared to 45% of fathers [20,21]. Parents with higher trait scores were also found to have statistically significant state scores (situational anxiety) (mothers M: 51.3/fathers M: 45.5).

These results indicate that the anxiety experienced by the parents in specific anxiety prone circumstances (measured by STATE scores) is affected by the general tendency to worry (measured by TRAIT scores). Results fell in line with previous literature where high state anxiety was found in NICU parents [16].

Conclusions

Significant levels of stress were observed in the parents of infants hospitalized in the NICU. According to the PSS NICU scale, mothers experienced higher levels of stress than fathers. Previous research has reported similar results in both Indian and Western literature. Change in parental role was the parental PSS NICU stress score subscale that was most impacted for both parents (mother: 4.4/father: 3.3 with p < 0.001). According to the STAI scale, mothers showed higher trait anxiety levels than fathers. Higher state anxiety scores (mother: 51.3/father: 45.5 with p < 0.001) were also seen in parents with higher trait anxiety ratings; substantial state anxiety was seen in 55.8% of fathers and 76.4% of mothers.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee issued approval SGRR/IEC//64/21. Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Ethics Committee issued approval with approval number SGRR/IEC//64/21. This approval has been granted on the assumption that the proposed research work will be carried out in accordance with the ethical guidelines prescribed by the Central Ethics Committee on Human Research.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji, Aayushi Joshi, Bindu Agarwal, Vasu Saini

Drafting of the manuscript:  Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji, Aayushi Joshi, Bindu Agarwal, Vasu Saini

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji, Aayushi Joshi, Vasu Saini

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Aayushi Joshi

References

  • 1.Assessing parental stress in intensive care units. Miles MS, Carter MC. https://journals.lww.com/mcnjournal/citation/1983/09000/assessing_parental_stress_in_intensive_care_units.14.aspx Am J Mat Ch Nur. 1983;8:354–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Family support and family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit: origins, advances, impact. Gooding JS, Cooper LG, Blaine AI, Franck LS, Howse JL, Berns SD. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35:20–28. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parenting stress in mothers after very preterm birth and the effect of the infant behavioural assessment and intervention program. Meijssen DE, Wolf MJ, Koldewijn K, van Wassenaer AG, Kok JH, van Baar AL. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37:195–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Very preterm birth influences parental mental health and family outcomes seven years after birth. Treyvaud K, Lee KJ, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. J Pediatr. 2014;164:515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mothers separated from their newborn infants. Klaus MH, Kennell JH. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1970;17:1015–1037. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)32493-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Simons SH, van Dijk M, Anand KS, Roofthooft D, van Lingen RA, Tibboel D. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:1058–1064. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stressors of NICU mothers and the effect of counseling-experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital, India. Chourasia N, Surianarayanan P, Bethou A, Bhat V. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:616–618. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.743522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Using the parental stressor scale: NICU with a British sample of mothers of moderate risk preterm infants. Reid T, Bramwell R. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2003;21:279–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parent stress in the neonatal intensive care unit and the influence of parent and infant characteristics. Dudek-Shriber L. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58:509–520. doi: 10.5014/ajot.58.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Forgotten parent: NICU paternal emotional response. Mackley AB, Locke RG, Spear ML, Joseph R. Adv Neonatal Care. 2010;10:200–203. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3181e946f0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Assessment of stress among parents of neonates admitted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. Ganguly R, Patnaik L, Sahoo J, Pattanaik S, Sahu T. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:288. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_169_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) status survey in and around Hyderabad, Telangana. Babu SM, Ashwani N, Rekha NA, Murki S, Tejopratap O, Kumar SC. Int J Pediatr Rea. 2016;3:705–711. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mothers are not fathers: differences between parents in the reduction of stress levels after a parental intervention in a NICU. Matricardi S, Agostino R, Fedeli C, Montirosso R. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:8–14. doi: 10.1111/apa.12058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Role perception and response to stress in fathers and mothers following pre-term delivery. Jeffcoate JA, Humphrey ME, Lloyd JK. Soc Sci Med. 1979;13:139–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The neonatal intensive care unit environment: sources of stress for parents. Miles MS, Funk SG, Kasper MA. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1991;2:346–354. doi: 10.4037/15597768-1991-2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Acculturation and stress in Chinese-American parents of infants cared for in the intensive care unit. Lee SY, Lee KA, Rankin SH, Alkon A, Weiss SJ. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5:315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.adnc.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maternal recall of the neonatal intensive care unit. Wereszczak J, Miles MS, Holditch-Davis D. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9216318/ Neonatal Netw. 1997;16:33–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parents' perceptions of environmental stressors in the special care nursery. Perehudoff B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2392115/ Neonatal Netw. 1990;9:39–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Parent stress and coping in NICU and PICU. Young Seideman R, Watson MA, Corff KE, Odle P, Haase J, Bowerman JL. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997;12:169–177. doi: 10.1016/s0882-5963(97)80074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Correlates of anxiety, hostility, depression, and psychosocial adjustment in parents of NICU infants. Doering LV, Moser DK, Dracup K. Neonatal Netw. 2000;19:15–23. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.19.5.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anxiety levels of mothers whose infants have been cared for in unit level-I of a neonatal intensive care unit in Turkey. Erdem Y. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:1738–1747. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES