Correction to : Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine (2024) 17:93-100
10.1007/s12178-024-09885-z
In the section on “Comparative Studies” “Wagner et al. also compared the 2-year outcomes of SCR with either LDT or LTT [15]. In their study, 63 patients underwent SCR and 24 arthroscopically assisted TT.” should have read “Wagner et al. also compared the 2-year outcomes of SCR with either LDT or LTT [15]. In their study, 163 patients underwent SCR and 24 arthroscopically assisted TT.”
In the “Conclusions” section “LTT seems to be superior to other procedures, such as SCR, for patients with an external rotation lag sign, severe infraspinatus fatty infiltration, and involvement of the teres major.” should have read “LTT seems to be superior to other procedures, such as SCR, for patients with an external rotation lag sign, severe infraspinatus fatty infiltration, and involvement of the teres minor.”
The original article has been corrected.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.