Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1994 Mar 15;298(Pt 3):537–541. doi: 10.1042/bj2980537

Unmethylated thyroglobulin promoter may be repressed by methylation of flanking DNA sequences.

B Pichon 1, C Christophe-Hobertus 1, G Vassart 1, D Christophe 1
PMCID: PMC1137892  PMID: 8141765

Abstract

The thyroglobulin gene, like many other tissue-specific genes, appears to be specifically less methylated in the differentiated cell type where it is transcribed. The thyroglobulin gene promoter elements themselves are highly CG-deficient and do not contain any HpaII/MspI sites. In this study, using DNA constructs that were methylated in vitro with HpaII or MspI methylases, we show that DNA methylation of vector sequences is sufficient to repress the activity of the thyroglobulin gene promoter in transient transfection experiments. Reporter-gene expression from a plasmid containing only the proximal thyroglobulin gene promoter is sensitive to DNA methylation even in fully differentiated thyrocytes. Transcription from methylated plasmids containing the thyroglobulin gene enhancer and proximal promoter is also clearly reduced when the transfected cells are maintained under less-differentiated conditions. These results indicate that DNA methylation can influence, from a distance, the activity of an unmodified promoter. Our results also agree with the view that loss of DNA methylation does not constitute a prerequisite for thyroglobulin gene expression in differentiated thyrocytes, where the thyroglobulin gene enhancer and promoter are activated. However, the production of thyroglobulin transcripts could be severely impaired when this activation is not maximal, as is the case in less-differentiated cells or when the enhancer element is lacking. We suggest that DNA methylation helps to maintain the thyroglobulin gene in an inactive state unless all of the conditions required for its expression are fulfilled, and that the thyroid-specific demethylation events are a consequence of the activation state of the gene.

Full text

PDF
537

Images in this article

539Figure 2
on p.539

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams R. L. DNA methylation. The effect of minor bases on DNA-protein interactions. Biochem J. 1990 Jan 15;265(2):309–320. doi: 10.1042/bj2650309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Hattar J., Beard P., Jiricny J. Cytosine methylation in CTF and Sp1 recognition sites of an HSV tk promoter: effects on transcription in vivo and on factor binding in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Dec 25;17(24):10179–10190. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.24.10179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyes J., Bird A. Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):327–333. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05055.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene activity. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):3–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90479-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christophe-Hobertus C., Donda A., Javaux F., Vassart G., Christophe D. Identification of a transcriptional enhancer upstream from the bovine thyroglobulin gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992 Oct;88(1-3):31–37. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(92)90006-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christophe D., Gérard C., Juvenal G., Bacolla A., Teugels E., Ledent C., Christophe-Hobertus C., Dumont J. E., Vassart G. Identification of a cAMP-responsive region in thyroglobulin gene promoter. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1989 Jun;64(1):5–18. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(89)90060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gérard C. M., Lefort A., Christophe D., Libert F., Van Sande J., Dumont J. E., Vassart G. Control of thyroperoxidase and thyroglobulin transcription by cAMP: evidence for distinct regulatory mechanisms. Mol Endocrinol. 1989 Dec;3(12):2110–2118. doi: 10.1210/mend-3-12-2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hergersberg M. Biological aspects of cytosine methylation in eukaryotic cells. Experientia. 1991 Dec 1;47(11-12):1171–1185. doi: 10.1007/BF01918381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lazzaro D., Price M., de Felice M., Di Lauro R. The transcription factor TTF-1 is expressed at the onset of thyroid and lung morphogenesis and in restricted regions of the foetal brain. Development. 1991 Dec;113(4):1093–1104. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ledent C., Parmentier M., Vassart G. Tissue-specific expression and methylation of a thyroglobulin-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase fusion gene in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(16):6176–6180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levine A., Cantoni G. L., Razin A. Inhibition of promoter activity by methylation: possible involvement of protein mediators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 1;88(15):6515–6518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levine A., Cantoni G. L., Razin A. Methylation in the preinitiation domain suppresses gene transcription by an indirect mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1;89(21):10119–10123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis J. D., Meehan R. R., Henzel W. J., Maurer-Fogy I., Jeppesen P., Klein F., Bird A. Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA. Cell. 1992 Jun 12;69(6):905–914. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90610-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li E., Bestor T. H., Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell. 1992 Jun 12;69(6):915–926. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Libert F., Vassart G., Christophe D. Methylation and expression of the human thyroglobulin gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986 Feb 13;134(3):1109–1113. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(86)90365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Razin A., Szyf M. DNA methylation patterns. Formation and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 10;782(4):331–342. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roger P. P., Van Heuverswyn B., Lambert C., Reuse S., Vassart G., Dumont J. E. Antagonistic effects of thyrotropin and epidermal growth factor on thyroglobulin mRNA level in cultured thyroid cells. Eur J Biochem. 1985 Oct 15;152(2):239–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb09189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weih F., Nitsch D., Reik A., Schütz G., Becker P. B. Analysis of CpG methylation and genomic footprinting at the tyrosine aminotransferase gene: DNA methylation alone is not sufficient to prevent protein binding in vivo. EMBO J. 1991 Sep;10(9):2559–2567. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07796.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yisraeli J., Adelstein R. S., Melloul D., Nudel U., Yaffe D., Cedar H. Muscle-specific activation of a methylated chimeric actin gene. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):409–416. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90661-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES