Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Protoc. 2024 Sep;4(9):e1123. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.1123

Establishing Primary and Stable Cell Lines from Frozen Wing Biopsies for Cellular, Physiological, and Genetic Studies in Bats

Fengyan Deng 1, Pedro Morales-Sosa 1, Andrea Bernal-Rivera 3, Yan Wang 1, Dai Tsuchiya 1, Jose Emmanuel Javier 1, Nicolas Rohner 1,2, Chongbei Zhao 1,*, Jasmin Camacho 1,*
PMCID: PMC11378949  NIHMSID: NIHMS2014093  PMID: 39228233

Abstract

Bats stand out among mammalian species for their exceptional traits, including the capacity to navigate through flight and echolocation, conserve energy through torpor/hibernation, harbor a multitude of viruses, exhibit resistance to disease, survive harsh environmental conditions, and demonstrate exceptional longevity compared to other mammals of similar size. In vivo studies of bats are challenging for several reasons such as ability to locate and capture them in their natural environments, limited accessibility, low sample size, environmental variation, long lifespans, slow reproductive rates, zoonotic disease risks, species protection, and ethical concerns. Thus, establishing alternative laboratory models is crucial for investigating the diverse physiological adaptations observed in bats. Obtaining quality cells from tissues is a critical first step for successful primary cell derivation. However, it is often impractical to collect fresh tissue and process the samples immediately for cell culture due to the resources required for isolating and expanding cells. As a result, frozen tissue is typically the starting resource for bat primary cell derivation. Yet, cells in frozen tissue are usually damaged and represent low integrity and viability. As a result, isolating primary cells from frozen tissues poses a significant challenge. Herein, we present a successfully developed protocol for isolating primary dermal fibroblasts from frozen bat wing biopsies. This protocol marks a significant milestone, as this the first protocol specially focused on fibroblasts isolation from bat frozen tissue. We also describe methods for primary cell characterization, genetic manipulation of primary cells through lentivirus transduction, and the development of stable cell lines.

Basic Protocol 1:

Bat wing biopsy collection and preservation

Support Protocol 1:

Blood collection from bat- venipuncture

Basic Protocol 2:

Isolation of primary fibroblasts from adult bat frozen wing biopsy

Support Protocol 2:

Maintenance of primary fibroblasts

Support Protocol 3:

Cell banking and thawing of primary fibroblasts

Support Protocol 4:

Growth curve and doubling time

Basic Protocol 3:

Lentiviral transduction of bat primary fibroblasts

Basic Protocol 4:

Bat stable fibroblasts cell lines development

Support Protocol 5:

Bat fibroblasts validation by immunofluorescence staining

Basic Protocol 5:

Chromosome counting

Keywords: bat, fibroblasts, frozen tissue, wing biopsy, primary cell derivation, stable cell line development, lentivirus

INTRODUCTION

Bats, which make up one fifth of all mammals, have become an important experimental model due to their unique biological features (Brook et al., 2020; Dejosez et al., 2023; Galvan et al., 2016; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2018; Prat, Taub, & Yovel, 2015; Simmons, Seymour, Habersetzer, & Gunnell, 2008; Toledo et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020). They are the only active flying mammals and can use laryngeal echolocation to orient in darkness (Simmons et al., 2008). Bats are distributed across every continent except Antarctica (Calisher, Childs, Field, Holmes, & Schountz, 2006) with a diverse habitat from tropical rainforests to boreal forests, arid regions and oceanic islands (Altringham, 2011). They perform essential ecological functions that contribute to the health of our environment, including pest control, seed dispersal, and pollination (Kunz, Braun de Torrez, Bauer, Lobova, & Fleming, 2011). Bats have also been identified as natural reservoirs of many infectious disease agents including Ebola virus (Leendertz, Gogarten, Dux, Calvignac-Spencer, & Leendertz, 2016; Olival & Hayman, 2014), Marburg virus (Olival & Hayman, 2014), SARS-like Coronaviruses (W. Li et al., 2005; Temmam et al., 2022), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) (Memish et al., 2013) and so on. Despite the importance of bats in ecosystems and epidemiology, the adaptations of their physiology and how their cells handle different viruses are poorly understood. The establishment of in vitro bat cell models will facilitate studies of their physiological adaptations and potential molecular implications to their heightened antiviral defenses (Irving, Ahn, Goh, Anderson, & Wang, 2021), tolerance to viral infections (Ahn et al., 2019; Gorbunova, Seluanov, & Kennedy, 2020), ability to survive in harsh conditions (Bondarenco, Kortner, & Geiser, 2014; Hirakawa & Nagasaka, 2018; Studier, 1969; Tuttle, 2011), and longevity (Foley et al., 2018; Wilkinson et al., 2021).

Acquiring high-quality cells from tissues is an essential initial stage for the successful derivation of fibroblasts and other primary cell types. During field work to capture bats, the feasibility of collecting fresh tissue and promptly processing the samples for cell culture is hindered by the laboratory resources required for isolating and expanding cells, including specialized media, drug treatments, 4°C cold storage, centrifuge, microscope, cell incubators, and access to −80°C storage (Crameri et al., 2009; Yohe et al., 2019). As a result, frozen tissue is commonly the initial resource for deriving primary bat cells. Obtaining high-quality cells from frozen tissues is a pivotal first step for primary cell derivation. However, frozen tissue often contains damaged cells, leading to reduced integrity and viability, making the derivation of primary cells particularly challenging. To address this, we have developed a rapid, field-ready method to cryopreserve wing biopsies for optimal recovery of healthy cells from frozen skin samples (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Workflow of bat wing biopsy collection and cryopreservation.

Figure 1.

This works best with two people but can be done alone. A. The bat is gently wrapped in a cotton bat bag, with head covered, to reduce stress prior to sampling. B. The wing is first outstretched and inspected for a sampling site at the plagiopatagium, close to the body, and free from major blood vessels, muscle fibers, and hair. C. The skin of the sample site is cleaned with 70% ethanol and antiseptic. The dotted circle shows an example of one 3 mm wing biopsy punch taken in an area with little vascularization. D. The biopsy punch is washed in antiseptic and PBS. E. The small bat wing biopsy is digested in EDTA-Trypsin before adding freezing media, followed by cryopreservation.

Fibroblasts are the most common cells in connective tissue and are distributed across every organ system in the body (Kendall & Feghali-Bostwick, 2014). They are easy to grow and are commonly used to produce induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) to generate other cell types (Meissner, Wernig, & Jaenisch, 2007). Besides, fibroblasts are the principal source of the extensive extracellular matrix (ECM), and play essential roles in wound healing, inflammation response, tissue regeneration, angiogenesis, cancer progression, and viral infection progression (Kendall & Feghali-Bostwick, 2014). Thus, fibroblasts are often used to study disease related inflammation (Davidson et al., 2021; Mizoguchi et al., 2018) and innate immune response across species (Gaska et al., 2019; Hagai et al., 2018; Schneor et al., 2023). The isolation of bat fibroblasts and the development of stable fibroblast cell lines would contribute to the understanding of bat biology and its implications for various fields, including ecology, virology, and comparative physiology (Dejosez et al., 2023; Hagai et al., 2018; Schneor et al., 2023).

The double-layered epidermis of the bat wing (Fig. 2A) provides strength to withstand the stresses of flight and serves as a robust barrier against potential pathogens encountered in caves or during flight. If damage occurs in the wing, it can rapidly heal the wound due to immune cells (Fig. 2B) migrating to the injury site (Greville, 2018; Pollock, 2016), dermal fibroblasts proliferating and producing ECM, followed by remodeling of the newly formed tissue (Davis, 1972). However, due to the special structure of the bat wing skin tissue (Fig. 1A), the normal skin fibroblasts derivation method is not efficient enough for fibroblast derivation from bat wing tissue. In this article, we have developed a protocol for isolating fibroblasts from frozen bat wing biopsies obtained from adult bats in the wild (Fig. 2C). The isolated fibroblasts can be cultured, expanded, frozen, thawed, assayed, genetically edited, and used for biological experiments. In our hands, fibroblasts (Fig. 3) isolated from cryopreserved wing tissue can be cultured for more than 20 passages and tissue explants for at least four months (Fig. 4), while maintaining similar morphology and growth rate (Fig. 5). We have successfully applied this procedure to wing tissue isolated from two distinct lineages of bats from the families Mormoopidae (13 known species) and Phyllostomidae (216 known species). Tissues were obtained from two species, Pteronotus mesoamericanus Smith, 1972 (P. Meso) (16-19.5g) and Micronycteris schmidtorum Sanborn 1935 (M. Sch) (7-10g) (Secretariat, 2023). With cell lines established, we have developed an improved bat fibroblast growth medium (Fig. 5, 6), optimized genetic manipulation using lentiviral transduction (Fig. 7), and standardized protocols to characterize bat fibroblasts with molecular markers (Fig. 8) and karyotyping (Fig. 9). Overall, our study enables the easy use of cell isolation and cell expansion from cryopreserved tissue for future research.

Figure 2. Bat wing layers and workflow of primary fibroblasts isolation.

Figure 2.

A. Bat wing structure. The bat wing comprised two epidermis and connective tissue layer. The epidermis, which contains stratum corneum and non-keratinized, made up most proportion of the bat wing thickness. The connective tissue layer is composed mostly of elastic and collagen fibres, with capillary perfused in the middle. B. Additional cell types within the dermis. C. Overview of bat wing fibroblasts derivation. Frozen small pieces of bat wing biopsy were dissociated with dispase to expose the connective tissue, which was further digested with collagenase and centrifuged. Cells and small tissue pieces were resuspended with bat primary fibroblasts culture media and seeded on gelatin coated plates.

Figure 3. Phase-contrast images showing the morphology of bat wing tissue and cells at different stages of primary fibroblasts isolation.

Figure 3.

A. bat wing species before dissociation. B. bat wing tissues after dispase dissociation. C. After collagenase dissociation. D. Cells at 5-day post derivation.

Figure 4. Phase-contrast images showing the morphology of M. Sch fibroblasts and bat wing explant from different timepoints.

Figure 4.

A. M. Sch fibroblast cells P1. B. M. Sch fibroblast cells P15. C. M. Sch wing tissue explant at 17-day post derivation. D. M. Sch wing tissue explant at 25-day post derivation. E. M. Sch wing tissue explant at 45-day post derivation. F. M. Sch wing tissue explant at 98-day post derivation. G. M. Sch wing tissue explant at 98-day, 0 day after transferring into new well. H. M. Sch wing tissue explant at 103-day post derivation, 5 days after transferring into new well.

Figure 5. Morphology, size and cell proliferation of fibroblasts during parallel cultivation in normal fibroblasts media (NFM) and bat primary fibroblasts media (BFM).

Figure 5.

A. Fluorescence microscope images obtained upon F-actin staining of fibroblasts. scale bar = 50 μm; red fluorescence: F-actin; blue fluorescence: DAPI. B. fibroblasts size determined using Image J software. 60 cells from each group were measured for quantification. C. Doubling time of fibroblasts cultured in NFM and BFM. Doubling time of the cells were calculated using online Doubling Time Computing software: https://www.doubling-time.com/compute.php.

Figure 6. Bat fibroblasts proliferation.

Figure 6.

A. Phase-contrast images showing the morphology of M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts at different timepoints. B. Growth curve of M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts at different passages. C. doubling time of M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts at different passages. Doubling Time Computing software: https://www.doubling-time.com/compute.php.

Figure 7. Lentiviral transduction of M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts.

Figure 7.

(A) White field and fluorescent images of lentiviral infected fibroblasts showing transduction efficiency of eGFP. (B) Representative flow cytometry plot of bat fibroblasts transduction efficiency. eGFP lentiviral infected bat fibroblasts were analyzed by Cytek® Aurora System.

Figure 8. Immunofluorescence analysis of M. Sch and P. Meso primary fibroblasts and immortalized cell lines.

Figure 8.

A. Vimentin SMA and F-actin staining of M. Sch and P. Meso primary fibroblasts. Green: Vimentin; Yellow: SMA; Magenta: F-actin; Blue: DAPI. B. Vimentin and SMA staining of M. Sch fibroblasts -TERT-GFP and P. Meso fibroblasts -SV40-GFP/hTERT-GFP. Green: GFP; Yellow: SMA; Magenta: Vimentin; Blue: DAPI. C. Phase-contrast images showing morphology changes during P. Meso primary fibroblasts immortalization progress.

Figure 9. Karyotyping of M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts.

Figure 9.

A Representative chromosome spread for M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts. B. The graph shows the chromosome counting of M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts. The chromosome numbers of 43 and 55 metaphase chromosome spreads respectively for M. Sch and P. Meso fibroblasts were counted.

Basic protocol 1 describes the collection and preservation of bat wing biopsy. Basic protocol 2 describes the isolation of primary fibroblasts from adult bat frozen wing biopsy. Basic protocol 3 describes lentiviral transduction of bat primary fibroblasts. Basic protocol 4 describes the development of bat stable fibroblasts cell lines. Basic protocol 5 describes the details of a crucial technique in genetics and cytogenetics: chromosome counting. Support protocol 1 provides the detailed method of blood collection from bat- venipuncture. Support protocol 2 describes the maintenance of primary fibroblasts. Support protocol 3 describes cell banking and thawing of primary fibroblasts. Support protocol 4 provides the description of testing cell growth curve and doubling time. Support protocol 5 provides detailed method of bat fibroblasts validation by immunofluorescence staining.

Basic Protocol 1: Bat wing biopsy collection and preservation

Note: The bat wing biopsy collection is conducted with a research permit and a wildlife collecting license granted by the Forestry Division according to each country's requirements for scientific research.

Note: Export and import permits must be obtained according to each country's Forestry Division requirements.

This protocol describes the detailed method to collect and preserve bat wing biopsies (Fig. 1).

Materials

  • Bats

  • Frozen vial with wing biopsy

  • 293T cells

  • Sterile 70% isopropyl alcohol prep pads (VWR, Cat # 75840-802)

  • Sterile povidone-iodine antiseptic swabsticks (Dynarex, Cat # 1201)

  • Ethanol, 70%

  • Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%, STEMCELL Technologies, Cat # 07901)

  • Liquid nitrogen (LN2)

  • 2 mL centrifuge tube (AXYGEN, Cat # 09819135)

  • Dry ice

  • Freezing Media 1 (10 mL)
    Reagent Volume Final
    Concentration
    Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (PEAK, Cat # PS-FB2) 9 mL 90%
    Dimethyl sulfoxide hydri-max (DMSO) (Sigma, Cat # 67-68-5) 1 mL 10%
  • Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Corning, Cat# 21040CV)

  • Gelatin solution (Millipore, Cat# ES-006-B)

  • Dispase (1 U/mL) (STEMCELL Technology, Cat # 07923)

  • Collagenase Type IV (STEMCELL Technology, Cat # 07427)

  • Bat primary fibroblasts culture media composition (100 mL)
    Reagent Volume Final
    Concentration
    Advanced DMEM/F-12 (Gibco, Cat # 12-634-010) 87.59 mL 90%
    HyClone Characterized FBS (Cytiva, Cat # SH30071.03) 10 mL 10%
    GlutaMAX Supplement (Gibco, Cat # 35050061) 1 mL 1%
    bFGF (0.1 mg/mL) (Gibco, Ca t# PHG0021) 0.01 mL 10 ng/mL
    Amphotericin B (R & D System, Ca t# B23192) 0.4 mL 1 μg/mL
    Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) (Gibco, Cat # 15140122) 1 mL 1X
  • Normal fibroblasts media composition (100 mL)
    Reagent Volume Final
    Concentration
    DMEM (ATCC, Cat # 30-2002) 87.59 mL 90%
    FBS (PEAK, Cat # PS-FB2) 10 mL 10%
    Amphotericin B (R & D System, Cat # B23192) 0.4 mL 10 ng/mL
    Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) (Gibco, Cat # 15140122) 1 mL 1 μg/mL
  • Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen TM, Cat # L3000001)

  • pIB2-SEC13-mEGFP (gifted from Dr. Subu Ramanathan)

  • VSV-G (Addgene, Cat # 12259-pMD2.G)

  • psPAX2 (Addgene, Cat # 12260-psPAX2)

  • Polybrene (R&D Systems, Cat # 7711)

  • 0.45 μM filter (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # SE1M003M00)

  • Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) (ATCC, Cat # 30-2002)

  • Sodium Pyruvate (100mM) (Corning, Cat # 25-000-CI)

  • Lentivirus packaging media composition
    Reagent Volume Final
    Concentration
    Opti-MEM Reduced serum media (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat # 31985062) 47.4 mL 95%
    HyClone Characterized FBS (Cytiva, Cat # SH30071.03) 2.5 mL 5%
    Sodium Pyruvate (100mM) (Corning, Cat # 25-000-CI) 0.1 mL 20 μM
  • hTERT (CMV, GFP-Puro) lentivirus in PBS (GenTarget Inc, Cat # LVP1130-GP-PBS)

  • SV40 large T-antigen (CMV, GFP-Puro) lentivirus in PBS (GenTarget Inc, Cat# LVP016-GP)

  • Puromycin (invivoGen, Cat # ant-pr-1)

  • Colcemid (10 μg/mL stock; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Cat # 15212-012).

  • KaryoMAX Potassium Chloride Solution (KCl) (ThermoFisher, Cat # 10575090)

  • VECTASHIELD® Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector, Cat # H-1200-10)

  • Fixative (80 mL)
    Reagent Volume Final
    Concentration
    Methanol (VWR, Cat # PL230ZA-4P) 60 mL 66.666%
    Glacial acetic acid (Fisher Scientific, Cat # AC22214-0010) 20 mL 33.333%
  • Cryovial (Corning, Cat # 430659)

  • Mr. Frosty® Freezing Container (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat # 5100-0001) or Corning® CoolCell LX Cell Freezing Container (Sigma, Cat # CLS432004)

  • Disposable surgical gloves

  • Biopsy Punches 3 mm disposable (VWR, Cat # 21909-136

  • Sterile, single use petri 35 mm dishes (Falcon, Cat # 351008)

  • Forceps (Fine Science Tools, Cat # 91150-20)

  • T25 cell culture flask (Corning, Cat # 430639)

  • 15 mL tube (Peak, Cat # PS-696)

  • 6-well culture plate (Corning, Cat # 3516)

  • 12-well culture plate (Corning, Cat # 3513)

  • Conical tubes (15 mL) (VWR, Cat # 21008-918)

  • Portable pipette aid and pipette

  • Micro pipettes (Integra)

  • Inverted Microscope (Leica)

  • Axiovert inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss)

  • Centrifuge (Thermo Scientific Heraeus Megafuge 8)

  • 37°C Incubator

  • Curved and straight scissors with sharp ends

  • Disposable scalpel (Sklar Instruments, Cat # 06-3120)

  • Micro cover glass (VWR, Cat # 48393172)

  • Premium Plain Glass Microscope Slides (Fisher Scientific, Cat # 12-544-4)
    1. Gently wrap a bat with a cotton bag with their faces covered (Fig. 1A).
      Note: Bats should be gently wrapped with a cotton bag with their faces covered to calm bats (7g-50g), to reduce stress and the risk of injury.
      Note: should collect wing punches from as many bats as needed for the experiment, with a minimum of 3 biological replicates. However, bats should be age-matched, which requires epigenetic profiling. one cell line = one individual bat.
    2. Prior to biopsy, extend bat wing (Fig. 1B) with a back flight to ensure major blood vessels are not present in biopsy area.
    3. Sample the area(s) on the flight membrane closer to the body wall, which heals rapidly.
    4. At sample site, cleanse the skin thoroughly using alcohol prep pads until the pad shows no traces of dirt (Fig. 1C).
    5. Prepare the same site by applying antiseptic with a swab (Fig. 1C).
    6. Extend and position the wing against a flat, hard surface with a sterile petri dish when using the biopsy tool. Keep biopsy punch perpendicular to the wing while pressing and twisting to cut out (Fig. 1C).
      Note: Do not rock the tool side-to-side.
    7. Use sterile forceps to collect the 3 mm skin biopsy that remains behind on the cutting surface of the petri dish. If the biopsy is lodged in the biopsy punch, use forceps to remove the sample.
    8. Rinse biopsy punch with antiseptic solution for 30 s and rinse biopsy with fresh 1x PBS to remove it (Fig. 1D).
    9. Transfer clean tissue into a 2 mL centrifuge tube filled with 1 mL 0.05% EDTA-Trypsin and incubate for 40 min at ambient temperature (31°- 35°C) (Fig. 1E).
    10. To the same tube, add 1 mL Freezing Media 1 (Fig. 1E).
    11. Immediately place the cryovials into a Freezing Container on dry ice (−78.5°C) for a minimum of 80 minutes (−1°C per minute) before transferring to a −80°C freezer or LN2 (Fig. 1E).
    12. Store in a −80°C freezer for up to 4 months or in LN2 for long-term storage until primary cell derivation.

Support Protocol 1: Blood collection from bat- venipuncture

This protocol describes the detailed method to collect blood from bat venipuncture (Fig. 1)

Note: Bat derived cells should be obtained from healthy (rabies-free) bats. The health status can be screened from non-lethal blood serum collection for testing by the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (USA). However, if rabies-neutralizing antibodies are detected, the test cannot differentiate whether the immune response is from current infection or prior rabies virus exposure (Seetahal et al., 2020) .

Note: If lethal samples are obtained, the brainstem should be isolated and stored in RNAlater Stabilization Solution (ThermoFisher, AM7020) or flash frozen, and tested for rabies with RT-PCR (Wadhwa et al., 2017).

Additional Materials

  • VivaGuard® Lancet 30G (VWR, Cat # 76670-432)

  • PTS Collect Capillary Tube 50 μL (CLIAwaived, Cat # CHEK-2134)

  • RNALater (LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP, Cat # AM7020)

  • Screw-Cap Microcentrifuge Tubes 0.5 mL (VWR, Cat # 10025-744) or MiniCollect® Serum Tubes (VWR, Cat # 95057-286)

  • Low speed centrifuge (VWR, Cat # 470316-804)

  • Cryotubes 0.5 mL (VWR, Cat # 76642-646)

  • Holding bag (Avinet, Cat # BB-DISP+)

Note: For added protection of the handler, an anti-cut finger protector can be placed on the index finger of the non-dominant hand with a second glove to cover it.

  1. Using the dominant hand, a 30G lancet should be held at a 15–30-degree angle with the needle bevel facing up. Puncture the vein in a smooth quick motion.
    Note: The free wing of the bat (Fig. 1A, iv) should be outstretched, with the forearm resting between the thumb and index finger of the non-dominant hand (Fig. 1A, v). This extends the wing in an upstroke position enabling visualization and sampling from the cephalic or median antebrachial vein (Fig. 1B).
  2. Quickly collect blood using a 50 μL capillary tube and transfer to a 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
    Note: Limit blood collection to a maximum of 10% body weight. For a 10 g bat, collect a maximum of 100 μL blood sample.
  3. After blood collection, apply direct pressure to stop the bleeding.

  4. The bat should be offered water and food, according to the diet type, to recover (Fig. 1A).
    Note: In general, offer local insects to insect-feeding bats, a ripe banana to fruit-feeding bats, and 20% honey water to nectar-feeding bats.
  5. Place bat in a cotton bat bag and allow to rest for at least 5 min to ensure hemostasis has occurred.

  6. Allow the blood sample to clot at ambient temperature for 30 - 45 minutes.

  7. Pellet blood clot by centrifugation at 4,000-4,500 rpm for 10 minutes using a low-speed centrifuge placed in a refrigerator.

  8. Following centrifugation, immediately transfer the serum into sterile 0.5 mL cryotubes.

  9. Store serum in LN2.

  10. Flash freeze blood clot or store in RNALater for collaborative projects found at https://www.gbatnet.org/interdisciplinary-projects/.

Basic Protocol 2: Isolation of primary fibroblasts from adult bat frozen wing biopsy

This protocol describes the detailed method to isolate primary fibroblasts from bat frozen wing biopsy collection (Fig. 2).

Note: The bat primary fibroblast isolation procedure and cell culture are all performed in a biosafety cabinet in a biological safety level 2 room.

Note: All solutions and dissection tools used in isolation of primary fibroblast processing as well as cell culture processing must be sterile.

  1. Take out the frozen vial with wing biopsy from LN2, and transfer to BSL2 lab on dry ice.

  2. Thaw frozen cryovials in hand and immediately transfer wing biopsy with tweezers into one well of a 6-well plate that is preloaded with 3 mL of DPBS+5X P/S and incubate for 5 min at room temperature (RT).

Note: hereafter, all the cell derivation and culture experiments will be carried out in a biosafety cabinet in a BSL2 room.

  • 3.

    Transfer the wing biopsy to another new well of the same 6-well plate with 3 mL of PBS+5X P/S, incubate for 5 min at RT.

  • 4.

    Repeat step 3 once.

  • 5.

    Mince wing biopsy into small pieces with a sterile scalpel or scissor (Fig. 3A).

  • 6.

    Add 3 mL of dispase solution to each well, ensure the tissue pieces are submerged in solution. Incubate at 37°C for 90 min.

  • 7.

    Pipet the tissue up and down about 5-10 times by 1000 μL pipet.

  • 8.

    Observe under microscope. If the wing biopsy separated into 2 layers (Fig. 3B), go to step 9. If not, continue incubating in dispase solution at 37°C for another 30 min.

  • 9.

    Transfer the tissue into a new well of 6-well plate preloaded with 3 mL collagenase Type IV solution (1 mg/mL). Incubate at 37°C for 12 h.

  • 10.

    Pipet the tissue up and down about 10 times by 1000 μL pipet.

  • 11.

    Observe under microscope until most tissue is dissociated into very small pieces or cell clusters (Fig. 3C).

  • 12.

    Add 3 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media to stop collagenase IV dissociation.

  • 13.

    Transfer cells into a 15 mL tube.

  • 14.

    Centrifuge at 1000 rpm for 5 min.

  • 15.

    Aspirate the supernatant, resuspend the cells in each tube with 1 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media.

  • 16.

    Seed cells/small tissue pieces in 12-well culture plate coated with 0.1% gelatin (add 1 mL of 0.1% gelatin to each well in a 12-welll plate, incubate at 37°C for at least 30 mins, aspirate gelatin before use).

Note: Cells were dissociated into cells/small tissue pieces instead of single cells before seeding.

Note: Cells/small tissue pieces from 5-6X4-9 mm2 were seeded into 2 wells of 12-well plate.

  • 17.

    Incubate cells at 37°C, with 5% CO2.

Note: For culture of primary fibroblasts derived from adult bat frozen wing biopsy, 2-5 days after seeding, attached cells will be visible by microscopy (Fig. 3D).

Note: P0 cells might show different morphologies, indicating different cell types including fibroblasts and endothelial cells, epithelial cells (Fig. 3D).

Support Protocol 2: Primary fibroblasts culture and subculture (Fig. 4)

After initial seeding of the primary culture, observe the cells by microscopy every day. When cells are 50-90% confluent, subculture cells. This protocol describes the detailed method for primary fibroblasts culture and subculture.

Materials

Materials are included in basic protocol 1.

  1. After initial seeding of the primary culture, observe the cells under microscope every day until cells are 50-90% confluent (4-6 days).

  2. Transfer the old media together with the small tissue pieces and suspension cells to another well of the 12-well plate.

Note: Primary fibroblasts will be continually released from the tissue explants and attach to the bottom of the tissue culture dish (Fig. 4C, D, E, F).

Note: We kept transfer old media together with the small tissue pieces and suspension cells to new wells at least 3 times for primary cell derivation.

Note: With this method, the bat wing tissue explants were able to survive for >100 days and keep releasing cells in the bat primary fibroblasts culture media (Fig. 4G, H).

  • 3.

    Wash cells once with bat primary fibroblast culture media and transfer the supernatant to the same well in step 2.

  • 4.

    Add 300 μL of TrypLE to each well (12-well plate), incubate 5 min at 37°C.

  • 5.

    Add 300 μL bat primary fibroblasts culture media to stop the dissociation.

  • 6.

    Transfer cells to a 15 mL tube.

  • 7.

    Centrifuge at 1000 rpm for 5 min.

  • 8.

    Aspirate the supernatant, resuspend the cells with 1 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media.

  • 9.

    To expand cells, plate the cells from 1 well of 12-well plate into 2 wells of a 6-well plate coated with 0.1% gelatin. Incubate cells at 37°C, with 5% CO2.

Note: Hereafter, we can keep expanding the cells.

Note: For the 2 primary bat wing fibroblasts from 2 different bat species P. Meso and M. Sch, we usually subculture them at 1:4 ratio, every 3-4 days.

Note: fibroblasts derived from bat frozen wing biopsy can be cultured in bat primary fibroblasts culture media for more than 20 passages without observable morphological changes (Fig. 4A, B).

Note: after 3 passages, most cells showed spindle shaped or stellate shaped morphology, which is the typical active fibroblasts morphology.

Support Protocol 3: Growth curve and doubling time.

In cell culture, growth curves and doubling time are critical parameters that provide valuable insights into the behavior and characteristics of cultured cells. This protocol describes the detailed method for testing growth curve and doubling time.

Materials

Materials are included in basic protocol 1.

  1. Seed bat fibroblasts (different passages) in 1 mL cell culture media (normal fibroblasts media or bat primary fibroblasts culture media) in wells of 12-well plates at a concentration of 4-8 x104 cells/well. Incubate cells at 37°C, with 5% CO2.

Note: Culture bat primary fibroblasts in bat primary fibroblasts culture media is critical for bat primary fibroblasts derivation (Fig. 5).

Note: Bat primary fibroblasts represent different morphologies when cultured in different media (Fig. 5A, B).

Note: the cells growth curve and doubling time for both bat species are consistent among early passages <P11 when using bat primary fibroblasts culture media (Fig. 6).

Note: the cells growth curve and doubling time for M. Sch fibroblasts cultured in different media are different (Fig. 5C).

Support Protocol 4: Cell banking and thawing of primary fibroblasts.

Cell banking plays a critical role in securing valuable cells for future in vitro research and in vivo applications. While thawing the cells is recovering and reviving frozen cells from cryopreservation to maintain the viability of the culture. This protocol describes the detailed method for cell banking and thawing of primary fibroblasts.

Note: We recommend cryopreserving bat primary fibroblasts at P3, P4 or P5 when the culture is approximately 90% confluent and actively growing.

Materials (other materials are included in basic protocol 1)

Freezing Media 2 (10 mL)

Reagent Volume Final
Concentration
HyClone FBS 9 mL 90%
Dimethyl sulfoxide hydri-max (DMSO) 1 mL 10%

Note: Make fresh freezing media each time before the cryopreservation of cells.

Cell banking

  1. Aspirate the media from the culture plate (6-well plate) and wash the cells once with 2 mL DPBS.

  2. Add 1 mL TrypLE, and incubate for 5 min at 37°C.

  3. Add 1 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media.

  4. Transfer cells to a 15 mL tube.

  5. Centrifuge the cells at 1000 rpm for 5 min.

  6. Remove supernatant and resuspend the cells in freezing media 2 (1 mL/well of 6-well plate)

  7. Transfer cells into cryovials at 1 mL/vial at 1-3 x106 (1 vial/well of 6-well plate).

  8. Immediately, place the cryovials into a Mr. Frosty® Freezing Container, place at −70°C, overnight.

Note: Cryovials must be moved to a liquid nitrogen vapor tank for long-term storage.

Thawing of primary fibroblasts

  • 9.

    Thaw 1 vial of frozen cells in hand or in 37°C bead bath.

  • 10.

    Immediately transfer the cells to a 15 mL tube with 9 mL pre-warmed bat primary fibroblasts culture media.

  • 11.

    Centrifuge the cells at 1000 rpm for 5 min at RT.

  • 12.

    Remove the supernatant, resuspend the cell pellet in 10 mL of pre-warmed bat primary fibroblasts culture media.

  • 13.

    Seed the cells in a T25 cell culture flask. Incubate cells at 37°C, with 5% CO2.

Basic Protocol 3: Lentiviral transduction of bat primary fibroblasts

Genome editing is an important tool for gene functional analysis and genetic therapies. However, genome editing in low-passage primary cells is historically difficult due to their high physiological relevance to in vivo cells. Lentiviral particles are well known for their ability to deliver genetic molecules efficiently and stably into a variety of target cells. To test the possibility of whether bat primary fibroblasts can be genetically modified, we produced lentiviral particles and transduced the bat wing primary fibroblasts. Fig. 7 represents the lentiviral transduction of bat wing primary fibroblasts.

Lentivirus production

Day 1: Seed 293T cells.

  1. Plate 293T cells at 2.0x106 cells per well in a 6-well plate in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1x GlutaMax (3 mL/well) and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2 (90-99% confluency at time of transfection).

Day 2: Transfection

  • 2.

    Bring out Opti-MEM reduced serum medium to room temperature (RT).

  • 3.

    On the early morning of lentivirus packaging day, aspirate the media from the 293T cells culture dish and add 2 mL lentivirus packaging media (pre-warmed).

  • 4.

    Add 7 μL Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection Reagent to a microcentrifuge tube with 250 μL Opti-MEM Reduced serum medium in a 1.5 mL tube. Mix well.

  • 5.

    Add 1.25 μg of lentiviral expression plasmid pIB2-SEC13-mEGFP, 1 μg of psPAX2 and 0.25 μg pMD2.G, 6 μL P3000 Enhancer reagent to another 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube with 250 μL Opti-MEM reduced serum medium. Mix well.

  • 6.

    Prepare lipid-DNA complexes by adding the solution from step 4 to the solution from step 5. Mix well. Incubate at RT for 15 min.

  • 7.

    Remove 1 mL of the lentivirus packaging media from each 293T culture well, leaving 1 mL in each well.

  • 8.

    Add the 500 μL lipid-DNA complexes dropwise to the cells.

  • 9.

    Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 6 hrs (hours).

  • 10.

    Carefully aspirate the media containing lipid-DNA complexes from the 293T cells culture dish and add 3 mL bat primary fibroblast culture media without Amphotericin b, or Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) (pre-warmed).

  • 11.

    Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Note: bat primary fibroblast culture media without Amphotericin b, or P/S was used to collect lentivirus to avoid the stress from media during the transduction step.

Day 4: first batch of lentivirus collection

  • 12.

    At 48 h post transfection, collect the 3 mL media containing virus from each well into a 15 mL tube and store at 4°C.

  • 13.

    Add 3 mL of fresh bat primary fibroblast culture media without Amphotericin b, or Penicillin/Streptomycin (pre-warmed) to each well.

  • 14.

    Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Day 5: second batch of lentivirus collection

  • 15.

    At 72 h post transfection, collect the 3 mL viral supernatant from each well and combine with that from the first collection.

  • 16.

    Filter through a 0.45 μM filter, and store at 4°C for up to 1 week.

Note: For long term storage, aliquot virus, and store at −80°C.

Lentiviral transduction of bat primary fibroblasts

Day 0. Seed cells

  1. Seed 3.0x105 cells in a 12-well plate in 1 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media (60-75% confluency at time of transduction).

  2. Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2 overnight.

Day 1. EGFP Lentiviral transduction of bat primary fibroblasts

  • 3.

    Aspirate the media from the culture dish (12-well).

  • 4.

    Add 1 mL GFP lentivirus supernatant and 2 μl 4 mg/mL polybrene to the cells (polybrene working concentration 8 μg/ml).

  • 5.

    Centrifuge the cells at 1000 g for 2 hrs at RT.

  • 6.

    Transfer cells to cell culture incubator (37°C with 5% CO2).

  • 7.

    At 24 h post transduction, replace the media with fresh bat primary fibroblasts culture media.

  • 8.

    Check the transduction efficiency under florescent microscope at 2 days post transduction (Fig. 7A) and sort cells by cytometry to count GFP positive cells (Fig. 7B)

Basic Protocol 4: Bat stable fibroblast cell line development

One of the major issues of primary cell culture is their limited proliferation ability in culture (Hayflick, 1965), which can be a challenge for long-term experiments that require large number of cells. Immortalizing cell lines is a common strategy to overcome the limited lifespan of primary cells. There are several strategies that can be applied to immortalize cell lines. One of the important strategies is stable expression of Simian virus 40 T-antigen (SV40T), which would promote DNA replication and host cell division through suppressing the tumor suppressor proteins such as P53 and retinoblastoma (Rb) (Stacey & MacDonald, 2001; Sullivan & Pipas, 2002). Another commonly employed strategy is stable expression of the catalytic subunit of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), which is an enzyme that maintains telomere length, preventing cell senescence (He et al., 2009; Meyerson, 1998). Here, we describe bat fibroblast immortalization through introduction and stable expression of hTERT, SV40 large T-antigen or both under CMV promoter.

Day 0. Seed cells

  1. Seed 1.5x105 cells in a 24-well plate in 0.5 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media (60-75% confluency at time of transduction).

Note: passage 3 cells of both species were used for immortalization.

  1. Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Day 1. hTERT and SV40 Large T-antigen Lentiviral transduction of bat primary fibroblasts

  • 3.

    Thaw hTERT and SV40 large T-antigen Lentivirus at RT.

  • 4.

    Add 50 μL hTERT lentivirus (or 50 μl SV40 large T-antigen lentivirus, or 50 μL hTERT and SV40 large T-antigen lentivirus) to each well of the 24-well plate cultured with bat primary fibroblasts.

  • 5.

    Centrifuge the cells at 1000g for 2 hrs at RT.

  • 6.

    Transfer cells to cell culture incubator (37°C with 5% CO2).

  • 7.

    At 24 h post transduction, replace the media with fresh bat primary fibroblast culture media. Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Day 3. Start selection by adding puromycin.

  • 8.
    At 48 h post transduction, replace the media with fresh bat primary fibroblast culture media with 2 μg/mL puromycin.
    Note: kill curved assay should be done to decide the puromycin concentration before selection.
  • 9.

    Change media with 2 μg/mL puromycin every other day.

  • 10.

    Subculture cells when the culture is approximately 90% confluent.

  • 11.
    Confirm fibroblast cell line after 2 weeks of puromycin selection by Immunofluorescence (IF) staining and fluorescent microscope imaging.
    Note: One bat cell line (P.meso-hTERT/SV40-GFP) developed through hTERT/SV40 Large T-antigen transduction has been cultured for more than 30 passages.
    Note: The immortalized cells morphology becomes more consistent over time (Fig. 8C).

Support Protocol 5: Bat fibroblast validation by immunofluorescence staining (IF staining)

The bat primary fibroblasts derived from the frozen wing biopsy and the immortalized fibroblast line can be characterized through IF staining to confirm fibroblast specific markers, such as alpha smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) and vimentin. Here, we describe IF staining for bat fibroblast validation.

Additional Materials (other materials are included in basic protocols 1 and 2)

  • 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution in PBS

  • PBS

  • Triton X-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #. 85111)

  • SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking buffer (ThermoFisher, Cat # 37580)

  • Anti-Vimentin (Millipore Sigma, Cat # AB1620) (used at 1:40)

  • Alexa FluorTM 647 Phalloidin (ThermoFisher, Cat # A22287) (diluted in SuperBlock Blocking buffer (1:40))

  • Anti-SMA (Agilent, Cat # 76542) (used at 1:50)

  • Donkey anti-goat IgG (Biotium, Cat # 20016) (used at 1:500)

  • Donkey anti-mouse IgG (Biotium, Cat # 20105) (used at 1:500)

  • DAPI (Biolegend, Cat # 422801) (used at 1:500)

  • ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher, Cat # P10144)

  • Circle glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific, Cat # 12-545-82-12Cir-1D).
    1. Seed 2.0x105 cells on coverslips in a 12-well plate.
    2. Incubate the cells at 37°C with 5% CO2, until cells reach 70-90% confluency.
    3. Remove supernatant, and rinse cells with PBS one time.
    4. Add 1 mL 4% PFA to cells, and incubate at RT for 30 min.
    5. Remove 4% PFA and add 1 mL PBS buffer with 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBST) to cells, incubate 5 min at RT.
    6. Remove PBST and add 1 mL fresh PBST to cells, incubate 45 min at RT for permeabilization.
    7. Remove PBST and add 1 mL SuperBlock Blocking buffer to cells. Incubate 45 min at RT.
    8. Remove SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking buffer. Add 500 μL primary antibodies diluted in SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking buffer to cells. Incubate at 4°C overnight.
    9. Remove primary antibodies. Rinse the cells with 1 mL PBST, 5x5 min.
    10. Remove PBST and add 500 μL secondary antibodies diluted in SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking buffer and DAPI to the cells and incubate in dark at RT for 1 h.
    11. Rinse the cells with 1 mL PBST for 5x5 min.
    12. Remove PBST, and rinse cells with 1 mL PBS once.
    13. Mount the cells with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant on microscope slide.
    14. Proceed for imaging. (Fig. 8)
    Note: IF staining results showed that all the p3 primary cells and cell lines developed in this protocol express fibroblasts specific markers (Fig. 8A, B).

Basic Protocol 5: Chromosome counting.

Chromosome counting, also known as karyotyping, is a crucial technique in genetics and cytogenetics. In cell culture, it is a valuable tool for ensuring the authenticity, stability, and genetic integrity of cell lines. Here we describe the chromosome counting method to verify the bat primary fibroblasts genetic integrity.

Note: Need to prepare fresh Fixative each time before experiment.

  1. Culture bat primary fibroblasts in 8 mL bat primary fibroblast culture media in T25 cell culture flask at 37°C with 5% CO2, until cells reach 50-60% confluency.

  2. Add 50 μL colcemid (working concentration 50 ng/ml) to the cells for 3 hrs.
    Note: Add colcemid to the same growth media, do not change the media.
  3. Remove the media.

  4. Wash with 5 mL PBS.

  5. Add 3 mL TrypLE, and incubate for 5 min at 37 °C.

  6. Add 3 mL bat primary fibroblasts culture media to stop dissociation.

  7. Transfer cells to a 15 mL tube.

  8. Centrifuge at 1000 rpm for 5 min.

  9. Aspirate the supernatant, resuspend the cells with 1.5 mL bat primary fibroblast culture media.

  10. Add 10 mL of warmed (37 °C) KCl solution slowly, drop by drop, along the wall of the tube flicking the tube gently at the same time. Invert serval times.

  11. Incubate at 37 °C for 40 min.

  12. Add two or three drops of ice-cold fixative, invert the tube to mix.

  13. Centrifuge at 1000 rpm for 5 min.

  14. Aspirate the supernatant, leaving 1mL behind.

  15. Gently suspend cells.

  16. Add up to 5-10 mL of ice-cold fixative drop by drop and disperse the cells thoroughly in the fixative.

  17. Centrifuge at 1000 rpm for 5 min.

  18. Aspirate the supernatant, leaving 1mL behind.

  19. Gently suspend cells.

  20. Repeat step 16-19 at least three times.

  21. Resuspend the cells in 1-2 mL fixative.

  22. Drop the cell suspension (20 μL) onto a glass slide from a 10-cm distance.

  23. Air-dry the slides.
    Note: the fixative evaporates very fast. It takes about 2-3 min to dry.
  24. Mount the slides with VECTASHIELD® Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI and seal the slide with a coverslip.

  25. Proceed for imaging under florescent microscope (Fig. 9 A).

  26. Count the number of chromosomes in each spread (Fig. 9 B).
    Note: At least 40 good spreads should be counted and analyzed.

Commentary

Background Information

Fibroblasts are a type of connective tissue cell that maintains the structural integrity of all organs (Kendall & Feghali-Bostwick, 2014). They are responsible for producing and maintaining the ECM, which provides support and structure to surrounding cells. Fibroblasts play crucial roles in wound healing, inflammation, tissue regeneration, angiogenesis, cancer progression, pathological tissue fibrosis, and the advancement of virus infections (Kendall & Feghali-Bostwick, 2014). Lineage tracing and multiomics single-cell analyses have revealed that fibroblasts are diverse and retain an embryonic gene expression signature inherited from their organ of origin, offering new prospects for tissue-specific antifibrotic therapies (Forte et al., 2022). Given the significant roles of fibroblasts in various physiological and pathological processes, as well as their ease to work with, they have been utilized in numerous fields of research (Forte et al., 2022; Gaska et al., 2019; Hagai et al., 2018; Schneor et al., 2023). For example, Mitra et al. established an in vitro model of cellular quiescence in primary human dermal fibroblasts to study various disease states (Mitra, Ho, & Coller, 2018). Alsharabasy et al. developeded a protocol to create a skin fibrosis model using human dermal fibroblasts. This model can be employed for investigating the possible anti-fibrotic properties of specific chemical compounds (Alsharabasy & Pandit, 2021). Recently, human in vitro skin models were also dveloped for wound healing and wound healing disorders (Hofmann et al., 2023). Additionally, fibroblasts have also been used to study the mechanisms of host adaptation to viral infection (Schneor et al., 2023).

Isolating high-quality and a large number of primary fibroblasts is essential for developing in vitro fibroblast models. Various tissue dissociation methods are employed for fibroblast isolation from different tissues (Almazloum & Khalil, 2023; Belviso et al., 2020; Bravo, Kim, & Benayoun, 2021; Forte et al., 2022; Fuentes-Mateos, Santos, & Fernandez-Medarde, 2023; Henrot et al., 2020; R. Li, Gong, & Zhang, 2017; Mitra et al., 2018; Przekora, Zarnowski, & Ginalska, 2017; Sierra-Sanchez et al., 2023; Stellato, Czepiel, Distler, Blyszczuk, & Kania, 2019; Waise et al., 2019). For isolation of primary fibroblasts from the skin dermis, multiple protocols have been developed with each differing in enzymatic digestions and mechanical dissociation (Bravo et al., 2021; Henrot et al., 2020; Sierra-Sanchez et al., 2023). Yohe et al. described a protocol for primary fibroblast isolation from fresh bat wing biopsies. They used collagenase IV to dissociate the skin and were able to observe attached cells approximately 24 hours after cell plating (Yohe et al., 2019). However, it did not work for isolating primary fibroblasts from frozen bat wing biopsy (in this study, the first shot for isolating primary fibroblasts from frozen bat wing biopsy), where cell integrity and viability are lower than in fresh tissue. Therefore, developing or optimizing a robust, standardized, high-yield protocol for isolation of primary fibroblasts from frozen bat wing biopsy is necessary for bat and other wild animal studies.

Critical Parameters

By following this protocol, we have been able to successfully isolate, culture and expand primary fibroblasts from adult bat frozen wing biopsy of two bat species: P. Mesoamericanus (P. Meso) and M. Schmidtorum (M. Sch). The size of the frozen wing biopsy, freezing method, bat age, sex, and species might affect the time of primary cell release from tissue explants. For primary fibroblast isolation from P. Meso frozen wing biopsy, attached cells were observed at 2 days post cell derivation, while it took 5 days to detect the attached cells for M. Sch. The frozen tissue size from P. Meso wing biopsy was about 3x3 mm before cryopreservation (non-lethal), while M. Sch wing biopsy was cryopreserved as 1x1 cm (lethal sample). Despite the difference in the time required to obtain the primary cells, we were able to obtain a large number of cells from both species, indicating that the tissue itself might be an important variable in this difference. The bat wing web skin is highly folded and comprised of two epidermal layers separated by a central core of dermal connective tissue (Makanya & Mortola, 2007). Fibroblasts are embedded in the dermal connective tissue (Fig. 1A). Thus, splitting the epidermis from the dermis is critical to exposure dermal connective tissue containing fibroblasts for further step fibroblasts isolation. Dispase is a type of matrix metalloprotease which can split epidermal and dermal sheets (Henrot et al., 2020; Marquet et al., 2011; Supp, Hahn, Combs, McFarland, & Powell, 2022). And we found that it is a critical step for successful isolation of primary fibroblasts from bat frozen wing biopsy. Without dispase digestion, little cells were detected after 2 weeks, while it only takes 2-5 days to observe primary cells sprouting from the biopsy tissue.

Cell culture media plays a crucial role in primary cell culture, influencing cell growth, viability, and functionality (Przekora et al., 2017). Advanced DMEM/F-12 was employed for bat fibroblasts culture in this protocol, as it contains ethanolamine, glutathione, ascorbic acid, insulin, transferrin, AlbuMAX II lipid-rich bovine serum albumin, and trace elements including sodium selenite, ammonium metavanadate, cupric sulfate, manganous chloride, as well as non-essential amino acids. These compounds are thought to benefit fibroblasts in culture and maintain their proliferation and functionality. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF or FGF-2) was also added to bat fibroblasts culture media to promote fibroblasts viability and proliferation. Comparing the growth curve and doubling time of bat primary fibroblasts cultured in bat fibroblast culture media and normal fibroblast media indicates that bat fibroblast culture media had a significant impact on the proliferation ability of bat primary fibroblasts. (Fig. 5). So, bat fibroblast culture media might be another key factor for the successful derivation of primary fibroblasts from frozen wing biopsies. With the bat fibroblast culture media, the pieces of wing tissue explants were able to survive for more than 100 days and continue releasing cells (Fig. 4), indicating that bat fibroblast culture media can maintain cell viability for long time.

Troubleshooting Guide for derivation of bat primary fibroblasts from adult bat frozen wing biopsy and stable cell lines development

Common problems, possible causes, and suggested solutions are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Troubleshooting Commonly Encountered Problems.

Problem Possible cause Solution
Cells not attached Low cell viability Bad tissue dissociation Non-treated vessel surface Add Rock inhibitor Y-27632 (10 μM) to increase the viability (Claassen, Desler, & Rizzino, 2009; Rajendran et al., 2023).
Coat the culture vessel surface with 0.1% gelatin (Mogha, Iyer, & Majumder, 2023).
Use dispase to split epidermal and dermal sheets (Henrot et al., 2020).
Low cell viability and proliferation Tissue freezing problem Unsuitable cell culture media Cut wing biopsy into small pieces before freezing the tissue.
Use good dissociation method.
Use bat fibroblasts culture media.
Some samples grow slower than others. sample-to-sample differences sample size Subculture cells when the cells reach >70% confluency.
Use enough tissue for primary cell derivation.
Low transduction efficiency Low lentivirus packaging efficiency Transduction method Packaging lentivirus following the protocol.
Decrease cell number while increase lentivirus amount. Use spinoculation transduction protocol

Understanding Results

By following basic protocol 2, healthy and actively proliferating bat primary fibroblasts can be obtained within 2 weeks. The time to obtain enough number of primary fibroblasts might be different due to tissue size, bat species, or age. This protocol enables the isolation of the different cell populations from the bat wing biopsy (Fig. 3D). Different types of cells can be detected at P0 (Fig. 3D). With bat primary fibroblast media, fibroblasts become enriched during the cell culture. The results of fibroblast molecular marker staining indicate that all primary cells at P3 are alpha-SMA and vimentin positive cells. (Fig. 8A).

Bat primary fibroblasts grow fast. More than 20e6 cells can be obtained within 3 weeks from 1 cm X 1 cm frozen wing biopsy. We found that bat wing explants cultured in the bat fibroblast culture media were able to survive for more than 100 days and continually release cells. This might be due to the suitability of the cell culture conditions for the bat wing explant or the special characteristics of the bat wing tissue. Both P. Meso and M. Sch primary fibroblasts cell lines were able to be propagated healthily for more than 20 passages. This is surprising because primary fibroblasts from other mammals, such as mouse or human, can only be subcultured for a limited time (usually < 10 passages). These results might indicate that our fibroblast cell culture conditions are conducive to fibroblast viability and proliferation, or that bat fibroblasts differ from those of other mammals and auto-immortalize. To date, the immortalized cells have been propagated for 22 passages.

Time Considerations

The procedure timeline estimation is detailed below:

Bat wing biopsy collection and cryopreservation (approx. 2 hours per bat)

Bat frozen wing biopsy dispase digestion (approx. 90 min)

Collagenase IV dissociation (approx. 12-14 hours)

Trypsin-EDTA dissociation (approx. 15 min)

Cell collection (approx. 10 min)

Primary fibroblast cell cultures (approx. 5 to 10 days)

Bat stable fibroblasts cell lines development (>3 weeks)

IF staining (approx. 2 days)

Acknowledgments

The fieldwork was carried out within the framework of the informally dubbed “Belize Bat-a-thon”, founded by Dr. Brock Fenton and co-organized by Dr. Nancy Simmons and we thank everyone for the field support. The authors would like to thank the Stowers Institute for Medical Research technology centers: Cells, Tissues, and Organoids Center members for the meaningful discussion throughout protocol optimization; Media Preparation Center for preparing media. We also thank Scientific Illustrator Mark Miller for creating the bat wing structure image and the overview of bat wing fibroblasts derivation in Figure 2. We acknowledge that the pIB2-SEC13-mEGFP plasmid was gifted from Dr. Subu Ramanathan. This work was supported by NIH grant 1DP2AG071466-01 to NR for the field study. Supplemental funding was provided by the NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology #2109717 to J.C., the BWF PDEP grant (G-1022339) to J.C., and the HHMI Hanna H. Gray Fellows Program (GT15991) to J.C. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF, BWF, or HHMI.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Data Availability Statement

Original data underlying this manuscript can be accessed from the Stowers Original Data Repository at http://www.stowers.org/research/publications/libpb-2487

Literature Cited

  1. Ahn M, Anderson DE, Zhang Q, Tan CW, Lim BL, Luko K, … Wang LF (2019). Dampened NLRP3-mediated inflammation in bats and implications for a special viral reservoir host. Nat Microbiol, 4(5), 789–799. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0371-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almazloum A, & Khalil H (2023). Isolation of Adult Mouse Cardiac Fibroblasts. Curr Protoc, 3(7), e840. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alsharabasy AM, & Pandit A (2021). Protocol for in vitro skin fibrosis model to screen the biological effects of antifibrotic compounds. STAR Protoc, 2(1), 100387. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altringham JD (2011). Bats: From Evolution to Conservation New York: Oxford University Press. doi:9780199207114.002.0007 [Google Scholar]
  5. Belviso I, Sacco AM, Romano V, Schonauer F, Nurzynska D, Montagnani S, … Castaldo C (2020). Isolation of Adult Human Dermal Fibroblasts from Abdominal Skin and Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using a Non-Integrating Method. J Vis Exp(155). doi: 10.3791/60629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bondarenco A, Kortner G, & Geiser F (2014). Hot bats: extreme thermal tolerance in a desert heat wave. Naturwissenschaften, 101(8), 679–685. doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1202-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bravo JI, Kim M, & Benayoun BA (2021). Protocol for isolation of adult mouse ear pinnae-derived primary fibroblasts. STAR Protoc, 2(2), 100406. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brook CE, Boots M, Chandran K, Dobson AP, Drosten C, Graham AL, … van Leeuwen A (2020). Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence. Elife, 9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calisher CH, Childs JE, Field HE, Holmes KV, & Schountz T (2006). Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev, 19(3), 531–545. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00017-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Claassen DA, Desler MM, & Rizzino A (2009). ROCK inhibition enhances the recovery and growth of cryopreserved human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol Reprod Dev, 76(8), 722–732. doi: 10.1002/mrd.21021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crameri G, Todd S, Grimley S, McEachern JA, Marsh GA, Smith C, … Wang LF (2009). Establishment, immortalisation and characterisation of pteropid bat cell lines. PLoS One, 4(12), e8266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson S, Coles M, Thomas T, Kollias G, Ludewig B, Turley S, … Buckley CD (2021). Fibroblasts as immune regulators in infection, inflammation and cancer. Nat Rev Immunol, 21(11), 704–717. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00540-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis R. a. D. SE (1972). Wing repair in pallid bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 53(2), 377–378. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dejosez M, Marin A, Hughes GM, Morales AE, Godoy-Parejo C, Gray JL, … Zwaka TP (2023). Bat pluripotent stem cells reveal unusual entanglement between host and viruses. Cell, 186(5), 957–974 e928. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foley NM, Hughes GM, Huang Z, Clarke M, Jebb D, Whelan CV, … Teeling EC (2018). Growing old, yet staying young: The role of telomeres in bats' exceptional longevity. Sci Adv, 4(2), eaao0926. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao0926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Forte E, Ramialison M, Nim HT, Mara M, Li JY, Cohn R, … Furtado MB (2022). Adult mouse fibroblasts retain organ-specific transcriptomic identity. Elife, 11. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuentes-Mateos R, Santos E, & Fernandez-Medarde A (2023). Optimized Protocol for Isolation and Culture of Murine Neonatal Primary Lung Fibroblasts. Methods Protoc, 6(1). doi: 10.3390/mps6010014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galvan I, Garrido-Fernandez J, Rios J, Perez-Galvez A, Rodriguez-Herrera B, & Negro JJ (2016). Tropical bat as mammalian model for skin carotenoid metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113(39), 10932–10937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609724113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaska JM, Parsons L, Balev M, Cirincione A, Wang W, Schwartz RE, & Ploss A (2019). Conservation of cell-intrinsic immune responses in diverse nonhuman primate species. Life Sci Alliance, 2(5). doi: 10.26508/lsa.201900495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, & Kennedy BK (2020). The World Goes Bats: Living Longer and Tolerating Viruses. Cell Metab, 32(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Greville LJ, Ceballos-Vasquez A, Valdizón-Rodríguez R, Caldwell JR and Faure PA (2018). Wound healing in wing membranes of the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus). Journal of Mammalogy, 99(4), 974–982. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagai T, Chen X, Miragaia RJ, Rostom R, Gomes T, Kunowska N, … Teichmann SA (2018). Gene expression variability across cells and species shapes innate immunity. Nature, 563(7730), 197–202. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0657-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayflick L. (1965). The Limited in Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains. Exp Cell Res, 37, 614–636. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. He YL, Wu YH, He XN, Liu FJ, He XY, & Zhang Y (2009). An immortalized goat mammary epithelial cell line induced with human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene transfer. Theriogenology, 71(9), 1417–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Henrot P, Laurent P, Levionnois E, Leleu D, Pain C, Truchetet ME, & Cario M (2020). A Method for Isolating and Culturing Skin Cells: Application to Endothelial Cells, Fibroblasts, Keratinocytes, and Melanocytes From Punch Biopsies in Systemic Sclerosis Skin. Front Immunol, 11, 566607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.566607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hirakawa H, & Nagasaka Y (2018). Evidence for Ussurian tube-nosed bats (Murina ussuriensis) hibernating in snow. Sci Rep, 8(1), 12047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30357-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hofmann E, Fink J, Pignet AL, Schwarz A, Schellnegger M, Nischwitz SP, … Kotzbeck P (2023). Human In Vitro Skin Models for Wound Healing and Wound Healing Disorders. Biomedicines, 11(4). doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Irving AT, Ahn M, Goh G, Anderson DE, & Wang LF (2021). Lessons from the host defences of bats, a unique viral reservoir. Nature, 589(7842), 363–370. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03128-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kendall RT, & Feghali-Bostwick CA (2014). Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol, 5, 123. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kunz TH, Braun de Torrez E, Bauer D, Lobova T, & Fleming TH (2011). Ecosystem services provided by bats. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1223, 1–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06004.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leendertz SA, Gogarten JF, Dux A, Calvignac-Spencer S, & Leendertz FH (2016). Assessing the Evidence Supporting Fruit Bats as the Primary Reservoirs for Ebola Viruses. Ecohealth, 13(1), 18–25. doi: 10.1007/s10393-015-1053-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li R, Gong K, & Zhang Z (2017). [Isolation, purification and primary culture of adult mouse cardiac fibroblasts]. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi, 33(1), 67–71. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031118 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li W, Shi Z, Yu M, Ren W, Smith C, Epstein JH, … Wang LF (2005). Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science, 310(5748), 676–679. doi: 10.1126/science.1118391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Makanya AN, & Mortola JP (2007). The structural design of the bat wing web and its possible role in gas exchange. J Anat, 211(6), 687–697. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00817.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marquet F, Bonneau M, Pascale F, Urien C, Kang C, Schwartz-Cornil I, & Bertho N (2011). Characterization of dendritic cells subpopulations in skin and afferent lymph in the swine model. PLoS One, 6(1), e16320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez-Cerdeno V, Camacho J, Ariza J, Rogers H, Horton-Sparks K, Kreutz A, … Noctor SC (2018). The Bat as a New Model of Cortical Development. Cereb Cortex, 28(11), 3880–3893. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meissner A, Wernig M, & Jaenisch R (2007). Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol, 25(10), 1177–1181. doi: 10.1038/nbt1335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Memish ZA, Mishra N, Olival KJ, Fagbo SF, Kapoor V, Epstein JH, … Lipkin WI (2013). Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bats, Saudi Arabia. Emerg Infect Dis, 19(11), 1819–1823. doi: 10.3201/eid1911.131172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Meyerson M. (1998). Telomerase enzyme activation and human cell immortalization. Toxicol Lett, 102-103, 41–45. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00278-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mitra M, Ho LD, & Coller HA (2018). An In Vitro Model of Cellular Quiescence in Primary Human Dermal Fibroblasts. Methods Mol Biol, 1686, 27–47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7371-2_2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mizoguchi F, Slowikowski K, Wei K, Marshall JL, Rao DA, Chang SK, … Brenner MB (2018). Functionally distinct disease-associated fibroblast subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Commun, 9(1), 789. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02892-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mogha P, Iyer S, & Majumder A (2023). Extracellular matrix protein gelatin provides higher expansion, reduces size heterogeneity, and maintains cell stiffness in a long-term culture of mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell, 80, 101969. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2022.101969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Olival KJ, & Hayman DT (2014). Filoviruses in bats: current knowledge and future directions. Viruses, 6(4), 1759–1788. doi: 10.3390/v6041759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pollock T, Moreno CR, Sánchez L, Ceballos-Vasquez A, Faure PA and Mora EC (2016). Wound healing in the flight membranes of wild big brown bats. The Journal of Wildlife Management(80(1)), 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  45. Prat Y, Taub M, & Yovel Y (2015). Vocal learning in a social mammal: Demonstrated by isolation and playback experiments in bats. Sci Adv, 1(2), e1500019. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Przekora A, Zarnowski T, & Ginalska G (2017). A simple and effective protocol for fast isolation of human Tenon's fibroblasts from a single trabeculectomy biopsy - a comparison of cell behaviour in different culture media. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 22, 5. doi: 10.1186/s11658-017-0034-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rajendran N, Deng F, Wang Y, Kenzior O, Krishnan J, Biswas T, … Zhao C (2023). Establishment, Long-Term Maintenance, and Characterization of Primary Liver Cells from Astyanax mexicanus. Curr Protoc, 3(4), e736. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schneor L, Kaltenbach S, Friedman S, Tussia-Cohen D, Nissan Y, Shuler G, … Hagai T (2023). Comparison of antiviral responses in two bat species reveals conserved and divergent innate immune pathways. iScience, 26(8), 107435. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Secretariat G. (2023). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset 10.15468/39omei accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-03-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Seetahal JFR, Greenberg L, Satheshkumar PS, Sanchez-Vazquez MJ, Legall G, Singh S, … Carrington CVF (2020). The Serological Prevalence of Rabies Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in the Bat Population on the Caribbean Island of Trinidad. Viruses, 12(2). doi: 10.3390/v12020178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sierra-Sanchez A, Barbier MA, Magne B, Larouche D, Arias-Santiago S, & Germain L (2023). Comparison of Two Human Skin Cell Isolation Protocols and Their Influence on Keratinocyte and Fibroblast Culture. Int J Mol Sci, 24(19). doi: 10.3390/ijms241914712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Simmons NB, Seymour KL, Habersetzer J, & Gunnell GF (2008). Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation. Nature, 451(7180), 818–821. doi: 10.1038/nature06549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stacey G, & MacDonald C (2001). Immortalisation of primary cells. Cell Biol Toxicol, 17(4-5), 231–246. doi: 10.1023/a:1012525014791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stellato M, Czepiel M, Distler O, Blyszczuk P, & Kania G (2019). Identification and Isolation of Cardiac Fibroblasts From the Adult Mouse Heart Using Two-Color Flow Cytometry. Front Cardiovasc Med, 6, 105. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Studier EH (1969). Respiratory ammonia filtration, mucous composition and ammonia tolerance in bats. J Exp Zool, 170(3), 253–258. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401700302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sullivan CS, & Pipas JM (2002). T antigens of simian virus 40: molecular chaperones for viral replication and tumorigenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 66(2), 179–202. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.2.179-202.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Supp DM, Hahn JM, Combs KA, McFarland KL, & Powell HM (2022). Isolation and feeder-free primary culture of four cell types from a single human skin sample. STAR Protoc, 3(1), 101172. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Temmam S, Vongphayloth K, Baquero E, Munier S, Bonomi M, Regnault B, … Eloit M (2022). Bat coronaviruses related to SARS-CoV-2 and infectious for human cells. Nature, 604(7905), 330–336. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04532-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Toledo S, Shohami D, Schiffner I, Lourie E, Orchan Y, Bartan Y, & Nathan R (2020). Cognitive map-based navigation in wild bats revealed by a new high-throughput tracking system. Science, 369(6500), 188–193. doi: 10.1126/science.aax6904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tuttle M. D. a. S. DE,. (2011). Variation in the cave environment and its biological implications. In BCI bat conservation and management workshop–Arizona 19–35. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wadhwa A, Wilkins K, Gao J, Condori Condori RE, Gigante CM, Zhao H, … Li Y (2017). A Pan-Lyssavirus Taqman Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Highly Variable Rabies virus and Other Lyssaviruses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 11(1), e0005258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Waise S, Parker R, Rose-Zerilli MJJ, Layfield DM, Wood O, West J, … Hanley CJ (2019). An Optimized Method to Isolate Human Fibroblasts from Tissue for ex vivo Analysis. Bio Protoc, 9(23), e3440. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wilkinson GS, Adams DM, Haghani A, Lu AT, Zoller J, Breeze CE, … Horvath S (2021). DNA methylation predicts age and provides insight into exceptional longevity of bats. Nat Commun, 12(1), 1615. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21900-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yohe LR, Devanna P, Davies KTJ, Potter JHT, Rossiter SJ, Teeling EC, … Davalos LM (2019). Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture. J Vis Exp(152). doi: 10.3791/59505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhou J, Li C, Liu X, Chiu MC, Zhao X, Wang D, … Yuen KY (2020). Infection of bat and human intestinal organoids by SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med, 26(7), 1077–1083. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0912-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Original data underlying this manuscript can be accessed from the Stowers Original Data Repository at http://www.stowers.org/research/publications/libpb-2487

RESOURCES