Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309482

Increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia in Hailey-Hailey disease patients

William Jebril 1,2, Philip Curman 1,2,3, Daniel C Andersson 4,5, Henrik Larsson 6, Etty Bachar-Wikstrom 1, Martin Cederlöf 3,6, Jakob D Wikstrom 1,2,*
Editor: Albert Rübben7
PMCID: PMC11379163  PMID: 39241028

Abstract

Background

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is a rare autosomal dominant skin disease caused by mutations in the ATP2C1 gene, which encodes the secretory Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPase (SPCA1) pump in the Golgi apparatus. Although ATP2C1 is ubiquitously expressed in the body, possible extracutaneous manifestations of HHD are unknown. However, dysfunction of the Golgi apparatus not specifically coupled to ATP2C1 has been associated with heart disease.

Objective

To investigate the association between HHD and common heart disease in a Swedish, population-based cohort.

Methods

We conducted a population-based cohort study based on a linkage of Swedish nationwide registers to investigate the relationship between HHD and heart disease. We have been granted ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority to conduct this study. The patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent to the publication of their case details. A total of 342 individuals with an ICD-10 diagnosis of HHD (Q82.8E) were identified and matched with randomly selected comparison individuals without HHD on a 1:100 ratio. Furthermore, in a separate clinical cohort we matched 23 HHD patients for age, sex, and BMI with control subjects to examine electrocardiogram parameters, electrolytes, and cardiovascular biomarkers.

Results

Compared with individuals without HHD, individuals with HHD had an excess risk of arrhythmia (RR 1.4, CI 1.0–2.0), whereas no increased risks of myocardial infarction (RR 1.1, CI 0.6–1.7) or heart failure (RR 1.0, CI 0.6–1.6; Table 1) were found. We found no difference in ECG parameters, cardiovascular biomarkers, and electrolytes in the clinical subset.

Conclusion

This study reveals that HHD is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia and represents the first data of any extracutaneous comorbidity in HHD. Thus, HHD may be a systemic disease. Our findings also shed light on the importance of the Golgi apparatus’ Ca2+/Mn2+ homeostasis in common heart disease.

Introduction

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is a rare skin disease with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and complete penetrance. Symptoms primarily arise in early adulthood, with painful recurring blisters and erosions. The disease has a predilection for skin folds, such as the axillae and groin area, and generalized skin symptoms are uncommon. Typically, a ubiquitously expressed mutation in the ATP2C1 gene that encodes the secretory Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPase (SPCA1) pump in the Golgi apparatus (GA) is the underlying cause. This is similar to Darier disease, which is caused by mutations in the ATP2A2 gene that encodes the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pump (SERCA2). While Darier disease is increasingly recognized as a systemic condition due to emerging evidence of extracutaneous involvement [14], no such evidence exists for HHD to date. It is, however, plausible, due to the ubiquitous expression of the disease-causing gene. Heart disease in particular is a likely comorbidity because of the importance of GA in heart excitation-contraction coupling [5]. Herein, we examine for the first time the association between HHD and common heart disease by utilizing a population-based cohort based on Swedish national register data, as well as a clinical patient cohort.

Materials and methods

We have been granted ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority to conduct this study. The patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent to the publication of their case details.

First, we conducted a population-based cohort study based on linkage between Swedish nationwide registers to investigate the relationship between HHD and cardiac abnormalities. The Total Population Register [6] holds demographic information of all Swedish inhabitants since 1968; The National Patient Register [7] includes inpatient diagnoses assigned by the treating physicians according to the International Classification of Diseases, since 1973 and outpatient diagnoses since 2001 [8]. 342 individuals with an ICD-10 diagnosis of HHD (Q82.8E) were identified and matched with comparison individuals without HHD on a 1:100 ratio. Comparison individuals were randomly selected from the general Swedish population. Successful matching was performed for birth year, sex, and county of residence at the time of the first HHD diagnosis of the index persons. This matching scheme is referred to as incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed for the associations between HHD and the major ICD groups of heart diseases (myocardial infarction [I21], heart failure [I42, I50], and arrhythmias [I47-49]) that could be delineated with sufficient statistical power. The results were expressed as odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals using the SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Secondly, from 2017-10-01 to 2017-11-01, we recruited 23 HHD (7 males and 16 females) patients from the dermatology department at the Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Inclusion criteria were phenotype-positive patients with a histopathological verified HHD and a family history of HHD. A family history of HHD was defined as the presence of a first- or second-degree relative with the disease verified at a dermatology clinic or hospital. Healthy controls were similarly recruited through advertisements at the dermatology clinic and on the Karolinska Institutet (Stockholm, Sweden) website. Patients underwent a thorough medical history and physical skin examination. We subsequently matched the HHD patients for age, sex, and BMI with healthy controls on a 1:1 ratio to investigate 12-lead electrocardiogram parameters, blood biomarkers (NT-proBNP, troponin T, sodium, potassium and calcium), and electrolytes to perform a clinical study to supplement our population-based study.

Results

In the population-based study, individuals with HHD showed an excess risk of arrhythmia diagnoses (RR 1.4, CI 1.0–2.0), whereas no statistically significant elevated risks could be confirmed for myocardial infarction (RR 1.1, CI 0.6–1.7), or heart failure (RR 1.0, CI 0.6–1.6; Table 1).

Table 1. Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and arrhythmia in individuals with HHD.

A total of 342 individuals with an ICD-10 diagnosis of HHD (Q82.8E) were identified and matched with comparison individuals without HHD on a 1:100 ratio, randomly selected from the general Swedish population (all individuals with HHD diagnosis since the start of the register included). Successful matching was performed for birth year, sex, and county of residence at the time of the first HHD diagnosis of the individual. This matching scheme is referred to as incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed for the associations between HHD and the major ICD groups of heart diseases: myocardial infarction [I21], heart failure [I42, I50], and arrhythmias. SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses. The results were expressed as odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. As a result of the incidence density sampling, odds ratios can be interpreted as risk ratios (RR). The table also shows the mean age and standard deviation (SD) at first arrhythmia diagnosis among individuals with HHD and comparison individuals. *Diagnoses included in arrhythmias: paroxysmal tachycardia [I47], atrial fibrillation and flutter [I48], and other cardiac arrhythmias [I49]. Within the group called other cardiac arrhythmias, there are ten arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation [I49.01], ventricular flutter [I49.02], atrial premature depolarization [I49.1], junctional premature polarization [I49.2], ventricular premature polarization [I49.3], unspecified premature polarization [I49.40], other premature polarization [I49.49], sick sinus syndrome [I49.5], other specified cardiac arrhythmias [I49.8] and cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified [I49.9].

Variable Sample size Mean ± standard deviation Unpaired t-Test
HHD Control HHD Control P-value
Age 23 23 53.6 ± 10 (33–75) 51.5 ± 10.9 (33–70) 0.51
Sex 23 (7M, 16F)** 23 (7M, 16F)**
ECG parameters
Heart rate (per minute) 23 23 63.30 ± 11.060 (45–85) 63.21 ± 10.023 (47–84) 0.977
PQ—interval (ms) 23 23 157.66 ± 20.482 (116–194) 155 ± 24.462 (108–210) 0.695
QRS—duration (ms) 23 23 92 ± 10.531 (78–112) 92.35 ± 9.810 (74–114) 0.906
QT—interval (ms) 23 23 411.57 ± 30.960 (348–498) 413.30 ± 28.855 (354–470) 0.845
QTc -interval (ms) 23 23 417.74 ± 20.633 (379–466) 420.61 ± 24.062 (368–455) 0.666
Bazzet formula
QTc-interval (ms) 23 23 416.10 ± 31.52 418.42 ± 20.86 0.301
Fridericia formula (388–456) (378–448)
QTc–interval (ms) 23 23 414.99 ± 38.99 417.65 ± 21.65 0.649
Framingham formula (385–451) (372–448)
QTc–interval (ms) 23 23 414.35 ± 36.74 418.24 ± 19.57 0.333
Hodges formula (387–474) (382–456)
Blood biomarkers and electrolytes
NT-proBNP (ng/L) 23 23 66.43 ± 55.717 (6–230) 94.09 ± 191.369 (11–954) 0.509
Troponin T (ng/L) 23 23 7.83 ± 10.360 (5–55) 5.26 ± 0.619 (5–7) 0.845
Sodium 23 23 140.87 ± 1.817 (138–145) 140.43 ± 1.805 (136–144) 0.420
Potassium 23 23 4.09 ± 0.251 (3.7–4.6) 4.02 ± 0.332 (3.4–4.8) 0.399
Calcium 23 23 2.39 ± 0.090 (2.22–2.58) 2.34 ± 0.071 (2.22–2.49) 0.037*

None of the patients in the clinical study suffered from cardiac diseases or arrhythmia, nor did they take medications or underlying comorbidities that could trigger cardiac disturbances. We found no statistically significant differences between the blood chemistry and EKG variables (Table 2). Total Ca2+ was slightly higher in the HHD group, although within the normal physiological range, and after multiple comparison corrections, this finding was insignificant.

Table 2. ECG parameters, blood biomarkers, and electrolytes from 23 HHD patients and matched healthy control subjects.

Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of HHD set by a dermatologist based on typical clinical appearance, histopathology, and family history. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, current pregnancy, active substance abuse, and acute illness in the past 4 weeks. The control group was matched for age, sex, and BMI.

Myocardial infarction Heart failure Arrhythmia*
N (%) RR (CI) N (%) RR (CI) N (%) RR (CI) Mean age in years (CI) at first diagnosis
Individuals with HHD, N = 342 20 (5.9) 1.1 (0.6–1.8) 20 (5.9) 1.1 (0.6–1.7) 40 (11.7) 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 67.7 (63.5:72.0)
Comparison individuals without HHD, N = 34,200 1,917 (5.6) 1,917 (5.6) 3,047 (8.9) 71.6.0 (71.5;71.6)

*After multiple comparisons with Bonferroni post hoc correction, none of the p-values are significant (p<0.005).

** M = males, F = females.

Discussion

Our population-based study reveal that HHD is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia, and these findings represent the first data of any extracutaneous comorbidity in HHD.

Skin disease and heart comorbidities

Several skin diseases are linked with heart comorbidities. For example, the inflammation in common psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa is thought to cause a higher prevalence of the cardiovascular disease. Numerous rare genetic skin disorders also have a skin-heart connection. H syndrome, caused by autosomal recessive mutations in the SLC29A3 gene that encodes the human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 3 (hENT3), a protein found in endosomes, lysosomes, and mitochondria, is clinically characterized by cutaneous hyperpigmentation, hypertrichosis, hepatosplenomegaly, and hypogonadism as well as heart anomalies [9]. Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), caused by autosomal dominant mutations in either TSC1 or TSC2 that causes a plethora of cellular dysfunctions due to mTOR inhibition, has heart symptoms in the form of rhabdomyomas in addition to other organ involvements such as the skin and brain [10]. Darier disease, which is pathophysiologically very similar to HHD as it is caused by mutations in ATP2A2 that encodes the SERCA2, thus upstream in the cells’ secretory pathway, is associated with heart failure [1] as well as diabetes [3], cognitive impairment [2] and several psychiatric disorders [11].

There are several examples of monogenic syndromes with congenital heart disease that also show skin pathologies such as loose skin (Marfan Syndrome), excess nuchal skin (Noonan syndrome), skin tags (Duane-radial ray syndrome), and dark skin (Costello syndrome) [12]. Furthermore, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), usually caused by mutations in PKP2 that encode for the desmosome-related protein plakophilin 2, causes loss of cell-to-cell adhesion in both skin and heart [13]. Desmosomal dysfunction is, in fact, considered the underlying cause in several conditions with a heart-skin connection [14, 15]. Our finding is that HHD, histologically characterized by acantholysis due to loss of intercellular connections, is associated with arrhythmia and thus fits with previous data from other diseases. Apart from a single case of suspected liver involvement [16], extracutaneous manifestations are unknown in HHD.

Golgi apparatus and heart disease

The Golgi apparatus (GA) is a complex organelle in the secretory pathway and is divided into compartments. The cis-Golgi receives lipids and proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum, while the trans-Golgi packages and transports modified proteins. The GA is responsible for lipidation and glycosylation and also plays a vital role in cell signaling and regulation of protein activity [5]. Furthermore, the GA forms lysosomes which degrade and recycle molecules delivered by endocytosis, phagocytosis, and autophagy. These Golgi functions are crucial for most cells, including cardiomyocytes. Lysosome dysfunction has been implicated in Danon disease, a rare x-linked lysosomal disease with cardiomyopathy, skeletal myopathy, and cognitive dysfunction [17]. Since the GA also is responsible for directing newly synthesized cardiac ion channel proteins to their appropriate sarcolemma-bound locations [18], and dysfunction of the GA has been associated with atrial fibrillation when sections of the left atrial free wall were analyzed [19], it is likely that perturbations to the GA could play a role in excitation–contraction coupling and the cardiac action potential which may explain the increased frequency of arrhythmia in HHD. Although further mechanistic research is needed, our study indicates an important role for the SPCA1 pump in the heart. Extracutaneous manifestations are unknown in HHD, and the potential systemic effects of ATP2C1 mutations have not been studied. This paper provides new knowledge on the relationship between the GA and HHD and their cardiac manifestations.

SPCA1 function and cardiac health

To the best of our knowledge, there are no available studies indicating that SPCA1 dysfunction leads to heart disease in humans. In terms of preclinical studies, there is only one study that examines heart development in homozygote SPCA1 knock-out mice in which embryos died in uteri however with no apparent cardiac pathology [20]. However, it is likely that SPCA1 plays an important role in the heart because of its’ role in intracellular calcium homeostasis and that SPCA1 activity was reported high in the heart [21]. Future studies should examine cardiac function in aged SPCA1 heterozygote knock-out or perhaps better knock-in animals HHD like mutations. Regarding general aging, there is no direct evidence that SPCA1 plays a role, however it was shown that in ultraviolet light exposed keratinocytes, low levels of SPCA1 increases cytosolic calcium as well as reactive oxygen levels, which may contribute to cellular aging [22].

Strengths and limitations

The main strength of this study is that we used a large comprehensive patient registry with physician assigned diagnoses that enabled us to link a rare diagnosis, HHD, to common heart disease diagnoses. A limitation of the register-based study is that the specific diagnosis codes have not been formally validated, however, a validation study has shown that diagnoses of chronic disorders are generally valid [7]. Also, a specialist dermatologist almost exclusively assigns diagnoses of HHD after a thorough work-up, including the clinical presentation, family history, histopathological findings, and genetic testing. Another possible limitation is the potential influence of unknown confounding factors not accounted for in the population-based data. Further, our clinical cohort of HHD patients is the world’s largest to our best knowledge, yet the cohort’s limited size and thus power might have led to statistical type I error.

Conclusions

In the population-based cohort study, we found an excess risk of arrhythmia diagnosis among HHD patients. These findings expand our understanding of HHD, as it potentially may be a systemic condition not just confined to the skin. Our study also sheds light on the importance of the Golgi apparatus in cardiac physiology. HHD patients may need to be screened for heart disease in clinical practice; however, larger cohort clinical studies are needed to achieve sufficient power.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and arrhythmia in individuals with HHD.

A total of 342 individuals with an ICD-10 diagnosis of HHD (Q82.8E) were identified and matched with comparison individuals without HHD on a 1:100 ratio, randomly selected from the general Swedish population (all individuals with HHD diagnosis since the start of the register included). Successful matching was performed for birth year, sex, and county of residence at the time of the first HHD diagnosis of the individual. This matching scheme is referred to as incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed for the associations between HHD and the major ICD groups of heart diseases: myocardial infarction [I21], heart failure [I42, I50], and arrhythmias. SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses. The results were expressed as odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. As a result of the incidence density sampling, odds ratios can be interpreted as risk ratios (RR). The table also shows the mean age and standard deviation (SD) at first arrhythmia diagnosis among individuals with HHD and comparison individuals. *Diagnoses included in arrhythmias: paroxysmal tachycardia [I47], atrial fibrillation and flutter [I48], and other cardiac arrhythmias [I49]. Within the group called other cardiac arrhythmias, there are ten arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation [I49.01], ventricular flutter [I49.02], atrial premature depolarization [I49.1], junctional premature polarization [I49.2], ventricular premature polarization [I49.3], unspecified premature polarization [I49.40], other premature polarization [I49.49], sick sinus syndrome [I49.5], other specified cardiac arrhythmias [I49.8] and cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified [I49.9].

(DOCX)

pone.0309482.s001.docx (14.1KB, docx)
S2 Table. ECG parameters, blood biomarkers, and electrolytes from 23 HHD patients and matched healthy control subjects.

Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of HHD set by a dermatologist based on typical clinical appearance, histopathology, and family history. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, current pregnancy, active substance abuse, and acute illness in the past 4 weeks. The control group was matched for age, sex, and BMI. *After multiple comparisons with Bonferroni post hoc correction, none of the p-values are significant (p<0.005). ** M = males, F = females.

(DOCX)

pone.0309482.s002.docx (16KB, docx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from Hudfonden, Swedish Science Council, Swedish Society for Medical Research, Leo foundation, ALF medicin Stockholm, Jeanssons stiftelse, Wallenberg foundation and Tore Nilssons Stiftelse. All grants were to Jakob D Wikstrom. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bachar-Wikstrom E, Curman P, Ahanian T, Leong IUS, Larsson H, Cederlof M, et al. Darier disease is associated with heart failure: a cross-sectional case-control and population based study. Sci Rep. 2020;10; 6886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63832-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Curman P, Bern J, Sand L, Cederlof M, Bachar-Wikstrom E, Wikstrom JD. Patients with Darier Disease Exhibit Cognitive Impairment while Patients with Hailey-Hailey Disease Do Not: An Experimental, Matched Case-control Study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021;101; adv00476. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cederlof M, Curman P, Ahanian T, Leong IUS, Brismar K, Bachar-Wikstrom E, et al. Darier disease is associated with type 1 diabetes: Findings from a population-based cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81; 1425–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ahanian T, Curman P, Leong IUS, Brismar K, Bachar-Wikstrom E, Cederlof M, et al. Metabolic phenotype in Darier disease: a cross-sectional clinical study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12; 12. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-0520-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li J, Ahat E, Wang Y. Golgi Structure and Function in Health, Stress, and Diseases. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2019;67; 441–485. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23173-6_19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ludvigsson JF, Almqvist C, Bonamy AK, Ljung R, Michaelsson K, Neovius M, et al. Registers of the Swedish total population and their use in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31; 125–136. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0117-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11; 450. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Organization WH. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Molho-Pessach V, Lerer I, Abeliovich D, Agha Z, Abu Libdeh A, Broshtilova V, et al. The H syndrome is caused by mutations in the nucleoside transporter hENT3. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83; 529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Henske EP, Jozwiak S, Kingswood JC, Sampson JR, Thiele EA. Tuberous sclerosis complex. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2; 16035. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cederlof M, Bergen SE, Langstrom N, Larsson H, Boman M, Craddock N, et al. The association between Darier disease, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia revisited: a population-based family study. Bipolar Disord. 2015;17; 340–344. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Falsaperla R, Giacchi V, Aguglia MG, Mailo J, Longo MG, Natacci F, et al. Monogenic Syndromes with Congenital Heart Diseases in Newborns (Diagnostic Clues for Neonatologists): A Critical Analysis with Systematic Literature Review. J Pediatr Genet. 2021;10; 173–193. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vahidnezhad H, Youssefian L, Faghankhani M, Mozafari N, Saeidian AH, Niaziorimi F, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in patients with biallelic JUP-associated skin fragility. Sci Rep. 2020;10; 21622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78344-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burge SM, Garrod DR. An immunohistological study of desmosomes in Darier’s disease and Hailey-Hailey disease. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124; 242–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb00568.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gerull B. Skin-heart connection: what can the epidermis tell us about the myocardium in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy? Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2014;7; 225–227. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Amagai M, Kobayashi M, Wakabayashi K, Hakuno M, Hashiguchi A, Nishikawa T, et al. A case of generalized Hailey-Hailey disease with fatal liver injury. Keio J Med. 2001;50; 109–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bhat OM, Li PL. Lysosome Function in Cardiovascular Diseases. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2021;55; 277–300. doi: 10.33594/000000373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ponce-Balbuena D, Guerrero-Serna G, Valdivia CR, Caballero R, Diez-Guerra FJ, Jimenez-Vazquez EN, et al. Cardiac Kir2.1 and NaV1.5 Channels Traffic Together to the Sarcolemma to Control Excitability. Circ Res. 2018;122; 1501–1516. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jungk L, Franke H, Salameh A, Dhein S. Golgi Fragmentation in Human Patients with Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: A New Aspect of Remodeling. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67; 98–106. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1635079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okunade GW, Miller ML, Azhar M, Andringa A, Sanford LP, Doetschman T, et al. Loss of the Atp2c1 secretory pathway Ca(2+)-ATPase (SPCA1) in mice causes Golgi stress, apoptosis, and midgestational death in homozygous embryos and squamous cell tumors in adult heterozygotes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282; 26517–26527. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703029200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wootton LL, Argent CC, Wheatley M, Michelangeli F. The expression, activity and localisation of the secretory pathway Ca2+ -ATPase (SPCA1) in different mammalian tissues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1664; 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xie H, Xiao X, Yi Y, Deng M, Li P, Jian D, et al. A Negative Feedback Loop in Ultraviolet A-Induced Senescence in Human Dermal Fibroblasts Formed by SPCA1 and MAPK. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8; 597993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Albert Rübben

7 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-25220Increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia in Hailey-Hailey disease patientsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wikstrom,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. The review process has revealed need for clarification and I would ask you to respond to the comments in detail, especially as one reviewer has raised significant reservation regarding the methodology.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 23 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Albert Rübben, Ass. Prof., M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Note from Emily Chenette, Editor in Chief of PLOS ONE, and Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Director of Open Research Solutions at PLOS: Did you know that depositing data in a repository is associated with up to a 25% citation advantage (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416)? If you’ve not already done so, consider depositing your raw data in a repository to ensure your work is read, appreciated and cited by the largest possible audience. You’ll also earn an Accessible Data icon on your published paper if you deposit your data in any participating repository (https://plos.org/open-science/open-data/#accessible-data).

3. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

4. In the online submission form, you indicated that the datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval. 

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Major issues

1. This reviewer does not think that the data presented in this manuscript explain and justify the conclusions made by the authors, i.e. patients with HHD would be at a significantly higher risk for cardiac arrhythmias. Although it is an interesting assumption, however, a more careful selection of patients as well as mechanistic studies should be performed to establish such a link. It is not mentioned what medications were taken by patients in any of the groups, a number of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs can cause arrhythmias. It is not mentioned what other pathologies were present in any of the two groups, that could be associated with arhythmias. It is not mentioned how many male/female patients were included in the different groups.

2. A large number of different types of cardiac arrhythmias were reported in the population-based cohort in the HHD group, including supraventricular arrhythmias, even atrial fibrillation, then junctional arrhythmias and ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation. In HHD patients, how many had heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, any condition that could lead to arrhythmia development (hyperthyreosis etc)?

3. The conclusions are also not supported by the "separate clinical cohort" (?), with absolutely no differences in ECG parameters, no arrhythmia development etc.

Minor issues

1. It is recommended to state the method how the frequency-corrected QT interval was calculated. The literature suggests that the Basett's and Fridericia corrections tend to over- or undercorrect at heart rates markedly deviating from textbook average basal heart rates. Use of the Hodges, Framingham etc corrections are recommended.

2. I do not think that 2.39 vs 2.34 (probably mmol/L, not shown in manuscript) in calcium plasma levels is a meaningful clinical difference that would explain any conclusions, even if this is a mathematically significant difference.

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript, the authors present the results of the study, in which they investigate the relationship between Hailey-Hailey disease and associated cardiac arrythmia in a Swedish population-based cohort.

Results are clinically relevant and reviles new knowledge on the cardiac manifestations in Hailey-Hailey disease.

The manuscript is well prepared.

Comment:

Blood biomarkers are mentioned in line 114. I would suggest that the authors explain which biomarkers were investigated.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309482.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Jul 2024

Reviewer #1: Major issues

1. This reviewer does not think that the data presented in this manuscript explain and justify the conclusions made by the authors, i.e. patients with HHD would be at a significantly higher risk for cardiac arrhythmias. Although it is an interesting assumption, however, a more careful selection of patients as well as mechanistic studies should be performed to establish such a link. It is not mentioned what medications were taken by patients in any of the groups, a number of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs can cause arrhythmias. It is not mentioned what other pathologies were present in any of the two groups, that could be associated with arhythmias. It is not mentioned how many male/female patients were included in the different groups.

Answer: First, we would like thank the reviewer for investing the time to review our manuscript. We agree that more studies to ascertain the link to arrythmias are needed and therefore we have softened this conclusion (line 205, pages 8). As this is a clinical and population-based registry study we cannot perform mechanistic experiments to study the underlying molecular pathology. Also, given the nature of the register-based data it is unfortunately unfeasible to correct for the vast number of possible drugs that can give rise to cardiac arrhythmias, even though we agree that this would be interesting to do.

The male/female ratio is now included (lines 106 and 107, page 5). None of the patients in the clinical study suffered from cardiac diseases or arrhythmia nor did they take medications or underlying comorbidities that could trigger cardiac disturbances (page 5, line 123-126).

2. A large number of different types of cardiac arrhythmias were reported in the population-based cohort in the HHD group, including supraventricular arrhythmias, even atrial fibrillation, then junctional arrhythmias and ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation. In HHD patients, how many had heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, any condition that could lead to arrhythmia development (hyperthyreosis etc)?

Answer: Thank you for pointing to possible confounding factors that might contribute to the findings in the population-based cohort. Given the nature of the population-based data we are unable to correct for these underlying conditions at this time. We can, however, reason that the same factors that give rise to cardiac arrhythmias also could give rise to heart failure and other cardiac-related disorders, why the association observed still holds true. We have added a sentence on this in the limitations section on line 201-202.

3. The conclusions are also not supported by the "separate clinical cohort" (?), with absolutely no differences in ECG parameters, no arrhythmia development etc.

Answer: HHD is a very rare disease with an incidence of 1:50,000. The cohort of 23 patients examined belong to the largest cohorts studied worldwide and is really the best we could achieve in a single center study. We have added a statement that studies on larger cohorts are needed to achieve sufficient power (line 205, page 8).

Minor issues

1. It is recommended to state the method how the frequency-corrected QT interval was calculated. The literature suggests that the Basett's and Fridericia corrections tend to over- or undercorrect at heart rates markedly deviating from textbook average basal heart rates. Use of the Hodges, Framingham etc corrections are recommended.

Answer: Thank you for this useful comment. We have included calculations using the Bazzet formula, Fridericia formula, Framingham formula, and Hodges formula in Table 2.

2. I do not think that 2.39 vs 2.34 (probably mmol/L, not shown in manuscript) in calcium plasma levels is a meaningful clinical difference that would explain any conclusions, even if this is a mathematically significant difference.

Answer: In the result section we state that “Total Ca2+ was slightly higher in the HHD group, although within the normal physiological range and after multiple comparison correction this finding was insignificant.”

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript, the authors present the results of the study, in which they investigate the relationship between Hailey-Hailey disease and associated cardiac arrythmia in a Swedish population-based cohort.

Results are clinically relevant and reviles new knowledge on the cardiac manifestations in Hailey-Hailey disease.

The manuscript is well prepared.

Answer: We thank the reviewer for the positive outlook on the manuscript.

Comment:

Blood biomarkers are mentioned in line 114. I would suggest that the authors explain which biomarkers were investigated.

Answer: The blood biomarkers are shown in Table 2.

Decision Letter 1

Albert Rübben

13 Aug 2024

Increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia in Hailey-Hailey disease patients

PONE-D-23-25220R1

Dear Dr. Wikstrom,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Please integrate the comment of reviewer #2 in the final version of the manuscript.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Albert Rübben, Ass. Prof., M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The author have responded to the reviewer's comments and there remains only an additional minor change requested by the reviewer which should be corrected in the proofs.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Comment:

Blood biomarkers are mentioned in line 117. I would suggest to mention which biomarkers were investigated also in text (Material and Methods) not only in table 2.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Albert Rübben

27 Aug 2024

PONE-D-23-25220R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wikstrom,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Albert Rübben

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and arrhythmia in individuals with HHD.

    A total of 342 individuals with an ICD-10 diagnosis of HHD (Q82.8E) were identified and matched with comparison individuals without HHD on a 1:100 ratio, randomly selected from the general Swedish population (all individuals with HHD diagnosis since the start of the register included). Successful matching was performed for birth year, sex, and county of residence at the time of the first HHD diagnosis of the individual. This matching scheme is referred to as incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed for the associations between HHD and the major ICD groups of heart diseases: myocardial infarction [I21], heart failure [I42, I50], and arrhythmias. SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses. The results were expressed as odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. As a result of the incidence density sampling, odds ratios can be interpreted as risk ratios (RR). The table also shows the mean age and standard deviation (SD) at first arrhythmia diagnosis among individuals with HHD and comparison individuals. *Diagnoses included in arrhythmias: paroxysmal tachycardia [I47], atrial fibrillation and flutter [I48], and other cardiac arrhythmias [I49]. Within the group called other cardiac arrhythmias, there are ten arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation [I49.01], ventricular flutter [I49.02], atrial premature depolarization [I49.1], junctional premature polarization [I49.2], ventricular premature polarization [I49.3], unspecified premature polarization [I49.40], other premature polarization [I49.49], sick sinus syndrome [I49.5], other specified cardiac arrhythmias [I49.8] and cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified [I49.9].

    (DOCX)

    pone.0309482.s001.docx (14.1KB, docx)
    S2 Table. ECG parameters, blood biomarkers, and electrolytes from 23 HHD patients and matched healthy control subjects.

    Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of HHD set by a dermatologist based on typical clinical appearance, histopathology, and family history. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, current pregnancy, active substance abuse, and acute illness in the past 4 weeks. The control group was matched for age, sex, and BMI. *After multiple comparisons with Bonferroni post hoc correction, none of the p-values are significant (p<0.005). ** M = males, F = females.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0309482.s002.docx (16KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES