Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2020 Feb 20;58(4):526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.017

Emergency Department Visits Attributed to Adverse Events Involving Benzodiazepines, 2016–2017

Ruth N Moro 1,2, Andrew I Geller 1, Nina J Weidle 1,3, Jennifer N Lind 1, Maribeth C Lovegrove 1, Kathleen O Rose 1,2, Sandra K Goring 1,2, Jana K McAninch 4, Deborah Dowell 5, Daniel S Budnitz 1
PMCID: PMC11380802  NIHMSID: NIHMS2011989  PMID: 32089287

Abstract

Introduction:

Characterization of emergency department visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines can be used to guide preventive interventions. This study describes U.S. emergency department visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines by intent, patient characteristics, and clinical manifestations.

Methods:

Data from the 2016–2017 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project were analyzed in 2019 to calculate estimated annual numbers and rates of emergency department visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines, by intent of benzodiazepine use.

Results:

Based on 6,148 cases, there were an estimated 212,770 (95% CI=167,163, 258,377) emergency department visits annually attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines. More than half were visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines (119,008; 55.9%, 95% CI=50.0%, 61.9%), one third were visits involving self-harm with benzodiazepines (64,721; 30.4%, 95% CI=25.6%, 35.2%), and a smaller proportion of visits involved therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (29,041; 13.6%, 95% CI=11.4%, 15.9%). The estimated population rate of visits was highest for non-medical use of benzodiazepines by patients aged 15–34 years (7.4 visits per 10,000 people). Among visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines, 54.8% (95% CI=49.8%, 59.8%) were made by patients aged 15–34 years, 82.7% (95% CI=80.1%, 85.4%) involved concurrent use of other substances (illicit drugs, alcohol, prescription opioids, and/or other pharmaceuticals), and 24.2% (95% CI=17.7%, 30.6%) involved cardiorespiratory arrest or unresponsiveness.

Conclusions:

These findings support recommendations to assess for and address substance use disorder before initiating or continuing benzodiazepines and reinforce the need for validated self-harm risk assessment tools for clinicians.

INTRODUCTION

Benzodiazepines have a wide range of indications for use including treatment of anxiety, insomnia, seizures, and acute alcohol withdrawal and for peri-procedural sedation. The risk of severe adverse events at therapeutic doses is generally considered low. However, product labeling, including a boxed warning,1 cautions that co-administration with another central nervous system depressant, such as opioids or alcohol, can cause severe respiratory depression.2,3 Prolonged use of benzodiazepines increases risk of physical dependence,4 and use by older adults has been associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment, falls, and fractures.5

Benzodiazepines have also been identified as one of the classes of medications most frequently involved in harms from nonmedical use of substances in the U.S. Use of benzodiazepines increased from 2.0% in 1999–2000 to 4.2% in 2013–2014,6 with 13.5 million adults filling a prescription for benzodiazepines in 2013.7 From 2004 to 2011, benzodiazepines were involved in nearly as many emergency department (ED) visits for misuse and abuse of medications as opioid pain relievers,810 and by 2016, benzodiazepines were implicated in more ED visits for nonmedical use (47%) than prescription opioids (36%).11

To help target interventions to reduce harm involving benzodiazepines, this study uses nationally representative public health surveillance data to estimate numbers of ED visits attributed to adverse events by patient characteristics and intent of use and to identify concurrently involved substances and clinical manifestations.

METHODS

Study Sample

The authors used data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance (NEISS–CADES) project, a joint collaboration of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This active public health surveillance system is based on a nationally representative probability sample of 60 hospitals in the U.S. and its territories with at least 6 beds and a 24-hour ED.12 Data collection for the NEISS–CADES project is considered a public health surveillance activity by federal human subjects oversight bodies and does not require human subject review or IRB.13

As described previously,14,15 abstractors review medical records to identify ED visits attributed to adverse events involving medications used for any reason. Adverse events include adverse reactions to therapeutic doses, administration errors by adults, unsupervised ingestions by children, overdoses of any kind, and secondary injuries (e.g., choking on a pill) attributed to medication. Up to 4 implicated medications, free-text narratives of the event (including clinical manifestations, relevant preceding events, illicit drug use, or alcohol consumption), clinician diagnoses, laboratory testing, treatment administered, and discharge disposition are recorded. Clinical manifestations and medications are coded based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 9.1, and a modified version of the Veterans Administration National Drug File, respectively.

Measures

Cases in which a benzodiazepine was implicated from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017 were selected. If benzodiazepine use was based only on positive toxicology testing without supporting clinical documentation, the case was excluded. Clinicians’ assessment of patients’ intent of benzodiazepine use was classified as therapeutic (used as directed or unintentional errors or ingestions), self-harm (used intentionally to injure oneself), or nonmedical use. Nonmedical use included the following: (1) current abuse (clinician diagnosis of abuse or documentation of recreational use; e.g., to get high), (2) therapeutic misuse (documented therapeutic intent, but not used as directed; e.g., taking someone else’s benzodiazepine to self-treat anxiety), or (3) overdoses without documentation of therapeutic intent, self-harm, abuse, or misuse (e.g., patients who have documented overdoses but are unable or unwilling to describe the event). Although concern has been raised that the term abuse may contribute to stigma,16,17 it is employed here because the term remains commonly used by clinicians in medical documentation.

Statistical Analysis

Cases were weighted based on the inverse probability of selection, adjusted for nonresponse and hospital nonparticipation, and post-stratified to adjust for changes in the total number of hospital ED visits each year. National estimates of ED visits with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using the SURVEY-MEANS procedure in SAS, version 9.4 to account for the sample weights and complex sample design. NEISS–CADES estimates for the 2-year period (2016–2017) were divided by 2 to obtain the average annual estimates. Estimates based on small numbers of cases (<20) or total estimates <1,200 are considered statistically unstable and are not shown. Estimates with coefficients of variation >30% are considered statistically unstable and are noted. To estimate rates of ED visits by age, the authors used intercensal estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.18 Data were analyzed in 2019.

RESULTS

Based on 6,148 NEISS–CADES surveillance cases, there were an estimated 212,770 (95% CI=167,163, 258,377) ED visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines in the U.S. per year in 2016–2017, accounting for 9.9% (95% CI=8.2%, 11.5%) of the total number of estimated ED visits attributed to medication adverse events. More than half were visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines (119,008, 95% CI=87,010, 151,005; 55.9%, 95% CI=50.0%, 61.9%), nearly equally divided between visits with documented abuse (26.1%) and overdoses without documentation of therapeutic intent, self-harm, abuse, or misuse (25.1%) (Table 1) (Appendix Table 1, available online). One third were visits for self-harm using benzodiazepines (30.4%, 95% CI=25.6%, 35.2%; 64,721, 95% CI=49,939, 79,503), and a smaller proportion of visits was due to adverse events involving therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (29,041, 95% CI=22,403, 35,679; 13.6%; 95% CI=11.4%, 15.9%).

Table 1.

Emergency Department Visits Attributed to Adverse Events Involving Benzodiazepines, by Patient Characteristics, 2016–2017

Patient characteristics Nonmedical use of benzodiazepinesa
Self-harm using benzodiazepines
Therapeutic use of benzodiazepinesb
Cases
n
Annual estimate
Cases
n
Annual estimate
Cases
n
Annual estimate
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)

Patient age, yearsc
 <5 0 0 106 2,617d 9.0 (6.9, 11.1)
 5–14 50 1,215e 1.0e (0.3, 1.7) 36 697e 1.1e (0.4, 1.8) 30
 15–24 902 30,929 26.0 (20.6, 31.4) 377 13,675 21.1 (17.9, 24.4) 61 1,761 6.1 (3.9, 8.2)
 25–34 1,004 34,239 28.8 (24.8, 32.8) 339 12,481 19.3 (16.7, 21.9) 102 4,001 13.8 (10.7, 16.8)
 35–44 562 18,076 15.2 (12.8, 17.5) 335 13,231 20.4 (17.8, 23.1) 84 2,893 10.0 (6.6, 13.3)
 45–54 512 17,278 14.5 (12.5, 16.5) 320 11,938 18.4 (16.9, 20.0) 133 4,569 15.7 (12.7, 18.8)
 55–64 381 12,740 10.7 (8.7, 12.7) 223 8,258 12.8 (10.4, 15.1) 138 5,173 17.8 (14.1, 21.5)
 65–74 104 3,640 3.1 (2.0, 4.1) 76 3,016 4.7 (2.4, 6.9) 112 3,653 12.6 (9.0, 16.2)
 ≥75 22 838e 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) 33 1,426e 2.2 (0.9, 3.5) 104 4,059 14.0 (9.9, 18.1)
Patient sex
 Female 1,459 50,877 42.8 (40.4, 45.1) 1,131 42,598 65.8 (62.7, 69.0) 499 16,272 56.0 (50.8, 61.3)
 Male 2,080 68,131 57.2 (54.9, 59.6) 608 22,123 34.2 (31.0, 37.3) 371 12,769 44.0 (38.7, 49.2)
Dispositionf
 Hospitalized 1,310 45,521 38.3 (27.1, 49.4) 1,468 52,929 81.8 (76.4, 87.1) 299 9,577 33.0 (26.7, 39.3)
 Not hospitalized 2,229 73,487 61.7 (50.6, 72.9) 271 11,792 18.2 (12.9, 23.6) 571 19,464 67.0 (60.7, 73.3)
Total 3,539 119,008 100.0 (N/A) 1,739 64,721 100.0 (N/A) 870 29,041 100.0 (N/A)

Note: Data are from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates based on <20 cases or total estimates of <1,200 are considered statistically unstable and are not shown (—).

a

Includes abuse, therapeutic misuse, and overdoses without documentation of therapeutic intent, self-harm, abuse, or misuse.

b

includes therapeutic adverse drug events (e.g., adverse effects, allergic reactions, medication errors, and unsupervised ingestions by children).

c

Age missingfor 2 cases of nonmedical use.

d

Includes 2,477 estimated emergency department visits for unsupervised ingestions.

e

Coefficient of variation >30%.

f

Hospitalized includes inpatient admissions, observation admissions, and transfers to other hospitals. Not hospitalized includes patients treated and released and those who left against medical advice.

N/A, not applicable.

Most visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines involved male patients (57.2%), whereas most visits involving self-harm (65.8%) and therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (56.0%) involved female patients. More than four fifths (81.8%) of estimated self-harm ED visits involving benzodiazepines resulted in hospitalization. The estimated annual number of hospitalizations involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines (45,521, 95% CI=30,065, 60,978) was almost 5 times higher than the estimated number of hospitalizations for therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (9,577, 95% CI=6,297, 12,857), although hospitalization proportions were similar (38.3% vs 33.0%).

More than half of the visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines were made by young patients aged 15–34 years (54.8%, 95% CI=49.8%, 59.8%). In this age group, the annual estimated number of visits involving nonmedical use (65,167, 95% CI=45,039, 85,296) was almost 11-fold higher than the estimated number of visits involving therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (5,762, 95% CI=4,243, 7,280). Among patients aged ≥65 years, half of the estimated visits involved therapeutic use (7,711, 95% CI=4,889, 10,535; 46.4%, 95% CI=40.4%, 52.3%). Among children aged <5 years, almost all ED visits involved unsupervised ingestions of benzodiazepines (2,477, 95% CI=1,741, 3,214; 94.7%, 95% CI=90.1%, 99.2%).

Population rates of estimated ED visits attributed to benzodiazepine adverse events varied by patient age and intent of benzodiazepine use (Figure 1). Visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines by teenagers and young adults (aged 15–34 years) had the highest overall estimated population rate of ED visits per 10,000 people (7.4, 95% CI=5.1, 9.7). By contrast, among this age group, harms involving therapeutic benzodiazepine use led to only 0.6 (95% CI=0.5, 0.8) estimated visits per 10,000 people. The estimated population rates of visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines declined after young adulthood, and rates of visits involving self-harm declined after middle age, whereas rates of visits involving therapeutic use increased with age to 1.9 visits per 10,000 people among those aged ≥75 years (95% CI=1.2, 4.1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Estimated U.S. population rates of emergency department visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines, by age, 2016–2017. Estimates are from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There were <20 cases or a national estimate of <1,200 emergency department visits (considered statistically unstable) for nonmedical use and self-harm by children aged <5 years and therapeutic use by children aged 5–14 years. The coefficient of variation was >30% for nonmedical use and self-harm visits involving children aged 5–14 years and for visits involving nonmedical use and self-harm for adults aged ≥75 years.

More than 80% of annual ED visits involving nonmedical use and self-harm with benzodiazepines also involved concurrent use of illicit drugs, alcohol, prescription opioids, or other pharmaceuticals (81.6%, 95% CI=79.3%, 84.0%; 149,992, 95% CI=114,680, 185,304). Among ED visits involving nonmedical use, a single additional class of substances was documented to be involved along with benzodiazepines in almost half of the visits (47.7%), and multiple additional classes of substances were documented to be involved in one third of the visits (35.0%) (Table 2). Similarly, among ED visits involving self-harm, 46.3% involved a single class of additional substances, and 33.3% involved multiple other classes of substances along with benzodiazepines. ED visits attributed to adverse events involving therapeutic use of benzodiazepines were more than twice as likely to be attributed to benzodiazepines alone (42.8%) than ED visits for non-medical use (17.2%) or ED visits for self-harm involving benzodiazepines (20.4%).

Table 2.

Emergency Department Visits Attributed to Adverse Events Involving Benzodiazepines, by Concurrent Substance, 2016–2017

Concurrent substance Nonmedical use of benzodiazepines, annual estimate
Self-harm using benzodiazepines, annual estimate
Therapeutic use of benzodiazepines,a annual estimate
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)

Benzodiazepines onlyb 20,523 17.2 (14.6, 19.9) 13,214 20.4 (17.6, 23.2) 12,441 42.8 (37.1, 48.6)
Benzodiazepines and 1 other class of substance 56,839 47.7 (45.3, 50.3) 29,955 46.3 (43.6, 49.0) 13,288 45.8 (40.4, 51.1)
 Illicit drugs onlyc 24,078 20.2 (17.3, 23.1) 4,689 7.2 (5.7, 8.8)
 Alcohol only 14,096 11.8 (9.2, 14.4) 8,384 13.0 (10.6, 15.4) 1,004 3.5 (2.2, 4.7)
 Prescription opioids only 12,217 10.3 (7.6, 13.0) 3,274 5.1 (4.0, 6.2) 3,902 13.4 (10.1, 16.8)
 Nonopioid medications only 6,448 5.4 (4.1, 6.7) 13,608 21.0 (18.5, 23.5) 8,267 28.5 (23.5, 33.5)
Benzodiazepines and multiple classes of substances 41,646 35.0 (31.2, 38.8) 21,552 33.3 (29.9, 36.7) 3,312 11.4 (8.3, 14.5)
 Nonopioid medication(s) and (illicit drugs or alcohol) 17,295 14.5 (12.3, 16.8) 13,051 20.2 (17.6, 22.7) 838 2.9 (1.5, 4.3)
 Prescription opioid(s) and (illicit drugs or alcohol) 9,358 7.9 (5.6, 10.1) 1,658 2.6 (1.5, 3.6)
 Prescription opioid(s) and nonopioid medication(s) and/or (illicit drugs or alcohol) 8,027 6.7 (5.3, 8.2) 4,850 7.4 (6.1, 8.9) 2,291 7.9 (4.9, 10.9)
 Illicit drugs and alcohol 6,966 5.9 (4.6, 7.2) 1,995 3.1 (1.5, 4.6)
Total 119,008 100.0 (N/A) 64,721 100.0 (N/A) 29,041 100.0 (N/A)

Note: Data are from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates based on <20 cases or total estimates of <1,200 are considered statistically unstable and are not shown (—).

a

Includes 2,477 estimated emergency department visits for unsupervised ingestions by children aged <5 years.

b

Without documentation of involvement of other substances. Two different benzodiazepines were involved in 8 cases involving therapeutic use, 16 cases involving self-harm, and 24 cases involving nonmedical use.

c

includes unspecified opioids and unspecified amphetamines. Does not include prescription opioids, nonopioid medications, or alcohol.

N/A, not applicable.

Other medications were more frequently co-implicated with benzodiazepines in ED visits involving therapeutic use (53.2%) and self-harm (49.7%) compared with ED visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines (33.8%) (Table 3). Prescription opioids were the most commonly co-implicated medication class with benzodiazepines in ED visits involving nonmedical use (24.9%) and therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (21.9%). Antidepressants (15.6%) and prescription opioids (15.1%) were more frequently co-implicated with benzodiazepines than other medications in ED visits involving self-harm. Nearly half (47.8%) of visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines occurred in the presence of illicit drugs, mostly commonly marijuana (22.1%), cocaine (13.2%), and heroin (13.0%). Illicit drugs were documented in a quarter (26.1%) of ED visits for self-harm involving benzodiazepines and were rarely documented in ED visits involving therapeutic use of benzodiazepines (2.8%).

Table 3.

Concurrent Substances Commonly Involved in Emergency Department Visits Attributed to Adverse Events Involving Benzodiazepines, 2016–2017

Concurrent substance Nonmedical use of benzodiazepines, annual estimate
Self-harm using benzodiazepines, annual estimate
Therapeutic use of benzodiazepines, annual estimate
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)

Benzodiazepines and other medicationsa 40,191 33.8 (28.8, 38.7) 32,171 49.7 (46.7, 52.7) 15,458 53.2 (47.9, 58.5)
 Prescription opioids 29,602 24.9 (19.8, 30.0) 9,781 15.1 (12.8, 17.4) 6,353 21.9 (17.3, 26.4)
 Antidepressants 4,511 3.8 (2.4, 5.2) 10,081 15.6 (13.5, 17.6) 2,652 9.1 (7.0, 11.3)
 Sedative hypnotics (nonbenzodiazepine) 3,713 3.1 (2.4, 3.8) 4,296 6.6 (5.2, 8.1) 1,108 3.8 (2.0, 5.7)
 Antipsychotics 3,624 3.0 (2.5, 3.6) 5,404 8.3 (6.5, 10.2) 2,759 9.5 (5.9, 13.1)
 Skeletal Muscle Relaxants 3,286 2.8 (1.6, 4.0) 2,636 4.1 (2.8, 5.3) 1,475d 5.1 (2.5, 7.6)
 Anticonvulsants 3,032 2.5 (1.6, 3.5) 4,022 6.2 (4.5, 7.9) 2,058 7.1 (4.7, 9.5)
 Amphetamine related stimulants 1,840 1.5 (1.1, 2.0) 1,197 1.8 (1.1, 2.6)
 Other medications 18,342 15.4 (13.5, 17.3) 15,307 23.7 (21.6, 25.7) 4,719 16.2 (11.8, 20.7)
 Benzodiazepines in the presence of alcoholb 31,453 26.4 (23.8, 29.1) 19,542 30.2 (26.9, 33.6) 1,600 5.5 (3.9, 7.1)
 Benzodiazepines in the presence of illicit drugsc 56,843 47.8 (43.2, 52.3) 16,918 26.1(22.2, 30.1) 826 2.8 (1.3, 4.4)
 Marijuana 26,314 22.1 (19.4, 24.9) 9,607 14.8 (11.5, 18.2) 709 2.4 (0.9, 3.9)
 Cocaine 15,715 13.2 (10.0, 16.4) 4,124 6.4 (4.5, 8.3)
 Heroin 15,469 13.0 (9.7, 16.3) 1,451 2.2 (1.0, 3.4)
 Unspecified opioid 9,740 8.2 (6.3, 10.1) 2,411 3.7 (2.3, 5.1)
 Methamphetamine 5,386 4.5 (2.4, 6.7) 1,176 1.8 (0.9, 2.7)
 Unspecified amphetamine 4,434 3.7 (2.4, 5.1) 1,999 3.1 (1.9, 4.2)
 Illicit fentanyl 1,466d 1.2d (0.3, 2.2)
 Other illicit drugs 3,767 3.2 (2.6, 3.7)

Note: Estimates may add to more than 100% because multiple substances may be involved in a single emergency department visit. Data are from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates based on <20 cases or total estimates of <1,200 are considered statistically unstable and are not shown (—).

a

Alcohol and illicit drugs may also be involved.

b

Prescription medications and illicit drugs may also be involved.

c

Prescription medications and alcohol may also be involved.

d

Coefficient of variation >30%.

Clinical manifestations documented in ED visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines varied with intent and concurrent use of other substances (Appendix Table 2, available online). Cardiorespiratory arrest or unresponsiveness was documented in nearly one quarter (24.2%, 95% CI=17.7%, 30.6%) of ED visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines, one eighth (13.2%) of visits involving therapeutic use, and one tenth (9.9%) involving self-harm. Among patients with documented cardiorespiratory arrest or unresponsiveness, 73.7% involved nonmedical use of benzodiazepines, 16.5% involved self-harm, and 9.8% involved therapeutic use (Appendix Table 3, available online). Cardiorespiratory arrest or unresponsiveness was documented in 30.9% of visits involving nonmedical use of illicit drugs with benzodiazepines and 29.6% of visits involving nonmedical use of prescription opioids with benzodiazepines, compared with 13.7% of visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines alone (Appendix Table 4, available online).

Alprazolam was the most commonly implicated active ingredient in ED visits attributed to adverse events involving benzodiazepines (51.2%, 95% CI=45.6%, 56.7%), ranging from 31.2% of visits involving therapeutic use to 61.9% of visits involving nonmedical use (Appendix Table 5, available online).

DISCUSSION

From 2016 to 2017, there were an estimated 212,770 ED visits annually for adverse events involving benzodiazepines in the U.S., of which nearly 7 of 8 involved nonmedical use (56.0%) or self-harm (30.4%). Among visits for nonmedical use of benzodiazepines, about one fifth involved benzodiazepines alone, whereas the remainder involved other medications or occurred in the presence of other substances (illicit drugs or alcohol). With such high frequency of involvement of other medications and substances, the next step in reducing ED visits involving benzodiazepines may be identifying and addressing underlying substance use disorders and self-harm risk in patients before prescribing benzodiazepines.

Avoiding the prescription of benzodiazepines and opioids for the same patients, when possible, as recommended by product labeling, the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, and other guidelines,3,1922 is certainly a first step, but alone will not be sufficient to prevent most ED visits involving benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines have been found to be the most frequently implicated pharmaceutical in ED visits for nonmedical use,11 and opioids have been identified in more than 70% of deaths that involved benzodiazepines.23,24 In this study of morbidity involving non-medical use of benzodiazepines, one quarter (24.9%) of visits involved co-implication of prescription opioids and benzodiazepines, one quarter (26.4%) involved alcohol and benzodiazepines, and almost half (47.8%) involved illicit drugs and benzodiazepines. Thus, concurrent misuse of substances other than prescription opioids is contributing to more ED visits than prescription opioids in combination with benzodiazepines.

Applying additional principles from the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain may be appropriate for guiding benzodiazepine prescribing. The CDC Guideline, and now some health department guidelines for prescribing benzodiazepines,25,26 recommends prescribers review a patient’s prescriptions for controlled substances using a prescription drug monitoring program and use urine testing for prescribed medications and illicit drugs during the course of opioid treatment.3 Identifying concurrent prescriptions for controlled substances in addition to opioids when patients are receiving benzodiazepines, and, in certain circumstances, laboratory testing26 for other substances during the course of benzodiazepine treatment, may help reduce the risk of patient harm from drug overdoses involving benzodiazepines in combination with other drugs.27

Screening patients for substance use (illicit drugs, prescription drugs, and alcohol28) before prescribing benzodiazepines could also reduce harm from patients combining benzodiazepines with other substances. Polysubstance use, drug binging, heroin injection, and history of overdose are associated with nonmedical use of benzodiazepines.29 Benzodiazepines may be used to enhance the high of opioids, to come down from other drugs such as crack or cocaine, to self-manage anxiety, and to self-treat withdrawal symptoms from opioids.29 This study’s findings from data collected in 2016–2017 are remarkably consistent with Drug Abuse Warning Network data collected from 2004 to 2008, which also reported that nearly 80% of ED visits involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines involved other drugs or alcohol, and peak incidence was in adolescents and young adults.10 Thus, involvement of benzodiazepines in polysubstance overdoses is not a new problem,3032 but an ongoing one that may require additional approaches to address.

Identifying self-harm risk before prescribing benzodiazepines could be an opportunity to reduce the 30% of benzodiazepine-related ED visits involving self-harm attempts, as some experts similarly have suggested screening for self-harm risk before prescribing opioids.33 Unfortunately, the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for self-harm risk in the general population is not high enough for screening to be recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.34 The frequent involvement of benzodiazepines in ED visits for self-harm attempts is not a new finding,35 but the continued frequency of benzodiazepine involvement reinforces the need for validated tools that could be used for identifying self-harm risk among patients prescribed benzodiazepines.

Education on the consequences of nonmedical use of benzodiazepines may need to be targeted toward teens, young adults, and prescribers. In this study, young people aged 15–34 years were most impacted by adverse events involving nonmedical use of benzodiazepines (54.8% of ED visits, with an estimated rate of 7.4 ED visits per 10,000 people). The means of obtaining benzodiazepines (e.g., prescribed, from relatives or friends, or illicitly purchased) was not able to be assessed in this study, but based on a survey of young adults in New York City, benzodiazepines were described as readily available and inexpensive to obtain.29 Therefore, it is also important for healthcare prescribers to ask about and caution patients against using benzodiazepines obtained from other sources, particularly in combination with opioid analgesics or other central nervous system depressants. There is also evidence that school- and family-based programs may have positive long-term effects in preventing alcohol and drug misuse,36,37 and teaching children and adolescents coping and problem solving skills can reduce both suicide and substance use later in life.38

Both older patients and prescribers should receive education on the safe use of benzodiazepines. Annually, an estimated 16,632 ED visits were made by patients aged ≥65 years. Although the American Geriatrics Society recommends avoiding benzodiazepines in older adults due to increased sensitivity, benzodiazepines remain widely used in this age group.5 Another estimated 2,477 ED visits occurred in children aged <5 years for unsupervised ingestion of benzodiazepines. Adults who have children at home should be reminded about safe storage and consequences of unintentional ingestion.39,40

Given the nearly 120,000 annual estimated ED visits involving nonmedical use and nearly 65,000 annual estimated visits for self-harm involving benzodiazepines, the ED setting can provide an opportunity for secondary prevention, for example, linking ED patients to substance abuse treatment services before discharge.41 Though more than 80% of ED patients treated for self-harm involving benzodiazepines were hospitalized, those who are treated and released may need psychiatric and social assessment and close follow-up, as the first episode of self-harm is a strong predictor for subsequent suicide and death.35,4244 Patients whose ED visits were attributed to nonmedical use rather than self-harm may also benefit from mental health assessment and treatment,45 as illicit drug use and medication overdoses are often associated with mental illnesses.46

Limitations

When patients use more than 1 substance it can be complicated to attribute symptoms to specific substances; nonetheless, clinicians make such determinations to guide treatment. This public health surveillance system is based on the documentation of treating clinicians and likely underestimates the number of urgent, unplanned visits for adverse events involving benzodiazepine use. The NEISS–CADES surveillance system collects information about ED visits attributed only to acute adverse events; therefore, totals do not include patients visiting other healthcare settings (e.g., urgent care clinics) or choosing to not seek medical attention for less severe symptoms (e. g., dizziness or somnolence); however, there might be repeated visits made by the same patient. Totals do not include patients with harms that were not acute effects of active benzodiazepine use (e.g., withdrawal, patients seeking substance use disorder treatment, and violence-related injuries) and patients who may have died in or en route to the ED. Totals do not include an additional 1,529 cases in which benzodiazepines were identified by a positive laboratory test but were not implicated in the adverse event by the treating clinician. In addition, although the documentation of the intent of drug use by treating clinicians and subsequent classification (nonmedical use, self-harm, or therapeutic) has not been validated, classification based on clinician reporting is used widely in regulatory and research activities4749; nonetheless, misclassification may occur. Patients may misreport intentionality (e.g., patients may report taking additional benzodiazepines for intractable insomnia, whereas their actual intent may be recreational use or self-harm), clinicians may not fully document intentionality or details surrounding the event, and patients may arrive to the ED unresponsive and unable to report intent of drug use. Finally, use of all substances may not be reported, and substances may be misclassified due to cross-reactivity in laboratory testing or may not be detected by some screening panels.

CONCLUSIONS

Benzodiazepines are implicated frequently in ED visits for adverse events, particularly involving nonmedical use and self-harm, with highest rates among teens and young adults. The findings that nearly 7 of 8 estimated ED visits attributed to adverse events involved nonmedical use of benzodiazepines or self-harm and more than 80% of these visits involve concurrent use of other substances, support recommendations to assess for and address substance use disorders before initiating or continuing benzodiazepines, and reinforce the need for validated self-harm risk assessment tools for clinicians.

Supplementary Material

Moro_ED Visits dur to AEs Involving Benzodiazepines_Appendix

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Ms. Arati Baral and Mr. Alex Tocitu, from Northrop Grumman (contractor to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), for assistance with data coding and programming.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Footnotes

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental materials associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.017.

REFERENCES

  • 1.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns about serious risks and death when combining opioid pain or cough medicines with benzodiazepines; requires its strongest warning. www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-warns-about-serious-risks-and-death-when-combining-opioid-pain-or. Updated September 20, 2017. Accessed June 18, 2019.
  • 2.Brunton L, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann B. Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 13th ed. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain – United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(1):1–49. 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1er. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Woods JH, Katz JL, Winger G. Benzodiazepines: use, abuse, and consequences. Pharmacol Rev. 1992;44(2):151–347. http://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/44/2/151. Accessed January 24, 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):674–694. 10.1111/jgs.15767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaufmann CN, Spira AP, Depp CA, Mojtabai R. Long-term use of benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics from 1999 to 2014: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(2):235–238. 10.1176/appi.ps.201700095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bachhuber MA, Hennessy S, Cunningham CO, Starrels JL. Increasing benzodiazepine prescriptions and overdose mortality in the United States, 1996–2013. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(4):686–688. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: National Estimates of Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13–4760, DAWN Series D-39. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crane EH. Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-related Emergency Department Visits. CBHSQ Rep. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/DAWN127/DAWN127/sr127-DAWN-highlights.htm. Published February 22, 2013. Accessed January 24, 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cai R, Crane E, Poneleit K, Paulozzi L. Emergency department visits involving nonmedical use of selected prescriptions drugs – United States, 2004–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(23):705–709. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5923a1.htm. Accessed January 24, 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geller AI, Dowell D, Lovegrove MC, et al. U.S. emergency department visits resulting from nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals, 2016. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(5):639–647. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schroeder T, Ault K, Division of Hazard and Injury Data Systems, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The NEISS sample – design and implementation 1997 to present. www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/pdfs/blk_media_2001d011-6b6.pdf. Published 2001. Accessed December 10, 2019.
  • 13.CDC. Distinguishing public health research and public health nonresearch. www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed May 5, 2019.
  • 14.Jhung MA, Budnitz DS, Mendelsohn AB, Weidenbach KN, Nelson TD, Pollock DA. Evaluation and overview of the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System–Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance Project (NEISS–CADES). Med Care. 2007;45(10 suppl 2):S96–S102. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318041f737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lovegrove MC, Dowell D, Geller AI, et al. U.S. emergency department visits for acute harms from prescription opioid use, 2016–2017. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(5):784–791. 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saitz R Things that work, things that don’t work, and things that matter – including words. J Addict Med. 2015;9(6):429–430. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wakeman SE. Language and addiction: choosing words wisely. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):e1–e2. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.CDC. Bridged-race population estimates: 1990–2016. https://wonder.cdc.gov/bridged-race-population.html. Updated November 19, 2019. Accessed January 24, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jann M, Kennedy WK, Lopez G. Benzodiazepines: A major component in unintentional prescription drug overdoses with opioid analgesics. J Pharm Pract. 2014;27(1):5–16. 10.1177/0897190013515001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hwang CS, Kang EM, Kornegay CJ, Staffa JA, Jones CM, McAninch JK. Trends in the concomitant prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines, 2002–2014. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(2):151–160. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hirschtritt ME, Delucchi KL, Olfson M. Outpatient, combined use of opioid and benzodiazepine medications in the United States, 1993–2014. Prev Med Rep. 2018;9:49–54. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ladapo JA, Larochelle MR, Chen A, et al. Physician prescribing of opioids to patients at increased risk of overdose from benzodiazepine use in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):623–630. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jones CM, Mack KA, Paulozzi LJ. Pharmaceutical overdose deaths, United States, 2010. JAMA. 2013;309(7):657–659. 10.1001/jama.2013.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones CM, McAninch JK. Emergency department visits and overdose deaths from combined use of opioids and benzodiazepines. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(4):493–501. 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Judicious prescribing of benzodiazepines. City Health Inf. 2016;35 (2):13–20. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/chi/chi-35-2.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levine RL, Real LA, Julius R, et al. Prescribing guidelines for Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. www.overdosefreepa.pitt.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Benzo-for-anxiety-and-insomnia-FINAL-002.pdf. Updated October 18, 2016. Accessed September 5, 2019.
  • 27.McClure FL, Niles JK, Kaufman HW, Gudin J. Concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines: evaluation of prescription drug monitoring by a United States laboratory. J Addict Med. 2017;11(6):420–426. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.CDC. Planning and implementing screening and brief intervention for risky alcohol use: a step-by-step guide for primary care practices. Atlanta, GA: CDC, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/fasd/documents/AlcoholSBIImplementationGuide-P.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed June 24, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mateu-Gelabert P, Jessell L, Goodbody E, et al. High enhancer, downer, withdrawal helper: multifunctional nonmedical benzodiazepine use among young adult opioid users in New York City. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;46:17–27. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bush DM. Emergency Department Visits Involving Nonmedical Use of Anti-anxiety Medication Alprazolam. CBHSQ Report. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014. https://atforum.com/documents/TEDS028BenzoAdmissions.pdf. Published June 2, 2011. Accessed January 24, 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. The TEDS report: substance abuse treatment admissions for abuse of benzodiazepines. Rockville, MD. http://atforum.com/documents/TEDS028BenzoAdmissions.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed December 10, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jones JD, Mogali S, Comer SD. Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;125 (1–2):8–18. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oquendo MA, Volkow ND. Suicide: a silent contributor to opioid-overdose deaths. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(17):1567–1569. 10.1056/NEJMp1801417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: suicide risk in adolescents, adults and older adults: screening. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/Recommendation-StatementFinal/suicide-risk-in-adolescents-adults-and-older-adults-screening/. Published 2019. Accessed July 14, 2019.
  • 35.Canner JK, Giuliano K, Selvarajah S, Hammond ER, Schneider EB. Emergency department visits for attempted suicide and self harm in the USA: 2006–2013. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018;27(1):94–102. 10.1017/S2045796016000871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of substance abuse prevention for early childhood: a research-based guide. www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-substance-abuse-prevention-early-child-hood/table-contents. Published 2016. Accessed May 5, 2019.
  • 37.Spoth R, Trudeau L, Shin C, et al. Longitudinal effects of universal preventive intervention on prescription drug misuse: three randomized controlled trials with late adolescents and young adults. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):665–672. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stone DM, Holland KM, Bartholow B, Crosby AE, Davis S, Wilkins N. Preventing Suicide: A Technical Package of Policy, Programs, and Practices. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.CDC. PROTECT Initiative: advancing children’s medication safety. www.cdc.gov/medicationsafety/protect/protect_initiative.html. Updated October 30, 2017. Accessed May 5, 2019.
  • 40.UpAndAway.org. Put your medicines up and away and out of sight. www.upandaway.org/. Accessed November 4, 2019.
  • 41.Coffin PO, Tracy M, Bucciarelli A, Ompad D, Vlahov D, Galea S. Identifying injection drug users at risk of nonfatal overdose. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(7):616–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Finkelstein Y, Macdonald EM, Hollands S, et al. Risk of suicide following deliberate self-poisoning. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(6):570–575. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cully G, Corcoran P, Leahy D, et al. Method of self-harm and risk of self-harm repetition: findings from a national self-harm registry. J Affect Disord. 2019;246:843–850. 10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Crandall C, Fullerton-Gleason L, Aguero R, LaValley J. Subsequent suicide mortality among emergency department patients seen for suicidal behavior. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(4):435–442. 10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bohnert ASB, Ilgen MA. Understanding links among opioid use, overdose, and suicide. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):71–79. 10.1056/NEJMra1802148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bohnert ASB, Ilgen MA, Ignacio RV, McCarthy JF, Valenstein M, Blow FC. Risk of death from accidental overdose associated with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169 (1):64–70. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10101476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Drug abuse warning network, 2010. Methodology report. www.samhsa.gov/data/report/drug-abuse-warning-network-2010-methodology-report%C2%A0. Published 2014. Accessed October 30, 2019.
  • 48.CDC. Opioid overdose – commonly used terms. www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/opioids/terms.html. Updated February 12, 2019. Accessed October 30, 2019.
  • 49.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Drug abuse and dependence section of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products – content and format guidance for industry. www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/drug-abuse-and-dependence-section-labeling-human-prescription-drug-and-biological-products-content. Published 2019. Accessed November 5, 2019.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Moro_ED Visits dur to AEs Involving Benzodiazepines_Appendix

RESOURCES