Abstract
The present study examined the prevalence of intestinal parasites in kittens from five pet shops in East Japan. Fresh faecal samples were collected from 555 kittens (aged 1–3 months) on a single occasion. The samples were tested for the presence of Giardia species coproantigen using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Other intestinal parasites were identified microscopically using the formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation technique. The overall prevalence of intestinal parasites was 27.2%; two genera of protozoa (Giardia species and Cystoisospora species) and one nematode (Toxocara cati) were detected. Faecal condition was not related to intestinal parasite infections. Significant differences among the pet shops were observed in the overall prevalence of intestinal parasites and the presence of Cystoisospora species infections.
Short Communication
Intestinal parasites are common feline pathogens and often lead to obstruction of the digestive tract. 1 The zoonotic potential of some of these parasites is a serious problem.2,3 For instance, human infection with Toxocara cati and Toxocara canis can result in visceral and ocular larva migrans.4,5 Giardia species that affect cats also have zoonotic potential because cats can also harbour zoonotic genotypes (assemblages A and B).3,6 Previously, researchers have demonstrated that the prevalence of intestinal parasites in private-household cats was significantly higher in young cats aged 1–6 months old. 7 As a proportion of private cat-owners obtain their animals from pet shops, estimating the prevalence of intestinal parasites in pet shop kittens is of obvious importance for the welfare of both kittens and humans. However, there is no up-to-date published data regarding the presence of intestinal parasites in pet shop kittens in Japan. To address this, the present study determined the prevalence of intestinal parasites in more than 500 kittens at five pet shops in east Japan.
Between January 2011 and December 2012, fresh faecal samples were randomly collected on a single occasion from 555 kittens (aged 1–3 months, males n = 243; females n = 312) with or without a history of diarrhoea, at five pet shops (1–5) in east Japan (Tohoku district: three shops; Kanto district: two shops). All faecal samples were donated by the pet shop owners, who granted permission to include their kittens in the survey. The samples were collected immediately after natural defaecation and were stored at 4°C until examination (within 3 days). The presence of Giardia-specific coproantigens was determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (SNAP Giardia, IDEXX Laboratories). Other intestinal parasites were identified microscopically using the formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation technique described previously.7,8 The data were analysed according to the faecal condition (formed vs unformed) and pet shop. It was not possible to obtain data for anthelmintic treatment. Data were analysed using Fisher’s exact probability test. The significance level was P <0.05.
Of the 555 pet shop kittens, 27.2% (151 kittens) were positive for at least one genus of intestinal parasites (see Table 1). Two genera of protozoa (Giardia species: 10.1%; Cystoisospora species: 19.6%) and one nematode (T cati: 0.2%) were identified. Multiple infections were recorded in 15 kittens (2.7%). The most common multiple infections involved Giardia species and Cystoisospora species (14 kittens), while there was a single case of concomitant infection with Giardia species and T cati. There was no significant difference in faecal condition between kittens with or without intestinal parasites. Giardia species were found in samples from all the pet shops, and Cystoisospora species (both Cystoisospora felis and Cystoisospora rivolta) were also present in samples from all shops except for one (see Table 2). Significant differences in the overall prevalence and in the presence of Cystoisospora species (C felis) were observed among the pet shops. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the presence of Giardia species among the pet shops.
Table 1.
Overall (n = 555) |
Faecal condition |
P
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Formed (n = 453) | Unformed (n = 102) | |||
Giardia species | 10.1% (56) * | 10.2% (46) | 9.8% (10) | NS |
Cystoisospora species | 19.6% (109) | 19.2% (87) | 21.6% (22) | NS |
Cystoisospora felis | 16.4% (91) | 16.1% (73) | 17.6% (18) | NS |
Cystoisospora rivolta | 3.2% (18) | 3.1% (14) | 3.9% (4) | NS |
Toxocara cati | 0.2% (1) | 0.2% (1) | 0% (0) | NS |
Total infection | 27.2% (151 † ) | 26.5% (120 † ) | 30.4% (31 † ) | NS |
Number of infected kittens
This total number is smaller than sum of each parasite because of multiple infections
NS = not significant
Table 2.
Shop 1 (n = 70) | Shop 2 (n = 134) | Shop 3 (n = 24) | Shop 4 (n = 86) | Shop 5 (n = 241) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Giardia species | 11.4% (8) * | 11.9% (16) | 4.2% (1) | 11.6% (10) | 8.7% (21) |
Cystoisospora species | 11.4% † (8) | 24.6% ‡ (33) | 0% § (0) | 9.3% ¶ (8) | 24.9%∞ (60) |
Cystoisospora felis | 8.6% † (6) | 20.9% ‡ (28) | 0% § (0) | 5.8% ¶ (5) | 21.6%∞ (52) |
Cystoisospora rivolta | 2.9% (2) | 3.7% (5) | 0% (0) | 3.5% (3) | 3.3% (8) |
Toxocara cati
|
0% (0) | 0.7% (1) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Total infection |
22.9% (16) | 32.1% # (43 ** ) | 4.2% †† (1) | 19.8% (17 ** ) | 30.7% # (74 ** ) |
Number of infected kittens
This total number is smaller than sum of each parasite because of mutiple infections
P <0.01 for # vs ††, ‡ vs §, ‡ vs ¶, § vs ∞ and ¶ vs ∞. P <0.05 for † vs ‡ and † vs ∞
Only two genera of protozoa, Giardia and Cystoisospora, and one species of nematode, T cati, were detected in faecal samples in the study. A high prevalence of Giardia (10.1%) and Cystoisospora (19.6%) species infections was recorded in this study. Recently, it has been reported that the prevalences of Giardia and Cystoisospora species infections in 1–6 month-old cats presented to veterinary clinics in Japan were 3.1% (ELISA) and 4.8% (sedimentation technique) respectively. 7 In Germany, private household cats up to the age of 3 months showed a high prevalence of Giardia species (19.5%; ELISA) and Cystoisospora species (12.8%; flotation methods). 9 It is difficult to compare the levels of parasite infections between previous studies and the present study because of the different methods of faecal examination and cat populations used. In particular, although ELISA for detection of Giardia species infection is assuredly useful in veterinary practice,10,11 polymerase chain reaction is a more sensitive and convenient technique for detecting and genotyping Giardia species in cats.11 –14 Previous studies have reported that infection with Giardia species and Cystoisospora species are common in kittens of pet shops and breeding catteries owing to easy transmission of these pathogens in a limited space.12,15,16 This suggests that insufficient control and/or the underestimation of intestinal protozoan parasites are serious problems in this population. Giardia and Cystoisospora species infections were not always associated with an alteration in faecal condition,11,15 –17 as was observed in the present study. This situation may contribute to the underestimation of these parasites, as faecal examination is unlikely to be carried out if the faeces are normal. Although there is no information regarding the sanitary management and deworming histories of animals in this study, it is highly likely that the infections in pet shops and/or breeding catteries arise from environmental contamination. This is supported by the fact that these protozoa cannot be transmitted vertically, so a simple faecal–oral transmission is the only route of infection.11,17 Furthermore, pet shop kittens are unlikely to have been exposed to the paratenic host (rodent) of Cystoisospora species infection. Giardia species cysts and Cystoisospora species oocysts are markedly stable in the environment.11,17 Considering these features of Giardia and Cystoisospora species infections, re-infection via environmental contamination is of great importance in pet shop kittens. Once these protozoa find their way into pet shops, they are difficult to eliminate from this environment. The differences in overall prevalence and the presence of Cystoisospora species infection among the pet shops may also depend on the sanitary management in each facility. Therefore, giardiasis and coccidiosis should be treated aggressively in order to reduce the level of environmental contamination. In addition, it is necessary to increase the understanding of Giardia and Cystoisospora species infections amongst veterinarians and pet shop managers.
In the present study, T cati infection was detected in only one kitten. Other studies have also revealed a low level of T cati infection in pet shop kittens. 12 As T cati is one of the most important helminth infections seen in cats, pet shop managers are likely to have a good understanding of this parasite and may, therefore, ensure that kittens and their mothers are regularly treated with anthelmintics. Another reason for this low prevalence is the lack of exposure of pet shop kittens to the paratenic hosts, such as rodents, earthworms, and insects.18,19
Conclusions
This study demonstrates a high prevalence of Giardia and Cystoisospora species infections in pet shop kittens in Japan. Further investigation of these intestinal parasites, including the genotyping of Giardia species, is recommended to help minimise the zoonotic risks.
Footnotes
Funding: The authors received no specific grant form any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors for the preparation of this short communication.
The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Accepted: 28 March 2013
References
- 1. Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. Parasites of dogs and cats. In: Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. (eds). Veterinary parasitology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007, pp 356–458. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Lymbery AJ, Thompson RCA. The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses. Int J Parasitol 2000; 30: 1369–1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Robertson ID, Thompson RCA. Enteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs and cats. Microbes Infect 2002; 4: 867–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Good B, Holland CV, Taylor MR, Larragy J, Moriarty P, O’Regan M. Ocular toxocariasis in schoolchildren. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 173–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lee ACY, Schantz PM, Kazacos KR, Montgomery SP, Bowman DD. Epidemiologic and zoonotic aspects of ascarid infections in dogs and cats. Trends Parasitol 2010; 26: 155–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Thompson RCA. The zoonotic significance and molecular epidemiology of Giardia and giardiasis. Vet Parasitol 2004; 126: 15–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Itoh N, Ikegami H, Takagi M, Ito Y, Kanai K, Chikazawa S, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in private-household cats in Japan. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 14: 436–439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Young KH, Bullock SL, Melvin DM, Spruill CL. Ethyl acetate as a substitute for diethyl ether in formalin-ether sedimentation technique. J Clin Microbiol 1979; 10: 852–853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Barutzki D, Schaper R. Results of parasitological examinations of faecal samples from cats and dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitol Res 2011; 109: S45–S60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Olson ME, Leonard NJ, Strout J. Prevalence and diagnosis of Giardia infection in dogs and cats using a fecal antigen test and fecal smear. Can Vet J 2010; 51: 640–642. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tangtrongsup S, Scorza V. Update on the diagnosis and management of Giardia spp infections in dogs and cats. Top Companion Anim Med 2010; 25: 155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. McGlade TR, Robertson ID, Elliot AD, Read C, Thompson RCA. Gastrointestinal parasites of domestic cats in Perth, Western Australia. Vet Parasitol 2003; 117: 251–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. McGlade TR, Robertson ID, Elliot AD, Thompson RCA. High prevalence of Giardia detected in cats by PCR. Vet Parasitol 2003; 110: 197–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Read CM, Monis PT, Thompson RCA. Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infec Genet Evol 2004; 4: 125–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kirkpatrick CE. Giardiasis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1987; 17: 1377–1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kirkpatrick CE, Dubey JP. Enteric coccidial infections. Isospora, Sarcocystis, Cryptosporidium, Besnoitia, and Hammondia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1987; 17: 1405–1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lappin MR. Update on the diagnosis and management of Isospora spp infections in dogs and cats. Top Companion Anim Med 2010; 25: 133–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Overgaauw PAM. Aspect of Toxocara epidemiology: Toxocarosis in dogs and cats. Crit Rev Microbiol 1997; 23: 233–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Parsons JC. Ascarid infections of cats and dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1987; 17: 1307–1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]