Abstract
Objectives: To systematically investigate the expression, prognostic value, genetic alterations, immune infiltration, and molecular function of Nck-associated protein 1 (NCKAP1) in a pan-cancer analysis, with a specific focus on its association with kidney renal cell carcinoma (KIRC). Methods: We analyzed the role of NCKAP1 across various tumor types using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis version 2 (GEPIA2) database was used to assess the correlation between NCKAP1 expression levels and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) across different cancers, as well as its association with cancer stage. Genetic alterations of NCKAP1 were explored using CBioPortal, and their prognostic implications were assessed. NCKAP1 was further analyzed through Gene Ontology and protein interaction network analyses. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database evaluated NCKAP1 levels in KIRC tissues. Functional assays, including Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation, transwell, and wound healing assays, were conducted to determine the effects of NCKAP1 overexpression on cell growth rate and their ability to invade, proliferate, migrate in a KIRC (786-O) cell line. The relationship between NCKAP1 expression and immune infiltration in KIRC was systematically examined using the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource. Results: NCKAP1 expression was significantly altered in most tumor types compared to corresponding non-tumor tissues. Survival analysis indicated that low NCKAP1 expression was associated with poor OS, DFS, and advanced cancer stage (P < 0.05) specifically in KIRC. Genetic alterations in NCKAP1 were linked to clinical outcome in cancer patients, and a positive correlation was observed between NCKAP1 expression and cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration (P < 0.05). Gene Ontology analysis revealed that NCKAP1 regulates the actin cytoskeleton and interacts with proteins such as CYFIP1, ABI2, WASF2, and BRK1. IHC staining showed significantly lower NCKAP1 levels in KIRC tissues compared to normal tissues. Overexpression of NCKAP1 in KIRC cell lines reduced cell proliferation, invasion, and migration (P < 0.05). NCKAP1 was also positively correlated with macrophage, neutrophil, and CD4+ T cell infiltration (P < 0.001). Conclusion: NCKAP1 may serve as a prognostic and immunological marker and may be a therapeutic target for KIRC.
Keywords: Nck-associated protein 1, prognosis, pan-cancer, biomarker, kidney, renal clear cell carcinoma
Introduction
Cancer affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide, with clinical outcome depending on multiple factors, including the availability of reliable biomarkers [1,2]. As personalized medicine advances, biomarkers derived from DNA, RNA, and proteins are becoming increasingly important [3]. Identifying oncogenes is crucial for understanding carcinogenesis and tumor progression, thereby broadening treatment options [4]. The development of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in the last decade has significantly expanded our ability to analyze pan-cancer data [5,6].
Nck-associated protein 1 (NCKAP1) is a component of the WASF regulatory complex (WRC), which includes CYFIP1, ABI2, WASF2, and BRK1. It may function as a transducing protein in the Rac signaling pathway, a positive regulator of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin nucleation, and a mediator of a novel form of cell death called disulfideptosis [7,8]. According to Kwon et al., inhibiting NCKAP1 expression reduced cell migration and invasion in colorectal cancer, suggesting its role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its potential as a biomarker for detecting metastatic colorectal cancer and developing therapeutic strategies [9]. Additionally, NCKAP1 plays a critical role in HSP90-induced invasion and metastasis by activating MMP9 and promoting EMT in non-small-cell lung cancer cells [10]. In a mouse melanoma model, NCKAP1 depletion led to increased collagen deposition, fibrotic stroma, reduced tumor proliferation, and enhanced immune infiltration, ultimately slowing tumor growth [11]. Furthermore, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines, NCKAP1 promotes cell invasion by binding to WASF1 and modulates the cell cycle through Rb1/p53 regulation, contributing to HCC carcinogenesis [12]. Therefore, NCKAP1 may serve as an important biomarker for cancer prognosis and treatment. To our knowledge, no comprehensive analysis of NCKAP1’s function and clinical significance at the pan-cancer level has been conducted.
In this study, we systematically investigated the expression, prognostic value, genetic alterations, immune infiltration, and molecular function of NCKAP1 across various cancers, with a specific focus on its association with kidney renal cell carcinoma (KIRC).
Materials and methods
Gene expression analysis
NCKAP1 mRNA expression was analyzed using the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (version 20.1) (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). Gene expression analysis in tumor and non-tumor tissues was performed using the “Gene DE” module in Tumor Immune Estimation Resource version 2 (TIMER2, http://timer.cistrome.org/). This analysis aimed to determine whether there are differences in NCKAP1 expression between normal and tumor tissues.
Survival prognosis analysis
The survival prognosis of NCKAP1 was assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A survival significance map of NCKAP1 across all TCGA tumor types was generated using the “Survival Analysis” module in Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis version 2 (GEPIA2, http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/), using the Log-rank test (Mantel-Cox test) for hypothesis testing. The Cox proportional hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval were included in survival plots.
Genetic alteration analysis
Genetic alterations in NCKAP1 were analyzed using the cBio Cancer Genomics Portal (CBioPortal, https://www.cbioportal.org/). This tool provided information on the frequency of gene mutations and copy number alterations across various cancer types, calculated using the “Cancer Types Summary” module based on TCGA pan-cancer datasets. A mutation site plot was generated with the “Mutations” module. The relationship between NCKAP1 mutation status and prognosis in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) was examined by categorizing cases based on molecular profiles and generating a survival plot based on the presence of copy number alterations (altered and unaltered groups).
Immune cell infiltration analysis
The Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) online platform, using RNA-Seq expression profiling data, was employed to analyze immune cell infiltration in different tumor tissues and its impact on clinical outcome. We used the TIMER2.0 “Immune” module to investigate the correlation between NCKAP1 expression and cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration using the Extended Polydimensional Immunome Characterization (EPIC) and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) algorithms. Additionally, we assessed the relationship between NCKAP1 expression and immune cell infiltration, including B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells in KIRC, using partial Spearman’s correlation for this association analysis.
Gene enrichment analysis
We used the STRING tool (https://string-db.org/) to construct a co-expression network for Homo sapiens NCKAP1 and analyzed 100 gene symbols correlated with NCKAP1, extracted via the “Similar Gene Detection” module in GEPIA2. Gene Ontology pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the “clusterProfiler” R package (version 4.6.0). Additionally, pairwise gene correlation analysis was conducted using the “Correlation Analysis” module in GEPIA2, employing Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall methods to assess gene expression correlations.
Protein interaction and conservation analysis
We created an NCKAP1-protein interaction network using the BioGRID Network module (https://thebiogrid.org/), with the layout set to “Concentric Circles”. Gene communication between vertebrates was visualized using the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks).
Pathologic sample collection
Paraffin-embedded KIRC tissue samples and matched normal tissues were collected and examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with NCKAP1 antibody from the HPA database to compare NCKAP1 expression differences between normal tissue and renal clear cell carcinoma.
Cell culture and transfections
The KIRC 786-O cell line used in this study was obtained from The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, United States). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, United States) and maintained in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C. The NCKAP1 overexpression vector and control vector were provided by Hanbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Transfections into 786-O cells were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 and Opti-MEMI medium (Gibco, United States), following the manufacturer’s instructions for successful gene delivery and expression.
qRT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher, United States), and cDNA was synthesized using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, United States). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted in triplicate using SYBR Green I (Servicebio, China) to assess NCKAP1 expression levels. GAPDH served as the internal control. The primers used for qRT-PCR were as follows: NCKAP1: 5’-TCCTAAATACTGACGCTACAGCA-3’ (forward) and 5’-GCCTCCTTGCATTCTCTTATGTC-3’ (reverse); GAPDH: 5’-GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACAGCG-3’ (forward) and 5’-ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAA-3’ (reverse).
Western blot analysis
Proteins were extracted using a whole-cell lysis assay (Servicebio, China). After separation through sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes for western blotting. Membranes were blocked with skimmed milk and then incubated overnight at 4°C with a primary antibody against NCKAP1 (1:1,000; CST, United States). The following day, membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody (1:5,000; Abcam, UK) at room temperature after washing. Protein bands were detected using a chemiluminescence detection kit. GAPDH (1:1,000; CST, United States) was used as the loading control to ensure equal protein loading across samples.
Cell viability assay
Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Beyotime, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 2 × 103 cells per well and cultured for 72 hours under standard conditions. At 24, 48, and 72 hours, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37°C for 2 hours. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm to determine cell viability. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated three times to ensure accuracy.
Colony formation assay
Cells were plated at a density of 5 × 102 per well in 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C. After two weeks of culture, colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet at room temperature. Colony counting was performed by analyzing digital images of the wells from each of the three replicate plates.
Transwell assay
Cell invasion was assessed using Transwell inserts (8 μm pore size, Corning, United States) coated with Matrigel (BD, United States). A total of 5 × 104 cells were placed in the upper chamber, with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 20% FBS added to the lower chamber. After 24 hours of incubation, cells that had migrated to the lower chamber were fixed and stained. The number of invading cells was counted in five randomly chosen fields of view on the lower membrane. The experiment was conducted in triplicate to ensure reliability.
Wound healing assay
To assess cell migration capability, 5 × 105 cells were seeded into 24-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. Once the cells reached confluence, artificial wounds were created by scratching a line down the center of the cell layer. The cells were then maintained in serum-free medium. Wounded areas were photographed immediately (0 hour) and at 36 hours post-wounding using an Olympus inverted microscope. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the data were analyzed using Prism GraphPad 8.0 software. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were assessed using the t-test, with statistical significance set as P < 0.05.
Results
Gene expression analysis of NCKAP1
Analysis of datasets from the HPA, Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) and function annotation of the mammalian genome (FANTOM5) revealed that NCKAP1 was highly expressed in muscle tissues, such as heart and skeletal muscle, and was enriched in parathyroid gland (Figure 1A-C). Single-cell RNA-seq data also indicated high NCKAP1 expression in excitatory and inhibitory neurons (Figure 1D). Further, NCKAP1 mRNA expression was found to be altered in various tumor tissues compared to corresponding normal tissues. Significantly lower NCKAP1 expression was observed in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), kidney Chromophobe (KICH), KIRC, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP), prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD), skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) (all P < 0.001), uterine corpus endometrial (UCEC) (P < 0.01), bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (BLCA) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (P < 0.05) when compared to normal tissue (Figure 1E). Besides, when compared to these normal tissues, NCKAP1 expression was also significantly elevated in cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL), liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), LUAD, lung squamous cell carcinoma (all P < 0.001), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) (P < 0.01), esophageal carcinoma (ESCA) and stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) (both P < 0.05) (Figure 1E).
Figure 1.
NCKAP1 expression status in different normal tissues, cell types, and tumors. A-C. NCKAP1 expression based on datasets of the HPA, GTEx and FANTOM5 in different normal tissues. D. NCKAP1 expression in various cell types. E. NCKAP1 expression status in different tumors and normal tissues visualized by TIMER2.0. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; HPA, Human protein atlas; GTEx, Genotype-Tissue Expression; FANTOM5, Function annotation of the mammalian genome 5; TIMER2.0, Tumor Immune Estimation Resource version 2.
Association between NCKAP1 expression and cancer prognosis
To evaluate the prognostic value of NCKAP1, we used GEPIA2 to correlate NCKAP1 expression with patient prognosis across various tumors based on TCGA datasets. Lower NCKAP1 expression was associated with shorter OS in KIRC (P = 2 × 10-4), while higher NCKAP1 expression was linked to shorter OS in LIHC (P = 3.7 × 10-2) and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC) (P = 2 × 10-2) (Figure 2A-D). Additionally, DFS analysis revealed that low NCKAP1 expression was an indicator of poor outcome in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (P = 5 × 10-3) and uveal melanoma (UVM) (P = 3.2 × 10-2). Conversely, higher NCKAP1 expression was associated with better outcome in KIRC (P = 3.8 × 10-2) and brain low-grade glioma (LGG) (P = 1.8 × 10-2) (Figure 2E-I).
Figure 2.
Correlation between NCKAP1 expression and overall survival in patients with different TCGA tumor types. GEPIA2 was used to build a survival map (A) and conduct overall survival analyses (B-D). Correlation between NCKAP1 expression and disease-free survival in patients with different TCGA tumor types. GEPIA2 was used to build a survival map (E) and conduct disease-free survival (F-I) analyses. The survival map and Kaplan-Meier plots with significant results are displayed. The 95% confidence intervals of OS and DFS are indicated by red and blue dotted lines for high and low NCKAP1 groups, respectively. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; GEPIA2, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis version 2; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.
Correlation between NCKAP1 expression and pathologic stages of tumors
The relationship between NCKAP1 expression and pathologic stages of tumors was analyzed using GEPIA2. NCKAP1 expression was found to vary across tumor stages in KIRC (P = 0.00174), LIHC (P = 0.0484), LUAD (P = 0.0459), COAD (P = 0.0462) and OV (P = 0.00205). In particular, low expression of NCKAP1 was significantly correlated with advanced stages of KIRC (P = 0.00174) and OV (P = 0.00205) (Figure 3A-E).
Figure 3.
Correlation between NCKAP1 expression and pathologic stages of KIRC, LIHC, LUAD, COAD and OV from TCGA datasets (A-E). Log2 (TPM + 1) was applied for log-scale. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; KIRC, kidney renal cell carcinoma; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; OV, ovarian cancer.
Tumor-specific genetic alterations of NCKAP1
Genetic alterations in NCKAP1 were investigated across various tumor types using cBioPortal, based on TCGA datasets. A higher frequency of genetic modifications was observed in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) tumor samples, with mutations and amplifications being the primary genetic abnormalities (Figure 4A). In total, 176 mutations of NCKAP1 were identified across TCGA tumor samples, including 141 missense mutations, 20 truncating mutations, 5 fusion mutations, 9 splicing mutations, and 1 inframe mutation (Figure 4B). Additionally, NCKAP1 amplification was associated with prognosis in CSCC patients in terms of PFS (P = 2.29 × 10-2) and LUAD patients in terms of PFS (P = 2.84 × 10-2) (Figure 4C, 4D).
Figure 4.
NCKAP1 genetic alteration in various tumor types in the TCGA. The alteration frequency with NCKAP1 genetic alteration type (A) and NCKAP1 mutation site (B) were generated by cBioPortal. The correlations between NCKAP1 amplification status and disease-free survival of CSCC (C) were analyzed by cBioPortal. The correlation between mutation status and overall survival, and progression-free survival of LUAD (D) was analyzed by cBioPortal. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; KIRC, kidney renal cell carcinoma; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; OV, ovarian cancer; UCS, uterine carcinosarcoma; BRCA, breast invasive carcinoma; KICH, kidney chromophobe; KIRP, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; PRAD, prostate adenocarcinoma; SKCM, skin cutaneous melanoma; UCEC, uterine corpus endometrial; BLCA, bladder urothelial carcinoma; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; LGG, lower grade glioma; LSCC, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma; HNSC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; ESCA, esophageal carcinoma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; SARC, sarcoma; PCPG, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma; CHOL, cholangiocarcinoma; PAAD, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; THCA, thyroid carcinoma; MESO, mesothelioma; THYM, thymoma; LAML, acute myeloid leukemia.
Correlation analysis between NCKAP1 and cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration
Cancer-associated fibroblasts, a key component of the dense stromal tumor microenvironment, contribute to the extracellular matrix [13]. To explore the correlation between cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration and NCKAP1 expression in different cancer types, we utilized the EPIC and TIDE algorithms. A positive correlation was observed between NCKAP1 expression and cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration in ACC, BRCA, cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC), LGG, and STAD (all P < 0.001) (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Correlation between NCKAP1 expression and cancer-associated fibroblast immune infiltration. EPIC and TIDE algorithms were used to calculate the correlation between NCKAP1 expression and cancer-associated fibroblast immune infiltration in all tumor types from TCGA. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; EPIC, Extended Polydimensional Immunome Characterization; TIDE, Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
NCKAP1-related gene enrichment analysis
To investigate the functional mechanism of NCKAP1 in carcinogenesis, we used GEPIA2 to extract the top 100 genes with expression patterns similar to NCKAP1 from the TCGA datasets (Supplementary Table 1). Gene Ontology enrichment analysis discovered that these genes were related to the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 6A). Additionally, 50 genes co-expressed with NCKAP1 were identified using the STRING tool, further confirming their enrichment in actin cytoskeleton regulation (Supplementary Table 2 and Figure 6B). These findings suggest that NCKAP1 may contribute to these biologic processes through its interactions with actin cytoskeleton regulatory proteins. The BioGRID 4.4.219 database showed physical interactions between NCKAP1 and CYFIP1, WASF2, BRK1, and ABI2 (Figure 6C), and the expression levels of NCKAP1 were significantly correlated with those of CYFIP1, ABI2, and WASF2 (Figure 6D-G). Furthermore, the expression of CYFIP1, WASF2, ABI2, and C3ORF10 (BRK1) mRNAs also changed in various tumor tissues compared to corresponding normal tissues (Figure 7A-D). Taking these results into account, we speculate that NCKAP1 may play a tumor-inhibiting role in cancers by regulating actin cytoskeleton function facilitating cell disulfidptosis.
Figure 6.
NCKAP1-related gene enrichment analysis. A. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the top 100 genes co-expressed with NCKAP1 obtained by the GEPIA2. B. Co-expression network of 50 genes co-expressed with NCKAP1 obtained by the STRING tool. C. NCKAP1-protein interactions obtained by BioGRID. D-G. Correlation analysis between NCKAP1 and CYFIP1, WASF2, ABI2 and BRK1 conducted by GEPIA2 across all tumor samples from TCGA. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; GEPIA2, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis version 2.
Figure 7.
CYFIP1, WASF2, ABI2, and C3ORF10 (BRK1) expression status in different normal tissues. A-D. The expression status of CYFIP1, WASF2, ABI2, and BRK1 in different tumor types was visualized by TIMER2.0. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; LGG, lower grade glioma; BLCA, bladder urothelial carcinoma; KIRC, kidney renal cell carcinoma; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; OV, ovarian cancer; UCS, uterine carcinosarcoma; BRCA, breast invasive carcinoma; KICH, kidney chromophobe; KIRP, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; PRAD, prostate adenocarcinoma; SKCM, skin cutaneous melanoma; UCEC, uterine corpus endometrial; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; LGG, lower grade glioma; LSCC, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma; HNSC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; ESCA, esophageal carcinoma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; SARC, sarcoma; PCPG, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma; CHOL, cholangiocarcinoma; PAAD, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; THCA, thyroid carcinoma; MESO, mesothelioma; THYM, thymoma; LAML, acute myeloid leukemia.
Reduced expression of NCKAP1 in KIRC
We performed IHC staining of four cases of KIRC tissues paired with normal tissues from the HPA database to identify the expression of NCKAP1. The cohort included one female (age: 56 years), one male (age: 59 years) with KIRC, and one female (age: 70 years), one male (age: 56 years) with normal kidney. IHC results indicated that NCKAP1 was expressed in the cytoplasm/membranous structures of normal tubules; however, NCKAP1 expression was not detected in the tumor cells of KIRC tissues (Figure 8).
Figure 8.
Representative images of NCKAP1 expression in KIRC tissues and normal tissues. IHC staining for KIRC tissues of one female (age: 56 years) (A), one male (age: 59 years) (B), and normal tissues of one female (age: 70 years) (C), one male (age: 56 years) (D) from HPA database. Scale bar = 100 μm or 25 μm. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; KIRC, kidney renal cell carcinoma; HPA, Human Protein Atlas.
Overexpression of NCKAP1 suppressed cell growth in 786-O cells
The reduced expression of NCKAP1 was significantly correlated with various clinicopathologic characteristics, indicating that NCKAP1 may play a crucial role in KIRC tumor development. To validate this, 786-O cells were transfected with either an NCKAP1 overexpression plasmid (pEZ-Lv201-NCKAP1) or a control vector (pEZLv201). Post-transfection, qRT-PCR and western blot analysis confirmed the elevated levels of NCKAP1 mRNA and protein, respectively (Figure 9A, 9B). As illustrated in Figure 9C, the overexpression of NCKAP1 in 786-O cells resulted in a significant reduction in cell growth rate (P < 0.01).
Figure 9.
NCKAP1 overexpression in 786-O cell line suppressed the cell growth rate. Overexpression of NCKAP1 (OE) in a transfected 786-O cell line verified by qPCR (A) and western blot (B) compared to that of 786-O cells transfected with the control vector (Vector). GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) CCK-8 assay results showed the cell viability in 786-O-OE cells compared to 786-O-Vector cells. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; CCK-8, Cell Counting Kit-8.
Overexpression of NCKAP1 inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of 786-O cells
To assess the role of NCKAP1, we examined the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of 786-O cells overexpressing NCKAP1. Figure 10A showed that NCKAP1-overexpressing cells formed fewer and smaller colonies compared to the vector control group (P < 0.01). Moreover, overexpression of NCKAP1 led to reduced wound closure (P < 0.01) (Figure 10B) and decreased invasiveness (P < 0.01) (Figure 10C) in comparison to vector controls. These results indicated that NCKAP1 significantly affects the proliferation, migration, and invasion of 786-O cells.
Figure 10.
NCKAP1 inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro. Cell colony formation assay showed a statistically significant decrease of (A) 786-O-OE cells compared to 786-O-Vector cells. Wound-healing assay results showed a significant decrease of migration (B) 786-O-OE cells compared to 786-O-Vector cells. Scale bar = 200 μm. Transwell invasion assay results showed a significant decrease of invaded (C) 786-O-OE cells compared to 786-O-Vector cells. Scale bar = 100 μm. The results are mean ± SD values from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1.
Correlation analysis between NCKAP1 and immune cells infiltration in KIRC
We utilized the TCGA database via TIMER2.0 to investigate the clinical correlation between the NCKAP1 expression and tumor immune cells infiltration in KIRC. Our results indicated a positive correlation between NCKAP1 expression and infiltration of macrophages (P = 3.13 × 10-16), neutrophils (P = 3.78 × 10-8), CD4+ T cells (P = 6.53 × 10-6). However, there was no association with B cells (P = 8.90 × 10-2), CD8+ T cells (P = 4.77 × 10-1), or Myeloid dendritic cell (P = 4.38 × 10-1) infiltration in KIRC (Figure 11).
Figure 11.
Correlation analysis between NCKAP1 expression and immune cell infiltration in KIRC. The clinical association between macrophages, neutrophils, CD4+ T cells, B cells, CD8+ T cells, myeloid dendritic cell infiltration, and NCKAP1 expression in KIRC was investigated using TIMER2.0 from TCGA database. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; KIRC, kidney renal cell carcinoma; TIMER2.0, Tumor Immune Estimation Resource version 2; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Discussion
The dual-luciferase reporter assay has identified that Circ_NCKAP1 promotes the progression of skin basal cell carcinoma (BCC) by sponging the miR-148b-5p/HSP90 axis [14]. Similarly, Qing Ma’s study found that overexpression of miR-140-5p in patients with aortic dissection inhibits NCKAP1 expression, leading to reduced proliferation, migration, and invasion of vascular smooth muscle cells [15]. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), high NCKAP1 expression is significantly associated with low miR-34c-3p expression and correlates with a favorable prognosis [16]. Additionally, NCKAP1 has been identified as one of the five independent risk factors in a disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) model for prognostic evaluation of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and C-index of this model indicate its stable and reliable predictive effect on LUAD prognosis [17]. Despite these findings, the significance of NCKAP1 across various tumor types had not been comprehensively explored.
In this study, we systematically characterized NCKAP1 across 33 TCGA tumor types by analyzing features such as immune infiltration, genetic alterations, and gene expression. Our pan-cancer analysis suggests that NCKAP1 may serve as a prospective prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for KIRC.
NCKAP1 mutations were most prevalent in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC), followed by skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM), bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA), stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), and colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). Our analysis revealed that NCKAP1 alterations may act as a risk factor for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) patients, while potentially serving as a protective factor for LUAD patients. The TCGA program has provided extensive cancer genomics data, offering unprecedented opportunities to identify molecular aberrations in pan-cancer studies [18]. Our findings show that NCKAP1 is expressed in various tissues but is downregulated in BRCA, BLCA, GBM, PRAD, KIRC, KIRP, KICH, UCEC, and SKCM. Notably, low NCKAP1 expression is associated with poor DFS and OS specifically in KIRC, and is significantly linked to advanced cancer stages, suggesting a role in malignant progression. IHC staining revealed that NCKAP1 levels were significantly lower in KIRC tissues compared to normal tissues from the HPA database. These results are consistent with Chen’s findings, which showed that NCKAP1 is significantly downregulated in KIRC and correlated with advanced clinicopathologic features and poor prognosis [19]. Furthermore, our in vitro experiments demonstrated that overexpression of NCKAP1 in KIRC cell lines reduced cell growth, invasion, proliferation, and migration.
Genomic profiling has identified numerous genomic variants as significant cancer biomarkers, which could be developed into large-scale clinical studies [20]. Therefore, NCKAP1 may become a promising biomarker for the management or prognosis of KIRC. Additionally, the interaction between immune cells and cancer cells is crucial for cancer migration and metastasis [21,22]. We demonstrated that NCKAP1 is positively correlated with various types of immune cell infiltration, including macrophages, neutrophils, and CD4+ T cells in KIRC. Existing literature also highlights the role of NCKAP1 in the immune microenvironment [23].
In addition, we utilized STRING and GEPIA2 to identify genes co-expressed with NCKAP1 across various tumors and tissues. Gene enrichment analysis indicated a strong association with the regulation of actin cytoskeleton function, consistent with previous studies [24-28]. NCKAP1 physically interacts with key actin cytoskeleton genes, including CYFIP1, WASF2, ABI2, and BRK1. The expression of CYFIP1, ABI2, and WASF2 is highly correlated with NCKAP1 expression, further supporting our gene enrichment analysis. Activation of the WASF protein complex occurs through interaction with RAC1, and the Rac1-WASF3 complex no longer binds when NCKAP1 is inactivated [29]. NCKAP1 deficiency leads to partial resistance to disulfidptosis, likely involving disulfide bonding in multiple proteins, possibly including actin cytoskeleton proteins [8]. Activation of the WRC, including NCKAP1, promotes actin cross-linking, which is essential for the formation of lamellipodia and invadopodia, structures frequently used in cancer metastasis and invasion [30]. High expression of the NCKAP1 subunit of the Arp2/3-activating WAVE complex is associated with poor metastasis-free survival (MFS) in breast cancer, in contrast to the expression of Arpin, the Arp2/3 inhibitory protein [31]. Targeting the peptide at the interface between CYFIP1 and NCKAP1 has been shown to inhibit the metastasis and progression of lung and liver cancer cells [32]. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that glucose and disulfide may coordinately regulate actin cytoskeleton disulfide formation, leading to lamellipodia formation through the WRC, including NCKAP1 and other subunits in KIRC cells (Figure 12).
Figure 12.
Working model depicting how glucose and disulphide coordinately regulate the disulfide formation of the actin cytoskeleton formatting lamellipodia by WRC including NCKAP1 and other subunits in KIRC cells. NCKAP1, Nck-associated protein 1; KIRC, kidney renal cell carcinoma; WRC, WAVE Regulatory Complex.
This study has limitations, including the small sample sizes for rare tumor types, which may lead to inaccurate results. The findings linking NCKAP1 to cancer progression are preliminary and require further experimental validation to determine its precise molecular role in tumorigenesis. Additionally, only bioinformatic analyses were conducted, and no relevant basic experiments were performed. Validation experiments were limited to a single tumor cell line, and should be extended to more diverse cell lines. Concurrent in vivo experiments are also necessary.
In conclusion, while NCKAP1 expression is low in many cancers, it is specifically associated with poor DFS and OS only in KIRC, and correlates with advanced cancer stages, suggesting a role in malignant progression in KIRC. Overexpression of NCKAP1 in KIRC cell lines decreased cell growth, invasion, proliferation, and migration. Therefore, NCKAP1 may be a biomarker for the management and prognosis of KIRC. Additionally, NCKAP1 showed a notable positive correlation with immune cell infiltration, including macrophages, neutrophils, and CD4+ T cells in KIRC, suggesting that it may play a role in regulating disulfidptosis and tumor immunity. Further research is needed to explore the functionality of NCKAP1, particularly in KIRC.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the funds from Guiding Project of Qinghai Provincial Health Commission (2023-wjzdx-99), Science Popularization Work Creation Project of Wuxi Municipal Health Commission (P202310), Research Project of Jiangsu Province Maternal and Child Health Association (FYX202011), and Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Program (YB2020044).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Davalos V, Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics in clinical practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:376–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Galeano Nino JL, Wu H, LaCourse KD, Kempchinsky AG, Baryiames A, Barber B, Futran N, Houlton J, Sather C, Sicinska E, Taylor A, Minot SS, Johnston CD, Bullman S. Effect of the intratumoral microbiota on spatial and cellular heterogeneity in cancer. Nature. 2022;611:810–817. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05435-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim B, Kang SY, Kim KM. DNA-protein biomarkers for immunotherapy in the era of precision oncology. J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55:26–32. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2020.09.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim WR, Park EG, Lee DH, Lee YJ, Bae WH, Kim HS. The tumorigenic role of circular RNA-microRNA axis in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:3050. doi: 10.3390/ijms24033050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen X, Zhang D, Jiang F, Shen Y, Li X, Hu X, Wei P, Shen X. Prognostic prediction using a stemness index-related signature in a cohort of gastric cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:570702. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.570702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng X, Wang X, Nie K, Cheng L, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Peng W. Systematic pan-cancer analysis identifies TREM2 as an immunological and prognostic biomarker. Front Immunol. 2021;12:646523. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.646523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Limaye AJ, Whittaker MK, Bendzunas GN, Cowell JK, Kennedy EJ. Targeting the WASF3 complex to suppress metastasis. Pharmacol Res. 2022;182:106302. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu X, Nie L, Zhang Y, Yan Y, Wang C, Colic M, Olszewski K, Horbath A, Chen X, Lei G, Mao C, Wu S, Zhuang L, Poyurovsky MV, James You M, Hart T, Billadeau DD, Chen J, Gan B. Actin cytoskeleton vulnerability to disulfide stress mediates disulfidptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25:404–414. doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01091-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kwon MR, Lee JH, Park J, Park SS, Ju EJ, Ko EJ, Shin SH, Son GW, Lee HW, Kim YJ, Song SY, Jeong SY, Choi EK. NCK-associated protein 1 regulates metastasis and is a novel prognostic marker for colorectal cancer. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:7. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01303-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiong Y, He L, Shay C, Lang L, Loveless J, Yu J, Chemmalakuzhy R, Jiang H, Liu M, Teng Y. Nck-associated protein 1 associates with HSP90 to drive metastasis in human non-small-cell lung cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:122. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1124-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Swaminathan K, Campbell A, Papalazarou V, Jaber-Hijazi F, Nixon C, McGhee E, Strathdee D, Sansom OJ, Machesky LM. The RAC1 target NCKAP1 plays a crucial role in the progression of Braf;Pten-driven melanoma in mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:628–637. e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhong XP, Kan A, Ling YH, Lu LH, Mei J, Wei W, Li SH, Guo RP. NCKAP1 improves patient outcome and inhibits cell growth by enhancing Rb1/p53 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:369. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1603-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sunami Y, Boker V, Kleeff J. Targeting and reprograming cancer-associated fibroblasts and the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:697. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fan ZX, Xi W, Miao XY, Li LY, Miao GY. Circ_NCKAP1 promotes skin basal cell carcinoma progression by sponging the miR-148b-5p/HSP90 axis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:5355–5364. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202109_26642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma Q, Liu J, Li C, Wang D. miR-140-5p inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of vascular smooth muscle cells by suppressing the expression of NCKAP1. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2021;59:22–29. doi: 10.5603/FHC.a2021.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xiao CZ, Wei W, Guo ZX, Zhang MY, Zhang YF, Wang JH, Shi M, Wang HY, Guo RP. MicroRNA-34c-3p promotes cell proliferation and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by regulation of NCKAP1 expression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:263–273. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2280-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ni L, Yang H, Wu X, Zhou K, Wang S. The expression and prognostic value of disulfidptosis progress in lung adenocarcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 2023;15:7741–7759. doi: 10.18632/aging.204938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deng M, Bragelmann J, Schultze JL, Perner S. Web-TCGA: an online platform for integrated analysis of molecular cancer data sets. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17:72. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-0917-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen J, Ge J, Zhang W, Xie X, Zhong X, Tang S. NCKAP1 is a prognostic biomarker for inhibition of cell growth in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Genet. 2022;13:764957. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.764957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barbar J, Armach M, Hodroj MH, Assi S, El Nakib C, Chamseddine N, Assi HI. Emerging genetic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:20503121221132352. doi: 10.1177/20503121221132352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang C, Deng Z, Zang L, Shu Y, He S, Wu X. Immune cells regulate matrix metalloproteinases to reshape the tumor microenvironment to affect the invasion, migration, and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14:8437–8456. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nakamura Y, Kinoshita J, Yamaguchi T, Aoki T, Saito H, Hamabe-Horiike T, Harada S, Nomura S, Inaki N, Fushida S. Crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune cells in peritoneal metastasis: inhibition in the migration of M2 macrophages and mast cells by Tranilast. Gastric Cancer. 2022;25:515–526. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01275-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yan J, Fang Z, Shi M, Tu C, Zhang S, Jiang C, Li Q, Shao Y. Clinical significance of disulfidptosis-related genes and functional analysis in gastric cancer. J Cancer. 2024;15:1053–1066. doi: 10.7150/jca.91796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.De Rubeis S, Pasciuto E, Li KW, Fernandez E, Di Marino D, Buzzi A, Ostroff LE, Klann E, Zwartkruis FJ, Komiyama NH, Grant SG, Poujol C, Choquet D, Achsel T, Posthuma D, Smit AB, Bagni C. CYFIP1 coordinates mRNA translation and cytoskeleton remodeling to ensure proper dendritic spine formation. Neuron. 2013;79:1169–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dubielecka PM, Ladwein KI, Xiong X, Migeotte I, Chorzalska A, Anderson KV, Sawicki JA, Rottner K, Stradal TE, Kotula L. Essential role for Abi1 in embryonic survival and WAVE2 complex integrity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:7022–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016811108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nowak SJ, Nahirney PC, Hadjantonakis AK, Baylies MK. Nap1-mediated actin remodeling is essential for mammalian myoblast fusion. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:3282–3293. doi: 10.1242/jcs.047597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rakeman AS, Anderson KV. Axis specification and morphogenesis in the mouse embryo require Nap1, a regulator of WAVE-mediated actin branching. Development. 2006;133:3075–3083. doi: 10.1242/dev.02473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Innocenti M, Zucconi A, Disanza A, Frittoli E, Areces LB, Steffen A, Stradal TE, Di Fiore PP, Carlier MF, Scita G. Abi1 is essential for the formation and activation of a WAVE2 signalling complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:319–327. doi: 10.1038/ncb1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Teng Y, Qin H, Bahassan A, Bendzunas NG, Kennedy EJ, Cowell JK. The WASF3-NCKAP1-CYFIP1 complex is essential for breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2016;76:5133–5142. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Whitelaw JA, Swaminathan K, Kage F, Machesky LM. The WAVE regulatory complex is required to balance protrusion and adhesion in migration. Cells. 2020;9:1635. doi: 10.3390/cells9071635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lomakina ME, Lallemand F, Vacher S, Molinie N, Dang I, Cacheux W, Chipysheva TA, Ermilova VD, de Koning L, Dubois T, Bièche I, Alexandrova AY, Gautreau A. Arpin downregulation in breast cancer is associated with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:545–553. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cowell JK, Teng Y, Bendzunas NG, Ara R, Arbab AS, Kennedy EJ. Suppression of breast cancer metastasis using stapled peptides targeting the WASF regulatory complex. Cancer Growth Metastasis. 2017;10:1179064417713197. doi: 10.1177/1179064417713197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.












