Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Plant Pathology logoLink to Molecular Plant Pathology
. 2024 Sep 10;25(9):e70000. doi: 10.1111/mpp.70000

Root‐knot nematodes exploit the catalase‐like effector to manipulate plant reactive oxygen species levels by directly degrading H2O2

Zhaolu Zhu 1,2, Dadong Dai 1,✉, Mengzhuo Zheng 1,2, Yiling Shi 1,2, Shahid Siddique 3, Feifan Wang 1,2, Shurong Zhang 1, Chuanshuai Xie 1, Dexin Bo 1,2, Boyan Hu 1, Yangyang Chen 1, Donghai Peng 1, Ming Sun 1, Jinshui Zheng 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC11386320  PMID: 39254175

Abstract

Plants produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon infection, which typically trigger defence mechanisms and impede pathogen proliferation. Root‐knot nematodes (RKNs, Meloidogyne spp.) represent highly detrimental pathogens capable of parasitizing a broad spectrum of crops, resulting in substantial annual agricultural losses. The involvement of ROS in RKN parasitism is well acknowledged. In this study, we identified a novel effector from Meloidogyne incognita, named CATLe, that contains a conserved catalase domain, exhibiting potential functions in regulating host ROS levels. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that CATLe is conserved across RKNs. Temporal and spatial expression assays showed that the CATLe gene was specifically up‐regulated at the early infection stages and accumulated in the subventral oesophageal gland cells of M. incognita. Immunolocalization demonstrated that CATLe was secreted into the giant cells of the host plant during M. incognita parasitism. Transient expression of CATLe significantly dampened the flg22‐induced ROS production in Nicotiana benthamiana. In planta assays confirmed that M. incognita can exploit CATLe to manipulate host ROS levels by directly degrading H2O2. Additionally, interfering with expression of the CATLe gene through double‐stranded RNA soaking and host‐induced gene silencing significantly attenuated M. incognita parasitism, highlighting the important role of CATLe. Taken together, our results suggest that RKNs can directly degrade ROS products using a functional catalase, thereby manipulating host ROS levels and facilitating parasitism.

Keywords: catalase, CATLe, effector, Meloidogyne incognita, reactive oxygen species

CATLe, a novel secreted effector from root‐knot nematodes, exhibits catalase activity, regulates plant ROS levels by directly catalysing H2O2 decomposition, suppresses plant immune responses and promotes parasitism.

graphic file with name MPP-25-e70000-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Polyphagous root‐knot nematodes (RKNs, Meloidogyne spp.) are notorious soilborne pests that cause severe agriculture yield losses and are considered an important risk factor for global food security (Forghani & Hajihassani, 2020; Warmerdam et al., 2018). The infective second‐stage juveniles (J2s) of RKNs use a hollow protrusive stylet to penetrate the plant root elongation zone and migrate intercellularly toward the vascular cylinder, where they establish feeding sites and become sedentary (Abad et al., 2008; Nguyen et al., 2018). The feeding sites, composed of five to seven large multinucleate cells known as giant cells, serve as the primary nutrient pool for RKN growth and reproduction (Favery et al., 2020). The establishment of feeding sites, coupled with the proliferation of plant tissue surrounding the giant cells, results in the formation of knot‐like galls, impeding the transport of water and nutrients through the plant roots and ultimately leading to yield losses (Siddique & Grundler, 2018).

The oxidative burst, a hallmark of plant innate immunity characterized by the rapid, massive and transient production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including H2O2 and O2 −, plays important roles in plant's resistance against pathogens (Ali et al., 2018; Langebartels et al., 2002; Wu & Ge, 2004; Zhou et al., 2018). ROS can cause DNA oxidative damage, trigger a hypersensitive response (HR) to block pathogen colonization and serve as signalling molecules in plant defence cascades (Wang et al., 2020). Notably, ROS have been identified to play important roles in plant resistance against RKNs; for instance, the induction of increased ROS accumulation in rice resulted in reduced infection by the RKN Meloidogyne graminicola (Chavan et al., 2022; Holbein et al., 2016). To withstand the host‐derived ROS stress, RKNs have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to manipulate the ROS metabolism of host plants (Rutter et al., 2022). Previous research has confirmed that using effectors to suppress the host ROS production is an important strategy employed by RKNs. For instance, the effector Mg16820 from M. graminicola can interact with dehydration stress‐inducible protein 1 of plants to suppress ROS production (Naalden et al., 2018), while the effector MiPDCD6 from Meloidogyne incognita can inhibit ROS accumulation by suppressing salicylic acid‐mediated plant immunity (Kamaruzzaman et al., 2023).

Additionally, evidence indicates that the host ROS scavenging systems are important targets of RKNs. For example, the effector MgMO289 from M. graminicola can interact with rice copper metallochaperone heavy metal‐associated plant protein 04 (OsHPP04) to activate the host O2 •−‐scavenging system (Song et al., 2021). Similarly, the effector MjTTL5 from Meloidogyne javanica can enhance plant ROS scavenging activities through interaction with ferredoxin of Arabidopsis (Lin et al., 2016). In addition, ROS‐scavenging enzymes, such as peroxiredoxins in M. incognita, are localized within the nematode's hypodermis, suggesting a role in protecting the nematode's body against ROS (Dubreuil et al., 2011). While several effectors involved in regulating plant ROS have been identified in RKNs, their primary function is to regulate plant ROS levels by interacting with plant proteins or disrupting plant immune signalling pathways. However, whether effector proteins of M. incognita can directly target ROS products of host plants needs further investigation.

In this study, a novel effector with catalase activity, named CATLe, was identified from the sedentary endoparasitic nematode M. incognita. Our results suggest that CATLe is specifically up‐regulated at the early infection stages and localizes in the subventral oesophageal gland cells of M. incognita. Immunolocalization confirmed that CATLe can be secreted into plant giant cells, where it regulates plant ROS levels by directly catalysing the decomposition of H2O2. Comprehensive functional characterization underscores the critical role of CATLe in facilitating parasitism. These findings provide valuable insights into the mechanism by which M. incognita regulates plant ROS levels through effectors.

2. RESULTS

2.1. Identification of the M. incognita catalase‐like effector

In this study, we identified a protein named CATLe (Mi_08123.1) from the M. incognita genome (Genome_assembly_V1) (Dai et al., 2023) that contains a secretory signal peptide and a catalase domain, consists of 560 amino acids and has a calculated molecular weight of 61,803 Da (Figure 1a). Catalase is a core antioxidant enzyme in most organisms; it catalyses the decomposition of H2O2 into water and molecular oxygen (Baker et al., 2023). Notably, H2O2 is a major component of ROS, which inhibit pathogen infection and trigger local and systemic defence responses (Dutta et al., 2023). Thus, we speculated that CATLe may exhibit potential functions in regulating host ROS levels during M. incognita parasitism.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Characterization of the Meloidogyne incognita catalase‐like effector. (a) Primary structure of CATLe. (b) Phylogenetic tree of proteins homologous to CATLe based on the maximum‐likelihood method. The grey shapes represent the collapsed tree branches. (c) Reverse transcription‐quantitative PCR validation of relative expression level of CATLe in M. incognita at different infection stages. The fold‐change values were analysed by the 2−ΔΔCt method. The GAPDH gene of M. incognita was used as a reference. ***p < 0.001, Student's t test. Bars represent mean ± SD.

To explore the presence of CATLe in other plant‐parasitic nematodes, we conducted a genome‐wide homology search and secretory signal peptide prediction. As a result, we identified two proteins (Me_CAD2152589.1 and Me_CAD2127554.1) with a secretory signal peptide and a conserved catalase domain in the Meloidogyne enterolobii genome (Koutsovoulos et al., 2020), four proteins (Ma_07256.1, Ma_54782.1, Ma_21136.1 and Ma_32460.1) in the Meloidogyne arenaria genome and four proteins (Mj_49402.1, Mj_52533.1, Mj_51077.1 and Mj_50245.1) in the M. javanica genome. Multiple sequence alignment showed that these proteins shared high similarities with CATLe (Figure S1). Additionally, a homologue search identified 476 homologous proteins (E < 10−5) of CATLe in the NR database. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the proteins with a secretory signal peptide and a conserved catalase domain in different RKNs fall into one subgroup (Figure 1b). Quantification of CATLe transcripts by reverse transcription‐quantitative PCR (RT‐qPCR) at different infection stages of M. incognita confirmed that CATLe was strongly up‐regulated at 24, 48 and 72 h post‐infection (hpi) compared to the preparasitic J2s stage and almost no expression was observed at later stages (Figure 1c). These results suggest that CATLe is conserved among RKNs and may play an important role in the early stages of nematode parasitism.

2.2. CATLe is expressed in the subventral oesophageal gland and can be secreted into giant cells

As the effectors of plant‐parasitic nematodes are mainly secreted by subventral and the dorsal oesophageal gland cells, we performed in situ hybridization to investigate the localization of CATLe transcripts in M. incognita preparasitic J2s. A strong signal was detected in subventral oesophageal gland (SvG) cells with the digoxigenin‐labelled CATLe probe (Figure 2a), while no signal was observed in preparasitic J2s with negative controls (Figure 2b). Additionally, we generated an antibody to CATLe to investigate the immunolocalization of CATLe in preparasitic J2s. The specificity of the antibody was confirmed through western blot analysis, demonstrating a clear band of the anticipated size in the total proteins extracted from preparasitic J2s (Figure S2). As expected, immunolocalization showed that the CATLe was present in the SvG of preparasitic J2s (Figure 2c,d), which is consistent with the in situ hybridization result. These results suggest that CATLe could potentially act as an effector of M. incognita.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Localization of CATLe. (a) In situ hybridization (ISH) of digoxigenin‐labelled antisense CATLe probe to preparasitic Meloidogyne incognita second‐stage juveniles (J2s) indicates the transcription of CATLe in the subventral oesophageal gland (SvG). Bar = 20 μm. (b) No ISH signal was observed in the CATLe sense probe (right). Bar = 20 μm. (c–e) Immunolocalization with the anti‐CATLe antibody showed that the CATLe protein was present in the SvG of preparasitic M. incognita J2s. Bar = 20 μm. (e, f) Immunolocalization of the secreted CATLe protein in tomato tissues. CATLe accumulated in the giant cell. The images are shown by merging the differential interference contrast (DIC), DAPI‐stained nuclei and Alexa Fluor 488 fluorescence. N, nematodes; m, metacorpus; *, giant cells, bar = 20 μm.

To examine whether CATLe is secreted into host plants during M. incognita parasitism, the immunolocalization was performed on tomato gall sections. Western blot analysis confirmed the specificity of the antibody, as no signal was observed in samples from uninfected tomato plants (Figure S2). Immunohistochemistry conducted on sections of tomato root galls at 5 days post‐inoculation (dpi) revealed the presence of CATLe within the giant cells (Figure 2e,f). As anticipated, no signal was detected in planta when employing pre‐immune serum (Figure S3). These results confirm that CATLe is an effector that can be secreted into plant cells and is probably functional during M. incognita parasitism.

2.3. CATLe exhibits catalase activity and can dampen plant ROS production

To examine whether CATLe is a functional catalase that can catalyse the decomposition of H2O2, the CATLe‐coding sequence without the signal peptide was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3). Enzyme activity assays for purified CATLe demonstrated that CATLe had an enzyme activity of about 42,500 U/mg (Figure 3a). To examine its catalytic activity in vivo, CATLe (without signal peptide) was transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Subsequently, we detected the ROS production in N. benthamiana leaf discs under flg22 stimulation. A comparison with the negative control showed that ROS production was significantly decreased in N. benthamiana leaf discs under the expression of CATLe (Figure 3b). These results suggest that CATLe can efficiently dampen the flg22‐induced ROS production.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

CATLe exhibits catalase activity and suppresses reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst. (a) Catalase activity assay for purified CATLe. The Escherichia coli expression strain transformed with the empty vector served as a negative control. Bars represent mean ± SD. (b) CATLe suppressed the flg22‐induced ROS production in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 carrying CATLe‐coding sequence and red fluorescent protein (mCherry) was infiltrated into 4‐week‐old leaves of N. benthamiana. Leaf discs (diameter 4 mm) were collected and incubated with 100 nM flg22 after 48 h infiltration to perform the ROS assay. The curve was drawn by the average values of the relative luminescence unit (RLU). Bars represent mean ± SD. Control represents N. benthamiana with mCherry infiltration.

2.4. CATLe targets plant ROS products by directly degrading H2O2

To further confirm the role of CATLe in regulating host H2O2 levels, we silenced the expression of the CATLe gene in M. incognita preparasitic J2s through soaking with double‐stranded (ds) RNA. A 208 bp fragment of the CATLe‐coding sequence was selected as the interference target and the non‐target green fluorescent protein gene (gfp, 287 bp) was used as the negative control. After soaking M. incognita preparasitic J2s in dsRNA (CATLe/GFP), RT‐qPCR analysis showed a significant decrease in CATLe gene expression compared to the negative control, indicating effective silencing (Figure 4a). Subsequently, we inoculated the dsRNA (CATLe/GFP)‐treated nematodes onto tomato seed radicles. At 24 hpi, we measured the H2O2 levels in the infected radicles. Our results revealed a significant increase in H2O2 levels in tomato seed radicles infected by CATLe‐silenced nematodes compared to the negative control (Figure 4b). These results confirm that M. incognita employs CATLe to directly degrade plant H2O2.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

CATLe targets plant reactive oxygen species products by directly degrading H2O2. (a) Interference efficiency detection of CATLe gene by reverse transcription‐quantitative PCR. The fold‐change values were analysed by the 2−ΔΔCt method. The GAPDH gene of Meloidogyne incognita was used as a reference, ***p < 0.001. (b) CATLe silencing leads to an increased in host H2O2 accumulation. The H2O2 content in tomato seed radicles was measured at 24 h post‐inoculation, ***p < 0.001.

2.5. CATLe silencing affects M. incognita parasitism

To investigate the role of CATLe in M. incognita parasitism, we inoculated the dsRNA (CATLe/GFP)‐treated nematodes onto 4‐week‐old tomato seedlings and counted the galls at 20 dpi. We found that silencing the CATLe gene led to a significant reduction in both the number and size of galls induced by M. incognita infection compared to the negative control (Figure 5a,b). Additionally, we explored the role of CATLe in M. incognita parasitism using host‐induced gene silencing (HIGS). Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants expressing CATLe hairpin dsRNA were generated, with transgenic plants expressing GFP hairpin dsRNA serving as negative controls. After inoculating transgenic plants with nematodes, RT‐qPCR analysis at 5 dpi showed a significant decrease in CATLe expression in M. incognita compared to negative controls, indicating effective silencing of CATLe (Figure 5c). Moreover, there was a notable decrease in the number of galls induced by M. incognita (at 20 dpi) in the transgenic plants (Figure 5d). Overall, these results indicate that CATLe plays a crucial role in facilitating M. incognita parasitism.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

CATLe silencing affects Meloidogyne incognita parasitism. (a) CATLe silencing leads to a decrease in gall size induced by M. incognita infection. (b) CATLe silencing leads to a decrease in gall number induced by M. incognita infection. Four‐week‐old tomato seedlings were inoculated with 300 dsRNA (GFP/CATLe)‐treated preparasitic J2s and galls were counted at 20 days post‐inoculation (dpi). (c) Expression level of CATLe gene detected by reverse transcription‐quantitative PCR (RT‐qPCR). Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana lines expressing hairpin dsRNA (GFP/CATLe) were inoculated with 2000 preparasitic J2s. The infected roots were collected at 5 dpi and the RNA was extracted for RT‐qPCR. (d) Host‐induced gene silencing (HIGS) for CATLe decreased the gall number induced by M. incognita infection in N. benthamiana. The transgenic lines expressing hairpin dsRNA (GFP/CATLe) were inoculated with 200 fresh‐hatched preparasitic J2s. The galls were counted at 20 dpi. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, Student's t test. Bars represent mean ± SD.

3. DISCUSSION

As a principal ROS component, H2O2 plays a critical role in counteracting pathogen infection by inducing plant‐programmed cell death (Zhang et al., 2014). Moreover, H2O2 can also mediate downstream immune signalling in plants: some key phytohormones involved in the regulation of plant stress response, including salicylic acid, jasmonates, abscisic acid and ethylene, employ H2O2 in their signalling cascades in an either upstream or downstream manner (Saxena et al., 2016). In addition, H2O2 is relatively stable and can diffuse among cellular compartments or cells, which facilitates its signalling functions (Bienert et al., 2007; Henzler & Steudle, 2000). Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to the role of H2O2 in the interaction between pathogens and plants. For instance, it has been identified to play a critical role in the susceptibility of Brassica napus to Leptosphaeria maculans (Nováková et al., 2016). PsCAT1, a monofunctional heme‐containing catalase secreted by Puccinia striiformis, acts as an important pathogenic factor to facilitate the infection of P. striiformis by scavenging host‐derived H2O2 (Yuan et al., 2021). Similarly, Blumeria graminis can also secrete extracellular catalase to clear H2O2 during infection of barley (Zhang et al., 2004).

In this study, through an investigation into effectors modulating plant ROS levels during the initial infection stages of M. incognita, we discovered a novel effector, CATLe, that exhibits catalase activity and is specifically up‐regulated during the early infection stages (Figures 1c and 3a). In vitro and in planta assays confirmed the critical roles of CATLe in suppressing the plant ROS burst and regulating plant H2O2 levels (Figures 3b and 4b). Interestingly, recent research identified a C‐type lectin (CTL)‐like effector from M. incognita, named MiCTL1a, that has been shown to interact with the catalase of plants, inhibiting its activity (Zhao et al., 2021). Through expression pattern analysis and RT‐qPCR validation, we showed that CATLe and MiCTL1a were simultaneously up‐regulated during early infection stages (Figure 1c; Figure S4). Therefore, based on these findings, we propose that M. incognita can use the effector MiCTL1a to interact with plant catalase and reduce its activity, potentially inhibiting H2O2 decomposition by plants, and subsequently employs the effector CATLe to further degrade plant H2O2 (Figure 6). This mechanism may enable nematodes to autonomously regulate the H2O2 levels of plants.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Schematic illustration depicts how Meloidogyne incognita uses effectors to manipulate the plant H2O2 levels during early infection. M. incognita secretes MiCTL1a to interact with plant catalase, suppressing its activity and preventing H2O2 decomposition by plants. M. incognita also secretes CATLe to catalyse H2O2 decomposition, potentially enabling nematodes to autonomously regulate the H2O2 levels of plants.

Because RKNs are obligate biotrophic parasites, the manipulation of plant H2O2 levels implies that successful parasitism of RKNs requires the maintenance of a certain level of H2O2. There have been increasing studies indicating that H2O2 is a critical signalling molecule that mediates a variety of biological processes in plants such as cell differentiation and proliferation (Holmström & Finkel, 2014; Huang et al., 2019). The H2O2 levels have also been demonstrated to play important roles in meristem enlargement, cell expansion and cell wall extensibility (Liszkay et al., 2004; Tsukagoshi et al., 2010). More importantly, previous research has indicated that H2O2 is also accumulated in the cell wall of giant cells in feeding sites induced by RKNs (Melillo et al., 2006). The formation of feeding sites induced by RKNs involves complex manipulation of host signal transduction to activate the redifferentiation of root cells into hypertrophied and multinucleate giant cells (Medina et al., 2017; Mejias et al., 2021; Noureddine et al., 2022). In this study, silencing the CATLe of M. incognita not only altered the plant H2O2 levels but also resulted in a smaller gall size induced by M. incognita (Figures 4b and 5a). These results suggest that the regulation of plant H2O2 levels is not only important for M. incognita to resist host‐derived ROS stress but also for it to induce the giant cells. Together, our research sheds light on the molecular mechanisms in regulating ROS levels employed by M. incognita and highlights the critical role of effector CATLe in promoting parasitism.

4. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

4.1. Nematode and plant materials

Meloidogyne incognita was propagated on glasshouse‐grown tomato (Solanum lycopersicum ‘Jinpeng No. 3’) at 25°C under 16 h:8 h, light:dark conditions. S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz 1706’ seeds were germinated to collect tomato seed radicles for the in planta assay. N. benthamiana was used to perform the ROS burst detection assay. Nicotiana tabacum was used to generate the transgenic plants.

4.2. Sequence analysis, alignment and phylogenetic tree

CATLe in RKNs was obtained from newly published Meloidogyne genomic resources (Genome_assembly_V1) (Dai et al., 2023). Protein domain annotation was performed on SMART (https://smart.embl.de/). The homologous proteins of CATLe were identified from NR database using Diamond BLASTP (v. 2.0.4.142) with E  < 10−5. Multiple sequence alignment of protein sequences was performed by MUSCLE (v. 3.8.1551) (Edgar, 2004) and trimmed by trimAL (v. 1.4.rev22) (Capella‐Gutiérrez et al., 2009). The trimmed alignments were then used to construct the phylogenetic tree by IQ‐TREE (v. 2.0.3) (Nguyen et al., 2015) with 1000 bootstrap replicates and the LG + R8 model. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using iTOL (Letunic & Bork, 2019).

4.3. RNA extraction and quantitative real‐time PCR

The total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using HiScript III All‐in‐one RT SuperMix Perfect for qPCR (Vazyme). The expression of genes was determined using the Hieff UNICON Universal Blue qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (YEASEN) by RT‐qPCR. The relative changes in gene expression were determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

4.4. In situ hybridization and immunolocalization of CATLe

With a simple modification of the previously described method (Jaouannet et al., 2018), the digoxigenin (DIG)‐labelled specific probe was amplified with specific primers (Table S1). In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed on fresh‐hatched preparasitic J2s of M. incognita using the MyLab DIG Labeling and Hybridization Detection System‐DIG DNA PCR Labeling Kit (MyLab Corp.) according to the description of the manufacturer. Briefly, the nematodes were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 24 h and chopped on a glass slide. Proteinase K (1 mg/mL) was used to digest the chopped nematodes for 2 h. The nematode was hybridized with a DIG‐labelled specific probe at 40°C for 16 h and then the hybridization signal was detected with anti‐DIG antibodies and observed under a microscope.

The polyclonal antibody against CATLe was produced by ABclonal Biotech Co. Ltd against a specific peptide (C‐AEYWNELSPVDRQH). The specificity of anti‐CATLe antibodies was confirmed by western blot. The immunolocalization on M. incognita preparasitic J2s was performed as previously described (Zhao et al., 2020, 2021). Briefly, the preparasitic J2s of M. incognita were used to perform the immunolocalization directly with the anti‐CATLe antibody (1:500) and the Alexa Fluor 488 fluorescence‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit antibody (1:5000). Nematodes incubated with pre‐immune serum served as a negative control. Results were imaged using confocal microscopy (FV1000; Olympus). To validate the accumulation of CATLe within the giant cells, the root galls were collected at 7 dpi and after paraffin embedding and sectioning, the paraffin was removed using a dewaxing solution (G1128; Wuhan Servicebio Technology). The gall sections were treated with ethanol solutions and incubated in a blocking solution of 1% bovine serum albumen for 30 min. Subsequently, the gall sections were incubated with anti‐CATLe antibody (1:200) at 4°C overnight. Then, after shaking and washing three times on a shaker for 5 min each time to destain them with phosphate‐buffered saline (pH 7.4), the gall sections were treated with the Alexa Fluor 488 fluorescence‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit antibody (1:400). Finally, shaking and washing three times again, using 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) (Wuhan Servicebio Technology) to stain the cell nuclei and imaged using confocal microscopy. The gall sections incubated with pre‐immune serum served as a negative control.

4.5. Heterologous expression of CATLe and enzyme activity measurement

The CATLe‐coding sequence without signal peptide (Mi_08123.1, Mi_assembly_v1) was cloned and inserted into the prokaryotic expression vector pET‐15D. The recombined vector was then transformed into the expression strain E. coli Rosetta (DE3). Protein production was induced by adding 0.2 mM isopropyl‐β‐d‐thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to the cell culture. After 16 h of expression at 16°C, the His‐CATLe protein was purified using Ni‐agarose column (CWBIO) according to the description of the manufacturer. After purification, the eluted protein was concentrated and desalinized by a 30‐kDa cut‐off Centricon filter (Millipore).

To assess the enzyme activity of CATLe, the protein concentration of CATLe was measured firstly using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Coolaber) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Then, the enzyme activity of CATLe was measured following the previous descriptions (Zhao et al., 2021) using the Catalase Activity Assay Kit (Beyotime). A catalase activity assay on the purified protein from the same expression strain transformed with the recombinant vector and the empty vector was performed to exclude the possibility of catalase originating from bacteria.

4.6. ROS burst detection

The CATLe‐coding sequence without signal peptide (Mi_08123.1, Mi_assembly_v1) was amplified and inserted into the pCAMBIA1300s vector to generate a recombinant vector and then transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. The pCAMBIA1300s vector with mCherry was used as the control. The leaves of 4‐week‐old N. benthamiana were infiltrated with recombinant A. tumefaciens GV3101. The leaf discs (diameter 4 mm) expressing CATLe and mCherry were collected after 48 h of infiltration and incubated with 200 μL sterile water in 96‐well plates in the dark for 16 h. The ROS production of the leaf discs was measured in 100 μL detection buffer (34 μg luminol, 20 μg horseradish peroxidase and 100 nM flg22) using a microplate reader (Victor NIVO 3S; PerkinElmer). All experiments were performed three times and 16 leaf discs were analysed per treatment.

4.7. CATLe silencing and measurement of plant H2O2 content

The region (CDS683‐891bp, 208 bp) of CATLe‐coding sequence (Mi_08123.1, Mi_assembly_v1) was selected as the interference target to knock down the expression of CATLe using dsRNA soaking for preparasitic J2s. Non‐target green fluorescent protein coding sequence (gfp, 287 bp) was used as the negative control. The dsRNA was synthesized using T7 RNAi transcription kit (Vazyme) using specific primers (Table S1) and following the instructions of the manufacturer. A final concentration of dsRNA exceeding 1 μg/μL was obtained. RNAi was performed by soaking about 20,000 preparasitic J2s in 250 μL RNase‐free water containing 1 μg/μL dsRNA (CATLe/GFP) and 1% resorcinol. Three biological replicates were performed. After 24 h of soaking at 25°C, the soaking solution was removed and the dsRNA‐treated preparasitic J2s was recovered in 500 μL RNase‐free water for 2 h. The tomato seeds (S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz 1706’) were germinated as described above. The radicles with root hairs were immersed in dsRNA‐treated preparasitic J2s for 10 s and then transferred into the growth substrate (50% soil and 50% sand). The remaining dsRNA‐treated preparasitic J2s were collected to extract the RNA and detect the interference efficiency of RNAi.

After 24 h of infection at 25°C, the radicles were collected with the removal of excess nematodes by running water and used to measure the content of H2O2 by Hydrogen Peroxide Assay Kit (Beyotime) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the radicles were homogenized with the lysis buffer and centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4°C for 5 min. The supernatants were then transferred into a 96‐well plate and incubated with hydrogen peroxide detection solution for 30 min at 25°C. The absorbance was detected at 560 nm with a microplate reader (Victor NIVO 3S; PerkinElmer). The content of H2O2 was calculated according to a standard curve.

4.8. Infection assay of M. incognita

Infection assays were performed under infection by CATLe‐silenced preparasitic J2s using the HIGS and dsRNA‐soaking methods. The dsRNA soaking of preparasitic J2s was performed as described above. Four‐week‐old tomato seedlings (S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz 1706’) were inoculated with 300 dsRNA (CATLe/GFP)‐treated preparasitic J2s. Three biological replicates were performed and five tomato seedlings were inoculated per replicate. Galls were counted at 20 dpi. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t test.

For the HIGS method, the sense and antisense sequence of the region (CDS683–891 bp, 208 bp) in CATLe‐coding sequence (Mi_08123.1, Mi_assembly_v1) were cloned and inserted into pBWA(V)HS‐RNAi to generate the hairpin vector constructs using specific primers (Table S1). The recombined vectors were then transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101 and a positive colony was used to infect the leaf disc of N. tabacum. Transgenic N. tabacum plants were selected using 50 mg/L hygromycin. The genomic DNA was extracted from the potential transgenic N. tabacum (T0) and the transgenic lines were screened by PCR using specific primers (Table S1). The total RNA was isolated from the transgenic lines (T1) and the expression level of the dsRNA was detected by RT‐qPCR using specific primers (Table S1).

Transgenic N. tabacum expressing hairpin dsRNA of gfp was used as a control (generated by another research laboratory). The transgenic lines expressing hairpin dsRNA (GFP/CATLe) were inoculated with 2000 preparasitic J2s. The infected roots were collected at 5 dpi and the RNA was extracted for RT‐qPCR to measure the expression level of CATLe in nematodes. Three transgenic lines with a high expression level of hairpin dsRNA (CATLe) were inoculated with 200 preparasitic J2s and five plants were inoculated per line. The galls were counted at 20 dpi and statistical analysis was performed with Student's ttest.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supporting information

Figure S1.

MPP-25-e70000-s002.docx (1.6MB, docx)

Figure S2.

MPP-25-e70000-s005.docx (208.8KB, docx)

Figure S3.

MPP-25-e70000-s004.docx (490.1KB, docx)

Figure S4.

MPP-25-e70000-s001.docx (63.4KB, docx)

Table S1.

MPP-25-e70000-s003.xlsx (10.7KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Bingbing Xue (Huazhong Agricultural University, China) for his scientific advice and technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2040, 31970003 and 31970076) and Chinese Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662024JC014).

Zhu, Z. , Dai, D. , Zheng, M. , Shi, Y. , Siddique, S. , Wang, F. et al. (2024) Root‐knot nematodes exploit the catalase‐like effector to manipulate plant reactive oxygen species levels by directly degrading H2O2 . Molecular Plant Pathology, 25, e70000. Available from: 10.1111/mpp.70000

Contributor Information

Dadong Dai, Email: daidadong@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Jinshui Zheng, Email: jszheng@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

REFERENCES

  1. Abad, P. , Gouzy, J. , Aury, J.‐M. , Castagnone‐Sereno, P. , Danchin, E.G.J. , Deleury, E. et al. (2008) Genome sequence of the metazoan plant‐parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita . Nature Biotechnology, 26, 909–915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali, M.A. , Anjam, M.S. , Nawaz, M.A. , Lam, H.M. & Chung, G. (2018) Signal transduction in plant–nematode interactions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, 1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, A. , Lin, C.‐C. , Lett, C. , Karpinska, B. , Wright, M.H. & Foyer, C.H. (2023) Catalase: a critical node in the regulation of cell fate. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 199, 56–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bienert, G.P. , Møller, A.L.B. , Kristiansen, K.A. , Schulz, A. , Møller, I.M. , Schjoerring, J.K. et al. (2007) Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 1183–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Capella‐Gutiérrez, S. , Silla‐Martínez, J.M. & Gabaldón, T. (2009) trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large‐scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics, 25, 1972–1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chavan, S.N. , De Kesel, J. , Desmedt, W. , Degroote, E. , Singh, R.R. , Nguyen, G.T. et al. (2022) Dehydroascorbate induces plant resistance in rice against root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola . Molecular Plant Pathology, 23, 1303–1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai, D. , Xie, C. , Zhou, Y. , Bo, D. , Zhang, S. , Mao, S. et al. (2023) Unzipped chromosome‐level genomes reveal allopolyploid nematode origin pattern as unreduced gamete hybridization. Nature Communications, 14, 7156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubreuil, G. , Deleury, E. , Magliano, M. , Jaouannet, M. , Abad, P. & Rosso, M.‐N. (2011) Peroxiredoxins from the plant parasitic root‐knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, are required for successful development within the host. International Journal for Parasitology, 41, 385–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dutta, P. , Kumari, A. , Mahanta, M. , Upamanya, G.K. , Heisnam, P. , Borua, S. et al. (2023) Nanotechnological approaches for management of soil‐borne plant pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1136233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Favery, B. , Dubreuil, G. , Chen, M.‐S. , Giron, D. & Abad, P. (2020) Gall‐inducing parasites: convergent and conserved strategies of plant manipulation by insects and nematodes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 58, 1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forghani, F. & Hajihassani, A. (2020) Recent advances in the development of environmentally benign treatments to control root‐knot nematodes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henzler, T. & Steudle, E. (2000) Transport and metabolic degradation of hydrogen peroxide in Chara corallina: model calculations and measurements with the pressure probe suggest transport of H2O2 across water channels. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 2053–2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holbein, J. , Grundler, F.M.W. & Siddique, S. (2016) Plant basal resistance to nematodes: an update. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 2049–2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmström, K.M. & Finkel, T. (2014) Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox‐dependent signalling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15, 411–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, H. , Ullah, F. , Zhou, D.X. , Yi, M. & Zhao, Y. (2019) Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaouannet, M. , Nguyen, C.‐N. , Quentin, M. , Jaubert‐Possamai, S. , Rosso, M.‐N. & Favery, B. (2018) In situ hybridization (ISH) in preparasitic and parasitic stages of the plant‐parasitic nematode Meloidogyne spp. Bio‐Protocol, 8, e2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamaruzzaman, M. , Zhao, L.F. , Zhang, J.A. , Zhu, L.T. , Li, Y. , Deng, X.D. et al. (2023) MiPDCD6 effector suppresses host PAMP‐triggered immunity to facilitate Meloidogyne incognita parasitism in tomato. Plant Pathology, 72, 195–206. [Google Scholar]
  19. Koutsovoulos, G.D. , Poullet, M. , Elashry, A. , Kozlowski, D.K.L. , Sallet, E. , Da Rocha, M. et al. (2020) Genome assembly and annotation of Meloidogyne enterolobii, an emerging parthenogenetic root‐knot nematode. Scientific Data, 7, 324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  20. Langebartels, C. , Wohlgemuth, H. , Kschieschan, S. , Grün, S. & Sandermann, H. (2002) Oxidative burst and cell death in ozone‐exposed plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 40, 567–575. [Google Scholar]
  21. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. (2019) Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Research, 47, W256–W259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, B. , Zhuo, K. , Chen, S. , Hu, L. , Sun, L. , Wang, X. et al. (2016) A novel nematode effector suppresses plant immunity by activating host reactive oxygen species‐scavenging system. New Phytologist, 209, 1159–1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liszkay, A. , van der Zalm, E. & Schopfer, P. (2004) Production of reactive oxygen intermediates (O2 ˙−, H2O2, and ˙OH) by maize roots and their role in wall loosening and elongation growth. Plant Physiology, 136, 3114–3123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Medina, C. , da Rocha, M. , Magliano, M. , Ratpopoulo, A. , Revel, B. , Marteu, N. et al. (2017) Characterization of microRNAs from Arabidopsis galls highlights a role for miR159 in the plant response to the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita . New Phytologist, 216, 882–896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mejias, J. , Bazin, J. , Truong, N.m. , Chen, Y. , Marteu, N. , Bouteiller, N. et al. (2021) The root‐knot nematode effector MiEFF18 interacts with the plant core spliceosomal protein SmD1 required for giant cell formation. New Phytologist, 229, 3408–3423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Melillo, M.T. , Leonetti, P. , Bongiovanni, M. , Castagnone‐Sereno, P. & Bleve‐Zacheo, T. (2006) Modulation of reactive oxygen species activities and H2O2 accumulation during compatible and incompatible tomato–root‐knot nematode interactions. New Phytologist, 170, 501–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Naalden, D. , Haegeman, A. , de Almeida‐Engler, J. , Birhane Eshetu, F. , Bauters, L. & Gheysen, G. (2018) The Meloidogyne graminicola effector Mg16820 is secreted in the apoplast and cytoplasm to suppress plant host defense responses. Molecular Plant Pathology, 19, 2416–2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nguyen, C.N. , Perfus‐Barbeoch, L. , Quentin, M. , Zhao, J.L. , Magliano, M. , Marteu, N. et al. (2018) A root‐knot nematode small glycine and cysteine‐rich secreted effector, MiSGCR1, is involved in plant parasitism. New Phytologist, 217, 687–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nguyen, L.T. , Schmidt, H.A. , von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B.Q. (2015) IQ‐TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum‐likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32, 268–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Noureddine, Y. , Mejias, J. , da Rocha, M. , Thomine, S. , Quentin, M. , Abad, P. et al. (2022) Copper microRNAs modulate the formation of giant feeding cells induced by the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in Arabidopsis thaliana . New Phytologist, 236, 283–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nováková, M. , Šašek, V. , Trdá, L. , Krutinová, H. , Mongin, T. , Valentová, O. et al. (2016) Leptosphaeria maculans effector AvrLm4‐7 affects salicylic acid (SA) and ethylene (ET) signalling and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation in Brassica napus . Molecular Plant Pathology, 17, 818–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rutter, W.B. , Franco, J. & Gleason, C. (2022) Rooting out the mechanisms of root‐knot nematode–plant interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 60, 43–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Saxena, I. , Srikanth, S. & Chen, Z. (2016) Cross talk between H2O2 and interacting signal molecules under plant stress response. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Siddique, S. & Grundler, F.M.W. (2018) Parasitic nematodes manipulate plant development to establish feeding sites. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 46, 102–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, H.D. , Lin, B.R. , Huang, Q.L. , Sun, L.H. , Chen, J.S. , Hu, L.L. et al. (2021) The Meloidogyne graminicola effector MgMO289 targets a novel copper metallochaperone to suppress immunity in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72, 5638–5655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsukagoshi, H. , Busch, W. & Benfey, P.N. (2010) Transcriptional regulation of ROS controls transition from proliferation to differentiation in the root. Cell, 143, 606–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, S. , Wu, X.M. , Liu, C.H. , Shang, J.Y. , Gao, F. & Guo, H.S. (2020) Verticillium dahliae chromatin remodeling facilitates the DNA damage repair in response to plant ROS stress. PLoS Pathogens, 16, e1008481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Warmerdam, S. , Sterken, M.G. , van Schaik, C. , Oortwijn, M.E.P. , Sukarta, O.C.A. , Lozano‐Torres, J.L. et al. (2018) Genome‐wide association mapping of the architecture of susceptibility to the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in Arabidopsis thaliana . New Phytologist, 218, 724–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, J. & Ge, X. (2004) Oxidative burst, jasmonic acid biosynthesis, and taxol production induced by low‐energy ultrasound in Taxus chinensis cell suspension cultures. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 85, 714–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuan, P. , Qian, W.H. , Jiang, L.H. , Jia, C.H. , Ma, X.X. , Kang, Z.S. et al. (2021) A secreted catalase contributes to Puccinia striiformis resistance to host‐derived oxidative stress. Stress Biology, 1, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, M.X. , Li, Q. , Liu, T.L. , Liu, L. , Shen, D.Y. , Zhu, Y. et al. (2014) Two cytoplasmic effectors of Phytophthora sojae regulate plant cell death via interactions with plant catalases. Plant Physiology, 167, 164–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, Z. , Henderson, C. & Gurr, S.J. (2004) Blumeria graminis secretes an extracellular catalase during infection of barley: potential role in suppression of host defence. Molecular Plant Pathology, 5, 537–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, J.L. , Mejias, J. , Quentin, M. , Chen, Y.P. , de Almeida‐Engler, J. , Mao, Z.C. et al. (2020) The root‐knot nematode effector MiPDI1 targets a stress‐associated protein, SAP, to establish disease in Solanaceae and Arabidopsis . New Phytologist, 228, 1417–1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhao, J.L. , Sun, Q.H. , Quentin, M. , Ling, J. , Abad, P. , Zhang, X.P. et al. (2021) A Meloidogyne incognita C‐type lectin effector targets plant catalases to promote parasitism. New Phytologist, 232, 2124–2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhou, J. , Xu, X.C. , Cao, J.J. , Yin, L.L. , Xia, X.J. , Shi, K. et al. (2018) Heat shock factor HsfA1a is essential for R gene‐mediated nematode resistance and triggers H2O2 production. Plant Physiology, 176, 2456–2471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1.

MPP-25-e70000-s002.docx (1.6MB, docx)

Figure S2.

MPP-25-e70000-s005.docx (208.8KB, docx)

Figure S3.

MPP-25-e70000-s004.docx (490.1KB, docx)

Figure S4.

MPP-25-e70000-s001.docx (63.4KB, docx)

Table S1.

MPP-25-e70000-s003.xlsx (10.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

Articles from Molecular Plant Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES