Skip to main content
Turkish Archives of Pediatrics logoLink to Turkish Archives of Pediatrics
. 2024 Sep 1;59(5):488–493. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24103

Investigation of Physical Fitness in Children and Adolescents with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Case–Control Study

Sinem Bozcuk 1, Bilge Basakcı Calık 1, Elif Gur Kabul 2,, Zahide Ekici Tekin 3, Selçuk Yüksel 4
PMCID: PMC11391237  PMID: 39440414

Abstract

Objective:

Swelling, effusion, tenderness, and pain seen in the joints of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). This disease may cause limitation in joint movements, muscle weakness, atrophy, balance, and gait disorders. Physical fitness is accepted as an important determinant of health in both childhood and adolescence. The aim was to evaluate the physical fitness of children/adolescents with JIA and compare it with healthy peers.

Materials and Methods:

Seventy children/adolescents were included (35 JIA and 35 healthy). The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Brockport physical fitness test battery were used for evaluation. The Brockport physical fitness test battery consists of dominant handgrip strength, curl-up, push-up, trunk lift, shoulder stretch, sit and reach tests, skinfold thickness (calf/triceps/subscapular) measurements, and PACER 20 m test.

Results:

A significant difference was found in all sub-parameters of CHAQ (P < .05) and dominant hand grip strength (P = .037), curl-up test (P < .001), trunk lift test (P = .018), shoulder stretch (P < .001) and PACER 20 m test (P < .001) tests in favor of the healthy group.

Conclusion:

Children/adolescents with JIA demonstrated lower performance compared to their healthy peers in muscular and cardiovascular capacity tests (curl-up test, PACER 20 m test, trunk lift test, dominant hand grip strength test, and shoulder stretch test). Their functional abilities are more impaired, and they experience higher levels of pain and lower levels of general well-being compared to healthy peers.

Keywords: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, physical fitness, muscle strength, children, adolescent


What is already known on this topic?

  • Many studies in the literature demonstrate that children with JIA have lower physical fitness levels compared to healthy children. However, among these studies, only 1 evaluated physical fitness levels using a standard test battery, which assesses only strength and flexibility.

What this study adds on this topic?

  • To evaluate physical fitness in this study, the Brockport physical fitness test battery was preferred for its comprehensive subtests. This allowed for a detailed evaluation not only of strength and flexibility across multiple regions but also of fat and aerobic capacity. Consequently, children and adolescents with JIA demonstrated lower performance than their healthy peers in tests assessing muscular and cardiovascular capacity (curl-up test, PACER 20 m test, trunk lift test, dominant hand grip strength test, and shoulder stretch test), while their performance in the push-up test, skinfold thickness, and flexibility assessments was similar to that of their healthy peers.

Introduction

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) stands as the most prevalent rheumatic disease among children.1 Swelling, effusion, tenderness, and pain are seen in the joints in JIA. It may cause limitations in joint movements, muscle weakness, atrophy, and balance and gait disorders.2 Even though the daily energy expenditure in children with JIA appears comparable to that of healthy children, their participation in vigorous physical activities and sports is quite low.3,4

Physical fitness is accepted as an important determinant of health in both childhood and adolescence and is divided into 2 categories: health-related physical fitness (cardiorespiratory fitness, flexibility, muscular fitness, body composition, and neuromuscular relaxation) and performance-related physical fitness (speed, agility, reaction time, balance, strength, and coordination).5 During these periods, inadequate physical fitness has been associated with a range of problems (cardiovascular diseases, anxiety, depression, obesity, musculoskeletal disorders, and reduced quality of life).6,7

The physical fitness tests ensure a health fitness standard that prevents chronic diseases associated with a sedentary lifestyle. Additionally, intermittent assessments provide information to the researcher or clinician about the course of the disease.8-10 Therefore, it is important to evaluate all parameters of health-related physical fitness in a cost-effective and practical manner. Based on this idea, we chose the Brockport Physical Fitness Test battery. The Brockport Physical Fitness Test Battery was designed for both children with and without disabilities. This battery offers a detailed assessment with comprehensive subtests that evaluate strength, flexibility, fat, and aerobic capacity across multiple regions.11 Through a comprehensive evaluation of patients with JIA, the physical manifestations of the disease could be assessed in detail for the first time. There is only 1 study by Patti et al12 that evaluates physical fitness in patients with JIA using a standard test battery, which focuses solely on strength and flexibility. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the physical fitness (physical level, strength, flexibility, fat measurement, and cardiovascular capacity) of children/adolescents with JIA and compare it with healthy peers.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

This study was designed as a 2-group, case–control study. The JIA group was compared with the healthy group.

Recruitment

An enrollment period was from January 2020 to July 2020.

Participants

Thirty-five children/adolescents with JIA and 35 healthy children/adolescents with similar demographic characteristics to JIA were included. The JIA group was selected from patients fulfilling ILAR diagnostic criteria and attending regular follow-up at pediatric rheumatology. After excluding other causes of chronic arthritis such as malignancy, infections, systemic inflammatory, and metabolic diseases, these patients were accepted as having JIA at the time of diagnosis. The healthy group comprised children and adolescents who were accompanying individuals visiting the university hospital.

Inclusion criteria for the JIA group were: (a) diagnosed with JIA based on International League of Associations for Rheumatology diagnostic criteria13 by a pediatric rheumatologist, (b) aged between 10 and 17 years old, (c) consenting to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were: (a) difficulty in cooperation, (b) presence of neurological, pulmonary, orthopedic, and cardiovascular problems that affect the physical condition, (c) not having undergone any surgery in the last 6 months, (d) concomitant autoimmune or inflammatory disease.

Inclusion criteria for the healthy group were: (a) aged between 10 and 17 years old, (c) consenting to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were: (a) difficulty in cooperation, (b) presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, orthopedic, and neurological problems that affect physical condition, (c) not having undergone any surgery in the last 6 months, and (d) having any rheumatic disease.

Ethics

The ethics committee of non-interventional clinical research of Pamukkale University approved that there was no ethical problem in conducting this study at the meeting number of 60116787-020/92287 dated December 24, 2019. Participants were given verbal information about the study and signed written consent.

Measures

All evaluations were conducted by the same researcher under consistent test conditions. All participants’ demographic data, as well as disease-related information for JIA, were recorded. The functionality level was evaluated with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire, and physical fitness level with the Brockport Physical Fitness Test Battery. The evaluations were conducted in a single session using face-to-face interviews, each lasting approximately 45 minutes.

Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)

Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire is developed to evaluate functional abilities in children. It consists of 30 questions with 8 subsections (dressing, eating, reaching, arising, walking, grip, hygiene, activity). The scale also includes assistive device use, device use, pain, and general well-being. The original CHAQ showed excellent internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94), with a mean inter-item correlation of 0.6. The test–retest reliability, studied at a 2-week interval, revealed virtually identical scores measured on the 2 occasions (0.96 versus 0.96; P > .9 by paired t-test).14 The Cronbach’s alpha value of the Turkish version of the CHAQ was 0.7 for 6/8 (75%) domains of the CHAQ, excluding getting up (0.67) and eating (0.66). The intra-class correlation coefficients for the 8 CHAQ domains showed poor reproducibility with a median of 0.04 (range −0.5 to −0.4).15

Brockport Physical Fitness Test Battery

Brockport Physical Fitness Test contains 27 different tests. These tests evaluate the individual’s health-related physical fitness. It is possible to create a personalized test battery from these tests according to the individual’s disabilities and/or age groups among children and adolescents aged 10-17, both with and without disabilities.11 The test battery created for this study includes the following tests: (a) skinfold thickness measurement (calf, triceps, subscapular), (b) dominant hand grip strength, (c) push-up test, (d) sit and reach test, (e) trunk lift test, (f) shoulder stretch test, (g) curl-up test, (h) PACER 20 m test.

Sample Size

The G Power V.3.1.9.4 (University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany) was used to determine the appropriate sample size. In the power analysis performed based on the “General health” subsection score of the Child Health Questionnaire in the reference article,16 the effect size was found to be high (d = .757). Through power analysis, it was calculated that 58 participants enrolled in this study (29 children/adolescents with JIA, 29 healthy children/adolescents) would provide a 95% confidence interval and 80% power.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used in data analysis. Continuous variables were stated as mean ± standard deviation and median (minimum–maximum) values, categorical variables as n (%). The suitability of the variables for normal distribution was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Independent samples t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare independent group differences. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were performed to examine differences between categorical variables. In the statistical test results, the significance level was P < .05.

Results

Participant Flow

A total of 125 people, 84 with JIA and 41 healthy children/adolescents, were invited to this study. In the JIA group, 26 patients did not agree to participate in the study, and 23 patients could not be reached. In the healthy group, 6 people did not want to participate in the study. No injuries were reported during the evaluations.

Consequently, the study was completed with 35 children/adolescents with JIA (mean age 13.40 ± 2.31 years) and 35 healthy controls (mean age 12.94 ± 2.31 years).

Baseline Data

The mean height of the participants with JIA was 156.82 ± 11.66 cm, the mean body weight was 51.15 ± 14.45 kg, and the mean body mass index was 20.48 ± 4.26 kg/m2. The mean height of healthy participants was 153.42 ± 13.83 cm, the mean body weight was 49.31 ± 13.00 kg, and the mean body mass index was 20.61 ± 3.22 kg/m2. The groups were similar to each other in demographic data (P > .05, Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Participants

Variables JIA Group (n = 35) Healthy Group (n = 35) P
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Age (years) 13.40 ± 2.31 12.94 ± 2.31 .403**
Height (cm) 156.82 ± 11.66 153.42 ± 13.83 .411**
Body weight (kg) 51.15 ± 14.45 49.31 ± 13.00 .577*
Body mass index (kg/m2) 20.48 ± 4.26 20.61 ± 3.22 .886*
n (%) n (%)
Sex (female/male) 19(54.3)/16 (45.7) 21 (60)/14 (40) .629***
Dominant hand (right/left) 35 (100)/0 (0) 34 (97.1)/1 (2.9) 1.000£

*Independent samples test.

**Mann–Whitney U-test.

***Chi-square test.

£Fisher exact test.

JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Disease-related data of children/adolescents with JIA are shown in Table 2. According to their diagnoses, the distribution of children/adolescents with JIA participating in the study is as follows: 17 were oligoarticular, 4 were RF+ polyarthritis, 5 were systemic JIA, and 9 were enthesitis-related arthritis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Disease-Related Data of Children/Adolescents With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Variables JIA Group (n = 35)
n %
Family history
 Yes
 No

23
12

65.7
34.3
Medicine
 No
 NSAII
 Methotrexate
 Biological therapy

7
5
18
5

20
14.3
51.4
14.3
First symptom
 Swelling in joints
 Pain in joints
 High fever + rash
 Uveitis
 Difficulty walking
 Morning stiffness
 Bruising on hand

9
1 5
2
2
5
1
1

25.7
42.9
5.7
5.7
14.3
2.9
2.9
First joint involvement
 No involvement
 Bilateral knee
 Unilateral knee
 Bilateral ankle
 Unilateral ankle
 Bilateral wrist
 Unilateral wrist
 Unilateral hip
 Lumbar
 Unilateral PIP

2
1 1
8
3
3
1
2
2
1
2

5.7
31.4
22.9
8.6
8.6
2.9
5.7
5.7
2.9
5.7
Morning stiffness
 Yes
 No

11
24

31.4
68.6
Consanguineous marriage
 Yes
 No

5
30

14.3
85.7
Type of JIA
 Oligoarthritis
 RF+ polyarthritis
 Systemic JIA
 Enthesitis related arthritis

17
4
5
9

48.6
11.4
14.3
25.7

n, number of cases; %, percent; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joint.

Intergroup Comparison Results

As a result of the comparative analysis, there was a statistical difference in dressing (P = .008), eating (P = .011), reaching (P = .001), arising (P = .001), walking (P = .001), grip (P = .016), hygiene (P = .011), activity (P < .001) subsections and total score (P < .001), pain (P < .001) and general well-being (P < .001) of CHAQ and dominant hand grip strength (P = .037), trunk lift test (P = .018), curl-up (P < .001), PACER 20 m test (P < .001), and shoulder stretch (P < .001) tests of the Brockport physical fitness test battery in favor of healthy children/adolescents (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison Results of Functionality and Physical Fitness Levels of Children/Adolescents with JIA and Healthy Controls

Variables JIA Group (n = 35) Healthy Group (n = 35) P
Median (Min/Max) Mean ± SD Median (Min/Max) Mean ± SD
Skinfold thickness
-right triceps

14.0 (6.5/28)

14.21 ± 5.99

15.0 (3/27)

14.82 ± 4.74

.465**
-Left triceps 14.0 (5/31) 14.14 ± 5.75 15.0 (4/24) 14.65 ± 4.21 .671*
-Right subscapular 10.0 (5/20) 10.59 ± 4.39 10.0 (5/25) 10.91 ± 4.25 .675**
-Left subscapular 10.0 (5/22) 10.82 ± 4.53 11.0 (5/24) 11.54 ± 4.34 .377**
-Right calf 15.0 (4/31) 16.30 ± 6.81 14.0 (4/24) 13.77 ± 4.29 .068*
-left calf 15.0 (4/33) 16.50 ± 7.63 14.0 (2/24) 13.95 ± 4.41 .093*
Curl-up test 12.0 (0/26) 13.80 ± 6.77 21.0 (0/100) 26.68 ± 17.40 <.001**
Push-up test 4.0 (0/20) 5.11 ± 5.73 3.0 (0/40) 5.68 ± 8.58 .611**
Dominant hand grip strength 15.6 (6.8/33.86) 17.09 ± 8.18 19.8 (10.93/43.7) 21.25 ± 8.53 .037**
Trunk lift 24.0 (9/35) 24.47 ± 6.25 27.0 (14/38) 27.77 ± 5.02 .018*
PACER test (20 m) 9.0 (0/22) 9.77 ± 5.20 32.0 (8/88) 33.34 ± 18.94 <.001**
Sit-and-reach test (right) 124.0 (90/140) 121.60 ± 10.71 125.0 (112.5/140) 125.45 ± 5.99 .158**
Sit-and-reach test (left) 123.5 (90/138.5) 120.93 ± 10.82 124.5 (99/141) 124.50 ± 7.40 .160**
n (%) n (%)
Shoulder stretch
-Pass
-Fail

17 (%48.6)
18 (%51.4)

33 (%94.3)
2 (%5.7)

<.001***
CHAQ-Dressing 0 (0/3) 0.62 ± 1.08 0 (0/1) 0.05 ± 0.23 .008**
Eating 0 (0/3) 0.31 ± 0.75 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 .011**
Reaching 0 (0/3) 0.48 ± 0.88 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 .001**
Arising 0 (0/3) 0.37 ± 0.73 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 .001**
Walking 0 (0/2) 0.40 ± 0.69 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 .001**
Grip 0 (0/3) 0.54 ± 0.95 0 (0/2) 0.11 ± 0.40 .016**
Hygiene 0 (0/3) 0.31 ± 0.75 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 .011**
Activity 0 (0/3) 0.71 ± 1.12 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 <.001**
Total score 0.25 (0/2.88) 0.47 ± 0.67 0 (0/0.25) 0.02 ± 0.05 <.001**
Pain 20 (0/100) 31.17 ± 26.77 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 <.001**
General well-being 20 (0/100) 31.17 ± 26.56 0 (0/0) 0.00 ± 0.00 <.001**

CHAQ, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; JIA, juvenile adiopathic arthritis; Min, Minimum; Max, Maximum.

*Independent samples t-test.

**Mann–Whitney U test.

***Chi-square test.

Discussion

In the present study, children/adolescents with JIA demonstrated lower performance compared to their healthy peers in muscular and cardiovascular capacity tests (curl-up test, PACER 20 m test, trunk lift test, dominant hand grip strength test, and shoulder stretch test). However, they were at similar levels to healthy peers in push-up test, skinfold thickness, and lower extremity flexibility. Their functional abilities are more impaired, and they experience higher levels of pain and lower levels of general well-being compared to their healthy peers.

Children with JIA show lower participation in both daily living activities and physical activities compared to their peers, starting from a young age. These children may often fail to participate in recreational sports and daily physical activities because they do not have sufficient muscle strength, flexibility, aerobic capacity, endurance, or physical fitness levels.4

In the literature, many researchers have assessed the physical fitness levels of children and adolescents with JIA using various tests. These studies have highlighted that using a standardized assessment battery is crucial and suitable for evaluating the physical fitness of this population and also underlined that the results should be supported by other studies involving larger participant groups.9,12,17 When reviewing the literature, we observed that studies frequently assess physical fitness levels primarily with aerobic capacity. In our current study, we utilized the Brockport Physical Fitness Test battery, a standardized tool that comprehensively evaluates physical fitness across multiple dimensions, including muscular endurance, flexibility, aerobic capacity, and subcutaneous fat thickness.

Takken et al,17 in their review, reported that the VO2 peak levels of JIA were 21.8% lower compared to healthy individuals. Kwon et al8 found significant differences between the healthy group and JIA in muscle strength (back muscle strength, grasping power), muscle endurance (sit-ups), lung capacity, body composition, and functional ability. Children with JIA demonstrated lower physical capabilities. Risum et al9 showed that children with JIA had lower muscle strength (hand grip evaluations, isometric and isokinetic knee) and lower bone mineral density compared to their healthy peers. There was no significant relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition. Nesbitt et al10 revealed that children with JIA engaged in lower levels of daily moderate physical activity compared to healthy controls. The researchers also noted that peak VO2 values decreased with age and tended to be lower in females. They recommended considering age and sex factors when assessing children with JIA. In parallel with the literature, children with JIA had lower physical fitness compared to healthy individuals in the present study. Growth delays and reduced physical activity levels in JIA contribute to decreased muscle strength.8 The activity level of children with JIA is influenced by several factors, including disease severity, the child’s motivation, family expectations, and disease management. Overprotectiveness from families, overly restrictive attitudes toward childhood activities, and excessive support in daily activities may have a negative effect on the development of children’s gross motor skills.18 These children may engage in less physical activity compared to their healthy peers. Therefore, we hypothesize that the physical fitness of children with JIA is diminished relative to their peers, and their endurance in trunk flexor/extensor muscles is likely lower. However, upon examining the results of the push-up test, both groups had very low numbers of repetitions. This finding led us to consider that the push-up test might be challenging for this age group. Therefore, both groups struggled to complete the test, resulting in similar outcomes.

Patti et al12 studied a total of 56 children, including 39 healthy and 17 JIA. They evaluated physical fitness using a fitness test battery that included assessments such as the finger touch test, Abalakov test, sitting test, hand grip strength test, and sit-and-reach test. Consistent with our study, they found no difference between healthy children and those with JIA in the sit-and-reach test. It’s common for children with JIA to experience symptoms such as pain, joint involvement, and morning stiffness.19 For this reason, we anticipated that the flexibility of these children would be lower compared to their peers, but the results did not align with our expectations. This outcome may be attributed to the inherent flexibility typically observed in children, regardless of whether they are healthy or have a chronic disease. Patti et al12 observed differences in right and left-hand grip strength between children with JIA and healthy children. Similarly, our study found significant differences in favor of the healthy group when comparing dominant hand grip strengths. A pilot study suggested that this difference might be linked to the pain levels experienced by children with JIA.20 The lack of investigation into the reasons behind the decrease in grip strength can be viewed as a limitation of our study. In the present study, we observed that the aerobic fitness of children with JIA was poorer compared to healthy controls. Many studies have consistently reported lower aerobic fitness levels in children with JIA compared to their healthy peers, which supports our findings.17,21,22

Body composition is influenced not only by daily energy expenditure but also by individuals’ eating habits.23 In our study, we did not observe differences in skinfold thickness between the groups. We attribute this finding to the decreased physical activity during the pandemic period and changes in eating habits. Studies emphasize the importance of creating exercise opportunities to enhance physical fitness in children with JIA.24,25 Given the adverse effects of the pandemic, we advocate directing healthy children towards exercise to improve their physical fitness levels.

CHAQ scale is developed to evaluate functional abilities in children.14 Based on the academic search engine Scopus recommended by Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization, the CHAQ is used in nearly 2000 studies related to JIA.26 Therefore, we utilized the CHAQ scale in the current study. None of the participants were using assistive devices. Upon examining the functional level evaluations of children/adolescents with JIA and healthy controls, we found significant differences in all sub-parameters favoring the healthy group. This result indicates that the functional levels of children/adolescents with JIA were poorer than those of healthy children. Oliveira et al27 conducted a comprehensive study involving a total of 6639 participants, including 3315 healthy and 3324 JIA, from various countries. They found that the CHAQ scores were low in healthy participants. Our study’s findings are consistent with the results of this large population study.

In JIA, existing literature examines various aspects of physical fitness, with a predominant focus on aerobic capacity. In contrast, the present study distinguishes itself by comprehensively incorporating all parameters of physical fitness testing, including flexibility, muscle strength, aerobic capacity, and body composition. This comprehensive approach is a strength of the present study. However, there are some limitations in the present study. The first of these is that no information was obtained about the participants’ physical activities and regular exercise habits. Secondly, the study includes patients from all 4 subtypes of JIA. This may have influenced the results. If patients with a single type of JIA had been included, more accurate and specific data related to that JIA type could have been provided with a more homogeneous group. Thirdly, the total participation rate for the study was 41.7% in JIA patients and 85.4% in healthy controls. Since the patients were attending school, they did not want to spend time on evaluation in order not to miss more classes. We think that this rate is higher in children/adolescents with JIA because they miss more classes due to their disease than healthy individuals. This situation may cause underestimation or overestimation of the results.

Given the current condition of children with JIA, we emphasize the importance of a comprehensive assessment of their physical fitness across all parameters. We recommend using JIA-specific test batteries tailored to the disease and its subtypes. We advocate for the development of specific physical fitness assessments for JIA and its various subtypes in future studies.

Conclusion

In the present study, children/adolescents with JIA demonstrated lower performance compared to their healthy peers in muscular and cardiovascular capacity tests (curl-up test, PACER 20 m test, trunk lift test, dominant hand grip strength test, and shoulder stretch test). Their functional abilities are more impaired and they experience higher levels of pain and lower levels of general well-being compared to healthy peers.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by Pamukkale University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit through Project numbers 2020SABE015.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pamukkale University (approval no: 60116787-020/92287, date: December 24, 2019).

Informed Consent: Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from the participants who agreed to take part in the study.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept – B.B.C., S.Y.; Design – B.B.C, S.B., E.G.K., Z.E.T., S.Y.; Supervision – B.B.C., S.B.; Resources – Z.E.T., S.Y.; Materials – B.B.C.; Data Collection and/or Processing – S.B., E.G.K., Z.E.T.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – B.B.C., E.G.K.; Literature Search – S.B.; Writing – S.B., E.G.K.; Critical Review – B.B.C., S.Y.

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1. Long AM, Marston B. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rev. 2023;44(10):565 577. ( 10.1542/pir.2022-005623) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Woo P, Laxer RM, Sherry DD. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. In: Kasapcopur O, ed. Pediatric Rheumatology in Clinical Practice. İstanbul: Deomed; Medical Publishing; 2009:19 35. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Takken T, van der Net J, Helders PJ. Relationship between functional ability and physical fitness in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;32(3):174 178. ( 10.1080/03009740310002524) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cavallo S, Majnemer A, Duffy CM, Feldman DE. Participation in leisure activities by children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(9):1708 1715. ( 10.3899/jrheum.140844) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(1):1 11. ( 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Daniels ZS, Nick TG, Liu C, Cassedy A, Glauser TA. Obesity is a common comorbidity for pediatric patients with untreated, newly diagnosed epilepsy. Neurology. 2009;73(9):658 664. ( 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ab2b11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Marques-Vidal P, Marcelino G, Ravasco P, Oliveira JM, Paccaud F. Increased body fat is independently and negatively related with cardiorespiratory fitness levels in children and adolescents with normal weight. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(6):649 654. ( 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328336975e) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kwon HJ, Kim YL, Lee HS, Lee SM. A study on the physical fitness of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(3):378 383. ( 10.1589/jpts.29.378) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Risum K, Edvardsen E, Godang K, et al. Physical fitness in patients with Oligoarticular and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis diagnosed in the era of biologics: a controlled cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(12):1611 1620. ( 10.1002/acr.23818) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nesbitt C, Kuntze G, Toomey C, et al. Secondary consequences of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children and adolescents with knee involvement: physical activity, adiposity, fitness, and functional performance. Rheumatol Int. 2022;42(2):319 327. ( 10.1007/s00296-021-04920-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Winnick JP, Short FX. The Brockport physical fitness test manual. Champain. IL: Human Kinetics; 1999:1 117. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Patti A, Maggio MC, Corsello G, Messina G, Iovane A, Palma A. Evaluation of fitness and the balance levels of children with a diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(7):806. ( 10.3390/ijerph14070806) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thomson W, Barrett JH, Donn R, et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis classified by the ILAR criteria: HLA associations in UK patients. Rheumatol (Oxf Engl). 2002;41(10):1183 1189. ( 10.1093/rheumatology/41.10.1183) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Singh G, Athreya BH, Fries JF, Goldsmith DP. Measurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(12):1761 1769. ( 10.1002/art.1780371209) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ozdogan H, Ruperto N, Kasapçopur O, et al. The Turkish version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19(4):S158 S162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hulsegge G, Henschke N, McKay D, et al. Fundamental movement skills, physical fitness and physical activity among Australian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51(4):425 432. ( 10.1111/jpc.12733) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Takken T, Hemel A, van der Net J, Helders PJ. Aerobic fitness in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(12):2643 2647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pizzo A, Sandstrom A, Drobinin V, Propper L, Uher R, Pavlova B. Parental overprotection and sleep problems in young children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022;53(6):1340 1348. ( 10.1007/s10578-021-01199-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schanberg LE, Gil KM, Anthony KK, Yow E, Rochon J. Pain, stiffness, and fatigue in juvenile polyarticular arthritis: contemporaneous stressful events and mood as predictors. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1196 1204. ( 10.1002/art.20952) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Haberfehlner H, Visser B, Daffertshofer A, et al. Handwriting difficulties in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(5):887 893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. van Brussel M, Lelieveld OT, van der Net J, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Takken T. Aerobic and anaerobic exercise capacity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(6):891 897. ( 10.1002/art.22893) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pella E, Sgouropoulou V, Theodorakopoulou M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness assessed with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta analysis. Rheumatol (Oxf Engl). 2023;62(11):3526 3533. ( 10.1093/rheumatology/kead272) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. van der Merwe C, Münch M, Kruger R. Chronotype differences in body composition, dietary intake and eating behavior outcomes: a scoping systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(6):2357 2405. ( 10.1093/advances/nmac093) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tarakcı E, Kısa EP, Arman N, Albayrak A. Physical activity and exercise in patients with pediatric rheumatic disease: a systematic search and review. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021;56(3):179 186. ( 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21034) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tarakci E, Yeldan I, Kaya Mutlu E, Baydogan SN, Kasapcopur O. The relationship between physical activity level, anxiety, depression, and functional ability in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(11):1415 1420. ( 10.1007/s10067-011-1832-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Berberoğlu U, Ünal E, Dizmek P, et al. AB1062 Investigation of interaction between hand dexterity and parental attitude in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(suppl 2):1265.1 121265. ( 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.4944)26951640 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Oliveira S, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, et al. Proxy-reported health-related quality of life of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization multinational quality of life cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(1):35 43. ( 10.1002/art.22473) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Turkish Archives of Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Turkish Pediatrics Association

RESOURCES