Abstract
The formamidase (FMD) enzyme plays an important role in fungal thriving by releasing a secondary nitrogen source as a product of its activity. In Paracoccidioides species, previous studies have demonstrated the upregulation of this enzyme in a wide range of starvation and infective-like conditions. However, Paracoccidioides lutzii formamidase has not yet been defined as a virulence factor. Here, by employing in vivo infections using an fmd-silenced strain in Galleria mellonella larvae model, we demonstrate the influence of formamidase in P. lutzii’s immune stimulation and pathogenicity. The formamidase silencing resulted in improper arrangement of the nodules, poor melanogenesis and decreased fungal burden. Thus, we suggest that formamidase may be a piece composing the process of molecular recognition by Galleria immune cells. Furthermore, formamidase silencing doubled the observed survival rate of the larvae, demonstrating its importance in fungal virulence in vivo. Therefore, our findings indicate that formamidase contributes to Galleria’s immune incitement and establishes the role of this enzyme as a P. lutzii virulence factor.
Author summary
The study of fungal neglected pathogens is of significant importance for the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the diseases they cause. The Paracoccidioides lutzii fungus is a pathogen endemic to Latin America, which causes disease in vulnerable portions of society. To cause the disease, the fungal cells must overcome the immune system and obtain nutrients that are typically withdrawn by the host. In this regard, different molecules are crucial for the establishment of infection. The formamidase enzyme plays a role in the survival of the fungus P. lutzii. Our study, presented below, demonstrates that formamidase silencing affects the immune response of G. mellonella larvae to the fungus, resulting in impairment of nodule formation, diminished melanin production, and a reduction in fungal burden. Furthermore, silencing formamidase expression in P. lutzii doubles the survival rate of larvae infected by the fungus, showing its importance for these yeast cells to infect this animals.
Introduction
The genus Paracoccidioides comprises all the species of paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) agents [1]. It is widely distributed throughout South America [2,3], and Brazil presents the highest prevalence in that continent [4]. Once spores or mycelial fragments have been inhaled, the host’s body temperature triggers a morphological switch to the pathogenic yeast form [1].
During this initial contact, the human innate immune response ideally control the invasion through macrophages and neutrophils [5]. Phagocytosis is then a strategy usually aimed at killing microbes through acidic, oxidative [6,7] and nutritional stress [8]. However, as documented in Histoplasma capsulatum [9], Cryptococcus neoformans [10], Candida albicans [11], and Paracoccidiodes brasiliensis [12], some fungal pathogens carry molecular mechanisms to overcome cellular response within the phagolysosome or granulomes.
During the yeast-host interaction, carbon and nitrogen sources are a crucial role in fungal thrive [13]. However, these sources are intentionally scarce in the host environment. They are necessary for energy metabolism and protein biosynthesis. Therefore, once a yeast is challenged by macrophage nutritional depletion, it must obtain nitrogen and carbon from non-preferred sources to survive and multiply [14]. In this context, the mechanism of nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) plays an important role in regulating the scavenging, uptake and metabolism of non-preferred nitrogen sources in fungal pathogens [15]. The NCR mechanism was firstly explored in Aspergillus nidulans through investigations of ammonium, glutamine, and glutamate assimilation [15]. Studies conducted in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [16] and Neurospora crassa [17] have highlighted the role of this regulation in model fungi. In A. nidulans, the major regulator of NCR is the transcription factor AreA [18]. As a global acting modulator, AreA induces a set of various fungal genes related to metabolism of secondary nitrogen sources [19,20]. One of the NCR-modulated proteins is the formamidase (FMD) (E.C. 3.5.1.49). The FMD enzyme is a virulence factor of Aspergillus that exhibits in vitro hydrolase activity on formamide, releasing formate and ammonium [21]. These products may subsequently serve as wounding factors and alternative nitrogen sources [22].
Previous studies demonstrated that recombinant formamidase significantly reacts with sera from patients with PCM, but not with uninfected ones [23]. Additionally, this enzyme was found to be the most expressed protein in the yeast proteome during infection models, as well as in protein extract of isolated conidia [24–27]. Complementarily to these findings, the detection of formamidase as an exoantigen [28] and its presence in both the cytoplasm and cell wall [29] suggest that it plays a crucial role in host-pathogens interactions.
The Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in vivo model is an important tool for investigating pathogenic microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi [30–31]. Their immune system shares some mechanisms with that of mammals making them a viable model for this purpose [7,32]. One such response is that of differentiated hemocytes which resemble some mammalian defense cells. The four types of this cells function collectively to fight microbial proliferation [33]. For example, oenocytes and spherules transport and release molecular components, such as pro-phenoloxydase (PPO), the first protein in melanogenesis cascade [34]. In addition to these, plasmatocytes and granulocytes, which are adherent cells, are associated with phagocytosis, capsule formation, and nodulation [35]. Within the cellular response, nodules in Galleria’s resemble granulomes, which are structures created by cell aggregation that ideally isolate and kill fungi through immune enzymes and clotting factors [36]. A nodule is created when the number of fungal cells exceeds the phagocytosis capacity of a single cell. The conglomerates increase in size as new hemocytes attach to the surface.
During the later stages of nodulation, melanogenesis begins due to the degranulation of vesicles containing PPO enzyme by oenocytes [34]. The immune activity of melanin has been widely investigated in insects genus such as Drosophila [37], Aedes [38], and Galleria [39]. This pigment mediates fungal killing mainly through oxygen and nitrogen reactive species and cytotoxic intermediates [34]. The feasibility of Galleria’s in vivo model was demonstrated for P. lutzii [40], and P. brasiliensis within the Paracoccidioides genus [41]. Additionally, a comparison of both species’ virulence was conducted in this model [42].
Thus, we hypothesize that formamidase serves as both a molecular trigger for Galleria’s immune response and a virulence factor of P. lutzii contributing to yeast pathogenesis. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the influence of this enzyme on nodulation and mortality of P. lutzii after in vivo infection, building upon previous research. To achieve this, we injected an AS-fmd that had been silenced using antisense technology [43] into G. mellonella larvae. We then used histotechnological methods to stain and analyze the larvae’s tissues and plotted a Kaplan-Meyer survival curve (Fig 1).
Results and discussion
Formamidase contributes to nodular melanogenesis
Melanogenesis is a crucial mechanism for antimicrobial response in arthropods [37]. To investigate melanization patterns within the nodules, we stained tissue sections of larvae infected with both wild-type (WT) and silenced P. lutzii yeast cells (AS-fmd). To demonstrate the frequency and intensity of melanin spots, we split the blue channel of each image digitally [44]. No signs of melanization or nodulation were observed in the images obtained from both the PBS-injected and non-infected groups of larvae. Also, the peripheral plasmatocytes did not show any evidence of phagocytized content (S1 Fig). A significant difference in melanization pattern was observed between the wild-type and transformant infected groups of larva. Melanin indicators were present in all analyzed nodules from the wild-type-infected group, with higher intensity in certain sites. The pixel intensity of the images was evaluated digitally and demonstrated a notable discrepancy between the two groups of larvae. The group infected with the wild type exhibited a higher mean pixel count, indicating an elevated level of melanization (S2 Fig and S1 Table). The pixel intensity of the images was evaluated digitally and demonstrated a notable discrepancy between the two groups of larvae. The group infected with the wild type exhibited a higher mean pixel count, indicating an elevated level of melanization (S2 Fig and S1 Table). These sites involved the yeast cells beyond their cell walls, suggesting a major composition of immune melanin (Fig 2A–2C). The blue-channel images reveal multiples dark sites that suggest higher levels of melanin (Fig 2G–2I). These melanized sites make it difficult to accurately identify the exact shape of the yeasts. Conversely, the tissues collected from AS-fmd infected larvae display clear yeast shapes with light-brown regions that are typically confined to the cell wall (Fig 2D–2F). The reduced intensity of dark-brown sites suggests a cellular response with lower melanogenesis compared to the wild-type (Fig 2J–2L). These patterns of accumulation could also indicate presence of fungal melanin [45], that requires additional investigation.
Melanogenesis depends on the recruitment of oenocytes, which is driven by activated plasmatocytes [46]. Subsequently, oenocytes initiate the melanin synthesis cascade by delivering granules of PPO within the nodules. Melanin has been extensively proven to have antimicrobial properties through inference studies with PPO mutants [47,48]. Recently, its fungicidal activity was investigated in detail further supporting its role in microbial killing [39]. Furthermore, studies on Aspergillus terreus and Klebsiella strains demonstrated a correlation between an increase in melanin content and higher mortality rates of infected larvae [49,50]. Therefore, the observed impairment of melanogenesis in AS-fmd infected nodules indicates lower virulence of this strain as well as incomplete immune activation.
The arrangement of the nodules is influenced by formamidase
In insects, the nodular structure is usually well defined. It begins with an ordered recruitment of hemocytes based on pattern recognition. These granuloma-like bodies are mainly composed of phagocytic granulocytes and secretory cells [51]. To test the level of formamidase impact in the cell disposition of the nodules, we examined the overall nodule structure of the two groups of larvae. The wild-type infected group showed a finely organized structure (Fig 3A). Inside the nodule, the presence of brown-dark melanization sites, yeast cells and hemocytes–most likely granulocytes–is evident (Fig 3B). A well-defined basement membrane-like (BM-like) plasmatocytes clearly separates the nodule from the adjacent tissue (Fig 3C). Nodular isolation may represent an appropriate immune response to the pathogen. This sequestration of yeast cells toward the center keeps them closer to the aggregate of hemocytes and protects the surrounding tissue. In contrast, the mutant infected group showed a sparse distribution of yeast cells throughout the nodular structure (Fig 3F). In addition, the BM-like layer appears to be considerably thick with almost no morphological distinction from the granular inner cells (Fig 3H). Taken together, these results indicate that the nodule structure and hemocyte disposition are highly affected by formamidase levels.
In insects, nodule formation begins with the recognition of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). The three main PRRs involved in this process are the Toll Receptors (TR), Janus Kinase/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (JAK/STAT) and Immune Deficiency (Imd) pathways [52]. The Imd pathway is usually associated with DAMPs and Gram-negative bacteria signaling, while TR and JAK/STAT recognize fungal, viral, and Gram-positive bacteria molecules [53–55]. Once triggered, the PRRs signal the activation of the immune response. Starting with the attachment of granulocytes to the yeast cells, the nodule reaches the classical structure through granulocytes degranulation and agglutination. Subsequently, it leads to nodular growth due to plasmatocyte adhesion and spreading [56].
Previous studies have described enzymatic activity playing a role of DAMP in Drosophila species [57]. Moreover, PRRs are typically capable of recognizing a wide variety of microbial PAMPs, including peptides, glycans and saccharides [36,55]. Here, we propose that the decrease in FMD at protein level notated in AS-fmd [43] along with the nodular changes discussed is a step towards incomplete nodulation [58]. These findings suggest that formamidase may be involved in the process of triggering the immune response. Further investigation is required to elucidate the specific role of FMD in the generation of the immune response of G. mellonella though.
Formamidase is associated with increased fungal burden in the nodules
Tissue damage and scavenging of secondary nutrient sources are essential aspects for fungal survival during nodular isolation. To investigate whether formamidase silencing affects fungal load inside the nodules, we compared tissue slides stained with HE from both groups of larvae. The wild-type infected group showed an elevated fungal burden within the nodules (Fig 4). Despite the proper constitution of the BM-like layer, there is a predominance of yeast cells instead of hemocytes in the middle of the nodules (Fig 4A and 4B). In contrast, the AS-fmd showed a lower fungal burden and a higher recurrence of hemocytes within its nodules compared to the wild-type (Fig 4C and 4D).
The ability of Paracoccidioides to survive and even multiply inside phagocytes is well known [12,59]. A wide range of adaptative mechanisms are employed by the fungus to succeed in this harsh environment [6]. Previous studies demonstrated the importance of formamidase for P. lutzii survival in macrophages [43] and its potential as a virulence factor. In addition, its significant expression in in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo infections suggested formamidase as a crucial component of nitrogen metabolism inside the host [60]. Consistently, our findings indicate that formamidase operates by improving yeast endurance and/or multiplication inside the nodules.
Formamidase is a virulence factor of P. lutzii
Our group previously demonstrated that formamidase contributes to an increased survival rate of P. lutzii phagocyted by murine macrophages [43]. These results indicated the role of formamidase in the meaningful fungal resistance to innate immune response. To assess if formamidase contributes to fungal pathogenicity, we employed an in vivo infection of AS-fmd in G. mellonella following previous methods [40]. As controls we set a group of larvae injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Fig 5, red triangles) and another non-injected at all (Fig 5 green squares). An elevated survival rate was observed in the PBS group (90%). It demonstrates a minor impact of the trauma caused by needle insertion and the liquid inoculation itself in larval death. Despite the decrease compared to the saline group, non-infected larvae showed a similarly high rate of survival (75%), confirming little effect of the management conditions on the animals. This reduction in survival rate is explained by two death events caused by starvation inherent to the experiment. Between the infected groups, we found a survival rate of the wild-type group significantly lower than both controls’ (Fig 5). Inoculation of the wild-type strain culminated in only 35% survival (Fig 5, blue circle), highlighting the substantial pathogenicity of P. lutzii to Galleria. Conversely, as we expected, the survival rate of the AS-fmd infected animals was significantly higher than that of wild-type (70%) (Fig 5, purple diamond). Additionally, the mutant strain showed no significant difference in survival rate from those seen in control larvae (Fig 5).
Formamidase may support nutrient intake in scarce environments, raising fungal fitness. P. brasiliensis expressed formamidase in a ten-fold greater rate during broad nutritional starvation [61]. Interestingly, formamidase is induced in Paracoccidioides during iron deprivation [62], carbon starvation [63], and repressed in Histoplasma capsulatum under copper overabundance [64]. However, the role FMD in these conditions is still unclear. Studies conducted on wild-type strain of P. brasiliensis showed a six-fold increase in formamidase expression when grown on minimal medium compared to complete medium [61]. Additionally, P. lutzii upregulates formamidase during nitrogen depletion, suggesting its function in the acquiring this macronutrient [22]. These findings are consistent with previous studies of A. nidulans [21,65]. Despite there is no conclusion about the in vivo substrate of this enzyme [66] it has substrate looseness that could be operating on unspecific targets such as butanamide, acetamide, propenamide, and N-formyl-kynurenine. Thus, FMD is a crucial component to the response of fungal pathogens to nitrogen depletion due to ammonium production. These findings demonstrate that formamidase is especially required during nitrogen exhaustion to acquire and metabolize alternative sources of this nutrient.
Several studies demonstrated the significance of amidases in the pathogenicity of microbes. The role of ammonium produced by urea-specific amidase (urease, E.C. 3.5.1.5) in virulence has been well studied in bacterial species including Helicobacter pylori, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [67–69]. In C. neoformans, this outcome ammonium also serves as a nitrogen source and virulence factor along with growth signaling and yeast-yeast communication [70–72]. The same contributions of urease are observed in Coccidioides posadasii [73]. In addition, C. albicans has the ability of manipulate the phagosome acidic condition through ammonium extrusion [74]. In Aspergillus fumigatus, inhibition of the BET epigenetic virulence regulator resulted in reduced protein expression of a putative formamidase [75]. The BET protein family typically modulates multiple important virulence factors in fungi [76]. Within the same species, resistance to azoles is associated with increased formamidase abundance [77]. FMD was also identified as a component of extracellular vesicles of H. capsulatum [78]. These vesicles are often associated with fungal pathogenesis and host inflammation [79]. Therefore, in addition to nutrient scavenging, FMD may also exert its role as a virulence factor through tissue damage, fungal growth modulation, and cell signaling (Fig 6).
In Paracoccidioides species, FMD was identified in the cell wall, cytoplasm, and secretome of mycelia and yeast [29,80,81], indicating its expression and necessity for the fungi in different conditions. Additionally, its significant reactivity to PCM patients’ sera [23] and exoantigen status [28], highlight the potential of FMD to be efficiently recognized by the immune response. Moreover, its transcripts are highly induced in return to yeast exposition to human blood [82], in vitro and in vivo infections [60] and recovered from mice lungs [25], suggesting it as a step in host-colonization. Therefore, our findings are consistent with previous knowledge and demonstrate that FMD is a virulence factor that influences survival and innate immune response of Galleria larvae.
Material and methods
Paracoccidioides lutzii and Galleria mellonella maintenance
The larvae were maintained under diet of honeybee wax and pollen at 25°C until reaching 150–200 mg to start infection. Cream colored larvae were selected and placed in petri dishes for 24 hours without feeding at 25°C. P. lutzii wild-type (wild-type) cells were cultured in non-selective media Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) supplemented with 1.1% (w/v) glucose. The silenced strain (AS-fmd) was kept in selective solid BHI containing hygromycin B (75 μg/mL) supplemented with 1.1% (w/v) glucose. Both strains were cultivated at 36°C for 72 hours. Prior to the infection, both P. lutzii strains were inoculated in liquid BHI for 48 hours at 150 rpm. Finally, yeast cells were recovered for the in vivo infection.
Construction of the AS-fmd silenced P. lutzii strain
The P. lutzii formamidase gene (fmd) was silenced by the antisense RNA (aRNA) technique in conjunction with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (ATMT), as previously described [43]. Briefly, forward (5′ CCGCTCGAGCGGCTTGCATAACCGCTGGCATC 3′) and reverse (5′ GGCGCGCCTCGTCGGCGGAATCGTTATT 3′) oligonucleotides were designed to generate an antisense fragment (AS) of the P. lutzii formamidase gene. A binary plasmid (based on pUR5750) containing the AS-fmd and a gene for resistance to hygromycin B was then randomly inserted into the P. lutzii genome. Integration of this transfected cassette into the fungal genome was confirmed by conventional PCR using pUR5750 oligonucleotides.
In vivo infection of P. lutzii strains in G. mellonella
Both wild-type and silenced strains were harvested by centrifugation, washed three times, and then resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells underwent repeated mechanical force using a 5 mL syringe and filtration through a 40 μm nylon filter to diminish cellular clusters. The ventral region of the insect was sterilized with 70% ethanol prior to the injection of cells. Using a Hamilton syringe (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), we injected a yeast suspension containing 5x106 cells in a volume of 10 μl into the last pro-leg on the left side of the larvae [40]. During the ten-day period, the larvae were maintained in Petri dishes at a temperature of 37°C. The dead larvae were identified by steadiness after stimulation with forceps and then removed from the plate. The larvae in the inoculation control group were injected with 10 μl of PBS. For the environmental control group, the larvae did not undergo injection. Infections were carried out with a total of 30 larvae per group. [42]. All the death events were plotted to build a Kaplan-Meyer curve and underwent the Graham-Breslow-Wilcoxon and the Mantel-Cox statistic test with 95% confidence interval. The data analysis was performed on GraphPad Prism8 (www.graphpad.com).
Production and staining of the tissue slides
The two darker specimens from each group were measured and sectioned into three pieces of similar length. They were then placed in the tissue processor Leica TP1020 (Leica Biosystems, Germany), for 12 hours to undergo gradual ethanol and xylol baths before being embedded in paraffin. The sections were recovered from paraffinization and carefully arranged into solid paraffin blocks. The blocks were trimmed using the Leica RM2255 microtome (Leica Biosystems, Germany) with 16μm-width cuts until a full-faced section with all three tissue parts was visible. Following a 10-minute ice-cold water bath, the blocks were slowly sectioned at 8μm with uniform rotations. The resulting sections were then placed in a warm water bath using a small brush and transferred onto glass slides. The tissue sections were subjected to xylol-mediated deparaffinization, ethanol hydration, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin. The slides were dehydrated, fixed, and covered with a glass cover and Entellan™ mounting medium (Merck, Germany). All the images were then assessed using light microscopy with the Leica DM6 B microscope and the Leica DFC7000T camera, and processed with the software LAS X (Leica, Germany). The three image channels were split with the ImageJ software (NIH, United States), and the blue color channel selected to evidence melanized spots [44]. The melanin intensity of the spots was evaluated through digital analysis of the pixel intensity of six images from each infected group of larvae. Subsequently, a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was conducted on the data with 95% confidence.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was majorly financed by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) through CLB grant number 408042/2021-4. At the basal level, the techniques performed were also supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG), Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCT-IPH-FAPEG),; grant number INCT-IPH-FAPEG 201810267000022 to CMAS. CLB has a fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq- 308237/2022-6). EDP, TRM and JAM receive salary from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal Nível Superior (CAPES). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Brummer E, Castaneda E, Restrepo A, Microbiologia GD, Bogota SD. Paracoccidioidomycosis: an Update. 1993;6(2):89–117. doi: 10.1128/CMR.6.2.89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Muñoz JF, Farrer RA DC, Gallo JE, Sykes S, Sakthikumar S ME, Whiston EA, Bagagli E, Soares CMA T, MDM, Taylor JW, MJ Clay OK, Cuomo C CA. Genome Diversity, Recombination, and Virulence across the Major Lineages of Paracoccidioides. mSphere. 2016;1(5):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Turissini DA, Gomez OM, Teixeira MM, McEwen JG, Matute DR. Species boundaries in the human pathogen Paracoccidioides. Fungal Genet Biol. 2017;106(April):9–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martinez R. New trends in paracoccidioidomycosis epidemiology. J Fungi. 2017;3(1):1–13. doi: 10.3390/jof3010001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shoham S, Levitz SM. The immune response to fungal infections. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(5):569–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05397.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shen Q, Rappleye CA. Living Within the Macrophage: Dimorphic Fungal Pathogen Intracellular Metabolism. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 16 de outubro de 2020;10:592259. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.592259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith D F. Q., Casadevall A. Fungal immunity and pathogenesis in mammals versus the invertebrate model organism Galleria mellonella. Pathog Dis. 20 de março de 2021;79(3):ftab013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hood MI, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: Transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(8):525–37. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Seider K, Heyken A, Lüttich A, Miramón P, Hube B. Interaction of pathogenic yeasts with phagocytes: Survival, persistence and escape. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(4):392–400. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alvarez M, Casadevall A. Phagosome Extrusion and Host-Cell Survival after Cryptococcus neoformans Phagocytosis by Macrophages. Curr Biol. 2006;16(21):2161–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tavanti A, Campa D, Bertozzi A, Pardini G, Naglik JR, Barale R, et al. Candida albicans isolates with different genomic backgrounds display a differential response to macrophage infection. Microbes Infect. março de 2006;8(3):791–800. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moscardi-Bacchi M, Brummer E, Stevens DA. Support of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis multiplication by human monocytes or macrophages: Inhibition by activated phagocytes. J Med Microbiol. 1994;40(3):159–64. doi: 10.1099/00222615-40-3-159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Broach JR. Nutritional control of growth and development in yeast. Genetics. 2012;192(1):73–105. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.135731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ries LNA, Beattie S, Cramer RA, Goldman GH. Overview of carbon and nitrogen catabolite metabolism in the virulence of human pathogenic fungi. Mol Microbiol. 1o de fevereiro de 2018;107(3):277–97. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hynes MJ. Effects of ammonium, L-glutamate, and L-glutamine on nitrogen catabolism in Aspergillus nidulans. J Bacteriol. 1974;120(3):1116–23. doi: 10.1128/jb.120.3.1116-1123.1974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cooper TG, Sumrada RA. What is the function of nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? J Bacteriol. 1983;155(2):623–7. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.2.623-627.1983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fu YH, Marzluf GA. Characterization of nit-2, the major nitrogen regulatory gene of Neurospora crassa. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7(5):1691–6. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.5.1691-1696.1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kudla B, Caddick MX, Langdon T, Martinez-Rossi NM, Bennett CF, Sibley S, et al. The regulatory gene areA mediating nitrogen metabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans. Mutations affecting specificity of gene activation alter a loop residue of a putative zinc finger. EMBO J. 1990;9(5):1355–64. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08250.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao X, Zou H, Fu J, Chen J, Zhou J, Du G. Nitrogen regulation involved in the accumulation of urea in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2013;30(11):437–47. doi: 10.1002/yea.2980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nishimura A. Regulations and functions of proline utilization in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 24 de janeiro de 2024;88(2):131–7. doi: 10.1093/bbb/zbad165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fraser JA, Davis MA, Hynes MJ. The formamidase gene of Aspergillus nidulans: Regulation by nitrogen metabolite repression and transcriptional interference by an overlapping upstream gene. Genetics. 2001;157(1):119–31. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.1.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cruz-Leite VRM, Moreira ALE, Silva LOS, Inácio MM, Parente-Rocha JA, Ruiz OH, et al. Proteomics of Paracoccidioides lutzii: Overview of Changes Triggered by Nitrogen Catabolite Repression. J Fungi. 12 de novembro de 2023;9(11):1102. doi: 10.3390/jof9111102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borges CL, Pereira M, Felipe MSS, De Faria FP, Gomez FJ, Deepe GS, et al. The antigenic and catalytically active formamidase of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: Protein characterization, cDNA and gene cloning, heterologous expression and functional analysis of the recombinant protein. Microbes Infect. 2005;7(1):66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Parente-Rocha JA, Parente AFA, Baeza LC, Bonfim SMRC, Hernandez O, McEwen JG, et al. Macrophage interaction with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast cells modulates fungal metabolism and generates a response to oxidative stress. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lacerda Pigosso L, Baeza LC, Vieira Tomazett M, Batista Rodrigues Faleiro M, Brianezi Dignani de Moura VM, Melo Bailão A, et al. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis presents metabolic reprogramming and secretes a serine proteinase during murine infection. Virulence. 2017;8(7):1417–34. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1355660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chaves EGA, Parente-Rocha JA, Baeza LC, Araújo DS, Borges CL, Oliveira MAP de, et al. Proteomic Analysis of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis During Infection of Alveolar Macrophages Primed or Not by Interferon-Gamma. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(February):1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Elias Moreira AL, Milhomem Cruz-Leite VR, O’Hara Souza Silva L, Alves Parente AF, Bailão AM, Maria de Almeida Soares C, et al. Proteome characterization of Paracoccidioides lutzii conidia by using nanoUPLC-MSE. Fungal Biol. 2020;124(9):766–80. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2020.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moreira ALE, Oliveira MAP, Silva LOS, Inácio MM, Bailão AM, Parente-Rocha JA, et al. Immunoproteomic Approach of Extracellular Antigens From Paracoccidioides Species Reveals Exclusive B-Cell Epitopes. Front Microbiol. 2020;10(January). doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Borges CL, Parente JA, Barbosa MS, Santana JM, Báo SN, De Sousa MV, et al. Detection of a homotetrameric structure and protein-protein interactions of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis formamidase lead to new functional insights. FEMS Yeast Res. fevereiro de 2010;10(1):104–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Curtis A, Binder U, Kavanagh K. Galleria mellonella Larvae as a Model for Investigating Fungal—Host Interactions. Front Fungal Biol. 26 de abril de 2022;3:893494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Admella J, Torrents E. Investigating bacterial infections in Galleria mellonella larvae: Insights into pathogen dissemination and behavior. J Invertebr Pathol. setembro de 2023;200:107975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salzet M. Vertebrate innate immunity resembles a mosaic of invertebrate immune responses. Trends Immunol. 2001;22(6):285–8. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(01)01895-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lavine MD, Strand MR. Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. outubro de 2002;32(10):1295–309. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(02)00092-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.González-Santoyo I, Córdoba-Aguilar A. Phenoloxidase: a key component of the insect immune system. Entomol Exp Appl. janeiro de 2012;142(1):1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Satyavathi VV, Minz A, Nagaraju J. Nodulation: An unexplored cellular defense mechanism in insects. Cell Signal. agosto de 2014;26(8):1753–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dubovskiy IM, Kryukova NA, Glupov VV, Ratcliffe NA. Encapsulation and nodulation in insects. Invertebr Surviv J. 7 de julho de 2016;229–246 Pages. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tang H. Regulation and function of the melanization reaction in Drosophila. Fly (Austin). 15 de janeiro de 2009;3(1):105–11. doi: 10.4161/fly.3.1.7747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zou Z, Shin SW, Alvarez KS, Kokoza V, Raikhel AS. Distinct melanization pathways in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Immunity. 2010;32(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Smith DFQ, Dragotakes Q, Kulkarni M, Hardwick JM, Casadevall A. Galleria mellonella immune melanization is fungicidal during infection. Commun Biol. 1° de dezembro de 2022;5(1). doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04340-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thomaz L, García-Rodas R, Guimarães AJ, Taborda CP, Zaragoza O, Nosanchuk JD. Galleria mellonella as a model host to study Paracoccidioides lutzii and Histoplasma capsulatum. Virulence. 15 de fevereiro de 2013;4(2):139–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.de Souza Pitangui N, Fernandes FF, Aparecido da Silva T, Gonçales RA, Roque-Barreira MC. Role of paracoccin on Paracoccidioides brasiliensis virulence and susceptibility to antifungal drugs in the Galleria mellonella larvae model. Virulence. 31 de dezembro de 2023;14(1):2150455. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2150455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Scorzoni L, De Paula e Silva ACA, De Lacorte Singulani J Leite FS, De Oliveira HC, Da Silva RAM, et al. Comparison of virulence between Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Paracoccidioides lutzii using Galleria mellonella as a host model. Virulence. 1o de janeiro de 2015;6(8):766–76. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1085277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Silva LOS, Moreira TR, Gonçales RA, Tomazett MV, Parente-rocha JA, Mattos K, et al. Paracoccidioides lutzii Formamidase Contributes to Fungal Survival in Macrophages. Microorganisms. 2022;10(10). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Miot HA, Brianezi G, Tamega ADA, Miot LDB. Techniques of digital image analysis for histological quantification of melanin. An Bras Dermatol. agosto de 2012;87(4):608–11. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962012000400014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Smith DFQ, Casadevall A. The Role of Melanin in Fungal Pathogenesis for Animal Hosts. Em: Rodrigues ML, organizador. Fungal Physiology and Immunopathogenesis [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. [citado 15 de fevereiro de 2024]. p. 1–30. (Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology; vol. 422). Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/82_2019_173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pech LL, Strand MR. Plasmatocytes from the moth Pseudoplusia includens induce apoptosis of granular cells. J Insect Physiol. 2000;46(12):1565–73. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(00)00083-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nakhleh J, El Moussawi L, Osta MA. The Melanization Response in Insect Immunity. Em: Advances in Insect Physiology [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017. [citado 2 de março de 2024]. p. 83–109. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065280616300467 [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nappi AJ, Christensen BM. Melanogenesis and associated cytotoxic reactions: applications to insect innate immunity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35(5):443–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Insua JL, Llobet E, Moranta D, Pérez-Gutiérrez C, Tomás A, Garmendia J, et al. Modeling Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenesis by infection of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. Infect Immun. outubro de 2013;81(10):3552–65. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00391-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Maurer E, Browne N, Surlis C, Jukic E, Moser P, Kavanagh K, et al. Galleria mellonella as a host model to study Aspergillus terreus virulence and amphotericin B resistance. Virulence. 18 de agosto de 2015;6(6):591–8. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1045183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Arai I, Ohta M, Suzuki A, Tanaka S, Yoshizawa Y, Sato R. Immunohistochemical analysis of the role of hemocytin in nodule formation in the larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Insect Sci. 2013;13(1):125. doi: 10.1673/031.013.12501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stokes BA, Yadav S, Shokal U, Smith LC, Eleftherianos I. Bacterial and fungal pattern recognition receptors in homologous innate signaling pathways of insects and mammals. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 28 de janeiro de 2015. [citado 2 de março de 2024];6. Disponível em: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00019/abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Agaisse H, Perrimon N. The roles of JAK/STAT signaling in Drosophila immune responses. Immunol Rev. abril de 2004;198(1):72–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lindsay SA, Wasserman SA. Conventional and non-conventional Drosophila Toll signaling. Dev Comp Immunol. janeiro de 2014;42(1):16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Myllymäki H, Valanne S, Rämet M. The Drosophila imd signaling pathway. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 15 de abril de 2014;192(8):3455–62. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dean P. Microbial infection causes the appearance of hemocytes with extreme spreading ability in monolayers of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Dev Comp Immunol. junho de 2004;28(7–8):689–700. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2003.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Krautz R, Arefin B, Theopold U. Damage signals in the insect immune response. Front Plant Sci [Internet]. 11 de julho de 2014. [citado 22 de outubro de 2023];5. Disponível em: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2014.00342/abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu CT, Hou RF, Chen CC. Formation of basement membrane-like structure terminates the cellular encapsulation of microfilariae in the haemocoel of Anopheles quadrimaculatus. Parasitology. junho de 1998;116(6):511–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brummer E, Hanson LH, Restrepo A, Stevens DA. Intracellular multiplication of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in macrophages: Killing and restriction of multiplication by activated macrophages. Infect Immun. 1989;57(8):2289–94. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.8.2289-2294.1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Parente-Rocha JA, Tomazett MV, Pigosso LL, Bailão AM, Ferreira de Souza A, Paccez JD, et al. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models: A comparative analysis of Paracoccidioides spp. proteomic studies. Fungal Biol. 2018;122(6):505–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Castilho DG, Chaves AFA, Xander P, Zelanis A, Kitano ES, Serrano SMT, et al. Exploring Potential Virulence Regulators in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Isolates of Varying Virulence through Quantitative Proteomics. J Proteome Res. 3 de outubro de 2014;13(10):4259–71. doi: 10.1021/pr5002274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Parente AFA, Bailão AM, Borges CL, Parente JA, Magalhães AD, Ricart CAO, et al. Proteomic Analysis Reveals That Iron Availability Alters the Metabolic Status of the Pathogenic Fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. PLOS ONE. 28 de julho de 2011;6(7):e22810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lima PDS, Casaletti L, Bailão AM, Vasconcelos ATRD, Fernandes GDR, Soares CMDA Transcriptional and Proteomic Responses to Carbon Starvation in Paracoccidioides. Vinetz JM, organizador. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 8 de maio de 2014;8(5):e2855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Moraes D, Assunção L do P, da Silva KLP, Soares CM de A, Silva-Bailão MG, Bailão AM. High copper promotes cell wall remodeling and oxidative stress in Histoplasma capsulatum, as revealed by proteomics. Fungal Biol. 1o de dezembro de 2023;127(12):1551–65. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2023.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Donofrio NM, Oh Y, Lundy R, Pan H, Brown DE, Jeong JS, et al. Global gene expression during nitrogen starvation in the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genet Biol. 1o de setembro de 2006;43(9):605–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Skouloubris S, Labigne A, De Reuse H. The AmiE aliphatic amidase and AmiF formamidase of Helicobacter pylori: natural evolution of two enzyme paralogues. Mol Microbiol. maio de 2001;40(3):596–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jones BD, Mobley HL. Proteus mirabilis urease: genetic organization, regulation, and expression of structural genes. J Bacteriol. agosto de 1988;170(8):3342–9. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.8.3342-3349.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Eaton KA, Brooks CL, Morgan DR, Krakowka S. Essential role of urease in pathogenesis of gastritis induced by Helicobacter pylori in gnotobiotic piglets. Infect Immun. julho de 1991;59(7):2470–5. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.7.2470-2475.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Maroncle N, Rich C, Forestier C. The role of Klebsiella pneumoniae urease in intestinal colonization and resistance to gastrointestinal stress. Res Microbiol. março de 2006;157(2):184–93. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Palková Z, Janderová B, Gabriel J, Zikánová B, Pospíŝek M, Forstová J. Ammonia mediates communication between yeast colonies. Nature. dezembro de 1997;390(6659):532–6. doi: 10.1038/37398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Palkova Z, Forstová J. Yeast colonies synchronise their growth and development. J Cell Sci. 1o de julho de 2000;113 (Pt 11):1923–8. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.11.1923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Baker RP, Casadevall A. Reciprocal modulation of ammonia and melanin production has implications for cryptococcal virulence. Nat Commun. 15 de fevereiro de 2023;14:849. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36552-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mirbod-Donovan F, Schaller R, Hung CY, Xue J, Reichard U, Cole GT. Urease Produced by Coccidioides posadasii Contributes to the Virulence of This Respiratory Pathogen. Infect Immun. janeiro de 2006;74(1):504–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hernández-Chávez MJ, Pérez-García LA, Niño-Vega GA, Mora-Montes HM. Fungal Strategies to Evade the Host Immune Recognition. J Fungi. 23 de setembro de 2017;3(4):51. doi: 10.3390/jof3040051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Orekhova A, De Angelis M, Cacciotti A, Reverberi M, Rotili D, Giorgi A, et al. Modulation of Virulence-Associated Traits in Aspergillus fumigatus by BET Inhibitor JQ1. Microorganisms. novembro de 2022;10(11):2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sayou C, Govin J. Functions and inhibition of BET bromodomains in pathogenic fungi. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 1o de abril de 2022;34:100590. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Vermeulen E, Carpentier S, Kniemeyer O, Sillen M, Maertens J, Lagrou K. Proteomic differences between Azole-susceptible and-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2021;8(1):77–99. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Albuquerque PC, Nakayasu ES, Rodrigues ML, Frases S, Casadevall A, Zancope-Oliveira RM, et al. Vesicular transport in Histoplasma capsulatum: an effective mechanism for trans-cell wall transfer of proteins and lipids in ascomycetes. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(8):1695–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01160.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Silva VKA, Rodrigues ML, May RC. Deciphering Fungal Extracellular Vesicles: From Cell Biology to Pathogenesis. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. setembro de 2019;6(3):89–97. [Google Scholar]
- 80.de Oliveira AR, Oliveira LN, Chaves EGA, Weber SS, Bailão AM, Parente-Rocha JA, et al. Characterization of extracellular proteins in members of the Paracoccidioides complex. Fungal Biol. 2018;122(8):738–51. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Weber SS, Parente AFA, Borges CL, Parente JA, Bailão AM, de Almeida Soares CM. Analysis of the Secretomes of Paracoccidioides Mycelia and Yeast Cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bailão AM, Schrank A, Borges CL, Dutra V, Walquíria Inês Molinari-Madlum EE, Soares Felipe MS, et al. Differential gene expression by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in host interaction conditions: Representational difference analysis identifies candidate genes associated with fungal pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2006;8(12–13):2686–97. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]