An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
|
PMC Copyright Notice
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
2Department of Hospital Administration, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
✉
Address for correspondence: Dr. Meghana Prabhu, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India. E-mail: prabhus.meghana@gmail.com
Received 2023 Jan 7; Revised 2023 Apr 13; Accepted 2023 Apr 18; Issue date 2024 May-Jun.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Role of FDG PET/CT in evaluation of biliary tract diseases remains relatively unexplored. PET/CT with FDG helps in evaluation of both infective / inflammatory as well as neoplastic diseases as increased glucose utilization is observed in both the conditions. In this article, we describe the spectrum of FDG PET/CT findings in various diseases affecting the biliary tract. Role of FDG PET/CT in neoplastic diseases involving the biliary duct has been described at the time of staging and response evaluation; in characterization of the intrahepatic mass (abscess v/s cholangiocarcinoma). In addition, we have discussed about the false positive FDG uptake along the biliary duct stent, which interfere with scan interpretation. Few of the benign conditions described are Langerhans cell histiocytosis and IgG4 related disease involving the biliary duct and adenomyomatosis and Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis involving the gall bladder.
The biliary tract is subject to a wide variety of pathologic abnormalities, which include both benign and malignant etiologies. These conditions include inflammatory, infectious, malignant, congenital, and iatrogenic diseases. Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include carcinoma gallbladder, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and ampullary carcinoma. CCA is subdivided into intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), hilar CCA (hCCA), and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA). BTCs are rare and invasive tumors that account for approximately 0.7% of all malignant tumors in adults; it is the most common hepatobiliary cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma and accounts for 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of only 2%.[1,2,3] Surgery is the only curative treatment; however, the majority of patients with BTC (60%–70%) present with advanced or metastatic disease; therefore, palliative locoregional and systemic therapies are the only options of treatment.[4] The overall survival of patients with iCCA depends on tumor size, number of tumors, positivity for lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion.[2] Imaging plays a crucial role in the accurate diagnosis and staging of BTC as well as response assessment of therapy.[3] Information provided by conventional imaging techniques (such as computerized tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging) for some patients still remains insufficient. The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) in the evaluation of biliary tract diseases is relatively unexplored.[5]
Lamarca et al. published a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of FDG PET/CT for patients with BTC by studying 2125 patients. The role of PET/CT in diagnosis (T), staging (N/M), and relapse of BTC was assessed. The important conclusions of the study include the nonrecommendation of 18-FDG-PET for diagnosis (T) in the absence of cytology/histology. However, the authors recommend PET/CT to be used for staging (N/M) if the identification of occult sites of disease will alter management and also to identify relapse if suspicion persists following standard imaging. FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of the primary tumor showed a pooled sensitivity of 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.9–93.2) but had a low pooled specificity of 51.3% (95% CI 46.4–56.2) with the lowest specificity in hCCA (21.9%) and eCCA (27.7%).[5] CCA exhibits considerable variability in 18F-FDG uptake, which was correlated with a weak expression of hexokinase-2.[6] A pooled sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI 82.6–92.8) and a pooled specificity of 69.1% (95% CI 63.8–74.1) were reported for the detection of lymph node invasion and a pooled sensitivity of 85.4% (95% CI 79.5–90.2) and a high pooled specificity of 89.7% (95% CI 86.0–92.7) for the detection of distant metastases. FDG PET/CT had a pooled sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI 84.4–94.3) and a pooled specificity of 83.5% (95% CI 74.4–90.4) for the detection of relapse. The pooled proportion of change in management was observed in 15% (95% CI 11–20). 18-FDG-PET upstaged the disease with the identification of previously unknown sites of disease in 78% of patients.[5] Goel et al., in their prospective study, concluded that FDG PET/CT should be included in the preoperative staging workup of gallbladder cancer, particularly in locally advanced disease as PET/CT detected additional findings in 30.9% and altered the management of 23.4% of the cases due to detection of metastasis [Figures 1–5].[7]
However, due to FDG uptake in active infection and inflammation, low specificity in diagnosis and evaluation of biliary tract diseases is reported. Common causes of false positive uptake include infection related false positives within the bile duct, co-existence of biliary stents [Figure 4], various benign conditions such as Tuberculosis, adenomyomatosis and cholecystitis.[5,8,9] Clinical and imaging findings of patients with benign conditions involving the biliary tract such as Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) [Figure 6], IgG4 related sclerosing cholangitis [Figure 7], adenomyomatosis [Figure 8] and Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) [Figure 9] are described.[10,11,12]
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
1.Tariq NU, McNamara MG, Valle JW. Biliary tract cancers: Current knowledge, clinical candidates and future challenges. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2623–42. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S157092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Lee Y, Yoo IR, Boo SH, Kim H, Park HL, Hyun OJ. The role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51:69–78. doi: 10.1007/s13139-016-0440-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Elias Y, Mariano AT, Jr, Lu Y. Detection of primary malignancy and metastases with FDG PET/CT in patients with cholangiocarcinomas: Lesion-based comparison with contrast enhanced CT. World J Nucl Med. 2016;15:161–6. doi: 10.4103/1450-1147.167605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Manne A, Woods E, Tsung A, Mittra A. Biliary tract cancers: Treatment updates and future directions in the era of precision medicine and immuno-oncology. Front Oncol. 2021;11:768009. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.768009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Lamarca A, Barriuso J, Chander A, McNamara MG, Hubner RA, ÓReilly D, et al. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) for patients with biliary tract cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019;71:115–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Paudyal B, Oriuchi N, Paudyal P, Tsushima Y, Higuchi T, Miyakubo M, et al. Clinicopathological presentation of varying 18F-FDG uptake and expression of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:83–6. doi: 10.1007/s12149-007-0076-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Goel S, Aggarwal A, Iqbal A, Gupta M, Rao A, Singh S. 18-FDG PET-CT should be included in preoperative staging of gall bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1711–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Maldjian PD, Ghesani N, Ahmed S, Liu Y. Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: Another cause for a “hot” gallbladder on 18F-FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W36–8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Lee KF, Hung EH, Leung HH, Lai PB. A narrative review of gallbladder adenomyomatosis: What we need to know. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:1600. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Zhao Z, Wang Y, Guan Z, Jin J, Huang F, Zhu J. Utility of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of IgG4-related diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34:119–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Jessop S, Crudgington D, London K, Kellie S, Howman Giles R. FDG PET-CT in pediatric langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;67:e28034. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Jain S, Karunanithi S, Singla S, Kumar A, Bal C, Kumar R. 18F-FDG PET/CT in worsening of primary sclerosing cholangitis concomitant with improved langerhans cell histiocytosis. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2014;33:386–7. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]