Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2024 Aug 30;90(9):e00510-24. doi: 10.1128/aem.00510-24

Isolation, characterization, and genetic manipulation of cold-tolerant, manganese-oxidizing Pseudomonas sp. strains

Ian Jones 1, Duncan Vermillion 2, Chase Tracy 1, Robert Denton 3, Rick Davis 4, Kati Geszvain 1,✉
Editor: John R Spear5
PMCID: PMC11409713  PMID: 39212379

ABSTRACT

Manganese-oxidizing bacteria (MnOB) produce Mn oxide minerals that can be used by humans for bioremediation, but the purpose for the bacterium is less clear. This study describes the isolation and characterization of cold-tolerant MnOB strains isolated from a compost pile in Morris, Minnesota, USA: Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 and DSV-1. The strains were preliminarily identified as members of species Pseudomonas psychrophila by 16S rRNA analysis and a multi-locus phylogenetic study using a database of 88 genomes from the Pseudomonas genus. However, the average nucleotide identity between these strains and the P. psychrophila sp. CF149 type strain was less than 93%. Thus, the two strains are members of a novel species that diverged from P. psychrophila. DSV-1 and MS-1 are cold tolerant; both grow at 4°C but faster at 24°C. Unlike the mesophilic MnOB P. putida GB-1, both strains are capable of robustly oxidizing Mn at low temperatures. Both DSV-1 and MS-1 genomes contain homologs of several Mn oxidation genes found in P. putida GB-1 (mnxG, mcoA, mnxS1, mnxS2, and mnxR). Random mutagenesis by transposon insertion was successfully performed in both strains and identified genes involved in Mn oxidation that were similar to those found in P. putida GB-1. Our results show that MnOB can be isolated from compost, supporting a role for Mn oxidation in plant waste degradation. The novel isolates Pseudomonas spp. DSV-1 and MS-1 both can oxidize Mn at low temperature and likely employ similar mechanisms and regulation as P. putida GB-1.

IMPORTANCE

Biogenic Mn oxides have high sorptive capacity and are strong oxidants. These two characteristics make these oxides and the microbes that make them attractive tools for the bioremediation of wastewater and contaminated environments. Identifying MnOB that can be used for bioremediation is an active area of research. As cold-tolerant MnOB, Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1 and MS-1 have the potential to expand the environmental conditions in which biogenic Mn oxide bioremediation can be performed. The similarity of these organisms to the well-characterized MnOB P. putida GB-1 and the ability to manipulate their genomes raise the possibility of modifying them to improve their bioremediation ability.

KEYWORDS: manganese oxidation, Pseudomonas, psychrotolerant, compost

INTRODUCTION

The transition metal manganese (Mn) is an essential micronutrient found in the Earth’s crust. As a transition metal, it can be found present in the environment in several possible redox states, including the soluble, reduced form Mn(II) and insoluble Mn(IV), which form Mn oxide minerals. While oxidation of Mn(II) to Mn(IV) can occur abiotically, microorganisms can increase the rate of reaction substantially (1). These organisms include the white rot fungi (2–4) and a wide variety of bacteria, including both gram-positive and gram-negative representatives (5, 6). The metabolic function of Mn oxidation is unclear. The resulting minerals may protect cells from environmental hazards, such as oxidative stress (7). Alternatively, the reactive Mn oxide minerals may allow the bacteria to degrade complex organics to digestible byproducts; the minerals themselves can serve as reservoirs of organic carbon (8, 9). Work from Yu and Leadbetter has shown that some species of bacteria can derive energy directly from the thermodynamically favorable oxidation of Mn (10).

In the environment, Mn oxidation may play a role in the breakdown of plant material. The concentration and redox state of Mn in leaf litter strongly correlate with the rate of litter decomposition (11), and the ability of forest ecosystems to store carbon is negatively correlated with Mn concentration (12). A significant component of plant litter is the cell wall component lignin. Lignin is a large, three-dimensional polymer of phenylpropanoid subunits; its large size and irregular structure render it, especially, difficult to degrade enzymatically (13). However, several species of fungus and bacteria are capable of lignin degradation (13–15). These organisms employ both laccase enzymes and a variety of heme-containing peroxidase enzymes, including Mn peroxidase. A major mechanism by which lignin-degrading enzymes work is through the production of soluble Mn(III) species via an oxidation reaction (15, 16).

Biogenic Mn oxides (BMO) and Mn-oxidizing bacteria (MnOB) are actively being investigated for their possible applications in bioremediation due to the highly reactive and sorptive nature of the BMO. BMO generated by E. coli cells genetically modified to express a non-blue laccase from Bacillus sp. GZB have been shown to degrade the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (17). BMO from the naturally Mn-oxidizing strain Pseudomonas sp. QJX-1 can degrade the herbicide glyphosate, and the bacteria can use the resulting breakdown products as a carbon, phosphate, or nitrogen source (18). Oxidation of pollutants is not the only mechanism of bioremediation by BMO. They have also been shown to remove arsenic from wastewater through precipitation of metal arsenates or adsorption on ferromanganese minerals (19). Breakdown of 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) by BMO was increased 15-fold by the presence of the MnOB Pseudomonas putida MnB1 (20). Thus, optimal bioremediation may require living MnOB, not just the oxides they produce, making it important to identify MnOB that can thrive under a variety of growth conditions.

One of the best studied MnOB is Pseudomonas putida GB-1. This gram-negative gamma-proteobacterium has been shown to possess three genes encoding Mn oxidase enzymes that each appear to oxidize Mn(II) to Mn(IV). Two of the oxidases belong to the multi-copper oxidase family of enzymes, encoded by the genes mnxG and mcoA (21). The third oxidase, MopA, is an animal heme peroxidase (22). Mn oxidation in this species is also dependent on a two-component regulatory pathway comprising two sensor kinases —MnxS1 and MnxS2—and a σ54-dependent response regulator MnxR (23). Regulation of Mn oxidation in this species appears to be linked to the motile vs biofilm lifestyle switch since the deletion of regulatory gene fleQ results in altered Mn oxidation (22, 24).

If a physiological function of Mn oxidation is the breakdown of recalcitrant organic carbon (ROC) for use as a food source, MnOB would be predicted to be found in areas with high concentrations of ROC, such as a compost pile. Sampling a compost pile on the campus of the University of Minnesota, Morris successfully resulted in the isolation of two MnOB strains, Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1 and MS-1. Both strains exhibit cold-tolerant growth and manganese oxidation down to 4°C. Genome sequence shows the two strains are very similar and have genes identified as important for Mn oxidation in the well-characterized MnOB Pseudomonas putida GB-1. We further demonstrate that the two strains can be genetically manipulated, illustrating the possibility of using these strains for bioremediation and studies of the evolution of Mn oxidation in the pseudomonads.

RESULTS

Isolation and identification of DSV-1 and MS-1

To test the prediction that Mn oxidation allows bacteria to degrade plant matter, samples were taken from a compost pile consisting of an approximate ratio of 75% plant material and 25% food waste (Troy Otsby, personal communication). Three samples were taken from the surface of the pile and at depths of ~15 cm and ~30 cm. From an initial set of ~10 Mn-oxidizing candidate species, four isolates were purified, and isolates MS-1 and DSV-1 were chosen for further characterization. At 24°C on solid media, both develop the brown colony color indicative of Mn oxidation (Fig. 1). The presence of Mn oxides was confirmed using leucoberbelin blue [LBB; data not shown, (25, 26)]. This oxidation behavior is similar to the well-characterized MnOB P. putida GB-1 (GB-1, Fig. 1). To tentatively identify the isolates, their 16S rRNA gene was amplified by colony PCR and sequenced. The resulting sequences were 100% identical to each other, and the best match in GenBank was to Pseudomonas psychrophila type strain E-3 (27) (NR_028619.1, 99% coverage, 99.66% identity).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Mn oxidation phenotype of new isolates compared to Pseudomonas putida GB-1. Strains were streaked onto Lept media and incubated at 24°C for 3 days. GB-1, Pseudomonas putida GB-1; MS-1, Pseudomonas sp. MS-1; DSV-1, Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1.

Phylogenetic tree of Pseudomonas genus

To further investigate the relationship of DSV-1 and MS-1 to other pseudomonads, multi-locus sequence alignment was performed to construct a phylogenetic tree comparing 88 species of the Pseudomonas genus and the new isolates (Table 1). The species chosen represent members of each of the major clades in the genus: the fluorescens, aeruginosa, and pertucinogena lineages (28). MS-1 and DSV-1 group with P. psychrophila and P. fragi in the P. fragi group within the fluorescens lineage (Fig. 2). This lineage not only contains other known MnOB, P. putida GB-1, P. entomophila L48, and P. fluorescens PfO-1, but also species not known to oxidize Mn, including P. syringae pv. tomato str DC3000 (21).

TABLE 1.

Accession numbers of strains used in phylogenetic tree

Species name Accession number Sequence type
Cellvibrio japonicus Ueda107 NC_010995 Complete genome
Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1 JAYMYG000000000 Complete genome
Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 JAYMYG000000000 Complete genome
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 NC_002516.2 Complete genome
Pseudomonas agarici NCPPB 2472 NC_002516.2 Complete genome
Pseudomonas alcaligenes NEB 585 NZ_CP014784 Complete genome
Pseudomonas alcaliphila JAB1 NZ_CP016162 Complete genome
Pseudomonas alkylphenolica KL28 NZ_CP009048 Complete genome
Pseudomonas anguilliseptica DSM 12111 NZ_FNSCO00000000 Complete genome
Pseudomonas antarctica PAMC 27494 NZ_CP015600 Complete genome
Pseudomonas asplenii ATCC 23835 NZ_LT629777 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_LT629777 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas avellanae R2leaf NZ_CP026562 Complete genome
Pseudomonas baetica LMG 25716 NZ_PHHE00000000 Shotgun sequence
Pseudomonas balearica DSM 6083 NZ_CP007511 Complete genome
Pseudomonas brassicacearum LBUM 300 NZ_CP012680 Complete genome
Pseudomonas brenneri NZ_LT629800 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas cannabina ICMP 2823 NZ_FNKU00000000 Shotgun sequence
Pseudomonas cedrina BS2981 NZ_LT629753 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas cerasi PL963 NZ_LT963395 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca DSM 19603 NZ_CP027746 Complete genome
Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens ChPhzTR39 NZ_CP027749 Complete genome
Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. chlororaphis DSM 50083 NZ_CP027712 Complete genome
Pseudomonas cichorii JBC1 NZ_CP007039 Complete genome
Pseudomonas citronellolis P3B5 NZ_CP014158 Complete genome
Pseudomonas corrugata RM1-1-4 NZ_CP014262 Complete genome
Pseudomonas cremoricolorata ND07 NZ_CP009455 Complete genome
Pseudomonas entomophila L48 NC_008027 Complete genome
Pseudomonas extremaustralis DSM 17835 NZ_LT629689 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas extremorientalis BS2774 LT629708 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1 NC_007492 Complete genome
Pseudomonas fragi DBC NZ_CP021986 Complete genome
Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis AS1 NZ_CP018319 Complete genome
Pseudomonas fulva SB1 NZ_CP023048 Complete genome
Pseudomonas furukawaii NZ_AP014862 Complete genome
Pseudomonas fuscovaginae LMG 2158 NZ_LT629972 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas granadensis LMG 27940 NZ_LT629778 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas guangdongensis CCTCC 2012022 NZ_LT629780 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas kilonensis ZKA7 NZ_QEKL00000000 Shotgun sequence
Pseudomonas knackmussii B13 NZ_HG322950 Complete genome
Pseudomonas koreensis P19E3 NZ_CP027477 Complete genome
Pseudomonas lactis SS101 NZ_CM001513 Shotgun sequence
Pseudomonas libanensis DMSP-1 NZ_CP034425 Complete genome
Pseudomonas lini BS3782 NZ_LT629746 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas litoralis 2SM5 NZ_LT629748 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas lundensis AU1044 CP017687 Complete genome
Pseudomonas lurida MYb11 NZ_CP023272 Complete genome
Pseudomonas mandelii JR-1 NZ_CP005960 Complete genome
Pseudomonas mediterranea DSM 16733 NZ_LT629790 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas mendocina ymp NC_009439 Complete genome
Pseudomonas mohnii DSM 18327 NZ_FNRV00000000 Shotgun sequence
Pseudomonas monteilii SB3078 NC_023075 Complete genome
Pseudomonas moraviensis BS3668 NZ_LT629788 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas mosselii BS011 NZ_CP023299 Complete genome
Pseudomonas mucidolens LMG 2223 NZ_LT629802 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas palleroniana MAB3 NZ_CP025494 Complete genome
Pseudomonas parafulva CRS01-1 NZ_CP009747 Complete genome
Pseudomonas plecoglossicida NyZ12 NZ_CP010359 Complete genome
Pseudomonas poae CAP-2018 CP034537 Complete genome
Pseudomonas pohangensis DSM 17875 NZ_LT629785 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas prosekii LMG 26867 NZ_LT629762 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas protegens UCT CP017964 Complete genome
Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes CECT 5344 NZ_HG916826 Complete genome
Pseudomonas psychrophila BS3667 LT629795 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas psychrotolerans CS51 NZ_CP021645 Complete genome
Pseudomonas putida F1 CP000712 Complete genome
Pseudomonas putida GB-1 NC_010322 Complete genome
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 NC_002947 Complete genome
Pseudomonas putida W619 NC_010501 Complete genome
Pseudomonas reinekei BS3776 NZ_LT629709 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas resinovorans NBRC 106553 NC_021499 Complete genome
Pseudomonas rhodesiae BS2777 NZ_LT629801 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas sabulinigri JCM 14963 NZ_LT629763 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas salegens CECT 8338 NZ_LT629787 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas silesiensis A3 NZ_CP014870 Complete genome
Pseudomonas simiae WCS417 NZ_CP007637 Complete genome
Pseudomonas soli SJ10 NZ_CP009365 Complete genome
Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501 NC_009434 Complete genome
Pseudomonas synxantha LMG 2190 NZ_LT629786 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000 AE016853 Complete genome
Pseudomonas taetrolens NCTC8067 NZ_LR134393 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas thivervalensis BS3779 NZ_LT629691 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas tolaasii 2192T NZ_CP020369 Complete genome
Pseudomonas trivialis IHBB745 NZ_CP011507 Complete genome
Pseudomonas umsongensis BS3657 NZ_LT629767 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas veronii R02 NZ_CP018420 Complete genome
Pseudomonas viridiflava CFBP 1590 NZ_LT855380 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas xanthomarina LMG 23572 NZ_LT629970 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas xinjiangensis NRRL B-51270 NZ_LT629736 Genome assembly
Pseudomonas yamanorum LBUM636 NZ_CP012400 Complete genome

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Phylogenetic tree of genus Pseudomonas. A total of 88 species of the genus Pseudomonas are represented by this tree, which uses a concatenated sequence of the 16S rRNA gene, rpoB, rpoD, and gyrB to construct proposed evolutionary relationships. Known MnOB are highlighted in red.

Complete genome sequence of MS-1 and DSV-1

Using a combination of Illumina and Nanopore sequencing approaches, complete genome sequences were generated for MS-1 (NCBI accession #: JAYMYF000000000) and DSV-1 (NCBI accession #: JAYMYG000000000). The MS-1 genome is smaller than DSV-1 (5.3 vs 5.7 Mb), with fewer predicted genes (Table 2). Genetic relatedness and species attribution can be determined using the genome-wide average nucleotide identity (gANI) and alignment fraction (AF) metrics (29–31). Using tools available at the Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes website at the Joint Genome Institute (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/) (32), it was determined that the DSV-1 and MS-1 pairwise gANI is 99.1% and 88.6% for AF (Table 3), supporting their identification as two strains within the same species. However, their best match to a P. psychrophila strain was P. psychrophila CF149 with an gANI of 92.6%–92.8% and an AF of 85.8%–87.4% (Table 5). Because a gANI of >95% is commonly used to assign strains to the same species, DSV-1 and MS-1 have diverged sufficiently from P. psychrophila to be considered members of a different species.

TABLE 2.

Comparison of GB-1, MS-1, and DSV-1 genomes

Organism GB-1 DSV-1 MS-1
No. of scaffolds 1 5 7
Bases 6,078,430 5,720,809 5,342,990
% GC 61.94 57.61 57.90
CDS 5,515 5,391 5,144
Percent w/ funct. prediction 76.1 77.6 80.5
Cold shock genes (COG1278, cspA) 6 6 6

TABLE 3.

Average nucleotide identity and alignment fraction

Genome 1 name, ID # Genome 2 name, ID # ANI1- >2 ANI2- >1 AF1- >2 AF2- >1
Pseudomonas DSV-1, 2986949986 Pseudomonas MS-1, 2986955527 99.1 99.1 88.6 88.6
Pseudomonas MS-1, 2986955527 P. psychrophila CF149, 2541047098 92.8 92.8 85.8 85.8
Pseudomonas DSV-1, 2986949986 P. psychrophila CF149, 2541047098 92.6 92.6 87.4 87.4

Identification of putative Mn oxidation genes

Using the genome sequences, it was possible to identify orthologs of Mn oxidation genes from the well-characterized MnOB P. putida GB-1. This organism encodes three separate Mn oxidase enzymes in its genome, mnxG, mcoA, and mopA (21, 22). MS-1 and DSV-1 both carry homologs to mnxG and mcoA but not mopA (Table 4). Three genes predicted to encode parts of a two-component regulatory pathway—mnxS1, mnxS2, and mnxR—are also essential for Mn oxidation in P. putida GB-1 (23). Each of these genes are present in both DSV-1 and MS-1 (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Putative Mn oxidation gene orthologs in DSV-1 and MS-1

P. putida GB-1 Mn oxidation gene Predicted function DSV-1 IMG gene ID # (% coverage/% identity) MS-1 IMG gene ID# (% coverage/% identity)
mnxG, 641547570 Mn oxidase enzyme (21) 2986952721 99%/79.2% 2986957664 99%/79.3%
641547571 40-Residue YVTN family beta-propeller repeat protein 2986952720 98%/59.7% 2986957665 98%/59.7%
641547572 Electron transport protein SCO1/SenC 2986952719 99%/60.4% 2986957666 99%/60.4%
641547573 Electron transport protein SCO1/SenC 2986952718 95%/64.15% 2986957667 95%/64.15%
641547574 Amino acid/amide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein, cytochrome c domain 2986952717 90%/50.6% 2986957668 90%/50.6%
641547575 SurA domain, porin chaperone 2986952716 98%/51.55% 2986957669 98%/51.55%
mcoA, 641547786 Mn oxidase enzyme (21) 2986952697 80%/74.1% 2986957688 80%/74.0%
641547787 Electron transport protein SCO1/SenC 2986952696 96%/59.6% 2986957689 96%/59.4%
641547788 Diguanylate cyclase/phosphodiesterase 2986950947 55%/40.1% 2986959393 55%/40.1%
641547789 ABC transporter, phosphonate, periplasmic substrate-binding protein 2986955028 90%/26.0% 2986958910 12%/39%
641547790 Phage integrase family 2986955374 96%/65.9% 2986958017 93%/63.6%
mopA, 641548469 Mn oxidase enzyme (22) 2986953309 2%/21.0% 2986957671 3%/23.5%
mnxS1, 641547642 Sensor kinase required for Mn oxidation (23) 2986952698 97%/61.2% 2986957687 97%/61.2%
mnxS2, 641547643 Sensor kinase required for Mn oxidation (23) 2986952695 98%/61.8% 2986957690 98%/61.8%
mnxR, 641547644 Response regulator required for Mn oxidation (23) 2986952694 100%/77.3% 2986957691 100%/77.3%

The spacing between the genes and their orientation on the P. putida GB-1 chromosome suggests that mnxG and mcoA represent the first gene of two operons, respectively, while mnxS1, mnxS2, and mnxR form a third putative operon (23) (Fig. 3). All six of the putative mnxG operon genes are found in both DSV-1 and MS-1, and they are found in the same orientation and organization on the chromosome (Table 4; Fig. 3). The mcoA putative operon contains five genes in P. putida GB-1 (Fig. 3); however, only mcoA and the gene immediately downstream, a predicted SCO1/SenC copper chaperone, are conserved in DSV-1 and MS-1 (Table 4; Fig. 3). The genome organization of mnxS1/S2/R is also somewhat conserved between GB-1, MS-1, and DSV-1, except that the mcoA SCO1/SenC gene pair of the putative mcoA operon is located in the space between mnxS1 and mnxS2 in both MS-1 and DSV-1 (Fig. 3).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Conservation of putative Mn oxidation operons. Arrows represent predicted genes. Numbers below the arrows represent the number of base pairs (bp) between predicted genes; numbers above the arrows are the length of the predicted protein product in amino acids (aa). Written within the arrows are the gene names and/or IMG gene ID# for the gene. Genes in the putative mnxG operon are red, genes in the mcoA operon are green, and those in the mnx two-component regulatory pathway are blue. GB-1, Pseudomonas putida GB-1; MS-1, Pseudomonas sp. MS-1; DSV-1, Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1.

Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 and DSV-1 growth at low temperature

Because of the close association of DSV-1 and MS-1 to P. psychrophila (Fig. 2), a psychrophilic species that can grow at temperatures as low as −1°C (27), we compared the ability of DSV-1 and MS-1 to grow at low temperature to that of the model MnOB P. putida GB-1. At 24°C, GB-1 grew somewhat faster than either strain (Table 5), although it reached a lower final optical density (Fig. 4). Growth slowed for all three strains at 14°C (Fig. 4), with GB-1 still doubling at a slightly faster rate than MS-1 or DSV-1 (Table 5). However, at 4°C, GB-1 grew very slowly, with roughly a 24-h doubling time (Fig. 4). Both MS-1 and DSV-1 grew detectably at this low temperature, with doubling times of 7.5 and 8.1 h, respectively (Table 5). Therefore, MS-1 and DSV-1 are capable of growth at low temperature but grow more slowly than at more moderate temperatures. During growth at 4°C, the optical density of the MS-1 culture dropped dramatically once the culture reached stationary phase. This could suggest a defect in survival at low temperature for this strain. However, the Mn-oxidizing MS-1 4°C cultures began to form aggregates once they reached stationary phase (data not shown), so much of this decrease in optical density may be due to this aggregation.

TABLE 5.

Growth rates and doubling times

4°C 14°C 24°C
Growth rate (h−1) Doubling time (h) Growth rate Doubling time Growth rate Doubling time
P. putida GB-1 0.04 ± 0.004 24.54 ± 2.14 0.51 ± 0.03 1.97 ± 0.12 1.31 ± 0.05 0.76 ± 0.03
Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1 0.12 ± 0.001 8.10 ± 0.09 0.44 ± 0.001 2.28 ± 0.004 0.95 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.01
Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 0.13 ± 0.01 7.51 ± 0.56 0.46 ± 0.01 2.19 ± 0.05 0.84 ± 0.06 1.20 ± 0.09

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Growth of P. putida GB-1, and P. psychrophila strains DSV-1 and MS-1 at various temperatures. Datapoints represent the average of three replicates; error bars are the standard deviation. (A) 24°C, (B) 14°C, and (C) 4°C. After 80 h of growth at 4°C, cellular aggregation in the MS-1 culture made it difficult to measure OD600.

Pseudomonas MS-1 and DSV-1 oxidize Mn at low temperature

The growth curve experiments were performed in the presence of reduced Mn, so it was possible to observe that all three strains accumulated Mn oxides during the course of the experiment (data not shown). To verify this observation, each strain was incubated on solid Lept media at 24°C, 14°C, and 4°C (Fig. 5). After 5 days, at 24°C, all three strains grew and oxidized Mn, as seen by the brown colony color. At 14°C, again all three strains oxidized Mn, with GB-1 producing a lighter brown color than MS-1 or DSV-1. At 4°C, both MS-1 and DSV-1 produced brown colonies, but GB-1 produced barely detectable growth. After 10 months, GB-1 had still failed to form detectable Mn oxides, while DSV-1 and MS-1 continued to grow and accumulate Mn oxides.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Effect of temperature on Mn(II) oxidation. Strains were incubated on Lept for 5 days at (A) 24°C, (B) 14°C, and (C) 4°C. (D) Plate C after 10 months at 4°C.

Genetic manipulation of DSV-1 and MS-1

The ability to genetically manipulate DSV-1 and MS-1 would make it possible to use these strains to investigate low-temperature Mn oxidation and generate strains optimized for bioremediation at low temperature. As a first step, we screened both strains for antibiotic sensitivity. DSV-1 and MS-1 are both resistant to ampicillin and penicillin but sensitive to gentamicin and kanamycin (data not shown). The selective medium Pseudomonas Isolation Agar (PIA, CRITERION, Hardy Diagnostics) is often used to isolate the Pseudomonas strains from environmental samples and during triparental mating (23). The basis of this selection is the presence of the broad-spectrum antimicrobial drug triclosan, which inhibits fatty acid synthesis. Pseudomonas spp. are naturally resistant to triclosan due to the presence of the FabV alternative fatty acid synthesis enzyme (33). However, neither DSV-1 nor MS-1 possesses a fabV homolog in their genomes, and neither strain can grow on PIA (data not shown).

Conjugation with E. coli is routinely used to introduce foreign DNA into P. putida GB-1 (22, 23). To demonstrate that conjugation can be used to move plasmids into DSV-1 and MS-1, we performed triparental conjugation to move the plasmids pBR322MCS-5 and pUCP22 (Table 7) into both strains. These plasmids both carry aacC1, the gentamicin-resistant marker gene; the successful transfer of the plasmid into DSV-1 and MS-1 was detected by the ability of the conjugants to grow on media containing gentamicin (data not shown). P. putida GB-1 can be made chemically competent and made to take up plasmids by heat shock transformation (23); a similar approach was successful with MS-1 but has not yet been tried with DSV-1.

To demonstrate the ability to generate mutations in the DSV-1 and MS-1 genomes, we conjugated into each strain the plasmid pRL27, which encodes the Tn5 transposon carrying a KanR-resistant gene marker (Table 7). This plasmid has an oriR6K origin of replication and therefore requires the presence of the pir gene on the chromosome in order to be maintained as a plasmid (34). Since DSV-1 and MS-1 lack the pir gene, the only way to obtain KanR colonies after conjugation is if the Tn5 transposon carrying KanR has transposed into the chromosome. The ability to isolate KanR colonies after conjugation into DSV-1 and MS-1 (data not shown) therefore demonstrates that these strains can be manipulated by insertion of Tn5 into the chromosome.

After successfully isolating kanamycin-resistant colonies, the colonies were screened for their Mn oxidation phenotype, and 13 mutant isolates were identified with altered Mn oxidation activity (11 in the DSV-1 strain and 2 in MS-1). Mapping the site of insertion revealed that several different genes had been targeted by transposition of Tn5 (Table 6). The oxidation phenotypes ranged from slight increase (KG271) to slight decrease (KG274) to no oxidation (KG272, 277, and 278; Fig. 6A). In the non-oxidizing strain KG278 (Fig. 6A), the transposon was inserted into the gene rpoN (Table 8), which encodes the alternative sigma factor σ54. To verify that the oxidation defect of KG278 is due to the rpoN::Tn5 mutation, complementation was performed using a plasmid carrying the P. putida GB-1 rpoN gene (pKG228, Table 7). Complementation was successful; pKG228 restored Mn oxidation to rpoN::Tn5 (Fig. 6B).

TABLE 6.

Tn5 mutations in DSV-1 and MS-1

Strain name Parent strain Gene disrupted (gene ID#) Predicted function Mn oxidation phenotype
KG266 DSV-1 Thiol-disulfide isomerase/thioredoxin; 2986951652 CCMa Decreased
KG267 DSV-1 Thiol-disulfide isomerase/thioredoxin; 2986951652 CCM Decreased
KG268 DSV-1 Thiol-disulfide isomerase/thioredoxin; 2986951652 CCM Decreased
KG269 DSV-1 Thiol-disulfide isomerase/thioredoxin; 2986951652 CCM Decreased
KG270 DSV-1 N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase, 2986950346 Arginine biosynthesis Slight decrease
KG275 DSV-1 Acetylglutamate kinase, 2986950012 Arginine biosynthesis Slight decrease
KG276 DSV-1 N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase, 2986950346 Arginine biosynthesis Slight decrease
KG271 DSV-1 23S rRNA gene; 2986950353 Translation Increased
KG272 DSV-1 tRNA uridine 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl modification enzyme, 2986954883 Translation No oxidation
KG273 DSV-1 23S rRNA gene; 2986950353 Translation Increased
KG274 DSV-1 Fumarate hydratase class I; 2986953570 TCA cycle Slight decrease
KG277 MS-1 Multi-component K+:H+ antiporter subunit A; 2986958496 Transport No oxidation
KG278 MS-1 RNA polymerase sigma-54 factor; 2986956421 Gene expression, sigma54 regulon No oxidation
a

Cytochrome c maturation.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Generation of strains with altered Mn(II) oxidation. (A) Wild-type and Tn5 mutant strains, 2 days at 24°C on Lept. (B) KG278 with empty vector (EV) and with plasmid-carrying rpoN (prpoN), 2 days at RT on Lept.

TABLE 7.

Plasmids and strains

Strain or plasmid Genotype, characteristics, or construction Antibiotic resistancea Source or reference
E. coli strains
 GT155 F¯ mcrA ∆(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) F80lacZ∆M15 ∆lacX74 recA1
endA1 ∆dcm, uidA(∆MluI)::pir-116, ∆sbcC-sbcD
N/A InvivoGen
 DH5α N/A
Pseudomonas strains
 P. putida GB-1 Manganese oxidizer, wild type AmpR (35)
 Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 AmpR This work
 Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1 AmpR This work
 KG266 Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1, Ga0589516_01_1717614_1718486::Tn5 AmpR, KanR This work
 KG274 Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1, Ga0589516_01_3718433_3719956::Tn5 AmpR, KanR This work
 KG278 Pseudomonas sp. MS-1, Ga0589517_01_982383_983852::Tn5 AmpR, KanR This work
Plasmids
 pRL27 Tn5 KanR (34)
 pRK2013 ColE1 replicon, mob RK2, tra RK2 KanR (36)
 pBBRMCS1-5 Broad host range expression vector GmR (37)
 pUCP22 Broad host range expression vector AmpR, GmR (38)
 pKG228 P. putida GB-1 rpoN gene cloned into pUCP22 AmpR, GmR This work
a

AmpR, ampicillin resistance; KanR, kanamycin resistance; GmR, gentamicin resistance.

DISCUSSION

In this work, novel MnOB were isolated from compost, supporting a possible role for Mn oxidation in the breakdown of complex organic molecules. Both MS-1 and DSV-1 were shown to grow and oxidize Mn at low temperature. A complete genome sequence and phylogenetic characterization showed these strains to be closely related to Pseudomonas psychrophila but genetically distinct. Therefore, they have been named Pseudomonas sp. DSV-1 and MS-1. Both strains are amenable to genetic manipulation and carry, in their genomes, genes homologous to those previously identified as important for Mn oxidation in P. putida GB-1.

Low-temperature growth

DSV-1 and MS-1 both grow well at 4°C but grow faster at 24°C (Fig. 4; Table 7). Psychrophilic organisms are commonly defined as those that grow best at temperatures below 20°C and thus are confined to environments that are continuously cold. Conversely, psychrotrophic or psychrotolerant organisms grow best at 20°C or above but grow well at temperatures below 20°C (39). Given this definition, DSV-1 and MS-1 are best described as psychrotolerant. Cold-tolerant species have previously been identified in the genus Pseudomonas from environments as diverse as Antarctic sea ice and food spoilage (40, 41). For example, Pseudomonas psychrophila HA-4 was isolated by its ability to degrade the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole at low temperature (42), and Pseudomonas fragi strains were isolated from the leaves of cold-adapted plants (43). MS-1 and DSV-1 are closely related to P. fragi and P. psychrophila (Fig. 2). Thus, the cold tolerance of Pseudomonas strains isolated from a compost pile located outside in Minnesota in winter was not unexpected.

Low-temperature Mn oxidation

While MnOB have generally been characterized as mesophiles (35, 44), Mn oxidation at low temperature has been observed before. Brevibacillus brevi MO1 has been shown to oxidize Mn at 4°C but not to the same extent as it does at 37°C (45). Arthrobacter sp. NI-2 normally oxidizes Mn at 30°C; a mutation in this strain allows it to oxidize at 10°C (46). The dormant spores of Bacillus sp. SG-1 are capable of producing Mn oxides over a very wide range of temperatures, from 0°C to 80°C (47). Pseudomonas sp. MOB-449 grows well and exhibits its maximum Mn oxidation capacity at 18°C (48). At this low temperature, Mn stimulates biofilm growth and expression of the c-type cytochrome biosynthesis enzyme CcmE, leading to the proposal that the Mn oxidation supplements the cell’s energy needs (49). Thus, while P. psychrophila DSV-1 and MS-1 are not the only MnOB capable of low-temperature Mn oxidation identified so far, they are the first characterized that actively grow and robustly oxidize at temperatures as low as 4°C.

Conservation of Mn oxidation mechanism

Many of the genes identified as playing a role in Mn oxidation in P. putida GB-1 are also present in DSV-1 and MS-1. Each has orthologs to the Mn oxidase genes mnxG and mcoA but lack clear orthologs to mopA (Table 4). This suggests that Mn oxidation in these strains depends on the multi-copper oxidases MnxG and McoA but not the heme peroxidase MopA. DSV-1 and MS-1 also carry orthologs to the Mnx two-component regulatory pathway comprising MnxS1, MnxS2, and MnxR. MnxR in P. putida GB-1 is required for Mn oxidation and is predicted to be a σ54-dependent transcription factor, based on its domain composition (23). The MnxR orthologs in MS-1 and DSV-1 are also predicted to contain σ54 interaction domains. This suggests that the expression of Mn oxidation genes is driven by RNA polymerase containing σ54 in all three strains. Supporting this conclusion, a Tn5 insertion in the predicted rpoN gene of MS-1 resulted in a strain completely defective for Mn oxidation when assayed on solid media (Fig. 6) and in liquid culture (data not shown). This oxidation defect could be complemented with the GB-1 rpoN gene, reinforcing the conclusion that Mn oxidation in this strain is σ54 dependent.

Previous work has shown that Mn oxidation in P. putida GB-1 can be disrupted by Tn5 insertions in genes encoding components of the TCA cycle, including the succinate dehydrogenase complex (sdhABC), lipoate acetyltransferase (aceA), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (icd) (50). Insertion of Tn5 into the fumarate hydratase class I gene of DSV-1 resulted in moderately decreased Mn oxidation (KG274, Fig. 6); fumarate hydratase catalyzes the conversion of fumarate to malate in the TCA cycle. KG266–269 all have Tn5 inserted in a predicted thiol-disulfide isomerase (Table 8). In Bradyrhizobium japonicum, a similar protein called TlpA is involved in cytochrome c oxidase maturation (51). In DSV-1, the gene is in a putative operon between dsbD and dsbG genes, raising the possibility of polar effects on these neighboring genes. In Shewanella oneidensis, DsbD facilitates the transfer of electrons to the protein CcmG during the cytochrome c maturation (CCM) process (52). In P. putida MnB1, the CCM genes ccmA, E, and F have previously been identified as playing a role in Mn oxidation (50), and CcmE has been implicated in low-temperature Mn oxidation in Pseudomonas sp. MOB-449 (49). Thus, the function and regulation of Mn oxidation in the new isolates are likely similar to that in other Mn-oxidizing pseudomonads.

TABLE 8.

Primer list

Name Sequence Reference
8F 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ (53)
519R 5′-GWATTACCGCGGCKGCTG-3′ (54)
tpnRL17-1 AACAAGCCAGGGATGTAACG (34)
tpnRL13-2 CAGCAACACCTTCTTCACGA (34)
ARB1 GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACNNNNNNNNNNTACNG (55)
ARB2 GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACNNNNNNNNNNGATAT (55)
ARB3 GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACNNNNNNNNNNACGCC (55)
ARB4 GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC (55)
Tnp5IR-2R GGTTGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG (56)
rpoN_1-F CGCGAATTCGCGAACAAGGTATTAAGCCC, incorporates an EcoRI recognition site upstream of rpoN This work
rpoN_2-R CGCTCTAGACGTGCATAAAGAAGCAGGTC, incorporates an XbaI recognition site downstream of rpoN This work

Low-temperature bioremediation

There are many potential applications for MnOB and biogenic Mn oxides in bioremediation. Cold-tolerant bacteria and their enzymes are also valuable tools for bioremediation and other industrial applications (42, 57, 58). Therefore, Pseudomonas ssp. MS-1 and DSV-1 expand the conditions under which MnOB can be used for bioremediation due to their ability to form Mn oxides at low temperature. Our preliminary results suggest the two strains differ in the effect of temperature on their ability to accumulate oxidized Mn. As judged by the intensity of brown oxides formed, MS-1 robustly formed Mn oxides at all three temperatures tested, while DSV-1 best formed oxides at the intermediate temperature of 14°C (Fig. 5). MS-1 also tolerates growth at temperatures above 24°C better than DSV-1 (data not shown), which suggests this strain will be the better target for bioremediation applications.

At cold temperatures, bacteria experience stress due to decreased membrane fluidity, decreased enzyme activity, altered redox state, and increased stability of RNA and DNA structures, which interfere with replication and gene expression (59–61). The MS-1 and DSV-1 genomes are very similar to one another (Tables 2 and 3); comparing these genomes may make it possible to determine the genetic basis for their differences in oxidation and temperature sensitivity phenotypes. Preliminary characterization of cold shock genes in GB-1, DSV-1, and MS-1 (Table 2 and data not shown) failed to reveal a genetic basis for the cold tolerance of DSV-1 and MS-1 since all three genomes possess six putative cold shock protein genes (cspA). Both strains can be made to take up foreign DNA by conjugation and transformation; they can express foreign genes from plasmids and can have their genomes mutated with a transposon. The apparent conservation of Mn oxidation and its regulation between the new isolates and the well-characterized MnOB P. putida GB-1 will guide future efforts to generate cold-tolerant strains optimized for Mn oxidation under various conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Media and culture conditions

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 7. Pseudomonas strains were grown in LB or Lept liquid and solid media made according to the procedure of reference (25). Strains were grown at 24°C, 14°C, or 4°C. Escherichia coli strains were grown in LB medium at 37°C. The following concentrations of antibiotics were used: ampicillin (100 µg/mL), gentamicin (50 µg/mL), and kanamycin (30 µg/mL). For oxidation assays, MnCl2 was added to Lept medium at a final concentration of 100 µM. Phosphate-buffered saline was made according to standard protocols (62).

Sample collection

Samples for cultivation were collected from a compost pile on the University of Minnesota, Morris campus that is composed of a 3:1 ratio of plant material to food waste (Ostby, Personal Communication). Samples were taken in February 2019 using sterile, plastic 50 mL tubes. The tubes were opened and immediately used to scoop material from the compost surface, ~15 cm, or ~30 cm below the surface. After collection, the tubes were sealed, immediately transported back to the lab, and stored at 4°C. Furthermore, 1 g of sample was incubated in PBS pH 7.3 for 5 min at RT, with shaking. The PBS/compost mixture was allowed to settle 10–15 min, and then 100 µL of the supernatant was spread onto Lept plates. After incubation at RT for 7 days, thousands of colonies were visible, with a subset of brown, putative Mn-oxidizing colonies. Mn oxidation was confirmed using a leucoberbelin blue spot test (25). LBB-positive colonies were selected and subcultured onto fresh Lept lates. After several rounds of re-streaking, DSV-1 and MS-1 were shown to be pure via microscopic observation.

Identification of isolates by 16S rRNA sequencing

To obtain 16S amplicons from our bacterial sample, colony PCR was run using iProof High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase using the following concentrations of reagents: 200 µM dNTP mix, 1 µM forward primer, 1 µM reverse primer, 0.5 U of iProof High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase per 50 µL reaction, 10 µL of 5× iProof HF Buffer per 50 µL reaction, and 1 µL of overnight culture in NB broth as the DNA template source. Primers 8F and 519R (Table 8) were used to generate an ~500 bp amplicon. Reaction conditions were initial denaturation at 98°C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles of 98°C for 30 s, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, followed by 72°C for 5 min.

PCR amplicons were purified using DNA Clean & Concentrator-5 according to manufacturer’s instructions (Zymo Research, Irvine CA). The concentration of DNA samples was determined using a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer from manufacturer Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Furthermore, 50 ng of 500 bp length sequences and 200 ng of 1,500 bp sequences were added to new tubes for sequencing by the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (http://genomics.umn.edu/). Also included in the samples were 6.4 pmol of the appropriate primers (Table 2). Short amplicons were sequenced using 8F and 519R, while the long amplicons were sequenced with 8F, 519R, 1492R, 533F, and CDR (Table 2).

Amplicons of the 16S SSU gene were conjoined using GeneStudio (https://sourceforge.net/projects/genestudio/) to produce a consensus sequence of 1,467 bp. This consensus sequence was then used to query the 16S ribosomal RNA (bacteria and archaea) database using BLASTN (63, 64).

DNA extraction and genome sequencing

Cultures were grown on solid R2A medium, and a single colony was transferred to 10 mL of tryptic soy broth and grown for 48 h with shaking. Five milliliters of each culture were then centrifuged for 10 min at 2,000 × g in a swinging bucket rotor, and the supernatant was removed. The cell pellets were then resuspended in 0.5 mL of sterile PBS pH 7.4 (Gibco-Thermo Fisher, Waltham MA), and DNA was extracted using the QIAamp UCP Pathogen Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown MD) following the standard protocol with the final elution in molecular biology grade water. Purified DNA was quantified using a Qubit 4 fluorometer using dsDNA HS Assay (Invitrogen-Thermo Fisher, Waltham MA). Illumina sequencing was performed using the Nextera DNA Flex Library prep following the standard protocol and sequenced with a 600-cycle MiSeq v3 Reagent Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Long-read sequencing was performed using a 1D2 R9.2 Sequencing Kit on an Oxford Nanopore Minion sequencer (Oxford Nanopore, New York, NY). Read coverage was approximately 120× for Illumina sequencing and 30× for Nanopore sequencing. Illumina reads were trimmed for quality, and adapters were removed using Trimmomatic V0.39 (65). Illumina and Nanopore reads were then used to assemble the genomes using the Unicycler assembly pipeline V0.4.8 (66) with Spades V3.13.0 (67).

Generation of Pseudomonas phylogenetic tree

Assembled genomes for 88 Pseudomonas species were downloaded from NCBI, and 4 housekeeping genes (16S rRNA, rpoB, rpoD, and gyrB) were extracted from each assembled genome [as in reference (28)]. These four genes were concatenated and aligned with Cellvibrio japonicus as an outgroup using default parameters in MAFFT [version 7; (68)]. This alignment was used to build a phylogenetic tree with RAxML [v. 8.2.11; (69)]. The rapid bootstrapping and search for best scoring ML tree approach was used with 1,000 replicates, the input was partitioned by each gene, and a GTR Gamma nucleotide model was implemented. All of the above took place within the Geneious Prime (v. 2019.1.1) interface.

Growth curves, growth rate, and doubling times

Growth rates and doubling times were calculated using spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 600 nm. Cultures of GB-1, DSV-1, and MS-1 were grown overnight in 5 mL of Lept media with continuous agitation at 240 rpm at a temperature of 24°C. Subcultures of each strain were prepared in triplicate by diluting the overnight cultures 100-fold into 50 mL of Lept media. These subcultures were then grown at 24°C, 14°C, and 4°C with continuous agitation at 240 rpm. Furthermore, 1 mL samples were taken periodically to determine optical density using a spectrophotometer.

Transposon mutagenesis

The plasmid carrying the transposon Tn5, pRL27, was moved into DSV-1 and MS-1 by triparental conjugation (23) and transconjugants selected by plating on LB containing 30 µg/mL kanamycin and 100 µg/mL ampicillin. Colonies were replica plated onto solid Lept media to screen for variations in the manganese oxidation phenotype. Selected MS-1 and DSV-1 mutants were streaked for single colonies on Lept media and compared to wild type to confirm the variation in their manganese-oxidizing capabilities.

Mapping site of transposon insertion

Some Tn5 insertion sites were mapped according to the protocol of reference (24) with the following exceptions. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Five micrograms of purified gDNA were digested with BamHI in a 50 µL reaction overnight at 37°C. The digested DNA was ethanol precipitated, and 100 ng was ligated using T4 DNA ligase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) in a 20 µL reaction overnight at room temperature. The ligation reactions were then transformed into E. coli GT115 commercially made competent cells (Invivogen CHEMICOMP GT115, Fisher Scientific). LB agar with Km was used to select E. coli cells transformed with the plasmid containing Tn5 and the BamHI fragment of the genome. Plasmids were purified from KmR colonies using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen,Valencia, CA). Purified plasmids were sent to be sequenced at Functional Biosciences (https://functionalbio.com/) using primers tpnRL17-1 and tpnRL13-2 (Table 2). The sequenced genes were identified using a BLAST search against the relevant genome database on the Integrated Microbial Genomes website (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/) (70).

The remaining Tn5 insertion sites were mapped using an arbitrary PCR approach (55). Genomic DNA was prepared as above. Three reactions were performed for each mutant, each using tpnRL17-1 as the forward primer, and ARB1, ARB2, or ARB3 as the reverse primer (Table 2). Furthermore, 1 µL of genomic DNA was used as template, 1× Promega GoTaqG2 Hot Start Green Master Mix, and 0.8 µM final concentration primers in total volume of 25 µL. PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 95°C 5 min, 6 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 30°C 30 s, 72°C 2 min followed by 30 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 45°C 30 s, 72°C 2 min followed by 72°C 5 min and then stored at 4°C. One microliter of this reaction was used as template in a second PCR with ARB4 and tnp5IR-2R as the primers, 0.8 µM final concentration, and 1× Promega GoTaq G2 Hot Start Green Master Mix in a total volume of 30 µL. PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 95°C 5 min, 30 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 55°C 30 s, 72°C 2 min followed by 72°C 5 min and then stored at 4°C. Reactions were separated on a 1% low melt agarose gel; the prominent band from each reaction was excised using a razor blade and stored at 4°C. One microliter of liquid from the excised band was used as template for a third round of PCR with the same primers and conditions as the second PCR. The DNA from both the excised gel band and the third PCR was cleaned using the GeneJET Gel Extraction and DNA Cleanup Micro Kit (ThermoScientific) and was sent to Functional Biosciences (https://functionalbio.com/) to be sequenced using primer Tnp5IR-2R (Table 2).

Construction of the rpoN plasmid

The rpoN gene was PCR amplified from Pseudomonas putida GB-1 using primers rpoN_1 F and rpoN_2 R (Table 2), with a high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Phusion HotStart high-fidelity DNA polymerase). The resulting PCR product was cloned into pJET1.2/blunt (CloneJet PCR Cloning Kit; Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD). The genes were subsequently subcloned into the broad host-range plasmid pUCP22 (Table 1) using the EcoRI and XbaI restriction enzyme recognition sites engineered into the amplification primers, and the presence of the insert in the resulting plasmid was confirmed by restriction digest. The genes inserted into pUCP22 are expressed constitutively from the plasmid-borne promoter Plac.

Transformation of Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 and derivatives

Pseudomonas sp. MS-1 and the MS-1 rpoN::Tn5 mutant were made competent as follows. Bacteria were grown overnight in LB and subsequently diluted 25-fold into fresh LB and grown at room temperature for 4 h. Furthermore, 2 mL of cells was pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 1 min and then washed with 1 mL of ice cold 0.1 M CaCl2. Cells were then pelleted and resuspended in 1 mL ice cold 0.1M CaCl2 and incubated on ice for 30 min. Finally, cells were pelleted and resuspended in 100 µL ice cold CaCl2. Transformation was performed by adding 2 µL plasmid to the cells and incubating on ice for 30 min. Next cells were exposed to heat shock for 90 s at 37°C and then returned to ice for 2 min. Then, 400 µL SOC medium was added to each transformation, which were then incubated at room temperature with shaking for 1 h. Finally, the entire transformation was plated onto LBGm plates and incubated at room temperature.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Oscar Li for assistance mapping the sites of Tn5 insertion, Taylor Miller for her assistance in sample handling, Troy Ostby for access to the University of Minnesota compost pile, and Mary Stewart for being the namesake of MS-1.

Contributor Information

Kati Geszvain, Email: kgeszvain@csuchico.edu.

John R. Spear, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA

REFERENCES

  • 1. Geszvain K, Butterfield C, Davis RE, Madison AS, Lee SW, Parker DL, Soldatova A, Spiro TG, Luther GW, Tebo BM. 2012. The molecular biogeochemistry of manganese(II) oxidation. Biochem Soc Trans 40:1244–1248. doi: 10.1042/BST20120229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hansel CM, Zeiner CA, Santelli CM, Webb SM. 2012. Mn(II) oxidation by an ascomycete fungus is linked to superoxide production during asexual reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12621–12625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203885109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schlosser D, Höfer C. 2002. Laccase-catalyzed oxidation of Mn(2+) in the presence of natural Mn(3+) chelators as a novel source of extracellular H(2)O(2) production and its impact on manganese peroxidase. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3514–3521. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3514-3521.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Höfer C, Schlosser D. 1999. Novel enzymatic oxidation of Mn2+ to Mn3+ catalyzed by a fungal laccase. FEBS Lett 451:186–190. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00566-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tebo BM, Geszvain K, Lee S-W. 2010. The molecular geomicrobiology of bacterial manganese(II) oxidation, p 285–308. In Barton LL, Mandl M, Loy A (ed), Geomicrobiology: Molecular and environmental perspective. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sujith PP, Bharathi PAL. 2011. Manganese Oxidation by Bacteria: Biogeochemical Aspects, p 49–76. In Müller WEG (ed), Molecular biomineralization: aquatic organisms forming extraordinary materials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Banh A, Chavez V, Doi J, Nguyen A, Hernandez S, Ha V, Jimenez P, Espinoza F, Johnson HA. 2013. Manganese (Mn) oxidation increases intracellular Mn in Pseudomonas putida GB-1. PLoS One 8:e77835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhou H, Fu C. 2020. Manganese-oxidizing microbes and biogenic manganese oxides: characterization, Mn(II) oxidation mechanism and environmental relevance. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 19:489–507. doi: 10.1007/s11157-020-09541-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Estes ER, Andeer PF, Nordlund D, Wankel SD, Hansel CM. 2017. Biogenic manganese oxides as reservoirs of organic carbon and proteins in terrestrial and marine environments. Geobiology 15:158–172. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yu H, Leadbetter JR. 2020. Bacterial chemolithoautotrophy via manganese oxidation. Nature New Biol 583:453–458. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2468-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Keiluweit M, Nico P, Harmon ME, Mao J, Pett-Ridge J, Kleber M. 2015. Long-term litter decomposition controlled by manganese redox cycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E5253–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508945112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Stendahl J, Berg B, Lindahl BD. 2017. Manganese availability is negatively associated with carbon storage in northern coniferous forest humus layers. Sci Rep 7:15487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15801-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Datta R, Kelkar A, Baraniya D, Molaei A, Moulick A, Meena RS, Formanek P. 2017. Enzymatic degradation of lignin in soil: a review. Sustainability 9:1163. doi: 10.3390/su9071163 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Brown ME, Chang MCY. 2014. Exploring bacterial lignin degradation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 19:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. de Gonzalo G, Colpa DI, Habib MHM, Fraaije MW. 2016. Bacterial enzymes involved in lignin degradation. J Biotechnol 236:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Atiwesh G, Parrish CC, Banoub J, Le T-AT. 2022. Lignin degradation by microorganisms: a review. Biotechnol Prog 38:e3226. doi: 10.1002/btpr.3226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Das R, Yao P, Yin H, Liang Z, Li G, An T. 2023. BPA degradation using biogenic manganese oxides produced by an engineered Escherichia coli with a non-blue laccase from Bacillus sp. GZB. Chemosphere 326:138407. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yu J, Jin B, Ji Q, Wang H. 2023. Detoxification and metabolism of glyphosate by a Pseudomonas sp. via biogenic manganese oxidation. J Hazard Mater 448:130902. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. He Z, Li Z, Zhang Q, Wei Z, Duo J, Pan X. 2019. Simultaneous remediation of As(III) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) in soil by a manganese-oxidizing bacterium and its mechanisms. Chemosphere 220:837–844. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tran TN, Kim D-G, Ko S-O. 2018. Synergistic effects of biogenic manganese oxide and Mn(II)-oxidizing bacterium Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1 on the degradation of 17 α-ethinylestradiol. J Hazard Mater 344:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Geszvain K, McCarthy JK, Tebo BM. 2013. Elimination of manganese(II,III) oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1 by a double knockout of two putative multicopper oxidase genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:357–366. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01850-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Geszvain K, Smesrud L, Tebo BM. 2016. Identification of a third Mn(II) oxidase enzyme in Pseudomonas putida GB-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3774–3782. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00046-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Geszvain K, Tebo BM. 2010. Identification of a two-component regulatory pathway essential for Mn(II) oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1224–1231. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02473-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Geszvain K, Yamaguchi A, Maybee J, Tebo BM. 2011. Mn(II) oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1 is influenced by flagella synthesis and surface substrate. Arch Microbiol 193:605–614. doi: 10.1007/s00203-011-0702-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Boogerd FC, de Vrind JP. 1987. Manganese oxidation by leptothrix discophora. J Bacteriol 169:489–494. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.2.489-494.1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tebo B, Clement BG, Dick GJ. 2007. Biotransformations of manganese, p 1316–1316. In Hurst CJ, Crawford RL, Garland JL, Lipson DA, Mills AL, Stetzenbach LD (ed), Manual of environmental microbiology, 3rd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yumoto I, Kusano T, Shingyo T, Nodasaka Y, Matsuyama H, Okuyama H. 2001. Assignment of Pseudomonas sp. strain E-3 to Pseudomonas psychrophila sp. nov., a new facultatively psychrophilic bacterium. Extremophiles 5:343–349. doi: 10.1007/s007920100199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena M-H, Velázquez E. 2018. The current status on the taxonomy of Pseudomonas revisited: an update. Infect Genet Evol 57:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. 2005. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2567–2572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, Pati A. 2015. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 43:6761–6771. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chen I-M, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Hajek P, Ritter S, Varghese N, Seshadri R, Roux S, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2021. The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.6.0: new tools and advanced capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D751–D763. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhu L, Lin J, Ma J, Cronan JE, Wang H. 2010. Triclosan resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 is due to FabV, a triclosan-resistant enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:689–698. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01152-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Larsen RA, Wilson MM, Guss AM, Metcalf WW. 2002. Genetic analysis of pigment biosynthesis in Xanthobacter autotrophicus Py2 using a new, highly efficient transposon mutagenesis system that is functional in a wide variety of bacteria. Arch Microbiol 178:193–201. doi: 10.1007/s00203-002-0442-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Okazaki M, Sugita T, Shimizu M, Ohode Y, Iwamoto K, de Vrind-de Jong EW, de Vrind JP, Corstjens PL. 1997. Partial purification and characterization of manganese-oxidizing factors of Pseudomonas fluorescens GB-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4793–4799. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.12.4793-4799.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Figurski DH, Helinski DR. 1979. Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1648–1652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kovach ME, Elzer PH, Hill DS, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop RM 2nd, Peterson KM. 1995. Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene 166:175–176. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00584-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. West SE, Schweizer HP, Dall C, Sample AK, Runyen-Janecky LJ. 1994. Construction of improved Escherichia-Pseudomonas shuttle vectors derived from pUC18/19 and sequence of the region required for their replication in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 148:81–86. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90237-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gounot A-M. 1986. Psychrophilic and psychrotrophic microorganisms. Experientia 42:1192–1197. doi: 10.1007/BF01946390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bowman JP, McCammon SA, Brown MV, Nichols DS, McMeekin TA. 1997. Diversity and association of psychrophilic bacteria in Antarctic sea ice. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3068–3078. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.8.3068-3078.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhang Y, Wei J, Yuan Y, Yue T. 2019. Diversity and characterization of spoilage-associated psychrotrophs in food in cold chain. Int J Food Microbiol 290:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.09.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jiang B, Li A, Cui D, Cai R, Ma F, Wang Y. 2014. Biodegradation and metabolic pathway of sulfamethoxazole by Pseudomonas psychrophila HA-4, a newly isolated cold-adapted sulfamethoxazole-degrading bacterium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4671–4681. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5488-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Tiryaki D, Aydın İ, Atıcı Ö. 2019. Psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from the leaf apoplast of cold-adapted wild plants improve the cold resistance of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under low temperature. Cryobiology 86:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Jung WK, Schweisfurth R. 1979. Manganese oxidation by an intracellular protein of a Pseudomonas species. J of Basic Microbiology 19:107–115. doi: 10.1002/jobm.19790190206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zhao X, Wang X, Liu B, Xie G, Xing D. 2018. Characterization of manganese oxidation by Brevibacillus at different ecological conditions. Chemosphere 205:553–558. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Nakayama H, Shin Y, Sumita T, Urata K, Ikegami Y, Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan, Faculty of Environmental Science, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan, Organization for Marine Science and Technology, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan, Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan, Faculty of Environmental Science, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan, Institute of Ocean Energy, Saga University, Saga 840-8520, Japan, Institute of Ocean Energy, Saga University, Saga 840-8520, Japan . 2019. Characterization of manganese oxide-biomineralization by the psychrophilic marine bacterium, Arthrobacter sp. Strain NI-2 and its spontaneous mutant strain NI-2’. EnNRJ 17:68–77. doi: 10.32526/ennrj.17.4.2019.32 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mandernack KW, Post J, Tebo BM. 1995. Manganese mineral formation by bacterial spores of the marine Bacillus, strain SG-1: evidence for the direct oxidation of Mn(II) to Mn(IV). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:4393–4408. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00298-E [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Piazza A, Ciancio Casalini L, Pacini VA, Sanguinetti G, Ottado J, Gottig N. 2019. Environmental bacteria involved in manganese(II) oxidation and removal from groundwater. Front Microbiol 10:119. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ciancio Casalini L, Piazza A, Masotti F, Garavaglia BS, Ottado J, Gottig N. 2022. Manganese oxidation counteracts the deleterious effect of low temperatures on biofilm formation in Pseudomonas sp. MOB-449. Front Mol Biosci 9:1015582. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1015582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Caspi R, Tebo BM, Haygood MG. 1998. C-type cytochromes and manganese oxidation in Pseudomonas putida MnB1. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3549–3555. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.10.3549-3555.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Abicht HK, Schärer MA, Quade N, Ledermann R, Mohorko E, Capitani G, Hennecke H, Glockshuber R. 2014. How periplasmic thioredoxin TlpA reduces bacterial copper chaperone ScoI and cytochrome oxidase subunit II (CoxB) prior to metallation. J Biol Chem 289:32431–32444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.607127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Guo K, Feng X, Sun W, Han S, Wu S, Gao H. 2022. NapB restores cytochrome c biosynthesis in bacterial dsbD-deficient mutants. Commun Biol 5:87. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03034-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VP, Palmer JD. 1999. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:327–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04612.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML, Pace NR. 1985. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:6955–6959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Knobloch J-M, Nedelmann M, Kiel K, Bartscht K, Horstkotte MA, Dobinsky S, Rohde H, Mack D. 2003. Establishment of an arbitrary PCR for rapid identification of Tn917 insertion sites in Staphylococcus epidermidis: characterization of biofilm-negative and nonmucoid mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5812–5818. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.5812-5818.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Montgomery KS. 2020. Mutation mapping to demystify sheath production in leptothrix cholodnii SP-6. PhD Thesis. California State University, Chico. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Cagide C, Marizcurrena JJ, Vallés D, Alvarez B, Castro-Sowinski S. 2023. A bacterial cold-active dye-decolorizing peroxidase from an Antarctic Pseudomonas strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107:1707–1724. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12405-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wang Y, Chen X, Wu B, Ma T, Jiang H, Mi Y, Jiang C, Zang H, Zhao X, Li C. 2022. Potential and mechanism for bioremediation of papermaking black liquor by a psychrotrophic lignin-degrading bacterium, Arthrobacter sp. C2. J Hazard Mater 439:129534. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Phukon LC, Chourasia R, Padhi S, Abedin MM, Godan TK, Parameswaran B, Singh SP, Rai AK. 2022. Cold-adaptive traits identified by comparative genomic analysis of a lipase-producing Pseudomonas sp. HS6 isolated from snow-covered soil of Sikkim Himalaya and molecular simulation of lipase for wide substrate specificity. Curr Genet 68:375–391. doi: 10.1007/s00294-022-01241-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Frank S, Schmidt F, Klockgether J, Davenport CF, Gesell Salazar M, Völker U, Tümmler B. 2011. Functional genomics of the initial phase of cold adaptation of Pseudomonas putida KT2440. FEMS Microbiol Lett 318:47–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02237.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Reva ON, Weinel C, Weinel M, Böhm K, Stjepandic D, Hoheisel JD, Tümmler B. 2006. Functional genomics of stress response in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J Bacteriol 188:4079–4092. doi: 10.1128/JB.00101-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. . Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Available from: http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/content/2006/1/pdb.rec8247. Retrieved 18 Jan 2020
  • 63. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. . Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702911/?report=classic. Retrieved 18 Jan 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Markowitz VM, Chen I-M, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Jacob B, Huang J, Williams P, Huntemann M, Anderson I, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2012. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D115–D122. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES