The gluteal region has emerged as a prominent area of interest in plastic surgery in recent years, as evidenced by trends in body contouring procedures. Gluteoplasty and the Brazilian butt lift are increasingly sought-after and performed procedures. The morphological characteristics that define an aesthetically pleasing female buttock are numerous and extend beyond the simple ideal waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7.1 The shape, volume, and projection of the buttocks are among the factors that contribute harmoniously to defining aesthetically pleasing buttocks.2 However, when describing the ideal of female buttock beauty, the generic term “curves” or, at most, sections (or arcs) of circumference are typically used. According to this perspective, the points of greatest lateral and inferior prominence generally align with the precise midpoint of the respective circumference arcs (lateral and inferior) used to characterize the ideal female gluteal profile.
The golden section, also known as the golden ratio, is a mathematical proportion approximately equal to 1.618, which is widely regarded as aesthetically pleasing to the human eye. It is derived by dividing a line into two segments, where the longer segment (a) divided by the shorter segment (b) equals the sum of both segments (a + b) divided by the longer segment (a), resulting in 1:1.618.3 A golden rectangle is a rectangle whose side lengths are in the golden ratio, expressed as (a + b)/a = 1.618. Golden rectangles exhibit a unique form of self-similarity and visual appeal. Within golden rectangles, Fibonacci (golden) spirals are inscribed, progressively decreasing in size. The spiral is formed by progressively nesting smaller golden rectangles within a larger golden rectangle. Interestingly, we observed that the perimeter of a golden spiral closely resembles what is commonly considered an attractive female buttock shape, both when standing (Fig. 1) and sitting (Fig. 2). This apparent correlation helps elucidate why certain buttock shapes are deemed attractive whereas others are not. Furthermore, in our opinion, this geometric analysis can offer practical insights for achieving optimal results in buttock cosmetic surgery. According to the golden spiral, the most prominent lateral point (A) is positioned inferiorly compared with the commonly assumed location (ie, approximately in the middle of the gluteal curvature) (Figs. 1 and 2). Similarly, the point of greatest inferior projection (B), located in the subgluteal groove, is noticeably displaced more medially than typically thought (ie, around the midline) (Figs. 1 and 2). This contrasts with the earlier mention (precise halfway points of the lateral and inferior arches), but, in our view, it contributes to a more aesthetically pleasing and natural profile. In previous work, Mendieta et al4 described several guidelines to be followed in the preoperative planning of gluteal plasty. According to their detailed considerations, the areas to be aspirated (superior sacrum, upper and lower-lateral flank, lower gluteal curve, and lateral thigh) ideally circumscribe the contour of the spiral. The only slight difference is that, in their design, the point of maximum lateral projection is slightly shifted upwards. Abboud et al5 described a detailed system of lines to identify an imaginary sacral diamond and surrounding structures to facilitate preoperative drawing. Although starting from completely different assumptions and considerations, it is quite surprising to note that the identification of the lowest point of the infra-gluteal sulcus is identical in both their method and ours. According to those authors, this point must fall along the vertical dorsal midaxillary point-popliteal fossa line, and then be displaced medially with respect to the midpoint of the infra-gluteal sulcus. Unfortunately, our considerations are exclusively formulated from an aesthetic-geometric point of view, without the aid of clinical cases. Nevertheless, we hope that these subtle observations could provide valuable insights for preoperative planning in cosmetic buttock surgery.
Fig. 1.
Golden (Fibonacci) spiral inscribed within a beautiful standing female buttock. A, Point of greatest lateral projection. B, Point of greatest inferior projection.
Fig. 2.
Golden (Fibonacci) spiral inscribed within a beautiful seated female buttock. A, Point of greatest lateral projection. B, Point of greatest inferior projection.
DISCLOSURE
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge Alice Morello, MD, for assistance in article preparation.
Footnotes
Published online 18 September 2024.
REFERENCES
- 1.Raposio E, Belgrano V, Santi P, et al. Which is the ideal breast size? Some social clues for plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:340–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raposio E, Baldelli I, Vappiani M, et al. The ideal buttock: some aesthetic and morphometric considerations. Eur J Plast Surg. 2023;46:915–921. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walker FDL, Kubba H, Clement WA. Use of facial proportions in pinnaplasty assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1110–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mendieta C, Stuzin JM. Gluteal augmentation and enhancement of the female silhouette: analysis and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:306–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abboud M, Geeroms M, El Hajj H, et al. Improving the female silhouette and gluteal projection: an anatomy-based, safe, and harmonious approach through liposuction, suspension loops, and moderate lipofilling. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41:474–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]