Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 30;228:116186. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116186

The role of oxidative stress in blood-brain barrier disruption during ischemic stroke: antioxidants in clinical trials

Jeffrey J Lochhead 1, Patrick T Ronaldson 1, Thomas P Davis 1
PMCID: PMC11410550  NIHMSID: NIHMS1986011  PMID: 38561092

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Occlusion and reperfusion of cerebral blood vessels (i.e., ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury) generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that contribute to brain cell death and dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via oxidative stress. BBB disruption influences the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke by contributing to cerebral edema, hemorrhagic transformation, and extravasation of circulating neurotoxic proteins. An improved understanding of mechanisms for ROS-associated alterations in BBB function during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury can lead to improved treatment paradigms for ischemic stroke. Unfortunately, progress in developing ROS targeted therapeutics that are effective for stroke treatment has been slow. Here, we review how ROS are produced in response to I/R injury, their effects on BBB integrity (i.e., tight junction protein complexes, transporters), and the utilization of antioxidant treatments in ischemic stroke clinical trials. Overall, knowledge in this area provides a strong translational framework for discovery of novel drugs for stroke and/or improved strategies to mitigate I/R injury in stroke patients.

Keywords: Blood-brain barrier, reactive oxygen species, drug delivery, tight junctions, antioxidant, transporters

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1986011-f0001.jpg

1. Introduction

Globally, stroke is the second-leading cause of death and the third-leading cause of combined morbidity and mortality (1). In the United States, stroke is the fifth leading cause of death and approximately 87% of strokes are ischemic in nature (2). The only FDA approved therapeutic to treat ischemic stroke is recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA), which must be administered within 4.5 h of the onset of stroke and carries with it an increased risk of intracranial bleeding. Additionally, surgical interventions (i.e., endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)) where an occluding thrombus is mechanically removed in an effort to restore cerebral perfusion have become routine in recent years(3). Both of these treatment strategies for stroke involve reperfusion, which can accelerate neuronal injury and contribute to post-stroke functional neurological deficits. As such, an improved understanding of pathological processes associated with ischemic stroke is critically needed to facilitate development of more effective and safer treatment paradigms.

Ischemic stroke occurs when a vessel supplying blood to the brain becomes obstructed and the brain is deprived of oxygen, glucose, and other essential nutrients. Although the human brain accounts for only 2% of the body weight, it uses 20% of the body’s energy (4). This high metabolic demand causes the brain to be especially susceptible to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. The pathogenesis of stroke is complex, but oxidative stress caused by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and/or reactive nitrogen species (RNS) has been shown to be centrally involved (57). ROS are formed by the partial reduction of oxygen and, under physiological conditions, directly interact with critical signaling molecules involved in a wide range of cellular processes including proliferation and survival, cerebral vascular tone, transcriptional regulation, apoptosis, aging, iron homeostasis, DNA damage response, and inflammation (811). When the physiological balance between ROS generation and ROS clearance exceeds antioxidant capacity, oxidative stress occurs and is followed by cellular injury. ROS can damage cells during I/R by reacting directly with macromolecules (e.g. proteins, nucleic acids, lipids), thereby increasing the permeability of the mitochondrial transition pore, reacting with free iron (Fenton reaction), activating matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and upregulating chemokines and adhesion molecules (12). The brain is especially vulnerable to oxidative stress due to its high energy consumption, lipid rich environment, and weak antioxidant capacity (13).

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) protects brain parenchyma from potentially neurotoxic substances in the circulation by regulating the permeability of substances across the cerebral endothelium. Permeability across the BBB is very low compared to the peripheral microvasculature. Demonstrating a transendothelial electrical resistance of 1500–2000 Ω•cm2, the BBB is generally only passively permeable to small, lipophilic molecules with few hydrogen bond donors and/or acceptors (1416). Passive diffusion through the paracellular route is limited by the tight junction (TJ) and adherens junction protein complexes linking endothelial cells at the BBB (17, 18). Transcellular diffusion is regulated by low rates of pinocytosis and efflux transporters (e.g. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP)) that pump lipophilic molecules from the endothelial plasma membrane back into the bloodstream (1820). Important nutrients such as glucose, amino acids, nucleosides, and certain neurotransmitters are able to gain entry into the CNS through carrier-mediated transport at the BBB (21). Alterations in the BBB’s ability to regulate entry of peripheral substances into the CNS can lead to cellular damage and neurotoxicity. Important TJ and transporter proteins that are expressed at the BBB and are important in the context of ischemic stroke are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Localization of tight junction proteins, ABC, and SLC transporters in brain microvascular endothelial cells that have been studied in the context of I/R injury.

Figure 1:

(A) Key tight junction proteins regulating paracellular permeability at the BBB include occludin, claudins-3 and -5, and ZO-1, which anchors occludin and the claudins to the actin cytoskeleton. (B) Transporters that have been shown to be upregulated in experimental stroke models and contribute to development of edema and neurological injury through dysregulation of ion gradients (i.e., SGLT1, NKCC1, NHE1/2) are shown. Additionally, MRP isoforms that include the critical endogenous antioxidant glutathione within their substrate profile are depicted at the luminal and abluminal membrane of the brain microvascular endothelial cells. Finally, ABC and SLC transporters that are involved in disposition of drugs relevant to treatment of I/R injury are shown. These include uptake transporters for statins (i.e., Oatp1a4) and memantine (Oct1/2) as well as efflux transporters that are essential determinants of CNS penetration for many currently marketed and experimental therapeutics (i.e., P-gp, Bcrp). As the evaluation of transporters in the setting of I/R injury advances, this figure will evolve to include multiple other BBB transporters.

Cerebral I/R leads to disruption of the BBB, a process that results in deleterious consequences for the CNS such as cerebral edema. Cerebral edema is a serious complication arising from ischemic stroke that can lead to death. Cytotoxic edema, characterized by increased accumulation of fluid into brain cells, and vasogenic edema are both important components of cerebral edema caused by ischemic stroke. Vasogenic edema is caused by a disruption of the TJs at the BBB and leads to extracellular accumulation of fluid and extravasation of potentially neurotoxic serum proteins. BBB disruption during reperfusion can lead to hemorrhagic transformation that may be a natural consequence of ischemic stroke or may be enhanced with r-tPA therapy (22). Later stages of TJ and BBB permeability changes following I/R are thought to be beneficial as they are associated with vascular recovery, repair, and angiogenesis. I/R induced changes to BBB permeability must also be considered in the context of drug delivery. Alterations in TJ proteins or drug transporter functional activity at the BBB can affect the ability to deliver therapeutics to the CNS at pharmacologically relevant concentrations. Due to the ability of oxidative stress to impact BBB integrity, targeting the production and/or downstream effects of ROS generation is an opportunity to develop effective therapeutic strategies to treat ischemic stroke (5). The remainder of this review will focus on how oxidative stress disrupts the BBB and the ongoing results of antioxidant therapy in human clinical trials to treat ischemic stroke.

2. Generation of ROS during ischemia/reperfusion injury

ROS include oxygen ions such as the superoxide anion (O2), free radicals such as the hydroxyl radical (OH•), the hypochlorite ion (OCl), peroxyl radicals (ROO), and peroxides such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which are unstable and capable of reacting with a wide range of molecules. O2 is highly reactive and can oxidize macromolecules or form H2O2 when protonated. Additionally, O2 readily reacts with nitric oxide (NO) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO), a highly toxic RNS that contributes to I/R brain injury primarily by reacting with tyrosine residues on proteins to form 3-nitrotyrosine adducts (23, 24). H2O2 is less reactive than superoxide but can diffuse a longer distance across membranes because it is non-polar. OH•, formed by the reduction of peroxides by reduced iron or copper ions, is highly reactive and capable of stripping electrons from nearby molecules, which further generates and propagates the production of more ROS (25). Mitochondria have been identified as a major source of ROS production during I/R (26, 27). Cellular deprivation of oxygen and glucose induces a decoupling of the mitochondrial respiratory chain that causes a build-up of reduced intermediates which can then react with oxygen to form O2 (28). Interestingly, restoration of blood flow to the ischemic tissue leads to a burst-like production of ROS which can cause reperfusion injury (2932). Thus, both ischemia and reperfusion are involved in generating ROS during stroke.

In addition to mitochondria, several different sources of ROS generation have been identified including endogenous enzymes such as the NADPH oxidase (NOX) family, xanthine oxidase (XO), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), myeloperoxidase (MPO), lipoxygenase family (LOX), and cyclooxygenase (COX) (3336). Seven isoforms of the catalytic subunit of NOX have been identified, five of which are expressed in the CNS (NOX1-5). Every cell type of the neurovascular unit expresses at least one NOX enzyme complex (37). NOX enzymes produce O2 under physiological and pathological conditions except for NOX4 that primarily produces H2O2 (12). Cerebral NOX expression and superoxide generation is increased in animal stroke models and post-mortem brain tissue of human stroke patients (3840).

NOS enzymes synthesize NO from L-arginine. Under physiological conditions, NO can act as a signaling molecule and its production is involved in synaptic plasticity in the CNS, central regulation of blood pressure, smooth muscle relaxation, and vasodilatation (41). Under pathological conditions, excess generation of NO leads to formation of ONOO and oxidative stress may result. The four isoforms of NOS are endothelial NOS (eNOS), neuronal NOS (nNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS), and mitochondrial NOS (mtNOS) (42). In the context of stroke, eNOS and nNOS are generally thought to be neuroprotective while expression of iNOS is associated with oxidative stress and I/R injury (43). The role of mtNOS in ischemic stroke is not well characterized.

Other ROS generating enzymes, such as XO, may also be involved in the pathogenesis of stroke. XO catalyzes the formation of uric acid and the oxidants O2 and H2O2 in the presence of purine substrate and molecular O2. The role of XO in I/R injury, however, is quite controversial with different studies showing either beneficial or deleterious effects of XO activity (4447).

Another significant source of oxidative stress during cerebral I/R is MPO, which is expressed on neutrophils, microglia, and monocytes/macrophages (36). MPO catalyzes the reaction of H2O2 with Cl to form chlorous acid/hypochlorite ion (HOCl/OCl), which can directly participate in redox reactions with macromolecules and trigger cell death (36, 48). An increase in neutrophils and MPO activity has been reported in both experimental stroke and ischemic stroke patients (4951) while MPO polymorphisms are associated with infarct size and functional outcome (52).

To combat oxidative stress, cells express several classes of antioxidant enzymes which convert ROS to less reactive species (Table 1). These enzymes generally metabolize either O2 or peroxides and include superoxide dismutases (SODs), catalase, thiol peroxidases such as glutathione and thioredoxin peroxidases, and peroxiredoxins (25). Glutathione, a three-amino acid reducing substrate utilized by glutathione peroxidases and peroxiredoxin 6 to remove hydroperoxides, is also an important endogenous antioxidant (53). Additionally, dietary antioxidants such as vitamins, carotenoids, polyphenols, and flavonoids obtained from plant sources can be protective against oxidative stress generated during ischemic stroke (54).

Table 1 –

Enzymes involved in the production of ROS/RNS, their role in BBB disruption, and their inhibitors in pre-clinical I/R models.

ROS/RNS generating enzyme Species generated Effects on BBB during I/R Pharmacological inhibitors
NADPH Oxidase (NOX family) O2, H2O2 (directly by NOX4 only, indirectly by dismutation of O2) ↑Brain edema, ↑Evans blue and sodium fluorescein extravasation, ↑hemorrhagic transformation; ↓claudin-5, ↓occludin, ↓collagen IV expression (38,40, 8285) Apocyanin (non-specific), VAS2870 (NOX-2/4)
Xanthine oxidase (XO) O2, H2O2 (indirectly by dismutation of O2) ↑Brain edema, ↑Sodium fluorescein extravasation (87) Allopurinol
Nitric oxide synthase (NOS family) NO, ONOO-(indirectly through reaction of O2 with NO) ↑Brain edema, ↑Evans blue extravasation, ↑vasodilation (104) Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
Lipoxygenase (LOX family) ROO ↑Brain edema, ↑Evans blue extravasation, ↑IgG extravasation, ↑hemorrhagic transformation; ↓claudin-5, ↓ZO-1 expression (83, 84) ML351 (12/15 LOX)
Cyclooxygenase (COX family) O2 ↑Brain edema, ↑Evans blue extravasation, ↑IgG extravasation, ↑hemorrhagic transformation; ↓occludin, ↓ZO-1 expression (86) Nimesulide (COX-2), CAY10404 (COX-2)
Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (HOCl/OCl) ↑Brain edema,↑IgG extravasation (9294) N-acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide, 4-aminobenzoic acid hydrazide

A key signaling pathway inducing expression of antioxidant enzymes is the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)–antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway. Under physiological conditions, Nrf2 is inactivated by binding to the Kelch-like ECH-related protein 1 (Keap1) at the actin cytoskeleton. Keap1 senses electrophilic stress via redox-sensitive Cys residues and these events disrupt the Keap1-Nrf2 interaction to suppress proteasomal degradation. Under conditions of oxidative stress, ROS react with Nrf2 and cause it to dissociate from Keap1 and translocate to the nucleus where it binds to AREs resulting in increased expression of antioxidant enzymes (55). The ability of Nrf2 signaling to regulate cellular responses to ROS requires involvement of other intracellular signaling pathways (56). This is supported by the observation that pharmacological inhibitors of p53 (i.e., pifithrin), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (i.e., SB203580), and nuclear factor (NF)-κB (i.e., N4-[2-(4-phenoxyphenyl)ethyl]-4,6-quinazolinediamine, SN50) blocked effects of the Nrf2 activator sulforaphane on BBB target proteins such as P-gp (56).

3. Effects of oxidative stress on BBB Integrity during I/R

Neuronal homeostasis depends on proper functioning of the BBB. Cerebral I/R both generates ROS and alters expression, activity, or localization of antioxidant enzymes resulting in oxidative stress. The increased production of ROS combined with reduced cellular antioxidant capacity causes several pathophysiological changes at the BBB that contribute to brain injury and recovery following ischemic stroke. BBB disruption caused by I/R leads to leakage of blood constituents into the brain parenchyma, vasogenic edema, hemorrhagic transformation, and leukocyte infiltration. Leukocytes are also a source of ROS generation and their entry into the CNS further exacerbates oxidative stress in the brain (57).

Many previous studies have shown that oxidative stress is associated with cerebral I/R injury. Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats has shown a steady increase in ROS production during ischemia with a burst of ROS production upon reperfusion (30). MCAO in mice induces formation of O2 and ONOO in areas of microvessels colocalized with markers of BBB disruption, such as Evans blue leakage (58). An increase in lipid peroxidation and 3-nitrotyrosine formation has also been found in rat brains following I/R (5961). Levels of the antioxidant enzyme SOD and the endogenous antioxidant glutathione are also altered by I/R in rats (62). Higher SOD indicates a cellular response to ROS generation while depletion of GSH suggests ROS formation due to I/R. In human stroke patients, plasma levels of 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and malondialdehyde, markers of lipid peroxidation, are significantly higher than in control subjects (63, 64). Plasma levels of the oxidative biomarker F2-isoprostane, a prostaglandin-like compound formed by free radical-initiated peroxidation of arachidonic acid, are elevated in the hyperacute phase of ischemic stroke and are predictive of infarct growth (65). Nitrates and nitrites, markers of NO production, are also elevated in the CSF of stroke patients in a manner which correlates with infarct size (66).

The BBB shows an increase in permeability during I/R in both animal models and humans (67). The degree of BBB opening in experimental stroke is either continuous and monophasic in nature or biphasic depending on the animal model, species, severity of I/R injury, method of detection, and time point examined (6772). Bernardo-Castro et al. have proposed that the hyperacute phase (< 6 h) of BBB opening is caused by hypoxia while the acute phase (6–72 h) is mediated by inflammation and reperfusion injury. The subacute phase (72 h-6 wks) is associated with angiogenic and recovery processes, and the chronic phase (> 6 wks) coincides with neovascularization (73). Thus, early phases of BBB disruption likely contribute to cell injury and death while the later phases are associated with vascular recovery and repair. ROS production is able to alter BBB function by modifying proteins (e.g. TJ complexes, basement membrane, adherens junctions), lipids, DNA, and intracellular signaling pathways (74).

Several NOX isoforms have shown involvement in BBB disruption in animal models of stroke. In mice lacking gp91phox, a subunit of NOX, mice displayed reduced infarct volume and brain edema 1 h into reperfusion (75). Apocyanin, a nonspecific NOX inhibitor, reduced Evans blue leakage after MCAO in a dose-dependent manner (75). NOX2 and NOX4, but not NOX1, expression is increased in the brains of mice during reperfusion after MCAO (38). Administration of the NOX2/4 inhibitor VAS2870 30 min before reperfusion reduced infarct size, Evans blue extravasation, and hemorrhagic transformation 24 h after ischemia. VAS2870 also prevented reperfusion-induced alterations to the TJ proteins claudin-5 and occludin as well as the basement membrane protein collagen IV (38). NOX4 expression is upregulated in neurons and endothelial cells in mice after MCAO and in human stroke patients after routine autopsy (40). Kleinschnitz et al. found that MCAO in mice induces a decreased infarct volume in NOX4-null mice compared to wild-type mice while mice deficient in NOX1 or NOX2 show no difference in infarct volume (40). In contrast, De Silva et al. found decreased in 3-nitrotyrosine formation in the MCA and reduced infarct volume in NOX2−/− mice after MCAO (76). NOX4 knockout mice also show reduced 3-nitrotyrosine formation, reduced Evans blue extravasation, and less edema after MCAO suggesting ROS formation is involved in the development of cerebral edema after I/R (40, 77). However, one study in NOX1 knockout mice showed no differences in brain edema following MCAO while another study showed a decrease in brain edema and BBB permeability to Evans blue and sodium fluorescein (78, 79). In a humanized NOX5 knock-in mouse model, mice displayed an increase in ROS formation, BBB leakage to Evans blue, and infarct size after MCAO compared to wild type mice (80). In short, NOX 5 is a developing story in I/R.

An important role for the lipoxygenase family in promoting BBB damage following I/R has been demonstrated in several studies. LOX generates ROO and can directly oxidize lipid membranes containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (81). 12/15 LOX levels are increased in neurons and endothelial cells following transient focal ischemia and LOX metabolites are increased in gerbils following bilateral common carotid occlusion and reperfusion (82, 83). LOX gene knockout or inhibition with baicalein reduced brain edema, extravasation of IgG, and claudin-5 down-regulation after MCAO (83). In an embolic MCAO model, the 12/15 LOX inhibitor ML351 significantly reduced tPA-related hemorrhage, IgG extravasation, and loss of the TJ proteins claudin-5 and ZO-1 (84). Given LOX’s roles in producing pro-inflammatory mediators and cell signaling, it should be noted that beneficial effects of LOX inhibition in cerebral I/R models may be independent of its role in generating oxidative stress.

COX enzymes are also capable of generating free radicals and impacting BBB integrity during cerebral I/R injury (85). Cortical, but not subcortical, Evans blue leakage was reduced in an MCAO model when the COX-2 inhibitor nimesulide was administered either immediately or 6 h after the onset of ischemia (86). Following MCAO, reduced extravasation of IgG, significantly lower brain hemoglobin levels, and higher expression of the TJ proteins occludin and ZO-1 was observed in COX-2 knockout mice or mice that had been administered the COX-2 inhibitor CAY10404 compared to controls (86). Similar to LOX, COX enzymes are also prominently involved in producing inflammatory mediators that may affect BBB permeability independent of ROS generation.

XO activity is also involved in BBB disruption during cerebral I/R injury. One study showed the XO inhibitor allopurinol reduced brain edema and BBB permeability to the small molecule tracer sodium fluorescein (87). Interestingly, XO is involved in the formation of uric acid which itself possesses antioxidant properties and shows therapeutic potential for the treatment of ischemic stroke (8890). In addition to uric acid’s antioxidant properties, it also activates several intracellular signaling pathways, suggesting its therapeutic potential may not be due solely to ROS scavenging (91).

Following cerebral I/R injury, circulating neutrophils enter the brain and contribute to oxidative stress and BBB disruption (57). MPO is abundantly expressed in neutrophils and contributes to the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine adducts after MCAO (23). Matsuo et al. showed a significant decrease in brain edema following MCAO by depleting circulating neutrophils with an antibody (92). Pharmacological inhibition of MPO with N-acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide in an MCAO mouse model reduced infarct volume, IgG extravasation and the oxidative stress markers chlorotyrosine, 3-nitrotyrosine, and 4-HNE (93). In mouse brain endothelial cells, addition of the MPO/H2O2/Cl system resulted in compromised barrier function. This affect was attenuated by the MPO inhibitor 4-aminobenzoic acid hydrazide (94).

It has also been demonstrated that activation of the Nrf2 pathway with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a drug already in clinical use, protects BBB integrity in ischemic stroke models. DMF causes a dissociation of keap-1 from Nrf2 which results in nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and transcription of antioxidant genes (95). In a mouse model of hypoxia-ischemia, pre-treatment with DMF up-regulated Nrf2 mRNA, enhanced expression levels of Nrf2 target antioxidant proteins, and reduced brain edema and infarct size (96). In an MCAO mouse model, pre-treatment with DMF prevented BBB tight junction alterations and brain edema (97).

NOS isoforms generate NO, which is important in the pathogenesis of stroke due to its reactive nature as a free radical, ability to increase vasodilation, role in cellular signaling, and ability to generate ONOO when reacting with O2. Cerebral I/R has been shown to increase the expression of eNOS, iNOS, and nNOS (98, 99). NO can have protective or detrimental effects during I/R depending on the isozyme that is involved. For example, mice deficient in nNOS have smaller infarcts after MCAO while mice deficient in eNOS have larger infarcts after MCAO, suggesting that eNOS is protective and nNOS is detrimental in the context of cerebral I/R injury (100, 101). Genetic deletion of the iNOS gene and pharmacological inhibition of iNOS both reduced infarct size following I/R in mice (102, 103). Administration of the non-specific NOS inhibitor nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) to rats undergoing MCAO resulted in reduced brain edema and Evans blue extravasation (104). The role of different NOS isoforms in mediating BBB disruption during I/R injury needs further investigation, but the increased production of NO or ONOO associated with activation of NOS is likely involved due to the ability of ROS to activate matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) by oxidation or nitrosylation (105107) leading to leak.

MMPs are a family of zinc-containing endopeptidases that are activated during cerebral I/R and are capable of degrading TJ proteins and components of the extracelluar matrix. In addition to direct activation by ROS, MMP expression can be increased through actions on redox-sensitive elements of transcription factors (such as NF-κB and AP-1) that are known to be binding sites for MMP transcription (108). MMP-9 knockout mice subjected to MCAO display reduced Evans blue leakage and degradation of ZO-1 compared to wild type (109). In Mn-SOD knockout mice undergoing transient focal ischemia, there is increased MMP-9 expression which is associated with TJ alterations and Evans blue extravasation (110). Administration of the broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor BB-1101 reduced BBB leakage to [14C]-sucrose and degradation of the TJ proteins occludin and claudin-5 following MCAO in spontaneously hypertensive rats (111). Treatment with ONOO decomposition catalysts prevented MMP-2 and MMP-9 activation and reduced brain edema volume in rats undergoing MCAO (24, 106). These observations were associated with a preservation of collagen IV and brain endothelium (106). L-NAME reduced Evans blue leakage, ZO-1 degradation, and MMP-2 and 9 activity in rats when administered 15 min before MCAO (112). Overexpression of Cu/Zn-SOD has been shown to reduce hyperglycemia-enhanced Evans blue leakage and MMP-9 activation after MCAO in rats (113). MMPs also play a prominent role in the development of hemorrhagic transformation. MMP-3−/− mice, but not MMP-9−/− mice, treated with r-tPA after MCAO showed an increase in intracranial bleeding compared to wild-type mice (114). The free radical scavenger edaravone and the spin-trapping agent α-phenyl tert butyl nitrone also prevented r-tPA-induced intracerebral bleeding after MCAO in rats (115, 116). Taken together, these observations suggest ROS activate MMPs which subsequently disrupt BBB integrity during I/R leading to leak and edema.

It is plausible that ROS-induced alterations of TJ proteins contribute to increased BBB permeability observed in I/R injury. Not only do ROS activate the TJ-degrading MMPs, but ROS can also induce TJ changes by structural modifications (i.e. – protein nitrosylation, lipid peroxidation, etc.) or inducing translocation away from the TJ protein complex (117). As little as 1 h of hypoxia followed by 20 min of reoxygenation in rats increased BBB permeability to [14C]-sucrose and induced changes in structure and localization of the TJ protein occludin and these alterations can be prevented by pre-administration with the antioxidant TEMPOL (118). In bovine brain endothelial cells, hypoxia and reoxygenation increased permeability of [14C]-sucrose and iNOS expression (119). Although many studies have shown alterations in TJ protein expression or localization is associated with an increase in BBB permeability during experimental stroke (72, 109, 111, 112, 120125), other mechanisms of BBB disruption during I/R have been proposed. Some studies performed in experimental stroke models have shown an increase in BBB permeability without apparent disruption of the TJ. An increase in brain endothelial transcytosis through vesicles or non-selective channels and endothelial degeneration have also been suggested as mechanisms responsible for increasing BBB permeability in response to cerebral I/R (126129). Differences in ischemic pre-clinical models, time points examined, and/or detection methods may influence whether TJ alterations are observed during cerebral I/R. These different mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and all may play a role in BBB opening at different time points following ischemic stroke. Although oxidative stress is well known to cause endothelial cell death (130133), the effects of oxidative stress on transcytosis at the BBB is an area that warrants further investigation.

Studies in rodents with genetically altered levels of endogenous antioxidant enzymes also indicate an important role for ROS production on BBB disruption and infarct volumes. Mice subjected to MCAO and deficient in Cu/Zn-SOD (SOD1) or Mn-SOD (SOD2) exhibit larger infarct volumes, Evans blue extravasation, and brain swelling, while rats overexpressing Cu/Zn SOD have reduced infarct volumes and edema formation after MCAO (110, 134, 135). Overexpression of human glutathione peroxidase also reduces brain edema and preserves vascular integrity in mouse I/R models (136, 137).

4. Effects of oxidative stress on BBB Transport Systems during I/R

It should also be noted that cerebral I/R can alter functional expression of putative membrane transport systems at the level of brain microvascular endothelial cells. In fact, many members of solute carrier (SLC) family of transport proteins are susceptible to modulation in the setting of pathological states with an oxidative stress component. For example, Yeh and colleagues observed upregulation of glucose transporter 1 (Glut1) in rat brain endothelial cells exposed to conditioned medium derived from rat C6 glioma cells exposed to hypoxic conditions (138). Similar results were obtained in an in vivo model of experimental ischemic stroke where male CD-1 mice subjected to 1 h occlusion of the middle cerebral artery followed by 24 h reperfusion exhibited increased Glut1 expression and transport activity at the BBB(139). I/R injury was also shown to induce functional expression of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (Sglt1) in brain capillaries isolated from male Wistar rats(140). Sglt1 was previously shown to be a critical determinant of blood-to-brain glucose delivery and development of cerebral edema in the setting of I/R(141). Of particular significance, pharmacological inhibition of Sglt1 in male CD-1 mice subjected to MCAO reduced both infarction volumes and edema ratios, which suggests that this transporter may be a viable target for stroke treatment(141). More recently, Stanton and colleagues showed a non-significant increase in organic cation transporter 1 (Oct1) in cortical microvessels isolated from male Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to 90 min MCAO followed by 2 h reperfusion(142). Additionally, Williams et al. showed decreased expression of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1a4 (Oatp1a4) at the BBB in ipsilateral cerebral cortex tissue from male Sprague-Dawley rats under the same MCAO conditions used in the study by Stanton(143). Despite the need to interrogate the temporal relationship between reperfusion and Oct1/Oatp1a4 changes in brain microvascular endothelial cells, these results can have profound implications for CNS delivery of drugs capable of improving post-stroke outcomes such as memantine (i.e., an Oct transport substrate) and atorvastatin (i.e., an Oatp transport substrate)(142144).

Transport mechanisms for ions are also modulated in response to ischemic conditions. In fact, progression of edema following I/R can be exacerbated by increased brain uptake of sodium ions. Increased flux of Na+ and Cl and, subsequently, movement of osmotically obliged water across the BBB results from enhanced functional expression of Na-K-Cl cotransporter NKCC(145) and Na-proton exchangers NHE1 and NHE2(146). Indeed, NHE1 activity is critical to the regulation of edema volume following I/R injury(147). Additionally, cerebral sodium uptake and cytotoxic edema were reduced in the presence of TRAM-34, a small molecule inhibitor of the BBB calcium-activated potassium channel KCa3.1, suggesting a paramount role for this ion exchanger in the onset of edema following MCAO(148).

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efflux transporters are established determinants of drug penetration into brain parenchyma. As such, members of this transporter superfamily have been evaluated in the context of I/R injury. Functional expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a 170 kDa integral membrane protein encoded by the multidrug resistance (MDR) gene, has been shown to be altered at the BBB following an ischemic insult. Specifically, Spudich and colleagues showed increased P-gp protein expression in CD31-positive brain microvacular endothelial cells at 3 h and 24 h post-MCAO(149). Additionally, P-gp expression has been shown to be enhanced in cerebral microvessels following 90 min MCAO as well as in cultured rat brain endothelial cells subjected to hypoxia/aglycemia(150). Regulation of P-gp expression and/or activity under oxidative stress conditions is likely to be complex and involve multiple molecular pathways in brain endothelial cells. For example, P-gp transport activity was shown to be increased in rat brain endothelial cells in vitro and in rat hippocampal tissue in vivo following activation of NF-κB signaling in response to hyperammonemia, a pathological condition associated with oxidative stress(151). In contrast, hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress caused a rapid decrease in P-gp functional expression in a human brain microvessel endothelial cell line (hCMEC/d3)(152). This effect was triggered by activation of Abl and Src kinases, which phosphorylated caveolin-1 and promoted cellular internalization of P-gp(152). These two studies points towards complex regulation of P-gp under oxidative stress conditions and suggest that rigorous molecular studies are needed to fully understand the pathways involved. Indeed, altered transport activity of P-gp can have profound implications for CNS delivery of therapeutics relevant to treatment of ischemic stroke. Indeed, several drugs with neuroprotective properties have been shown to be P-gp transport substrates. For example, P-gp has been shown to be involved in CNS disposition of tanshinone IIA, a component of Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge that has been studied for effectiveness as a stroke drug (153). More recently, studies in cultured human endothelial cells (154) and in vivo in female Sprague-Dawley rats (155) have identified the commonly prescribed statin drug atorvastatin as a P-gp transport substrates. Indeed, preclinical (143) and clinical studies (156) have shown that atorvastatin can provide therapeutic benefits in the setting of ischemic stroke. These findings can be interpreted to imply that inhibition of P-gp transport activity can be an effective strategy to optimize drug delivery to ischemic brain tissue. Using the established P-gp inhibitor tariquidar, Bauer and colleagues have reported proof-of-concept data that near-complete inhibition of P-gp mediated transport is achievable at the human BBB (157); however, the ubiquitous expression profile of P-gp must be considered before incorporating this strategy as a stroke treatment paradigm. P-gp is expressed in multiple barrier epithelial cells including colon, small intestine, renal proximal tubules, and bile canaliculi(3). As such, inhibition of P-gp at the BBB using pharmacological antagonists will also block P-gp function in other tissues, an effect that can increase disposition of drugs throughout the body and enhance the probability of off-target effects and/or dose-limiting toxicities (158, 159).

P-gp is known to function in synergy with breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), a 72-kDa protein that is encoded by the ABCG2 gene (160). Recently, quantitative targeted proteomics studies have shown that the relative abundance of BCRP is higher at the human BBB as compared to P-gp (161). Given the considerable overlap in substrate profile with P-gp (162), BCRP may provide a greater contribution than P-gp to overall BBB efflux transport in health and disease. Functional expression of BCRP has been shown to be altered in response to pathophysiological conditions relevant to ischemic stroke. For example, experimental work conducted in a co-culture model comprised of bovine brain endothelial cells and rat astrocytes demonstrated that Abcg2 mRNA was decreased in response to oxygen/glucose deprivation conditions (163). Of particular significance, Abcg2 transcript levels returned to baseline expression after reoxygenation for 24 h or 48 h (163). Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), a known antioxidant, is a Bcrp transport substrate (164). Indeed, changes in Bcrp expression and transport activity in diseases with an oxidative stress component may affect the CNS disposition and potential therapeutic efficacy of such compounds. As such, it is critical that these findings on Bcrp be validated using in vivo models of experimental stroke, particularly due to the fact that this efflux transporter is known to play a critical role in CNS disposition of stroke drugs such as statins (154, 155).

Additionally, ABC transporters have potential to play a critical role in oxidative stress responses in cellular compartments of the NVU. Indeed, members of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) family are known to actively efflux the endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH), which can have significant implications for pathologies with an oxidative stress component such as I/R. GSH is responsible for maintenance of cellular redox balance and antioxidant defense in the brain. It has previously been reported that various Mrp isoforms are upregulated in response to oxidative stress conditions. For example, increased expression of mRNA transcripts for Mrp1, Mrp2, and Mrp4 were observed in cerebral microvessels isolated from female Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to hypoxia/reoxygenation stress (165). Additionally, acetaminophen intoxicated male C57BL/6J mice, an in vivo condition where oxidative stress was demonstrated by induction of Nad(p)h:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (Nqo1) and hemooxygenase 1 (Ho-1) mRNA and protein, showed increased brain expression of Mrp2 and Mrp4 (166). In both studies, induction of Mrp expression resulted from activation of Nrf2 signaling (165, 166). In primary cultures of rat astrocytes exposed to the human deficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope protein gp120, increased functional expression of Mrp1 resulted in enhanced cellular efflux of GSH (167). In this in vitro model of HIV-associated glial cell injury, oxidative stress was demonstrated by increased expression of heat-shock protein 70 and iNOS as well as increased intracellular concentrations of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescein fluorescence (167). Molecular mechanisms involved in regulation of Mrp1 expression in cultured rat astrocytes following treatment with gp120 include NF-κB signaling and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway (168) Enhanced expression and activity of Mrp isoforms at the BBB/NVU can cause reduced brain and/or endothelial cell concentrations of GSH, an alteration in cellular redox status, and increased potential for cellular injury. Additionally, studies in rat cerebellar granule neurons showed that hydrogen-peroxide induced oxidative stress induced Mrp1-mediated efflux transport of GSH (169). Therefore, the implications of changes in Mrp activity in cellular components of the NVU following exposure to ROS and subsequent oxidative stress require more rigorous evaluation.

5. Clinical use of antioxidants to treat ischemic stroke

Data generated in animal models of stroke indicates ROS production significantly contributes to BBB disruption and detrimental outcomes during cerebral I/R. The use of antioxidants capable of inhibiting oxidation or ROS production to treat ischemic stroke is a strategy that has been attempted over the past several decades. For example, TEMPOL was shown to reduce cerebral glutamate concentrations, decrease infarction volume, and improve neurobehavioral outcomes in male Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to 2 h MCAO (170) Although TEMPOL, as well as other antioxidant drugs, have not received FDA approval as stroke therapeutics, one such compound, edaravone, has been approved to treat ischemic stroke in Japan since 2001.

In a mouse model of prolonged cerebral hypoperfusion, edaravone reduced both MMP-9 expression and BBB permeability to immunoglobulin G while a rat model of transient focal ischemia showed edaravone significantly lowered brain edema (171, 172). In rats subjected to MCAO, edaravone inhibited MMP-9 activity and intracranial bleeding after r-tPA administration (115). Nearly two dozen clinical trials have been performed utilizing edaravone to treat stroke. These trials were typically small, conducted in Asian patients, and yielded mixed results (173181). A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies administering edaravone for treatment of ischemic stroke showed edaravone use was associated with improved chances of a good or excellent outcome after 90 days and lower mortality but no differences in intracranial bleeding (182). Another systematic review with meta-analysis suggested edaravone treatment for acute ischemic stroke showed improved function in daily activities, improved neurological deficit on short-term follow-up, and improvements in re-canalization, but no significant effect on death or disability (183). Limitations of these meta-analyses include only a small number of RCTs, heterogeneity in the included trials, few studies reporting long term results, and many studies being performed in Asian populations.

Ebselen is an organoselenium compound with glutathione peroxidase-like activity. In pre-clinical I/R models, ebselen reduced markers of oxidative stress and significantly lowered brain edema (184186). In a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to treat acute MCAO, oral ebselen was well-tolerated and significantly reduced infarction volume and improved neurological outcomes in patients who started treatment within 6 h of onset, which suggests that ebselen may exhibit neuroprotective properties relevant to ischemic stroke treatment (187). In a different trial, patients treated with ebselen had a significantly better outcome at 1 month, but not at 3 months, and the outcome of patients receiving ebselen early (≤ 24 h) was superior to that of patients who received later (> 24 h) treatment (188).

Tirilazad is a synthetic aminosteroid capable of scavenging hydroxyl and lipid peroxyl radicals and stabilizing membranes (189). Although tirilazad displayed neuroprotection in a number of experimental stroke models, a meta-analysis of six double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials showed tirilazad increased death or disability by about one-fifth (190). A systemic review of tirilazad treatment in experimental stroke models suggested that the broad range of doses tested, long time interval (~ 5 h) between stroke onset and initiation of treatment, and lack of pre-clinical efficacy in gyrencephalic species all may have influenced the discrepancy between animal and human studies (191).

Disodium 2,4-disulphophenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (NXY-059), a free-radical spin trapping agent, is neuroprotective in pre-clinical I/R models and has been used in clinical trials to treat ischemic stroke. A meta-analysis of experimental stroke in rodents, rabbits, or primates in 15 different studies showed NXY-059 to be neuroprotective when administered up to 4 h after occlusion (192). The beneficial effects observed in pre-clinical stroke models led to the use of NXY-059 to treat ischemic stroke in human trials. Although the first study showed NXY-059 administered intravenously within 6 h of stroke onset to be significantly better than placebo in improving outcome, the second study with a larger sample size showed NXY-059 was neutral for the primary and all secondary outcomes. A pooled analysis of these two trials confirmed neutral results in the overall population as well as those treated early or with alteplase (193). It has been suggested the discordance between animal and human studies is due to the pre-clinical studies not being relevant to the human condition, the short delay (typically 5–30 min) between onset of ischemia and administration of NXY-059 to animals, study quality biases, and low BBB permeability of NXY-059 (192, 194, 195).

6. Conclusions

The past several decades of pre-clinical experiments in cell culture and animal models of I/R and clinical observations have suggested oxidative stress is prominently involved in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. ROS production during cerebral I/R damages BBB integrity by modulating tight junction protein complexes and altering homeostatic transport mechanisms in brain microvascular endothelial cells. These molecular changes contribute to brain edema, hemorrhagic transformation, extravasation of serum proteins, and altered drug delivery to the CNS (Figure 2). A rigorous understanding of these mechanisms and time-course of ROS production and toxicity in experimental stroke models will provide critical information that will lead to new drugs, repurposing of currently marketed therapeutics, and/or strategies to target oxidative stress following ischemic stroke. Many antioxidant drugs have shown the capability to provide neuroprotection in experimental stroke models; however, results have been somewhat discordant in human trials. Adherence to Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) criteria for preclinical studies (i.e., in vivo dose-response experiments with appropriate allometric scaling, establishment of a time window for effective therapy, blinded study design in reproducible and physiologically controlled animal models, assessment of both histological and functional outcomes at acute and chronic poststroke time points, and use of rodents for initial proof-of-concept studies before consideration of higher order species) provides important guidance to improve the probability of successfully identifying novel stroke drugs(144). This certainly applies to development of novel antioxidant compounds. Other considerations for improved outcomes of antioxidant therapy in human ischemic stroke trials can occur if these drugs are administered earlier, in conjunction with r-tPA treatment, or co-administered along with therapeutic targeting of different ROS pathways. Overall, rationale design and development of novel antioxidant drugs offers an opportunity to advance stroke pharmacotherapy; however, careful experimental design and a more detailed understanding of oxidative stress mechanisms in the brain is required to move these compounds from the bench to the bedside.

Figure 2 – Effects of ROS production on BBB integrity during ischemic stroke.

Figure 2 –

In the healthy brain (A), the BBB is intact and acts as a barrier allowing for selective entry of substances to the brain from the blood. During cerebral I/R injury (B), the BBB is compromised and substances in the blood may enter the brain through alterations in paracellular or transcellular permeability. Potential consequences of BBB damage during ischemic stroke include leak (vasogenic edema), extravasation of serum proteins, hemorrhagic transformation, and altered drug delivery. Therapeutics may exhibit higher or lower BBB permeability during ischemic stroke depending on whether they are substrates of transporter proteins which have been affected by I/R stress (Image created using BioRender.com).

Acknowledgments:

This work is funded by grants from the National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NINDS; R01 NS084941) to P.T.R. and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA; R01 DA051812) to T.P.D. and P.T.R.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declarations of interest: none

References

  • 1.Collaborators GBDS. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93–e621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nilles KL, Williams EI, Betterton RD, Davis TP, Ronaldson PT. Blood-Brain Barrier Transporters: Opportunities for Therapeutic Development in Ischemic Stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rolfe DF, Brown GC. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiol Rev. 1997;77(3):731–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chamorro A, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. Neuroprotection in acute stroke: targeting excitotoxicity, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and inflammation. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(8):869–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jurcau A, Ardelean AI. Oxidative Stress in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injuries following Acute Ischemic Stroke. Biomedicines. 2022;10(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kamal FZ, Lefter R, Jaber H, Balmus IM, Ciobica A, Iordache AC. The Role of Potential Oxidative Biomarkers in the Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke and the Exploration of Antioxidants as Possible Preventive and Treatment Options. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Di Virgilio F New pathways for reactive oxygen species generation in inflammation and potential novel pharmacological targets. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(14):1647–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ray PD, Huang BW, Tsuji Y. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell Signal. 2012;24(5):981–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chrissobolis S, Faraci FM. The role of oxidative stress and NADPH oxidase in cerebrovascular disease. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14(11):495–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Faraci FM. Reactive oxygen species: influence on cerebral vascular tone. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(2):739–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kleikers PW, Wingler K, Hermans JJ, Diebold I, Altenhofer S, Radermacher KA, et al. NADPH oxidases as a source of oxidative stress and molecular target in ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Mol Med (Berl). 2012;90(12):1391–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salim S Oxidative Stress and the Central Nervous System. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;360(1):201–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Banks WA. Characteristics of compounds that cross the blood-brain barrier. BMC Neurol. 2009;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Banks WA, Greig NH. Small molecules as central nervous system therapeutics: old challenges, new directions, and a philosophic divide. Future Med Chem. 2019;11(6):489–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Butt AM, Jones HC, Abbott NJ. Electrical resistance across the blood-brain barrier in anaesthetized rats: a developmental study. J Physiol. 1990;429:47–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brightman MW, Reese TS. Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain. The Journal of cell biology. 1969;40(3):648–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ. Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol. 1967;34(1):207–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brzica H, Abdullahi W, Ibbotson K, Ronaldson PT. Role of Transporters in Central Nervous System Drug Delivery and Blood-Brain Barrier Protection: Relevance to Treatment of Stroke. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2017;9:1179573517693802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ronaldson PT, Davis TP. Transport Mechanisms at the Blood-Brain Barrier and in Cellular Compartments of the Neurovascular Unit: Focus on CNS Delivery of Small Molecule Drugs. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ohtsuki S, Terasaki T. Contribution of carrier-mediated transport systems to the blood-brain barrier as a supporting and protecting interface for the brain; importance for CNS drug discovery and development. Pharm Res. 2007;24(9):1745–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hong JM, Kim DS, Kim M. Hemorrhagic Transformation After Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms and Management. Front Neurol. 2021;12:703258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takizawa S, Fukuyama N, Hirabayashi H, Nakazawa H, Shinohara Y. Dynamics of nitrotyrosine formation and decay in rat brain during focal ischemia-reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19(6):667–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thiyagarajan M, Kaul CL, Sharma SS. Neuroprotective efficacy and therapeutic time window of peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts in focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142(5):899–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Veal E, Jackson T, Latimer H. Role/s of ‘Antioxidant’ Enzymes in Ageing. Subcell Biochem. 2018;90:425–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang JL, Mukda S, Chen SD. Diverse roles of mitochondria in ischemic stroke. Redox Biol. 2018;16:263–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zorov DB, Juhaszova M, Sollott SJ. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(3):909–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turrens JF. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J Physiol. 2003;552(Pt 2):335–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Granger DN, Kvietys PR. Reperfusion injury and reactive oxygen species: The evolution of a concept. Redox Biol. 2015;6:524–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Peters O, Back T, Lindauer U, Busch C, Megow D, Dreier J, et al. Increased formation of reactive oxygen species after permanent and reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18(2):196–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chouchani ET, Pell VR, Gaude E, Aksentijevic D, Sundier SY, Robb EL, et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2014;515(7527):431–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yamato M, Egashira T, Utsumi H. Application of in vivo ESR spectroscopy to measurement of cerebrovascular ROS generation in stroke. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003;35(12):1619–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kontos HA. Oxygen radicals in cerebral ischemia: the 2001 Willis lecture. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2712–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li W, Yang S. Targeting oxidative stress for the treatment of ischemic stroke: Upstream and downstream therapeutic strategies. Brain Circ. 2016;2(4):153–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen S, Chen H, Du Q, Shen J. Targeting Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Mediated Oxidative Stress and Inflammation for Reducing Brain Ischemia Injury: Potential Application of Natural Compouds. Front Physiol. 2020;11:433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang YC, Lu YB, Huang XL, Lao YF, Zhang L, Yang J, et al. Myeloperoxidase: a new target for the treatment of stroke? Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(8):1711–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hernandes MS, Xu Q, Griendling KK. Role of NADPH Oxidases in Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Ischemic Stroke. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tuo YH, Liu Z, Chen JW, Wang QY, Li SL, Li MC, et al. NADPH oxidase inhibitor improves outcome of mechanical reperfusion by suppressing hemorrhagic transformation. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(5):492–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vallet P, Charnay Y, Steger K, Ogier-Denis E, Kovari E, Herrmann F, et al. Neuronal expression of the NADPH oxidase NOX4, and its regulation in mouse experimental brain ischemia. Neuroscience. 2005;132(2):233–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kleinschnitz C, Grund H, Wingler K, Armitage ME, Jones E, Mittal M, et al. Post-stroke inhibition of induced NADPH oxidase type 4 prevents oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Forstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(7):829–37, 37a-37d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Levine AB, Punihaole D, Levine TB. Characterization of the role of nitric oxide and its clinical applications. Cardiology. 2012;122(1):55–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu H, Li J, Zhao F, Wang H, Qu Y, Mu D. Nitric oxide synthase in hypoxic or ischemic brain injury. Rev Neurosci. 2015;26(1):105–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Berry CE, Hare JM. Xanthine oxidoreductase and cardiovascular disease: molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological implications. J Physiol. 2004;555(Pt 3):589–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Betz AL, Randall J, Martz D. Xanthine oxidase is not a major source of free radicals in focal cerebral ischemia. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(2 Pt 2):H563–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kinuta Y, Kimura M, Itokawa Y, Ishikawa M, Kikuchi H. Changes in xanthine oxidase in ischemic rat brain. J Neurosurg. 1989;71(3):417–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Britnell SR, Chillari KA, Brown JN. The Role of Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors in Patients with History of Stroke: A Systematic Review. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2018;16(6):583–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Davies MJ. Myeloperoxidase: Mechanisms, reactions and inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in inflammatory diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;218:107685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barone FC, Hillegass LM, Price WJ, White RF, Lee EV, Feuerstein GZ, et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration into cerebral focal ischemic tissue: myeloperoxidase activity assay and histologic verification. J Neurosci Res. 1991;29(3):336–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jin Y, Wei F, Dai X, Qi M, Ma Y. Anti-inflammatory effect of 4-methylcyclopentadecanone in rats submitted to ischemic stroke. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2018;32(3):270–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kong LL, Wang ZY, Han N, Zhuang XM, Wang ZZ, Li H, et al. Neutralization of chemokine-like factor 1, a novel C-C chemokine, protects against focal cerebral ischemia by inhibiting neutrophil infiltration via MAPK pathways in rats. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hoy A, Leininger-Muller B, Poirier O, Siest G, Gautier M, Elbaz A, et al. Myeloperoxidase polymorphisms in brain infarction. Association with infarct size and functional outcome. Atherosclerosis. 2003;167(2):223–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Forman HJ. Redox signaling: An evolution from free radicals to aging. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;97:398–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Feng J, Zheng Y, Guo M, Ares I, Martinez M, Lopez-Torres B, et al. Oxidative stress, the blood-brain barrier and neurodegenerative diseases: The critical beneficial role of dietary antioxidants. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13(10):3988–4024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kume T Therapeutic Potential of the Activators of the Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2-Antioxidant Response Element Pathway in Brain Disorders. Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(5):553–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang X, Campos CR, Peart JC, Smith LK, Boni JL, Cannon RE, et al. Nrf2 upregulates ATP binding cassette transporter expression and activity at the blood-brain and blood-spinal cord barriers. J Neurosci. 2014;34(25):8585–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jickling GC, Liu D, Ander BP, Stamova B, Zhan X, Sharp FR. Targeting neutrophils in ischemic stroke: translational insights from experimental studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(6):888–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gursoy-Ozdemir Y, Can A, Dalkara T. Reperfusion-induced oxidative/nitrative injury to neurovascular unit after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1449–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sakamoto A, Ohnishi ST, Ohnishi T, Ogawa R. Relationship between free radical production and lipid peroxidation during ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat brain. Brain Res. 1991;554(1–2):186–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Watson BD, Busto R, Goldberg WJ, Santiso M, Yoshida S, Ginsberg MD. Lipid peroxidation in vivo induced by reversible global ischemia in rat brain. J Neurochem. 1984;42(1):268–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fukuyama N, Takizawa S, Ishida H, Hoshiai K, Shinohara Y, Nakazawa H. Peroxynitrite formation in focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats occurs predominantly in the peri-infarct region. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18(2):123–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Collino M, Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Gallicchio M, Rosa AC, Dianzani C, et al. Modulation of the oxidative stress and inflammatory response by PPAR-gamma agonists in the hippocampus of rats exposed to cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;530(1–2):70–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lee WC, Wong HY, Chai YY, Shi CW, Amino N, Kikuchi S, et al. Lipid peroxidation dysregulation in ischemic stroke: plasma 4-HNE as a potential biomarker? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425(4):842–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dominguez C, Delgado P, Vilches A, Martin-Gallan P, Ribo M, Santamarina E, et al. Oxidative stress after thrombolysis-induced reperfusion in human stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(4):653–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lorenzano S, Rost NS, Khan M, Li H, Lima FO, Maas MB, et al. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers of Brain Damage: Hyperacute Plasma F2-Isoprostane Predicts Infarct Growth in Stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(3):630–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Castillo J, Rama R, Davalos A. Nitric oxide-related brain damage in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(4):852–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bernardo-Castro S, Sousa JA, Martins E, Donato H, Nunes C, d’Almeida OC, et al. The evolution of blood-brain barrier permeability changes after stroke and its implications on clinical outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2023;18(7):783–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Abo-Ramadan U, Durukan A, Pitkonen M, Marinkovic I, Tatlisumak E, Pedrono E, et al. Post-ischemic leakiness of the blood-brain barrier: a quantitative and systematic assessment by Patlak plots. Exp Neurol. 2009;219(1):328–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Maki T, Hayakawa K, Pham LD, Xing C, Lo EH, Arai K. Biphasic mechanisms of neurovascular unit injury and protection in CNS diseases. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2013;12(3):302–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rosenberg GA, Estrada EY, Dencoff JE. Matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs are associated with blood-brain barrier opening after reperfusion in rat brain. Stroke. 1998;29(10):2189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Strbian D, Durukan A, Pitkonen M, Marinkovic I, Tatlisumak E, Pedrono E, et al. The blood-brain barrier is continuously open for several weeks following transient focal cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience. 2008;153(1):175–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Witt KA, Mark KS, Sandoval KE, Davis TP. Reoxygenation stress on blood-brain barrier paracellular permeability and edema in the rat. Microvasc Res. 2008;75(1):91–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bernardo-Castro S, Sousa JA, Bras A, Cecilia C, Rodrigues B, Almendra L, et al. Pathophysiology of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Throughout the Different Stages of Ischemic Stroke and Its Implication on Hemorrhagic Transformation and Recovery. Front Neurol. 2020;11:594672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rao R Oxidative stress-induced disruption of epithelial and endothelial tight junctions. Front Biosci. 2008;13:7210–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kahles T, Luedike P, Endres M, Galla HJ, Steinmetz H, Busse R, et al. NADPH oxidase plays a central role in blood-brain barrier damage in experimental stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(11):3000–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.De Silva TM, Brait VH, Drummond GR, Sobey CG, Miller AA. Nox2 oxidase activity accounts for the oxidative stress and vasomotor dysfunction in mouse cerebral arteries following ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Casas AI, Geuss E, Kleikers PWM, Mencl S, Herrmann AM, Buendia I, et al. NOX4-dependent neuronal autotoxicity and BBB breakdown explain the superior sensitivity of the brain to ischemic damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(46):12315–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jackman KA, Miller AA, Drummond GR, Sobey CG. Importance of NOX1 for angiotensin II-induced cerebrovascular superoxide production and cortical infarct volume following ischemic stroke. Brain Res. 2009;1286:215–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kahles T, Kohnen A, Heumueller S, Rappert A, Bechmann I, Liebner S, et al. NADPH oxidase Nox1 contributes to ischemic injury in experimental stroke in mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;40(1):185–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Casas AI, Kleikers PW, Geuss E, Langhauser F, Adler T, Busch DH, et al. Calcium-dependent blood-brain barrier breakdown by NOX5 limits postreperfusion benefit in stroke. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(4):1772–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Karatas H, Cakir-Aktas C. 12/15 Lipoxygenase as a Therapeutic Target in Brain Disorders. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019;56(4):288–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Moskowitz MA, Kiwak KJ, Hekimian K, Levine L. Synthesis of compounds with properties of leukotrienes C4 and D4 in gerbil brains after ischemia and reperfusion. Science. 1984;224(4651):886–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jin G, Arai K, Murata Y, Wang S, Stins MF, Lo EH, et al. Protecting against cerebrovascular injury: contributions of 12/15-lipoxygenase to edema formation after transient focal ischemia. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2538–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cheng G, Zhao W, Xin Y, Huang G, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. Effects of ML351 and tissue plasminogen activator combination therapy in a rat model of focal embolic stroke. J Neurochem. 2021;157(3):586–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Fraser PA. The role of free radical generation in increasing cerebrovascular permeability. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(5):967–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Candelario-Jalil E, Gonzalez-Falcon A, Garcia-Cabrera M, Leon OS, Fiebich BL. Post-ischaemic treatment with the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor nimesulide reduces blood-brain barrier disruption and leukocyte infiltration following transient focal cerebral ischaemia in rats. J Neurochem. 2007;100(4):1108–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Martz D, Rayos G, Schielke GP, Betz AL. Allopurinol and dimethylthiourea reduce brain infarction following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Stroke. 1989;20(4):488–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Girouard H, Park L, Anrather J, Zhou P, Iadecola C. Cerebrovascular nitrosative stress mediates neurovascular and endothelial dysfunction induced by angiotensin II. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(2):303–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Leira EC, Planas AM, Chauhan AK, Chamorro A. Uric Acid: A Translational Journey in Cerebroprotection That Spanned Preclinical and Human Data. Neurology. 2023;101(23):1068–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lyden PD, Diniz MA, Bosetti F, Lamb J, Nagarkatti KA, Rogatko A, et al. A multi-laboratory preclinical trial in rodents to assess treatment candidates for acute ischemic stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(714):eadg8656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kimura Y, Tsukui D, Kono H. Uric Acid in Inflammation and the Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Matsuo Y, Onodera H, Shiga Y, Nakamura M, Ninomiya M, Kihara T, et al. Correlation between myeloperoxidase-quantified neutrophil accumulation and ischemic brain injury in the rat. Effects of neutrophil depletion. Stroke. 1994;25(7):1469–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Yu G, Liang Y, Huang Z, Jones DW, Pritchard KA Jr., Zhang H Erratum to: Inhibition of myeloperoxidase oxidant production by N-acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide reduces brain damage in a murine model of stroke. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ullen A, Singewald E, Konya V, Fauler G, Reicher H, Nusshold C, et al. Myeloperoxidase-derived oxidants induce blood-brain barrier dysfunction in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yadav SK, Soin D, Ito K, Dhib-Jalbut S. Insight into the mechanism of action of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis. J Mol Med (Berl). 2019;97(4):463–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu L, Vollmer MK, Ahmad AS, Fernandez VM, Kim H, Dore S. Pretreatment with Korean red ginseng or dimethyl fumarate attenuates reactive gliosis and confers sustained neuroprotection against cerebral hypoxic-ischemic damage by an Nrf2-dependent mechanism. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;131:98–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kunze R, Urrutia A, Hoffmann A, Liu H, Helluy X, Pham M, et al. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates cerebral edema formation by protecting the blood-brain barrier integrity. Exp Neurol. 2015;266:99–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Iadecola C, Zhang F, Xu S, Casey R, Ross ME. Inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression in brain following cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1995;15(3):378–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Leker RR, Teichner A, Ovadia H, Keshet E, Reinherz E, Ben-Hur T. Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the ischemic penumbra: relationship to expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase and vascular endothelial growth factor. Brain Res. 2001;909(1–2):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Huang Z, Huang PL, Ma J, Meng W, Ayata C, Fishman MC, et al. Enlarged infarcts in endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout mice are attenuated by nitro-L-arginine. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16(5):981–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Huang Z, Huang PL, Panahian N, Dalkara T, Fishman MC, Moskowitz MA. Effects of cerebral ischemia in mice deficient in neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Science. 1994;265(5180):1883–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Iadecola C, Zhang F, Casey R, Nagayama M, Ross ME. Delayed reduction of ischemic brain injury and neurological deficits in mice lacking the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. J Neurosci. 1997;17(23):9157–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Iadecola C, Zhang F, Xu X. Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates cerebral ischemic damage. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(1 Pt 2):R286–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mohammadi MT, Shid-Moosavi SM, Dehghani GA. Contribution of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in blood-brain barrier disruption during acute focal cerebral ischemia in normal rat. Pathophysiology. 2012;19(1):13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gu Z, Kaul M, Yan B, Kridel SJ, Cui J, Strongin A, et al. S-nitrosylation of matrix metalloproteinases: signaling pathway to neuronal cell death. Science. 2002;297(5584):1186–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Suofu Y, Clark J, Broderick J, Wagner KR, Tomsick T, Sa Y, et al. Peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst prevents matrix metalloproteinase activation and neurovascular injury after prolonged cerebral ischemia in rats. J Neurochem. 2010;115(5):1266–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Jian Liu K, Rosenberg GA. Matrix metalloproteinases and free radicals in cerebral ischemia. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005;39(1):71–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Cortez DM, Feldman MD, Mummidi S, Valente AJ, Steffensen B, Vincenti M, et al. IL-17 stimulates MMP-1 expression in primary human cardiac fibroblasts via p38 MAPK- and ERK1/2-dependent C/EBP-beta , NF-kappaB, and AP-1 activation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(6):H3356–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Asahi M, Wang X, Mori T, Sumii T, Jung JC, Moskowitz MA, et al. Effects of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out on the proteolysis of blood-brain barrier and white matter components after cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci. 2001;21(19):7724–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Maier CM, Hsieh L, Crandall T, Narasimhan P, Chan PH. Evaluating therapeutic targets for reperfusion-related brain hemorrhage. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(6):929–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Yang Y, Estrada EY, Thompson JF, Liu W, Rosenberg GA. Matrix metalloproteinase-mediated disruption of tight junction proteins in cerebral vessels is reversed by synthetic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in focal ischemia in rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(4):697–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Gu Y, Zheng G, Xu M, Li Y, Chen X, Zhu W, et al. Caveolin-1 regulates nitric oxide-mediated matrix metalloproteinases activity and blood-brain barrier permeability in focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury. J Neurochem. 2012;120(1):147–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kamada H, Yu F, Nito C, Chan PH. Influence of hyperglycemia on oxidative stress and matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation after focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in rats: relation to blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1044–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Suzuki Y, Nagai N, Umemura K, Collen D, Lijnen HR. Stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) is critical for intracranial bleeding after t-PA treatment of stroke in mice. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(8):1732–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yagi K, Kitazato KT, Uno M, Tada Y, Kinouchi T, Shimada K, et al. Edaravone, a free radical scavenger, inhibits MMP-9-related brain hemorrhage in rats treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2009;40(2):626–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Asahi M, Asahi K, Wang X, Lo EH. Reduction of tissue plasminogen activator-induced hemorrhage and brain injury by free radical spin trapping after embolic focal cerebral ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20(3):452–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Jiang X, Andjelkovic AV, Zhu L, Yang T, Bennett MVL, Chen J, et al. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction and recovery after ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2018;163–164:144–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lochhead JJ, McCaffrey G, Quigley CE, Finch J, DeMarco KM, Nametz N, et al. Oxidative stress increases blood-brain barrier permeability and induces alterations in occludin during hypoxia-reoxygenation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30(9):1625–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Mark KS, Burroughs AR, Brown RC, Huber JD, Davis TP. Nitric oxide mediates hypoxia-induced changes in paracellular permeability of cerebral microvasculature. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286(1):H174–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Jiao H, Wang Z, Liu Y, Wang P, Xue Y. Specific role of tight junction proteins claudin-5, occludin, and ZO-1 of the blood-brain barrier in a focal cerebral ischemic insult. J Mol Neurosci. 2011;44(2):130–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Liu P, Zhang R, Liu D, Wang J, Yuan C, Zhao X, et al. Time-course investigation of blood-brain barrier permeability and tight junction protein changes in a rat model of permanent focal ischemia. J Physiol Sci. 2018;68(2):121–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Choi KH, Kim HS, Park MS, Kim JT, Kim JH, Cho KA, et al. Regulation of Caveolin-1 Expression Determines Early Brain Edema After Experimental Focal Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke. 2016;47(5):1336–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Ishrat T, Sayeed I, Atif F, Hua F, Stein DG. Progesterone and allopregnanolone attenuate blood-brain barrier dysfunction following permanent focal ischemia by regulating the expression of matrix metalloproteinases. Exp Neurol. 2010;226(1):183–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.McColl BW, Rothwell NJ, Allan SM. Systemic inflammation alters the kinetics of cerebrovascular tight junction disruption after experimental stroke in mice. J Neurosci. 2008;28(38):9451–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Winkler L, Blasig R, Breitkreuz-Korff O, Berndt P, Dithmer S, Helms HC, et al. Tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier promote edema formation and infarct size in stroke - Ambivalent effects of sealing proteins. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41(1):132–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.De Bock M, Van Haver V, Vandenbroucke RE, Decrock E, Wang N, Leybaert L. Into rather unexplored terrain-transcellular transport across the blood-brain barrier. Glia. 2016;64(7):1097–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Knowland D, Arac A, Sekiguchi KJ, Hsu M, Lutz SE, Perrino J, et al. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron. 2014;82(3):603–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Krueger M, Bechmann I, Immig K, Reichenbach A, Hartig W, Michalski D. Blood-brain barrier breakdown involves four distinct stages of vascular damage in various models of experimental focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(2):292–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Krueger M, Hartig W, Reichenbach A, Bechmann I, Michalski D. Blood-brain barrier breakdown after embolic stroke in rats occurs without ultrastructural evidence for disrupting tight junctions. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Aoki M, Nata T, Morishita R, Matsushita H, Nakagami H, Yamamoto K, et al. Endothelial apoptosis induced by oxidative stress through activation of NF-kappaB: antiapoptotic effect of antioxidant agents on endothelial cells. Hypertension. 2001;38(1):48–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Burlacu A, Jinga V, Gafencu AV, Simionescu M. Severity of oxidative stress generates different mechanisms of endothelial cell death. Cell Tissue Res. 2001;306(3):409–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zheng D, Liu J, Piao H, Zhu Z, Wei R, Liu K. ROS-triggered endothelial cell death mechanisms: Focus on pyroptosis, parthanatos, and ferroptosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1039241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhou H, Liu X, Liu L, Yang Z, Zhang S, Tang M, et al. Oxidative stress and apoptosis of human brain microvascular endothelial cells induced by free fatty acids. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(6):1897–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Kondo T, Reaume AG, Huang TT, Carlson E, Murakami K, Chen SF, et al. Reduction of CuZn-superoxide dismutase activity exacerbates neuronal cell injury and edema formation after transient focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci. 1997;17(11):4180–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Nito C, Kamada H, Endo H, Niizuma K, Myer DJ, Chan PH. Role of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/cytosolic phospholipase A2 signaling pathway in blood-brain barrier disruption after focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(10):1686–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Weisbrot-Lefkowitz M, Reuhl K, Perry B, Chan PH, Inouye M, Mirochnitchenko O. Overexpression of human glutathione peroxidase protects transgenic mice against focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion damage. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998;53(1–2):333–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Ishibashi N, Prokopenko O, Weisbrot-Lefkowitz M, Reuhl KR, Mirochnitchenko O. Glutathione peroxidase inhibits cell death and glial activation following experimental stroke. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2002;109(1–2):34–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Yeh WL, Lin CJ, Fu WM. Enhancement of glucose transporter expression of brain endothelial cells by vascular endothelial growth factor derived from glioma exposed to hypoxia. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73(1):170–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Shah KK, Boreddy PR, Abbruscato TJ. Nicotine pre-exposure reduces stroke-induced glucose transporter-1 activity at the blood-brain barrier in mice. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2015;12:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Elfeber K, Kohler A, Lutzenburg M, Osswald C, Galla HJ, Witte OW, et al. Localization of the Na+-D-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 in the blood-brain barrier. Histochem Cell Biol. 2004;121(3):201–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Vemula S, Roder KE, Yang T, Bhat GJ, Thekkumkara TJ, Abbruscato TJ. A functional role for sodium-dependent glucose transport across the blood-brain barrier during oxygen glucose deprivation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;328(2):487–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Stanton JA, Williams EI, Betterton RD, Davis TP, Ronaldson PT. Targeting organic cation transporters at the blood-brain barrier to treat ischemic stroke in rats. Exp Neurol. 2022;357:114181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Williams EI, Betterton RD, Stanton JA, Moreno-Rodriguez VM, Lochhead JJ, Davis TP, et al. Oatp (Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide)-Mediated Transport: A Mechanism for Atorvastatin Neuroprotection in Stroke. Stroke. 2023;54(11):2875–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Ronaldson PT, Williams EI, Betterton RD, Stanton JA, Nilles KL, Davis TP. CNS Drug Delivery in Stroke: Improving Therapeutic Translation From the Bench to the Bedside. Stroke. 2024;55(1):190–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Wallace BK, Foroutan S, O’Donnell ME. Ischemia-induced stimulation of Na-K-Cl cotransport in cerebral microvascular endothelial cells involves AMP kinase. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;301(2):C316–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Lam TI, Wise PM, O’Donnell ME. Cerebral microvascular endothelial cell Na/H exchange: evidence for the presence of NHE1 and NHE2 isoforms and regulation by arginine vasopressin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009;297(2):C278–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hom S, Fleegal MA, Egleton RD, Campos CR, Hawkins BT, Davis TP. Comparative changes in the blood-brain barrier and cerebral infarction of SHR and WKY rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292(5):R1881–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Chen YJ, Wallace BK, Yuen N, Jenkins DP, Wulff H, O’Donnell ME. Blood-brain barrier KCa3.1 channels: evidence for a role in brain Na uptake and edema in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46(1):237–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Spudich A, Kilic E, Xing H, Kilic U, Rentsch KM, Wunderli-Allenspach H, et al. Inhibition of multidrug resistance transporter-1 facilitates neuroprotective therapies after focal cerebral ischemia. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(4):487–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.DeMars KM, Yang C, Hawkins KE, McCrea AO, Siwarski DM, Candelario-Jalil E. Spatiotemporal Changes in P-glycoprotein Levels in Brain and Peripheral Tissues Following Ischemic Stroke in Rats. J Exp Neurosci. 2017;11:1179069517701741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Zhang J, Zhang M, Sun B, Li Y, Xu P, Liu C, et al. Hyperammonemia enhances the function and expression of P-glycoprotein and Mrp2 at the blood-brain barrier through NF-kappaB. J Neurochem. 2014;131(6):791–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hoshi Y, Uchida Y, Tachikawa M, Ohtsuki S, Couraud PO, Suzuki T, et al. Oxidative stress-induced activation of Abl and Src kinases rapidly induces P-glycoprotein internalization via phosphorylation of caveolin-1 on tyrosine-14, decreasing cortisol efflux at the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40(2):420–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Chen X, Zhou ZW, Xue CC, Li XX, Zhou SF. Role of P-glycoprotein in restricting the brain penetration of tanshinone IIA, a major active constituent from the root of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, across the blood-brain barrier. Xenobiotica. 2007;37(6):635–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ronaldson PT, Brzica H, Abdullahi W, Reilly BG, Davis TP. Transport Properties of Statins by Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1A2 and Regulation by Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling in Human Endothelial Cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021;376(2):148–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Betterton RD, Abdullahi W, Williams EI, Lochhead JJ, Brzica H, Stanton J, et al. Regulation of Blood-Brain Barrier Transporters by Transforming Growth Factor-beta/Activin Receptor-Like Kinase 1 Signaling: Relevance to the Brain Disposition of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors (i.e., Statins). Drug Metab Dispos. 2022;50(7):942–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A, 3rd, Goldstein LB, Hennerici M, Rudolph AE, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):549–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Bauer M, Karch R, Zeitlinger M, Philippe C, Romermann K, Stanek J, et al. Approaching complete inhibition of P-glycoprotein at the human blood-brain barrier: an (R)-[11C]verapamil PET study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(5):743–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Palmeira A, Sousa E, Vasconcelos MH, Pinto MM. Three decades of P-gp inhibitors: skimming through several generations and scaffolds. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(13):1946–2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Binkhathlan Z, Lavasanifar A. P-glycoprotein inhibition as a therapeutic approach for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer: current status and future perspectives. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(3):326–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Polli JW, Olson KL, Chism JP, John-Williams LS, Yeager RL, Woodard SM, et al. An unexpected synergist role of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein on the central nervous system penetration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib (N-3-chloro-4-[(3-fluorobenzyl)oxy]phenyl-6-[5-([2-(methylsulfonyl)ethyl]aminomethyl)-2-furyl]-4-quinazolinamine; GW572016). Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37(2):439–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Billington S, Salphati L, Hop C, Chu X, Evers R, Burdette D, et al. Interindividual and Regional Variability in Drug Transporter Abundance at the Human Blood-Brain Barrier Measured by Quantitative Targeted Proteomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;106(1):228–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Robey RW, To KK, Polgar O, Dohse M, Fetsch P, Dean M, et al. ABCG2: a perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(1):3–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Tornabene E, Helms HCC, Pedersen SF, Brodin B. Effects of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) on barrier properties and mRNA transcript levels of selected marker proteins in brain endothelial cells/astrocyte co-cultures. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Ji Y, Morris ME. Membrane transport of dietary phenethyl isothiocyanate by ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein). Mol Pharm. 2005;2(5):414–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Ibbotson K, Yell J, Ronaldson PT. Nrf2 signaling increases expression of ATP-binding cassette subfamily C mRNA transcripts at the blood-brain barrier following hypoxia-reoxygenation stress. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2017;14(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Ghanem CI, Rudraiah S, Bataille AM, Vigo MB, Goedken MJ, Manautou JE. Role of nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in the transcriptional regulation of brain ABC transporters during acute acetaminophen (APAP) intoxication in mice. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;94(3):203–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Ronaldson PT, Bendayan R. HIV-1 viral envelope glycoprotein gp120 produces oxidative stress and regulates the functional expression of multidrug resistance protein-1 (Mrp1) in glial cells. J Neurochem. 2008;106(3):1298–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Ronaldson PT, Ashraf T, Bendayan R. Regulation of multidrug resistance protein 1 by tumor necrosis factor alpha in cultured glial cells: involvement of nuclear factor-kappaB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathways. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;77(4):644–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Hohnholt MC, Dringen R. Short time exposure to hydrogen peroxide induces sustained glutathione export from cultured neurons. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;70:33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Dohare P, Hyzinski-Garcia MC, Vipani A, Bowens NH, Nalwalk JW, Feustel PJ, et al. The neuroprotective properties of the superoxide dismutase mimetic tempol correlate with its ability to reduce pathological glutamate release in a rodent model of stroke. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;77:168–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Miyamoto N, Pham LD, Maki T, Liang AC, Arai K. A radical scavenger edaravone inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-9 upregulation and blood-brain barrier breakdown in a mouse model of prolonged cerebral hypoperfusion. Neurosci Lett. 2014;573:40–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Amemiya S, Kamiya T, Nito C, Inaba T, Kato K, Ueda M, et al. Anti-apoptotic and neuroprotective effects of edaravone following transient focal ischemia in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;516(2):125–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Aoki J, Kimura K, Morita N, Harada M, Metoki N, Tateishi Y, et al. YAMATO Study (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and Edaravone Combination Therapy). Stroke. 2017;48(3):712–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Edaravone Acute Infarction Study G. Effect of a novel free radical scavenger, edaravone (MCI-186), on acute brain infarction. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study at multicenters. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15(3):222–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Imai K, Mori T, Izumoto H, Takabatake N, Kunieda T, Watanabe M. Hyperbaric oxygen combined with intravenous edaravone for treatment of acute embolic stroke: a pilot clinical trial. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006;46(8):373–8; discussion 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Kaste M, Murayama S, Ford GA, Dippel DW, Walters MR, Tatlisumak T, et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of MCI-186 in patients with acute ischemic stroke: new formulation and dosing regimen. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(3):196–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kimura K, Aoki J, Sakamoto Y, Kobayashi K, Sakai K, Inoue T, et al. Administration of edaravone, a free radical scavenger, during t-PA infusion can enhance early recanalization in acute stroke patients--a preliminary study. J Neurol Sci. 2012;313(1–2):132–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Mitta M, Goel D, Bansal KK, Puri P. Edaravone - citicoline comparative study in acute ischemic stroke (ECCS-AIS). J Assoc Physicians India. 2012;60:36–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Nakase T, Yoshioka S, Suzuki A. Free radical scavenger, edaravone, reduces the lesion size of lacunar infarction in human brain ischemic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Shinohara Y, Saito I, Kobayashi S, Uchiyama S. Edaravone (radical scavenger) versus sodium ozagrel (antiplatelet agent) in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (EDO trial). Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(5):485–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Zheng J, Chen X. Edaravone offers neuroprotection for acute diabetic stroke patients. Ir J Med Sci. 2016;185(4):819–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Fidalgo M, Ricardo Pires J, Viseu I, Magalhaes P, Gregorio H, Afreixo V, et al. Edaravone for acute ischemic stroke - Systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;219:107299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Zhao K, Li GZ, Nie LY, Ye XM, Zhu GY. Edaravone for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2022;44(12):e29–e38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Imai H, Graham DI, Masayasu H, Macrae IM. Antioxidant ebselen reduces oxidative damage in focal cerebral ischemia. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003;34(1):56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Imai H, Masayasu H, Dewar D, Graham DI, Macrae IM. Ebselen protects both gray and white matter in a rodent model of focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2001;32(9):2149–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Namura S, Nagata I, Takami S, Masayasu H, Kikuchi H. Ebselen reduces cytochrome c release from mitochondria and subsequent DNA fragmentation after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Stroke. 2001;32(8):1906–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Ogawa A, Yoshimoto T, Kikuchi H, Sano K, Saito I, Yamaguchi T, et al. Ebselen in acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9(2):112–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Yamaguchi T, Sano K, Takakura K, Saito I, Shinohara Y, Asano T, et al. Ebselen in acute ischemic stroke: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Ebselen Study Group. Stroke. 1998;29(1):12–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Kavanagh RJ, Kam PC. Lazaroids: efficacy and mechanism of action of the 21-aminosteroids in neuroprotection. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86(1):110–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Bath PM, Iddenden R, Bath FJ, Orgogozo JM, Tirilazad International Steering C. Tirilazad for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD002087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Sena E, Wheble P, Sandercock P, Macleod M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of tirilazad in experimental stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(2):388–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Bath PM, Gray LJ, Bath AJ, Buchan A, Miyata T, Green AR, et al. Effects of NXY-059 in experimental stroke: an individual animal meta-analysis. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157(7):1157–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Diener HC, Lees KR, Lyden P, Grotta J, Davalos A, Davis SM, et al. NXY-059 for the treatment of acute stroke: pooled analysis of the SAINT I and II Trials. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1751–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Green AR, Lanbeck-Vallen K, Ashwood T, Lundquist S, Lindstrom Boo E, Jonasson H, et al. Brain penetration of the novel free radical trapping neuroprotectant NXY-059 in rats subjected to permanent focal ischemia. Brain Res. 2006;1072(1):224–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Macleod MR, van der Worp HB, Sena ES, Howells DW, Dirnagl U, Donnan GA. Evidence for the efficacy of NXY-059 in experimental focal cerebral ischaemia is confounded by study quality. Stroke. 2008;39(10):2824–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES