Abstract
There are limited options for primary prevention of breast cancer (BC). Experimental procedures to locally prevent BC have shown therapeutic efficacy in animal models. To determine the suitability of FDA-approved iodine-containing and various metal-containing (bismuth, gold, iodine, or tantalum) preclinical nanoparticle-based contrast agents for image-guided intraductal (ID) ablative treatment of BC in rodent models, we performed a prospective longitudinal study to determine the imaging performance, local retention and systemic clearance, safety profile, and compatibility with ablative solution of each contrast agent. At least six abdominal mammary glands (>3 female FVB/JN mice and/or Sprague-Dawley rats, 10–11 weeks of age) were intraductally injected with commercially available contrast agents (Omnipaque® 300, Fenestra® VC, MVivoTM Au, MVivoTM BIS) or in-house synthesized tantalum oxide (TaOx) nanoparticles. Contrast agents were administered at stock concentration or diluted in 70% ethanol (EtOH) and up to 1% ethyl cellulose (EC) as gelling agent to assess their compatibility with our image-guided ablative procedure. Mammary glands were serially imaged by microCT for up to 60 days after ID delivery. Imaging data were analyzed by radiologists and deep learning to measure in vivo signal disappearance of contrast agents. Mammary glands and major organs were ultimately collected for histopathological examination. TaOx-containing solutions provided best imaging performance for nitid visualization of ductal tree immediately after infusion, low outward diffusion (<1 day) and high homogeneity. Of all nanoparticles, TaOx had the highest local clearance rate (46% signal decay as stock and 36% as ablative solution 3 days after ID injection) and exhibited low toxicity. TaOx-containing ablative solution with 1% EC caused same percentage of epithelial cell death (88.62% ± 7.70% vs. 76.38% ± 9.99%, p value = 0.089) with similar minimal collateral damage (21.56 ± 5.28% vs. 21.50% ± 7.14%, p value = 0.98) in mouse and rat mammary glands, respectively. In conclusion, TaOx-nanoparticles are a suitable and versatile contrast agent for intraductal imaging and image-guided ablative procedures in rodent models of BC with translational potential to humans.
INTRODUCTION
Breast cancer (BC) has the highest cancer diagnosis rate among women within the United States and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths1. Although there are many FDA approved treatments for BC patients, the estimated death rate among women has remained stagnant for the past 22 years1. Currently, only two FDA-approved options aid in BC prevention: prophylactic mastectomy and hormone therapy2. The severe side effects deter many of the eligible women from choosing these interventions3. Therefore, there is a need to develop new strategies of prevention for high-risk individuals that will also benefit women at moderate or low risk for BC.
Intraductal injection (ID) can be used clinically for ductography imaging to establish differential diagnosis of nipple discharge with minimal discomfort4,5. ID injection is a novel strategy for BC prevention and local treatment6,7 that has shown promise in preclinical animal models8–22. We have repurposed the procedure of ID injections for BC prevention by infusing a cell-killing solution in rodent models8–12, thereby locally targeting epithelial cells from which BC (carcinoma) arises. We previously demonstrated the feasibility of ID delivery with 70% ethanol (EtOH) as an inexpensive, readily available, cell-killing chemical solution in rodent models8–12. Our previous study showed therapeutic efficacy of single ID injection of 70% EtOH for preventing BC formation in the aggressive C3(1)-TAg mouse model8. As EtOH is already used clinically as an ablative agent for local cancer treatments, these findings position ID injections of 70% EtOH as a promising procedure10,11 to investigate in future first-in-human trials for BC prevention of at-risk individuals.
Fluoroscopy and computerized tomography (CT) are clinical imaging modalities that could be used to monitor this ablative procedure for intended application of BC risk reduction in future clinical trials. These techniques are enhanced by contrast agents that attenuate X-rays giving rise to an imaging signal23. We seek to introduce a radiopaque contrast agent into our ablative solution for real-time visualization (e.g., fluoroscopy) and image guidance of complete filling of the ductal tree in animal models. MicroCT is a rapid, high-resolution imaging modality that can visualize full anatomy of the breast in animal models in 3D24. Several metallic nanoparticle based X-ray contrast agents have been formulated with small nanoparticle size and high radiopacity (reviewed in ref. 25). We recently developed tantalum oxide (TaOx) nanoparticles as an novel X-ray contrast agent for CT9. TaOx nanoparticles have higher radiopacity than iodine at clinical X-ray energies and low toxicity with slower outward diffusion from the ductal tree of rodent models8–11 than FDA-approved iodine-based contrast agents (e.g., Isovue-300) used in clinical ductography. Here, we systematically and comprehensively compared the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of several commercially available (iodine-, gold-, and bismuth-containing) X-ray contrast agents against TaOx nanoparticles when infused intraductally with the 70% EtOH ablative solution. We set the following criteria to objectively identify suitable contrast agent for image guidance of this investigational ablative procedure: (1) minimal diffusion within 8 h of infusion to have a nitid visualization and assess complete filling of the ductal tree immediately after injection; (2) high local clearance by 3 days, so that contrast agent does not interfere with future imaging sessions (CT and/or MRI) assessing anatomical changes of treated mammary gland; (3) low local and systemic toxicity; and (4) compatibility with ablative agent (70% EtOH) to maximize epithelial cell killing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Contrast agent preparation
All X-ray contrast agents were used as commercially supplied. Hydrophilic TaOx nanoparticles were synthesized as described9. For all contrast reagents except TaOx nanoparticles (NPs), injection solution was either “stock” as supplied by the manufacturer with no dilution, or three parts stock solution with 7 parts 200 proof EtOH to yield 70% EtOH in the solution: Omnipaque® 300 (GE Healthcare, #00407141363, 300 mg I/ml), Fenestra® VC (MedLumine, VC-131, <200 nm particles pegylated emulsion, 50 mg I/ml), MVivo™ Au (MedLumine, Au-315, 15 ± 2 nm particles, 200 mg Au/ml), MVivo™ BIS (MedLumine, BIS-11, 250 nm nanoparticles, 150 Bi mg/ml). TaOx (11.1 ± 1 nm particles) was supplied in lyophilized form as described9, which allowed for the 70% EtOH solution to contain half the concentration of the “stock” solution rather than 30% as with manufactured contrast agents (specifically 36 mg Ta/ml in “stock” versus 18 mg Ta/ml in 70% EtOH). Ethyl cellulose (Acros Organics, 9004-57-3) was added up to 1% (w/v) to 70% EtOH solution containing 18 mg Ta/ml of TaOx.
microCT image acquisition and analysis
All experiments were conducted under protocols approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Michigan State University. Ten-week-old female FVB/JN mice (n = 3–5/solution; jax.org stock 001800) and 11-week-old female Sprague Dawley rats (n = 3–4/solution; envigo.com order code 002) were prepared and ID injected as described10,11. Serial images of infused ductal trees were acquired at different time points post-injection using a PerkinElmer Quantum GX microCT scanner; for short-term study: 0, 30 min, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h (Figs. 1 and S1) and for long-term study: 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 30 and 60 days (Figs. 3, 4 and S2). The following image acquisition scan parameters were standardized and used at each scan interval time point in mice: 90 kVp/88 μA; field of view (FOV), 36 mm; number of slices, 512; slice thickness, 72 μm; voxel resolution, 72 μm3; and in rats: 90 kVp/88 μA; FOV, 72 mm; number of slices, 512; slice thickness, 72 μm; voxel resolution, 144 μm3. Radiation exposure was minimized in these serial imaging studies by acquisition of standard (2 min) scans. Caliper AnalyzeDirect©, v12.0 (Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) was used for microCT image rendering, segmentation, and analysis of individual glands or tissue phantoms (0.2 ml PCR tubes with contrast solutions) as described10,11.
microCT deep learning analysis
A deep learning algorithm consisting of a convolutional neural network (CNN) with UNET architecture was used for automated segmentation and analysis of the microCT images. Two clinical radiologists (A.L, P.W.) and an imaging specialist (H.H.) generated full volume segmentation masks for 12 image volumes consisting of 256 slices each via the ITK-snap software. The model consisted of feature extraction, flattening and regression layers, taking the preprocessed image as input. The model was trained using individual 2D slices and corresponding radiologist generated masks from each image volume, which rendered a total dataset size of 3072 slices used for initial training of the algorithm. Preprocessed image slices of dimensions [x, y] = [256, 512] were input into the algorithm for training with a batch size = 32, epoch = 100 iterations and a learning rate α = 10−4 using the Adam optimizer. Loss per iteration was calculated using standard gradient descent loss algorithm26. A 5-fold cross-validation method was used for training such that 80% of the data was used as a training set and 20% of the data was used for internal validation of algorithm performance. The resulting image segmentations were then used for ROI analysis of mammary gland contrast content using average HU values rendered from each gland bilaterally. For adequate transformation of pixel values to standard Hounsfield units (HU), the inference script used SimpleITK for rendering of the original image and resulting segmentation output from the algorithm after thresholding the original image using the ROI prediction mask. The inference script did not threshold images at a specified HU value.
Histological analysis
Animals were euthanized immediately after last scan in serial microCT imaging (for short term study 8 h after and for long term study 60 days after injections). Dissected mammary glands were processed and embedded in paraffin after 24 h fixation in formalin as described27. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples (4 μm) were scanned on an Aperio Versa 8 Brightfield&Fluorescence imaging system (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) following H&E staining. Annotation and quantitative analysis were performed using ImageScope tools as described8.
Statistical analysis
Unpaired Welch’s t-tests were used to assess statistical significance of difference of continuous values obtained from imaging and tissue analyses between experimental groups and a reference control group. GraphPad Prism 9 was used to perform these statistical analyses. We set a p value of 0.01 as the threshold to report statistical significance.
RESULTS
TaOx enables better imaging of rodent ductal tree architecture as compared to FDA approved Omnipaque
We conducted a short-term serial imaging study to characterize retention of Omnipaque and TaOx within the ductal tree. We injected 40 μl of Omnipaque or TaOx in PBS (300 mg I/ml and 18 mg Ta/ml, respectively) or 70% EtOH (90 mg I/ml and 18 mg Ta/ml respectively) in the abdominal mammary glands of FVB mice. Animals were imaged by microCT immediately and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post injections (Fig. 1A). Stock Omnipaque was detected at all time points, but rapidly diffused outside the ductal tree, flooding the mammary fat pad and reaching the fascia (Figs. 1A, B and S1). After local clearance, residual Omnipaque was retained within the ductal tree enabling nitid visualization of its overall structure from 1 to 8 h after injections. Omnipaque diluted in 70% EtOH had minimal retention in the ductal tree and was undetectable 1 h after injections (Figs. 1B and S1). However, TaOx remained within the ductal tree with little clearance and had extended ductal tree branching within the 8-h time frame in both stock PBS solution and 70% EtOH (Figs. 1A, B and S1). Most importantly, TaOx enables nitid visualization of the ductal tree immediately after infusion with 70% EtOH ablative solution, which is a required feature for intended image guidance application to assess complete filling of the ductal tree. Together, these demonstrate TaOx has superior local retention and imaging capabilities as compared to Omnipaque.
In vitro and in vivo comparison of TaOx with commercially available CT contrast agents
To ensure that all contrast agents could be visualized by microCT imaging at the injectable range, stock solutions of each agent were serially diluted in PBS or 70% EtOH (Fig. 2). Omnipaque and Mvivo Au dilutions had the highest signal intensity, though all contrast agents produce adequate signal. EtOH did not interfere with signal detection or homogeneity of any of the contrast agent, except for MVivo BIS (Fig. 2B, C). Qualitatively, MVivo BIS signal was heterogenous in tissue phantom. Quantitatively, linear fitting of MVivo signal was poor in PBS (R2 = 0.59 compared to other contrast agents R2 > 0.96) and in 70% EtOH (R2 = 0.68 compared to other contrast agents R2 > 0.91). Commercial contrast agents were provided at stock concentration ready to inject intravenously in animals. Therefore, the addition of EtOH resulted in lowered concentration of each contrast agents to 30% of maximal concentration, except for TaOx nanoparticles that can be reconstituted to up to 60 mg Ta/ml in either PBS or 70% EtOH (Fig. S2). As expected, stronger signal can be observed in infused ductal tree with stock solution rather than EtOH. The decrease of signal intensity of all contrast agents is proportional and consistent with observations in tissue phantoms, except for MVivo BIS (Fig. 2B, C). As observed in tissue phantoms, MVivo BIS signal was inconsistent and heterogeneous within the ductal tree. Moreover, viscous, aggregation-prone MVivo BIS solutions difficulted a steady continuous infusion of cannulated nipples.
From the short-term serial imaging study (Fig. 1), we determined that the time point immediately after injection was crucial for the ability of a contrast agent to serve in image guidance application of this ablative procedure. To assess imaging performance of all contrast agents for initial visualization of the ductal tree, we generated 3D reconstructions of the infused ductal trees from segmented images of the mammary gland structures (fat pad/fascia boundary) (Fig. 2A). Omnipaque and Mvivo Au solutions rapidly diffused outside the ductal tree and flooded mammary gland stroma as inferred by the oversaturation and lack of defined ductal tree structure (Figs. 3, 4 and S2). Leaked contrast agent can be easily appreciated as it markedly outlines the mammary gland fascia boundary on single-slice microCT images (Fig. 2B) and a solid wall on 3D reconstructions (Figs. 3 and 4). Fenestra VC and TaOx solutions were predominantly retained within the filled ductal tree enabling informative visualization of the overall ductal tree structure (Figs. 2C, 3, 4 and S2). Compared to TaOx, the ductal tree in Fenestra VC-infused animals was equivocal and not as defined, especially in stock solution, due to local leakage outside the tree and heterogenous distribution of the solution (e.g., air bubbles) (Figs. 2C, 3, 4 and S2).
Local retention and long-term imaging of residual contrast agents
To study the long-term effects of local retention and systemic clearance of each contrast agent, we conducted a 60-day serial imaging study. Mice were ID infused with 40 μl of stock solutions or contrast agent in 70% EtOH into the abdominal mammary glands. Animals were imaged by microCT at days 1, 3, 7, 14, 30 and 60 after injections (Figs. 3, 4 and S2). We generated 3D reconstructions of the lower body to determine how contrast agents distributed systemically. We did not detect signal for any contrast agents in major organs (kidney, lung, liver, spleen) (Fig. S2). Mvivo Au solutions accumulated subcutaneously (Fig. S2). Subcutaneous accumulation was occasionally observed in animals infused with TaOx (1 out of 15 animals) or Fenestra VC (1 out of 7) stock solutions (Fig. S2). We generated 3D reconstructions of the infused ductal trees from segmented images of the mammary gland structure (fat pad/fascia boundary). As expected after day 1, Omnipaque-infused animals had little signal retention in the mammary gland compared to the other contrast agents (Figs. 3 and 4). Mvivo Au, TaOx, and Fenestra VC remained within the ductal tree for 60 days to varying degrees (Figs. 3 and 4), except for Mvivo Au in 70% EtOH which was undetectable after 7 days (Fig. 4). Fenestra VC in 70% EtOH appeared to aggregate during the active process of wound healing, hampering local clearance (Fig. 3). Further study will be needed to understand if this aggregation is a macrophage-mediated process or another foreign object clearance mechanism is at work. The faster clearance and low immunogenicity of TaOx is a desirable feature to minimize long-term toxicity and facilitate follow-up procedures.
AI-assisted quantitative metrics of contrast agent signal decay
To obtain systematic and quantitative metrics of signal decay over time, we developed a Deep Learning (DL)-based AI algorithm for automated segmentation of mammary gland and extraction of HU values from region of interest (Fig. 5A). We applied this DL algorithm for image analysis of data filles obtained from short-term study (Fig. 1) and long-term study (Figs. 3 and 4). Omnipaque signal was less than 15% of maximum signal in either stock or 70% EtOH after 1 h of injection (Fig. 5B) and signal was less than 5% after 1 day and undetectable after 3 days (Fig. 5C). TaOx signal remained above 60% of maximum both in stock and 70% EtOH solution after 8 h of injections (Fig. 5B). After 1 day of injections, TaOx signal was less than 40% of maximum and exhibited more rapid local clearance than the other nanoparticle-based contrast agents, except for MVivo Au in 70% EtOH (Fig. 5C). TaOx signal was less than 20% of maximum by 60 days after injections. Comparatively, Mvivo Bis signal declined more slowly during the first 30 days after injections, but precipitously declined to less than 10% by 60 days (Fig. 5C). Unlike other contrast agents, Fenestra VC signal in 70% EtOH declined much slower than in stock solution and almost 50% of signal remained 60 days after injections (Fig. 5C).
Ductal ablation, systemic accumulation and toxicity of TaOx and other contrast agents
To ensure the safety of the contrast agents for application in the ablative procedure, we next looked at local and systemic toxicity of each contrast agent alone or in combination with 70% EtOH. Tissues from mammary glands and major organs (heart, lung, spleen, liver, and kidney) were collected immediately after last imaging session 60 days after injections. For all contrast agents, we observed healthy, nucleated epithelial cells with intact surrounding adipose tissue in H&E stained mammary glands (Fig. 6A). A mild foreign body reaction with periductal fibrosis was observed in MVivo Au- and TaOx-infused ductal trees; a stronger foreign body reaction with periductal fibrosis and inflammation as well as intraductal histocyte accumulation was observed in MVivo BIS-infused ones (Fig. 6A). Contrast agents had no or minimal interference with ablative effects of 70% EtOH and wound healing response. A similar amount of tissue damage was observed in all tested contrast agent conditions in 70% EtOH (Fig. 6A, C). Interestingly, pockets of intact epithelial cells were observed in Omnipaque- and Fenestra VC-infused ductal tree, suggesting an incomplete epithelia ablation perhaps due to uneven and heterogenous distribution throughout the lumen of all branches (Fig. 6A). Accumulation of nanoparticle aggregates was only visible in MVivo Au-infused ductal trees (Fig. 6A, D); these aggregates were also observed in distant organs, especially in the spleen and liver (Fig. 6B, D). However, no overt toxicity was observed in major organs whether there were visible nanoparticle aggregates (MVivo Au) or not; there were no atypical tissue presentations in the form of dysplasia, infarction, hemorrhage, fibrotic or immune reaction (Fig. 6B).
Compatibility with ethyl cellulose and scalability of TaOx-based ductal tree visualization in rats
Together, the above results support the superiority of TaOx as contrast agent for this ablative procedure. TaOx was retained in the ductal tree and did not cause toxic effects locally or systemically. TaOx did not interfere with EtOH ablative effect nor were TaOx imaging properties impacted by EtOH. Therefore, our expansion studies exclusively focused on the ability of TaOx to be formulated in solution with ethyl cellulose (EC) as gelling agent and the ability of this refined solution and ablative procedure to be scaled up to a rat model. EC is used clinically in 95–100% EtOH solution for ablative treatment of tumors and sclerosing treatment of venous malformations28–35. We first assessed the ability of EC to slow down EtOH diffusion using tissue phantoms. EC at 5% w/v concentration is not soluble in less than 70% EtOH because of the increased water content (Fig. 7A). Compared to other tested solutions, 70% EtOH with 5% EC had the lowest rate of diffusion (Fig. 7A). To determine the ability of EC to limit EtOH diffusion throughout the mammary gland in vivo, the ductal trees of both mice and rats were infused with a 70% EtOH solution containing TaOx (18 mg Ta/ml) and/or EC (1% w/v). ID injections were successfully translated into the rat model and X-ray imaging capabilities of TaOx were maintained for visualization of infused rat ductal trees (Fig. 7B, C). Macroscopically, EC-containing solutions provide same infusion properties and ductal tree visualization as undoped solutions (Fig. 7C). Microscopically, EC-containing solutions provide same or higher epithelial cell ablation rate and significantly lower collateral tissue damage both in mouse and rat mammary gland tissues examined 3 days after ID injections (Fig. 7D, E). Together, these results indicate that introducing 1% EC to ablative and imaging solution of 70% EtOH and TaOx (18 mg Ta/ml) further improves local targeting epithelial cells with less collateral tissue damage.
DISCUSSION
We evaluated the short-term and long-term performance of contrast agents in visualizing the infused ductal trees in rodent models and any impact on ablation rate, breast physiology, and scalability to larger animal models and eventually humans. From a clinical standpoint, fluoroscopy or similar real-time imaging modality will be needed to guide the ductal tree infusion in future first-in-human clinical trials to evaluate this ablative procedure. Given the desired properties of an ideal contrast agent (visualization of fully filled ductal tree, high local clearance, low toxicity, and compatibility with 70% EtOH) for this therapeutic purpose, we identified TaOx as the most suitable contrast agent. Rapid outward diffusion, especially in 70% EtOH, of FDA-approved Omnipaque (Figs. 1–4 and S1, S2) and gold nanoparticle-containing MVivo Au (Figs. 2–4 and S2) renders them unsuitable for the intended image guidance application of assessing fully filled ductal tree(s). Omnipaque presumably escapes the ductal tree system after extensive epithelial cell ablation and loss of architectural integrity with hyperintensity in the bladder from 0.5 to 2 h indicating rapid systemic clearance (Fig. S1), but additional experiments are needed to test this directly. An unexpected concern of MVivo Au was the discoloration of mice. Immediately after injections, all mice turned a gray color which did not resolve throughout the study. Although there was no observed discomfort or overt toxicity, the systemic spread to internal organs (Fig. 6) and subcutaneous accumulation (Fig. S2) is a cause for concern for continued use. Other contrast agents (Fenestra VC and MVivo BIS) and TaOx exhibited a much higher local retention (Fig. 5B) and enabled initial visualization of infused ductal trees (Figs. 2–4 and S2). However, MVivo BIS produced imaging artifacts that compromised unequivocal and nitid visualization of the true ductal tree architecture (Figs. 2–4 and S2). Fenestra VC enabled similar short-term visualization of the ductal tree as TaOx, with some imaging artifacts due to heterogenous dispersion and diffusion through the lumen and leakage outside the ductal tree (Figs. 2–4 and S2). Higher local retention and limited clearance of Fenestra VC, especially in 70% EtOH, is a problematic feature of this contrast agent (Figs. 4 and S2). In exploratory experiments, animals infused with Fenestra VC or MVivo BIS in more than two mammary glands died shortly after injections. The total amount of contrast injected was above vendor’s recommended bolus dose for intravenous administration. This suggests that the maximal tolerated dose of these contrast agents as formulated would be a limiting factor for intended application in ID imaging procedures in women. In contrast, animals infused with TaOx in six or more mammary glands tolerated this procedure well10,11.
A main goal of this study was the serial imaging of different contrast agents. This required several sessions with X-ray radiation. While the cumulative X-ray dose delivered was less than 500 mGy36, radiation may have contributed to foreign object recognition and clearance by the host immune system and overall wound healing process. Short-term effects of radiation (<7 days after injections) did not appear to interfere with EtOH-induced epithelial ablation with different contrast agents compared to EtOH treatment alone in our previous study8. Long-term effects of radiation and/or contrast agent additions appeared to delay wound healing process compared to EtOH treatment alone8. We used commercially available contrast agents at stock concentrations recommended by the vendor for intravenous injections. We acknowledge that refinement of the concentration or formulation of these nanoparticle-based contrast agents may make them more suitable for the intended intraductal applications, especially since many of these agents are for preclinical research purposes only. However, under same conditions, off-the-shelf TaOx nanoparticles outperformed all these contrast agents. This highlights the versatility of our in-housed synthesized TaOx construct that can be reconstituted at a wide range of concentrations in hydrophilic, polar, and hydrophobic solutions (Fig. S2, ref. 9).
We also broadened the versatility of TaOx as imaging agent by scaling up ID procedure and in vivo X-ray visualization of the infused ductal tree in rat models (Fig. 7B, C). We introduced ethyl cellulose (EC) as gelling agent to limit collateral tissue damage caused by diffusion of EtOH. EC is safe for human consumption and is clinically used with EtOH for treatment of tumors and venous malformation28–35. The addition of 1% EC had no impact on ablative rate and aided in reducing EtOH dispersion outside of the ductal tree (Fig. 7D, E). However, some animals experienced limb stiffness with the addition of EC. Tissue analyses show wound healing process resolves about 1 month after ablative procedure (Fig. 7A). However, further investigation will be needed to determine the specific immunological and fibroblastic responses to tissue damage that may be caused and compounded by the combination of 70% EtOH, TaOx and/or EC, and if higher % of EC may be beneficial to faster resolution of wound healing. Current protocols for BC diagnosis utilize X-ray or MR imaging for confirmation of masses within the breast and lack of clearance of a contrast agent might interfere or create imaging artifacts. While TaOx signal is less than 36% of maximal signal 3 days after injection, there is still about 10% of maximal signal detected after 60 days (Fig. 5B). Therefore, it will be important to refine TaOx formulation to maximize clearance after 3 days and/or determine what amount of residual contrast agent may have a potential impact on follow-up imaging session for anatomical assessment and/or tumor surveillance. While these rodent models are well-established for assessing therapeutic efficacy (tumor latency, tumor incidence, and overall survival), both mice and rats have a single-ductal tree per mammary gland with a relatively simple and linear structure37,38. Rabbits are a larger animal model closer to humans evolutionarily, physiologically, and anatomically with multiple ducts per mammary gland39–46. Therefore, utilizing rabbit models and fluoroscopy to guide infusion of cannulated nipples in future studies should improve the success rate of the procedure, address challenges of simultaneous infusion of multi-ductal tree system and impact on cosmesis and collateral tissue damage, and further assess the scalability toward application in humans. In conclusion, this study sets the stage for clinically enabling toxicity and efficacy studies in a large animal model such as rabbit and ultimately first-in-human evaluation of this image-guided ablative procedure for BC risk reduction.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank members of the Sempere and Shapiro Laboratories for critical reading and suggestions. We would like to thank MSU Institute for Quantitative (IQ) Health Science and Engineering Advanced Molecular Imaging Core Facility (IQAMIF) and MSU Precision Health Program (PHP) Tissue Analysis Core for technical assistance. This work was supported, in part, by National Institute of Health R21 CA226579 and R01 CA258314 grants to L.F.S., R03 EB028349 and R21 AI159928 to P.W., and R01EB029418 to E.M.S., by Doctoral Program in Environmental and Integrative Toxicological Sciences of the Institute for Integrative Toxicology 2021, 2022, 2023 Summer Research Stipend to E.K.Z., and by American Society for Investigative Pathology 2020 Summer Research Opportunity Program in Pathology to K.P.
Footnotes
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44303-024-00007-5.
CODE AVAILABILITY
The underlying code for this study and training/validation datasets is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.
REFERENCES
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS & Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin 73, 17–48 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Britt KL, Cuzick J & Phillips KA Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 417–436 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Padamsee TJ, Wills CE, Yee LD & Paskett ED Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk. Breast Cancer Res. 19, 34 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Slawson SH & Johnson BA Ductography: how to and what if? Radiographics 21, 133–150 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sheiman LS & Levesque PH The in’s and out’s of ductography: a comprehensive review. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol 45, 61–70 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sapienza Passos J, Dartora V, Cassone Salata G, Draszesski Malago I & Lopes LB Contributions of nanotechnology to the intraductal drug delivery for local treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Int. J. Pharm 635, 122681 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zaluzec EK & Sempere LF Systemic and local strategies for primary prevention of breast cancer. Cancers 16, 248 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kenyon E. et al. Ductal tree ablation by local delivery of ethanol prevents tumor formation in an aggressive mouse model of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 21, 129 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chakravarty S. et al. Tantalum oxide nanoparticles as versatile contrast agents for X-ray computed tomography. Nanoscale 12, 7720–7734 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kenyon E. et al. X-Ray visualization of intraductal ethanol-based ablative treatment for prevention of breast cancer in rat models. J. Vis. Exp 190, e64042 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kenyon E. et al. Intraductal delivery and X-ray visualization of ethanol-based ablative solution for prevention and local treatment of breast cancer in mouse models. J. Vis. Exp 182, e63457 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robertson N. et al. Omniparticle contrast agent for multimodal imaging: synthesis and characterization in an animal model. Mol. Imaging Biol 25, 401–412 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang G. et al. Intraductal fulvestrant for therapy of ERalpha-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast-a preclinical study. Carcinogenesis 40, 903–913 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brock A. et al. Silencing HoxA1 by intraductal injection of siRNA lipidoid nanoparticles prevents mammary tumor progression in mice. Sci. Transl. Med 6, 217ra212 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chun YS et al. Intraductally administered pegylated liposomal doxorubicin reduces mammary stem cell function in the mammary gland but in the long term, induces malignant tumors. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 135, 201–208 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chun YS et al. Intraductal administration of a polymeric nanoparticle formulation of curcumin (NanoCurc) significantly attenuates incidence of mammary tumors in a rodent chemical carcinogenesis model: implications for breast cancer chemoprevention in at-risk populations. Carcinogenesis 33, 2242–2249 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Murata S. et al. Ductal access for prevention and therapy of mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 66, 638–645 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Okugawa H. et al. Effect of perductal paclitaxel exposure on the development of MNU-induced mammary carcinoma in female S-D rats. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 91, 29–34 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sivaraman L. et al. Effect of selective ablation of proliferating mammary epithelial cells on MNU induced rat mammary tumorigenesis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 73, 75–83 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stearns V. et al. Preclinical and clinical evaluation of intraductally administered agents in early breast cancer. Sci. Transl. Med 3, 106ra108 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yoshida T. et al. Effective treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with a HER-2-targeted alpha-particle emitting radionuclide in a preclinical model of human breast cancer. Oncotarget 7, 33306–33315 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Groot JS et al. Intraductal cisplatin treatment in a BRCA-associated breast cancer mouse model attenuates tumor development but leads to systemic tumors in aged female mice. Oncotarget 8, 60750–60763 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim BY, Rutka JT & Chan WC Nanomedicine. N. Engl. J. Med 363, 2434–2443 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.DiCorpo D. et al. The role of Micro-CT in imaging breast cancer specimens. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 180, 343–357 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsu JC et al. Nanoparticle contrast agents for X-ray imaging applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol 12, e1642 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhao H. et al. Molecular imaging and deep learning analysis of uMUC1 expression in response to chemotherapy in an orthotopic model of ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep 10, 14942 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sempere LF, Zaluzec E, Kenyon E, Kiupel M & Moore A Automated five-color multiplex co-detection of MicroRNA and protein expression in fixed tissue specimens. Methods Mol. Biol 2148, 257–276 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lai YE, Morhard R, Ramanujam N & Nolan MW Minimally invasive ethyl cellulose ethanol ablation in domesticated cats with naturally occurring head and neck cancers: six cats. Vet. Comp. Oncol 19, 492–500 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mueller JL et al. Optimizing ethyl cellulose-ethanol delivery towards enabling ablation of cervical dysplasia. Sci. Rep 11, 16869 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nief C. et al. Polymer-assisted intratumoral delivery of ethanol: preclinical investigation of safety and efficacy in a murine breast cancer model. PLoS ONE 16, e0234535 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chelales E. et al. Radiologic-pathologic analysis of increased ethanol localization and ablative extent achieved by ethyl cellulose. Sci. Rep 11, 20700 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morhard R. et al. Understanding factors governing distribution volume of ethyl cellulose-ethanol to optimize ablative therapy in the liver. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 67, 2337–2348 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Morhard R. et al. Development of enhanced ethanol ablation as an alternative to surgery in treatment of superficial solid tumors. Sci. Rep 7, 8750 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sannier K. et al. A new sclerosing agent in the treatment of venous malformations. Study on 23 cases. Interv. Neuroradiol 10, 113–127 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dompmartin A. et al. Radio-opaque ethylcellulose-ethanol is a safe and efficient sclerosing agent for venous malformations. Eur. Radiol 21, 2647–2656 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fujimichi Y, Sasaki M, Yoshida K & Iwasaki T Effects of irradiation on cumulative mortality in mice: shifting toward a younger age of death. J. Radiat. Res 64, 412–419 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Russo IH & Russo J Developmental stage of the rat mammary gland as determinant of its susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene. J. Natl Cancer Inst 61, 1439–1449 (1978). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paine IS & Lewis MT The terminal end bud: the little engine that could. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 22, 93–108 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hughes K. Comparative mammary gland postnatal development and tumourigenesis in the sheep, cow, cat and rabbit: exploring the menagerie. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 114, 186–195 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schöniger S, Degner S, Jasani B & Schoon H-A A review on mammary tumors in rabbits: translation of pathology into medical care. Animals 9, 762 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Falconer IR The distribution of 131 I- or 125 I-labelled prolactin in rabbit mammary tissue after intravenous or intraductal injection. J. Endocrinol 53, 58–59 (1972). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fiddler TJ, Birkinshaw M & Falconer IR Effects of intraductal prolactin on some aspects of the ultrastructure and biochemistry of mammary tissue in the pseudopregnant rabbit. J. Endocrinol 49, 459–469 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fiddler TJ & Falconer IR The effect of intraductal prolactin on protein and nucleic acid biosynthesis in the rabbit mammary gland. Biochem. J 115, 58P–59P (1969). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bourne RA, Bryant JA & Falconer IR Stimulation of DNA synthesis by prolactin in rabbit mammary tissue. J. Cell Sci 14, 105–111 (1974). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chadwick A. Detection and assay of prolactin by the local lactogenic response in the rabbit. J. Endocrinol 27, 253–263 (1963). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Clark A, Bird NK & Brock A Intraductal delivery to the rabbit mammary gland. J. Vis. Exp 121, e55209 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.