Table 1. Results of methodological quality of the included studies.
| Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute studies | |||||||||||
| Atalağ et al. (2020) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Carbone et al. (2020) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Dello Iacono, Martone & Padulo (2016) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Fernández-Galván et al. (2022) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Short-term studies | |||||||||||
| Abade et al. (2021) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Asencio et al. (2022) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Aztarain-Cardiel et al. (2023) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Barbalho et al. (2020) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Contreras et al. (2017) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Dello Iacono et al. (2017) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Gonzalo-Skok et al. (2019) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Hammond et al. (2019) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Keller et al. (2020) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Kurt et al. (2023) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Los Arcos et al. (2014) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Loturco et al. (2015) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Manouras et al. (2016) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Nobari et al. (2023) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Ramírez-Campillo et al. (2015) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Talukdar et al. (2022) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Tibor, Judit & Zoltán (1990) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Wilson et al. (2022) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Average score = 8.59, Median score = 8 | |||||||||||
Note:
Item: 1. the objectives of the study were clearly reported, 2. the main outcomes to be assessed were clearly reported, 3. the characteristics of the participants were clearly reported, 4. the main ûndings were clearly reported, 5. the estimates of the random variability in the data for the main outcomes were clearly reported, 6. the actual probability values were clearly reported, 7. can the participants represent the entire population, 8. if any of the results of the study were based on ‘data dredging’ was this made clear?, 9. were the statistical tests appropriate, 10. were the main outcome measure accurate. 1 the item was clearly reported, 0 the item was not clearly reported, ? unknown.