Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bioresources and Bioprocessing logoLink to Bioresources and Bioprocessing
. 2024 Sep 19;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40643-024-00803-2

Enhancement of lactate fraction in poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) biosynthesized by metabolically engineered E. coli

Binghao Zhang 1,#, Pengye Guo 1,#, Xinye Sun 1, Yanzhe Shang 2, Yuanchan Luo 1, Hui Wu 1,2,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC11413402  PMID: 39297980

Abstract

Poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) [P(LA-co-3HB)] is a high-molecular-weight biomaterial with excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. In this study, the properties of P(LA-co-3HB) were examined and found to be affected by its lactate fraction. The efficiency of lactyl-CoA biosynthesis from intracellular lactate significantly affected the microbial synthesis of P(LA-co-3HB). Two CoA transferases from Anaerotignum lactatifermentans and Bacillota bacterium were selected for use in copolymer biosynthesis from 11 candidates. We found that cotAl enhanced the lactate fraction by 31.56% compared to that of the frequently used modified form of propionyl-CoA transferase from Anaerotignum propionicum. In addition, utilizing xylose as a favorable carbon source and blocking the lactate degradation pathway further enhanced the lactate fraction to 30.42 mol% and 52.84 mol%, respectively. Furthermore, when a 5 L bioreactor was used for fermentation utilizing xylose as a carbon source, the engineered strain produced 60.60 wt% P(46.40 mol% LA-co-3HB), which was similar to the results of our flask experiments. Our results indicate that the application of new CoA transferases has great potential for the biosynthesis of other lactate-based copolymers.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name 40643_2024_803_Figa_HTML.jpg

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40643-024-00803-2.

Keywords: Poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate), Lactyl-CoA, CoA transferases, Lactate-based copolymers

Introduction

Bioplastics, which are biodegradable and biocompatible, offer a promising solution to mitigate increasingly severe resource and environmental challenges posed by fossil-fuel derived plastics (Ali et al. 2024; Choi et al. 2020; Guo et al. 2021; Liao et al. 2024; Lv et al. 2022; Zhong et al. 2023). Among bioplastics, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are at the forefront of bioplastics research and development efforts (Ganesh Saratale et al. 2021; Park et al. 2024; Yukesh Kannah et al. 2022). PHAs can be synthesized by microorganisms to achieve extremely high molecular weights at a low cost (Medeiros Garcia Alcântara et al. 2020).

Among the PHA biosynthetic pathways, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) is the most extensively studied (Choi et al. 2020; Ganesh Saratale et al. 2021; Yukesh Kannah et al. 2022). Introducing a lactate monomer into the PHB chain enables the formation of poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) [P(LA-co-3HB)] and effectively enhances the properties of the polymer. These enhanced properties are dependent on the lactate fraction (Yamada et al. 2011). Microbial synthesis of lactate-based PHAs involves two key processes: the efficient conversion of lactate into lactyl-CoA, and the selection of a PHA synthase that can accept lactyl-CoA as the substrate (Dundas and Dinneny 2022; Taguchi et al. 2008). Significant efforts have been made to achieve the first goal.

P(LA-co-3HB) was biosynthesized for the first time using propionyl-CoA transferase (Pct) from Megasphaera elsdenii (Taguchi et al. 2008). Subsequently, Pct from Anaerotignum propionicum, due to its toxicity and inefficient conversion of lactate into lactyl-CoA, was modified to generate Pct532Ap and Pct540Ap (Yang et al. 2010). PctMe and Pct540Ap have been widely used to produce various lactate-based copolymers (Choi et al. 2016; Li et al. 2016, 2017). Pcts from Clostridium perfringens (Jin et al. 2016) and several butyryl-CoA transferases (Bcts) (David et al. 2017) have also been used. The production of other products derived from the conversion of lactate into lactyl-CoA, including propionate (Balasubramanian et al. 2020; Baur et al. 2022; Kandasamy et al. 2013), 1,2-propanediol (Niu and Guo 2015; Niu et al. 2019), lactate esters (Lee and Trinh 2019; Ren et al. 2020), and polylactate (PLA) (Lajus et al. 2020; Shi et al. 2022; Tan et al. 2022; Ylinen et al. 2021), uses Pcts from A. neopropionicum (Baur et al. 2022), Cupriavidus necator (Lajus et al. 2020; Ren et al. 2020), and Moorella thermoacetica (Ren et al. 2020). In addition, acyl-CoA: acetate/3-ketoacid CoA transferase from Megasphaera sp. DISK 18 (Zhang et al. 2019), 3-ketoacid CoA transferase from A. lactatifermentans (Zhang et al. 2019), and acetate CoA transferase from Bacillota bacterium (Zhang et al. 2019) and Escherichia coli (ydiF) (Dong et al. 2022) have the ability to convert CoA to lactate.

The composition of P(LA-co-3HB) can be affected by the intracellular lactyl-CoA concentration, as it influences the mobility of the polymerized product (Matsumoto et al. 2018). The enzyme activity of the converting lactate into lactyl-CoA affects the composition of the copolymer. Therefore, we tested various CoA transferases in the copolymer biosynthesis system in order to select enzymes that are more conducive to the copolymerization of the high-lactate fraction. In addition, multiple strategies were used to further amplify the advantages of the selected enzymes. Finally, in addition to CoA transferases, several CoA synthetases were tested to determine whether CoA can be directly linked to lactate.

Methods

Strains and plasmids

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S1. Strain WXJ01 and plasmids pTrc99aABC and pBad33-Ptrc-pct540Ap were obtained from previous studies (Lu et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2010). CoA transferases and synthetases from different sources were codon optimized, synthesized, and inserted into pBad33-Ptrc using gene synthesis and plasmid DNA preparation services (GenScript, Nanjing, China). The original promoter of pBad33 was replaced with the IPTG-induced trc promoter (pTrc99a source) to form pBad33-Ptrc. The plasmids were transformed into strains by electroporation.

Medium and culture conditions

Luria-Bertani medium with 10 g NaCl, 10 g tryptone, and 5 g yeast extract per liter was used for the seed culture. Fermentation medium with 15.12 g Na2HPO4·12H2O, 3 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g NaCl, 1 g NH4Cl, 0.493 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.0111 g CaCl2, and 0.002 g vitamin B1 per liter was used for the shake flask culture. Ampicillin (100 mg/L) and chloramphenicol (34 mg/L) were added to ensure plasmid stability, and the seed was cultured at 37℃ and 220 rpm. A 2% (v/v) seed was added to shaker flask and cultured overnight. The shake flask was cultured at 30℃ and 220 rpm and allowed to ferment for 60 h. For the substrate, 10 g/L glucose or xylose was added. IPTG (0.1 mM) was added at the beginning of the fermentation process to induce enzyme expression. All shake flask experiments were performed in triplicates.

Fed-batch fermentation

The 5 L bioreactor experiment was performed according to previously described instrumentation and inoculation methods (Wu et al. 2023). The bioreactor medium contained 50 g/L xylose and 5 g/L yeast extract. The culture temperature was maintained at 30 °C and the pH was maintained at 7.0 by using NH4OH (25%, v/v). Feeding was set at 36 h, and the xylose concentration was maintained at 50 g/L.

Analytical methods

Optical density was measured at 600 nm. The concentrations of glucose, xylose, and lactate were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (LC-20 A, Shimadzu, Japan) with a refractive index detector (RID-20 A, Shimadzu, Japan) and cation exchange column (HPX-87 H, Bio-Rad, United States). The detector temperature was 45℃ and the column temperature was 65℃. For the mobile phase, 5 mM H2SO4 was used at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The intracellular polymer content and fraction of lactate in the copolymer after 60 h were determined using a previously described method (Wu et al. 2021, 2023).

Results and discussion

Selecting and applying CoA transferases and synthetases for P(LA-co-3HB) production

The Pct from C. necator was not considered a good choice because of its poor specificity (Lindenkamp et al. 2013; Volodina et al. 2014). The catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of the CoA transferase from Megasphaera sp. DISK 18 was lower than that of cotAl and cotBb (Zhang et al. 2019). Thus, cotAl, cotBb, and ydiF were selected, which are all members of the OXCT1 family (Hackmann 2022) of CoA transferases. We also selected other enzymes, including cotDm, cotSe, and cotSc. With the exception of cotSc, which has DXGXXG and GXGG(A/F) motifs, all of the other selected enzymes contain the highly conserved EXGXXG and GXGG(A/F) sequence motifs (Fig. S1) (Rangarajan et al. 2005). The identical sequence motifs show that these six enzymes belong to the same enzyme family, indicating the possibility of the latter three (cotDm, cotSe, and cotSc) catalyzing lactate.

In addition, several CoA synthetases were selected based on their ability to catalyze the production of short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) (Yoshimura et al. 2017). It has been speculated that the active pocket of these enzymes accepts lactate (2-hydroxypropionate) to generate lactyl-CoA. Compared to acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain (ACSS) family members ACSS1 and ACSS2, the preferred substrate of ACSS3 is propionate (Yoshimura et al. 2017). Thus, ACSS3Mm (Wang et al. 2024) and ACSS3Hs, which is 89.50% identical to ACSS3Mm (Fig. S2), were selected. Acetoacetate is the simplest 3-ketoacid, and cosPa, which uses acetoacetate as a substrate, may catalyze lactate. Therefore, the effect of cosPa was also tested. Previous studies have shown that propionyl-CoA synthetase (prpE) from E. coli cannot catalyze the conversion of lactate to lactyl-CoA (data not shown). However, the effect of medium-chain fatty acid CoA synthetase (fadK) from E. coli, which prefers C6-C8 chain fatty acid substrates (Morgan-Kiss and Cronan 2004), was tested as well as cosSf, which is 97.35% identical to fadK (Fig. S3).

The pre-constructed plasmids (Fig. 1A) were transformed into E. coli and pct540Ap was used as a control to verify the effect of the selected 11 enzymes. Results of MG1655-01–12 using glucose are shown in Fig. 1B and C. Only cotAl and cotBb added the lactate fraction to the polymer, which produced 69.00 wt% P(13.88 mol% LA-co-3HB) and 69.35 wt% P(8.12 mol% LA-co-3HB) respectively. Of these, only the effect of cotAl was better than that of pct540Ap [69.65 wt% P(10.55 mol% LA-co-3HB)].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis of MG1655 using CoA transferases and synthetases from different sources with 10 g/L glucose. A, the schematic diagrams of 3-hydroxybutyrate-CoA and copolymer synthesis module and lactyl-CoA synthesis module [the red-labeled enzymes in pBad33-Ptrc can efficiently provide lactyl-CoA required for P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis]; B, the optical density at 60 h; C, the P(LA-co-3HB) content and the lactate fraction; D, the glucose consumption; E, the lactate production

Although cotAl and cotBb had better kcat/Km values than that of pct540Ap (Zhang et al. 2019), cotBb did not demonstrate an advantage in the copolymer biosynthesis system. These results may be due to the differences in the in vitro and in vivo activities of these enzymes. The application of cotAl increased the lactate concentration (Fig. 1E), indicating that the large flux of cotAl drives the carbon flow toward lactate, thereby producing a copolymer containing a higher lactate fraction. The glucose consumption rate of MG1655-02 increased slightly (Fig. 1D), possibly because the increased lactate overflow enahnced carbon source utilization (Wei et al. 2021). The protein structures of pct540Ap and cotAl are highly similar (Fig. S4), confirming the ability of cotAl to catalyze the conversion of lactate into lactyl-CoA. Therefore, a copolymer biosynthesis system containing cotAl was the starting point for subsequent research.

Xylose enhances the lactate fraction in the P(LA-co-3HB) copolymer

Compared to glucose, xylose utilization enhanced the lactate fraction in the copolymer (Nduko et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2023). When xylose was used, MG1655-02 produced 76.03 wt% P(30.42 mol% LA-co-3HB) with a significantly higher lactate fraction compared to that of glucose (Fig. 2A and E).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis of MG1655-02 with 10 g/L glucose or xylose. A, the metabolic pathway of P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis from glucose or xylose (solid lines represent reactions, blank circles represent compounds, and dotted lines connect same compounds at both ends); B, the optical density; C, the substrate consumption; D, the lactate production; E, the P(LA-co-3HB) content and the lactate fraction

The final optical density of MG1655-02 using xylose was lower than that of MG1655-02 using glucose (Fig. 2B), which is consistent with the slower substrate consumption rate of xylose (Fig. 2C). This phenomenon has been observed in a previous study (Wu et al. 2023) and may be caused by lower energy production and higher CO2 release from xylose metabolism (Gonzalez et al. 2017). Although the total production of NADH and NADPH was similar for both sugars, the xylose utilization pathway via the pentose phosphate pathway and the greater tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle flux of xylose caused xylose to produce NADH and NADPH at a different production source ratio than glucose (Gonzalez et al. 2017), which may explain why the copolymer produced from xylose contained a higher lactate fraction.

Blocking the D-lactate degradation pathway improves the lactate fraction in the P(LA-co-3HB) copolymer

In E. coli, quinone-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase (dld) converts D-lactate into pyruvate (Fig. 3A) (Dym et al. 2000). It is believed that knocking out dld causes the accumulation of lactate and the formation of more lactyl-CoA, thereby enhancing the lactate fraction in the copolymer (Choi et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2019; Nduko et al. 2014; Wei et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2021). WXJ01-02 produced 64.38 wt% P(32.08 mol% LA-co-3HB) from glucose and 59.93 wt% P(52.84 mol% LA-co-3HB) from xylose (Fig. 3E).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis of WXJ01-02 with 10 g/L glucose or xylose. A, the schematic diagram of the intracellular conversion of D-lactate and pyruvate; B, the optical density; C, the substrate consumption; D, the lactate production; E, the P(LA-co-3HB) content and the lactate fraction

Xylose was found to be better than glucose as carbon sources for P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis. The final optical density of glucose was still higher than that of xylose (Fig. 3B), which is similar to the results in the previous section (Fig. 2B). Both sugars were utilized at slightly faster rates (Figs. 2C and 3C). The increase in carbon source utilization may be due to the fact that lactate cannot enter the TCA cycle via pyruvate after lactate reflux is blocked (Wei et al. 2021). The lactate concentration peaked at 24 h (Fig. 3D) and was significantly higher compared to that without dld deletion (Fig. 2D), which explains why the lactate fraction in the copolymer was significantly enhanced with dld deletion.

We explored the effects of dld deletion on cell metabolism and physiology without introducing the copolymer synthesis module. The dld deletion only significantly increased lactate production without affecting cell growth, substrate consumption, and acetate production (Fig. S5A-H). This further demonstrates that dld deletion is an effective strategy to increase the lactate fraction in the copolymer. Environmental acidification caused by a high acetate concentration and the toxicity of acetate (Chun et al. 2014) inhibited cell metabolism (Fig. S5B and D). The introduction of the copolymer synthesis module can significantly pull the carbon flow toward lactate (Fig. 3D and Fig. S5C and G).

P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis using the bioreactor

The effects of MG1655-02 and WXJ01-02 were scaled up in a 5 L bioreactor. The two strains eventually produced 74.14 wt% P(33.73 mol% LA-co-3HB) and 60.60 wt% P(46.40 mol% LA-co-3HB) respectively, and their polymer contents reached a stable level at 36 h (Fig. 4B and D), which indicates that xylose did not flow into the copolymer after feeding.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

P(LA-co-3HB) biosynthesis of MG1655-02 and WXJ01-02 with 10 g/L xylose in a 5 L bioreactor. A, the xylose consumption and the lactate and the acetate production of MG1655-02; B, the optical density, the P(LA-co-3HB) content, and the lactate fraction of MG1655-02; C, the xylose consumption and the lactate and the acetate production of WXJ01-02; D, the optical density, the P(LA-co-3HB) content, and the lactate fraction of WXJ01-02

MG1655-02 consumed all xylose at 72 h, whereas WXJ01-02 had 28.15 g/L of xylose remaining (Fig. 4A and C). However, the optical densities ​​of both strains were similar (Fig. 4B and D), indicating that xylose did not flow into the biomass after feeding. No obvious byproducts except lactate and acetate were detected using HPLC. However, MG1655-02 produced more bubbles than WXJ01-02 after feeding during fermentation, indicating that MG1655-02 converted xylose into gas (possibly CO2 or H2). WXJ01-02 converted xylose into lactate and acetate (Fig. 4C). In contrast to the results obtained in the shake flask (Figs. 2C and 3C), the xylose consumption rate of WXJ01-02 was much lower than that of MG1655-02 (Fig. 4A and C). This may be because a high lactate concentration is toxic to cells (Chun et al. 2014), thus affecting the metabolism of WXJ01-02. At 48 h, MG1655-02 showed obvious consumption of lactate (no flow into the copolymer) and acetate, and this process began with the massive consumption of xylose (Fig. 4A), indicating the existence of a non-strict hierarchical carbon utilization (Okano et al. 2021). The polymer content of MG1655-02 was higher than that of WXJ01-02, whereas the lactate fraction of MG1655-02 was lower than that of WXJ01-02 (Fig. 4B and D). The incorporation of lactyl-CoA in the polymer chain leads to premature termination of the polymer chain (Matsumoto et al. 2018); thus, the higher the lactate fraction, the lower the polymer content. The lactate fraction of WXJ01-02 increased over time. However, the polymer content did not change significantly (Fig. 4D), indicating that the produced polymer was not uniform. When the lactate concentration was low, a polymer with a low lactate fraction was produced. When the lactate concentration was high, a polymer with a high lactate fraction was produced. Without affecting the polymer content, the bioreactor increased the lactate fraction of MG1655-02 but decreased the lactate fraction of WXJ01-02. The decreased lactate fraction may be due to the toxicity of lactate and influenced by the lactyl-CoA concentration. Therefore, the lactate concentration in the bioreactor should be strictly controlled.

Conclusions

Among the selected 11 enzymes, cotAl and cotBb supported P(LA-co-3HB) production. Compared with pct540Ap, cotAl performed better in the copolymer biosynthesis system. Xylose was a more favorable carbon source than glucose. Knockout of dld further enhanced the lactate fraction. Ultimately, 59.93 wt% P(52.84 mol% LA-co-3HB) was produced in a shake flask. Furthermore, when a 5 L bioreactor was used for fermentation utilizing xylose as a carbon source, the engineered strain produced 60.60 wt% P(46.40 mol% LA-co-3HB). The results indicate that the application of new CoA transferases has great potential for the biosynthesis of other lactate-based copolymers.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (1.2MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Abbreviations

PHA

Polyhydroxyalkanoate

PHB

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)

P(LA-co-3HB)

Poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate)

Pct

Propionyl-CoA transferase

Bct

Butyryl-CoA transferase

PLA

Polylactate

ydiF

Acetate CoA transferase from E. coli

HPLC

High performance liquid chromatography

kcat/Km

The catalytic efficiency

cotAl

CoA transferase from A. lactatifermentans

cotBb

CoA transferase from B. bacterium

cotDm

CoA transferase from D. melanogaster

cotSe

CoA transferase from Sa. enterica

cotSc

CoA transferase from St. carnosus

ACSS

Acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain

ACSS3Mm

CoA synthetase from M. musculus

ACSS3Hs

CoA synthetase from H. sapiens

cosPa

CoA synthetase from P. aeruginosa

prpE

Propionyl-CoA synthetase from E. coli

fadK

Medium-chain fatty acid CoA synthetase from E. coli

cosSf

CoA synthetase from Sh. flexneri

TCA

Tricarboxylic acid

dld

Quinone-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase from E. coli

AmpR

Ampicillin resistance

ChlR

Chloramphenicol resistance

phaA

Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase from C. necator

phaB1

Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase from C. necator

phaC

Class II poly(R)-hydroxyalkanoic acid synthase from P. fluorescens

ldhA

D-lactate dehydrogenase from E. coli

Author contributions

BZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. PG, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. XS, YS and YL, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. HW, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22278137), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2103500). Partially supported by Open Funding Project of the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study did not involve either human participants, human data and human tissue or animals. As such additional consent for publication beyond that of each author is not required.

Consent for publication

Each author has consented to the publication of this study, incl. main manuscript and supporting information.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Binghao Zhang and Pengye Guo contributed equally to this work.

Change history

10/12/2024

The original online version of this article has been revised: the table 1 has been removed.

Change history

10/12/2024

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1186/s40643-024-00810-3

References

  1. Ali S, Lodhi FS, Ahmad MU, Khan QF, Asad ur R, Ahmed A, Liaqat I, Aftab MN, Shah TA, Salamatullah AM, Wondmie GF, Bourhia M (2024) Kinetics and synthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by a putative-mutant of Bacillus licheniformis. Bioresources Bioprocess 11(1):41. 10.1186/s40643-024-00750-y [Google Scholar]
  2. Balasubramanian S, Chandrasekran P, Yesudhas AJR, Ganapathyraman P, Eiteman MA, Subramanian R (2020) In vivo interpretation of model predicted inhibition in acrylate pathway engineered Lactococcus lactis. Biotechnol Bioeng 117(12):3785–3798. 10.1002/bit.27517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baur T, Wentzel A, Dürre P (2022) Production of propionate using metabolically engineered strains of Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106(22):7547–7562. 10.1007/s00253-022-12210-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi SY, Park SJ, Kim WJ, Yang JE, Lee H, Shin J, Lee SY (2016) One-step fermentative production of poly(lactate-co-glycolate) from carbohydrates in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 34(4):435–440. 10.1038/nbt.3485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi SY, Rhie MN, Kim HT, Joo JC, Cho IJ, Son J, Jo SY, Sohn YJ, Baritugo K-A, Pyo J, Lee Y, Lee SY, Park SJ (2020) Metabolic engineering for the synthesis of polyesters: a 100-year journey from polyhydroxyalkanoates to non-natural microbial polyesters. Metab Eng 58:47–81. 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chun AY, Yunxiao L, Ashok S, Seol E, Park S (2014) Elucidation of toxicity of organic acids inhibiting growth of Escherichia coli W. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 19(5):858–865. 10.1007/s12257-014-0420-y [Google Scholar]
  7. David Y, Joo JC, Yang JE, Oh YH, Lee SY, Park SJ (2017) Biosynthesis of 2-hydroxyacid-containing polyhydroxyalkanoates by employing butyryl-CoA transferases in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol J 12(11):1700116. 10.1002/biot.201700116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong H, Zhang J, Zhang H, Han Y, Lu C, Chen C, Tan X, Wang S, Bai X, Zhai G, Tian S, Zhang T, Cheng Z, Li E, Xu L, Zhang K (2022) YiaC and CobB regulate lysine lactylation in Escherichia coli. Nat Commun 13(1):6628. 10.1038/s41467-022-34399-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dundas CM, Dinneny JR (2022) Genetic circuit design in Rhizobacteria. BioDesign Res 2022:9858049. 10.34133/2022/9858049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Dym O, Pratt EA, Ho C, Eisenberg D (2000) The crystal structure of d-lactate dehydrogenase, a peripheral membrane respiratory enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(17):9413–9418. 10.1073/pnas.97.17.9413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ganesh Saratale R, Cho S-K, Dattatraya Saratale G, Kadam AA, Ghodake GS, Kumar M, Naresh Bharagava R, Kumar G, Kim S, Mulla D, S. I., Shin S, H (2021) A comprehensive overview and recent advances on polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production using various organic waste streams. Bioresour Technol 325:124685. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gonzalez JE, Long CP, Antoniewicz MR (2017) Comprehensive analysis of glucose and xylose metabolism in Escherichia coli under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by 13C metabolic flux analysis. Metab Eng 39:9–18. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo P, Luo Y, Wu J, Wu H (2021) Recent advances in the microbial synthesis of lactate-based copolymer. Bioresources Bioprocess 8(1):106. 10.1186/s40643-021-00458-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hackmann TJ (2022) Redefining the coenzyme a transferase superfamily with a large set of manually annotated proteins. Protein Sci 31(4):864–881. 10.1002/pro.4277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jin KY, Chae CG, Joo JC, Song B-K, Lee SY (2016) Biosynthesis of lactate-containing polyhydroxyalkanoates in recombinant Escherichia coli by employing new CoA transferases. Korean Soc Biotechnol Bioeng J 31(1):27–32. 10.7841/ksbbj.2016.31.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kandasamy V, Vaidyanathan H, Djurdjevic I, Jayamani E, Ramachandran KB, Buckel W, Jayaraman G, Ramalingam S (2013) Engineering Escherichia coli with acrylate pathway genes for propionic acid synthesis and its impact on mixed-acid fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(3):1191–1200. 10.1007/s00253-012-4274-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lajus S, Dusséaux S, Verbeke J, Rigouin C, Guo Z, Fatarova M, Bellvert F, Borsenberger V, Bressy M, Nicaud J-M, Marty A, Bordes F (2020) Engineering the yeast Yarrowia Lipolytica for production of polylactic acid homopolymer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Lee J-W, Trinh CT (2019) Microbial biosynthesis of lactate esters. Biotechnol Biofuels 12(1):226. 10.1186/s13068-019-1563-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Z-J, Qiao K, Shi W, Pereira B, Zhang H, Olsen BD, Stephanopoulos G (2016) Biosynthesis of poly(glycolate-co-lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) from glucose by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 35:1–8. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Z-J, Qiao K, Che X-M, Stephanopoulos G (2017) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the synthesis of the quadripolymer poly(glycolate-co-lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) from glucose. Metab Eng 44:38–44. 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Liao X-P, Wu Q, Zong M-H, Li N (2024) A straightforward chemobiocatalytic route for one-pot valorization of glucose into 2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan. Bioresources Bioprocess 11(1):38. 10.1186/s40643-024-00758-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lindenkamp N, Schürmann M, Steinbüchel A (2013) A propionate CoA-transferase of Ralstonia eutropha H16 with broad substrate specificity catalyzing the CoA thioester formation of various carboxylic acids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(17):7699–7709. 10.1007/s00253-012-4624-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu J, Li Z, Ye Q, Wu H (2019) Effect of reducing the activity of respiratory chain on biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-lactate) in Escherichia coli. Chin J Biotechnol 35(1):59–69. 10.13345/j.cjb.180107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lv X, Xue H, Qin L, Li C (2022) Transporter Engineering in Microbial Cell Factory boosts Biomanufacturing Capacity. BioDesign Res 2022:9871087. 10.34133/2022/9871087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matsumoto K, i., Iijima M, Hori C, Utsunomia C, Ooi T, Taguchi S (2018) In Vitro Analysis of d-Lactyl-CoA-Polymerizing polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase in Polylactate and poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) syntheses. Biomacromolecules 19(7):2889–2895. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Medeiros Garcia Alcântara J, Distante F, Storti G, Moscatelli D, Morbidelli M, Sponchioni M (2020) Current trends in the production of biodegradable bioplastics: the case of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biotechnol Adv 42:107582. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morgan-Kiss RM, Cronan JE (2004) The Escherichia coli fadK (ydiD) gene encodes an anerobically regulated short chain acyl-CoA synthetase. J Biol Chem 279(36):37324–37333. 10.1074/jbc.M405233200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nduko JM, Matsumoto Ki, Ooi T, Taguchi S (2013) Effectiveness of xylose utilization for high yield production of lactate-enriched P(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) using a lactate-overproducing strain of Escherichia coli and an evolved lactate-polymerizing enzyme. Metab Eng 15:159–166. 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nduko JM, Matsumoto Ki, Ooi T, Taguchi S (2014) Enhanced production of poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) from xylose in engineered Escherichia coli overexpressing a galactitol transporter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(6):2453–2460. 10.1007/s00253-013-5401-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Niu W, Guo J (2015) Stereospecific Microbial Conversion of Lactic Acid into 1,2-Propanediol. ACS Synth Biol 4(4):378–382. 10.1021/sb500240p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Niu W, Kramer L, Mueller J, Liu K, Guo J (2019) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the de novo stereospecific biosynthesis of 1,2-propanediol through lactic acid. Metabolic Eng Commun 8:e00082. 10.1016/j.mec.2018.e00082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Okano H, Hermsen R, Hwa T (2021) Hierarchical and simultaneous utilization of carbon substrates: mechanistic insights, physiological roles, and ecological consequences. Curr Opin Microbiol 63:172–178. 10.1016/j.mib.2021.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Park H, He H, Yan X, Liu X, Scrutton NS, Chen G-Q (2024) PHA is not just a bioplastic! Biotechnol Adv 71:108320. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rangarajan ES, Li Y, Ajamian E, Iannuzzi P, Kernaghan SD, Fraser ME, Cygler M, Matte A (2005) Crystallographic trapping of the glutamyl-CoA thioester intermediate of family I CoA transferases. J Biol Chem 280(52):42919–42928. 10.1074/jbc.M510522200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ren J-y, Liu G, Chen Y-f, Jiang S, Ma Y-r, Zheng P, Guo X-w, Xiao D-g (2020) Enhanced production of ethyl lactate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by genetic modification. J Agric Food Chem 68(47):13863–13870. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shi M, Li M, Yang A, Miao X, Yang L, Pandhal J, Zou H (2022) Class I polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) synthase increased polylactic acid production in engineered Escherichia coli. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.919969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  37. Taguchi S, Yamada M, Matsumoto Ki, Tajima K, Satoh Y, Munekata M, Ohno K, Kohda K, Shimamura T, Kambe H, Obata S (2008) A microbial factory for lactate-based polyesters using a lactate-polymerizing enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(45):17323–17327. 10.1073/pnas.0805653105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tan C, Tao F, Xu P (2022) Direct carbon capture for the production of high-performance biodegradable plastics by cyanobacterial cell factories. Green Chem 24(11):4470–4483. 10.1039/D1GC04188F [Google Scholar]
  39. Volodina E, Schürmann M, Lindenkamp N, Steinbüchel A (2014) Characterization of propionate CoA-transferase from Ralstonia eutropha H16. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(8):3579–3589. 10.1007/s00253-013-5222-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang L, Yuan H, Li W, Yan P, Zhao M, Li Z, Zhao H, Wang S, Wan R, Li Y, Yang J, Pan X, Rosas I, Yu G (2024) ACSS3 regulates the metabolic homeostasis of epithelial cells and alleviates pulmonary fibrosis. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Mol Basis Disease 1870(2):166960. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei X, Wu J, Guo P, Zhou S, Wu H (2021) Effect of short-chain thioesterase deficiency on P(3HB-co-LA) biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Chin J Biotechnol 37(1):196–206. 10.13345/j.cjb.200243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu J, Wei X, Guo P, He A, Xu J, Jin M, Zhang Y, Wu H (2021) Efficient poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-lactate) production from corn stover hydrolysate by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Bioresour Technol 341:125873. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu J, Gong X, Sun X, Guo P, Luo Y, Wu H (2023) Fine-tuning biosynthesis of biodegradable poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-lactate) with different ratios of d-lactate from xylose by engineered Escherichia coli. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11(41):15043–15051. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c03930 [Google Scholar]
  44. Yamada M, Matsumoto Ki, Uramoto S, Motohashi R, Abe H, Taguchi S (2011) Lactate fraction dependent mechanical properties of semitransparent poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate)s produced by control of lactyl-CoA monomer fluxes in recombinant Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 154(4):255–260. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang TH, Kim TW, Kang HO, Lee S-H, Lee EJ, Lim S-C, Oh SO, Song A-J, Park SJ, Lee SY (2010) Biosynthesis of polylactic acid and its copolymers using evolved propionate CoA transferase and PHA synthase. Biotechnol Bioeng 105(1):150–160. 10.1002/bit.22547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ylinen A, Maaheimo H, Anghelescu-Hakala A, Penttilä M, Salusjärvi L, Toivari M (2021) Production of D-lactic acid containing polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 48(5–6):kuab028. 10.1093/jimb/kuab028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yoshimura Y, Araki A, Maruta H, Takahashi Y, Yamashita H (2017) Molecular cloning of rat acss3 and characterization of mammalian propionyl-CoA synthetase in the liver mitochondrial matrix. J Biochem 161(3):279–289. 10.1093/jb/mvw067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yukesh Kannah R, Dinesh Kumar M, Kavitha S, Banu R, Kumar Tyagi J, Rajaguru V, P., Kumar G (2022) Production and recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) from waste streams – A review. Bioresour Technol 366:128203. 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang X, Mao Y, Wang B, Cui Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Chen T (2019) Screening, expression, purification and characterization of CoA-transferases for lactoyl-CoA generation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 46(7):899–909. 10.1007/s10295-019-02174-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhong W, Li H, Wang Y (2023) Design and construction of artificial biological systems for one-carbon utilization. BioDesign Res 5:0021. 10.34133/bdr.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (1.2MB, docx)

Articles from Bioresources and Bioprocessing are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES