SUMMARY
Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) may cause ischemia in the region of brainstem, parts of the thalamus, occipital lobes, and cerebellum, resulting in severe disability or mortality rate above 70%. Recurrent BAO has been described in only a small number of cases. We present a case of repeated mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the tip of basilar artery (BA) reocclusion within 24 hours. A previously healthy 37-year-old male presented with occipital headache, nausea, vomiting, right-sided hemiparesis, within 30 minutes from the onset and NIHSS 18. The patient was vaccinated against COVID-19 with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine seven days before the onset. On initial computed tomography (CT) scan, the pc-ASPECTS was 10 and CT angiography (CTA) showed the tip of BA thrombosis. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy was administered, followed by MT, achieving mTICI 3 and NIHSS 5 after the procedure. Within 24 hours from the first MT, there was neurological deterioration followed by coma. Urgent CT/CTA was performed and rethrombosis of BA was confirmed with pc-ASPECTS 10. MT was repeated with mTICI 2b. Stroke etiology was undetermined. After 17 days, the patient was discharged and referred to continue rehabilitation treatment. After 90 days of stroke, his NIHSS was 2 and mRS 1. We can consider that early recurrent BAO can be successfully treated with repeated MT.
Key words: Basilar artery occlusion, pc-ASPECT score, Mechanical thrombectomy, Thrombolysis
Introduction
Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) may cause ischemia in the region of brainstem, parts of the thalamus, occipital lobes, and cerebellum, resulting in severe disability or mortality rate above 70%. The possible manifestations of stroke in these regions are a disturbance of the state of consciousness up to coma, quadriplegia, dysphagia, dysarthria, ‘locked-in syndrome’ and very often death (1, 2). Headaches occur in approximately 2% of cases. Nausea and vomiting can occur with strokes in the brain-stem or cerebellum (3). Patients with acute BAO have a fatal outcome in 85%-97% of cases, if they are untreated (4). The use of intravenous thrombolytic therapy (ITT), as well as mechanical thrombectomy (MT) significantly increase the chances for a favorable outcome in such patients (5). The risk of repeated stroke in survivors of BAO is estimated at 10%-15% (6). Recurrent BAO is described in only a small number of cases, and the etiology of such strokes in most of those cases is not clearly established (7, 8). Repeated ITT is safe and effective in recurrent stroke, while data on repeated MT in large vessel occlusions are still scarce and limited to a few case reports (9, 10). Since MT can damage the endothelium of a blood vessel, there is reasonable suspicion that this method of treatment may lead to repeated acute occlusion of a previously recanalized artery (11).
Case Report
A previously healthy 37-year-old male presented with occipital headache, nausea, vomiting, as well as weakness of the right limbs, which had occurred 30 minutes before presenting to the neurological emergency room. The patient was vaccinated against COVID-19 with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine seven days before the onset. At admission, the patient was somnolent, and neurological examination revealed dysarthric speech, convergent strabismus, miotic pupils, right-sided central facial palsy, with right hemiplegia (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 18). Initial computed tomography (CT) scan did not show acute parenchymal lesions (posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score [pc-ASPECTS] 10), while CT angiography (CTA) showed thrombosis of the tip of basilar artery (BA) and left posterior cerebral artery in the length of about 7 mm (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Initial computed tomography (CT) scan with CT angiography: pc-ASPECTS 10 with hyperdense basilar artery sign (A) and filling defect in the distal aspect of basilar artery and left posterior cerebral artery (B).
Intravenous thrombolytic therapy was administered with the onset to treatment time of 64 minutes (door to needle time 34 minutes), followed by MT with aspiration catheter through the right common femoral artery (CFA) with the onset to groin puncture time of 106 minutes (door to groin puncture time 76 minutes). Full reperfusion of BA was achieved at 129 minutes after onset with modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Pre-interventional digital subtraction angiography (A); evacuated clot (B); post-interventional digital subtraction angiography with full recanalization, mTICI 3 (C).
The patient had neurological improvement after the procedure, with mild right-sided hemiparesis, NIHSS 5. On the next day, after 17 hours from the first MT, there was sudden neurological deterioration, which led to coma with decerebrating movements, for which the patient was immediately intubated. Urgent control CT scan was performed, and there was no visible parenchymal damage, pc-ASPECTS 10 (Fig. 3A). Because of suspicion of recurrent BAO, CTA was performed, and BAO was confirmed, 2 cm in length, and small filling defects in both posterior cerebral arteries (Fig. 3B, C). A new endovascular procedure with MT was performed with aspiration catheter through the left CFA. Successful recanalization was achieved again (mTICI 2b) (Fig. 3D).
Fig. 3.
Control computed tomography scan with angiography, pre- and post-interventional digital subtraction angiography: hyperdense basilar artery sign with pcASPECTS 10 (A); filling defect in the middle part of basilar artery (B); pre-interventional digital subtraction angiography of basilar artery reocclusion performed 17 hours after first basilar artery occlusion (C); post-interventional digital subtraction angiography with mTICI 2b recanalization (D).
After the intervention, the patient had a favorable neurological recovery and was extubated the next day. On follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging showed bilateral acute ischemic lesions in the cerebellum, as well as acute ischemic lesions in the inner part of the left temporal lobe and left pulvinar. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) did not detect reocclusion of intracranial arteries, and based on the findings of the MRA axial section sequence of fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, no intra- or extracranial dissection of cerebral arteries was observed (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing hyperintense changes in both hemispheres of the cerebellum (A), left inferior (B) and middle temporal gyrus (C) on the FLAIR sequence; MRI angiography without stenotic changes and signs of occlusion of large vessels (D).
In the further course of hospitalization, the patient underwent thorough cardiological examination. Transcranial doppler bubble test was negative. Echocardiography was normal without the existence of a right-left shunt. There was no atrial fibrillation detected on 24-hour Holter monitoring. Laboratory analyses, including thrombophilia markers and immunologic analyses, were negative. The existence of neuroinfection, including syphilis, was excluded. Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) was considered the cause of repeated stroke, and aspirin was prescribed for secondary prevention. After 17 days, the patient was discharged and referred to continue rehabilitation treatment. At discharge, he had NIHSS 5, but modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3. At follow-up, 90 days after the stroke, the patient was independent and neurological examination showed discrete dysarthria and mild weakness of the right leg, NIHSS 2 and mRS 1.
Discussion
We present a case of repeated BAO, successfully treated with MT twice within 17 hours. In the literature, several cases of recurrent thrombosis of a large blood vessel successfully treated with repeated MT without major complications and with a beneficial effect have already been described (7, 10-12). These case reports suggest that repeated MT could be considered feasible and safe, if there are indications for it and if the repeated intervention is approached immediately after recognition of symptoms of reocclusion. However, repeated MT for the tip of BA reocclusion within 24 hours has not been described yet. In 2022, two studies were published about BAO treatment, conducted in the Asian population. In these studies, patients were treated with MT in an extended time window of up to 12 (ATTENTION) to 24 (BAOCHE) hours from the onset of symptoms. Patients were selected based on the pc-ASPECTS, which had to be greater than 6. These studies showed a statistically significant superiority of the endovascular treatment compared to the use of standard medical treatment (SMT) including ITT in BAO (13, 14). A meta-analysis by Xu et al. analyzing these two studies with BEST and BASICS studies showed definitive superiority of MT in the treatment of BAO compared to SMT (15). All these results suggest that patients with BAO should be considered for MT within the first 24 hours of the onset if there are no clear contraindications. Considering that the second BAO in our patient occurred after 17 hours from the first MT, the pc-ASPECTS 10 on repeated CT scan was the main reason for deciding to repeat the endovascular procedure.
In our case, the etiology of recurrent BAO remained undetermined, arterial dissection was not proven and ESUS was considered as the mechanism of recurrent stroke (cryptogenic stroke). In the literature, there are data that could indicate a connection between the administration of the vaccine against COVID-19 and development of thromboembolic events. An English self-controlled case series study indicated an increased risk of cerebrovascular events (cerebral venous thrombosis, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke) in those vaccinated (AstraZeneca and Pfizer-BioNTech) against COVID-19 (16). However, a recently published study conducted at our institution showed that outcomes after ischemic stroke were not significantly different in previously vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients (17).
It is concluded that early recurrent BAO can be successfully treated with repeated MT in properly selected patients.
References
- 1.Yu W, Higashida RT. Endovascular thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion: latest findings and critical thinking on future study design. Transl Stroke Res. 2022. December;13(6):913–22. 10.1007/s12975-022-01008-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siow I, Tan BYQ, Lee KS, Ong N, Toh E, Gopinathan A, et al. Bridging thrombolysis versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in stroke due to basilar artery occlusion. J Stroke. 2022;24(1):128–37. 10.5853/jos.2021.02082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Demarin V, Lovrenčić-Huzjan A, Trkanjec Z, Vuković V, Vargek Solter V, Šerić V, et al. Recommendations for stroke management 2006 Update. Acta Clin Croat. 2006;45(3):219–85. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lindsberg PJ, Sairanen T, Strbian D, Kaste M. Current treatment of basilar artery occlusion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1268:35–44. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06687.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ritvonen J, Sairanen T, Silvennoinen H, Virtanen P, Salonen O, Lindsberg PJ, et al. Outcomes and long-term mortality after basilar artery occlusion – a cohort with up to 20 years’ follow-up. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28:816–22. 10.1111/ene.14628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reinemeyer NE, Tadi P, Lui F. Basilar artery thrombosis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. PMID: 30335274. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532241/ [PubMed]
- 7.Leber SL, Fandler-Höfler S, Kneihsl M, Augustin M, Deutschmann H, Gattringer T. Case report: Four early recurrent basilar artery occlusions successfully treated with mechanical thrombectomy and subsequent vertebral artery coil occlusion. Front Neurol. 2021;12:698488. 10.3389/fneur.2021.698488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chiti A, Pizzanelli C, Terni E, Gino G, Cosottini M, Puglioli M, et al. A case of recurrent basilar artery occlusion successfully treated with repeated intravascular procedures. Neurologist. 2011;17:95–7. 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181e5ec33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qureshi AI, Malik AA, Freese M, Thompson MJ, Khan AA, Suri MFK. Readministration of intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients: case series and systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33:307.e1–4. 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bouslama M, Haussen DC, Rebello LC, Grossberg JA, Frankel MR, Nogueira RG. Repeated mechanical thrombectomy in recurrent large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neurol. 2017;6:1–7. 10.1159/000447754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ikenberg B, Rösler J, Seifert CL, Wunderlich S, Kaesmacher J, Zimmer C, et al. Etiology of recurrent large vessel occlusions treated with repeated thrombectomy. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020;26(2):195.204. doi: 10.1177/1591019919892126. 10.1177/1591019919892126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Fandler S, Deutschmann H, Fazekas F, Gattringer T. Repeated endovascular treatment of early recurrent proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion: case report and brief review of the literature. Front Neurol. 2018;9:289. 10.3389/fneur.2018.00289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tao C, Li R, Zhu Y, Qun S, Xu P, Wang L, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (ATTENTION). Int J Stroke. 2022;17(7):815–9. 10.1177/17474930221077164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li C, Wu C, Wu L, Zhao W, Chen J, Ren M, et al. Basilar Artery Occlusion Chinese Endovascular Trial: Protocol for a prospective randomized controlled study. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(6):694–7. 10.1177/17474930211040923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu J, Chen X, Chen S, Cao W, Zhao H, Ni W, et al. Endovascular treatment for basilar artery occlusion: a meta-analysis. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023. February;8(1):1–3. Epub 2022 Aug 5. 10.1136/svn-2022-001740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hippisley-Cox J, Patone M, Mei XW, Saatci D, Dixon S, Khunti K, et al. Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study. BMJ. 2021;374:n1931. 10.1136/bmj.n1931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stamenković M, Radmilo Lj, Jovičević M, Rabi-Žikić T, Žarkov M, Ružika-Kaloci S, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute ischemic stroke previously vaccinated against COVID-19. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31:106483. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]