Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 18;481:116763. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2023.116763

In vitro and in vivo approaches to assess atherosclerosis following exposure to low-dose mixtures of arsenic and cadmium

Nivetha K Subramaniam a,c, Natascha Gagnon c, Kiran Makhani a,c, Nikola Kukolj b,c, Michael H Mouradian b, Braeden H Giles b,c, Harinee Srikannan c, Victoria Fruh d, Jaymie Meliker e, Gregory A Wellenius f, Koren K Mann a,b,c,*
PMCID: PMC11414205  NIHMSID: NIHMS2022942  PMID: 37980961

Abstract

Worldwide, millions of people are co-exposed to arsenic and cadmium. Environmental exposure to both metals is linked with a higher risk of atherosclerosis. While studies have characterized the pro-atherosclerotic effects of arsenic and cadmium as single agents, little is known about the potential effects of metal mixtures, particularly at low doses. Here, we used a combination of in vitro and in vivo models to assess the effects of low-dose metals individually and as mixtures on early events and plaque development associated with atherosclerosis. In vitro, we investigated early pro-atherogenic changes in macrophages and endothelial cells with metal treatments. The combined cytotoxic effects of both metals at low concentrations were dose interactive, specifically, synergistic in macrophages, but antagonistic in endothelial cells. Despite this differential behavior across cell types, the mixtures did not initiate early pro-atherogenic events: neither reactive oxygen species generation in macrophages nor adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells. In vivo, we utilized the well-characterized hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein E knock-out (ApoE−/−) mouse model. Previously, we have shown that low concentrations of arsenic (down to 10 ppb) enhance atherosclerosis in ApoE−/−mice. This model has also been used with cadmium to demonstrate pro-atherogenic effects, although at concentrations above human-relevant exposures. In both sexes, there are some small increases in atherosclerotic lesion size, but very few changes in plaque constituents in the ApoE−/−mouse model. Together, these results suggests that low-dose metal mixtures are not significantly more pro-atherogenic than either metal alone.

Keywords: Arsenic, Cadmium, Low-Dose, Mixtures, Atherosclerosis

1. Introduction

Environmental exposure to metals, such as arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd), have been associated with higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerosis (Lamas et al., 2023). Atherosclerosis is a vascular disease characterized by the buildup of fibro-fatty plaque in the inner lining of an artery. Atherosclerotic plaque development begins with the perturbation of endothelial function (Gimbrone Jr. et al., 2000) by excess oxidized lipid followed by monocyte/macrophage recruitment, infiltration and differentiation. These myeloid cells then engulf the oxidized lipid, forming foam cells, and initiate an inflammatory cascade (Moore and Tabas, 2011). This leads to the first stage in plaque development, the formation of a fatty streak (Douglas and Channon, 2014). The continued recruitment of leukocytes further promotes lipoprotein retention, extracellular matrix alteration and sustained chronic inflammation. As the atherosclerotic lesion progresses, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) migrate, proliferate to secrete extracellular matrix and form a protective fibrous cap (Harman and Jørgensen, 2019). In advanced stages, the apoptosis and defective efferocytosis of macrophages (Tabas, 2010) and VSMCs (Harman and Jørgensen, 2019) contribute to plaque necrosis. Plaques with large necrotic cores and thin fibrous caps are prone to rupture and cause myocardial infarction (Virmani et al., 2006).

Millions of people are exposed to arsenic and cadmium worldwide. Although combined metal exposure is derived from multiple sources, one of the primary sources of arsenic exposure is contaminated drinking water (Chung et al., 2014). The World Health Organization (WHO) has set the maximum contaminant level of arsenic in drinking water at 10 ppb (World Health, 2019). Nevertheless, higher arsenic levels have been reported in Brazil (Mirlean et al., 2014), Bangladesh (Chakraborti et al., 2010), India (Shukla et al., 2010), Cambodia (Sthiannopkao et al., 2008), Chile (Nriagu et al., 2007), Spain (Gómez et al., 2006), Thailand (Santha et al., 2022) and United States (Naujokas et al., 2013). Cadmium is a metal with a long biological half-life in the human body ranging from 15 to 30 years (Rafati Rahimzadeh et al., 2017). The main sources of Cd exposure for non-smoking and non-occupationally exposed individuals, are diet, air and groundwater (Kubier et al., 2019; Tinkov et al., 2018). The WHO set the maximum contaminant level of Cd in drinking water at 3 ppb (World Health, 2004). In general, low levels (0.2 to 2 ppb) of Cd have been reported in groundwater, for instance, in the western part of United States (Ayotte et al., 2011) and Northern Germany (Rodemann et al., 1983). However, there are some regions where levels greater than the WHO-set limit of Cd have been reported. For example, some waste sites in the United States have greater levels, as a result of both natural and anthropogenic processes (Kubier et al., 2019). Furthermore, arsenic and Cd are often found together in mines, agricultural systems, and industrial wastewater discharges (Gunadasa et al., 2023; Arancibia-Miranda et al., 2020). More importantly, both metals are reported to co-contaminate drinking water supply systems (Gao et al., 2019; Sierra-Sánchez et al., 2022; Oseghe et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2023). This, combined with exposure from other sources, means that exposure to low levels of metal mixture is profound.

Metals can affect multiple points along the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (Grau-Perez et al., 2022). Both arsenic and Cd are pro-atherogenic. Mechanistic evidence suggests that arsenic induces endothelial dysfunction, increases reactive oxygen species, impairs nitric oxide balance, and amongst other pro-atherogenic properties, all of which enhance atherogenesis (States et al., 2009). On a similar note, Cd targets the vascular endothelium, induces endothelial dysfunction via modulation of adhesion molecules (Prozialeck et al., 2006) and reduces nitric oxide bioavailability (Kolluru et al., 2006). Moreover, both arsenic and Cd enhance atherosclerosis in the well-characterized, hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein E knock-out (ApoE−/−) mouse model as single agents. We have previously shown that low concentrations of arsenic (down to 10 ppb) induce atherosclerosis in ApoE−/−mice (Makhani et al., 2018). In addition, Cd has pro-atherogenic effects in ApoE−/−mice, although at concentrations above human-relevant exposures (Oliveira et al., 2019). Thus, both arsenic and Cd can enhance the development of atherosclerosis.

While studies have characterized the effects of arsenic and Cd as single agents, many of these studies, particularly for Cd, have utilized concentrations well above environmentally-relevant doses. Moreover, these studies have not characterized the effects of mixtures of metals, more closely mimicking the complex environments we are all exposed to. Here, we used a combination of in vitro and in vivo approaches to study the effects of low-dose arsenic/Cd as single agents and as mixtures on early events and plaque development associated with atherosclerosis. In vitro, we investigated early pro-atherogenic changes in macrophages and endothelial cells with metal treatments. In vivo, we utilized low-dose, environmentally-relevant concentrations of arsenic, Cd and the co-exposure in the ApoE−/−mice and considered sex as a biological variable.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cell viability assay

RAW 264.7 (ATCC-TIB-71) murine macrophages and C166 (ATCC CRL-2581) murine endothelial cells were routinely cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) media at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The range of concentrations chosen for each metal are as follows: 10 nM – 5μM arsenic and 10 nM – 10 μM Cd, ranges encompassing both low environmental and higher in vitro concentrations. Arsenic, cadmium and mixture working solutions were prepared from sodium arsenite and cadmium chloride stock solutions, respectively, and solubilized with deionized water. The cells were seeded in a 96-well plate and cultured with the metal treatments for 24 h. The cytotoxicity in each cell type were determined using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. CellTiter-Glo staining measures the number of viable cells in culture based on quantitation of the ATP present, an indicator of metabolically active cells. Synergy was assessed by excess over bliss (EOB) analysis (Borisy et al., 2003).

2.2. High-content imaging

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in PhenoPlate 96-well microplates (Perkin Elmer) coated with 10 μg/ml poly-d-lysine (ThermoFisher) at a seeding density of 4000 cells/well. The cells were exposed to arsenic and cadmium treatments for 24 h. Menadione was used as a positive control. Following the metal exposures, the RAW 264.7 cells were treated with cell permeable fluorescent dyes for live-cell imaging. These dyes include CellROX Deep Red reagent (ThermoFisher) for reactive oxygen species detection, CellMask Green (ThermoFisher) for plasma membrane stain and Hoechst (ThermoFisher) for nuclear stain. Cells were stained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 30 min. The Operetta High-Content Imaging System (Perkin Elmer) was used for live-cell imaging (9 fields/well, 4 planes/well, 40× magnification). The images were then analyzed using the Columbus Image Data Storage and Analysis System (Perkin Elmer).

2.3. Flow cytometry

C166 (ATCC CRL-2581) murine endothelial cells were seeded in a 12-well plate at a seeding density of 100 000 cells/well and treated with arsenic and/or cadmium for 4 h or 24 h. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used as the positive control. Post treatment, cells were harvested with trypsin and washed with 1× phosphate buffered saline. Cells were then stained with anti-mouse CD106 (VCAM-1) (ThermoFisher) and Near-IR Live/Dead (ThermoFisher). The BD FACSCanto II Flow Cytometer (Lady Davis Institute Flow Cytometry Core) was used to measure the mean fluorescence intensity of VCAM-1 positive cells. FlowJo v10 was used for analysis.

2.4. Incucyte live-cell analysis system

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in PhenoPlate 96-well microplates (Perkin Elmer) at a seeding density of 3000 cells/well. The cells were exposed to arsenic and cadmium treatments for 24 h on day 2. GW3965, a synthetic LXR agonist, was used as a control. Following the metal exposures, cells were incubated with 2.5 μg/ml red-orange Dil dye-labeled oxLDL (Dil-oxLDL) (ThermoFisher) for 4 h. The cells were imaged in the S3 Incucyte Imaging System (Sartorius) and the mean Dil-OxLDL intensity was recorded every 30 min in real time.

2.5. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded in a 6 well plate at a seeding density of 200 000 cells/well. The cells were treated with arsenic and cadmium treatments for 24 h on day 2. LPS was used as a positive control. Following the metal exposure, the supernatant was collected and snap frozen. TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 were quantified in the conditioned media using R&D DuoSet ELISAs for TNF-α (DY410–05), IL-1β (DY401–05), and IL-6 (DY406–05). Optical density (OD) values were calculated by subtracting the OD 540 nm from the OD 450 nm.

2.6. In vivo arsenic and cadmium exposure

All mouse studies were approved by the McGill Animal Care and Use Committee. ApoE−/−mice (B6.129P2—apoEtm1Unc/J from Jackson Laboratory) were bred in the Lady Davis Institute Animal Facility. Starting at 5 weeks of age, male and female ApoE−/−mice were given low arsenic/cadmium chow (AIN-76; Envigo, Lachine, Quebec). Mice were exposed to tap water sodium arsenite (5 or 50 ppb arsenic), cadmium chloride (1.5 or 5 ppb cadmium), or the combinations for 13 weeks. Arsenic/cadmium drinking water was changed three times per week. Body weight was monitored. At endpoint, mice were euthanized with isoflurane, and the aortas and hearts were dissected.

2.7. Atherosclerotic lesion characterization

The size and characterization of the atherosclerotic lesions in the aorta and aortic sinus were assessed as previously described (Lemaire et al., 2011; Makhani et al., 2018). In short, the fixed aorta was rinsed with ultrapure water, then cut longitudinally and stained en face with oil red O (Electronic Microscopy Sciences) for triglycerides, lipids and cholesterol. Images were obtained using INFINITYCAPTURE software and camera (Lumenera). The percentage of lesion area of the aortic arch, defined as the region from the first intercostal arteries to the ascending arch, were evaluated using ImageJ software [National Institutes of Health (NIH)]. The atherosclerotic lesions were also evaluated within the aortic sinus. A total of 8 animals were used for both analyses for each treatment and sex. The hearts were rinsed, fixed, embedded, and processed as previously described (Lemaire et al., 2011; Makhani et al., 2018). Approximately 7 μm cryosections were sliced from the aortic base throughout the aortic sinus, and consecutive sections were collected on 10 different slides. On average, 4–9 slices were collected on each slide, and each slice was about 70 μm apart. Individual slides were stained with oil red O to determine the plaque areas and their lipid content. The aortic sinuses were also stained and analyzed for collagen content (type I and type III) using picrosirius red (Polysciences).

2.8. In situ immunofluorescence

Smooth muscle cell (SMC) and macrophage content were assessed within the plaque area as previously described (Lemaire et al., 2011; Makhani et al., 2018). In short, aortic sinus sections were rinsed and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated with primary antibody [1:100 for monoclonal anti-α-smooth muscle cell actin [clone 1A4], 1:50 for MOMA-2 (macrophages) antibody (Abcam)], rinsed, and incubated with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (1:500; Invitrogen). The immunofluorescent marker from at least 4–9 sections per animal were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH) and expressed as a percentage of total lesion area.

2.9. Plasma analyses

Blood (0.6 mL) was collected by cardiac puncture and plasma was obtained using collection tubes (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid BD Vacutainer SST). Cholesterol, high-(HDL) and low-density (LDL) lipoproteins, triglycerides, and glucose were assessed by the pathology services at The Centre of Phenogenomics in Toronto, Ontario.

2.10. Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad software (La Jolla, California) using a one-way ANOVA and a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. A two-sided p <0. 05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical test is indicated in figure legends where applicable.

3. Results

3.1. In vitro assessment of early proatherogenic changes following low dose As/Cd mixtures

Previous data indicate that both arsenic and Cd have pro-atherogenic properties, however, it is unclear whether these extend to low concentrations and/or to the mixture of the two metals. We used in vitro approaches to study the effects of exposure to mixtures of arsenic and Cd and focused on early events in atherogenesis: reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in macrophages (Xu et al., 2019), the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells (Xu et al., 2019; Gimbrone Jr. and García-Cardeña, 2016; Insull Jr., 2009), oxidized lipoprotein uptake in macrophages and release of cytokines (Crowther, 2005; Gaggini et al., 2023). First, we determined the cell viability following metal exposure, for single metal exposures or for combined metal exposures, in either RAW 264.7 murine macrophages or C166 endothelial cells after 24 h. We tested a broad range of concentrations for both metals from 0.01 to 5 μM arsenic and 0.01–10 μM Cd. In RAW macrophages, Cd exposure singularly resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in viability, while, interestingly, arsenic exposure singularly increased viability until 1 μM (Fig. 1A & Table S1). The combination of metals resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cytotoxicity reaching a maximum of ~60% viability. In the C166 endothelial cells, each metal alone resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in viability with arsenic being more cytotoxic (Fig. 1B & Table S1). The As/Cd combinations decreased cell viability, although not more than ~15%, indicating that the endothelial cells are more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of arsenic and Cd, individually and together. The excess over bliss (EOB) independence model (Bansal et al., 2014) was used to determine synergy/antagonism between arsenic and Cd in both the RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 1C & Table S2) and the C166 cells (Fig. 1D & Table S2). A compound pair with positive EOB values depicts synergistic behavior, while negative EOB values depict antagonistic behavior, and an EOB value of 0 corresponds to an additive effect. Interestingly, here, mixtures of low-dose arsenic and Cd behave differently in macrophages than in endothelial cells. The effect of both metals combined at low concentrations appears to be dose interactive, specifically, synergistic in the RAW cells (Fig. 1C) but antagonistic in the C166 cells (Fig. 1D). However, in both cell lines, no statistically significant differences were found in cell viability and in EOB using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s post-hoc test after low-dose metal treatments for 24 h. To reduce the confounding cytotoxicity in downstream analyses, we focused on concentration mixtures that yielded >75% viability.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Differential sensitivity to low-dose metal mixtures in RAW 264.7 macrophages and C166 endothelial cells. The combined effect of both metals is synergistic in RAW 264.7 cells whereas antagonistic in C166 cells. The mean percent cell viability (n = 3) in RAW 264.7 cells (A) and C166 cells (B) after arsenic and cadmium treatments for 24 h. Cell viability was measured as a change in CellTiter-Glo luminescent signal, blue regions correspond to increased cell viability whereas red regions correspond to decreased cell viability. Mean excess over bliss analysis (n = 3) in RAW 264.7 cells (C) and C166 cells (D), red regions illustrate synergy amongst arsenic and cadmium whereas green regions illustrate antagonism. No statistical differences were observed in cell viability and in excess over bliss in both cell lines. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

As a first approach to study pro-atherogenic mechanisms, we measured the levels of ROS in macrophages after treatment with metal mixtures. We cultured RAW 264.7 murine macrophages with the experimentally determined non-cytotoxic concentrations of arsenic and Cd for 24 h and assessed superoxide production by high content imaging. Menadione was used as a positive control, where the ROS level significantly increased in the RAW 264.7 cells after 24 h exposure with menadione but not 1 h (Fig. 2A). With higher concentrations of arsenic, Cd and in combinations, there is an increase in ROS, although not statistically significant (p = .069–0.6501). Next, we measured VCAM-1 expression in C166 cells after low-dose metal treatments at 4 h and 24 h using flow cytometry. LPS was used as a positive control, which increased VCAM-1 expression after 4 h. However, at neither time point was VCAM-1 expression changed after arsenic and Cd exposure (Fig. 2B & S1). Then, we measured Dil-oxLDL uptake in RAW 264.7 cells after 24 h exposure to arsenic, Cd and in combinations over time (Fig. 2C). There was no change in the rate of lipid uptake (per hour) with arsenic treatment. However, Cd exposure (0.5 μM and 1 μM Cd) significantly decreased the rate of lipid updake alone and in some of the combinations compared to controls or arsenic. More interestingly, in some of the combinations, the addition of arsenic to 0.5 μM or 1 μM Cd did not alter the decreased rate of lipid uptake compared to Cd alone (Fig. 2C & Table S3). As an indication for vascular inflammation, we also measured cytokines promoting atherogenesis, TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 (Tousoulis et al., 2016) in conditioned media after metal exposure to RAW 264.7 cells. There was no change in cytokine expression with arsenic, Cd, or the combinations, although the positive control (LPS) consistently induced cytokine production (Fig. 2D). While these data suggest that low-dose mixtures of arsenic/Cd did not initiate pro-atherogenic events, atherosclerosis is a complex, multi-factorial process and as such, we extended our analysis to an in vivo model.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

In vitro approaches to study atherosclerosis following exposure to low-dose arsenic and cadmium. (A) Intracellular ROS levels were measured and quantified as a change in CellROX Deep Red fluorescence signal by high content screening. Increased ROS levels are seen at higher concentrations of arsenic, cadmium and in combinations, although not statistically significant. Menadione was used as a positive control. Statistical significance is represented as follows: ****p < .0001. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the expression of VCAM-1 on C166 cells under low dose-arsenic and cadmium treatment over 4 h (n = 2). No changes were observed in VCAM-1 expression after low-dose metal treatments. (C) Dil-oxLDL uptake was measured in RAW cells after 24-h metal exposure (n = 3). At higher concentrations of cadmium, the rate of Dil-oxLDL uptake (per hour) was significantly reduced (represented in bold) singularly and in combinations compared to cells only. A two-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison test was done. Statistical significance is represented as follows: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 and ****p < .0001. (D) No change in TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 expression after exposure to arsenic and cadmium in RAW 264.7 cells. LPS was used as a positive control. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

3.2. In vivo assessment of plaque size in ApoE−/−mice exposed to low concentrations of as/cd mixtures

We have previously shown that in the ApoE−/−mouse model low to moderate levels of arsenic, 10–200 ppb (Makhani et al., 2018), increases the size of the atherosclerotic lesion in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, pro-atherogenic effects have been reported in the same model treated with 100 ppm Cd (Oliveira et al., 2019). Here, we utilized this well-characterized in vivo model of atherosclerosis to study low-dose, environmentally relevant exposures of arsenic and Cd as individual metals and as mixtures. We exposed both male and female ApoE−/−mice to tap water, arsenic (5 or 50 ppb), Cd (1.5 or 5 ppb), or the combinations for 13 weeks. This is a time point at which we have previously observed arsenic-enhanced plaque size (Makhani et al., 2018). At endpoint, we determined the size of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic arch by en face oil red O staining on the luminal side of the aorta.

In both sexes, there were some increases in the lesion size in the aortic arch (Fig. 3A). In males, 5 ppb Cd increased the lesion size significantly in the aortic arch (Fig. 3A, p < 0.05), while arsenic alone resulted in no statistically significant changes. On the other hand, in females, 50 ppb arsenic significantly increased the lesion size in the aortic arch (Fig. 3A, p < 0.05), which we have previously reported in males (Makhani et al., 2018). Of note, the metal combinations did not increase arch plaque size significantly in either males or females. Notably, in males, arsenic, Cd and/or the combinations of both metals did not significantly increase the size of the atherosclerotic plaque in the aortic sinus. On the contrary, in females, 50 ppb arsenic and some of the combinations significantly increased the lesion size in the aortic sinus (Fig. 3B, p < 0.05; p < .01; p < .0001).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Sex-specific differences in the size of atherosclerotic lesion in the aortic arch (A) and aortic sinus (B) after low-dose arsenic, cadmium, and co-exposure in ApoE−/−mice. All the plaques were smaller than those observed with higher concentrations of arsenic and/or high-fat diet. Plaque was quantified after oil red O staining and imaged using ImageJ. Each point represents a single mouse. Statistical significance is represented as follows: *p < .05; **p < .01; ****p < .0001. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

3.3. Assessment of plaque components following exposure to low concentrations of arsenic/cd mixtures

Previously, we reported that an exposure 10–200 ppb arsenic in ApoE−/−mice alters plaque composition towards a less stable phenotype with increased lipid content, decreased smooth muscle cells and decreased collagen content (Makhani et al., 2018). To assess the changes in plaque composition after low-dose metal exposure, we stained for these components, all of which play a role in plaque progression and regression. Here, we used oil red O staining to determine the change in lipid content in the plaque. In males, no significant changes were seen in lipid content. Interestingly, in females exposed to 5 ppb Cd, there was a decrease in lipid content, however, with the addition of 5 or 50 ppb arsenic, lipid levels were restored to control values (Fig. 4A, p < 0.05). Macrophages phagocytose lipids and become foam cells, which we assessed by MOMA-2 staining. In accordance with what we have observed historically (Makhani et al., 2018; Lemaire et al., 2011), no significant changes in macrophage numbers were observed across the exposure groups in both sexes (Fig. 4B), suggesting increased intracellular lipid retention in macrophages.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Few changes were observed in lipids and macrophages in plaques. No change in macrophage number in both sexes. Lipid content (A) and macrophage number (B) in the atherosclerotic plaque in the aortic sinus after low-dose arsenic, cadmium, and co-exposure in ApoE−/−mice. Plaque was quantified in the aortic sinus by oil red O (A) and MOMA-2 (B) staining using ImageJ. Each point represents a single mouse. Statistical significance is represented as follows: *p <. 05. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

In atherogenesis, smooth muscle cells migrate, proliferate in lesions, and form a protective fibrous cap during plaque progression. In addition, smooth muscle cells synthesize extracellular matrix components, such as collagen, to increase plaque stability. We determined the percent smooth muscle cells in aortic sinus sections by α-actin staining and quantitated the collagen content by picrosirius red staining. Here, in both males and females, very few changes were seen in smooth muscle cell and collagen content (Fig. 5). In addition, we quantified the size of the necrotic core in the plaque by hematoxylin and eosin staining to assess plaque vulnerability induced by each metal and mixtures. In accordance with all the other findings, the size of the necrotic core did not significantly change (Fig. 6). Similarly, no significant changes were seen in the circulating lipid levels (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides) or glucose in males or females (Table S4). Thus, our in vivo studies demonstrate that the combinations of low-dose arsenic and Cd are not significantly worse than either metal alone with very few changes in plaque constituents.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

No changes were observed in smooth muscle cells and collagen. Smooth muscle cells (A) and collagen (B) content in the atherosclerotic plaque in aortic sinus after low-dose arsenic, cadmium and co-exposure in ApoE−/−mice. Plaque was quantified by α-smooth muscle actin (A) and picrosirius red (B) staining and imaged using ImageJ. Each point represents a single mouse. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The size of the necrotic core in the atherosclerotic plaque did not change significantly in both male and female ApoE−/−mice after low-dose arsenic, cadmium, and co-exposures. Necrotic core was assessed from hematoxylin and eosin-stained aortic sinus sections and imaged using ImageJ. Each point represents a single mouse.

4. Discussion

Together, our in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that low-dose metal mixtures of arsenic and Cd are not significantly more pro-atherogenic than either metal singularly. We found there is differential sensitivity to mixtures of arsenic and Cd in RAW 264.7 and C166 cells in vitro. Interestingly, mixtures of low-dose arsenic and Cd have synergistic interactions in macrophages, but antagonistic interactions in endothelial cells. Despite these differential interactions between arsenic and Cd, at such doses, these metals did not increase ROS in macrophages or adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells as single agents or as mixtures in vitro. Previously done studies in RAW 264.7 cells with lower doses of Cd (10, 50 and 200 nM) have reported a dose-dependent and time dependent (24, 48 and 72 h) increase in lipid absorbance (Kumar et al., 2019). Here, at 0.05 μM (50 nM) Cd, we see an increase in lipid uptake at 24 h, although not statistically significant. In addition, exposure to higher concentrations of Cd decreased the rate of lipid uptake in RAW cells. More interestingly, higher concentrations of Cd suppressed arsenic-mediated lipid uptake in RAW 264.7 macrophages. In vivo, we see very few changes in plaque size and constituents in the ApoE−/−mouse model in both sexes. While in both sexes there are some increases in lesion size in both aortic arch (Fig. 3A) and aortic sinus (Fig. 3B), these changes do not exceed those caused by higher concentrations of arsenic or with high fat diet as previously observed (Lemaire et al., 2011; Makhani et al., 2018).

Previous in vitro studies have reported cell type-specific and dose-specific sensitivity to metal mixtures. In human keratinocytes, exposure to mixtures of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead at low concentrations stimulated growth (Bae et al., 2001). However, with increasing metal concentrations, the combined toxicity changed from additive to synergistic cytotoxicity, followed by antagonistic interactions at the highest mixture concentration (Bae et al., 2001). Supporting the antagonistic effects at the highest dose, cellular defence mechanisms were also enhanced with increased levels of glutathione and metallothionein (Bae et al., 2001). Similar differential interactions with increasing metal concentrations were reported after exposure to arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead in MCF 7 breast cancer cells (Klutse et al., 2009). These findings suggest that the nature of the interaction between metals and the combined toxicity may be concentration and cell dependent. In another study (Karri et al., 2018), the toxicity of lead, cadmium, arsenic, and methylmercury as single agents and as binary mixtures were assessed in HT-22 neuronal cells. In agreement to our findings in the endothelial cells, the cytotoxicity of the combination of arsenic and cadmium at low doses showed antagonistic effects in the neuronal cells (Karri et al., 2018). Thus, in addition to dose, cell type may also play a role in metal interactions in combined toxicity.

This study uses only murine cell lines, which could limit the breadth of applicability of the data. RAW 264.7 is a commonly used myeloid cell line shown to have stable macrophage-like phenotypic and functional characteristics until passage 30 (Taciak et al., 2018). All experiments with RAW 264.7 were carefully carried out with a passage number <30. Moreover, C166 cells are reported to exhibit normal endothelial characteristics. More importantly, they constitutively express murine VCAM-1 (Wang et al., 1996), therefore we chose to assess this adhesion molecule here amongst other pro-atherogenic cell surface markers. In addition to VCAM-1, VE-cadherin, a major determinant of endothelial cell contact integrity, (Vestweber, 2008) and caveolin-1 (Puddu et al., 2023) are other markers of endothelial cells involved in plaque progression. C166 cells do not express VE-cadherin or caveolin-1, therefore this was not studied here. However, previously done studies by Prozialeck and coworkers have reported that exposure to 100 nM (0.1 μM) Cd for 15 h caused a marked reduction in VE-cadherin at the cell-cell contacts in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (Prozialeck, 2000). With regards to arsenic exposure, at 24 h, a dose-dependent reductions in VE-cadherin was observed in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) at 1, 5 and 10 μM (Pereira et al., 2007). While this is interesting, we wanted to compare our in vitro studies with our mouse model hence we chose to work with murine cell line. Future studies including low-dose arsenic and cadmium exposure in a human cell line will be of interest.

Few studies have characterized the toxicological effects of arsenic and Cd as mixtures in vivo. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the pro-atherosclerotic outcomes in a mouse model after low-dose metal mixtures. In male rats, simultaneous intraperitoneal co-exposure to 10 mg/kg sodium arsenite and 2.6 mg/kg cadmium chloride altered the histopathology and the glutathione levels in various tissues produced by either metal alone. Interestingly, prior studies suggest that at a histopathological level, the acute toxicity of the combination is less toxic than cadmium alone in testes, whereas not readily apparent in liver and kidney (Díaz-Barriga et al., 1990). Thus, there is evidence of differential sensitivity to metals which differs across tissues. In relevance to cardiotoxicity, a follow-up study done in rats at the same doses showed that the combination of metals is more toxic in the heart tissue than either single metal (Yáñez et al., 1991). On a similar note, chronic exposure to the combination of 22.5 ppm arsenic in drinking water and 100 ppm Cd in diet exacerbated renal toxicity more than either metal alone in metallothionein-I/II null mice (Liu et al., 2000). These studies suggest that, in contrast to our findings, the mixture of arsenic and Cd is more toxic than the single metals. However, these studies were performed using higher doses and assessed different endpoints. Here, we were particularly interested in exposures at levels relevant to humans as defined based on approximate levels found in drinking water in the US population (Ravalli et al., 2022; Nigra et al., 2020). We also considered sex as a biological variable to extrapolate data to human populations. In both sexes at low doses, the combinations of arsenic and Cd are not worse than either metal singularly in the ApoE−/−mouse model. Together, our data show that low-dose exposure to mixtures of arsenic and Cd do not significantly increase atherosclerosis in a hyperlipidemic mouse model.

While the vascular system is a target of both arsenic and cadmium toxicity (Prozialeck et al., 2008), the lack of interaction in vivo may be explained by the differences in the biological fate and differences in pro-atherogenic mechanisms of both metals. Mammalian species have developed a mechanism to metabolize inorganic arsenic, where mice rapidly methylate and excrete arsenic. Cadmium bioaccumulates in mice (Tai et al., 2022) similar to humans. Thus, this may be a question of the concentrations utilized in our experimental design being too low. Perhaps at these low concentrations of Cd, chronic (>13 weeks) to near lifetime exposure may be needed to see significant Cd-induced proatherogenic effects alone or in combination with arsenic in a hyperlipidemic mouse model. Moreover, arsenic induces oxidative stress via production of ROS (Hu et al., 2020) whereas Cd competes with zinc, and binds to sulfhydryl groups which counteracts the antioxidant properties of glutathione, metallothionein and zinc superoxide dismutase (Bridges and Zalups, 2005; Lamas et al., 2023). The lack of cooperation by the metals is surprising, based on their non-overlapping mechanisms of ROS generation.

Our goal was to study human relevant concentrations of metal exposure in mice, however there are potential limitations to our in vivo study. First, we used a hyperlipidemic mouse model, although the mice were not fed a high-fat diet. Atherosclerotic lesions from animals fed the Western diet are more lipid-rich than regular diet (Getz and Reardon, 2006). Therefore, perhaps there may be pro-atherogenic effects after low-dose co-exposure to metal mixtures in the context of a Western diet. More importantly, mice metabolize inorganic arsenic much faster than humans. Mice are very efficient with arsenic methylation and have faster rates of urinary clearances of methylated metabolites (Vahter, 1999; Koller et al., 2020). Thus, equivalent exposures to human and mice may likely result in very different doses in both species. Considering the interspecies differences, it is possible that exposure to low-dose combinations of arsenic and Cd may produce more drastic effects on human tissue. Therefore, complementary human epidemiologic studies are needed to study mixtures of arsenic and Cd and risk of atherosclerotic-related outcomes at environmentally relevant concentrations of metal exposure.

Supplementary Material

Supplement

Acknowledgements

We thank Christian Young and Nicolas Audet for their help with flow cytometry and high content imaging. Special thanks to Sathyen A. Prabhu for his help with excess over bliss analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH/NIEHS VICTER grant (R01ES030938) and the Dr. Morris Karmazyn and Dr. Margaret P. Moffat fellowship in cardiovascular research (N.K.S.).

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Nivetha K. Subramaniam: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Natascha Gagnon: Investigation. Kiran Makhani: Investigation. Nikola Kukolj: Investigation. Michael H. Mouradian: Investigation. Braeden H. Giles: Investigation. Harinee Srikannan: Investigation. Victoria Fruh: Writing – review & editing. Jaymie Meliker: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Gregory A. Wellenius: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Koren K. Mann: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2023.116763.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Arancibia-Miranda Nicolás, Manquián-Cerda Karen, Pizarro Carmen, Maldonado Tamara, Suazo-Hernández Jonathan, Escudey Mauricio, Bolan Nanthi, Sarkar Binoy, 2020. Mechanistic insights into simultaneous removal of copper, cadmium and arsenic from water by iron oxide-functionalized magnetic imogolite nanocomposites. J. Hazard. Mater. 398, 122940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayotte JD, Gronberg JM, Apodaca LE, 2011. ’US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5059. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bae Dong-Soon, Gennings Chris, Carter Walter H. Jr., Yang Raymond S.H., Campain Julie A., 2001. Toxicological interactions among arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and Lead in human keratinocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 63, 132–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bansal Mukesh, Yang Jichen, Karan Charles, Menden Michael P., Costello James C., Tang Hao, Xiao Guanghua, Li Yajuan, Allen Jeffrey, Zhong Rui, Chen Beibei, Kim Minsoo, Wang Tao, Heiser Laura M., Realubit Ronald, Mattioli Michela, Alvarez Mariano J., Shen Yao, Abbuehl Jean-Paul, Allen Jeffrey, Altman Russ B., Balcome Shawn, Bansal Mukesh, Bell Ana, Bender Andreas, Berger Bonnie, Bernard Jonathan, Bieberich Andrew A., Borboudakis Giorgos, Califano Andrea, Chan Christina, Chen Beibei, Chen Ting-Huei, Choi Jaejoon, Coelho Luis Pedro, Costello James C., Creighton Chad J., Dampier Will, Davisson V. Jo, Deshpande Raamesh, Diao Lixia, Camillo Di, Barbara Dundar, Murat Ertel, Adam Cellworks Group, Gallahan Daniel, Goswami Chirayu P., Gottlieb Assaf, Gould Michael N., Goya Jonathan, Grau Michael, Gray Joe W., Heiser Laura M., Hejase Hussein A., Hoffmann Michael F., Homicsko Krisztian, Homilius Max, Hwang Woochang, Ijzerman Adriaan P., Kallioniemi Olli, Karacali Bilge, Karan Charles, Kaski Samuel, Kim Junho, Kim Minsoo, Krishnan Arjun, Lee Junehawk, Lee Young-Suk, Lenselink Eelke B., Lenz Peter, Li Lang, Li Jun, Li Yajuan, Liang Han, Mattioli Michela, Menden Michael P., Mpindi John-Patrick, Myers Chad L., Newton Michael A., Overington John P., Parkkinen Juuso, Prill Robert J., Peng Jian, Pestell Richard, Qiu Peng, Rajwa Bartek, Realubit Ronald, Sadanandam Anguraj, Saez-Rodriguez Julio, Sambo Francesco, Singer Dinah, Stolovitzky Gustavo, Sridhar Arvind, Sun Wei, Tang Hao, Toffolo Gianna M., Tozeren Aydin, Troyanskaya Olga G., Tsamardinos Ioannis, van Vlijmen Herman W.T., Wang Tao, Wang Wen, Wegner Joerg K., Wennerberg Krister, van Westen Gerard J.P., Xia Tian, Xiao Guanghua, Xie Yang, Yang Jichen, Yang Yang, Yao Victoria, Yuan Yuan, Zeng Haoyang, Zhang Shihua, Zhao Junfei, Zhou Jian, Zhong Rui, Gallahan Daniel, Singer Dinah, Saez-Rodriguez Julio, Xie Yang, Stolovitzky Gustavo, Califano Andrea, Community Nci-Dream, 2014. A community computational challenge to predict the activity of pairs of compounds. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1213–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borisy AA, Elliott PJ, Hurst NW, Lee MS, Lehar J, Price ER, Serbedzija G, Zimmermann GR, Foley MA, Stockwell BR, Keith CT, 2003. Systematic discovery of multicomponent therapeutics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 7977–7982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridges CC, Zalups RK, 2005. Molecular and ionic mimicry and the transport of toxic metals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 204, 274–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chakraborti D, Rahman MM, Das B, Murrill M, Dey S, Chandra Mukherjee S, Dhar RK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury UK, Roy S, Sorif S, Selim M, Rahman M, Quamruzzaman Q, 2010. Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: a 14-year study report. Water Res. 44, 5789–5802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chung JY, Yu SD, Hong YS, 2014. Environmental source of arsenic exposure. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 47, 253–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crowther Mark A., 2005. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Hematology 2005, 436–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Díaz-Barriga F, Llamas E, Mejía JJ, Carrizales L, Santoyo ME, Vega-Vega L, Yáñnez L, 1990. Arsenic-cadmium interaction in rats. Toxicology 64, 19 1–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Douglas Gillian, Channon Keith M., 2014. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Medicine 42, 480–484. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaggini Melania, Gorini Francesca, Vassalle Cristina, 2023. Lipids in atherosclerosis: pathophysiology and the role of calculated lipid indices in assessing cardiovascular risk in patients with hyperlipidemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gao Jiali, Liu Quanli, Song Laizhou, Shi Baoyou, 2019. Risk assessment of heavy metals in pipe scales and loose deposits formed in drinking water distribution systems. Sci. Total Environ. 652, 1387–1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Getz Godfrey S., Reardon Catherine A., 2006. Diet and murine atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26, 242–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gimbrone MA Jr., García-Cardeña G, 2016. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 118, 620–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gimbrone MA Jr., Topper JN, Nagel T, Anderson KR, Garcia-Cardeña G, 2000. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 902, 230–9; discussion 39–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gómez JJ, Lillo J, Sahún B, 2006. Naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater and identification of the geochemical sources in the Duero Cenozoic Basin, Spain. Environ. Geol. 50, 1151–1170. [Google Scholar]
  18. Grau-Perez M, Caballero-Mateos MJ, Domingo-Relloso A, Navas-Acien A, Gomez-Ariza JL, Garcia-Barrera T, Leon-Latre M, Soriano-Gil Z, Jarauta E, Cenarro A, Moreno-Franco B, Laclaustra M, Civeira F, Casasnovas JA, Guallar E, Tellez-Plaza M, 2022. Toxic metals and subclinical atherosclerosis in carotid, femoral, and coronary vascular territories: the Aragon workers health study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 42, 87–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunadasa Sajanee G., Tighe Matthew K., Wilson Susan C., 2023. Arsenic and cadmium leaching in co-contaminated agronomic soil and the influence of high rainfall and amendments. Environ. Pollut. 316, 120591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harman JL, Jørgensen HF, 2019. The role of smooth muscle cells in plaque stability: therapeutic targeting potential. Br. J. Pharmacol. 176, 3741–3753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hu Y, Li J, Lou B, Wu R, Wang G, Lu C, Wang H, Pi J, Xu Y, 2020. The role of reactive oxygen species in arsenic toxicity. Biomolecules 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Insull W Jr., 2009. The pathology of atherosclerosis: plaque development and plaque responses to medical treatment. Am. J. Med. 122, S3–s14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karri Venkatanaidu, Kumar Vikas, Ramos David, Oliveira Eliandre, Schuhmacher Marta, 2018. An in vitro cytotoxic approach to assess the toxicity of heavy metals and their binary mixtures on hippocampal HT-22 cell line. Toxicol. Lett. 282, 25–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klutse Charles K., Mack Kelly, Squibb Katherine, Ishaque Ali B., 2009. Differential toxicological interaction among arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury on MCF 7 cell line. Schol. Res. Exchan. 2009, 789636. [Google Scholar]
  25. Koller Beverly H., Snouwaert John N., Douillet Christelle, Jania Leigh A., El-Masri Hisham, Thomas David J., Stýblo Miroslav, 2020. Arsenic metabolism in mice carrying a BORCS7/AS3MT locus humanized by Syntenic replacement. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 087003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kolluru GK, Tamilarasan KP, Geetha Priya S, Durgha NP, Chatterjee S, 2006. Cadmium induced endothelial dysfunction: consequence of defective migratory pattern of endothelial cells in association with poor nitric oxide availability under cadmium challenge. Cell Biol. Int. 30, 427–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kubier A, Wilkin RT, Pichler T, 2019. Cadmium in soils and groundwater: A review. Appl. Geochem. 108, 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumar Wasan Mani, Ribeiro Marta, Balla Andre, 2019. Cadmium-induced macrophage LDL and oxidized LDL internalization. FASEB J. 33, 802.74–02.74. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lamas GA, Bhatnagar A, Jones MR, Mann KK, Nasir K, Tellez-Plaza M, Ujueta F, Navas-Acien A, 2023. Contaminant metals as cardiovascular risk factors: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. J. Am. Heart Assoc. e029852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lemaire M, Lemarie CA, Molina MF, Schiffrin EL, Lehoux S, Mann KK, 2011. Exposure to moderate arsenic concentrations increases atherosclerosis in ApoE−/−mouse model. Toxicol. Sci. 122, 211–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu J, Liu Y, Habeebu SM, Waalkes MP, Klaassen CD, 2000. Chronic combined exposure to cadmium and arsenic exacerbates nephrotoxicity, particularly in metallothionein-I/II null mice. Toxicology 147, 157–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Makhani Kiran, Chiavatti Christopher, Plourde Dany, Silva Luis Fernando Negro, Lemaire Maryse, Lemarié Catherine A., Lehoux Stephanie, Mann Koren K., 2018. Using the apolipoprotein E Knock-out mouse model to define atherosclerotic plaque changes induced by low dose arsenic. Toxicol. Sci. 166, 213–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mirlean N, Baisch P, Diniz D, 2014. Arsenic in groundwater of the Paraiba do Sul delta, Brazil: an atmospheric source? Sci. Total Environ. 482–483, 148–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore Kathryn J., Tabas Ira, 2011. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell 145, 341–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Naujokas MF, Anderson B, Ahsan H, Aposhian HV, Graziano JH, Thompson C, Suk WA, 2013. The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 295–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nigra AE, Chen Q, Chillrud SN, Wang L, Harvey D, Mailloux B, Factor-Litvak P, Navas-Acien A, 2020. Inequalities in public water arsenic concentrations in counties and community water systems across the United States, 2006–2011. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 127001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nriagu JO, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee AB, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert RH, 2007. ’Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an overview. In: Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  38. Oliveira TF, Batista PR, Leal MA, Campagnaro BP, Nogueira BV, Vassallo DV, Meyrelles SS, Padilha Alessandra Simão, 2019. Chronic cadmium exposure accelerates the development of atherosclerosis and induces vascular dysfunction in the aorta of ApoE−/− mice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 187, 163–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oseghe Ekemena Oghenovoh, Idris Azeez Olayiwola, Feleni Usisipho, Mamba Bhekie Brilliance, Msagati Titus Alfred Makudali, 2021. A review on water treatment technologies for the management of oxoanions: prospects and challenges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 61979–61997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pereira Flavia E., Douglas Coffin J, Beall Howard D., 2007. Activation of protein kinase C and disruption of endothelial monolayer integrity by sodium arsenite—potential mechanism in the development of atherosclerosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 220, 164–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Prozialeck WC, Edwards JR, Nebert DW, Woods JM, Barchowsky A, Atchison WD, 2008. The vascular system as a target of metal toxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 102, 207–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Prozialeck Walter C., 2000. Evidence that E-cadherin may be a target for cadmium toxicity in epithelial cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 164, 231–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Prozialeck Walter C., Edwards Joshua R., Woods James M., 2006. The vascular endothelium as a target of cadmium toxicity. Life Sci. 79, 1493–1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Puddu Alessandra, Montecucco Fabrizio, Maggi Davide, 2023. Caveolin-1 and atherosclerosis: regulation of LDLs fate in endothelial cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 8869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rafati Rahimzadeh M, Rafati Rahimzadeh M, Kazemi S, Moghadamnia AA, 2017. Cadmium toxicity and treatment: an update. Caspian J. Intern. Med. 8, 135–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ravalli Filippo, Yuanzhi Yu, Bostick Benjamin C., Chillrud Steven N., Schilling Kathrin, Basu Anirban, Navas-Acien Ana, Nigra Anne E., 2022. Sociodemographic inequalities in uranium and other metals in community water systems across the USA, 2006–11: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Planet. Health 6 e320–e30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rodemann Helmut, LosECKE Wilhelm, Knödel Klaus, Müller Wolfgang, 1983. The MT-equipment of the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 35, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
  48. Santha Nipada, Sangkajan Saowani, Saenton Schradh, 2022. Arsenic contamination in groundwater and potential health risk in Western Lampang Basin, northern Thailand. Water 14, 465. [Google Scholar]
  49. Shukla Dericks Praise, Dubey CS, Singh Ningthoujam P., Tajbakhsh M, Chaudhry M, 2010. Sources and controls of arsenic contamination in groundwater of Rajnandgaon and Kanker District, Chattisgarh Central India. J. Hydrol. 395, 49–66. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sierra-Sánchez Ana Gabriela, Castillo-Suárez Luis Antonio, Martínez-Miranda Verónica, Linares-Hernández Ivonne, Teutli-Sequeira Elia Alejandra, 2022. As and $ ${\mathrm{F}}^{−}$ $cooccurrence in drinking water: critical review of the international scenario, physicochemical behavior, removal technologies, health effects, and future trends. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 38768–38796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. States JC, Srivastava S, Chen Y, Barchowsky A, 2009. Arsenic and cardiovascular disease. Toxicol. Sci. 107, 312–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sthiannopkao S, Kim KW, Sotham S, Choup S, 2008. Arsenic and manganese in tube well waters of Prey Veng and Kandal provinces, Cambodia. Appl. Geochem. 23, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tabas Ira, 2010. Macrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 36–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Taciak B, Białasek M, Braniewska A, Sas Z, Sawicka P, Kiraga Ł, Rygiel T, Król M, 2018. Evaluation of phenotypic and functional stability of RAW 264.7 cell line through serial passages. PLoS One 13, e0198943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tai YT, Chou SH, Cheng CY, Ho CT, Lin HC, Jung SM, Chu PH, Ko FH, 2022. The preferential accumulation of cadmium ions among various tissues in mice. Toxicol. Rep. 9, 111–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tinkov Alexey A., Filippini Tommaso, Ajsuvakova Olga P., Skalnaya Margarita G., Aaseth Jan, Bjørklund Geir, Gatiatulina Eugenia R., Popova Elizaveta V., Nemereshina Olga N., Huang Pai-Tsang, Vinceti Marco, Skalny Anatoly V., 2018. Cadmium and atherosclerosis: A review of toxicological mechanisms and a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Environ. Res. 162, 240–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tousoulis Dimitris, Oikonomou Evangelos, Economou Evangelos K., Crea Filippo, Kaski Juan Carlos, 2016. Inflammatory cytokines in atherosclerosis: current therapeutic approaches. Eur. Heart J. 37, 1723–1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vahter M, 1999. Methylation of inorganic arsenic in different mammalian species and population groups. Sci. Prog. 82 (Pt 1), 69–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vestweber D, 2008. VE-cadherin: the major endothelial adhesion molecule controlling cellular junctions and blood vessel formation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28, 223–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD, 2006. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47, C13–C18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang Shur-Jen, Greer Peter, Auerbach Robert, 1996. Isolation and propagation of yolk-sac-derived endothelial cells from a hypervascular transgenic mouse expressing a gain-of-functionFPS/FES proto-oncogene. In Vitro Cell. Develop. Biol. - Anim. 32, 292–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. World Health, Organization, 2004. Cadmium in Drinking-water: Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. World Health Organization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  63. World Health Organization, 2019. Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments: Exposure to Arsenic: A Major Public Health Concern. World Health Organization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu H, Jiang J, Chen W, Li W, Chen Z, 2019. Vascular macrophages in atherosclerosis. J Immunol Res 2019, 4354786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yáñez Leticia, Carrizales Leticia, Zanatta María Teresa, de Jesús José, Mejía Lilia Batres, Díaz-Barriga Fernando, 1991. Arsenic-cadmium interaction in rats: toxic effects in the heart and tissue metal shifts. Toxicology 67, 227–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhou Juanjuan, Liu Yanwei, Li Bingqian, Li Huashou, Chen Guikui, Qiu Rongliang, 2023. Coagulation of trace arsenic and cadmium from drinking water using titanium potassium oxalate. npj Clean Water 6, 9. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

RESOURCES