Skip to main content
Journal of Cancer logoLink to Journal of Cancer
. 2024 Sep 3;15(17):5577–5593. doi: 10.7150/jca.97277

Downregulation of Brf1 Induces Liver Failure and Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Promoting Apoptosis

Yaping Xu 1,*, Chundong Yu 3,*, Hongbin Zhang 4, Tao Wang 5, Yujian Liu 2, Lupeng Wu 2, Shuping Zhong 6,✉, Zaifa Hong 2,✉
PMCID: PMC11414613  PMID: 39308682

Abstract

The occurrence and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are closely related to abnormal apoptosis. Brf1 is highly expressed in HCC and has clinical prognostic value. Here, attenuation of Brf1-induced apoptosis was found, and the related mechanism was explored. In the study, general bioinformatics data for Brf1 were obtained from The Human Protein Atlas (HPA). Analyses of the clinical prognostic value of Brf1 in HCC were performed with the Xiantao Academic web server using R software. The basic data were obtained from the GTEx database and TCGA database. Brf1 conditional knockout mice were obtained by repeated mating of C57BL/6 Brf1LoxP/LoxP and C57BL/6 NS5A-alb-Cre-ERT2 mice and verified by genotyping. Liver function measurements, hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed to explore the cause of mouse death after Brf1 knockout. The Brf1 knockdown HCC cell model was generated using lentiviral vector-based shRNA transduction. Cell proliferation assays, plate colony formation assays, anchorage-independent colony formation assays and mouse subcutaneous tumor models were used to evaluate the progression of HCC. Western blot (WB) analysis, flow cytometry, and TUNEL assays were used to detect apoptosis. DNA sequencing, transcriptomics, and proteomics analyses were carried out to explore the antiapoptotic mechanism of Brf1. We found that Brf1 was highly expressed in HCC and had clinical prognostic value. Brf1 knockout led to liver failure and hepatocyte apoptosis in mice. Downregulation of Brf1 slowed HCC cell proliferation, colony growth, and mouse subcutaneous tumor growth and increased the sensitivity of HCC cells to apoptosis induced by chemotherapy drugs. The expression of Brf1 was positively related to that of the apoptosis gene Bcl-2. The sequencing, transcriptomics and proteomics analyses consistently showed that energy metabolism played an important role in Brf1 function, that protein-protein interaction was the primary mode, and that organelles such as mitochondria were the main sites. In Conclusions, downregulation of Brf1 inhibits HCC development by inducing apoptosis. Energy metabolism plays an important role in Brf1 function. These results provide a scientific basis for combating HCC.

Keywords: Brf1, hepatocellular carcinoma, metabolism, Bcl-2, apoptosis

1. Introduction

The incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are both high worldwide 1, 2. Primary liver cancer was the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide in 2020 3. Although great progress has been made in the experimental research and clinical treatment of HCC in recent years, the molecular mechanism of HCC development is still unclear.

Apoptosis is a biological phenomenon. Abnormal apoptosis can cause cancer. Many genes are involved in the regulation of apoptosis, including oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Among these genes, ICE, Apaf-1, Bcl-2, Fas/APO-1, c-myc, p53, ATM, c-jun, etc., are closely related to HCC 4-6. Bcl-2 prevents the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria and inhibits apoptosis. Many studies have shown that Bcl-2 is closely related to the development of HCC7. The TFIIIB complex, which includes the Brf1 transcription factor along with the TATA-binding protein and B double prime subunit, operates in concert to facilitate gene transcription. Specifically, Brf1 is indispensable for the process of guiding RNA polymerase III (Pol III) to the appropriate target genes. Moreover, BRF1's activity is a critical factor that can limit the rate of transcription carried out by Pol III8. It was reported that elevated Brf1 levels are linked to worse outcomes in liver, breast, and stomach cancers9-11. However, there is no study on the relationship between Brf1 and apoptosis or between Brf1 and Bcl-2 in the development of HCC.

On the basis of the high expression of Brf1 in HCC and its clinical prognostic value, mice with conditional hepatic knockout of Brf1 were used to explore the role of Brf1 in the occurrence and development of HCC. Robust apoptosis was observed in the liver, and the mice gradually developed liver failure. Similarly, downregulation of Brf1 inhibited HCC proliferation, colony growth and subcutaneous tumor growth in mice. Brf1 had a positive regulatory effect on Bcl-2 expression. To explore the antiapoptotic mechanism of Brf1, gene sequencing, transcriptomics, and proteomics analyses were performed. The results suggested that Brf1, in terms of biological processes (BPs), influenced mitochondrial energy metabolism and hindered apoptosis. In terms of molecular functions (MFs), protein-protein interaction was an important mechanism. In terms of cell components (CCs), the cell membrane and organelles were the main sites.

In summary, Brf1/bcl-2 signaling axis induces apoptosis and promotes the development of HCC. Energy metabolism plays an important role in this signaling axis. This study may provide experimental evidence for improving the treatment of HCC.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 General bioinformatics analysis of Brf1

Data for Brf1 expression in normal tissues (protein/RNA distribution, subcellular localization, etc.) and Brf1 expression in cancer tissues (Brf1 protein expression in cancer tissues/cells, boxplots of Brf1 RNA expression in patients) were obtained from The Human Protein Atlas (HPA, https://www.proteinatlas.org).

2.2 Differential expression of Brf1 and clinical prognostic value of Brf1 in HCC

Clinical analyses, including the relationships between Brf1 and Fas, c-myc, and Bcl2, were performed with data from the Xiantao Academic web server (https://www.xiantao.love) using R software (version 3.6.3). Data for 50 normal liver samples were obtained from the GTEx database (https://www.gtexportal.org/). Data from 424 HCC patient samples, namely, 50 paracancerous tissues and 374 tumor tissues, were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://cancergenome.nih.gov/). All expression data were normalized by log2 conversion.

2.3 Mouse genotyping

C57BL/6 Brf1LoxP/LoxP (BEIJING BIOCOTYGENE CO., Beijing, China) and C57BL/6 NS5A-alb-Cre-ERT2 (Experimental Animal Center of the Liver Disease Center in University of Southern California, California, USA) mice were repeatedly mated to obtain male C57BL/6 NS5A-alb-Cre-ERT2-Brf1LoxP/LoxP mice. The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of South California (California, USA). DNA was extracted from mouse tails using the phenol/chloroform extraction method. Genotyping was carried out using a TAKARA PCR kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions with an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc, Shanghai, China). The primer sequences were as follows: Brf1-LoxP Forward 5'- GGA TGT CCC ATC CCT GCT GAT G -3'. Reverse 5'- CTG CCA AAA GTG GCT GGG ACT TA -3'. Cre Forward 5, -ATG CTT CTG TCC GTT TGC CG-3'. Reverse 5' -CCT GTT TTG CAC GTT CAC CG--3'. GAPDH Forward 5' -TCC ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG-3'. Reverse 5' -ACC ACA GTC CAT GCC ATC-3'. NS5A Forward 5'- GGA CGA TGA GGA TCG TCG G -3'. Reverse 5' -TGG CTA GCC GAG GAG CTG G -3'.

2.4 Mouse liver function measurements

Mouse peripheral blood was extracted after euthanasia. The serum was separated, and total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT), and aspartate transaminase (AST) were quantified using a liver function test kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bio, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions with a spectrophotometer.

2.5 Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

HE: Paraffin tissue blocks were cut sliced into 4 μm sections, deparaffined with xylene and rehydrated. The paraffin sections were stained sequentially with hematoxylin and eosin. IHC: Paraffin sections were submerged in 0.01 M citrate antigen retrieval buffer (pH 6.0) and microwaved for antigen retrieval. They were treated with 0.3% H2O2 for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidase at the designated times and were then treated with normal goat serum for 30 min to reduce nonspecific binding. Then, the sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-Brf1 antibody (1:200) (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., West FM, Montgomery, TX, USA) overnight at 4 °C. Then, the tissue sections were sequentially incubated with ready-to-use HRP-immunoglobulin (EvisionTM) for 30 min, and color was developed with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as a chromogenic substrate. Then, the sections were costained with hematoxylin to visualize nuclei.

2.6 Cell culture and transfection. The human liver cancer cell lines HepG2 and Huh7 were obtained from ATCC and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin in carbon dioxide incubator (Labtrip HWJ-3-160, Shanghai, China) that kept 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. The cell line HepG2 was authenticated using Short Tandem Repeat (STR) analysis. The cell growth media were obtained from Life Technologies Inc. Endogenous Brf1 expression in HepG2 and Huh7 cells was downregulated using lentiviral vector-based shRNA transduction. The human Brf1 shRNA target sequences were 5′-cgGCATCTACAAGGAACACAA-3′ (shBrf1-103188), 5′-gcTTGAACAAGTCCTGTCAAA-3′ (shBrf1-103189) and 5′-GGTTGCAGCCAGAATGCATGA-3′ (shBrf1-103190). The shRNA control (sh-Ctrl) sequence was 5′- TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT -3′. The lentiviruses expressing the Brf1 shRNA plasmid and control shRNA plasmid were obtained from GeneChem (GeneChem Co., Ltd., Shanghai). Freshly plated HepG2 and HuH7 cells were infected with the lentiviruses and screened for stable transduction with puromycin according to the instructions.

2.7 Western blot analysis

Cell lysates were collected using the Total Protein Extraction Kit (Keygen, Jiangsu, China). Supernatants were recovered by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were measured, and equal amounts of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE (Catalog #: PH0333. Network Technology Co., Ltd. Jiangsu, China). Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, New York, USA), and the membranes were blocked for 1 hour in TBST. Then, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. The rabbit anti-Brf1 antibody (Catalog #: A301-228A) obtained from Bethyl Laboratories. The mouse monoclonal antibody against actin (catalog #: sc-58673) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-rabbit IgG-HRP and anti-mouse IgG-HRP were obtained from Cell Signaling. Chemiluminescence reagents were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. Specific bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, Massachusetts, USA) on autoradiographic film. The film was attached to the membrane for exposure to display the protein band after the film is interacting with the ECL luminescent solution. The ChemiDoc EQ system with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad) was used to determine the densities of the protein bands.

2.8 Cell proliferation assay

HepG2 cells were seeded in six-well plates in triplicate. The cells were treated with PBS as a control and oxaliplatin as indicated in the figures. The confluence of the cells on the 6th day was approximately 85%-90%. Cell morphology was analyzed by microscopy using a Nikon Eclipse TE300 and MetaMorph software (Cell and Tissue Imaging Core of University of Southern California Research Center for Liver Diseases, P30 DK048522). Cells were assayed for viability through Trypan blue staining and observation of cell morphology, detached with trypsin and then counted with a globulimeter.

2.9 Plate colony formation assay

For the colony formation assay, stably transduced cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 500 cells/well and incubated in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 14 days. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma‒Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and allowed to dry. Colonies larger than 100 μm in diameter were counted.

2.10 Anchorage-independent colony growth

Stably transduced cells (1 x 104 cells/well in a 6-well plate) were suspended in 0.35% (w/v) agar in 10% FBS/DMEM/F12 over a bottom layer of medium with 0.5% (w/v) agar. Cells were fed fresh complete medium twice weekly. Colonies were counted 2 or more weeks after plating as previously described12.

2.11 Subcutaneous tumor model in mice

The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Xiamen University (Xiamen, China, Animal Ethics Approval No. XMULAC20210090), and the mice were housed under specific pathogen‑free conditions (an environment free of specific disease‑causing microbes and parasites, including hepatitis A and E viruses; certain nonpathogenic microbes and parasites, including yeasts, were allowed to exist). All efforts were made to minimize suffering. Twenty mice were evenly divided into two groups. Xenograft tumors were established in the hind legs of 4- to 5-week-old nude mice (BALB/c, nu/nu: Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) by subcutaneous injection of 2x106 cells. After a total of 14-21 days, the subcutaneous tumors were removed and cut into 1-mm3 sections. The tissue sections were implanted subcutaneously in nude mice (BALB/c, SPF grade, 4-5 weeks of age). The mice were administered oxaliplatin (20 mg/kg/week) by intraperitoneal injection on the 4th, 11th, and 18th days after transplantation. The mice were sacrificed on the 21st day after transplantation. The tumor volumes were determined according to the following formula: A×B2 /2, where A is the largest diameter and B is the perpendicular diameter.

2.12 Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, CA, USA) was used to examine apoptosis with an Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (Qcbio Science & Technologies Co. Ltd., Shanghai China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.13 TUNEL assay

Cell and tissue apoptosis were detected using a YFR488 TUNEL Assay Apoptosis Detection Kit (US EVERBRIGHT INC., Suzhou, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.14 DNA sequencing

Brf1-binding DNA was obtained with a Hyperactive Universal CUT&Tag Assay Kit for Illumina (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. The rabbit anti-human Brf1 antibody was obtained from Bethyl Laboratories, and goat anti-rabbit IgG was obtained from Vazyme (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). CUT&Tag is a new method used to study protein-DNA interactions. Hyperactive pG-Tn5/pA-Tn5 Transposase, a new type of fusion enzyme with extremely high activity, precisely targets a DNA sequence near the gene encoding the target protein under the guidance of an antibody. Novogene Co., Ltd., was entrusted to complete the gene sequencing (Item No: X101SC22080089-Z01-J001-B1-7). The methods used are described in the supplemental material.

2.15 Transcriptomics and proteomics analyses

Applied Protein Technology Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), was entrusted to complete the transcriptomics and proteomics analyses (Transcriptomics Item No: P20211205614 and Proteomics Item No: P20211205612). The methods used are described in the supplemental material.

2.16 Statistical analysis

SPSS 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was used for statistical analysis. All quantitative results are expressed as the means ± SDs. Statistically significant differences were identified using Student's t test or one-way ANOVA. The presented values are from three independent experiments. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. For the bioinformatics analysis, statistical data acquired from TCGA were merged and analyzed by R software (version 3.6.3).

3. Results

3.1 Brf1 was highly expressed in HCC and had clinical prognostic value

The Pol III gene plays an important role in regulating normal physiological development and maintaining the stability of the internal environment. A specific transcription factor for the pol III gene, Brf1 was found to be highly expressed in the nervous system, endocrine system, and urinary system but expressed at low levels in the liver (Fig. 1A). Brf1 expression had low specificity, including tissue specificity, cell type specificity, organ specificity, and cancer specificity. In human HCC tissue, Brf1 was mainly expressed in the nucleus13 (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Elevated Brf1 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Correlates with Poor Prognosis. (A) Tissue Distribution of Brf1. Brf1 is broadly expressed across various tissues but exhibits low levels in the liver. (B) Brf1 Expression in Cancer. High Brf1 expression is observed in a range of human tumor types according to the Human Protein Atlas (HPA). (C-D) Comparative Brf1 Expression in HCC. Statistically significant higher Brf1 levels in HCC tissues compared to normal liver tissues are demonstrated through paired (t-test, ***p < 0.0001) and unpaired (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ***p < 0.0001) comparisons. (E) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of 0.908 with a confidence interval (CI) of 0.870-0.946 suggests that Brf1 is a highly specific and sensitive biomarker for HCC prognosis. (F)Variability of Brf1 Expression in HCC Tissues. Heterogeneous Brf1 expression patterns are evident in HCC tissues as depicted by the HPA.(G) Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Survival Curve. The log-rank test reveals a statistically significant difference in survival times between groups (*p = 0.029 < 0.05). Additionally, Cox regression analysis confirms a significant association between Brf1 expression and survival outcomes [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.55, 95% CI (1.09-2.19), *P = 0.014 < 0.05].

Table 1.

Summary of Brf1.

Protein BRF1, RNA polymerase Ill transcription initiation factor subunit
Gene name BRF1 (BRF, GTF3B, hBRF, TAF3B2, TAF3C, TFIIIB90)
Tissue specificity Low tissue specificity
Single cell type specificity! Low cell type specificity
Blood specificity Low immune cell specificity
Brain specificity! Low human brain regional specificity
cancer prognostic summary Prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer (favorable) and renal cancer (favorable).
Predicted location Intracellular
Subcellular summary Located in Nucleoplasm, Nuclear bodies (Single cell variability, CCD Protein)
Protein function (UniProt) General activator of RNA polymerase which utilizes different TFIIIB complexes at structurally distinct promoters., The isoform 1 is involved in the transcription of tRNA, adenovirus VA1, 7SL and 5S RNA. Isoform 2 is required for transcription of the U6 promoter.
Molecular function (UniProt) Activator
Biological process (UniProt) Transcription, Transcription regulation
Disease involvement Disease mutation, Dwarfism. Mental retardation
Ligand (UniProt) Metal-binding, Zinc
Gene summary (Entrez) This gene encodes one of the three subunits of the RNA polymerase Ill transcription factor complex. This complex plays a central role in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase Ill on genes encoding tRNA, 5S rRNA and other small structural RNAs. The gene product belongs to the TF2B family. Several alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms, that function at different promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase Ill, have been identified.

Brf1 was highly expressed in tissues of various human tumors (Fig. 1B). Its expression in tumor tissue was significantly higher than that in normal tissue (Fig. S1A). In HCC patients, in both unpaired comparisons groups (Fig. 1C) and paired comparisons (Fig. 1D), Brf1 expression in HCC tissue was significantly higher than that in normal liver tissue. ROC analysis showed that Brf1 had high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HCC (Fig. 1E). Brf1 expression varied among HCC tissues (Fig. 1F). Patients were divided into a high expression group and a low expression group based on the median Brf1 mRNA expression level (Table 2). The prognosis in the high Brf1 expression group was worse than that in the low Brf1 expression group. (Fig. 1G). Brf1 expression had clinical prognostic value for T stage (Fig. S1B), pathologic stage (Fig. S1C), AFP level (Fig. S1D, Table 2b), OS (Fig. S1E), Ishak fibrosis score (Table 2) and histologic grade (Fig. S1F) but not for N stage, M stage, pathologic grade, sex, race, age, weight, height, BMI, residual tumor status, adjacent hepatic tissue inflammation status, albumin level, prothrombin time, Child-Pugh score, Ishak fibrosis score, vascular invasion status, DSS, or PFI (Table 2). Due to differences in the data distribution and homogeneity of variance, some statistical data were corrected. For example, as the data exhibited a nonnormal distribution and inhomogeneity of variance, Welch's one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (for multiple hypothesis testing) were used to determine statistical significance for histologic grade (Tables 3, 4). These results indicated that HCC patients with high Brf1 expression had worse prognoses.

Table 2.

a. Clinical Baseline Data 1; b. Clinical Baseline Data 2.

a. Clinical Baseline Data 1.
Characteristics Low expression of BRF1 High expression of BRF1 P value Method
n 187 187
# Pathologic T stage, n (%) 0.141162207 Chisq test
T1 100 (27%) 83 (22.4%)
T2 47 (12.7%) 48 (12.9%)
T3 32 (8.6%) 48 (12.9%)
T4 5 (1.3%) 8 (2.2%)
Pathologic N stage, n (%) 1 Yates' correction
N0 128 (49.6%) 126 (48.8%)
N1 2 (0.8%) 2 (0.8%)
Pathologic M stage, n (%) 0.614459893 Yates' correction
M0 133 (48.9%) 135 (49.6%)
M1 3 (1.1%) 1 (0.4%)
# Pathologic stage, n (%) 0.050099469 Yates' correction
Stage I 94 (26.9%) 79 (22.6%)
Stage II 47 (13.4%) 40 (11.4%)
Stage III 33 (9.4%) 52 (14.9%)
Stage IV 4 (1.1%) 1 (0.3%)
Tumor status, n (%) 0.518936422 Chisq test
Tumor free 106 (29.9%) 96 (27%)
With tumor 75 (21.1%) 78 (22%)
Gender, n (%) 0.740197323 Chisq test
Female 59 (15.8%) 62 (16.6%)
Male 128 (34.2%) 125 (33.4%)
Age, n (%) 0.718639414 Chisq test
<= 60 87 (23.3%) 90 (24.1%)
> 60 100 (26.8%) 96 (25.7%)
Histological type, n (%) 0.206609844 Yates' correction
Fibrolamellar carcinoma 3 (0.8%) 0 (0%)
Hepatocellular carcinoma 181 (48.4%) 183 (48.9%)
Hepatocholangiocarcinoma 3 (0.8%) 4 (1.1%)
b. Clinical Baseline Data 2.
Characteristics Low expression of BRF1 High expression of BRF1 P value Method
# Histologic grade, n (%) 0.032990246 Chisq test
G1 33 (8.9%) 22 (6%)
G2 94 (25.5%) 84 (22.8%)
G3 50 (13.6%) 74 (20.1%)
G4 8 (2.2%) 4 (1.1%)
# AFP (ng/ml), n (%) 0.012290126 Chisq test
<= 400 124 (44.3%) 91 (32.5%)
> 400 26 (9.3%) 39 (13.9%)
# Fibrosis Ishak score, n (%) 0.017729192 Yates' correction
0 46 (21.4%) 29 (13.5%)
1/2 16 (7.4%) 15 (7%)
3/4 8 (3.7%) 20 (9.3%)
5 4 (1.9%) 5 (2.3%)
6 46 (21.4%) 26 (12.1%)
Vascular invasion, n (%) 0.513554307 Chisq test
No 112 (35.2%) 96 (30.2%)
Yes 55 (17.3%) 55 (17.3%)
Adjacent hepatic tissue inflammation, n (%) 0.525787246 Chisq test
None 66 (27.8%) 52 (21.9%)
Mild 53 (22.4%) 48 (20.3%)
Severe 12 (5.1%) 6 (2.5%)
# OS event, n (%) 0.082324087 Chisq test
Alive 130 (34.8%) 114 (30.5%)
Dead 57 (15.2%) 73 (19.5%)
DSS event, n (%) 0.490115515 Chisq test
No 147 (40.2%) 140 (38.3%)
Yes 37 (10.1%) 42 (11.5%)
PFI event, n (%) 0.756314874 Chisq test
No 97 (25.9%) 94 (25.1%)
Yes 90 (24.1%) 93 (24.9%)

# Brf1 had clinical prognostic significance.

Table 3.

Histologic grade relevance- Welch One-way Anova Test.

Group (DFn) (DFd) statistics p value
Intragroup comparison 3 47.139 3.0239 0.0387

3.2 Brf1 knockout led to liver failure and hepatocyte apoptosis in mice

Brf1 overexpression is important in the occurrence and development of HCC. A strategy for conditional (temporal dimension) knockout of Brf1 in the mouse liver (spatial dimension) with the NS5A gene was designed to study the role of Brf1 in HCC occurrence (Fig. S1G). The appetite and weight of the mice decreased gradually after Brf1 knockout (Fig. 2A). On the 7th day, the mice were unable to drink. Their sclerae were clearly yellow, and the mice ultimately died (Fig. S1H). Liver function was tested to determine the cause of death. The synthesis of total protein (TP) and the albumin (ALB) level were decreased, the total bilirubin (TB) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were increased, and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were significantly increased (Fig. 2B). The liver function time curve was plotted, and it showed that liver function gradually decreased (Fig. S1I). It did not change suddenly at a particular time point. We speculated that Brf1 gene expression was completely knocked out in mice 24 hours after intraperitoneal injection of tamoxifen. However, the Brf1 mRNA and Brf1 protein that were produced prior to injection could still function until they were completely degraded in vivo.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Brf1 Deletion Results in Hepatic Dysfunction and Apoptosis in a Mouse Model. (A) Mouse Weight Changes. Following tamoxifen injection, a progressive decrease in mouse weight was observed over the 7-day period, with statistical significance noted (t test, **p < 0.01). (B) Liver Function Markers. In Brf1 conditional knockout mice, levels of total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) were reduced, while those of total bilirubin (TB) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were elevated. Additionally, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) showed significant increases, indicative of liver injury (t test, **p < 0.01). (C) Gross Pathological Observations. Brf1 conditional knockout mice exhibited edema in digestive organs, with livers appearing swollen and pale. A notable accumulation of ascites was observed in the abdominal cavity. (D) Liver Morphology. Livers from Brf1 knockout mice were characterized by pallor and enlargement. (E) Verification of Brf1 Knockout. Brf1 expression was absent in the livers of knockout mice, contrasting with the weak expression observed in control groups. (F) Hepatocyte Pathology. The hepatic lobule structure in Brf1 knockout mice was severely disrupted, with disorganized hepatic plates and hepatocytes showing signs of swelling and apoptosis, evidenced by the presence of numerous apoptotic bodies.

To understand how Brf1 affects liver function, the livers were removed and observed under a microscope after euthanasia. A large volume of ascites (about 5% of body weight) was found in the abdominal cavity in Brf1 conditional knockout mice, and the livers became pale and swollen (Fig. 2C, Fig. 2D). Brf1 was not expressed in mouse livers with Brf1 knockout and was weakly expressed in both control groups (Fig. 2E). Pathological analysis showed that the hepatic lobe structure was disorganized and that the structural integrity was destroyed. The arrangement of the hepatic plates was irregular.

The hepatocytes exhibited an increased volume of cytoplasm and were swollen, with a large number of apoptotic bodies (Fig. 2F). The pathology time curve was plotted based on the liver function time curve. There was no specific time point at which liver histology suddenly changed in Brf1 conditional knockout mice. With knockout of Brf1, hepatocytes gradually underwent apoptosis and lysis (Fig. S1J). In conclusion, Brf1 plays an important role in maintaining normal hepatocyte homeostasis and liver function 14. Brf1 knockout induces apoptosis in hepatocytes.

3.3 Downregulation of Brf1 slowed HCC progression and increased the sensitivity of HCC cells to apoptosis induced by chemotherapy drugs

A cell model of Brf1 knockdown was established to explore its role in HCC (Fig. 3A). HepG2 cell proliferation (Fig. 3B), plate colony formation (Fig. 3C) and agarose colony formation (Fig. S2A) were slowed in the Brf1 knockdown group. To verify the repeatability of these results in an animal experiment, HepG2 and Huh7 subcutaneous tumors were generated in mice. Tumor growth was also slower in the Brf1 knockdown group (Fig. 3D, Fig. S2B). Dose curves and time curves were generated to better understand the effect of oxaliplatin on HCC cells (Fig. S2C, S2D). Downregulation of Brf1 increased the sensitivity of HCC cells to apoptosis induced by oxaliplatin (Fig. 3E). Cas 3 and Cas 9 are important markers of apoptosis. Their expression levels in the Brf1 knockdown group were higher than those in the control group (Fig. 3F). The TUNEL assay results were consistent with the flow cytometry results (Fig. 3G). In the animal experiment, the mice were also treated with oxaliplatin. Apoptosis was more robust in tumor tissue from the Brf1 knockdown group (Fig. S2E). The decrease in Brf1 expression and the increase in apoptosis slowed the development of HCC.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Brf1 Suppression Attenuates Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Progression and Enhances Chemotherapy-Induced Apoptosis. (A) Brf1 Knockdown Efficiency. Brf1 expression was significantly reduced by over 75% in sh1, sh2, and sh3 cells, as confirmed by the chi square test (***p < 0.001). (B-C) HepG2 Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation. Both the rate of proliferation and the ability to form colonies were markedly diminished in the Brf1 knockdown group, as determined by the t test (***p < 0.001). (D) Subcutaneous Tumor Growth in HepG2 Cells. Tumors developed more slowly in mice with Brf1 knockdown, indicating a retardation in tumor growth kinetics (t test, ***p < 0.001). (E) Apoptosis Assessment by Flow Cytometry. HepG2 cells were exposed to 400 µg/ml oxaliplatin for 24 hours to induce apoptosis. The Brf1 knockdown group exhibited a significantly higher rate of apoptosis compared to the control group (t test, ***p < 0.01). (F) Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 Expression. Expression levels of both caspase 3 and caspase 9 were elevated in the Brf1 knockdown group, suggesting enhanced apoptotic signaling (chi square test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01). (G) TUNEL Assay for Apoptosis Detection. The sensitivity to oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis was increased in the Brf1 knockdown group, as evidenced by a higher number of TUNEL-positive cells.

3.4 Brf1 expression was positively related to Bcl-2 expression

The regulation of apoptosis involves many genes, including oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Among these genes, ICE, Apaf-1, Bcl-2, Fas/Apo-1, c-myc, p53, ATM, and c-jun are closely related to HCC. The above genes were investigated individually. The basic clinical data for Brf1 and ICE, Apaf-1, Bcl-2, Fas/Apo-1, c-myc, p53, and c-jun from TCGA were analyzed on the Xiantao Academic website. Brf1 expression was positively correlated with Bcl-2 expression (Fig. 4A, Table 5). The WB results further confirmed that the expression of only Bcl-2 was positively correlated with that of Brf1 (Fig. 4B). Bcl-2, a membrane integrin, inhibits the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria during apoptosis. An increasing number of studies have indicated that Bcl-2 is closely related to the development of HCC. Pyrimidine inhibits the apoptosis of HCC cells by upregulating Bcl-2. miR-365 induces HCC cell apoptosis by targeting Bcl-2 5, 15. Our results suggest that in the microenvironment of liver cancer, an increase in Brf1 may promote the expression of Bcl-2, thereby promoting the proliferation of liver cancer cells and inhibiting their apoptosis. (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Positive Correlation Between Brf1 and Bcl-2 Expression and Its Implication in Apoptosis Inhibition and HCC Progression. (A) Single Gene Coexpression Heatmap. Bioinformatics analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between Brf1 and Bcl-2 expression, with no correlation observed for c-myc or Fas, suggesting a specific interaction between Brf1 and Bcl-2 in the context of apoptosis (not shown). (B) Schematic Illustration of Brf1's Role in Apoptosis and HCC Progression. The proposed model illustrates how Brf1 may upregulate Bcl-2 expression, thereby inhibiting apoptosis, promoting hepatocyte transformation, and accelerating HCC cell proliferation, ultimately leading to HCC progression. (C) Western Blot (WB) Validation of Apoptosis-Related Genes. WB analysis confirmed a positive relationship between Brf1 and Bcl-2 expression (***P < 0.001), while no significant association was found with ICE, Apaf-1, Fas/Apo-1, c-myc, p53, or c-jun.

Table 5.

Molecular correlation table.

Target mol. Comparative mol. Related coefficient (Pearson) P value (Pearson) Related coefficient (Spearman) P value (Spearman)
BRF1 bcl2 0.181 < 0.001 0.139 0.007**
BRF1 myc 0.049 0.344 0.066 0.2
BRF1 fas -0.104 0.045* -0.092 0.075

3.5 Energy metabolism played an important role in Brf1 function

The antiapoptotic mechanism of Brf1 was explored by bioinformatics approaches. Energy metabolism plays an important role in Brf1 function. Protein-protein interaction was the primary mode. Intracellular organelles, such as mitochondria, were the main sites.

The Brf1 binding sequence was obtained by CUT&Tag. Brf1 is a transcription factor that binds to a promoter sequence near the transcription start site (TSS) to enhance gene transcription. The signal surrounding the TSS was significantly enhanced. Brf1 bound to a site approximately 300 bp upstream of the TSS (Fig. S3A). The lengths of the Brf1 binding sites were approximately 75 bp and 125 bp (Fig. S3B). Both the number of Brf1 binding sites and the fraction of reads in peaks (FRiP) were high, indicating that Brf1 bound to a wide range of sites and affected many downstream genes (peak number: 4000; FRiP: 3.4283%). The distribution map of the peaks in gene functional regions confirmed that Brf1 was also a promoter of transcription (Fig. S3C). Based on the GO annotations, Brf1 affects energy metabolism and participates in protein-protein interactions in intracellular organelles such as mitochondria (Fig. 5A, Table 6). Based on the KEGG annotations, Brf1 also affects cellular energy metabolism (Fig. 5B, Table 7). Brf1 may promote energy metabolism and enhance ribosome function, which results in accelerated cell cycle progression and decreased apoptosis, ultimately leading to the occurrence and development of tumors.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Brf1's Integral Role in Energy Metabolism and Its Association with Metabolic Pathways. (A) Sequencing-GO Enrichment Analysis Plot. Within the Biological Process (BP) category, Brf1 is linked to metabolic processes, particularly those involving cellular macromolecules. In the Cellular Component (CC) category, Brf1 shows an association with membranous organelles, including mitochondria. In the Molecular Function (MF) category, Brf1 is related to binding functions, such as heterocyclic compound binding. (B) Sequencing-KEGG Enrichment Scatter Plot. Brf1 demonstrates a significant connection to metabolic pathways, indicating its potential regulatory role in these processes. (C) Transcriptomic-GO Enrichment Histogram. In the lower panel, Brf1 is associated with terms related to energy metabolism, with a notable emphasis on mitochondrial respiration. (D) Transcriptomic-KEGG Enrichment Bubble Plot. In the lower panel, Brf1 is implicated in two major pathway categories: energy metabolism and chronic diseases. (E) Proteomic-GO Annotation Statistical Diagram of DEGs. Within the BP category, enrichment in the regulation of metabolism and blood coagulation indicates Brf1's significance in liver function. In the CC category, Brf1 is closely associated with the cell and mitochondrial membranes. In the MF category, enrichment in receptor regulator activity terms suggests that Brf1 may function through protein-protein interactions. (F) Proteomic-KEGG Pathway Annotation Statistical Diagram (Top 20). Brf1 is related to several metabolic pathways, including steroid hormone biosynthesis, nucleotide metabolism, and cell death/apoptosis pathways such as cell cycle, necroptosis, and metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450.

Table 6.

Sequencing-GO enrichment list.

GO Description Term type Overrepresented p value Corrected p value Gene item Gene list Bg item Bg list
GO:0044237 cellular metabolic process Biological process 2.40E-08 5.76E-05 1034 2.36E+03 1.10E+04 28465
GO:0044424 intracellular part Cellular component 8.20E-08 0.00013107 718 2.36E+03 7.92E+03 28465
GO:0097159 organic cyclic compound binding Molecular function 1.58E-07 0.0001516 833 2.36E+03 8.17E+03 28465
GO:1901363 heterocyclic compound binding Molecular function 1.58E-07 0.0001516 833 2.36E+03 8.17E+03 28465

Table 7.

Sequencing-KEGG enrichment list.

Term Database ID Input number Background number P value Corrected p value
Ribosome KEGG PATHWAY hsa03010 57 138 4.42E-21 6.41E-19
Pathways in cancer KEGG PATHWAY hsa05200 87 397 3.53E-16 3.41E-14
Epstein-Barr virus infection KEGG PATHWAY hsa05169 54 204 2.80E-13 2.03E-11
Cell cycle KEGG PATHWAY hsa04110 39 124 7.40E-12 4.29E-10

The general GO functional enrichment analysis results of the transcriptome data showed that in the BP category, Brf1 was mainly related to terms associated with nucleic acid metabolism and energy metabolism, especially mitochondrial respiration. In the MF and CC categories, Brf1 was determined to play a role through protein-protein interactions in various intracellular organelles, such as mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. S3D). The GO enrichment histogram details the general GO enrichment patterns (lower panel) (Fig. 5C). Most of the downregulated genes were related to energy metabolism, especially mitochondrial respiration. They were also related to nucleic acid metabolism. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that Brf1 was mainly related to two kinds of pathways (Fig. 5D, Fig. S3E). One was energy metabolism pathways, such as oxidative photosynthesis. The other was the occurrence and development of chronic diseases, such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Proteomics analysis showed that Brf1 expression resulted in downregulation of 59 proteins and upregulation of 76 proteins (Table 8). Eight of the downregulated proteins and 10 of the upregulated proteins had good repeatability (Table 9). Based on the above information, Brf1 may exert antiapoptotic effects in the following ways. (1) Interference with the DNA repair ability in the nucleus and mitochondria. (2) Increasing the energy generated by glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration. (3) Enhancing the function of RNA polymerase III. Because these were the consistent differences across all samples, they were of great importance. GO functional enrichment analysis showed that in the BP category, Brf1 was mainly involved in the regulation of hormones related to energy metabolism, such as thyroid hormone and growth hormone (Fig. S3F). The domain enrichment analysis diagram indicates that Brf1 has a great impact on cellular energy metabolism and blood coagulation function (Fig. S3G). In the CC category, Brf1 was closely related to the cell membrane and organelle membrane and participated in the extrinsic apoptosis pathway or mitochondrial apoptosis pathway (Fig.S3H). In the MF category, the enrichment in receptor regulator activity terms suggests that Brf1 may play a role through protein-protein interactions. In addition, the enrichment in the bile acid transporter activity term also suggested that Brf1 was closely related to liver metabolic function (Fig. S3I). The general GO annotation statistical diagram further details the results of the above analysis (Fig. 5E). The top 20 KEGG pathway annotations showed that Brf1 was mainly involved in energy metabolism and cell apoptosis (Fig. 5F).

Table 8.

Proteins difference analysis table.

Filtering Criteria Fold change > 2.0 and p value < 0.05 Protein which identified at least two of three replicates in one group while another group with all null value
Comparisons Significantly changing Consistent presence/absence
Upregulated Downregulated Upregulated Downregulated
Brf1 C vs Brf1 E 76 59 10 8

Table 9.

Different expression Proteins with good repeatability table.

Protein Protein Name Gene Name
O43677 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 subunit C1, mitochondrial NDUFC1
P00740 Coagulation factor IX F9
P01857 Immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 1 IGHG1
P08473 Neprilysin MME
P19256 Lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3 CD58
Q8N4U5 T-complex protein 11-like protein 2 TCP11L2
Q8N7R7 Cyclin-Y-like protein 1 CCNYL1
Q9NPF0 CD320 antigen CD320
Q9Y4P8 WD repeat domain phosphoinositide-interacting protein 2 WIPI2
Q9Y689 ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 5A ARL5A
A4FU69 EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 5 EFCAB5
O00423 Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 1 EML1
O95214 Leptin receptor overlapping transcript-like 1 LEPROTL1
P51530 DNA replication ATP-dependent helicase/nuclease DNA2 DNA2
Q14135 Transcription cofactor vestigial-like protein 4 VGLL4
Q32NC0 UPF0711 protein C18orf21 C18orf21
Q70CQ4 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 31 USP31
Q9H063 Repressor of RNA polymerase III transcription MAF1 homolog MAF1

4. Discussion

Brf1 is a specific transcription factor for the Pol III gene and is expressed widely throughout the body. Generally, Pol III gene transcription is active, and the levels of its downstream products tRNA and 5S rRNA are high in tumor cells 10, 16, 17. Brf1 is highly expressed in various human tumors, including HCC. Various oncogenes and tumor suppressor gene products can regulate the transcriptional activity of Brf1 and thus affect the transcript level of Pol III 11. Professor Shuping Zhong reported that reducing the expression of Brf1 inhibited the transcription of the Pol III gene, limited the transformation of immortalized hepatocytes, and slowed the growth and clone formation of HCC cells and the growth of transplanted HCC tumors in nude mice 18-21. There are literature reports that the knockout of Brf1 leads to embryonic lethality at the blastocyst stage and that the conditional deletion of Brf1 in gastrointestinal epithelial tissues, intestines, liver, and pancreas is incompatible with organ homeostasis.

The deletion of Brf1 in the adult intestine and liver induces apoptosis. Brf1 plays a permissive rather than a driving role in the development of pancreatic and intestinal epithelial cancers14. Alcohol induces the expression of Brf1 in hepatocytes10 and may be related to the activation of JNK122 Our results showed that Brf1 was significantly related to the AFP level, histological grade, OS, and Ishak fibrosis score. These results suggested that Brf1 was closely related to the development of HCC.

To study the role of Brf1 in the occurrence and development of HCC, a genetically modified mouse model was designed. Brf1 conditional knockout mice (NS5A-alb-Cre-ERT2-Brf1loxp/loxp) were distinguished by four aspects. First, NS5A is an oncogenic hepatitis C virus protein. Male mice expressing the NS5A gene fed a diet containing alcohol (the Lieber- DeCarli liquid diet, which contains an amount of alcohol roughly equal to 3 drinks/day) for 8 months had an HCC tumorigenesis rate of 100%. Second, the Cre gene was located downstream of the albumin gene. It was expressed only when the albumin gene was expressed. This strategy allowed us to determine spatially that Brf1 was knocked out only in the liver, while other organs were not affected. Third, Cre-ERT2 functioned only under activation by tamoxifen. In this way, Brf1 knockout was conditional in space and time. Fourth, we can use alcohol not only to naturally induce HCC tumorigenesis in mice to study the role of Brf1 in the occurrence of HCC but also to study the role of Brf1 in the development of HCC after tumor formation. However, liver function deteriorated greatly after Brf1 knockout. The liver is an important metabolic organ, and the mice did not survive longer than eight days. When Brf1 was knocked out, normal hepatocytes underwent apoptosis and died.

Based on the above findings, an interesting question emerged. Could knockout or knockdown of Brf1 also induce apoptosis in HCC cells and inhibit the development of HCC? Normal apoptosis plays an active role in ensuring cell growth and physiological development and maintaining the stability of the internal environment. Abnormal cell apoptosis promotes the occurrence and development of gastric cancer, HCC, colon cancer, and other malignant tumors 23. There have been many reports on the relationship between apoptosis and HCC development. Many molecules, such as miR-223-3, miRNA-1297, and BRD8, promote or inhibit the development of HCC by regulating apoptosis 24-26. Professor Xing Lin also noted that isoorientin in eupatorium induced apoptosis in HCC cells through the mitochondrial pathway and inhibited the development of HCC 27. The normal expression of the Brf1 and Pol III genes also plays an important role in maintaining physiological development and the stability of the internal environment. Dritan Liko et al. reported that loss of Brf1 function in the embryonic stage led to dysplasia of the liver, pancreas, and small intestine. Loss of Brf1 function led to homeostasis disorders of the liver, pancreas, and small intestine in mature mice 14. YH Jee et al. reported that mutations in the Brf1 gene caused bone and nervous system developmental disorders in children 14, 28, 29. Our experiments also showed that a large number of apoptotic bodies appeared in hepatocytes and that liver function worsened significantly in mice with conditional Brf1 knockout in the liver. There have been few reports on the relationship between Brf1 and apoptosis. Combining the evidence that Brf1 dysregulation promoted the development of HCC and that abnormal apoptosis promoted the development of HCC, we speculated that Brf1 promoted the development of HCC through inhibition of apoptosis. Can downregulation of Brf1 enhance apoptosis in HCC cells and then inhibit the development of HCC? Our results showed that downregulation of Brf1 inhibited HCC cell growth and clone formation, as well as subcutaneous tumor growth in mice. This was consistent with Dr. Lin's report that upregulation of Brf1 by alcohol administration promoted HCC cell growth and clone formation 30. In general, the rate of apoptosis in wild-type HepG2 and shBrf1 HepG2 cells was low. Brf1 knockdown increased the sensitivity of hepatoma cells to apoptosis induced by oxaliplatin. This finding provided an effective way to improve the chemosensitivity of HCC.

How does Brf1 regulate apoptosis? The relationships between the expression of Brf1 and the HCC apoptosis-related genes ICE, Apaf-1, Bcl-2, Fas/APO-1, c-myc, p53, and c-jun were explored by Western blotting. Brf1 expression was positively related only to Bcl-2 expression. Regression analysis of data from the TGCA database also suggested that Brf1 expression was positively related to Bcl-2 expression. Many studies have shown that Bcl-2 is closely related to HCC. TTP increased the sensitivity of head tumors to cisplatin by downregulating Bcl-231. A novel pregnenolone derivative modulated apoptosis via Bcl-2 family genes in HCC 32. Follistatin-like protein 5 inhibited HCC progression by inducing caspase-dependent apoptosis and the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins 33. Abnormal expression of IL-32α in HCC inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis through the inactivation of NF-κB and Bcl-2 34.

Sequencing, transcriptomics and proteomics approaches were used to further explore the mechanism by which Brf1 inhibits apoptosis. The results of these analyses consistently suggested that Brf1 was mainly related to energy metabolism, especially mitochondrial respiration and cell death/apoptosis, in terms of BPs. The organelle membrane was identified as the main site in the CC category. Protein-protein interaction was identified as the major mode in the MF category. We speculated that Brf1 promoted energy metabolism and mitochondrial function, which accelerated cell cycle progression, inhibited apoptosis, and ultimately led to the development of tumors.

The abnormal expression of Brf1 was related with the high level of phosphorylated AMPKα (pAMPKα)35. AMPK, a serine/threonine kinase, is activated under conditions of energy deficiency, enhancing ATP production and curtailing its consumption. Recent studies have shed light on an ancestral role of AMPK in safeguarding mitochondrial health, with numerous newly identified AMPK substrates implicated in various facets of mitochondrial homeostasis, including the process of mitophagy36. Energy metabolism is a basic function of cells. When metabolic disorders occur, the occurrence and development of tumors, including HCC, is promoted 37-39. Abnormal glucose metabolism promotes the proliferation of tumor cells 40. A large number of studies have shown that aerobic glycolysis is prevalent in a variety of cancers, including breast cancer41, gastric cancer 42 lung cancer 43 pancreatic cancer 44, colorectal cancer45. Bustamante E, Beyolu D 46 and Li S 47 demonstrated that inhibition of aerobic glycolysis in HCC cells promoted cell death. Many studies have confirmed that glycolysis is closely related to the development and drug resistance of HCC 48-50. Mitochondria are important sites of energy metabolism, and mitochondrial dysfunction is also closely related to chronic liver diseases as well as HCC 51. Various key enzymes in energy metabolism affect the cell cycle and affect the progression of HCC 52. However, there have been few reports on the direct relationship between energy metabolism and apoptosis, especially regarding the apoptosis-related molecule Bcl-2.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a large number of apoptotic bodies were found in Brf1 conditional knockout mice. Downregulation of Brf1 inhibited HCC development and increased the sensitivity of HCC cells to apoptosis induced by chemotherapy drugs. Brf1 expression was positively related to Bcl-2 expression. Energy metabolism played an important role, protein-protein interactions were a key mode, and the organelle membrane was the main site of this process. However, can full knockout of Brf1 induce complete HCC cell apoptosis and lead to HCC cell death? How does Brf1 regulate energy metabolism? How does energy metabolism regulate Bcl-2 expression or apoptosis? These issues need intensive exploration in the future.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures.

jcav15p5577s1.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

Table 4.

Histologic grade- multiple hypothesis test.

Group I Group J Estimated value(J-I) (95%CI) Adj. P value
G3 G2 - NA
G3 G1 - NA
G3 G4 -0.38048 -0.7484532 0.0446
G2 G1 - NA
G2 G4 -0.29118 -0.738371 0.1769
G1 G4 -0.18556 -0.7888 0.6182

Acknowledgments

We greatly thank the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation for supporting the research and work of Zaifa Hong.

Funding

The study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA017288 and AA024169), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81872234), China Postdoctoral Fund (No. 204897), Xiamen City Medical and Health Guidance Project (No. 3502Z20214ZD1026) and Xiamen Medical College School-Hospital Joint Funding Project (K2023-03).

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Some of the raw data in this study were sourced from public datasets. The exact information can be found in the Materials and Methods.

Author contributions

Shuping Zhong and Chundong Yu designed the current study. Yaping Xu and Zaifa Hong carried out the experiment and analyzed and interpreted the data. Chundong Yu supervised the study. Lupeng Wu and Yujian Liu collected the data. Tao Wang and Hongbin Zhang wrote the manuscript. Chundong Yu and Zaifa Hong revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work is appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. Written informed consent and any image information were obtained from the patient for publication of this study.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent and any accompanying images were obtained from the patient for publication of study.

References

  • 1.Cai Z, Liu Q. Understanding the Global Cancer Statistics 2018: implications for cancer control. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64:1017–20. doi: 10.1007/s11427-019-9816-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang C, Li R, Zhang Y, Gong J. Amarogentin Induces Apoptosis of Liver Cancer Cells via Upregulation of p53 and Downregulation of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase in Mice. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16:546–58. doi: 10.1177/1533034616657976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chao X, Wang G, Tang Y, Dong C, Li H, Wang B. et al. The effects and mechanism of peiminine-induced apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0201864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yuan P, Li J, Aipire A, Yang Y, Xia L, Wang X. et al. Cistanche tubulosa phenylethanoid glycosides induce apoptosis in H22 hepatocellular carcinoma cells through both extrinsic and intrinsic signaling pathways. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:275. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2201-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chang YC, Xu YH. Expression of Bcl-2 inhibited Fas-mediated apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7404 cells. Cell Res. 2000;10:233–42. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goodfellow SJ, Innes F, Derblay LE, MacLellan WR, Scott PH, White RJ. Regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription during hypertrophic growth. EMBO J. 2006;25:1522–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang Y, Wu H, Yang F, Ning J, Li M, Zhao C. et al. Prognostic Value of the Expression of DNA Repair-Related Biomarkers Mediated by Alcohol in Gastric Cancer Patients. Am J Pathol. 2018;188:367–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhong Q, Xi S, Liang J, Shi G, Huang Y, Zhang Y. et al. The significance of Brf1 overexpression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:6243–54. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fang Z, Yi Y, Shi G, Li S, Chen S, Lin Y. et al. Role of Brf1 interaction with ERalpha, and significance of its overexpression, in human breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2017;11:1752–67. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun Y, Lin P, Zhou X, Ren Y, He Y, Liang J. et al. TRIM26 promotes non-small cell lung cancer survival by inducing PBX1 degradation. Int J Biol Sci. 2023;19:2803–16. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.81726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lei J, Chen S, Zhong SJLr. Abnormal expression of TFIIIB subunits and RNA Pol III genes is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Res. 2017;1:112–20. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liko D, Mitchell L, Campbell KJ, Ridgway RA, Jones C, Dudek K. et al. Brf1 loss and not overexpression disrupts tissues homeostasis in the intestine, liver and pancreas. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:2535–50. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0316-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li M, Yang Y, Kuang Y, Gan X, Zeng W, Liu Y. et al. miR-365 induces hepatocellular carcinoma cell apoptosis through targeting Bcl-2. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13:2279–85. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 16.Hong Z, Lin M, Zhang Y, He Z, Zheng L, Zhong S. Role of betaine in inhibiting the induction of RNA Pol III gene transcription and cell growth caused by alcohol. Chem Biol Interact. 2020;325:109129. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen S, Yi Y, Xia T, Hong Z, Zhang Y, Shi G. et al. The influences of red wine in phenotypes of human cancer cells. Gene. 2019;702:194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.10.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnson SA, Dubeau L, Johnson DL. Enhanced RNA polymerase III-dependent transcription is required for oncogenic transformation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:19184–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802872200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Q, Jin J, Zhong Q, Yu X, Levy D, Zhong S. ERalpha mediates alcohol-induced deregulation of Pol III genes in breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:28–37. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang Q, Zhong Q, Evans AG, Levy D, Zhong S. Phosphorylation of histone H3 serine 28 modulates RNA polymerase III-dependent transcription. Oncogene. 2011;30:3943–52. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen Y, Chen C, Xiang J, Gao R, Wang G, Yu W. Functional Tea Extract Inhibits Cell Growth, Induces Apoptosis, and Causes G0/G1 Arrest in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line Possibly through Reduction in Telomerase Activity. Foods. 2024;13:1867. doi: 10.3390/foods13121867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yi Y, Huang C, Zhang Y, Tian S, Lei J, Chen S. et al. Exploring a common mechanism of alcohol-induced deregulation of RNA Pol III genes in liver and breast cells. Gene. 2017;626:309–18. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thangavelu L, Moglad E, Gupta G, Menon SV, Gaur A, Sharma S. et al. GAS5 lncRNA: A biomarker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;260:155424. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wan L, Yuan X, Liu M, Xue B. miRNA-223-3p regulates NLRP3 to promote apoptosis and inhibit proliferation of hep3B cells. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15:2429–35. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.He C, Wu T, Hao Y. Anlotinib induces hepatocellular carcinoma apoptosis and inhibits proliferation via Erk and Akt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503:3093–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu Z, Chen T, Mo H, Guo C, Liu Q. BRD8, which is negatively regulated by miR-876-3p, promotes the proliferation and apoptosis resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via KAT5. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2020;693:108550. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2020.108550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin X, Wei J, Chen Y, He P, Lin J, Tan S. et al. Isoorientin from Gypsophila elegans induces apoptosis in liver cancer cells via mitochondrial-mediated pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;187:187–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.04.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jee YH, Sowada N, Markello TC, Rezvani I, Borck G, Baron J. BRF1 mutations in a family with growth failure, markedly delayed bone age, and central nervous system anomalies. Clin Genet. 2017;91:739–47. doi: 10.1111/cge.12887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Borck G, Hog F, Dentici ML, Tan PL, Sowada N, Medeira A. et al. BRF1 mutations alter RNA polymerase III-dependent transcription and cause neurodevelopmental anomalies. Genome Res. 2015;25:609. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lin M, Huang C, Ren W, Chen J, Xia N, Zhong S. Mitogen- and Stress-Activated Protein Kinase 1 Mediates Alcohol-Upregulated Transcription of Brf1 and tRNA Genes to Cause Phenotypic Alteration. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:2067959. doi: 10.1155/2020/2067959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Park SB, Lee JH, Jeong WW, Kim YH, Cha HJ, Joe Y. et al. TTP mediates cisplatin-induced apoptosis of head and neck cancer cells by down-regulating the expression of Bcl-2. J Chemother. 2015;27:174–80. doi: 10.1179/1973947814Y.0000000234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Elhinnawi MA, Mohareb RM, Rady HM, Khalil WKB, Abd Elhalim MM, Elmegeed GA. Novel pregnenolone derivatives modulate apoptosis via Bcl-2 family genes in hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;183:125–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li C, Dai L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Cheng L. et al. Follistatin-like protein 5 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression by inducing caspase-dependent apoptosis and regulating Bcl-2 family proteins. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:6190–201. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kang Y, Park M, Yoon D, Han S, Lee C, Ji N. et al. Dysregulation of overexpressed IL-32α in hepatocellular carcinoma suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis through inactivation of NF-κB and Bcl-2. Cancer Lett. 2012;318:226–33. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu T, Zhang D, Lin M, Yu L, Dai T, Li S. et al. Exploring the Role and Mechanism of pAMPKalpha-Mediated Dysregulation of Brf1 and RNA Pol III Genes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:5554932. doi: 10.1155/2021/5554932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Herzig S, Shaw RJ. AMPK: guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:121–35. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mondal P, Gadad SS, Adhikari S, Ramos EI, Sen S, Prasad P. et al. TCF19 and p53 regulate transcription of TIGAR and SCO2 in HCC for mitochondrial energy metabolism and stress adaptation. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21814. doi: 10.1096/fj.202002486RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao H, Yan G, Zheng L, Zhou Y, Sheng H, Wu L. et al. STIM1 is a metabolic checkpoint regulating the invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2020;10:6483–99. doi: 10.7150/thno.44025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pittala S, Krelin Y, Shoshan-Barmatz V. Targeting Liver Cancer and Associated Pathologies in Mice with a Mitochondrial VDAC1-Based Peptide. Neoplasia. 2018;20:594–609. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hou X, Ouyang J, Tang L, Wu P, Deng X, Yan Q. et al. KCNK1 promotes proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells by activating lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and up-regulating H3K18 lactylation. PLoS Biol. 2024;22:e3002666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ciccarese C, Santoni M, Massari F, Modena A, Piva F, Conti A. et al. Metabolic Alterations in Renal and Prostate Cancer. Curr Drug Metab. 2016;17:150–5. doi: 10.2174/1389200216666151015112356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yuan LW, Yamashita H, Seto Y. Glucose metabolism in gastric cancer: The cutting-edge. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:2046–59. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Feinberg T, Herbig J, Kohl I, Las G, Cancilla JC, Torrecilla JS. et al. Cancer metabolism: the volatile signature of glycolysis-in vitro model in lung cancer cells. J Breath Res. 2017;11:016008. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa51d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang W, Wang Y, Huang Y, Yu J, Wang T, Li C. et al. 4-Octyl itaconate inhibits aerobic glycolysis by targeting GAPDH to promote cuproptosis in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;159:114301. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shuch B, Linehan WM, Srinivasan R. Aerobic glycolysis: a novel target in kidney cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13:711–9. doi: 10.1586/era.13.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Beyoglu D, Imbeaud S, Maurhofer O, Bioulac-Sage P, Zucman-Rossi J, Dufour JF. et al. Tissue metabolomics of hepatocellular carcinoma: tumor energy metabolism and the role of transcriptomic classification. Hepatology. 2013;58:229–38. doi: 10.1002/hep.26350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li S, Li J, Dai W, Zhang Q, Feng J, Wu L. et al. Genistein suppresses aerobic glycolysis and induces hepatocellular carcinoma cell death. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:1518–28. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Feng J, Dai W, Mao Y, Wu L, Li J, Chen K. et al. Simvastatin re-sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting HIF-1alpha/PPAR-gamma/PKM2-mediated glycolysis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:24. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-1528-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ma WK, Voss DM, Scharner J, Costa ASH, Lin KT, Jeon HY. et al. ASO-Based PKM Splice-Switching Therapy Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth. Cancer Res. 2022;82:900–15. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim J, Yu L, Chen W, Xu Y, Wu M, Todorova D. et al. Wild-Type p53 Promotes Cancer Metabolic Switch by Inducing PUMA-Dependent Suppression of Oxidative Phosphorylation. Cancer Cell. 2019;35:191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.012. e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang C, Zhao Y, Yu M, Qin J, Ye B, Wang Q. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Chronic Liver Disease. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44:3156–65. doi: 10.3390/cimb44070218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li D, Cheng X, Zheng W, Chen J. Glucosamine-6-Phosphate Isomerase 1 Promotes Tumor Progression and Indicates Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:4923–35. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S250094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures.

jcav15p5577s1.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Some of the raw data in this study were sourced from public datasets. The exact information can be found in the Materials and Methods.


Articles from Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Ivyspring International Publisher

RESOURCES