Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1988 Aug;41(8):910–914. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.8.910

Evaluation of the Microbact-24E bacterial identification system.

J M Ling 1, Y W Hui 1, G L French 1
PMCID: PMC1141627  PMID: 3049684

Abstract

The Microbact 24E (MB24E) system is a commercial microsystem for the identification of common clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting Gram negative bacilli, and consists of dehydrated substrates distributed in the wells of microtitre trays. This system was compared with the API20E for the identification of 386 bacterial isolates, which included 284 clinical and 102 environmental organisms. There was 97% and 91% agreement for the identification of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram negative bacilli, respectively. The identification of environmental isolates by both systems was less satisfactory. The API20E has a more extensive database than the MB24E and is thus more reliable for the identification of rare or unusual organisms, but the MB24E is cheaper, is easy and convenient to use, and is suitable for a routine microbiology laboratory.

Full text

PDF
910

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appelbaum P. C., Leathers D. J. Evaluation of the rapid NFT system for identification of gram-negative, nonfermenting rods. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):730–734. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.730-734.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blazevic D. J., Mackay D. L., Warwood N. M. Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 May;9(5):605–608. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.5.605-608.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castillo C. B., Bruckner D. A. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):754–757. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.754-757.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Costigan W. J., Hollick G. E. Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):301–302. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.301-302.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hayek L. J., Willis G. W. Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Mar;37(3):344–347. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Izard D., Husson M. O., Vincent P., Leclerc H., Monget D., Boeufgras J. M. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jul;20(1):51–54. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.1.51-54.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mugg P., Hill A. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Hyg (Lond) 1981 Oct;87(2):287–297. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400069503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES