Abstract
Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease caused by primary mucinous neoplasms. Here, we describe a case where a large ovarian tumor was initially removed laparoscopically, followed by an appendectomy. The patient was diagnosed with PMP arising from an ovarian mucinous borderline tumor with a KRAS mutation. Treatment included bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy, resulting in complete remission.
Keywords: kras mutation, mucinous borderline tumor, ovary, laparoscopic surgery, pseudomyxoma peritonei
Introduction
Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease characterized by loculated gelatinous ascites and peritoneal dissemination of implants [1], predominantly originating from the appendix and rarely from mucinous ovarian tumors [2]. The estimated incidence of PMP is one to two per one million people [3], suggesting that ovarian-originating PMP may occur in as few as two to four per 100 million people [4].
Historically, PMPs have been classified into three pathological subtypes: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis, and an intermediate group [5]. Recently, the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) proposed new consensus criteria categorizing PMPs based on acellular mucin, low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMC), high-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei, and high-grade mucinous carcinoma with signet ring cell types, which are relevant mainly for PMPs of gastrointestinal origin [6].
In the present case, the primary ovarian tumor was initially removed laparoscopically, followed by an appendectomy. We report a case of PMP arising from an ovarian mucinous borderline tumor with a KRAS mutation, which achieved complete remission following bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy.
Case presentation
A 77-year-old female patient presented with abdominal distension without pain or bowel obstructions, and sought consultation at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large, multi-separated cystic mass in the right ovary accompanied by ascites. Tumor markers showed a high serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (19.0 ng/ml, normal range: <5.0), but serum levels of cancer antigen (CA) 125 (16.7 U/ml, normal range: <35.0) and CA19-9 (28.2 U/ml, normal range: <37.0) were within normal limits. Preoperative MRI depicted a cystic mass approximately 20 cm in diameter with internal septations, consistent with an ovarian mucinous tumor (Figure 1A). Additionally, viscous ascites and intramural uterine fibroids were observed.
Approximately one month after the initial presentation, laparoscopic bilateral adnexectomy and total hysterectomy were performed with a preoperative diagnosis of benign to borderline malignant ovarian tumor and intramural uterine fibroids. During surgery, a giant cystic mass was visualized (Figure 2A). Approximately three liters of viscous fluid were aspirated from the mass without disrupting its contents (Figure 2B). Subsequently, the right ovarian tumor was resected (Figure 3), and approximately 150 ml of mucinous ascites was drained. Cytological examination of the ascitic fluid revealed mucin-producing tumor cells, consistent with a diagnosis of mucinous borderline tumor (Figure 4A). Macroscopic examination of the right ovary showed a polycystic appearance with mucus content, while the excised uterus exhibited features resembling adenomyoma and contained small fibroids (Figure 3). Pathologically, the right ovary exhibited multilayered mucinous epithelium with mild cellular atypia, confirming a diagnosis of a mucinous borderline tumor (Figure 4B). Immunohistochemical analysis showed ovarian tumor cells were positive for CK7 (Figure 4C) and CK20 (Figure 4D), and weakly positive for p53 (Figure 4E). Although macroscopic examination indicated complete tumor removal, viscous ascites persisted post surgery (Figure 1B).
Two months later, further evaluation revealed pseudomyxoma peritonei, prompting an open appendectomy to investigate a possible primary appendix origin. Approximately 200 ml of viscous ascites was drained during the procedure (Figure 5A). Peritoneal lavage with warm low molecular weight dextran solution was performed, along with removal of microscopic retroperitoneal metastases and placement of a port for chemotherapy administration. Pathological examination identified a mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix (Figure 5B).
Intraoperative assessment using the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) [7] revealed tiny metastatic lesions in the retroperitoneum, yielding a PCI score of 3. The completeness of the cytoreduction (CCR) score [8] was determined to be 0, indicating residual disease.
KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of both ovarian and appendiceal tumors were analyzed at LSI Medience Corporation (Tokyo, Japan) using the MEBGEN RASKET™-B Kit (MBL Medical and Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, Nagano, Japan), based on the method reported [9,10]. Only the KRAS G12V mutation was detected in the right ovarian tumor (Table 1).
Table 1. Resuts of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations of the right ovarian and appendiceal tumor.
RAS/BRAF | Right ovarian tumor | Appendiceal tumor |
RAS pan | mutation positive | (-) |
KRAS12 | G12V | |
KRAS13 | (-) | |
KRAS59 | (-) | |
KRAS61 | (-) | |
KRAS117 | (-) | |
KRAS146 | (-) | |
NRAS12 | (-) | |
NRAS13 | (-) | |
NRAS59 | (-) | |
NRAS61 | (-) | |
NRAS117 | (-) | |
NRAS146 | (-) | |
BRAF pan | (-) | (-) |
The final pathological diagnosis was PMP originating from an ovarian mucinous borderline tumor staged as pT1CNxMx, with KRAS G12V mutation. According to PSOGI classification [6], it was categorized as LGMC. The PCI score [7] was 3, and the CCR score [8] was 0.
Postoperatively, the patient received a total of six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, including systemic paclitaxel and bevacizumab, along with intraperitoneal cisplatin to prevent recurrence. As of two years and four months after the second surgery, there has been no evidence of recurrence (Figure 1C).
Discussion
Distinguishing between PMP associated with ovarian invasion and primary ovarian tumors can be challenging due to similarities between appendiceal tumors and borderline mucinous ovarian tumors [11]. Previous studies focusing on PMP originating from the appendix have identified GNAS and KRAS mutations as prominent driver genes with high mutation frequencies [12,13]. In contrast, ovarian-derived PMP is less commonly associated with GNAS or KRAS mutations but may involve mutations in other driver genes such as p53, protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type K (PTPRK), and DICER1 [4]. In this case, pathological examination identified the ovarian tumor as a mucinous borderline tumor, while the appendix exhibited a mucinous adenoma. Genetic analysis specifically detected the KRAS G12V mutation and tumor cells were partially positive for p53 in the ovarian tumor, although examinations for PTPRK and DICER1 gene mutations were not performed.
Given that the KRAS G12V mutation was exclusively found in the ovarian tumor, the diagnosis was PMP originating from the ovary. Prognostic factors in ovarian-originating PMP include not only CCR and PCI but also the involvement of genes like PTPRK and tumor markers like CA19-9 [4]. In this case, while the serum level of CEA was elevated, CA19-9 remained within normal limits. As an early recurrence factor, there have been reports that cases in which the tumor has already ruptured at the time of surgery often recur early [14]. However, in this case, there was no rupture during surgery, and it is possible that the patient is living without recurrence.
Among the first treatment options for PMP is CRS combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using cisplatin (CDDP) [15]. Studies have shown that laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC can lead to reduced hospital stays and fewer postoperative complications in carefully selected patients [16]. In this case, the disease was at a relatively early stage, and almost no tumor remained after the initial surgery, during which both the adnexa and the uterus were removed laparoscopically. The tumor was suspected to be primary PMP originating from an ovarian borderline tumor. To determine the tumor's primary origin the procedure, including an appendectomy, peritoneal washing with warm low molecular weight dextran solution, and the placement of a port in the abdominal cavity during the administration of anticancer drugs was performed. As a result, the primary site was not the appendix, and the second surgery was performed. Anti-angiogenic agents have been reported to be effective against PMP [17]. Although this case was at an early stage, a KRAS mutation was noted. Consequently, the postoperative chemotherapy regimen included systemic administration of paclitaxel and bevacizumab, along with intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin. Twenty-eight months after the second surgery, the patient is healthy without signs of recurrence, indicating a successful treatment outcome.
Conclusions
We reported a case of PMP arising from an ovarian mucinous borderline tumor with a KRAS mutation, which achieved complete remission with a bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy regimen. This case highlights the potential for successful outcomes in PMP when treated with a combination of surgical and targeted chemotherapeutic approaches. There has been no recurrence for 28 months.
Acknowledgments
We thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped us improve the manuscript. The authors also thank the cytotechnologists Mori S. and Kuwabara K. of Gujo City Hospital for their technical assistance.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethical Committee of Gujo City Hospital issued approval 24022901. Written consent was obtained from the patient before writing this case report.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Kenji Niwa, Kentaro Niwa, Masanori Isobe, Rui Kyogoku, Takuji Tanaka
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Kenji Niwa, Kentaro Niwa, Masanori Isobe, Rui Kyogoku, Takuji Tanaka
Drafting of the manuscript: Kenji Niwa, Kentaro Niwa, Masanori Isobe, Rui Kyogoku, Takuji Tanaka
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kenji Niwa, Kentaro Niwa, Masanori Isobe, Rui Kyogoku, Takuji Tanaka
Supervision: Kenji Niwa, Kentaro Niwa, Masanori Isobe, Rui Kyogoku, Takuji Tanaka
References
- 1.Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of current literature. Sherer DM, Abulafia O, Eliakim R. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2001;51:73–80. doi: 10.1159/000052897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia: the results of the peritoneal surface oncology group international (PSOGI) modified Delphi process. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:14–26. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Smeenk RM, Bruin SC, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ. Curr Probl Surg. 2008;45:527–575. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.The mutational landscape and prognostic indicators of pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from the ovary. Wang B, Yao J, Ma R, et al. Int J Cancer. 2021;148:2036–2047. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pseudomyxoma peritonei: new concepts in diagnosis, origin, nomenclature, and relationship to mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary. Ronnett BM, Shmookler BM, Sugarbaker PH, Kurman RJ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9575376/ Anat Pathol. 1997;2:197–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.From the Ronnett to the PSOGI classification system for pseudomyxoma peritonei: a validation study. Rufián-Andujar B, Valenzuela-Molina F, Rufián-Peña S, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:2819–2827. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09560-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prognostic significance of Sugarbaker's peritoneal cancer index for the operability of ovarian carcinoma. Lampe B, Kroll N, Piso P, Forner DM, Mallmann P. https://ijgc.bmj.com/content/25/1/135. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:135–144. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Secondary cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. Deraco M, Virzì S, Iusco DR, et al. BJOG. 2012;119:800–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clinical validation of newly developed multiplex kit using Luminex xMAP technology for detecting simultaneous RAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer: results of the RASKET-B study. Taniguchi H, Okamoto W, Muro K, et al. Neoplasia. 2018;20:1219–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Performance of Idylla(™) RAS-BRAF mutation test for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of colorectal cancer. Makutani Y, Sakai K, Yamada M, et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022;27:1180–1187. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02167-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mucinous tumours of appendix and ovary: an overview and evaluation of current practice. Rouzbahman M, Chetty R. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67:193–197. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Frequent GNAS mutations in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Nishikawa G, Sekine S, Ogawa R, et al. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:951–958. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Toward the molecular dissection of peritoneal pseudomyxoma. Pietrantonio F, Perrone F, Mennitto A, et al. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:2097–2103. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rapid recurrence of a ruptured mucinous borderline ovarian tumor harboring K-RAS mutation followed by progression into anaplastic carcinoma with TP53 mutation. Yang Y, Guan Y, Xu M, Liu J. Heliyon. 2022;8:0. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies by cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Spain: results of the national registry of the Spanish group of peritoneal oncologic surgery (REGECOP) Manzanedo I, Pereira F, Cascales-Campos P, et al. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3774–3787. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for limited peritoneal metastasis. The PSOGI international collaborative registry. Arjona-Sanchez A, Aziz O, Passot G, et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:1420–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bevacizumab for the treatment of non-resettable pseudomyxoma peritonei associated with mucinous ovarian tumor of low malignant potential - a comparison of two cases. Winer I, Buckanovich RJ. Case Rep Oncol. 2009;3:1–8. doi: 10.1159/000270179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]