Abstract
These guidelines refer to laboratory tests for monitoring changes in acute phase proteins in patients with an inflammatory response to tissue damage. Quantitative measurements of acute phase proteins are a valuable indicator of the presence, extent, and response of inflammation to treatment. When short term (less than 24 hours) changes in the inflammatory response are expected, quantitative assay of C reactive protein is the test of choice. The hyperproteinaemia that develops in response to a longer term (more than 24 hours) inflammatory response is complex and may vary from one disease to another. A test that is sensitive to the combined effect of several plasma proteins is therefore indicated, and appropriate tests include the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and plasma viscosity--the latter having several advantages. Tests for monitoring short term and long term changes in acute phase proteins are complementary and should be used for different clinical purposes; no one test is ideal for all clinical situations. A quality control programme is an essential component of laboratory tests for monitoring the acute phase response.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e5f3/4e5f32a8462a110ec4bbf37238f184ee4eba72d0" alt="1203"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68c87/68c87a5c80cafd743d5f965cc64af3d1438cec3b" alt="1204"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6351/d635184a20ee54c3301cdd28a0ee9907f580d259" alt="1205"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b640b/b640bdc5058816f08b23a2b1dd8305612392ede0" alt="1206"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97047/97047360848b6cdb79e4dc5a0555f0ec84cdcb60" alt="1207"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ba4d/3ba4d9f89058293691d1192a72f567ca6973c221" alt="1208"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afbcb/afbcb7898733fd46354fd6803c302d592c8d2111" alt="1209"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ba6e/0ba6e388a3c849da01091737f2c5ce41127f0db0" alt="1210"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d09f/6d09ffa75dc1104224809db70d8f8b208f90b034" alt="1211"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e6cb/5e6cbc0484bae47862acfbe695c8ff377128a51f" alt="1212"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bull B. S., Brecher G. An evaluation of the relative merits of the Wintrobe and Westergren sedimentation methods, including hematocrit correction. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Oct;62(4):502–510. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/62.4.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bull B. S. Clinical and laboratory implications of present ESR methodology. Clin Lab Haematol. 1981;3(4):283–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moseley D. L., Bull B. S. A comparison of the Wintrobe, the Westergren and the ZSR erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) methods to a candidate reference method. Clin Lab Haematol. 1982;4(2):169–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]