Abstract
In prion diseases (PrDs), aggregates of misfolded prion protein (PrPSc) accumulate not only in the brain but also in extraneural organs. This raises the question whether prion-specific pathologies arise also extraneurally. Here we sequenced mRNA transcripts in skeletal muscle, spleen and blood of prion-inoculated mice at eight timepoints during disease progression. We detected gene-expression changes in all three organs, with skeletal muscle showing the most consistent alterations. The glutamate-ammonia ligase (GLUL) gene exhibited uniform upregulation in skeletal muscles of mice infected with three distinct scrapie prion strains (RML, ME7, and 22L) and in victims of human sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. GLUL dysregulation was accompanied by changes in glutamate/glutamine metabolism, leading to reduced glutamate levels in skeletal muscle. None of these changes were observed in skeletal muscle of humans with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, or dementia with Lewy bodies, suggesting that they are specific to prion diseases. These findings reveal an unexpected metabolic dimension of prion infections and point to a potential role for GLUL dysregulation in the glutamate/glutamine metabolism in prion-affected skeletal muscle.
Author summary
This study examined how prion diseases, typically affecting the brain, also impact other body tissues. We analyzed gene activity in skeletal muscle, spleen, and blood of prion-infected mice across different disease stages. We found significant gene expression changes, particularly in skeletal muscle. The GLUL gene was consistently upregulated in the muscles of prion infected mice and in humans with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. This led to disruptions in glutamate and glutamine metabolism, reducing glutamate levels in muscle tissue. These changes were unique to prion diseases and not seen in other neurodegenerative conditions like ALS or Alzheimer’s. The findings suggest that prion infections cause specific metabolic disruptions in skeletal muscle, linked to the GLUL gene.
Introduction
Prions are infectious protein aggregates that cause neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). Prions multiplicate through the seeded conversion of the physiological cellular prion protein PrPC into a misfolded, aggregated conformer termed PrPSc [1]. While PrPC is primarily expressed in the nervous system, it is also found in skeletal muscle and, to a lesser extent, in lymphoreticular tissue and blood [2,3]. The widespread expression of PrPC enables PrPSc propagation at multiple sites in prion infections. Prions can enter the body through the gastrointestinal system and accumulate in lymphoid tissue, leading to neuroinvasion via peripheral nerves [4,5]. Prion seeds are present in the spleen long before the onset of clinical symptoms [6–8]. PrPSc can also be present in the blood, where it binds to plasminogen [9]. Consequently, blood is a documented route of infection and a significant challenge for transfusion medicine [10, 11]. PrPSc can be detected in blood with Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (PMCA) as early as 2 months after inoculation [12,13]. However, PMCA is not as sensitive for detecting sporadic CJD (sCJD) [14, 15], which aligns with findings that prion transmission through blood transfusion was reported for vCJD but not for sCJD [16].
Muscle tissue has been a focal point in PrDs due to the potential for significant dietary exposure to prions through meat consumption [17,18]. This concern arises from the potential for prions to be present in muscle tissue, thereby posing a risk of transmission through the food supply. Skeletal muscles of patients with acquired and sporadic CJD show PrPSc deposits in peripheral nerve fibers [19]. Unlike other organs, prions in skeletal muscle are found only late in disease [6,20]. These findings suggest that the pathogenic processes are systemic and not confined to the brain, providing possible sources for early detection.
Using PrPSc as a biomarker for early diagnosis of PrDs faces several challenges. For one, the levels of PrPSc at early disease stages are often too low for detection. Furthermore, distinct prion strains can have unique pathobiological characteristics that influence their presence in peripheral tissues and body fluids [21]. Growing evidence indicates that gene-expression changes in extraneural tissues, including blood, spleen, and skeletal muscle, can serve as markers of neurodegenerative disease progression [22–25]. RNA sequencing of whole blood in Parkinson’s disease uncovered early immune cell changes and distinct gene expression patterns [26]. A recent study linked exaggerated type I myofiber grouping in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) to altered gene expression in muscle, suggesting significant neuromuscular junction involvement and remodeling [27]. Analogously, differential expression of muscle-specific genes was found in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, suggesting muscle-level changes alongside neural degeneration [28]. Lymphoid tissue also accumulates prions [29,30] and may experience molecular changes with diagnostic and prognostic potential.
Here we have conducted transcriptome-wide RNA sequencing analyses on blood, skeletal muscle, and spleen of mice after intracerebral exposure to prions and in autoptic skeletal muscle of humans diagnosed with sCJD. We found that glutamate-ammonia ligase (GLUL) is uniquely upregulated in skeletal muscle of prion-infected mice and humans, but not in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). This finding, in conjunction with observed reductions in glutamate levels in both animal models and human cases of prion infection, suggests a disruption in glutamate/glutamine metabolism in skeletal muscles as the disease progresses. This points to a prion-specific muscular pathophysiology diverging from other neurodegenerative disorders.
Results
Transcriptional derangement in skeletal muscle during prion disease progression
For this study, we used a previously established cohort of wild-type 2-month old C57BL/6 mice [31] which we had injected intracerebrally (i.c.) with scrapie prions (6th consecutive mouse-to-mouse passage of mouse-adapted Rocky Mountain Laboratory sheep scrapie prions, abbreviated as RML6). For control, we injected non-infectious brain homogenate (NBH). Spleen, hindlimb skeletal muscle and blood were collected during necropsy at 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 weeks-post-inoculation (wpi) as well as at the terminal stage of disease (Fig 1A). We stratified our collective into three categories: early stage (4 and 8 wpi), pre-symptomatic stage (12, 14, 16 wpi) and symptomatic stage (18, 20, wpi and terminal) [32] (Fig 1A).
We defined differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as transcripts with absolute log2 fold change |log2FC| > 0.5 and p-value < 0.05 (Fig 1B). Transcriptional changes in blood were inhomogeneous during disease progression (Fig 1B), possibly because peripheral blood may undergo changes in its cellular composition during infection or inflammation. Nevertheless, in both early timepoints DEGs associated with blood coagulation and hemostasis were detected (S1A and S1B Fig and S1 and S2 Tables). During the presymptomatic and symptomatic stages we did not identify any overlapping changes in blood. In contrast, major transcriptional changes in the spleen were found in terminal disease (Fig 1B). Except for Pcdh18, which was significantly altered in both early stage timepoints, there was no overlap between DEGs in blood and spleen (S3 Table).
Compared to other analyzed organs, the number of DEGs in skeletal muscle remained relatively constant throughout the course of the disease (Fig 1B). However, this consistent pattern was punctuated by recurrent up- or downregulation of specific genes at distinct disease stages. During the presymptomatic stage a single gene, Adh1, displayed upregulation, whereas the symptomatic stage featured elevated expression of Mir8114, Glul, and Pik3r1 (S3 Table). To allow for interactive exploration of the results described in this study and for integration with our previously reported findings [31], we constructed a searchable database of gene expression profiles from brain and extraneural organs available for visualization and download at https://fgcz-shiny.uzh.ch/priontranscriptomics/.
Lack of post-transcriptional changes in extra-neural organs of prion-inoculated mice
We next calculated the genome-wide adenosine-to-inosine editing index (AEI) to measure global RNA editing levels [33], the preferential site of RNA editing in mammals. Global editing levels in blood rose steadily during aging but were independent of prion inoculation (S2A Fig). No AEI differences were seen in muscle or spleen (S2B and S2C Fig). To determine recoding of individual transcripts, we aligned our sequencing results to previously published high-confidence AEI recoding sites [34]. We found Flnb and Copa in the spleen and Cog3 in blood to be significantly recoded (S2D Fig).
Alternative splicing can give rise to disease-associated differentially used transcripts [35]. In contrast to our previous results in the brain [31], the present alternative splicing analyses in extraneural organs showed only minor alterations (S2E Fig). Necap2, Myl6 and Srsf5 transcripts were alternatively spliced across multiple organs and prion incubation times (S4 Table). Only in two out of a total of 21 splice variants differential transcript usage was accompanied by differential gene expression: upregulation of Myl6 in blood at 4 wpi and downregulation of Ms4a6c in blood at 14 wpi.
Prion Deposits Are Found in Spleen and Skeletal Muscles at All Time Points, with Early Absence in Skeletal Muscles of Mice Infected with RML and Presence in ME7 and 22L Strains
To determine whether these molecular changes are directly caused by on-site prion deposits, we conducted detection assays at various time points using Proteinase K-treated Western Blot (PK-WB) and RT-QuIC assays. We used organs from the same RML prion-infected mice and corresponding NBH control mice previously used for bulk RNA sequencing, selecting a single time point from each stage: 8 wpi for the early stage, 16 wpi for the presymptomatic stage, and the terminal stage for the symptomatic stage. Blood was excluded from this analysis due to hemolysis during RNA sequencing, which made it impossible to separate and collect plasma for RT-QuIC. Whole blood was unsuitable for analysis because blood cells and their products inhibit the RT-QuIC seeding response [36,37], increasing the likelihood of false negatives. Additionally, blood-derived prions cannot be detected via PK-WB due to low titers.
As shown by other groups [6,38,39], the spleen accumulated prions early in intracerebrally inoculated mice, despite low PrPC expression, and the infectious agent load remained constant throughout disease progression (S3A and S3B Fig).
The concentration of prions in skeletal muscles is reported to be 10,000 times lower than in the brain, making detection challenging [40,41]. To address this limitation, we used the sodium phosphotungstate anion (NaPTA) reagent with magnesium chloride (MgCl2) to precipitate prions [42]. Consistent with other studies [6,20], we detected prions at 16 wpi and at the terminal stage. However, prion deposits were not observed at the early time point (8 wpi) in mice infected with the RML prion strain. In contrast, prions were detected in the skeletal muscles of mice infected with other prion strains (ME7 and 22L) at all analyzed time points (S4A and S4B Fig). At 8 wpi, prions were detected in mice infected with the ME7 strain in two out of three biological replicates, whereas all replicates showed prion presence in mice infected with the 22L strain. Notably, the PK-WB assay lacked the sensitivity to detect prions at 8 wpi (S4B Fig), whereas RT-QuIC demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (S4A Fig).
Consistently altered gene modules in skeletal muscle during prion disease progression
WGCNA (Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis) identifies modules of highly correlated genes, which helps detecting coordinated changes in gene expression. We utilized WGCNA in conjunction with differential expression (DE) analysis to deduce organ-specific gene co-expression networks (S5 Table). To summarize the gene-expression levels of individual network modules, we calculated module eigengenes (MEs) representing the first principal component of each module. We identified 25 and 13 modules in blood and spleen, respectively, but we did not find any significant differences between the MEs of these modules in the two study groups across all three disease time stages (S5A and S5B Fig). Conversely, in the muscle co-expression network, two of 39 modules (“orange” and “darkgreen”) showed significant differences in MEs between NBH controls and prions throughout disease progression (S5C Fig). The “orange” module (163 genes) was upregulated, while the “darkgreen” module (198 genes) was downregulated as the disease advanced (Fig 2A).
To better understand these pathophysiological events, we identified genes exhibiting the most notable and consistent expression changes throughout the disease progression within each module of interest. Hub genes were defined by module membership (MM) which is a measure of the correlation between the expression pattern of a given gene and the overall expression pattern of all the genes within the module. Additionally, we derived a gene significance score from p-values obtained using DESeq2 [43]—a tool for identifying expression changes in RNA-seq data—across time stages. Strikingly, the gene significance score was found to be highly correlated (orange module R = 0.81; and darkgreen module R = 0.7) with module membership (Fig 2B). The convergence of two different methods on the same set of genes provides evidence for the robustness of hub gene detection. The top 20 hub genes for orange and darkgreen module are labeled in Fig 2C.
Validation cohort confirms robustness of hub genes for muscle co-expression network in prion-infected mice
To test the reliability and validity of our findings, we investigated a validation cohort comprising samples from each time stage. We first asked whether the muscle co-expression network modules in the main cohort were preserved in the validation cohort. All modules (except for the “plum”, “orangered3”, and “brown” modules) showed high preservation with a z-summary statistic >1.96 (S6A Fig). We then calculated the ME for each sample in the validation cohort using the same gene module assignment as in the main cohort. Again, the “orange” and “darkgreen” modules were the most affected, exhibiting significant ME differences between RML6 and NBH at both presymptomatic and symptomatic stages (6B Fig). Notably, the trend of ME changes was already evident in the early stage and consistent with the trend observed in the main cohort (Fig 3A).
To further validate our results, we identified hub genes for the validation cohort using MM values that correlated with those of the main cohort (orange module R = 0.55; darkgreen module R = 0.5). The overlapping hub genes between the two cohorts are shown in Fig 4B and 4C. The high correlation indicates that the hub genes identified in the main cohort were robust and reliable in the validation cohort as well. These findings reinforce the idea that the identified hub genes are biologically significant, offering insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease.
Upregulation of glutamate-ammonia ligase in skeletal muscles of human and murine prion-diseases
To test whether our findings apply to human PrDs, we performed RNA sequencing on skeletal muscles of sCJD patients (n = 6). For control, we used skeletal muscles of subjects without clinical or pathological diagnosis of neurodegeneration matched for age, gender, and specimen age (n = 4) (see S6 Table for clinical details). The total RNA extracted from the Psoas major muscle exhibited significant degradation (S7A Fig). However, principal component analysis highlighted grouping of sCJD and control tissues in two distinct clusters (S7B and S7C Fig). Based on |log2FC| > 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 (see Methods for details), we identified a total of 365 DEGs, of which 258 were protein-coding (S7 Table).
We then compared the DEGs from sCJD samples with hub genes from the two mouse cohorts, and found only one overlapping gene, glutamate ammonia-ligase (GLUL), which was significantly upregulated in human and mouse samples (Fig 3D–3E). We further validated the upregulation of GLUL at the protein level using Western Blot (Fig 3F–3G). We also re-evaluated the upregulation of Glul across all individual timepoints in skeletal muscles of prion-infected mice, noting that it remains consistently upregulated. The only exception was at timepoint 12 wpi, where the upregulation does not exceed Log2FC > 0.5 (S5D Fig).
While examining post-mortem muscle samples from human patients with sporadic sCJD, we found numerous changes in gene expression that differed from those observed in mouse models. These differences might have only become apparent during the late stages of the disease, where nonspecific changes, possibly influenced by factors like prolonged immobilization, are more likely to occur. However, our analysis of mouse models provides strong evidence that GLUL correlates with the disease process at earlier stages.
GLUL is upregulated in mice infected with a variety of prion strains
Prion strains are infectious isolates exhibiting distinct biological properties, such as tissue tropism, incubation time, and neuropathological features [44]. Different prion strains may elicit different transcriptional responses in their hosts. To determine whether Glul alterations are a common feature across prion strains, we tested whether Glul is changed in mice infected with a panel of mouse-adapted prion strains. To this end, we intracerebrally injected an additional cohort of C57BL/6 mice with ME7, 22L, RML6, and NBH, and collected hindlimb skeletal muscle at different time points (8 wpi, 16 wpi and terminal) corresponding to each of the three aforementioned disease stages.
At 8 wpi, Glul RNA and protein levels were not altered in both ME7 and 22L strains. At the protein level, the most substantial upregulation was found in RML6-infected animals (Fig 4A–4C). The delayed Glul upregulation in mice inoculated with the ME7 and 22L strains may be related to differences in disease onset, as RML6 induced disease more quickly than ME7 and 22L. Glul expression was significantly altered at both the RNA (S8 Table) and protein level in RML6 and ME7 strains, while only at RNA level in 22L strain at 16 wpi. In terminally sick mice, both RNA and protein level of Glul were upregulated in all strains (Fig 4A–4C). These results suggest that Glul upregulation is a universal feature across various prion diseases, highlighting its potential role in the underlying pathophysiological processes of these conditions. Such a consistent pattern of dysregulation suggests that glutamate ammonia ligase may influence disease progression and clinical manifestations in prion-affected individuals.
GLUL upregulation is specific to prion diseases
To further investigate the disease specificity of Glul dysregulation, we examined its protein levels in hindlimb skeletal muscles of mouse models for ALS, AD, and DLB. Interestingly, Glul did not exhibit upregulation in these models. The confinement of Glul upregulation to prion diseases points to specific pathogenetic mechanisms that do not occur in other types of neurodegenerations (S8A and S8B Fig). To corroborate these findings, we extended our investigation to skeletal muscle necropsies from patients with familial ALS, FTD (Frontotemporal Dementia), AD, and DLB. Again, GLUL protein levels were unaltered in AD, DLB and FTD, highlighting its distinct role in prion diseases compared to other neurodegenerative conditions. Notably, GLUL protein levels were significantly downregulated in all three individuals affected by ALS (Fig 4D–4E).
Glutamate-glutamine biosynthesis in muscle is affected during prion disease progression
Glul catalyzes the conversion of glutamate to glutamine, whereas glutaminase carries out the opposite process. Given the increased Glul expression in skeletal muscle during prion disease progression, we investigated whether this metabolic pathway was affected. We measured glutaminase, glutamate and glutamine levels in muscle lysates from C57BL/6 mice inoculated with ME7, 22L and RML6 brain homogenates, as well as NBH for control. At the early disease stage, there were no significant alterations in the levels of glutamate and glutamine (S9A and S9E Fig), even in RML6-infected animals, despite the increased expression levels of Glul. This might be attributable to a compensatory effect of glutaminase upregulation (S8D and S8E Fig) which may maintain glutamate homeostasis and offset the increased expression of Glul. Notably, we observed an increase in the expression of Glul at 16 wpi (two weeks prior to the onset of clinical signs of prion disease). Despite the Glul upregulation, the balance of glutamate and glutamine was maintained (S9A and S9E Fig), as well as glutaminase levels (S8D and S8E Fig), pointing to a metabolic ability restoring the levels of glutamate consumed by Glul upregulation. At the terminal stage of the disease, the levels of glutamate were conspicuously reduced (S9A Fig), plausibly due to a significant upregulation of Glul. However, the levels of glutamine and glutaminase were unchanged (Figs 9E, S8D and S8E). Glutamate reduction was also detected in muscle necropsies of sCJD patients versus age- and sex-matched controls (S9B Fig) despite unchanged glutamine levels (S9F Fig).
We then examined the levels of glutaminase, glutamate, and glutamine in skeletal muscles of aged mouse models for AD, DLB, and ALS. Unlike in prion diseases, we found no significant alterations in glutaminase (S8A and S8C Fig), glutamate (S9C Fig), and glutamine (S9G Fig) levels in these neurodegenerative disorders. This highlights the specificity of the observed metabolic changes in prion diseases. We then evaluated glutamate and glutamine levels in skeletal muscles of human AD, DLB, ALS and FTD cases. Our results revealed a reduction in glutamate levels solely in the context of ALS, mirroring the observed trend in prion diseases (S9D and S9H Fig). However, it is important to note that while GLUL expression was downregulated in ALS, it was upregulated in prion diseases.
Discussion
Transcriptional changes observed in the early phases of PrDs offer valuable insights into the pathogenic mechanisms at play in extraneural organs. These alterations in gene expression not only enhance our understanding of the disease’s progression but also underscore the systemic nature of PrDs, revealing critical aspects of their pathology beyond the central nervous system. Here we conducted a comprehensive transcriptomic characterization of extraneural organs known to harbor prions. We hypothesized that the presence of prions in these organs could result in changes to RNA processing, or modifications to the abundance of specific transcripts. By examining multiple timestages throughout the progression of the disease in prion-inoculated mice, this investigation provides insights into the pathological processes preceding the onset of clinical symptoms. The selection of timestages was based on a recent study where authors defined disease stages based on clinically relevant EEG (electroencephalography): recordings between NBH and RML mice groups began to diverge at 10 wpi and became significantly different at 18 wpi marking the beginning of clinical onset [32]. Other authors defined symptomatic stage as the period from 18 wpi to terminal stage based on motor function impairments [31].
Significant changes in gene expression were observed in all three organs. In the spleen, major transcriptional alterations were detected only at the terminal stage of the disease, although prions were locally present from the very beginning of the prion pathology. The early arrival of prions in the spleen may be due to the entry of a portion of the inoculum into the vascular compartment during the injection [45] combined with efficient prion replication in the follicular dendritic cells that form the scaffold of lymphoid follicles [46–50]. Such evidence indicates that, although prions accumulate in the spleen, they do not cause significant transcriptional derangements. Notably, this finding aligns with previous research showing that prion infiltration in lymphoid tissues does not lead to substantial morphological or functional alterations. Indeed, infected animals can sustain normal humoral and cell-mediated immune responses [51–53].
Conversely, blood samples displayed upregulation of numerous transcripts during the early stages of prion exposure, of which a significant fraction was related to hemostasis.
Except for Flnb, Copa and Cog3, we found no evidence for broad dysregulation of posttranscriptional RNA editing, in contrast to a recent report [54] but in line with our previous findings [31]. Furthermore, splicing analysis suggests that alternative splicing was largely unlinked from gene expression changes in extraneural organs.
Gene-expression changes were detected in both blood and spleen but were not consistent across all timepoints. However, the transcriptome of skeletal muscle exhibited consistent alterations throughout disease progression, even though prions were detectable only at the presymptomatic and symptomatic stages in mice infected with RML prion strain. It suggests that many of these changes were secondary consequences of prion spread in the CNS. Using WGCNA, we identified two primary gene subsets in skeletal muscle exhibiting progressive changes that became evident in the early stage of disease. Validation of these findings in an independent cohort of mice, in which sequencing libraries were prepared several months after RNA extraction from snap-frozen skeletal muscles by a different researcher, enhances the robustness of the results. This validation underscores the consistency of the findings even in the face of significant technical variability introduced by the procedures. These results have potential applications in monitoring disease progression following therapeutics administration, in conjunction with molecular and behavioral assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy [55–57].
We evaluated the relevance of our findings in humans by conducting RNA sequencing on skeletal muscle samples obtained from individuals with sCJD and control individuals without neurological impairments. While we were unable to confidently evaluate the level of preservation of mouse and human muscle gene-expression networks, we found little overlap between the joint set of hub genes identified across two mouse cohorts and human DEGs. There may be various reasons for this discrepancy, including genetic differences between mice and humans resulting in varying biological responses to similar diseases [58]. Additionally, different conditions were employed to process the human samples and decontaminate them from prions, which may have influenced the results [59]. Variations in disease stage or severity, as well as differences in the tissue types analyzed (hindlimb muscle in animals vs. psoas muscle in humans), could have also played a role in the observed differences [60]. Finally, there may be underlying differences in the disease biology between humans and mice that are not yet fully understood or characterized [61]. Despite the abovementioned limitations in translating mouse findings to human ones, we found that GLUL, which was a strong hub gene in the upregulated “orange” module in the mouse study, was significantly upregulated in human sCJD samples, as confirmed at the protein level by Western Blot analysis. Hence, the consistent upregulation of GLUL may be indicative of its significant role in the pathophysiology of human PrDs, potentially contributing to the progression of the disease, especially in its early stages. GLUL is a glutamate-ammonia ligase that catalyzes the synthesis of glutamine from glutamate and ammonia in an ATP-dependent reaction. While prions were undetectable in skeletal muscles at early stages in mice infected with the RML6 prion strain, Glul upregulation was already evident, suggesting it might originate as a secondary consequence of brain infection or from other affected organs. Despite the presence of prions in the skeletal muscles of mice infected with ME7 and 22L prion strains, Glul upregulation was milder than that seen with RML6 prions, supporting the hypothesis that such upregulation is not directly caused by on-site prions in skeletal muscle.
There is some evidence that GLUL expression in the brain is not altered in PrDs. Glul mRNA levels were unchanged in the brains of mice infected with prions compared to uninfected mice [31]. Another recent study found that GLUL expression was also unchanged in the brains of patients with sCJD compared to healthy controls [62]. Therefore, the alterations in glutamate/glutamine metabolism in prion-infected brains [63] that were proposed to contribute to neurodegeneration and cognitive dysfunctions, are unlikely to stem from any changes in brain-resident GLUL. Instead, Glul expression was consistently upregulated in the skeletal muscles of animals throughout the disease, and this finding was present after infection with multiple prion strains. This suggests that GLUL may also be upregulated before the clinical onset of human PrDs. The identification of a common pathological phenotype among these diseases would be a significant finding, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms specific to these conditions at early stages. It is important to note that, despite the limited availability of skeletal muscle specimens from patients with neurodegenerative diseases, this phenomenon appears to be unique to prion diseases and does not occur in other common neurodegenerative disorders such as ALS, AD, or DLB. Interestingly, GLUL protein levels were consistently found to be downregulated in human ALS. This distinct pattern underscores the unique role of GLUL in the pathophysiology of PrDs, highlighting their differentiation from other neurodegenerative conditions in terms of molecular and cellular mechanisms. We hypothesized that the upregulation of GLUL protein in skeletal muscle may be linked to a metabolic dysfunction in the glutamate-glutamine pathway. Prior research had shown the direct influence of glutamine levels on the expression of GLUL in skeletal muscle cells [64]. Building upon this finding, it is plausible to speculate that a potential systemic deficit in glutamine levels might contribute to the observed upregulation of GLUL in skeletal muscle. Skeletal muscle exerts a pivotal role in glutamine storage, production, and release into the bloodstream. This hypothesis gains further support from the significant reduction in glutamate levels observed, which could be attributed to the heightened activity of GLUL in response to altered glutamine availability. This was unexpected as previous studies had reported increased levels of glutamate and glutamine in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurodegenerative diseases, including PrDs [63]. The regulation of glutamate and glutamine metabolism in skeletal muscle differs from that in the brain, and the upregulation of GLUL in skeletal muscle may have a distinct role in the pathology of PrDs In contrast, the absence of such GLUL upregulation in other NDDs might signify a distinct metabolic response. The lack of compensatory GLUL expression could contribute to the sustained alterations in glutamine and glutamate levels seen in those conditions. Therefore, the specific association between GLUL upregulation and prion diseases suggests a unique interplay between glutamine/glutamate metabolism and disease progression, setting PrDs apart from other NDDs.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Animal experiments were approved by the Veterinary Office of the Canton Zurich (permit numbers ZH41/2012, ZH90/2013, ZH040/15, ZH243/15) and carried out in compliance with the Swiss Animal Protection Law. In Switzerland, permit numbers are equivalent to approval numbers. This project is a follow-up to a previous study published in PLOS Pathogens, where we used the same specification format for the animal permits (you can find the article here). The study was approved by the Federal Office for Food Safety and Veterinary Medicine (Veterinäramt Zürich, Zollstrasse 20, 8090 Zürich) by Dr. Simone Gilg. The animals used in this study are the same as those in the aforementioned publication. Animal discomfort and suffering was minimized as much as possible and individual housing was avoided.
We obtained sCJD anonymized skeletal muscle samples from an approved study sanctioned by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of the Canton of Zurich under approval number #2019–01479 and a written informed consent was received prior to participation.
The experimental protocols involving GLUL’s specificity validation test on other neurodegenerative diseases by using human participants adhered strictly to the guidelines set by French regulations. Prior to participation, comprehensive written informed consent was diligently obtained from all individuals, including those who underwent skeletal muscle necropsies for Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Familial SLA), Fronto-Temporal Dementia with ALS (DFT-SLA), and pure cases of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Dementia with Lewy Body (LBD). Human biological samples and associated data were obtained from Tissu-Tumorothèque Est (CRB-HCL, Hospices Civils de Lyon Biobank, BB-0033-00046).
Animals used in the study
Prion-inoculated and control-injected mice were regularly monitored for the development of clinical signs, according to well-established procedures using humane termination criteria. Intracerebral injections and transcardiac perfusions were performed in deeply anesthetized mice. Habituation periods before the experiment began were included. Male C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Charles River, Germany. Mice were housed in a conventional sanitary facility and monitored for the presence of all viral, parasitic, and bacterial species listed in the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Associations (FELASA). The facility was tested positive for Murine Norovirus and Helicobacter spp. The mice were housed in IVC type II long cages and up to five animals were housed in the same cage which were staffed with individual apartments. Mice had unrestricted access to sterilized drinking water and were fed ad libitum a pelleted mouse diet. The light/dark cycle consisted of 12/12 h with artificial light. The temperature in the room was 21 ± 1°C with a relative humidity of 50 ± 5%. Air pressure was regulated at 50 Pa, with 15 complete changes of filtered air per hour by a HEPA filter.
Prion inoculations and processing of tissue samples
Animals, prion inoculation and necropsy procedures are identical to those described in [31]. C57BL/6J male mice were inoculated in the right hemisphere with either 30 μl of passage 6 of Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML6), or 22L, or ME7 strain mouse-adapted scrapie prions containing 9.02 LD50 of infectious units per ml in 10% w/v homogenate. Non-infectious brain homogenate (NBH) from CD1 mice was used as a negative control. Mice were assigned randomly to experimental groups. Animals were monitored at least thrice per week, after the clinical onset of PrDs, they were monitored daily, and prion-inoculated mice were terminated upon evident signs of terminal disease. NBH-inoculated mice were sacrificed 13 days after the termination of the last prion-inoculated mice. Whole blood, spleen and muscle were dissected, snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80°C prior to sequence library generation.
Processing of AD, DLB and ALS tissue samples
Double-transgenic APP/PS1 mice (n = 3; 8 months of age) were used as AD mouse models from which we have collected hindlimb skeletal muscles. For the DLB mouse model, hindlimb skeletal muscles of transgenic A53T synuclein mutant mice lines were kindly provided by Dr. Noain Daniela’s group (Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich; n = 2, 8 months of age) and by Dr. Ruiqing Ni’s group (Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Zurich; n = 1, 8 months of age). Non-transgenic C57BL/6J male littermates (n = 3, 8 month old) were used as controls. All mice were housed under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark schedule and had free access to food and water. All animals were euthanized by pentobarbital injection. Skeletal muscles were dissected, snap frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80°C prior to western blot and biochemical analyses.
Differently, skeletal muscle lysates obtained from both wild-type and SOD1G93A transgenic mouse models of ALS were generously provided by Prof. Dr. Musarò, the Principal Investigator leading the neuromuscular research group at the Sapienza University of Rome. To provide a concise overview, wild-type C57BL/6 (WT) and transgenic SOD1G93A mice were utilized for our investigation. The mice were sacrificed at 130–140 days of age, a time point closely aligned with the spontaneous mortality of SOD1G93A mice. Euthanasia was conducted through cervical dislocation to ensure minimal suffering. Immediately following the humane sacrifice, muscle samples were excised for subsequent analysis, with one muscle specimen collected from each animal for testing purposes. Tissue lysates were prepared according to [65].
Preparation of RNA libraries for Mouse sequencing
RNA was extracted from snap-frozen organs by means of the RNeasy Plus Universal Kit (QIAGEN). The quantity and quality of RNA were analyzed with Qubit 1.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies), respectively. For library preparation, we used TruSeq RNA Sample Prep kit v2 (Illumina). We performed poly-A enrichment on 1 μg of total RNA per sample, which was then reverse transcribed into double-stranded cDNA followed by ligation of TruSeq adapters. Sequencing fragments containing TruSeq adapters at both termini were enriched by PCR. Quantity and quality of enriched libraries were analyzed using Qubit (1.0) Fluorometer and Caliper GX LabChip GX (Caliper Life Sciences), which showed a smear corresponding to a mean fragment size of around 260 bp. Libraries were then normalized to 10 nM in Tris-Cl 10 mM, pH 8.5, with 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20. Cluster generation was performed with the TruSeq PE Cluster kit v4-cBot-HS (Illumina), using 2 pM of pooled normalized libraries on the cBOT. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired-end at 2 × 126 bp using the TruSeq SBS kit v4-HS (Illumina).
Post-trascriptional changes analysis
Adenosine-to-inosine editing index (AEI) was calculated as previously published [33]. Herein, raw fastq reads were uniquely aligned to a murine mm10 reference genome using STAR v2.7.3 with the filter outFilterMultimapNmax = 1. RNAEditingIndexer (https://github.com/a2iEditing/RNAEditingIndexer) was used to calculate per-sample AEI.
We identified gene-specific RNA editing based on a recently published list of high-confidence targets of Adar [34] as follows. RediToolsKnown.py from REDItools [66] was applied on uniquely aligned samples as mentioned above. This yielded per-site lists of A-to-I editing on which we applied the following thresholds: (a) a minimum of 3 alternative reads per site per sample (b) a minimal editing frequency of 1% per site (c) criteria a) and b) are fulfilled in at least floor(2/3 * n) biological replicates, n is total number of biological replicates per group (d) transcripts of site present in at least 2 biological control replicates. Multiple testing of sites passing above-mentioned thresholds was performed using REDIT (https://github.com/gxiaolab/REDITs) and adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR) according to Benjamini-Hochberg, we considered sites with an FDR < 0.05 to be significantly edited.
For alternative splicing, SGSeq R package [67] was employed to find splicing events characterized by two or more splice variants. Exons and splice junction predictions were obtained from BAM filesPrediction of exons and spliced junctions was first made for each sample individually. Then the predictions for all samples were merged and we obtained a common set of transcript features. Overlapping exons were disjoint into non-overlapping exon bins and a genome-wide splice graph was compiled based on splice junctions and exon bins. A single value for each variant was produced by adding up the 5’ and 3’ counts, or, if these represented the same transcript features, by considering the unique value. These counts were then fed to DEXSeq [68]. We analyzed differential usage of variants across a single event, in-stead of quantifying differential usage of exons across a single gene. We retained only variants with at least five counts in at least three samples (of any condition). After filtering, the events associated with a single variant were discarded. Differential analysis was then performed implementing a sample+exon+condition:exon model in DEXSeq. Differentially expressed isoforms were defined as isoforms changing with FDR < 0.05. In the case of differentially used splice variants in muscle on 12 wpi, this dataset was considered as an outlier and hence excluded due to excessively reported splice variants (1,788 events compared to 5 or less on all other time-points and extraneural organs).
Patient samples
Human skeletal muscle samples of psoas major muscle were collected from patients with a clinical suspicion of Creutzfeldt-Jakob’s disease and submitted for an autopsy to the Swiss National Reference Center for Prion Disease between 2004–2011. A detailed description of samples used for RNA extraction and sequencing is given in S6 Table. Sporadic CJD was diagnosed according to criteria described previously [69].
Preparation of RNA libraries for sequencing of human tissues
Firstly, CJD bulk tissues were lysed in TE buffer with the anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and digested at 50°C with 2 mg / ml-1 Proteinase K (PK) for 2 hours to eliminate solids and release DNA/RNA from proteins. Although prions are well-known for their relative resistance to PK digestion, prion infectivity largely depends on PK-sensitive oligomers. Indeed, prolonged PK digestion reduces prion titers by a factor of >106, but residual PK-resistant material may still be infectious. In a second step, TRIzol reagent solution was added to the lysate (it contains Gdn-SCN and phenol, which inactivate RNases and disaggregate prions) and kept overnight at 4°C. Gdn-SCN is a chaotropic salt which rapidly denatures proteins and abolishes the infectivity of prion inoculum. At high concentrations, guanidine salts disaggregate PK-resistant PrPSc fibrils, eliminate PK resistance and abolish PrPSc conversion, meaning that any PK-resistant material that survived the digestion step would be expected to be inactivated at this stage of the protocol. 0.2 ml of ultrapure phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (Thermo Fischer Scientific) was added to the samples, followed by strong shaking and incubation at room temperature for 5 mins. Centrifugation step at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C generated two phases. The aqueous upper phase was transferred to a fresh tube; 0.5 ml of isopropanol and 1 μl of Glycoblue Coprecipitant (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added. Next, RNA was pelleted for 20 min at 12,000 x g at 4°C and washed twice with 75% ethanol. The RNA pellet was dissolved at 55°C in 20 μl of free nuclease water.
The quantity and quality of RNA were analyzed with Qubit 1.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and Tapestation 4200 (Agilent Technologies), respectively. The TruSeq stranded RNA protocol (Illumina) was employed for library preparation. In brief, 1 μg of total RNA per sample was poly-A enriched, reverse transcribed into double-stranded cDNA and then ligated with TruSeq adapters. PCR was performed to selectively enrich for fragments containing TruSeq adapters at both ends. The quantity and quality of enriched libraries were analyzed using Qubit (1.0) Fluorometer and Tapestation 4200. The resulting product is a smear with a mean fragment size of approximately 260 bp. Libraries were then normalized to 10 nM in Tris-Cl 10 mM, pH 8.5, with 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20. Cluster generation was performed with the TruSeq PE Cluster kit v4-cBot-HS (Illumina), using 2 pM of pooled normalized libraries on the cBOT. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired-end at 2 × 126 bp using the TruSeq SBS kit v4-HS (Illumina).
Despite profound RNA degradation, we speculated that moderate RNA degradation might preserve biological information. We then decided to set a RIN ≥ 3 as a minimal threshold for human muscle tissue. 12 out of 28 initially collected samples passed the RIN threshold (S4A Fig and S6 Table) and were further processed. 2 out of 12 samples were subsequently removed because of a high cluster condition variance (upon the quality control of the sequencing) resulting in a final sample size of n = 10 for downstream analysis.
Differential gene expression
We used FASTQC and parallel [70] algorithms for quality control of raw sequencing reads. We clipped low-quality ends as follows: 5’ = 3 bases, 3’ = 10 bases. Reads were aligned to mouse mm10 and human GRCh38.p13 reference genome, and transcriptome using STAR v2.3.0e_r291 [71] on cloud computing solution SUSHI of the Functional Genomics Center of Zurich [72]. DESeq2 [43] was used to detect differentially expressed genes based on the following thresholds: (a) |log2-fold change| > 0.5 (b) FDR < 0.05. Genes with less than 10 counts in total were excluded. Sex was included as a covariate in the formula for analyzing human samples with DESeq2. Gene ontology analysis was performed using clusterProfiler for R [73].
WGCNA
WGCNA was performed using the WGCNA R package [74]. Outlier genes were identified and removed using the goodSamplesGenes() function. Additionally, genes with fewer than 10 counts in over 50% of samples were filtered out. Raw count data was normalized using the variance stabilizing transformation provided by the DESeq2 R package. An adjacency matrix was generated using the adjacency() function with default parameters. To meet the criteria for a scale-free network, a soft threshold of 4 was uniformly applied to all networks. Adjacency matrix was transformed into a Topological Overlap Matrix (TOM). Average linkage hierarchical clustering was performed on a dissimilarity matrix (1 –TOM) and subsequently, modules of co-expressed genes were identified using the dynamic cut tree algorithm (cuttreeDynamic function()), with a minimum cluster size set to 30. Similar modules were merged based on their module eigengene (ME) correlation. To assess the significance of differences in ME values between tested conditions, a Mann-Whitney U test was conducted. To identify genes with the highest connectivity within modules, Module Membership (MM) was computed as the Pearson correlation coefficient (p-value) between individual gene expression levels and the ME. For genes in the modules of interest, we calculated a gene significance score based on the p-values calculated with DESeq2 for each timestage. Specifically we combined p-values for different time stages using the combineParallelPValues() function from the metapod R package with the method argument set to “stouffer” [75]. Negative log base 10 of the combined p-value represents the gene significance score. The preservation of mouse muscle co-expression network was tested using modulePreservation() function from the WGCNA package, using the network from the main cohort as a reference.
Prions detection in the spleen
50 mg of spleen tissue was homogenized in 500 μl lysis buffer (0.5% wt/vol sodium deoxycholate and 0.5% vol/vol Nonidet P-40 in PBS) at 5’000 rpm for 5 minutes by using a Precellys24 Sample Homogenizer (LABGENE Scientific SA, BER300P24) and incubated on ice for 20 minutes. The cleared lysates were obtained by centrifugation at 1‘000 rcf for 6 minutes in an Eppendorf 5417 R tabletop centrifuge. For PK-WB, the concentration of whole protein was determined using a BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). 100 μg of total protein was digested with 20 μg ml−1 proteinase K for 30 min at 37 °C, then mixed with western blotting loading buffer and boiled for 10 min at 95 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal antibody against vinculin (1,5000, Abcam, ab129002); mouse monoclonal antibody against PrP (POM1, 1:5,000, homemade) for prions detection; mouse monoclonal antibody against PrP (POM2, 1:5,000, homemade) for PrPC detection.
Prions detection with NaPTA protocol in the skeletal muscle
To detect prions in skeletal muscles, we performed sodium phosphotungstic acid (NaPTA) enrichment [42]. NaPTA binds and precipitates PrPSc in the presence of MgCl2, removing contaminants and concentrating PrPSc. For this protocol, 40 mg of tissue were lysed in 400 μl of 2% sarcosyl-PBS by using Precellys24 Sample Homogenizer (LABGENE Scientific SA, BER300P24) twice, at 5‘000 rpm for 5 minutes. To remove gross debris, samples were centrifuged at 80g for 1 minute. Samples were next incubated at 37°C while shaking at 1500 rpm for 30 minutes. Next, 50U/ml of benzonase (to degrade DNA contaminants) and 1mM of MgCl2 were added and incubated at 37°C while shaking at 1500 rpm for 30 minutes. Then, 4% NaPTA and 130 mM MgCl2 were added, resulting in a final NaPTA concentration of 0.3%. The samples were incubated at 37°C while shaking at 1500 rpm for 30 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 16,000 g for 45 minutes to precipitate PrPSc. The resulting pellets were resuspended in 30 μl of 0.1% sarcosyl. 20 μl were next used for the PK-WB and digested with 20 μg ml−1 proteinase K for 1 hour at 37 °C. The enzymatic reaction was blocked by stop-buffer (1% (w/v) SDS; 25 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4; 2,5% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol; 1.5% (w/v) sucrose; 0.02% (w/v) brome-phenol-blue). At this point, samples were boiled for 10 min prior to Western blot analysis. NBH and RML6 brain tissue underwent the same NaPTA procedure and used as negative and positive controls. Mouse monoclonal antibody against PrP (POM1, 1:5,000, homemade) was used for prions detection.
Western blot analysis
To prepare the samples, 1 ml of cell-lysis buffer (20 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% IGEPAL) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche 11873580001) was added to the lysed samples. They were then homogenized twice at 5’000 rpm for 15 seconds using a Precellys24 Sample Homogenizer (LABGENE Scientific SA, BER300P24) and incubated on ice for 20 minutes. The cleared lysates were obtained by centrifugation at 2’000 rcf, 4° C for 10 minutes in an Eppendorf 5417 R tabletop centrifuge. The concentration of whole protein was determined using a BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). The samples were boiled in 4 x LDS (Invitrogen) containing 10 mM DTT at 95°C for 5 minutes. 15 μg of total protein per sample were loaded onto a 4–12% Novex Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen) gradient for electrophoresis at 80 V for 15 minutes, followed by constant voltage of 150 V. The PVDF or Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with 5% Sureblock (LubioScience) in PBS-T (PBS + 0.2% Tween-20) for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were then cut into three parts according to the molecular weight. The membrane was divided into three segments for targeted antibody incubation: The upper portion was treated with anti-Vinculin (1:5000, Abcam, ab129002), the middle section with anti-Glutaminase (1:3000, Abcam, ab202027), and the lower segment with anti-Glutamine synthetase (1,2000, Abcam, ab176562). This antibody incubation was carried out in PBS-T supplemented with 1% Sureblock, and the membranes were left overnight at 4°C to facilitate optimal binding. They were washed thrice with PBS-T for 10 minutes. The membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP-tagged goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), 1:3000, 111.035.045, Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 1 hour at room temperature. The membranes were washed thrice with PBS-T for 10 minutes and developed using a Classico chemiluminescence substrate system (Millipore). The signal was detected using a LAS-3000 Luminescent Image Analyzer (Fujifilm) and analyzed with ImageJ software.
RT-QuiC protocol
RT-QuIC assays were conducted as previously described [76]. In brief, 10% wt/vol spleen homogenates (0.5% wt/vol sodium deoxycholate and 0.5% vol/vol Nonidet P-40 in PBS) were diluted 2000-fold and used as seeds for the RT-QuIC reactions. For skeletal muscle analysis, 2 μl of the NaPTA prion precipitation product from a 10% wt/vol sample, resuspended in 30 μl of 0.1% sarcosyl-PBS, were used. Recombinant hamster PrP (HaPrP) served as the monomeric substrate for RT-QuIC conversion. The reactions contained HaPrP substrate protein at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/ml in PBS (pH 7.4), 170 mM NaCl, 10 μM EDTA, and 10 μM Thioflavin T, with 2 μl of diluted brain homogenates added to a total volume of 100 μl. NBH and RMl6 brain homogenates were used as negative and positive, respectively.
The RT-QuIC reactions consisted of 100 hours with intermittent shaking cycles set at 42°C: 90 seconds of shaking at 900 rpm in double orbital mode, followed by 30 seconds of rest, using a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech). Thioflavin T fluorescence was measured every 15 minutes to monitor aggregate formation (450 nm excitation, 480 nm emission; bottom read mode).
Biochemical analysis
The concentration of glutamine and glutamate in skeletal muscle was measured using the Merck Glutamine Assay Kit (Catalog Number MAK438). To prepare the lysates, a total of 600 μg of total protein was utilized. In each standard and sample well, 80 μL of working reagent was added to determine the glutamine concentration. To measure glutamate concentration, samples were also prepared with 80 μL of blank working reagent. The 96-well plate was incubated at 37°C for 40 minutes. Absorbance values were recorded at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The concentrations of glutamine and glutamate were determined by comparing the absorbance of the samples to a standard curve generated from known concentrations of glutamine and glutamate. The results were expressed as μM/ml.
Statistical analysis
For Fig 3E, normalized raw counts for the GLUL gene in control and sCJD patients were analyzed using the DESeq2 package, with related false discovery rate (FDR) calculations. In Fig 3G, Western blot densitometry data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, resulting in a p-value of 0.01072. For statistical analyses in Fig 4A, Mann-Whitney U test was used. In Figs 4C, S8B, S8C and S8E), we applied the t-test (as the standard deviations were consistent) with Bonferroni correction to account for multiple comparisons. In S9 Fig, the Mann-Whitney U test was used due to its non-parametric nature, which is suitable for data that do not assume a normal distribution.
The choice of DESeq2 for RNA-seq data, Mann-Whitney U for non-normally distributed data, and t-tests with Bonferroni correction for normally distributed data ensures that our analyses are appropriately tailored to the characteristics of the data, providing reliable and valid results.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Martina Cerisoli, Nicola Conneely, Andrea Armani, Marigona Imeri, and Mirzet Delic for support, assistance in laboratory investigations and animal husbandry, and also Med. Dr. Regina Reimann for providing sCJD skeletal muscles biopsies. The authors acknowledge the Functional Genomics Center Zurich of the ETH Zurich, and Next Generation Sequencing Platform of University of Bern for preparing sequencing libraries, RNA sequencing, quality control and technical support of mouse and human studies, Prof. Eli Eisenberg (Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel) for help with RNA editing analyses. The authors extend their gratitude to Prof. Musarò Dr. Gabriella Dorbowolny and Dr. Gaia Laurenzi (La Sapienza University), for providing SOD1G93A muscle lysates. Appreciation is also extended to Dr. Daniela Noain, Ines Antunes dos Santos Dias and Irena Barbaric (Department of Neurology, University of Zurich) for their kind contribution of DLB hindlimb skeletal muscles and Dr. Ruiqing Ni’s group and Benjamin Francois Combes (Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich) for providing DLB hindlimb skeletal muscles. We acknowledge the Tissu-Tumorotheque Est (CRB HCL, HCL’s biobank) for providing the human biological samples (AD, DLB, ALS, FTD) used in this study.
Data Availability
Raw sequencing data as well as processed data from this manuscript is available freely via GEO accession number GSE210128. Code to reproduce results generated in this manuscript are available at https://github.com/marusakod/RML_extraneural_organs. A searchable database of gene expression profiles from brain and extraneural organs available for visualization and download at https://fgcz-shiny.uzh.ch/priontranscriptomics/.
Funding Statement
A.A. is supported by institutional core funding by the University of Zurich and the University Hospital of Zurich, a Distinguished Scientist Award of the NOMIS Foundation, an Advanced Grant of the European Research Council (ERC Prion2020 grant ID 278611) and grants from the GELU Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF grant ID 179040 and grant ID 207872, Sinergia grant ID 183563), and the Human Frontiers Science Program (grant ID RGP0001/2022). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Aguzzi A, Falsig J. Prion propagation, toxicity and degradation. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(7):936–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tabula Muris C, Overall c, Logistical c, Organ c, processing, Library p, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature. 2018;562(7727):367–72. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wulf MA, Senatore A, Aguzzi A. The biological function of the cellular prion protein: an update. BMC Biol. 2017;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0375-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klein MA, Frigg R, Flechsig E, Raeber AJ, Kalinke U, Bluethmann H, et al. A crucial role for B cells in neuroinvasive scrapie. Nature. 1997;390(6661):687–90. doi: 10.1038/37789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mabbott NA, Mackay F, Minns F, Bruce ME. Temporary inactivation of follicular dendritic cells delays neuroinvasion of scrapie. Nature medicine. 2000;6(7):719–20. doi: 10.1038/77401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi S, Mitteregger-Kretzschmar G, Giese A, Kretzschmar HA. Establishing quantitative real-time quaking-induced conversion (qRT-QuIC) for highly sensitive detection and quantification of PrPSc in prion-infected tissues. Acta Neuropathologica Communications. 2013;1(1):44. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-1-44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Béringue V, Tixador P, Andréoletti O, Reine F, Castille J, Laï TL, et al. Host prion protein expression levels impact prion tropism for the spleen. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(7):e1008283. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen B, Soto C, Morales R. Peripherally administrated prions reach the brain at sub-infectious quantities in experimental hamsters. FEBS Letters. 2014;588(5):795–800. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fischer MB, Roeckl C, Parizek P, Schwarz HP, Aguzzi A. Binding of disease-associated prion protein to plasminogen. Nature. 2000;408(6811):479–83. doi: 10.1038/35044100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Houston F, Foster JD, Chong A, Hunter N, Bostock CJ. Transmission of BSE by blood transfusion in sheep. Lancet. 2000;356(9234):999–1000. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02719-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Salamat MKF, Blanco ARA, McCutcheon S, Tan KB, Stewart P, Brown H, et al. Preclinical transmission of prions by blood transfusion is influenced by donor genotype and route of infection. PLoS pathogens. 2021;17(2):e1009276. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Concha-Marambio L, Chacon MA, Soto C. Preclinical Detection of Prions in Blood of Nonhuman Primates Infected with Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(1):34–43. doi: 10.3201/eid2601.181423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Concha-Marambio L, Pritzkow S, Moda F, Tagliavini F, Ironside JW, Schulz PE, et al. Detection of prions in blood from patients with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Science translational medicine. 2016;8(370):370ra183. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moda F, Gambetti P, Notari S, Concha-Marambio L, Catania M, Park K-W, et al. Prions in the Urine of Patients with Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(6):530–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bougard D, Brandel J-P, Bélondrade M, Béringue V, Segarra C, Fleury H, et al. Detection of prions in the plasma of presymptomatic and symptomatic patients with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Science translational medicine. 2016;8(370):370ra182-370ra182. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Llewelyn CA, Hewitt PE, Knight RS, Amar K, Cousens S, Mackenzie J, et al. Possible transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Lancet. 2004;363(9407):417–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15486-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prusiner SB. Prion biology and diseases1999. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stärk KDC, Regula G, Hernandez J, Knopf L, Fuchs K, Morris RS, et al. Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peden AH, Ritchie DL, Head MW, Ironside JW. Detection and localization of PrPSc in the skeletal muscle of patients with variant, latrogenic, and sporadic forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. American Journal of Pathology. 2006;168(3):927–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Neumann M, Krasemann S, Schröck K, Steinbach K, Glatzel M. Myositis facilitates preclinical accumulation of pathological prion protein in muscle. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1(1):78. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-1-78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Herzog C, Rivière J, Lescoutra-Etchegaray N, Charbonnier A, Leblanc V, Salès N, et al. PrPTSE Distribution in a Primate Model of Variant, Sporadic, and Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Journal of virology. 2005;79(22):14339–45. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.22.14339-14345.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morris JK, McCoin CS, Fuller KN, John CS, Wilkins HM, Green ZD, et al. Mild Cognitive Impairment and Donepezil Impact Mitochondrial Respiratory Capacity in Skeletal Muscle. Function (Oxf). 2021;2(6):zqab045. doi: 10.1093/function/zqab045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brisendine MH, Nichenko AS, Bandara AB, Willoughby OS, Amiri N, Weingrad Z, et al. Neuromuscular Dysfunction Precedes Cognitive Impairment in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Function (Oxf). 2024;5(1):zqad066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jaiswal V, Park M, Lee HJ. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of the Expression of Antioxidant and Immunity Genes in the Spleen of a Cyanidin 3-O-Glucoside-Treated Alzheimer’s Mouse Model. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(9). doi: 10.3390/antiox10091435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shamir R, Klein C, Amar D, Vollstedt E-J, Bonin M, Usenovic M, et al. Analysis of blood-based gene expression in idiopathic Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017;89(16):1676–83. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Craig DW, Hutchins E, Violich I, Alsop E, Gibbs JR, Levy S, et al. RNA sequencing of whole blood reveals early alterations in immune cells and gene expression in Parkinson’s disease. Nature Aging. 2021;1(8):734–47. doi: 10.1038/s43587-021-00088-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lavin KM, Sealfon SC, McDonald MN, Roberts BM, Wilk K, Nair VD, et al. Skeletal muscle transcriptional networks linked to type I myofiber grouping in Parkinson’s disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020;128(2):229–40. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00702.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pradat P-F, Dubourg O, de Tapia M, di Scala F, Dupuis L, Lenglet T, et al. Muscle Gene Expression Is a Marker of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Severity. Neurodegenerative Diseases. 2011;9(1):38–52. doi: 10.1159/000329723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aguzzi A, Nuvolone M, Zhu C. The immunobiology of prion diseases. Nature reviews Immunology. 2013;13(12):888–902. doi: 10.1038/nri3553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Halliez S, Reine F, Herzog L, Jaumain E, Haïk S, Rezaei H, et al. Accelerated, Spleen-Based Titration of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Infectivity in Transgenic Mice Expressing Human Prion Protein with Sensitivity Comparable to That of Survival Time Bioassay. Journal of virology. 2014;88(15):8678–86. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01118-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sorce S, Nuvolone M, Russo G, Chincisan A, Heinzer D, Avar M, et al. Genome-wide transcriptomics identifies an early preclinical signature of prion infection. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(6):e1008653. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaczmarczyk L, Schleif M, Dittrich L, Williams RH, Koderman M, Bansal V, et al. Distinct translatome changes in specific neural populations precede electroencephalographic changes in prion-infected mice. PLOS Pathogens. 2022;18(8):e1010747. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roth SH, Levanon EY, Eisenberg E. Genome-wide quantification of ADAR adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing activity. Nature methods. 2019;16(11):1131–8. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0610-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gabay O, Shoshan Y, Kopel E, Ben-Zvi U, Mann TD, Bressler N, et al. Landscape of adenosine-to-inosine RNA recoding across human tissues. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28841-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Scotti MM, Swanson MS. RNA mis-splicing in disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(1):19–32. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Foutz A, Appleby BS, Hamlin C, Liu X, Yang S, Cohen Y, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of human prion detection in cerebrospinal fluid. Annals of neurology. 2017;81(1):79–92. doi: 10.1002/ana.24833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cramm M, Schmitz M, Karch A, Mitrova E, Kuhn F, Schroeder B, et al. Stability and reproducibility underscore utility of RT-QuIC for diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Molecular neurobiology. 2016;53:1896–904. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9133-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brown KL, Stewart K, Ritchie DL, Mabbott NA, Williams A, Fraser H, et al. Scrapie replication in lymphoid tissues depends on prion protein-expressing follicular dendritic cells. Nature medicine. 1999;5(11):1308–12. doi: 10.1038/15264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mabbott NA, Williams A, Farquhar CF, Pasparakis M, Kollias G, Bruce ME. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-deficient, but not interleukin-6-deficient, mice resist peripheral infection with scrapie. Journal of virology. 2000;74(7):3338–44. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.7.3338-3344.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Glatzel M, Abela E, Maissen M, Aguzzi A. Extraneural pathologic prion protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349(19):1812–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wells GA, Hawkins SA, Green RB, Austin AR, Dexter I, Spencer YI, et al. Preliminary observations on the pathogenesis of experimental bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE): an update. The Veterinary record. 1998;142(5):103–6. doi: 10.1136/vr.142.5.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wilham JM, Orrú CD, Bessen RA, Atarashi R, Sano K, Race B, et al. Rapid end-point quantitation of prion seeding activity with sensitivity comparable to bioassays. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(12):e1001217. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aguzzi A, Heikenwalder M, Polymenidou M. Insights into prion strains and neurotoxicity. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8(7):552–61. doi: 10.1038/nrm2204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aucouturier P, Carnaud C. The immune system and prion diseases: a relationship of complicity and blindness. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2002;72(6):1075–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Krautler NJ, Kana V, Kranich J, Tian Y, Perera D, Lemm D, et al. Follicular dendritic cells emerge from ubiquitous perivascular precursors. Cell. 2012;150(1):194–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blättler T, Brandner S, Raeber AJ, Klein MA, Voigtländer T, Weissmann C, et al. PrP-expressing tissue required for transfer of scrapie infectivity from spleen to brain. Nature. 1997;389(6646):69–73. doi: 10.1038/37981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kranich J, Krautler NJ, Heinen E, Polymenidou M, Bridel C, Schildknecht A, et al. Follicular dendritic cells control engulfment of apoptotic bodies by secreting Mfge8. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2008;205(6):1293–302. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Prinz M, Montrasio F, Klein MA, Schwarz P, Priller J, Odermatt B, et al. Lymph nodal prion replication and neuroinvasion in mice devoid of follicular dendritic cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(2):919–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022626399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Montrasio F, Frigg R, Glatzel M, Klein MA, Mackay F, Aguzzi A, et al. Impaired prion replication in spleens of mice lacking functional follicular dendritic cells. Science. 2000;288(5469):1257–9. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5469.1257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aucouturier P, Carp RI, Carnaud C, Wisniewski T. Prion diseases and the immune system. Clinical Immunology. 2000;96(2):79–85. doi: 10.1006/clim.2000.4875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gardiner A, Marucci A. Immunological responsiveness of scrapie infected mice. Journal of comparative pathology. 1969;79(2):233–5. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(69)90010-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kingsbury DT, Smeltzer DA, Gibbs CJ Jr, Gajdusek DC. Evidence for normal cell-mediated immunity in scrapie-infected mice. Infection and immunity. 1981;32(3):1176–80. doi: 10.1128/iai.32.3.1176-1180.1981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kanata E, Llorens F, Dafou D, Dimitriadis A, Thune K, Xanthopoulos K, et al. RNA editing alterations define manifestation of prion diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(39):19727–35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803521116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Skinner PJ, Kim HO, Bryant D, Kinzel NJ, Reilly C, Priola SA, et al. Treatment of Prion Disease with Heterologous Prion Proteins. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0131993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bradley SJ, Bourgognon J-M, Sanger HE, Verity N, Mogg AJ, White DJ, et al. M1 muscarinic allosteric modulators slow prion neurodegeneration and restore memory loss. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2017;127(2):487–99. doi: 10.1172/JCI87526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bender H, Noyes N, Annis JL, Hitpas A, Mollnow L, Croak K, et al. PrPC knockdown by liposome-siRNA-peptide complexes (LSPCs) prolongs survival and normal behavior of prion-infected mice immunotolerant to treatment. PloS one. 2019;14(7):e0219995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Perlman RL. Mouse models of human disease: An evolutionary perspective. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health. 2016;2016(1):170–6. doi: 10.1093/emph/eow014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Scholes AN, Lewis JA. Comparison of RNA isolation methods on RNA-Seq: implications for differential expression and meta-analyses. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6673-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Terry EE, Zhang X, Hoffmann C, Hughes LD, Lewis SA, Li J, et al. Transcriptional profiling reveals extraordinary diversity among skeletal muscle tissues. eLife. 2018;7:e34613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Swearengen JR. Choosing the right animal model for infectious disease research. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine. 2018;1(2):100–8. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dimitriadis A, Zhang F, Murphy T, Trainer T, Jaunmuktane Z, Schmidt C, et al. Single-nuclei transcriptomics of mammalian prion diseases identifies dynamic gene signatures shared between species. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.09.13.507650. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bourgognon J-M, Spiers JG, Scheiblich H, Antonov A, Bradley SJ, Tobin AB, et al. Alterations in neuronal metabolism contribute to the pathogenesis of prion disease. Cell Death & Differentiation. 2018;25(8):1408–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huang Y-F, Wang Y, Watford M. Glutamine Directly Downregulates Glutamine Synthetase Protein Levels in Mouse C2C12 Skeletal Muscle Myotubes12. The Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137(6):1357–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dobrowolny G, Martini M, Scicchitano BM, Romanello V, Boncompagni S, Nicoletti C, et al. Muscle Expression of SOD1G93A Triggers the Dismantlement of Neuromuscular Junction via PKC-Theta. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2017;28(12):1105–19. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Picardi E, Pesole G. REDItools: high-throughput RNA editing detection made easy. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(14):1813–4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Goldstein LD, Cao Y, Pau G, Lawrence M, Wu TD, Seshagiri S, et al. Prediction and Quantification of Splice Events from RNA-Seq Data. PloS one. 2016;11(5):e0156132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Anders S, Reyes A, Huber W. Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data. Genome Res. 2012;22(10):2008–17. doi: 10.1101/gr.133744.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hill AF, Joiner S, Wadsworth JDF, Sidle KCL, Bell JE, Budka H, et al. Molecular classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2003;126:1333–46. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tange O. GNU Parallel 2018. https://doiorg/105281/zenodo1146014. 2018.
- 71.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hatakeyama M, Opitz L, Russo G, Qi WH, Schlapbach R, Rehrauer H. SUSHI: an exquisite recipe for fully documented, reproducible and reusable NGS data analysis. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2016;17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yu GC, Wang LG, Han YY, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. Omics. 2012;16(5):284–7. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lun A. metapod: Meta-Analyses on P-Values of Differential Analyses. R package version 140. 2022.
- 76.Pfammatter M, Andreasen M, Meisl G, Taylor CG, Adamcik J, Bolisetty S, et al. Absolute quantification of amyloid propagons by digital microfluidics. Analytical chemistry. 2017;89(22):12306–13. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]