Abstract
Cognitive dysfunctions are core-enduring symptoms of schizophrenia, with important sex-related differences. Genetic variants of the DTBPN1 gene associated with reduced dysbindin-1 protein (Dys) expression negatively impact cognitive functions in schizophrenia through a functional epistatic interaction with Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Dys is involved in the trafficking of dopaminergic receptors, crucial for prefrontal cortex (PFC) signaling regulation. Moreover, dopamine signaling is modulated by estrogens via inhibition of COMT expression. We hypothesized a sex dimorphism in Dys-related cognitive functions dependent on COMT and estrogen levels. Our multidisciplinary approach combined behavioral-molecular findings on genetically modified mice, human postmortem Dys expression data, and in vivo fMRI during a working memory task performance. We found cognitive impairments in male mice related to genetic variants characterized by reduced Dys protein expression (pBonferroni = 0.0001), as well as in male humans through a COMT/Dys functional epistatic interaction involving PFC brain activity during working memory (t(23) = −3.21; pFDR = 0.004). Dorsolateral PFC activity was associated with lower working memory performance in males only (p = 0.04). Also, male humans showed decreased Dys expression in dorsolateral PFC during adulthood (pFDR = 0.05). Female Dys mice showed preserved cognitive performances with deficits only with a lack of estrogen tested in an ovariectomy model (pBonferroni = 0.0001), suggesting that genetic variants reducing Dys protein expression could probably become functional in females when the protective effect of estrogens is attenuated, i.e., during menopause. Overall, our results show the differential impact of functional variants of the DTBPN1 gene interacting with COMT on cognitive functions across sexes in mice and humans, underlying the importance of considering sex as a target for patient stratification and precision medicine in schizophrenia.
Subject terms: Schizophrenia, Neuroscience
Introduction
The incidence, age of onset, symptoms, and response to treatment in psychiatric disorders can vary significantly between sexes [1]. However, many clinical and preclinical investigations do not include sex as a biological component in the experimental design. For this reason, the US - National Institute of Health published a policy in 2015 encouraging the inclusion of females in both clinical and basic research, with the ultimate goal of harmonizing results of human and preclinical research and, ultimately, providing new insights on the etiology and treatment of mental disorders in an era of more sex-tailored medicine [2]. Of relevance to the study of psychiatric disorders, sex differences in relationship with clinical symptoms, course, and treatment outcome have been consistently reported in schizophrenia [3]. Male patients show an earlier age of onset, a higher propensity to negative symptoms, lower social functioning, and more frequent co-morbid substance abuse than females. Female patients show a relatively later onset with more affective symptoms. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that estrogens may protect against schizophrenia throughout life [4, 5]. Cognitive dysfunctions are core-enduring symptoms in schizophrenia that contribute dramatically to poor functional outcomes in patients and constitute an unmet therapeutic need [6]. Also, for cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, a greater cognitive impairment spanning several cognitive domains, including working memory, has been reported in male relative to female patients [7]. Inter-individual differences in cognitive abilities in normal individuals and patients with schizophrenia have been associated with variations in the DTNBP1 gene, encoding dysbindin-1 protein (Dys), which is involved in schizophrenia neuropathology and cognitive function during treatment with antipsychotic drugs [8–10]. More specifically, Dys plays a role in the regulation of brain development [11, 12] influencing synapse formation and maintenance, dopamine D2-like intracellular receptor trafficking [9, 13–15] and neurotransmitter release [14, 16–18]. Dys functions differ between sexes [19]. Reduced expression levels of Dys mRNA and protein in brain areas relevant to schizophrenia, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the hippocampus, and the nucleus accumbens, have been reported in patients [14, 20]. In PFC, Dys contributes to the pattern of excitability in PFC microcircuits [21] through a functional epistatic effect with Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) [22], an enzyme that is involved in metabolizing various catecholamine neurotransmitters, including dopamine. Lower COMT activity combined with lower DTNBP1 expression is associated with poorer performance in mice and lower PFC efficiency measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the performance of a working memory task in humans, compared with carriers of a single genetic variation either in COMT or DTNBP1 genes. These mechanisms have been associated with the genetic risk for schizophrenia, particularly, with impaired working memory [15, 23], and altered cognitive responses to antipsychotic drugs [9, 15, 24]. Estrogens have been proposed as mediating factors of the relationship between sex and cognition and antipsychotic treatment response via dopamine signaling modulation [25, 26]. Estrogens can control COMT activity [27, 28] through estrogen response elements (ERE) sequences that are present in the promoter of the COMT gene [29] and inhibit its transcription [30, 31]. Indeed, estrogen deprivation can result in increased COMT activity and decreased dopaminergic functioning, lowering the sensitivity of dopamine D2 receptors and, as a result, lowering the efficacy of (D2-receptor binding) antipsychotics [32, 33]. Moreover, ERR1 (estrogen-related receptor 1; coded by the ESRRA gene) has been associated with the modulation of the expression of genes co-expressed with DRD2 in the human dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) [34]. Genetic variants within this co-expressed gene set are associated with neuroimaging, behavioral and clinical phenotypes associated with schizophrenia [35]. Although no direct interaction between estrogens and Dysbindin has been shown from a molecular point of view, the effects of estrogen on dopamine signaling [36] and the role of COMT and Dys and their functional epistatic interaction in the modulation of prefrontal cognitive functions in both humans and mice [22] are strongly suggestive of a pathway of convergence of COMT, Dys, and estrogens that can mediate sex differences in cognition. Analyzing the combined effect of the sex dimorphism of Dys on prefrontal working memory through the interaction with COMT during estrogenic periods during lifespan may reveal schizophrenia-related pathophysiological processes trackable across age stages and sexes.
To test this hypothesis, we evaluated sex-driven differences in behavioral phenotypes in Dys-related cognitive domains using a murine genetic model carrying Dys hemideletion (Dys + /+; Dys + /− male and female mice). To understand possible mechanisms of sexual dimorphism in dysbindin-related cognitive dysfunctions, we investigated the role of COMT in Dys mice since its activity depends on estrogen levels [25, 26]. We tested the functional epistatic interaction between the DTNBP1 haplotype (Dys Hap) previously associated with reduced Dys mRNA expression in the human brain [22], i.e., the three-marker rs2619538-rs3213207-rs1047631, and the COMT common variant rs4680 that has been associated with working memory efficiency [22]. In particular, we evaluated the COMT immunoblotting levels in the medial PFC (mPFC) of Dys mice. Based on mice results, we assessed sex differences in Dys gene expression throughout life in humans using the analysis of human RNA sequencing data from the Lieber Institute for Brain Development (LIBD) Brain Repository to test differential mRNA expression across age stages and sexes in several brain regions. Lastly, as the DLPFC is a brain region with similar cognitive functions and connections to murine mPFC [37], we analyzed the effects of Dys Hap/COMT on the activity of DLPFC during the performance of a working memory task in humans using fMRI, hypothesizing a matching sex dimorphism in brain cognitive functioning between mice and humans.
Methods
Mice models
Mice
Experiments were carried out in 3 to 6-month-old female and male Dys heterozygous mutant mice [38, 39] (Dys + /− female n = 75, male n = 28) and their wild-type littermates (Dys + /+ female n = 80, male n = 35). Mice were housed in 2–4 per cage in a room with controlled temperature (21 ± 1 °C) and humidity (55 ± 10%) with a 12 h light/dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum. For details, see the Supplementary Information, Section 1.
Estrous cycle phases identification
Stages of the estrus cycle were identified by cytological analysis of vaginal secretion, as previously described [40–42]. For details, see the Supplementary Information, Section 1.2.
Surgery
Female Dys + /− and Dys + /+ mice were ovariectomized under isoflurane anesthesia, as previously described [43, 44]. The ovaries were removed through a bilateral incision at the flank level. Control Dys + /− and Dys + /+ female mice were anesthetized and subjected to sham surgery, consisting of a bilateral incision without removing ovaries. The animals were housed individually for 24 h to fully recover from surgery. One week after surgery, vaginal cytological samples were taken to verify the loss of ovarian function. Mice were randomly assigned to ovariectomy or Sham surgery.
Drugs
Chronic peroral administration of 17ß-estradiol (E2) administration (Sigma-Aldrich, US) was carried out as described elsewhere [45, 46]. For details, see the Supplementary Information, Section 1.1.
Behavioral test: temporal order recognition (TOR) Test
The TOR test was performed as previously described in [15, 47]. For details, see the Supplementary Information, Section 1.3.
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was carried out on proteins extracted from isolated mPFC brain area. For details, see the Supplementary Information Section 1.4.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses in mice were performed using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, Version 9.1.1, La Jolla, CA, USA). For details, see the Supplementary Information Section 1.6.
Humans
Brain postmortem study
Brain tissue data were collected at the LIBD [48, 49]. All individuals had minimal age-associated neuropathology, no substance use, and no psychiatric or neurological disorders, determined by postmortem histopathological examination, toxicology, and clinical histories, respectively. All individuals were of European or African American ancestry. We selected individual samples with the RNA Integrity Number ≥6, i.e., the optimal range for gene expression data [50]. DTNBP1 is expressed in the DLPFC, hippocampus, caudate, putamen, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, thalamus, and midbrain of the adult human brain [51]. Thus, we first quantified the gene expression from postmortem samples extracted from the DLPFC, the hippocampus, and the caudate nucleus of both males and females available in the LIBD repository. Our investigation of sex differences in Dys gene expression included 261 (33% female), 276 (33% female), and 259 (31% female) samples for the analysis of the DLPFC, hippocampus, and caudate, respectively (Table 1) [48].
Table 1.
Sample size – mean age in years ± SD (age range min:max) - %female | |||
---|---|---|---|
DLPFC | Hippocampus | Caudate | |
Perinatal | 49–0.5 ± 1.5 (−0.5:5.3) –47% | 42–0.02 ± 1.2 (−0.5:4.7) –52% | 20–1.0 ± 1.4 (0:4.2) –35% |
Juvenile | 45–18.5 ± 13.5 (6.3:24.8) –27% | 47–18.6 ± 3.6 (8.2:24.8) –23% | 29–19.8 ± 3.6 (13:24.8) –35% |
Younger adults | 88–40.4 ± 7.2 (25.8:49.7) –30% | 104–40.0 ± 7.4 (25:49.7) –31% | 103–40.5 ± 7.3 (25:50) –29% |
Older adults | 79–59.0 ± 7.6 (50.3-84.2) –29% | 83–58.9 ± 8.2 (50.1:84.2) –27% | 107–61.8 ± 10.1 (50.3:89.9) –28% |
DLPFC Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, SD Standard deviation.
We derived DLPFC samples from Brodmann Area 46; the hippocampus samples from the hippocampus proper, including the dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2, CA1, and the subicular complex [50, 52]. As regards the caudate nucleus, we consider the anterior ‘head’ portion, the caudate portion most closely connected to the prefrontal cortex. For all tissues, RNA sequencing was performed via the Illumina Ribozero Kit. Age differences across brain regions were assessed using the Chi-square independence test (α < 0.05). Regional co-expression quantification and genotyping follow standard procedures [48] and are described in Supplementary Information, Section 2.1. We tested sex differences in DTNBP1 expression in the hippocampus, DLPFC, and caudate through two-sample t tests applying the False discovery rate (FDR) correction to control for multiple comparisons (k = 3 regions of interest). We stratified the analysis into four age groups, i.e., perinatal (1–6 years), juvenile (12–25 years), young adults (25.1-50 years), and older adults (50.1–90 years) to account for regional specificity of DTNBP1 expression across age groups. while interaction between sex and the COMT rs4680 genotype on DTNBP1 expression using 2way-ANOVAs. Statistical analyses were performed through R (https://www.r-project.org), version 4.1.2.
Brain imaging study
Two hundred and seven healthy adults of non-related European ancestry participated in an fMRI study at the University of Bari Aldo Moro (Male: N = 105; mean age in years±standard deviation=27.1 ± 6.9; Female: N = 102; mean age in years ± standard deviation=25.3 ± 5.8). For each participant, we assessed intelligence quotient (IQ) using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale — revised [53] (Male: mean IQ scores±standard deviation=112.5 ± 11.7; Female: mean IQ scores±standard deviation=105.2 ± 10.5). Age and IQ differences between the sex groups were tested using the two-sample t-test (α < 0.05). The experimental protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained after a full understanding of the protocol according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Inclusion/exclusion criteria are described in the Supplementary Information, Section 2.2.
Genotype determination
Participants underwent blood withdrawal for subsequent DNA extraction from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Details on genotype extraction and processing are reported in Supplementary Information, Section 2.3. To test the Dys Hap/COMT interaction on fMRI, we selected the single nucleotide polymorphisms in COMT and the Dys Hap based on previous literature [54]. The COMT Val158Met, rs4680, was not available in our sample; therefore, we selected a single nucleotide polymorphism in linkage disequilibrium named rs4633 (D’ = 0.996, R2 = 0.988), a synonymous variant at codon 62 of the COMT gene. We will refer hereinafter to the carriers of the Met allele as COMTMetCar compared to COMTVal/Val individuals. COMTMet/Met and COMTVal/Met were grouped because of the small sample size of each group. Regarding the three-marker Dys Hap (rs2619538-rs3213207-rs1047631) at the DTNBP1 gene locus previously associated with a pattern of cognitive-related DLPFC functional activity consistent with reduced expression [9, 22], the single nucleotide polymorphism in linkage disequilibrium rs9296989 replaced rs2619538 (D’ = 0.96, R2 = 0.84). We will refer hereinafter to the carriers of Dys Hap (G-T-T) as Dys Hap + /− in comparison to Dys Hap + /+ individuals. Dys Hap + /− and Dys Hap − /− were grouped due to the small sample size of each group.
The N-back task
All participants underwent an fMRI experiment completing a blocked paradigm of a previously published working memory task, the N-back task [55, 56]. Further details about the neuropsychological paradigm are reported in Supplementary Information, Section 2.4. To determine behavioral performance, we computed an efficiency rate as the ratio between the hit rate and reaction time [57]. Higher values of this index indicated better behavioral performance [58]. Behavioral differences across sexes in terms of hit rate, reaction time, and efficiency between sex groups were tested through two-sample t-tests (α < 0.05).
MRI data acquisition and processing
fMRI scans along with a structural T1-weighted scan were acquired with a General Electric (Milwaukee, WI) 3.0 Tesla whole-body scanner using a standard quadrature head coil and processed with the Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT12, http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/) and the Statistical Parametric Mapping version 12 (SPM12, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) implemented in MATLAB R2017a (https://it.mathworks.com/). Acquisition parameters, individual-level data processing, and quality check procedures are provided in Supplementary Information, Section 2.5.
To detect significant brain activity at the group-level, we performed a three-way voxel-wise ANOVA in SPM12 on individual-level activity maps during the N-back task. The model included main effects along with two-way and three-way interactions between sex, COMT genotype, and Dys Hap. We report results masked by N-back task activity within the grey matter and thresholded at whole-brain level using the threshold-free cluster enhancement [6] (TFCE). Statistics were adjusted for multiple comparisons as the number of voxels based on the Family-Wise error rate (pTFCE-FWE < 0.05). Additional control analyses on the impact of processing methods on sex-related brain activity are detailed in Supplementary Information, Section 2.6.
The individual brain activity estimates were then extracted from the significant clusters using Marsbar (http://marsbar.sourceforge.net/) and entered into post hoc two-sample t-tests comparing DLPFC activity on all combinations of COMT genotypes and Dys Hap within the sex groups (α < 0.05). To assess brain-behavior relationships, we conducted linear regressions between individual DLPFC activity estimates and working memory performance across sex groups. We used the hit rate, reaction time, and the efficiency rate as continuous predictors in three separate analyses (α < 0.05) including the COMT rs4633 genotype, and Dys Hap as categorical factors. Statistical analyses were performed through R, version 4.1.2.
Results
Dysbindin affects the cognitive functions of mice in a sex-dependent manner
To selectively address the Sex × Dys interaction, we used both female and male mice with the hypofunction of the Dys gene (Dys + /− mice). This approach avoided possible confounders related to human studies, such as genetic heterogeneity, environmental effects, and pathological state. We tested both Dys + /− female and Dys + /− male mice on the TOR test which is sensitive to dopaminergic signaling within the mPFC [15, 59]. Remarkably and in contrast with results obtained in Dys + /− male mice, the Dys + /− female mice tested in the TOR test did not show differences compared to their Dys + /+ littermates (Fig. 1B; 2way-ANOVA Sex-Genotype interaction F(1,106) = 9.58, **p = 0.0025, Sex effect F(1,106) = 13.20 ***p < 0.001, Sex effect F(1,106) = 0.082; p = 0.7746; Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test; p > 0.999 vs. Dys + /− female, **p = 0.0018. vs. Dys + /− male; Dys + /+ female n = 32; male: n = 12, Dys + /− female n = 35 male n = 9), suggesting that the Dys genotype affects cognitive functions differently in a sex-biased manner. No differences in total exploration time were observed between the groups (Fig. 1C). Subsequently, to avoid any confounding factor related to the ovarian cycle and to assess the role of hormonal fluctuation throughout the estrous cycle in Dys-related cognitive performance, we tested female Dys + /+ and Dys + /− female mice in the TOR test also according to the four phases of the ovarian cycle (Fig. 1F). Indeed, cognition in women and female mice have been reported to be dependent on the estrus state [60–64]. There was a main effect of the estrous cycle with greater performance in mice that during the test were in their proestrus or estrous phase, in which E2 levels peak and begin to decline, compared to those in metestrus or diestrus, both characterized by low E2 levels (Fig. 1D; 2way-ANOVA, Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). To further elucidate the relationship between E2 levels during the ovarian cycle and the cognitive performance of Dys mice, we separated the ovarian cycle into two macro-phases defined as the ‘estrus’ (E) period, the period that encloses proestrus (marked by a rise in estrogen) and estrus, (when estrogen levels begin to decline), and the phase defined as the ‘non-estrus’ (NE) period (metestrus and diestrus phases) [65]. This analysis revealed a main effect of the E period in the TOR test (Fig. 1G; Dys + /+ n = 43 (E n = 24; NE n = 19); Dys + /− n = 46 (E n = 23, NE n = 23); 2Way-ANOVA, Estrus cycle F(1,85) = 69.90; ***p < 0.0001; Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test ***p < 0.0001). No effect on total exploration time was detected (Fig. 1E–H).
Together, these results show that Dys + /− female mice, in contrast with their male counterpart, do not show TOR memory impairment. Further, they confirm the prominent role of the interaction between E2 levels Dys genotype in modulating cognitive abilities in females.
Ovariectomy produces cognitive impairments in female Dys + /− mice
To assess whether peripheral E2 levels were responsible for the lack of cognitive impairment in female Dys + /− mice, we used a surgical approach in which the ovaries, the main source of E2, were removed in both Dys + /+ and Dys + /− female mice (Fig. 2A). As expected, sham-operated female Dys + /− mice did not show differences compared to their Dys + /+ littermates when tested in the TOR test. Conversely, ovariectomized Dys + /− female mice exhibited poorer performance in the TOR test than Dys + /+ mice (Fig. 2B; 2Way-ANOVA: genotype effect F(1,51) = 9.690, **p < 0.003, surgery effect F(1,51) = 3.425, p = 0.07; Surgery-Genotype interaction F(1,51) = 9.674, **p = 0.0031 Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test. *p = 0.011 Dys + /− Sham vs. Dys + /− OVX; ***p = 0.0001 Dys + /+ OVX vs Dys + /− OVX; Dys + /+ Sham n = 15, OVX n = 16, Dys + /− Sham n = 11, OVX n = 14). This suggests that the loss of estrogens recapitulates the behavioral phenotype of male Dys + /− mice.
Rodents that underwent ovariectomy have been widely reported to show different characteristics, such as increased body weight and reduced uterine weight due to uterus involution [66, 67]. To validate the surgical approach of ovariectomy used in these experiments, the body weight of the mice was monitored from the immediate postoperative period (two weeks after ovariectomy) for 15 days, and the uterine weight was measured immediately after sacrifice. The 15-day analysis showed a main effect of surgery with a statistically significant increase in body weight (BW) in both Dys + /+ and Dys + /− OVX compared to the respective sham-operated animals (Fig. S1D; 3Way-ANOVA, Day F(7,273) = 4.349, ***p = 0.0001; Surgery F(1,39) = 28.88, ***p < 0.001 and genotype F(1,39) = 20.50 **p < 0.0001 Day-Genotype interaction F(7,273) = 3.730 p = 0.0007. Fisher’s LSD Multiple comparison: ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 vs. Dys + /+ Sham, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Dys + /− Sham). Uterine weight (UW), assessed after sacrifice, shows a main effect of the surgery procedure demonstrated by the reduced %UW/BW ratio in OVX compared to sham (Fig. S1E; 2Way-ANOVA Surgery effect F(1,27) = 65.16,***p < 0.0001, Genotype effect F(1,27) = 0.02435 p = 0.8772, Surgery-Genotype interaction F(1,27) = 0.00061 p = 0.9804. Fisher’s LSD Multiple Comparisons: ***p < 0.001 vs Dys + /+ sham,***p < 0.001 vs Dys + /− sham).
These results suggest that genetic variants reducing Dys expression and affecting cognitive abilities could become functional in females only when estrogen’s protective effect is attenuated.
17ß-estradiol rescues Dys-dependent cognitive deficits in both Dys + /− male and Dys + /− ovariectomized female mice
To identify the role of E2 in Dys-dependent cognitive functions, we tested Dys + /− male and female mice in the TOR test. We achieved the control over the hormonal status of Dys female mice using ovariectomy (OVX) and pharmacological treatment with exogenous E2. Therefore, we first ovariectomized Dys + /− female mice, in order to have two cohorts of animals, male and female, with both the same behavioral performance in the TOR test and a similar E2 hormonal state. Then, we treated both Dys + /− male and Dys + /− OVX female mice with E2 administered peroral for 15 days (Fig. 2A). Lastly, we tested treated Dys + /− male and Dys + /− OVX female mice in the TOR behavioral paradigm 24 h after the last administration. The 2way-ANOVA revealed the presence of a significant Treatment-Genotype interaction. Chronic E2 supplementation rescued cognitive impairments in Dys + /− OVX female mice without affecting the cognitive performance of controls (female Dys + /+ OVX mice; Fig. 2E). These data suggest that peripheral estrogen fluctuations throughout the lifespan might concur to the magnitude of the heritable component of cognitive dysfunctions in female patients with schizophrenia.
To determine whether exogenous E2 treatment is able to rescue Dys-related cognitive dysfunction in males, we chronically treated Dys + /− and Dys + /+ male mice with E2 for 15 days. Estradiol supplementation rescued cognitive impairments exhibited by Dys + /− male mice, without influencing the performance of controls (Dys + /+ male mice; Fig. 2H). In both male and female mice, E2 treatment had no consequences on total exploration time (Fig. 2F–I).
Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) contributes to the sexual dimorphism in dysbindin-related cognitive functions
Western Blot analysis carried out on mPFC of Dys + /− mutant and control mice (Dys + /+) showed modulation of COMT protein expression according to E2 levels (OVX or E2 treatment; Fig. 2D–G–L). In basal conditions, Dys + /− females showed no differences in COMT levels in mPFC as compared with their controls (Dys + /+;p = 0.144; Fig. 2D). The lack of E2 in OVX female animals increased COMT levels in Dys + /− but not in their controls (sham operated Dys + /− and Dys + /+; 2Way-ANOVA Genotype effect F(1,15) = 25.49 ***p = 0.0001, Surgery effect F(1,15) = 7.854 *p = 0.0134. Bonferroni multiple comparison test ***p < 0.0001 vs Dys + /+ OVX, #p < 0.05 vs Dys + /− Sham. Figure 2D). Notably, the chronic treatment with E2 restored COMT to control levels in OVX Dys + /− female mice, confirming the presence of a Treatment-Genotype interaction in the modulation of COMT protein (2Way-ANOVA Genotype-Treatment interaction F(1,16) = 7.898, *p = 0.0126, Genotype effect F(1,16) = 9.678 **p = 0.001, Treatment effect F(1,16) = 1.855, p = 0.912. Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test **p < 0.0001 vs Dys + /+ OVX, #p < 0.05 vs Dys + /− E2. Fig. 2G). These data indicate that E2 selectively modulates COMT levels in the mPFC of female animals with disrupted dopamine transmission triggered by Dys reduction. The higher COMT levels in mPFC of Dys + /− male mice in basal conditions (Fig. 2L) confirm that the COMT-Dys functional interaction is involved in the modulation of cognitive functions. Consistent with these results, chronic treatment with E2 is capable of restoring the COMT levels of Dys + /− male mice to the control levels (Fig. 2L), suggesting the presence of a sex-driven Dys-COMT epistatic interaction in the control of cognitive functions in mice.
Dysbindin gene expression changes in a sex-dependent manner in humans
To discern variations in Dys gene expression between sexes, we tested sex differences in DTNBP1 expression in the hippocampus, DLPFC, and caudate through two-sample t tests accounting for regional specificity of gene expression across age groups, i.e., perinatal (1–6 years), juvenile (12–25 years), young adults (25.1–50 years), and older adults (50.1–90 years). We found significantly higher gene expression in males compared with females during the juvenile period for DTNBP1 in the hippocampus, t(15) = 3.48, *pFDR = 0.010. After the juvenile period, significantly higher gene expression was found in women compared with men; namely, nominally significantly higher expression of DTNBP1 in DLPFC in younger adults, t(51) = −2.37, *pFDR = 0.065, and older adults, t(49) = −2.19, *pFDR = 0.050, and greater expression of DTNBP1 in the hippocampus in older adults, t(62) = −2.56, *pFDR = 0.038. Results are depicted in Fig. 3. These results indicate the existence of sex- and age-related differences in Dys expression, suggesting a potential sex-biased effect on Dys-dependent functional outcomes. Chi-square tests to assess sex and age differences across postmortem samples revealed a significant sex difference across age groups specifically for hippocampus samples, χ2(3,276) = 10.90, p = 0.012, whereas no significant relationship between age group and sex was found for DLPFC, χ2(3, 261) = 6.14, p = 0.105, or caudate, χ2(3, 259) = 0.74, p = 0.863. The results of these tests exclude possible sampling bias effects from influencing our results regarding DLPFC and caudate. However, they also caution about potential sampling bias effects of results in the hippocampus.
Interactions between Catechol-O-Methyltransferase single nucleotide polymorphism rs4680 and sex on DTNBP1 gene expression in humans
To replicate the results observed in mice on the interaction between Dys gene expression and COMT activity in human postmortem samples, we separately tested for age groups and brain regions for significant interaction between sex and the COMT rs4680 genotype on DTNBP1 expression using 2way-ANOVAs. We found a significant interaction between sex and COMT rs4680 on DTNBP1 expression in the DLPFC in young adults (F(2,87) = 3.34, *puncorr = 0.040), and in the caudate in the perinatal - age group (F(1,19) = 10.22, **puncorr = 0.006; Fig. 4). All other analyses of variance yielded no significant interaction effects between sex and COMT rs4680 genotype on DTNBP1 expression, all puncorr > 0.05 (Fig. 4). These findings confirm a functional interaction of COMT on Dys gene expression across sexes, specifically evident in the DLPFC during adulthood.
Sex-driven Dys-COMT epistatic interaction in fMRI brain activity during the N-back task performance
To establish a relationship between the observed interaction of COMT on Dys gene expression across sexes in postmortem DLPFC samples and its reflection on behavioral outcomes, mirroring the results observed in mice, we analyzed brain activity in a sample of living humans while performing the N-back task – a task sensitive to dopaminergic signaling in DLPFC. The two-sample t-test revealed a significant difference between the males and females included in the sample in terms of age, with males older than females (t(206) = 2.07, p = 0.04). Furthermore, separate two-sample t-tests revealed significantly higher IQ (t(160) = −4.71, p = 4.63 × 10−06), and higher working memory performance in terms of Hit rate (t(131) = −4.30, p = 2.64 × 10−05), working memory efficiency rate, i.e., the ratio between accuracy and reaction time (t(101) = −4.21, p = 4 × 10−05) [57], and lower reaction time (t(104) = 4.61, p = 7.18 × 10−06) in males compared with females. To control for these differences, we included age and IQ as nuisance covariates in group statistical analysis, while interindividual variability during the N-back task was used to test brain-behavior associations. Further control analysis on age-related effects is reported in the Supplementary Information, Section 2.7.
To investigate the interaction between COMT genotype, Dys Hap, and sex (categorical predictors: male vs female; COMTVal/Val vs COMTMetCar; Dys Hap + /+ vs Dys Hap + /−), we performed a voxel-wise three-way ANOVA on individual brain activity during the N-back task. The main effects of the sex, COMT genotype, and Dys Hap were not significant (pTFCE-FWE > 0.05). Instead, a significant three-way interaction between sex, COMT genotype, and Dys Hap in a cluster located in the left DLPFC (Brodmann Area 9; Z = 3.49; *pTFCE-FWE = 0.04; Fig. 5a) suggested a sex-dependent functional epistasis between COMT and Dys Hap, in absence of detectable main effects.
To further explore this interaction in the DLPFC activity, we performed post hoc two-sample t-tests comparing DLPFC activity on all combinations of COMT genotypes and Dys Hap within the sex groups. The results in females showed a reversed activation pattern as function of Dys Hap comparing COMTVal/Val with higher DLPFC activity than COMTMetCar in Dys + /− condition (t(23) = 3.22; **pFDR = 0.009), and COMTVal/Val with lower DLPFC activity than COMTMetCar in Dys + /+ condition (t(32) = 3.63; **pFDR = 0.005). On the other hand, results in males showed no significant differences comparing COMTVal/Val and COMTMetCar as a function of Dys Hap, however, DLPFC activity was lower in COMTVal/Val males with Dys Hap + /− compared with Dys Hap + /+ (t(23) = −3.21; **pFDR = 0.009) in the opposite direction compared with the females’ activation pattern (t(27) = 3.37; **pFDR = 0.008). Aligned with the findings in the mouse model, our results indicate that the Dys Hap affects cognitive brain function in a sex-biased manner, interacting with the COMT rs4633 genotype. Specifically, Dys Hap + /− males show reduced DLPFC activity in the presence of possibly higher COMT levels, whereas Dys Hap + /− females show increased DLPFC activity.
Regarding functional behavioral outcomes, we conducted linear regressions to assess the relationship between individual DLPFC activity estimates and working memory performance across sex groups. We separately testes the hit rate, reaction time, and the efficiency rate based on the N-back task responses including the COMT rs4633 genotype, and Dys Hap as categorical factors. Linear models revealed a significant negative association between the reaction time and DLPFC activity estimates in females with COMTMetCar and Dys + /− (r = −0.39; puncorr = 0.02), while a significant positive association between the reaction time and the DLPFC activity estimates (r = 0.37; puncorr = 0.05), and a negative association between the efficiency rate and the DLPFC activity estimates (r = −0.38; puncorr = 0.04) were found in males with COMTMetCar and Dys Hap + /−. Results are depicted in Fig. 5c and Fig. S3.
Taken together these findings indicate that DLPFC activity exhibits sex-based variations and is contingent upon the genetic combination of Dys Hap and COMT. This variability potentially influences individual cognitive performance, which we found lower in males with Dys +/− and elevated COMT levels, while it was preserved in females under similar conditions.
Discussion
This study aimed to investigate sex differences in dysbindin-related cognitive dysfunctions with relevance to pathophysiological mechanisms of sexual dimorphisms in schizophrenia. Through a multidisciplinary approach combining behavioral and molecular findings on genetic animal models and human genetic and fMRI data, our results revealed a sexual dimorphism in working memory performance associated with a functional genetic variant characterized by reduced Dys protein expression, through the functional epistatic contribution of COMT (as recapitulated in Fig. S5). Previous evidence demonstrated that genetic-dependent reduced expression of Dys exerts a prominent effect on cognitive-related PFC functional activation in humans and mice [15, 38]. Nevertheless, these studies did not consider potential gene-by-sex interactions. However, many human diseases, including schizophrenia, exhibit sex-specific characteristics, including age of onset, prevalence, progression, severity of symptoms, and response to treatment [68, 69]. Different factors may contribute to these sex-dependent features, including endogenous [5, 70], exogenous [71], and genetic factors [72]. Endogenous factors, such as hormones or their alteration, could trigger sex-specific regulatory pathways that influence molecular traits and contribute to sex differences in the genetic architecture of complex diseases [73]. The approaches used in this scenario, wherein a functional genetic variant changes the relative expression of the DTNBP1 gene in a sex-dependent manner combined with a preclinical model of ovariectomy in female Dys mutant mice, allowed us to distinguish phenotypes regulated by sex-by-gene interaction from phenotypes for which Dys exerts independent or no effects. Furthermore, consistent findings in humans and mice strengthen the conclusion that reduction of Dys activity causes cognitive impairments only in males [15]. Intriguingly, our findings suggest that genetic variants that reduce the expression of Dys protein could be disadvantageous in females when the protective effect of estrogens decreases with aging, i.e., during menopause [30].
The quantification of DTNBP1 gene expression in human post-mortem samples revealed the presence of sex-driven and age-related changes in Dys expression. Interestingly, DTNBP1 expression is differentially modulated in males and females throughout life, with an increase in Dys expression in the DLPFC of females after the juvenile and adulthood periods. Thus, parsing the age of the sample is important in sex studies of gene expression to account for hormonal changes during the lifespan. Consistent with these results, the findings from mutant mice with reduced levels of Dys showed the presence of a sexual-behavioral dimorphism driven by the DTNBP1 gene. Notably, we found the effect of the estrous cycle to be critical to female mice cognition, showing a working memory impairment associated with lower Dys expression and estrogen deficiency induced by ovariectomy. These findings are supported by earlier studies showing that working memory and cognitive function, in human and mouse females, are highly dependent on the physiological estrogen fluctuation throughout the estrous cycle [60–64, 74]. Interestingly, the effects of the estrous cycle were more prominent in mPFC-driven cognitive function, whereas only a marginal role of sex hormones was observed in other schizophrenia-relevant phenotypes. These findings corroborate prior evidence revealing estrogen’s beneficial effects on frontal cortex-dependent tasks in mice [75] and humans [76]. The impact of estrogen deprivation in mice or physiological decline in women is widely associated with cognitive performance decline [77]. The loss of the main source of estrogens in female Dys mice led to an impairment in working memory similar to that shown by male Dys mice tested on the same mPFC-dependent behavioral task. Furthermore, chronic treatment with E2 also rescued Dys-related cognitive dysfunction in male Dys + /− mice. Considering the high haplotype frequency of the genetic variants of Dys within the general population (ranging from 0.58 to 0.95) and among patients with schizophrenia (ranging from 0.59 to 0.95), as reported in the latest Genome-Wide Association Study on schizophrenia [78], we speculate that further studies of E2 might consider it as an add-on therapy for patients with schizophrenia [79]. Furthermore, estrogens can have also beneficial pharmacokinetic effects as they directly increase the plasma concentration of antipsychotic drugs by regulating enzymes that metabolize antipsychotics, which is most evident for clozapine and olanzapine [80].
The presence of an indirect interaction between estrogens and Dys, mediated via COMT is in line with studies showing that the COMT gene contains two ERE sequences [29], and the data demonstrating the central inhibitory effect of catechol estrogen on COMT activity [81]. Overall, our findings in mice provide evidence that the beneficial cognitive effects of E2 should be considered in combination with the epistatic interaction of COMT/Dys genes. Notably, neuroprotective effects of augmented estrogen levels have been reported in post-menopause women [63, 72], as well as in men undergoing the gender-affirming hormone treatment, combined therapy of estrogen and antiandrogen hormones, resulting in enhanced cognitive abilities [74, 82]. The analysis of COMT rs4680 and sex on DTNBP1 gene expression in humans further corroborates our hypothesis. We showed an interaction between sex and COMT on DTNBP1 expression in the DLPFC selectively in the younger adults between 25 and 50 years of age when individuals reach full maturity. This study adds to previous knowledge showing the implication of COMT rs4680 in schizophrenia-related cognitive impairments, its relationship with sex, and Dys gene expression in humans during adulthood [72].
The assessment of DLPFC functional activity in humans using the fMRI further reinforces our findings and suggests an approach to translate neurobiological mechanisms from mice to humans. However, further investigation in larger and longitudinal samples would be needed to disentangle the role of estrogen levels on cognition in interaction with Dys/COMT. Indeed, the unavailability of estrogen information in our female human samples precludes a comprehensive understanding of how estrogens might influence cognitive processes associated with Dys expression variability and COMT in humans. Moreover, as our brain imaging sample included only adults, we could not explore potential developmental and aging effects in humans [83]. While it is possible that males and females differ in the age component of the functional interaction we detected, when age differences between groups were corrected the interaction persisted. This prompts speculation that studies on schizophrenia that mainly combine male and female adults to investigate potential etiological aspects may have overlooked molecular effects associated with sex and age.
In conclusion, the present study supports the relevance of sexual dimorphism on the cognitive mechanisms associated with schizophrenia, and how this could be affected by age-specific changes. These findings can provide new insights into the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders and contribute to the development of additional tools for patient stratification for precision medicine.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research Projects of National Relevance (PRIN) 2017 Prot. 2017K2NEF4 awarded to GP, FS, and FD; by the PRIN 2017- Prot. 201779W93T and PRIN PNRR2022 - Prot.P2022HNBJX to G.M.L; the University of Catania Intramural Funds (PIACERI) to G.M.L.; by #NEXTGENERATIONEU (NGEU) and funded by the Ministry of University and Research (MUR), National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), project MNESYS (PE0000006) – A Multiscale integrated approach to the study of the nervous system in health and disease (DN. 1553 11.10.2022) to AB, GP, GB, and AR; by the funding initiative Horizon Europe Seeds 2021 (Next Generation 8 EU - MUR D.M. 737/2021) for the project S68 CUP H99J21017550006 to GP; by the Apulian regional government for the project: “Early Identification of Psychosis Risk” to AB; by a Collaboration Grant from Exprivia Spa to GP under the ministerial decree D.M. n. 352/22 and AB under a collaboration agreement. We would also like to thank Antonella Lupo, Rosa Barca, Riccarda Lomuscio (Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy), Dr. Alfonso Monaco (Department of Physics, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy), and Dr. Elvisha Dhamala (The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital in Glen Oaks, NY) for their help at different stages of this research.
Author contributions
FG, RP, FS, GP, and GML conceived and designed the study. FG and GML performed behavioral experiments. FG, SL, and ACEG performed molecular biology experiments. RP, NP, GCK, MP, LS, and GP performed analyses on brain post mortem samples. GML, GP, FS, FP, AB, and FD supervised all the experiments. FG and GML analyzed behavioral data. GB, CM, AR, NT, FS, AB, and GP performed and analyzed fMRi experiments. FG, RP, FS, GP, and GML wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request. Post-mortem data that support the findings were used under license from the Lieber Institute for Brain Development (LIBD). Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request with detailed motives and objectives. Participant data reported in this article can be shared in compliance with current data protection regulations by the European Union. Data requestor will be required to sign a data access agreement with the authors and the University of Bari.
Competing interests
AB received consulting fees from Biogen and lecture fees from Otsuka, Janssen, and Lundbeck. GB and GP received lecture fees from Lundbeck. AR received travel fees from Lundbeck. All other authors have no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Federica Geraci, Roberta Passiatore.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Fabio Sambataro, Giulio Pergola, Gian Marco Leggio.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41380-024-02527-3.
References
- 1.Riecher-Rossler A, Butler S, Kulkarni J. Sex and gender differences in schizophrenic psychoses-a critical review. Arch Women’s Ment Health. 2018;21:627–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.NIH Inclusion Outreach Toolkit: How to Engage, Recruit, and Retain Women in Clinical Research. https://orwh.od.nih.gov/toolkit/nih-policies-inclusion/guidelines, Accessed Date Accessed 2015 Accessed. (2015).
- 3.Li X, Zhou W, Yi Z. A glimpse of gender differences in schizophrenia. Gen Psychiatr. 2022;35:e100823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hafner H, Maurer K, Loffler W, Riecher-Rossler A. The influence of age and sex on the onset and early course of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;162:80–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Riecher-Rossler A, Hafner H, Stumbaum M, Maurer K, Schmidt R. Can estradiol modulate schizophrenic symptomatology? Schizophr Bull. 1994;20:203–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith SM, Nichols TE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2009;44:83–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang B, Han M, Tan S, De Yang F, Tan Y, Jiang S, et al. Gender differences measured by the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery in chronic schizophrenia patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Straub RE, Jiang Y, MacLean CJ, Ma Y, Webb BT, Myakishev MV, et al. Genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene DTNBP1, the human ortholog of the mouse dysbindin gene, is associated with schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:337–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scheggia D, Mastrogiacomo R, Mereu M, Sannino S, Straub RE, Armando M, et al. Variations in Dysbindin-1 are associated with cognitive response to antipsychotic drug treatment. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mastrogiacomo R, Trigilio G, Devroye C, Dautan D, Ferretti V, Losi G, et al. Dysbindin-1A modulation of astrocytic dopamine and basal ganglia dependent behaviors relevant to schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:4201–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghiani CA, Starcevic M, Rodriguez-Fernandez IA, Nazarian R, Cheli VT, Chan LN, et al. The dysbindin-containing complex (BLOC-1) in brain: developmental regulation, interaction with SNARE proteins and role in neurite outgrowth. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:204–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma X, Fei E, Fu C, Ren H, Wang G. Dysbindin-1, a schizophrenia-related protein, facilitates neurite outgrowth by promoting the transcriptional activity of p53. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:1105–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ji Y, Yang F, Papaleo F, Wang HX, Gao WJ, Weinberger DR, et al. Role of dysbindin in dopamine receptor trafficking and cortical GABA function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19593–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Talbot K, Ong W-Y, Blake D, Tang J, Louneva N, Carlson G, et al. Dysbindin-1 and its protein family. Handbook of neurochemistry and molecular neurobiology. US: Springer; 2009. p. 107–241.
- 15.Leggio GM, Torrisi SA, Mastrogiacomo R, Mauro D, Chisari M, Devroye C, et al. The epistatic interaction between the dopamine D3 receptor and dysbindin-1 modulates higher-order cognitive functions in mice and humans. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:1272–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dickman DK, Davis GW. The schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin controls synaptic homeostasis. Science. 2009;326:1127–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mullin AP, Sadanandappa MK, Ma W, Dickman DK, VijayRaghavan K, Ramaswami M, et al. Gene dosage in the dysbindin schizophrenia susceptibility network differentially affect synaptic function and plasticity. J Neurosci. 2015;35:325–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang CCY, Muszynski KJ, Bolshakov VY, Balu DT. Deletion of Dtnbp1 in mice impairs threat memory consolidation and is associated with enhanced inhibitory drive in the amygdala. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Williams OOF, Coppolino M, George SR, Perreault ML. Sex Differences in Dopamine Receptors and Relevance to Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Brain Sci. 2021;11:1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weickert CS, Rothmond DA, Hyde TM, Kleinman JE, Straub RE. Reduced DTNBP1 (dysbindin-1) mRNA in the hippocampal formation of schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res. 2008;98:105–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Winterer G, Weinberger DR. Genes, dopamine and cortical signal-to-noise ratio in schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:683–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Papaleo F, Burdick MC, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR. Epistatic interaction between COMT and DTNBP1 modulates prefrontal function in mice and in humans. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:311–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Savage JE, Jansen PR, Stringer S, Watanabe K, Bryois J, de Leeuw CA, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nat Genet. 2018;50:912–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Waddington JL, Zhen X, O’Tuathaigh CMP. Developmental Genes and Regulatory Proteins, Domains of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia Spectrum Psychosis and Implications for Antipsychotic Drug Discovery: The Example of Dysbindin-1 Isoforms and Beyond. Front Pharm. 2019;10:1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meyers B, D’Agostino A, Walker J, Kritzer MF. Gonadectomy and hormone replacement exert region- and enzyme isoform-specific effects on monoamine oxidase and catechol-O-methyltransferase activity in prefrontal cortex and neostriatum of adult male rats. Neuroscience. 2010;165:850–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schendzielorz N, Rysa A, Reenila I, Raasmaja A, Mannisto PT. Complex estrogenic regulation of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) in rats. J Physiol Pharm. 2011;62:483–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen J, Song J, Yuan P, Tian Q, Ji Y, Ren-Patterson R, et al. Orientation and cellular distribution of membrane-bound catechol-O-methyltransferase in cortical neurons: implications for drug development. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:34752–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gonzalez-Castro TB, Hernandez-Diaz Y, Juarez-Rojop IE, Lopez-Narvaez ML, Tovilla-Zarate CA, Fresan A. The Role of a Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met Genetic Polymorphism in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-analysis on 32,816 Subjects. Neuromol Med. 2016;18:216–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xie T, Ho SL, Ramsden D. Characterization and implications of estrogenic down-regulation of human catechol-O-methyltransferase gene transcription. Mol Pharm. 1999;56:31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dumas JA, Makarewicz JA, Bunn J, Nickerson J, McGee E. Dopamine-dependent cognitive processes after menopause: the relationship between COMT genotype, estradiol, and working memory. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;72:53–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dean B, Parkin GM, Gibbons AS. Associations between catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotypes at rs4818 and rs4680 and gene expression in human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2020;238:477–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Eugene AR, Masiak J. A pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation study identifying gender differences of daily olanzapine dose and dopamine D2-receptor occupancy. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:417–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Seeman MV. Pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia in postmenopausal women. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19:809–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Torretta S, Rampino A, Basso M, Pergola G, Di Carlo P, Shin JH, et al. NURR1 and ERR1 Modulate the Expression of Genes of a DRD2 Coexpression Network Enriched for Schizophrenia Risk. J Neurosci. 2020;40:932–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pergola G, Di Carlo P, D’Ambrosio E, Gelao B, Fazio L, Papalino M, et al. DRD2 co-expression network and a related polygenic index predict imaging, behavioral and clinical phenotypes linked to schizophrenia. Transl psychiatry. 2017;7:e1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hwang WJ, Lee TY, Kim NS, Kwon JS. The Role of Estrogen Receptors and Their Signaling across Psychiatric Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22:373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Seamans JK, Lapish CC, Durstewitz D. Comparing the prefrontal cortex of rats and primates: insights from electrophysiology. Neurotox Res. 2008;14:249–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Papaleo F, Yang F, Garcia S, Chen J, Lu B, Crawley JN, et al. Dysbindin-1 modulates prefrontal cortical activity and schizophrenia-like behaviors via dopamine/D2 pathways. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:85–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Talbot K. The sandy (sdy) mouse: a dysbindin-1 mutant relevant to schizophrenia research. Prog Brain Res. 2009;179:87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Caligioni CS. Assessing reproductive status/stages in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2009; Appendix 4:Appendix 4I. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Byers SL, Wiles MV, Dunn SL, Taft RA. Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cora MC, Kooistra L, Travlos G. Vaginal cytology of the laboratory rat and mouse: review and criteria for the staging of the estrous cycle using stained vaginal smears. Toxicol Pathol. 2015;43:776–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Idris AI. Ovariectomy/orchidectomy in rodents. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;816:545–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Souza VR, Mendes E, Casaro M, Antiorio A, Oliveira FA, Ferreira CM. Description of Ovariectomy Protocol in Mice. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1916:303–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ingberg E, Theodorsson A, Theodorsson E, Strom JO. Methods for long-term 17beta-estradiol administration to mice. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012;175:188–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Strom JO, Theodorsson A, Ingberg E, Isaksson IM, Theodorsson E. Ovariectomy and 17beta-estradiol replacement in rats and mice: a visual demonstration. J Vis Exp. 2012;64:e4013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Torrisi SA, Salomone S, Geraci F, Caraci F, Bucolo C, Drago F, et al. Buspirone Counteracts MK-801-Induced Schizophrenia-Like Phenotypes through Dopamine D(3) Receptor Blockade. Front Pharm. 2017;8:710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pergola G, Parihar M, Sportelli L, Bharadwaj R, Borcuk C, Radulescu E, et al. Consensus molecular environment of schizophrenia risk genes in coexpression networks shifting across age and brain regions. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eade2812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pergola G, Di Carlo P, Jaffe AE, Papalino M, Chen Q, Hyde TM, et al. Prefrontal Coexpression of Schizophrenia Risk Genes Is Associated With Treatment Response in Patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;86:45–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, et al. The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol. 2006;7:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weickert CS, Straub RE, McClintock BW, Matsumoto M, Hashimoto R, Hyde TM, et al. Human dysbindin (DTNBP1) gene expression in normal brain and in schizophrenic prefrontal cortex and midbrain. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:544–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Collado-Torres L, Burke EE, Peterson A, Shin J, Straub RE, Rajpurohit A, et al. Regional Heterogeneity in Gene Expression, Regulation, and Coherence in the Frontal Cortex and Hippocampus across Development and Schizophrenia. Neuron. 2019;103:203–216.e208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wechsler D. The psychometric tradition: Developing the wechsler adult intelligence scale. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1981;6:82–85. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen J, Lipska BK, Halim N, Ma QD, Matsumoto M, Melhem S, et al. Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:807–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bertolino A, Caforio G, Petruzzella V, Latorre V, Rubino V, Dimalta S, et al. Prefrontal dysfunction in schizophrenia controlling for COMT Val158Met genotype and working memory performance. Psychiatry Res. 2006;147:221–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Callicott JH, Bertolino A, Mattay VS, Langheim FJ, Duyn J, Coppola R, et al. Physiological dysfunction of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia revisited. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:1078–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pergola G, Di Carlo P, Andriola I, Gelao B, Torretta S, Attrotto MT, et al. Combined effect of genetic variants in the GluN2B coding gene (GRIN2B) on prefrontal function during working memory performance. Psychol Med. 2016;46:1135–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Taurisano P, Antonucci LA, Fazio L, Rampino A, Romano R, Porcelli A, et al. Prefrontal activity during working memory is modulated by the interaction of variation in CB1 and COX2 coding genes and correlates with frequency of cannabis use. Cortex. 2016;81:231–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Manago F, Mereu M, Mastwal S, Mastrogiacomo R, Scheggia D, Emanuele M, et al. Genetic Disruption of Arc/Arg3.1 in Mice Causes Alterations in Dopamine and Neurobehavioral Phenotypes Related to Schizophrenia. Cell Rep. 2016;16:2116–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Luine VN, Richards ST, Wu VY, Beck KD. Estradiol enhances learning and memory in a spatial memory task and effects levels of monoaminergic neurotransmitters. Horm Behav. 1998;34:149–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fader AJ, Johnson PE, Dohanich GP. Estrogen improves working but not reference memory and prevents amnestic effects of scopolamine of a radial-arm maze. Pharm Biochem Behav. 1999;62:711–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Duff SJ, Hampson E. A beneficial effect of estrogen on working memory in postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy. Horm Behav. 2000;38:262–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Krug R, Born J, Rasch B. A 3-day estrogen treatment improves prefrontal cortex-dependent cognitive function in postmenopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31:965–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cordeira J, Kolluru SS, Rosenblatt H, Kry J, Strecker RE, McCarley RW. Learning and memory are impaired in the object recognition task during metestrus/diestrus and after sleep deprivation. Behav Brain Res. 2018;339:124–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Clemens AM, Lenschow C, Beed P, Li L, Sammons R, Naumann RK, et al. Estrus-cycle regulation of cortical inhibition. Curr Biol. 2019;29:605–615.e606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hubscher CH, Brooks DL, Johnson JR. A quantitative method for assessing stages of the rat estrous cycle. Biotech Histochem. 2005;80:79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lemini C, Jaimez R, Figueroa A, Martinez-Mota L, Avila ME, Medina M. Ovariectomy differential influence on some hemostatic markers of mice and rats. Exp Anim. 2015;64:81–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Oliva M, Munoz-Aguirre M, Kim-Hellmuth S, Wucher V, Gewirtz ADH, Cotter DJ, et al. The impact of sex on gene expression across human tissues. Science. 2020;369:eaba3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Riecher-Rossler A. Sex and gender differences in mental disorders. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:8–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li SH, Graham BM. Why are women so vulnerable to anxiety, trauma-related and stress-related disorders? The potential role of sex hormones. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:73–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sambuco N, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Trauma-related dysfunction in the fronto-striatal reward circuit. J Affect Disord. 2021;287:359–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Papaleo F, Sannino S, Piras F, Spalletta G. Sex-dichotomous effects of functional COMT genetic variations on cognitive functions disappear after menopause in both health and schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25:2349–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Khramtsova EA, Davis LK, Stranger BE. The role of sex in the genomics of human complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:173–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Krug R, Beier L, Lammerhofer M, Hallschmid M. Distinct and Convergent Beneficial Effects of Estrogen and Insulin on Cognitive Function in Healthy Young Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:e582–e593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Frye CA, Rhodes ME, Dudek B. Estradiol to aged female or male mice improves learning in inhibitory avoidance and water maze tasks. Brain Res. 2005;1036:101–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Girard R, Metereau E, Thomas J, Pugeat M, Qu C, Dreher JC. Hormone therapy at early post-menopause increases cognitive control-related prefrontal activity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Frick KM. Estrogens and age-related memory decline in rodents: what have we learned and where do we go from here? Horm Behav. 2009;55:2–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Trubetskoy V, Pardinas AF, Qi T, Panagiotaropoulou G, Awasthi S, Bigdeli TB, et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature. 2022;604:502–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Brand BA, de Boer JN, Sommer IEC. Estrogens in schizophrenia: progress, current challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021;34:228–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Seeman MV. Men and women respond differently to antipsychotic drugs. Neuropharmacology. 2020;163:107631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wu Q, Odwin-Dacosta S, Cao S, Yager JD, Tang WY. Estrogen down regulates COMT transcription via promoter DNA methylation in human breast cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2019;367:12–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Karalexi MA, Georgakis MK, Dimitriou NG, Vichos T, Katsimpris A, Petridou ET, et al. Gender-affirming hormone treatment and cognitive function in transgender young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;119:104721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Passiatore R, Antonucci LA, DeRamus TP, Fazio L, Stolfa G, Sportelli L, et al. Changes in patterns of age-related network connectivity are associated with risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2221533120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request. Post-mortem data that support the findings were used under license from the Lieber Institute for Brain Development (LIBD). Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request with detailed motives and objectives. Participant data reported in this article can be shared in compliance with current data protection regulations by the European Union. Data requestor will be required to sign a data access agreement with the authors and the University of Bari.