Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Sep 25;159(12):1438–1440. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3827

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection After Traumatic Hollow Viscus Injury

Janelle Cyprich 1, Amy H Kaji 2, Alexandra Moulton 1, Hye Kwang E Kim 1, Alexander C Schwed 1, Jessica A Keeley 1,
PMCID: PMC11425191  PMID: 39320877

Abstract

This cohort study investigates the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infection after traumatic hollow viscus injury.


Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major cause of morbidity after trauma laparotomy. Hollow viscus injury (HVI) increases risk of SSI.1 Current guidelines recommend no more than 24 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis (PPX) after traumatic HVI,2 but whether guideline adherence is associated with risk of SSI is unknown. This study investigates the association between PPX duration and SSI after traumatic HVI.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic level I trauma center. The Harbor-UCLA Institutional Review Board deemed it exempt and waived the need for informed consent. We followed the STROBE reporting guideline.

Adults (aged 18-79 years) with blunt or penetrating HVI who underwent laparotomy within 24 hours of presentation from December 1, 2014, to May 31, 2023, were included. Self-reported race and ethnicity were from the electronic medical record. Those who died within 48 hours of presentation or had a delayed presentation after injury were excluded.

We defined SSI according to established guidelines.3 Risk factors for SSI were identified using univariable analysis. Subgroup analysis of patients receiving 10 days or less of postoperative antibiotics was performed to evaluate PPX duration as a risk factor. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate independent associations between PPX duration and SSI. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 29.0 (IBM Corporation). A 2-sided P < .05 was considered significant by χ2 or Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

A total of 302 patients were included (median [IQR] age, 31 [26-24] years; 262 men [86.8%] and 40 women [13.2%]). Most patients (261 [86.4%]) sustained penetrating injuries, the majority being gunshot wounds (214 [82.0%]). Shock was present in 68 of 285 patients (23.9%), defined as presentation shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure)≥0.9. Damage control laparotomy was performed in 100 patients (33.1%). The most common antibiotics administered were ceftriaxone and metronidazole (225 of 302 [74.5%]). Surgical site infection occurred in 106 patients (35.1%), of whom 18 (17.0%) developed an isolated superficial SSI without organ space involvement.

Demographics and perioperative characteristics were compared between patients with and without SSI (Table). The SSI risk factors identified on univariable analysis for inclusion in our multivariable model included prior abdominal surgery (14 [13.2%] vs 9 [4.6%]; P = .007), penetrating trauma (98 [92.5%] vs 163 [83.2%]; P = .02), Injury Severity Score (median [IQR], 21.5 [14.0-29.0] vs 13.0 [9.0-21.5]; P < .001), number of HVIs (median [IQR], 4 [2-7] vs 2 [1-4]; P < .001), ostomy creation (19 [17.9%] vs 12 [6.1%]; P = .001), intraoperative blood transfusion (median [IQR], 4.5 [0.0-12.0] vs 0.5 [0.0-4.0] packed red blood cell units; P < .001), and intraoperative temperature (median [IQR], 35.0 [34.2-35.6] vs 35.5 [34.8-36.1] °C; P < .001).

Table. Baseline and Perioperative Characteristics of Patients With Traumatic HVI With and Without SSI.

Characteristic No. of patients (%) OR (95% CI)a P valueb
No SSI (n = 196) SSI (n = 106)
Age, y 32 (27-44) 32 (25-42) NS .69
Sex
Female 28 (14.3) 12 (11.3) NS .47
Male 168 (85.7) 94 (88.7) NS
Race and ethnicity
Asian 10 (5.1) 0 NA NA
Black 88 (44.9) 51 (48.1) NA NA
Hispanic 84 (42.9) 49 (46.2) NA NA
White, non-Hispanic 11 (5.6) 4. (3.8) NA NA
Not reported 3 (1.5) 2 (1.9) NA NA
BMI, median (IQR) 27.4 (24.5-31.2) 28.3 (24.5-34.5) NS .08
History of diabetes 5 (2.6) 5 (4.7) NS .25
Active smoker 13 (6.6) 14 (13.2) NS .06
Prior abdominal surgery 9 (4.6) 14 (13.2) 3.2 (1.3-7.6) .007
Presence of shock on arrivalc 40 (21.4) 28 (28.6) NS .18
Penetrating trauma 163 (83.2) 98 (92.5) 2.5 (1.1-5.6) .02
Injury Severity Score 13.0 (9.0-21.5) 21.5 (14.0-29.0) NA <.001
Ostomy creation 12 (6.1) 19 (17.9) 3.3 (1.6-7.2) .001
No. of HVIs, median (IQR) 2 (1-4) 4 (2-7) NA <.001
Damage control laparotomy 43 (21.9) 57 (53.8) 4.1 (2.5-6.9) <.001
Blood transfusion, median (IQR), units pRBC 0.5 (0-4) 4.5 (0-12) NA <.001
Operative time, median (IQR), min 156 (118-197) 174.5 (132-217) NA .02
Lowest intraoperative temperature, median (IQR), °C 35.5 (34.8-36.1) 35.0 (34.2-35.6) NA <.001

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); HVI, hollow viscus injury; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; pRBC, packed red blood cells; SSI, surgical site infection.

a

Only statistically significant unadjusted ORs for categorical variables are displayed.

b

Univariable analyses performed using χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

c

Calculated as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

Subgroup analysis of patients receiving 10 days or less of antibiotics found no association between PPX duration and development of SSI (Figure). On multivariable analysis, antibiotic duration of 24 hours or less was not associated with increased SSI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.8).

Figure. Risk of Surgical Site Infection Based on Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in a Subgroup of Patients Receiving 10 Days or Less of Antibiotics Postoperatively (n = 256).

Figure.

Discussion

In this cohort study, PPX of 24 hours or less was not associated with an increased risk of SSI, even after adjusting for known risk factors. Current guidelines2 are based primarily on a prospective study4 showing no difference in SSI between 1 and 5 days of postoperative ampicillin-sulbactam after penetrating HVI. That study reported an SSI incidence of 9%, significantly below the expected rate of 20% to 40% for class III/IV wounds.5,6 This discrepancy raises questions about the evidence behind current guidelines and may account for variable adherence. Our findings support current PPX guidelines,2 even in a population with a higher incidence of SSI.

This study is limited by its single-center, retrospective design. Indications for initial antibiotic administration were variably documented; thus, only patients who received continuous antibiotic administration postoperatively were included in the PPX duration subanalysis. Our study represents one of the largest cohorts with traumatic HVI to date. Prospective studies are needed to validate PPX guidelines for traumatic HVI and ultimately improve adherence.

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Seamon MJ, Smith BP, Capano-Wehrle L, et al. Skin closure after trauma laparotomy in high-risk patients: opening opportunities for improvement. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):433-439. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e2589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goldberg SR, Anand RJ, Como JJ, et al. ; Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma . Prophylactic antibiotic use in penetrating abdominal trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5)(suppl 4):S321-S325. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182701902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee . Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97-132. doi: 10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70088-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kirton OC, O’Neill PA, Kestner M, Tortella BJ. Perioperative antibiotic use in high-risk penetrating hollow viscus injury: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of 24 hours versus 5 days. J Trauma. 2000;49(5):822-832. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.O’Neill PA, Kirton OC, Dresner LS, Tortella B, Kestner MM. Analysis of 162 colon injuries in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: concomitant stomach injury results in a higher rate of infection. J Trauma. 2004;56(2):304-312. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000109856.25273.07 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salim A, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Brown C, Browder T, Demetriades D. Analysis of 178 penetrating stomach and small bowel injuries. World J Surg. 2008;32(3):471-475. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9350-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Surgery are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES