Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0307921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307921

Social-behavioral insights in understanding tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The MyTBNet study protocol

Zirwatul Adilah Aziz 1,2,#, Abdul Hadi Mohamad 3,#, Noorliza Mohamad Noordin 1, Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff 2,*,#
Editor: Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla4
PMCID: PMC11426513  PMID: 39325760

Abstract

Many countries have reported increase of TB incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic period, which demands dire attention as it may threaten global effort to end TB transmission. Services, are among many others, were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the years 2020 and 2021; but its impact on the TB transmission is not well understood. This retrospective population-based molecular and epidemiological cohort study aims to determine the pattern of TB transmission in Kuala Lumpur (an area with high population density, moderate TB burden and high rates of COVID-19 cases) for the cohort of Pulmonary TB (PTB) cases notified from 2020 until 2021 and factors associated with clustering or clear epidemiologic linkage. This study will be carried out from 2022 until 2024. The study will utilise comparative phylogenetic analysis to determine the degree of relatedness between different isolates, based on the genomes similarities, and overlay this with epidemiological, clinical and social network data to enhance understanding of the social-behavioural dynamics of TB transmission. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) cultures will be genotyped using Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number Tandem Repeats (MIRU-VNTR) and whole-genome sequence (WGS) for MTBC cluster isolates. Epidemiologic and genomic data will be overlaid on a social network constructed by means of interviews with patients, by using Social Network Analysis questionnaire, to determine the origins and transmission dynamics of the outbreak. The finding of this study would aid in the identification of TB transmission events, facilitating active case finding, TB screening, TB contact tracing, and the mapping of social contacts during critical period. This will contribute to building an effective preventive and preparedness strategy to interrupt TB transmission in Malaysia, tailored to the characteristics of the local population.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) presents a global public health challenge, disproportionately affecting the poorest and most vulnerable populations, particularly in Asia and Africa. According to the latest Stop TB Strategy by the World Health Organisation, an estimated 3.6 million people with TB are overlooked by health systems annually, potentially depriving them of necessary care [1]. In reaction to this, The World Health Organization through The End TB Strategy, firmly projected their aims to reduce TB incidence rate significantly by the year 2035 through one of its pillars [2]. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has compromised these efforts by significantly disrupting TB services worldwide, consequently escalating the incidence of TB, TB mortality rates, and the occurrence of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) during these periods. This is the first time in many years an increase has been reported in the number of people falling ill with TB and drug resistant TB [35].

Malaysia is classified as upper moderate TB burden country (Incidence rate of TB: 50–99 per 100,000 population). Malaysia has developed a National Strategic Plan (NSP) for TB Control, aligned with WHO milestones and targets, to end the TB epidemic by the year of 2035. Malaysia has been doing great in the efforts to provide excellent treatment, quality TB case management and systematic TB notification for all TB patients diagnosed in Malaysia. Contact tracing is one of the core activities and have been implemented in Malaysia to control TB transmission. The identified contact will be followed up for two years with four visits to health clinic. Yet, unfortunately, the incidence of new TB patients keeps on rising each year, and this has become one of the main challenges in TB control in Malaysia [6].

In the current tuberculosis contact management practices, active tracing only encompasses individuals residing in the same household or those in close contact with the index case for more than eight hours per day over a duration exceeding a month [7]. In this control strategy, we are not yet looking into the casual contact or other possible relationship between tuberculosis patients as well as the influence of social-behavioural factors on disease transmission pattern. Consequently, there is a critical need for a profound understanding of this issue. In-depth insights into this area could assist relevant experts in devising more precise and effective control strategies, thereby strengthening the TB control program.

The understanding of TB transmission pattern is fundamental because it will help in prioritisation of TB screening based on infection risk, characterisation of transmission networks and identification of transmission outside of the household settings [8]. In order to describe TB transmission dynamics in the population, it is necessary to be able to distinguish between recent transmission and activation of imported endemic strains. Molecular typing is a valuable contribution to the epidemiological analysis provided it is combined with thorough epidemiological investigations [9]. The ability to determine the proportion of tuberculosis cases attributable to recent transmission is vital because these cases are potentially preventable through improved tuberculosis control measures. Intensified contact investigations have been associated not only with a decrease in overall tuberculosis case rates but also with a reduction in the incidence of clustered cases [8].

Social network analysis (SNA) is a data analytics technique used to understand the structure of networks or connections between nodes (i.e., patients) in health studies [10, 11]. The potential of success in the use of SNA in contact tracing for Sexual Transmitted Diseases (STIs) has prompted several retrospective studies of TB outbreaks using SNA, often in combination with molecular epidemiology techniques [9, 1215]. SNA has been shown to improve active case finding by highlighting areas of social aggregation and identifying persons not named during traditional contact tracing [13]. In addition, this technique has also shown to be a promising tool that could help investigators prioritise contacts for the identification of both the infected and those who may develop TB disease [16]. With the idea in mind, the study primarily aims to elucidate the TB transmission pattern and its influencing factors involving PTB cases notified in year 2020 and 2021 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia by using the epidemiological data, social network data and genomic data.

Materials and methods

Study design

A retrospective, population-based, molecular, and epidemiological cohort study of patients diagnosed with TB will be carried out from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2024. This study will be conducted as a retrospective cohort study involving TB patients who were belongs to the COVID-19 pandemic year (diagnosed in 2020 and 2021) cohort diagnosed and receiving treatment in Kuala Lumpur. Retrospective cohort study design is justified as an appropriate design to answer the study objective due to its advantage in studying multiple exposures and multiple outcomes in one cohort. Besides, the combined effect of multiple exposures on disease risk can be determined.

Study area and study population

This study will be conducted in Kuala Lumpur, the capital city of Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur was chosen to be the study area because it examplifies regions with a high incidence of TB cases, high population density, heterogeneous population, and high rate of immigrants which open large opportunity for TB transmission and were mostly affected with high number of COVID-19 cases reported during the pandemic period of 2020 and 2021 [17]. To ensure the study samples accurately represent the population of TB patients in Kuala Lumpur, data will be collected from four health administrative areas: Titiwangsa, Lembah Pantai, Cheras, and Kepong. Data collection will be undertaken at 16 government TB treatment centres (PR1) in Kuala Lumpur, as listed in S1 Table. The target population for this study is all PTB patients notified in year 2020 and 2021 in Kuala Lumpur and receiving TB treatment in any of the 18 participating TB clinics in Kuala Lumpur.

Sample size and sampling method

Comprehensive social network analysis necessitates the empirical assessment of all TB patients in the predefined cohort who meet the study criteria to come out with a comprehensive social network analysis. Therefore, this study will involve all confirmed PTB patients notified in Kuala Lumpur from year 2020 to 2021. The required sample size for this study was determined using a simulation approach suitable for investigating sample sizes that are roughly needed for accurately estimating network parameters from cross-sectional using R package, powerly [18]. Based on the sample sizes calculations, the study requires a minimum of 250 to 350 PTB patients to observe moderate sensitivity and high specificity and edge weights correlations, when the networks are sparse and consist of 20 nodes or less. Participants will be recruited through purposive sampling of confirmed PTB patients notified from 2020 to 2021 and undergoing TB treatment at any of the 16 participating TB clinics in Kuala Lumpur, starting Jan 2022. The list of the TB cases will be retrieved from the Malaysian national TB database (MyTB) to obtain their TB registry number, and last treatment centre to locate their medical record. Subsequently, with assistance from nurses at the participating clinics, the research team will receive updates on names and contact details extracted from the patients’ medical records. Then, the research team will take charge of the other activities related to the study as to minimise the effects of proxy involvement (for instance carer, health care providers) in study interviews on the patients’ responses.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

This study will involve two stages of data collection, both involving the same participants. The first stage will consist of sociodemographic review and a social network questionnaire interview. Patients with the following characteristics will be eligible for this study.

The inclusion criteria for the social network interview:

  1. All types of PTB (both smear positive and negative) regardless of their culture results.

  2. Notified cases of year 2020 and 2021 and received treatment in government TB treatment centres in Kuala Lumpur.

  3. Aged 18 years and above.

  4. Willing to participate and had provided informed consent

Meanwhile, the exclusion criteria for the social network interview include:

  1. Unwilling to participate or lack of consent

  2. Unreacheable due to an inactive contact number

  3. Transfer out cases.

  4. Dead

The inclusion criteria for the social network interview include all types of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), both smear-positive and smear-negative, regardless of their culture results. This pertains to notified cases between 2020 and 2021 who received treatment at Kuala Lumpur’s government TB treatment facilities. Furthermore, volunteers must be at least 18 years old and willing to engage after providing informed consent.

Individuals who are unwilling to participate or lack consent are excluded from the social network interview, as are those who are unreachable owing to an inactive contact number, cases that have been moved, and individuals who have died.

Next, the same participants will qualify for the second stage of data collection, which involves the analysis of molecular genotyping, provided they meet the following criteria. Inclusion criteria for genotyping:

  1. Culture-positive PTB patients.

Exclusion criteria for genotyping:

  1. Culture-negative cases or those with doubtful culture status

  2. Cases will be excluded if they met the standard criteria for laboratory cross contamination.

  3. Patients with Non-Tuberculosis Mycobacterium (NTM) infection

Next, the same participants will be eligible for the second stage of data collection, which involves the analysis of molecular genotyping, provided they meet specific criteria. For inclusion in the genotyping analysis, participants must be culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients. However, individuals will be excluded from this phase if they are culture-negative or have a doubtful culture status, meet the standard criteria for laboratory cross-contamination, or are diagnosed with a Non-Tuberculosis Mycobacterium (NTM) infection.

Data collection procedure and study tools

We will obtain informed consent from all participants prior to the social network questionnaire interview session. The consent process will involve providing detailed information about the study’s purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits. It will be emphasized that participation is entirely voluntary, and participants will have the opportunity to ask questions and discuss any concerns they may have about the study. This process ensures participants make an informed decision about their involvement. Consent will be documented through a signed consent form. The ethics committee has reviewed and approved the consent form, ensuring it meets all ethical standards and legal requirements before use.

To ensure participants’ rights and well-being, ethical considerations will be carefully considered. Patient autonomy will be respected by informing participants about their rights and ensuring their decision to participate or withdraw does not affect their medical care. Confidentiality will be maintained by protecting personal information and using it solely for research purposes. Finally, the design of the study aims to benefit participants, enhance the broader understanding and management of tuberculosis, and ultimately improve patient care and outcomes.

Data collection will utilise four tools: the Malaysia National TB (MyTB) database, patient medical records, sputum culture, and the Social Network Analysis (SNA) questionnaire.

MyTB database

The MyTB database will be used to obtain information such as patient’s registration ID, identification number, date of TB notification, date of TB diagnosis, sociodemographic characteristics, home address and patients’ clinical background. The factors obtained include age at diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, nationality, type of TB, type of case, method of tracing, status of comorbidities (diabetes, smoking), BCG scar, HIV status, DST results and treatment outcome.

Patients’ medical record

The patients’ identification number obtained through the MyTB database will be used to retrieve their medical record from the clinic, including telephone number and other contact details.

Sputum sample collection and culture

Each of the participants will be required to provide their early morning sputum samples on the day of TB diagnosis at TB Clinic. This step is routinely done in all TB patients. Sputum samples from the patients throughout Kuala Lumpur are routinely sent out to the Institute of Respiratory Medicine (IPR) in Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, a culture centre which equipped with a Level 2 risk laboratory. Sputum obtained will proceed to culture by using conventional method or automated method Bactec MGIT 960 by medical laboratory technologist in IPR. The Laboratory Turn Around Time (LTAT) for this step is six to eight weeks. Cultures displaying mycobacterium morphology suggestive of TB will be carefully transported to the National Public Health Laboratory (MKAK) for DNA extraction and genomic analysis.

The bacterial clinical isolates examined in this study were obtained from patients as part of routine diagnostic requests. The patient receives proper instructions for collecting sputum specimens, which include using a sterile, leak-proof container and properly identifying the specimen. The lab then receives the specimens. The laboratory places the specimen in a biological safety cabinet and processes it using the standard method of digestion and decontamination with 4% NaOH. The conventional method involves inoculating the suspension onto OGAWA media. When using automated culture, we top up the suspension with phosphate buffer (pH 7) to a volume of 50 ml, then centrifuge it at 3000 x g for 15 minutes. A volume of 500 and 100 μl of the suspension is inoculated in BACTEC MGIT 960 (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and on solid culture medium Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ). The Laboratory Turn Around Time (LTAT) for this step is six to eight weeks. Cultures with suggestive mycobacterium morphology are transported to the National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL) with proper cautions for identification tests. NPHL conducts identification tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) using immunochromatography (ICA) assays and then follows up with a line probe assay (LPA) for MTBC-negative cases. All isolates identified as MTBC are proceed to antibiotic susceptibility testing for first-line anti-TB drugs, including streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol. The results are reported using the SIMKA 3 web-based online system. Then, the MTBC isolates are kept in skim milk media, catalogued, and stored at −80 °C. Any isolates in this study will be found and re-subcultured on LJ medium for further use.

DNA extraction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) cultures will undergo molecular extraction. DNA will be extracted using Promega Maxwell RSC Viral Total Nucleic Acid Multi-Pack Kit. Colonies will be emulsified in extraction buffer and lysed at 56°C for 10 minutes. This procedure will be conducted in a biological safety level 3 facilities. The lysate will be transferred to Maxwell Cartridge and the remaining process is fully automated (follow manufacturer protocol). Extracts will be stored at -20°C.

Genomic investigation

Mycobacterium culture will be analysed using Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number Tandem Repeats (MIRU-VNTR) typing as the first-line genotype method followed by WGS for any cluster or selected TB cases. The isolates will be characterized by a standardised set of 24 VNTR loci. PCR fragments for VNTR loci will be loaded onto the QiaXcel Analyser for the fragment separation and allele calling.

For isolates undergoing whole genome sequencing, quantification and quality assessment of each extracted DNA will be performed using Qubit fluorometer and agarose gel electrophoresis. MTBC genomic DNA samples with the purity of 1.8–2.0 (OD260/280) and 2.0–2.2 (OD260/230) at concentration >100 ng/μL will be used for the subsequent whole genome sequencing experiments.

The MTB genome libraries will be prepared using the Nextera DNA Flex library preparation kit according to the man-ufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). The library concentration will be measured using the Qubit Fluorometer. The library pool will be sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform.

Bio-informatics analysis

A phylogenetic tree will be constructed using the MIRU-VNTRplus to identify closely related MIRU-VNTR patterns [19]. Sequence data by WGS will be analysed using open-source bioinformatics software by illumina.

Social network analysis questionnaire

Eligible patients, as according to the inclusion criteria, will be required to complete a social network analysis (SNA) questionnaire once. This SNA questionnaire will assess patients’ demographic background, medical history, drug and alcohol history, residence, travelling history, places of social aggregation and social networks using open-ended questions. This questionnaire is adopted from Gardy et al. (2011) and modified according to local suitability, especially on the type of common social activities related to the Malaysian culture [14]. Two versions of this questionnaire (English and Malays) will be available to facilitate the interview process.

All the information in the SNA questionnaire will be extracted and entered using the Excel 2016 spreadsheet to create an attribute table. Using the attribute table, a sociomatrix will be created to define and quantify the two-mode relationship between all patients. Relevant models will be created to identify the most effective combination of attribute data necessary to calculate the relevant SNA metrics. The information on clinical history and exposure to TB patient will be cross-validated by referring to patient medical records, contact investigation reports (TBIS 10C-2).

Each of the eligible patients will be contacted via telephone by the trained research assistant or the first author to make aware of the study and the needs of interview. Patients will be excluded if they do not agree to participate. For those willing to participate, the research assistant will set an appointment for the interview. The eligible patients will be interviewed at their own preferential time and method to ensure good response rate. Interviews will be conducted either through telephone call, face to face interviews in the clinic or online survey form. Each participant will be given explicit information about the study background, the purpose of the study and the data collection process. To increase trustworthiness of the study to the patients, the research assistance will provide a study poster that include all necessary information and contact details of all the researcher involves via WhatsApp. Informed consent will be taken before they enrolled in the study. Each participant will be given full autonomy to participate or withdraw from the study at any time without jeopardising their ongoing anti-TB treatment.

Visualization of TB cases distribution in Kuala Lumpur

This study will visualize areas with high incidence TB cases using home addresses obtained from the MyTB database. The existing physical address will be cleaned to remove unnecessary noise to improve TB case locations accuracy. Then the cleaned address will utilised for geocoding to get the longitude and latitude for each address. The cleaned and geocoded will be aggregated and applied on Tableau to highlight the TB hotspots based on the density number of TB cases. The data on vagabonds and unknown addresses will be excluded from the analysis. Fig 1 depicted the flow of the data collection activities planned for this study.

Fig 1. Data collection framework.

Fig 1

Proposed statistical methods

Questionnaire data analysis will be conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics Campus Edition Version 27.0 for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, United States), while analysis of MTB genome data will be carried out using open-source software programs. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise the characteristics of the subjects. Numerical data will be presented as either mean (SD) or median (IQR) based on normality distribution. Categorical data will be presented in terms of frequency and percentage.

The WGS data of MTBC isolates will be mapped against the reference genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strains. Isolates with the same genetic pattern will be regarded as a ‘cluster’, indicating the recent transmission of M. tuberculosis, while isolates with the different genetic pattern will be regarded as ‘unique’, arising from distantly acquired or reactivation of TB infection. Based on proposed SNP thresholds from various studies, three genomic cluster definitions were explored; a cutoff at 5 SNPs [20], 10 SNPs [21], and 12 SNPs [22, 23]. A genomic cluster will be defined as two or more isolates (same strain) that share an indistinguishable spoligotype and 15 locus MIRU-VNTR allelic pattern, following which we categorized the size of a cluster using the total number of isolates into categories of small (2 isolates), medium (3–5 isolates), large (6–20 isolates), and very large (>20 isolates) [24]. The Chi-square test will be used to calculate the frequencies of lineages in each district.

The sociomatrix will be imported to Ucinet, version 6 (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA, USA), to calculate the following SNA metrics for each node: degree centrality and betweenness centrality. Centrality is one of the major metrics of SNA used to describe the position of nodes within a network. The assumption is that the more centrally located a node is, the more likely the person is to be infected and to spread the infection. Degree centrality, one kind of centrality measure, is defined as the number of links incident upon a node—in other words, a node with a high degree centrality score is someone who has a large number of direct connections with others. Betweenness centrality, on the other hand, indicates the number of times a node acts as a bridge along the shortest path between two other nodes. A node with a high betweenness centrality score indicates that the person is well-positioned to perform as a ‘broker’ across smaller subgroups within the network. The sociograph for the models will be created using the open-source graph visualisation manipulation software, Gephi (The Gephi Consortium, the University of Technology of Compiegne, Compiegne, France; http://gephi.org/).

Risk factor analysis for TB clustering will involve categorizing patients, who were part of a cluster identified through network data and genotyping data during the study period, into six transmission groups (Table 1) [25]. This to identify which cases clustering suggested recent transmission, and which patients could have been identified by conventional contact tracing. Group assignment will be based on the information gained during both interview and molecular analysis. Data will be entered and analysed by using IBM SPSS version 27.0 for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, United States). Multinomial Logistic regression will be used in both the univariable and multivariable analysis in assessing the association between risk factors and outcome of the study, statistically adjusted for potential confounding effects of other covariates. All statistical tests will be two-sided, with a significant level of 0.05.

Table 1. Characteristics of the transmission groups.

Group Characteristics
1 Cases with clear epidemiological link and were genomically-linked confirmed by MIRU-VNTR and WGS
2 Cases with clear epidemiological link but were not genomically-linked confirmed by MIRU-VNTR and WGS
3 Cases with probable epidemiological link and were genomically-linked confirmed by MIRU-VNTR and WGS
4 Cases with probable epidemiological link but not genomically-linked confirmed by MIRU-VNTR and WGS
5 Cases with no epidemiological link and molecular typing indicated that they were part of a specific cluster.
6 Cases with no epidemiological link and were not part of any cluster (isolated cases)

A “clear epidemiological link” between two cases exists when one cases volunteers the name of the other as a close-contact, or both cases share time in the same social settings during a period when one of the cases was potentially infectious, such as living in the same house or being classmates at the time of TB diagnosis. A “probable epidemiological link” is established when both cases have spent time in the same social settings, though the exact timing remains uncertain, for example, living in the same apartment building or frequenting the same social venues [26].

Patient and public involvement

Patients will not participate in developing the research question, designing the study, recruiting participants, or conducting the study.

Ethics and dissemination

Dissemination and data sharing

The Malaysian National Medical Research Registry has registered this study, which has received ethical approval for the observational study from two human ethics committees: the Medical Research and Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR-19-2818-50518-IIR), and the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM/JEPeM/19090558). The study will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki principles and the Malaysian Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. It will be reported in accordancewith the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies to enhance reporting transparency [27]. Data and resources will be shared with other eligible investigators through academically established means. The datasets used and analysed during the study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All aspects of the study, including results, will be strictly confidential, and only the study team will have access to information on participants, except as required by law. In publication and presentation of the results, no reference will be made to individual subjects in a form that will expose their identity. A report of the study may be submitted for publication. However, individual participants will not be identifiable in such a report.

Data storage and management

Principal investigators (PI) or research assistants will enter all data, with the study PI verifying data accuracy. Data quality control measures will address missing data, outliers, and discrepancies, ensuring protected health information access is limited to research assistants and the PI. Unique identifiers will safeguard participant anonymity, with data stored securely and accessible only to the PI. Following the study, data and molecular samples will be securely disposed of, with a commitment to maintaining participant privacy and adhering to publication policies that protect subject information. Data quality control measures will include queries to identify missing data, outliers, and discrepancies. Only research assistants and PI will have access to protected health information. After enrolment, a unique identifier will be assigned to each study subject. The data from all sites will be uploaded and stored in a password-encrypted external hard disk which will only be accessible to the PI. All computers use in this study will be password protected and encrypted per university policy to increase security. The PI will ensure that the anonymity is maintained. Patients will not be identified by name in any reports on this study. The study PI will have access to the final study dataset. All data collection forms and questionnaires will be maintained in lockable filing cabinets within the corresponding author’s office. All data will be kept for two years after the completion of the study. To re-identify data at a later stage for feedback to participants, the data will be stored in the identifiable or potentially identifiable (coded) form. The molecular samples will be kept at National Public Health Laboratory (MKAK) and will be disposed of after the study period ended. After the prescribed storage time, all hard paper copies will be shredded before placement in a secure paper recycling bin. All soft copy data will be deleted. With regards to the publication policy, no personal information of subjects will be published to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the subject’s personal information. Permission from the Director-General of Health, Malaysia, or relevant authorities will be obtained prior to publication. The respondents can request for published findings.

Discussion

Stopping transmission is an essential component of halting the global TB epidemic, especially in high and moderate TB-burden countries like Malaysia. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant implications for the transmission and management of TB. While TB and COVID-19 are caused by different pathogens, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced TB transmission dynamics in several ways. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to disruptions in TB diagnosis and treatment services due to the reorganization of healthcare systems to address the surge in COVID-19 cases. Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and fear of visiting healthcare facilities have resulted in decreased access to TB diagnostic services such as smear microscopy, chest X-rays, and molecular tests. This disruption has led to delays in TB diagnosis and treatment initiation, potentially resulting in increased transmission and worse clinical outcomes for TB patients [28]. (Yadav et al., 2021).

The COVID-19 pandemic has also impacted active case finding activities for TB, including community-based screening programs and contact tracing. Resource reallocation and diversion of healthcare personnel to COVID-19 response efforts have led to the scaling back or suspension of these activities in many settings, resulting in decreased detection of TB cases and delays in identifying new infections [29]. (Kuznetsov et al., 2020). Individuals with TB are at increased risk of severe outcomes if they contract COVID-19 due to underlying lung damage and compromised immune function. This dual burden places TB patients at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic [30]. (World Health Organization, 2020).

Besides, he influx of COVID-19 patients has strained healthcare systems globally, leading to shortages of healthcare workers and resources. In TB endemic regions, this has resulted in challenges in maintaining infection control practices in healthcare facilities, potentially leading to nosocomial transmission of TB and exacerbating the burden of both diseases [31]. (Auld et al., 2020). In short, the COVID-19 pandemic has had profound implications for TB transmission dynamics, diagnosis, treatment, and control efforts. Mitigating these impacts requires innovative strategies to ensure continuity of TB services while addressing the challenges posed by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

This is a first study that is attempted to elucidate the pattern of TB transmission in Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic period using epidemiological, geospatial, social network and genomic data. Previous studies in Botswana (2012–2016) and Vietnam (2020–2023) used high-resolution geospatial and genetic data to understand the tuberculosis transmission. The study used whole-genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum cultures to map TB cases and identify transmission clusters [32, 33].

Implementation of social network analysis into TB practice and research also has shown as a valuable tool for understanding TB transmission dynamics and informing targeted interventions to control the spread of the disease. By analyzing social connections and interactions, SNA can provide insights into the underlying mechanisms driving TB transmission within communities, households, and healthcare settings, ultimately contributing to more effective TB control strategies [34, 35].

These findings indicate that precise interventions driven by genomic, social network and geospatial analytics could effectively end TB outbreaks in certain places, indicating the potential for comparable tactics in varied situations to combat TB globally and specifically in Kuala Lumpur.

We faced difficulties in the early phase of the study which were originally planned to use prospective data collection technique which should commenced in the middle of 2020. The data collection process was hugely affected due to the COVID-19 national lockdown and several mobility restrictions orders which were implemented starting March 2020 until end of 2021, hence we have postponed the data collection and change the methodology to retrospective study. We are aware of the limitations and possible biases that may incur due to the nature of retrospective study design (i.e recall bias, selection bias, missing data and non-response bias). The researchers will try to minimise the effect of possible limitation and biases by conducting interviews using guided open-ended questions that is suitable to obtain optimum information from the participants. The interviews will be carefully conducted using the method and time that is ease to the participants to encourage participation and reducing non-response bias. Characteristics of all missing cases, unreachable or dead PTB cases that are part of the 2020 and 2021 cohorts will also be analyse and treated accordingly in the data analysis to ensure that their characteristics are comparable to the study participants. As of the submission of this article, the data collection and data analysis is still ongoing and we have not published any results yet. This study is in line with the targets of the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages by targeting to ending the TB epidemics [36]. The finding of this study should be able to provide social-behavioral insights to better understanding TB transmission pattern in which could guide related stakeholders in designing TB screening and prevention activities in the community towards higher TB case detection and reducing TB incidence rate in the population.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of 16 government TB treatment centre by health administrative area in Kuala Lumpur.

(PDF)

pone.0307921.s001.pdf (63.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank valuable comments on drafts of this protocol.

Data Availability

Deidentified research data will be made publicly available in a public repository when the study is completed and published.

Funding Statement

NMS had received a Ministry of Higher Education grant under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme 2019, FRGS/1/2019/SKK05/USM/02/1.Funder website: https://www.mohe.gov.my/en. The funders did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Global tuberculosis report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. WHO Press. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/191102
  • 2.Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021
  • 3.Global tuberculosis report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022
  • 4.Pai M, Kasaeva T, and Swaminathan S. Covid-19’s Devastating Effect on Tuberculosis Care—A Path to Recovery. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386:16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2118145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tok PSK, Kamarudin NA, Jamaludin M, Ab Razak MF, Ahmad MAS, Abu Bakar FA et al. Effect of COVID-19 on tuberculosis notification in Johor Bahru, Malaysia, Infect.Dis. 2022;54: 235–237. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.2000636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH). 2018. Health Facts 2018. http://www.moh.gov.my/images/gallery/publications/HEALTH%20FACTS%202017.pdf.
  • 7.Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH) and Academy of Medicine of Malaysia. Practice Guidelines for Control and Management of Tuberculosis. 3rd edition. 2012. https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/attachments/8612.pdf
  • 8.Yuen CM, Amanullah F, Dharmadhikari A, Nardell EA, Seddon JA, Vasilyeva I, et al. Turning off the tap: stopping tuberculosis transmission through active case-finding and prompt effective treatment. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2334–2343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00322-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meehan CJ, Goig GA, Kohl TA, Verboven L, Dippernaar A, Ezewudo M, et al. Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17: 533–545. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0214-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing Social Networks. 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Valente TW. Social Networks and Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, Pawinski R, Govender T, Lalloo U, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet. 2006; 368(9547):1575–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69573-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gardy JL, Johnston JC, Sui SJH, Cook VJ, Shah L, Brodkin E, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing and SocialNetwork Analysis of a Tuberculosis Outbreak. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:730–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katale BZ, Mbelele PM, Lema NA, Campino S, Mshana SE, Rweyemamu MM, et al. Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and clinical outcomes of patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Tanzania. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 174. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6577-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang M, Zhang Y, Huang C, Li J, Shen X, Zhao G, et al. A Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Study to Delineate the Risk and Characteristics of Tuberculosis Transmission in an Insular Population Over 10 Years in Shanghai. Front. Microbiol. 2022;12:768659. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.768659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kawatsu L, Izumi K, Uchimura, Urakawa M, Ohkado A, and Takahashi I. Can social network analysis assist in the prioritisation of contacts in a tuberculosis contact investigation?. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(11):1293–1299. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaur KK, Said SM, Lim PY, and Syed Ismail SN. Urbanization and Tuberculosis in Peninsular, Malaysia (2011–2015). Mal J Med Health Sci. 2020; 16(SUPP11): 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Constantin MA, Schuurman NK, and Vermunt JK. A general Monte Carlo method for sample size analysis in the context of network models. Psychological Methods. 2023; Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/met0000555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Allix-Béguec C, Harmsen D, Weniger T, Supply P, Niemann S. Evaluation and strategy for use of MIRU-VNTRplus, a multifunctional database for online analysis of genotyping data and phylogenetic identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. Aug;46(8):2692–9. Epub 2008 Jun 11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00540-08 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Walker TM, Ip CLC, Harrell RH, Evans JT, Kapatai G, Dedicoat MJ, et al. Whole-genome sequencing to delineate Mycobacterium Tuberculosis outbreaks: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:137–46. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70277-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guerra-Assunção JA, Crampin AC, Houben R, Mzembe T, Mallard K, Coll F, et al. Large-scale whole genome sequencing of M. tuberculosis provides insights into transmission in a high prevalence area. eLife. 2015; 4:e05166. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Walker TM, Lalor MK, Broda A, Ortega LS, Morgan M, Parker L, et al. Assessment of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis transmission in Oxfordshire, UK, 2007–12, with whole pathogen genome sequences: an observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2:285–92. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70027-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang C, Luo T, Shen X, Wu J, Gan M, Xu P, et al. Transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Shanghai, China: a retrospective observational study using whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological investigation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:275–84. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30418-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Asare P, Otchere ID, Bedeley E, Brites D, Loiseau C, Baddoo NA, et al. Whole Genome Sequencing and Spatial Analysis Identifies Recent Tuberculosis Transmission Hotspots in Ghana. Front. Med. 2020;7:161. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deutekom Hv, Hoijng SP, Haas PEWd, Langendam MW, Horsman A, Soolingen Dv, et al. Clustered Tuberculosis cases Do they represent recent transmission and can they be detected earlier?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:806–810. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200306-856OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lalor MK, Casali N, Walker TM, Anderson LF, Davidson JA, Ratna N, et al. The use of whole-genome sequencing in cluster investigation of a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis outbreak. Eur Respir J. 2018; 51: 1702313 doi: 10.1183/13993003.02313-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Von EE, Altman DG, and Egger M. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. UroToday Int J. 2009;2:20–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yadav SR, Ghosh A, Kotian S, and Barik S. Impact of COVID-19 on tuberculosis elimination in India. The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis. 2021; 68(1), 131–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kuznetsov VN, Tikhonova OE, and Demikhova OV. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on TB detection in the Russian Federation. Problemy Tuberkuleza I Bolezney Legkikh. 2020; 98(12), 62–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • 31.Auld SC, Kasmar AG, Shaw BM, and Ricks DJ. An Imperative Need for Tuberculosis Screening and Prevention in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020; 222(3), 400–402. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baker CR, Barilar I, de Araujo LS, Rimoin AW, Parker DM, Boyd R, et al. Use of High-Resolution Geospatial and Genomic Data to Characterize Recent Tuberculosis Transmission, Botswana. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023. May;29(5):977–987. doi: 10.3201/eid2905.220796 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spies R, Hong HN, Trieu PP, Lan LK, Lan K, Hue N, et al. Spatial Analysis of Drug-Susceptible and Multidrug-Resistant Cases of Tuberculosis, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2020–2023. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2024; 30(3), 499–509. doi: 10.3201/eid3003.231309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McElroy PD, Rothenberg RB, and Varghese R. The application of social network analysis to tuberculosis contact tracing in a high-incidence urban community. Public Health Reports. 2020; 135(1_suppl), 64S–72S. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morris MD, Popper ST, Rodwell TC, Brodine SK, and Brouwer KC. Healthcare barriers of indigenous peoples in high-income countries: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health. 2017; 107(7), e1–e9. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20Framework%20after%202022%20refinement_Eng.pdf.

Decision Letter 0

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

13 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-07536Social-behavioral insights in understanding Tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The MyTBNet study protocolPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mohd Shariff,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Overall, the protocol is well written and I thought the authors could generate very relevant and comprehensive scientific evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on tuberculosis transmission. It is suggested

 1. Define well the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the participants.

2. Specify how the sample size calculation was developed.

3. Deepen the discussion of the manuscript, especially in the interpretation and implications of the information findings.

4. Review the writing of the article, from the use of punctuation to the coherence of the sentences

Please submit your revised manuscript by  April 15. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-197

- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg098

- http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044746

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. Please provide a complete Data Availability Statement in the submission form, ensuring you include all necessary access information or a reason for why you are unable to make your data freely accessible. If your research concerns only data provided within your submission, please write "All data are in the manuscript and/or supporting information files" as your Data Availability Statement.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

********** 

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

********** 

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dears

Thank you very much for the opportunity to review this interesting study protocol that is proposed to investigate Tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Overall, the protocol is well written, and I believed authors could generate very relevant and comprehensive scientific evidence on the impact of COVID-19 in TB transmission. I understood the authors presented rigorous methodology with robust molecular investigation techniques and detailed sampling and analytical approaches, which is also great to link epidemiological, clinical and social network data to inform better understanding of TB transmission dynamics during the pandemic.

Hence, at this stage I have no major comments except asking the respected authors to provide further explanation for the following few points.

# 118-119: “A retrospective population-based …. study of patients diagnosed with TB will be carried out from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2024 “while target population for this study is all PTB patients notified during the peak season of the pandemic in year 2020 and 2021. Can you please redefine your study design and period? Here I understood that though most of the clinical and demographic data will be retrieved from the national TB database (MyTB), you had also a plan to collect additional data until 2024- this indicated both prospective and retrospective approach. If you are still stick with histories of social networking during the pandemic and not include any prospective information, the study period would be 2021-2022.

#156 Is it relevant to mention “Unwilling to participate or lack of consent” as one of the exclusion criteria? If possible, can you also reconsider the importance of Transfer out cases for social network interview as they probably have independent contribution on TB transmission or MTBC strain clustering? - my opinion.

Sputum sample collection and culturing procedure is not clear for me. When how and who performed smear and culture? Are you going to re-processed stored sputum samples, or do you think the one that was done as part of the routine service can fit for your study? - I think it is better to elaborate your quality control methods. Related to this, can you also reflect the estimated number of cases and eligible samples that would be adequate enough to answer your research question?

# 245-46: Interviews will be conducted either through telephone call, face to face interviews in the clinic or online survey form. Do you think the later two works in your setting to collect information from TB patients who completed their treatment before a year?

# 251-52 Each participant will be given full autonomy to participate or withdraw from the study at any time without jeopardising their ongoing anti-TB treatment. Do you think or expecting patients who are still on treatment?

#302-04, I agreed a Multivariable Multinomial Logistic regression will be an appropriate method to control potential confounding effects if you are only included individual level data but TB transmission; social networking and molecular epidemiology, might have hierarchical (multi-level) structure: hence it would be also better to think about other statistical modeling techniques (mixed effect or multilevel regression analysis) to adjust and/or identify the effect of geographical or other cluster (group) covariates.

Oops! The discussion section explained some of the above points, but it would be better to include in the method section of the protocol while that will be further discussed as part of the final study limitation.

Regards

Reviewer #2: Respected editorial board,

It is a privilege to be considered as a reviewer for your prestigious journal. I have been recommended to review the protocol titled “Social-behavioural insights in understanding Tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The MyTBNet study protocol” with no personal conflicts of interests as declared. The protocol addresses an important issue, the social-behavioural dynamics of the TB transmission. The study aims to facilitate TB screening and active mapping of social contacts for effective formulation of preventive and preparedness strategies to interrupt TB transmission. However, the study being a retrospective is likely to have various limitations. The authors have embraced their strengths yet have overlooked to mention major limitations in the methodology.

Being a clinical concern and a relevant research question with an expected large sample size, after a few satisfactory revisions on the presentation and some concerns , it would be worth considering for publication in your scientific journal.

Respected researcher,

the protocol titled “Social-behavioural insights in understanding Tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The MyTBNet study protocol” addresses an important issue, the social-behavioural dynamics of the TB transmission. The study aims to facilitate TB screening and active mapping of social contacts for effective formulation of preventive and preparedness strategies to interrupt TB transmission.

Multiple previous studies have demonstrated a plausible theoretical parameter for risk of transmission of TB, however with the large number of patients planned to undergo genomic mapping for deciphering the same, makes this study unique and worthy of appraisal.

There were a few concerns raised by the reviewer which may need to be addressed by the authors for better understanding and scientific soundness of the article.

The study being a retrospective one with electronic data collection fails to have a prospective evaluation of the TB cases and contact tracing or testing of the exposed. As researchers have honestly highlighted several potentials bias like selection bias, recall bias, missing data , non-response bias and the unmeasured underlying disease status are a major limitation of the retrospective electronic data collection.

Authors are suggested to elaborate upon the criteria of inclusion of suspected TB cases as its likely to make the interpretation of TB epidemiology questionable. The methodology needs to mention the SNA questionnaire that the researchers intend to use .

For statistical validity it is suggested that the authors additionally mention the calculation of the sample size based on previously conducted prevalence or incidence studies in the region for tuberculosis. The represented population of TB cases maybe an underestimation as the TB centres included may be limited. Furthermore, the study is planned to include sputum positive and negative cases both whereas the genotypic study is being conducted only among confirmed cases , leading to a smaller sample size.

Researchers have proposed a novel methodology to establish contact tracing and transmission of tuberculosis , however, pathogenesis of tuberculosis is different from that the STDs. As the latent period of tuberculosis maybe longer than even a few years in certain cases, it shall be difficult to ascertain when the patient was infected and to determine the causality with COVID-19 restrictions.

There are few fundamental flaws in the article writing including punctuations, flow of thought, comprehension, and grammatical errors. Lack of clarity of discussion are further concerns which the authors are requested to improve upon. Overestimated conclusions with a poorly powered observation study could send a wrong message and needs to be paraphrased for generalisability.

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Hawult Taye Adane

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0307921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307921.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Apr 2024

Reviewer comment

1. Define well the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the participants.

Author response:

We have detailed out the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study participants in the ‘Inclusion and exclusion criteria’ section in page 8 and 9.

2. Specify how the sample size calculation was developed.

Author response:

We have specified the sample size calculation in the manuscript as recommended by the reviewer. Changes can be found in page 7.

3. Deepen the discussion of the manuscript, especially in the interpretation and implications of the information findings.

Author response:

We have expanded the discussion accordingly. Changes can be found in page 19-21.

4. Review the writing of the article, from the use of punctuation to the coherence of the sentences.

Author response:

We have reviewed and improve the writing of the article in terms of punctuation to the coherence of the sentences throughout the article for better readability.

Decision Letter 1

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

7 May 2024

PONE-D-23-07536R1Social-behavioral insights in understanding Tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The MyTBNet study protocolPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mohd Shariff,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. It is suggested:

1. Better explain the aspects related to the study design

2. Specify ethical aspects, how informed consent was achieved and ethical aspects such as patient autonomy

3. Delve into sputum culture and collection procedures.

4. Review the discussion both in form and substance, it should be written more clearly and objectively.

  Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 17 2024 11:59PM, If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0307921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307921.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


3 Jun 2024

1) Better explain the aspects related to the study design

Author response:

This study will be conducted as a retrospective cohort study involving TB patients who were belongs to the COVID-19 pandemic year (diagnosed in 2020 and 2021) cohort diagnosed and receiving treatment in Kuala Lumpur. We have elaborate further about the selection of this type of study design to answer the study objective in ‘Study design’ section under the Methodology. (page 6)

2) Specify ethical aspects, how informed consent was achieved and ethical aspects such as patient autonomy.

Author response:

The ethical aspects related to the handling of inform consent and respecting patients’ autonomy has been further explained in the manuscript under the ‘Data Collection Procedure and Study Tools’ section. (page 10)

3) Delve into sputum culture and collection procedures.

Author response:

We have further explained about the sputum culture and collection in the ‘Sputum sample collection and culture’ section in the manuscript. (page 11-12)

4) Review the discussion both in form and substance, it should be written more clearly and objectively.

Author response:

We would like to ask permission from the reviewer to maintain the writing in the discussion section as we believed all important aspects related to the study protocol has been covered and discussed objectively. However, explicit discussion based on the study finding will be included later in the discussion once the study has been carried out and completed. (page 20-22)

Decision Letter 2

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

10 Jul 2024

Social-behavioral insights in understanding Tuberculosis transmission pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: The MyTBNet study protocol

PONE-D-23-07536R2

Dear Dr. Mohd Shariff,Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I would like to thank authors who made the required revision and response to my previous comment.

Though, I am still not clear about the design (study period and sampling procedure, this is a very detailed protocol and well written

I thought this is Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection from PTB patients diagnosed during 2020 and 2021 . Hence, Authors should reconsidered my previous comment and re-phrase the statements under line 117-118).....epidemiological cohort study of patients diagnosed with TB will be carried out from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2024. I understood the later is used to refer the time when authors plan to undertake the study but this my confuse readers and there might be misunderstanding on the actual period for source of data.

Except the above issue , I have no major concerns and this protocol can be accepted for publication

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

16 Jul 2024

PONE-D-23-07536R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mohd Shariff,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. List of 16 government TB treatment centre by health administrative area in Kuala Lumpur.

    (PDF)

    pone.0307921.s001.pdf (63.9KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    Deidentified research data will be made publicly available in a public repository when the study is completed and published.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES